Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge Complex in Limestone, Madison, and Morgan Counties, AL, 16811-16815 [E7-6346]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
Housing, Community Planning and
Development, and Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity. All waivers by the
Regional Directors in the Office of Field
Policy and Management must be jointly
concurred in by the appropriate
Regional Program Director or Assistant
Secretary, as directed by the applicable
Assistant Secretary.
Section B: Directives, Handbooks, and
Provisions Excluded
The waiver authority delegated herein
does not include the authority to waive
regulations, or those Departmental
directives and handbook provisions
mandated by or directly predicated on
a statute, executive order, or regulation,
including, but not limited to,
environmental, ethics, fair housing, civil
rights enforcement and compliance,
procurement, and other provisions.
Additionally, the waiver authority
delegated herein does not include the
authority to waive provisions contained
in the HUD Litigation Handbook.
Section C: Authority Revoked
Any previous delegated or redelegated
authority to Regional Directors
inconsistent with this delegation of
authority is hereby revoked.
Section D: Authority To Redelegate
This authority may not be
redelegated.
Authority: Section 7(q), Department of
Housing and Urban Development Act (42
U.S.C. 3535(a)); Section 7(d), Department of
Housing and Urban Development Act (42
U.S.C. 3535(d)); Federal Vacancies Reform
Act of 1998 (5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq.).
Dated: March 30, 2007.
Alphonso Jackson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–6390 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of Application of Endangered
Species Recovery Permits
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
receipt of applications.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We announce our receipt of
applications to conduct certain
activities pertaining to enhancement of
survival of endangered species.
DATES: Written comments on this
request for a permit must be received by
May 7, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
Written data or comments
should be submitted to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Assistant Regional
Director, Fisheries-Ecological Services,
P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center,
Denver, Colorado 80225–0486; facsimile
303–236–0027. Documents and other
information submitted with these
applications are available for review,
subject to the requirements of the
Privacy Act [5 U.S.C. 552A] and
Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C.
552], by any party who submits a
request for a copy of such documents
within 30 days of the date of publication
of this notice to Kris Olsen, by mail or
by telephone at 303–236–4256. All
comments received from individuals
become part of the official public
record.
ADDRESSES:
The
following applicants have requested
issuance of enhancement of survival
permits to conduct certain activities
with endangered species pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Applicant—Western Transportation
Institute, Montana State University,
Bozeman, Montana, TE–150365. The
applicant requests a permit to take
Topeka shiner (Notropis topeka) in
conjunction with recovery activities
throughout the species’ range for the
purpose of enhancing its survival and
recovery.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicant—Sternberg Museum, Hays,
Kansas, TE–150363. The applicant
requests a permit to take gray bat
(Myotis grisescens), Indiana bat (Myotis
sodalis), and black-footed ferret
(Mustela nigripes) in conjunction with
recovery activities throughout the
species’ range for the purpose of
enhancing their survival and recovery.
Applicant—U.S. Geological Survey,
Biological Resources Division, Cortland,
New York, TE–150352. The applicant
requests a permit to take pallid sturgeon
(Scaphirhynchus albus) in conjunction
with recovery activities throughout the
species’ range for the purpose of
enhancing its survival and recovery.
Applicant—U.S. Geological Survey,
Northern Prairie Wildlife Research
Center, Jamestown, North Dakota, TE–
121914. The applicant requests a permit
amendment to modify survey and
banding techniques for Interior least
terns (Sternula antillarum), piping
plovers (Charadrius melodus), and
pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus)
in conjunction with recovery activities
throughout the species’ range for the
purpose of enhancing their survival and
recovery.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16811
Applicant—U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Great Plains Fish and Wildlife
Management Assistance Office, Pierre,
South Dakota, TE–056851. The
applicant requests a renewed permit to
take pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus
albus) in conjunction with recovery
activities throughout the species’ range
for the purpose of enhancing its survival
and recovery.
Applicant—Department of the Army,
Conservation Division, Ft. Riley,
Kansas, TE–049623. The applicant
requests a renewed permit to take
Topeka shiner (Notropis topeka) in
conjunction with recovery activities
throughout the species’ range for the
purpose of enhancing its survival and
recovery.
Applicant—National Park Service,
Zion National Park, Springdale, Utah,
TE–057485. The applicant requests a
renewed permit to take Holmgren milkvetch (Astragalus holmgreniorum),
Shivwitz milk-vetch (Astragalus
ampullarioides), and Southwestern
willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii
extimus) in conjunction with recovery
activities throughout the species’ range
for the purpose of enhancing their
survival and recovery.
Dated: March 21, 2007.
Elliott N. Sutta,
Acting Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. E7–6341 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment for
Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge
Complex in Limestone, Madison, and
Morgan Counties, AL
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service, announce that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment (Draft CCP/
EA) for Wheeler National Wildlife
Refuge Complex is available for review
and comment. The National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires the Service to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife
refuge. This Draft CCP, when final, will
describe how we intend to manage the
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
16812
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge
Complex over the next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your comments no later
than May 7, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information to: John
Beck, Natural Resource Planner,
Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 2700 Refuge Headquarters
Road, Decatur, AL 35603; Telephone
256/353–7243 ext. 32. Your comments
may be sent electronically to:
John_Beck@fws.gov with a subject line,
‘‘Draft CCP Comments: Wheeler NWR
Complex.’’ The Draft CCP/EA may be
accessed and downloaded from the
Service’s Internet Web site https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge
Complex is currently comprised of
seven refuges, spreading across 12,500
square miles of northern Alabama. In
addition, the Wheeler Complex
administers five Farm Service Agency
conservation easement tracts. This draft
plan covers four of the seven refuges.
These refuges and their establishing
dates are as follows: Wheeler (1938);
Key Cave (1997); Sauta Cave, formerly
known as Blowing Wind Cave (1978);
and Fern Cave (1981). The other three
refuges, Cahaba River (2002), Mountain
Longleaf (2003), and Watercress Darter
(1980), will be addressed at a later date
in a separate comprehensive
conservation plan.
Wheeler Refuge is located among the
cities of Athens, Decatur, and
Huntsville. The refuge was established
in 1938 by Executive Order 7926 as a
breeding ground for migratory birds and
other wildlife. Additional purposes
were added later under the authorities
of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act
of 1929, and the Refuge Recreation Act
of 1962. This 37,000-acre refuge is
overlaid on the middle third of the
Tennessee Valley Authority’s Wheeler
Reservoir with property in Limestone,
Madison, and Morgan Counties. Refuge
lands were acquired in 1934 and 1935
by the Tennessee Valley Authority to
serve as a buffer strip for the reservoir,
which was impounded a year later in
1936.
Considered the eastern most national
wildlife refuge in the Mississippi
Flyway, Wheeler provides winter
habitat for the state’s largest duck
population and formerly supported the
southernmost and Alabama’s only major
concentration of wintering Canada
geese. Snow geese are now the most
prominent component of the winter
goose population.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
The refuge consists of approximately
25,950 acres of land and 11,250 acres of
water. Habitats consist of bottomland
hardwoods, mixed hardwoods, pine
uplands, shallow water embayments,
and agricultural fields that support
interesting flora; a bird list of 288
species; and a wide variety of mammals,
reptiles, amphibians, and fishes. It is
well developed with more than 100
miles of graveled roads, 2,500 acres of
managed wetlands, a modern
Headquarters Complex with a large
Visitor Center and a Waterfowl
Observation Building. Approximately
700,000 visitors are reported annually.
Key Cave Refuge was established in
1997 under the authority of the Fish and
Wildlife Act of 1956, the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, and the National
Wildlife Refuge Administration Act of
1966 to ensure that the biological
integrity of Key Cave, Collier Cave, and
Collier Bone Cave remains intact. Key
Cave is the only known refuge for the
federally endangered Alabama cavefish
(Speoplatyrhinus poulsoni). It is on the
northern shore of Pickwick Lake in a
limestone karst area that contains
numerous sinkholes and several
underground cave systems. The area’s
sinkholes are an integral component of
groundwater recharge to the caves.
Prior to 1992, the Monsanto Company
owned a large 1,060-acre-tract of land
just north of Key Cave and about five
miles southwest of Florence, Lauderdale
County, Alabama, in the high hazard
risk area of the Key Cave Aquifer. In
1992 the company sold this tract to The
Conservation Fund. Five years later, the
Service acquired the land and
established Key Cave Refuge.
In addition to the Alabama cavefish,
Key Cave Refuge also serves as a priority
one maternity cave for the federally
endangered gray bat (Myotis grisescens),
as well as habitat for two species of
blind crayfish (Procambarus pecki and
Cambarus jonesi). Collier Cave, located
approximately 1.5 miles upstream from
Key Cave, and Collier Bone Cave are
also considered potential habitat for
these cave species. Cave entrances are
located on Tennessee Valley Authority
lands on the northern shore of Pickwick
Lake. Furthermore, the refuge provides
habitat for a variety of migratory and
resident wildlife species. Several
priority bird species commonly
occurring on the refuge include:
dickcissel, grasshopper sparrow, field
sparrow, northern bobwhite, northern
harrier, and short-eared owl.
Sauta Cave Refuge, known as Blowing
Wind Cave Refuge until 1999, lies just
above the Sauty Creek embayment of the
Tennessee Valley Authority’s
Guntersville Reservoir, seven miles west
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of Scottsboro, Jackson County, Alabama.
The refuge consists of 264 acres of
hardwood forest established in 1978
under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 to provide
protection for the federally endangered
gray bat and the Indiana bat (Myotis
sodalis) and their crucial habitat. The
cave provides a summer roosting site for
about 300,000–400,000 gray bats and a
winter hibernaculum for both bats.
Besides the endangered bats, many
other species occur in the cave,
including the Tennessee cave
salamander (Gyrinophilus palleucus)
and the cave salamander (Eurycea
lucifuga). Additionally, a relatively large
population (>250 individuals) of Price’s
potato-bean (Apios priceana), a
federally threatened plant species, is
found on the refuge. The cave has upper
and lower gated entrances and 14,628
feet of mapped passage. Formations in
the lower cave have been described as
spectacular and petroglyphs have been
found on the cave ceilings. The cave
was used as a saltpeter mine during the
civil war, a nightclub during the 1920s,
and a fallout shelter during the 1960s.
All 264 acres of habitat outside of the
cave are predominately hardwood
forest.
Fern Cave Refuge was established in
1981 under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 to
provide protection for the endangered
gray bat and the Indiana bat. The refuge
is 20 miles west of Scottsboro and two
miles northeast of Paint Rock in Jackson
County, Alabama, and consists of 199
acres of forested hillside underlain by a
massive cave with many stalactite- and
stalagmite-filled rooms. An additional
299 acres of land are included in the
approved acquisition boundary of the
refuge.
The cave itself has five hidden
entrances, with four of these currently
occurring on the refuge. The fifth
entrance (Surprise Pit) is within the
approved acquisition boundary for the
refuge. Recent estimates indicate that
one million gray bats hibernate in the
cave, making it the largest wintering
colony of gray bats in the United States.
In the past, the threatened American
Hart’s-tongue fern (Phyllitis
scolopendrum var. americana) has been
found on the refuge.
Significant issues addressed in the
draft plan include: threatened and
endangered species conservation;
waterfowl management; wildlife
monitoring and population surveys,
invasive/exotic species control;
bottomland hardwood restoration;
agriculture; visitor services (e.g.,
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, and
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
environmental education and
interpretation); funding and staffing;
cultural resources protection; land and
visitor protection; urban encroachment;
and water quality issues. We developed
four alternatives for managing the
Wheeler Complex and chose Alternative
D as the proposed alternative. These
alternatives are briefly described as
follows:
Alternative A, the no-action
alternative, would continue current
Complex management practices. We
would not initiate any significant
changes. Management emphasis would
continue to focus on maintaining
biological integrity of habitats found on
each refuge in the Complex. All
management actions would be directed
towards achieving the Complex’s
primary purposes, including (1)
conserving wintering waterfowl habitat;
(2) meeting the habitat conservation
goals of national and international
plans; and (3) conserving wetlands, all
while contributing to other national,
regional, and state goals to protect and
restore migratory birds, threatened and
endangered species, and resident
species. Alternative A represents the
anticipated conditions of each refuge for
the next 15 years assuming current
policies, programs, and activities
continue.
Refuge management programs would
continue to be developed and
implemented with limited baseline
biological information. Active habitat
management would be conducted
through water level manipulations and
moist-soil, cropland, and forest
management designed to provide a
diverse complex of habitats that meets
the foraging, resting, and breeding
requirements for a variety of species.
Hunting and fishing would continue to
be major focuses of the public use
program, with no expansion of current
opportunities. Current restrictions or
prohibitions would remain.
Environmental education, wildlife
observation, and wildlife photography
would be accommodated at present
levels.
Alternative B would maximize
compatible wildlife-dependent public
use. It would provide for more public
use recreational opportunities, while
maintaining current habitat and wildlife
management programs. Additional staff
and/or resources would be dedicated to
increasing compatible wildlifedependent public use opportunities.
Most habitat management programs,
including the cooperative farming
program, would continue; however,
habitat improvement projects that
would benefit compatible wildlifedependent public use opportunities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
would be given a higher priority. Law
enforcement activities to provide visitor
safety would be intensified.
Under this alternative, hunting and
fishing opportunities would be
expanded. At Wheeler Refuge, the
number of hunting days for small game
would be increased within the state
hunting season framework and two
additional youth fishing rodeos would
be held annually. The 2,000 acres
around Garth Slough, presently closed
to all public entry from November 15
through January 15, would be evaluated
for the possible opening of portions of
the upland areas to public access under
existing gate closure policy; thereby
providing additional hunting and other
public use opportunities. In addition,
the hunting of feral hogs would be
allowed during both the large game and
small game seasons. At Key Cave
Refuge, feral hogs would be added to the
hunting permit and other hunting
opportunities would be explored
annually.
Increased wildlife observation and
photography opportunities would result
from the construction of nine new
visitor facilities (e.g., three photo blinds,
three wildlife observation towers, a
wildlife viewing platform, a nature trail,
and a wildlife drive) and the
rehabilitation of existing visitor
facilities. Environmental education and
interpretation would be expanded by
increasing the number of off-refuge
programs with local schools and by
constructing a new environmental
education center at Wheeler Refuge.
New informational brochures would be
published for Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and
Fern Cave Refuges and visitor access
would be improved at Sauta Cave
Refuge.
Additional resources would be
required to accomplish the goals of this
alternative. Personnel priorities would
include employing additional education
specialists, wildlife biologists, a law
enforcement officer, and an education
coordinator.
Alternative C would maximize
wildlife/habitat management by
providing for the restoration of native
wildlife, fish, and plant communities
and the health of those communities,
while maintaining current public use
opportunities. Federally listed species
would be of primary concern, but needs
of other resident and migratory wildlife
would also be considered. At each
refuge, extensive wildlife, plant, and
habitat inventories would be initiated to
obtain the biological information
needed to implement and monitor
management programs.
Studies necessary to reduce impacts
of contaminants to fish, wildlife, and
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16813
plants would be developed and a
complex-wide litter control program
would be initiated. Research would also
be initiated to explore methods for
increasing conservation efforts for
threatened and endangered species on
Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and Fern Cave
Refuges.
Habitat management programs for
waterfowl impoundments, old field,
cropland, grassland, and forests would
be re-evaluated and step-down
management plans would be developed
or updated to meet the foraging, resting,
and breeding requirements for a variety
of species, particularly migratory birds.
Any areas within the Complex with
pumping capabilities and water control
structures would be managed for moistsoil vegetation, or would be farmed
(with 100 percent of crops left standing)
to benefit migratory waterfowl.
Cooperative farming would be
eliminated and all farming activities
would be conducted via contracts or
force account using Complex staff and
equipment. Farming fields would be
planted in milo, corn, or soybeans (in
order of preference) and flooded during
the late fall and winter. Beaver control
would be increased by expanding the
contract with USDA’s Wildlife Services
and forestry management would be
increased.
Law enforcement activities to protect
trust resources would be intensified and
a study to analyze the impacts of
existing rights-of-way on refuge
resources would be initiated. Results
would determine if current Complex
policy concerning easements should be
altered. Coordination with local
planning and zoning departments
would be increased to help minimize
encroachment from urbanization.
Under this alternative, the priority of
land acquisition at Fern Cave Refuge
would remain focused on acquiring land
surrounding the fifth cave entrance
(Surprise Pit). Based on
recommendations from the Alabama
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation
Strategy, we would explore methods to
protect lands within the lower reaches
of Piney and Limestone Creeks close to
Wheeler Refuge and lands within the
Key Cave high risk water recharge zone
close to Key Cave Refuge.
Compatible wildlife-dependent
recreation activities would continue as
currently scheduled, but only when and
where they would not detract from, or
conflict with, wildlife management
activities and objectives. All Complex
lands would be closed at night to the
general public and select areas of high
waterfowl use on Wheeler Refuge would
be closed from November-March,
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
16814
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
reducing acreages for public hunting
and eliminating all night bank fishing.
Administration plans would stress the
need for increased maintenance of
existing infrastructure and construction
of new facilities, benefiting wildlife
conservation. Additional resources
would be required to accomplish the
goals of this alternative. Personnel
priorities would include employing
additional wildlife biologists, biological
technicians, maintenance workers, a law
enforcement officer, a contamination
specialist, and a forester.
Alternative D, our proposed
alternative, would balance wildlife/
habitat management and compatible
wildlife-dependent public use. It was
developed based on public comments
received during scoping, and the best
professional judgment of the Complex
staff, biological review team, public use
review team, and the comprehensive
conservation planning team. Under this
alternative, existing management
activities would continue and some
would be expanded.
This alternative would strive for a
balanced approach to addressing key
issues and refuge mandates, while
improving wildlife and habitat
management on each refuge in the
Complex. It is designed to optimize
habitat management for the restoration
and protection of the refuge’s biological
diversity, while providing a balance of
appropriate and compatible wildlifedependent recreational and educational
programs for visitors. Under Alternative
D, refuge lands would be more
intensively managed than at present to
provide high-quality habitat for wildlife,
particularly migratory birds. Areas
within the Complex with water control
capabilities would be managed for
moist-soil vegetation or would be forceaccount farmed (with 100 percent of
crops left standing) to benefit migratory
waterfowl. Cooperative farming fields
would be planted in corn or soybeans
(in order of preference) and flooded
during the late fall and winter.
Studies necessary to reduce impacts
of contaminants on fish, wildlife, and
plants would be developed and a
complex-wide litter control program
would be initiated. Research would also
be initiated to explore methods for
increasing conservation efforts for
threatened and endangered species on
Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and Fern Cave
Refuges.
A large majority of Complex lands
would be closed at night and select
areas of high waterfowl use on Wheeler
Refuge would be closed from NovemberMarch, slightly reducing acreages for
both public hunting and night bank
fishing. However, all six improved boat
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
launching facilities and several other
designated night bank fishing areas
would remain open at night. A free
night fishing permit would be required.
This action would help reduce illegal
activities and human disturbance to
wildlife.
Habitat management programs for
waterfowl impoundments, old field,
cropland, grassland, and forests would
be re-evaluated and step-down
management plans would be developed
or updated to meet the foraging, resting,
and breeding requirements for a variety
of species, particularly migratory birds.
Law enforcement activities to protect
resources and provide visitor safety
would be intensified and a study to
analyze the impacts of existing rights-ofway on resources would be initiated.
Results would determine if current
Complex policy concerning easements
should be altered. Coordination with
local planning and zoning departments
would be increased to help minimize
encroachment from urbanization. Under
this alternative, the priority of land
acquisition at Fern Cave Refuge would
remain focused on acquiring land
surrounding the fifth cave entrance
(Surprise Pit). Based on
recommendations from the Alabama
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation
Strategy, we would explore methods to
protect lands within the lower reaches
of Piney and Limestone Creeks close to
Wheeler Refuge and lands within the
Key Cave high risk water recharge zone
close to Key Cave Refuge.
Hunting and fishing would continue
with greater emphasis on increasing
opportunities and enhancing the quality
of the experience. At Wheeler Refuge,
the number of hunting days for small
game would be increased within the
state hunting season framework and an
additional youth fishing rodeo would be
held annually. Feral hogs would be
hunted during both the large game and
small game seasons. At Key Cave
Refuge, the hunting program would be
evaluated annually. Results would
dictate if the hunting program should be
expanded or reduced.
Increased wildlife observation and
photography opportunities would result
from the construction of four visitor
facilities (e.g., a photo blind, a wildlife
observation tower, a wildlife viewing
platform, and a wildlife drive) and the
rehabilitation of existing visitor
facilities. Environmental education and
interpretation would be expanded by
increasing the number of off-refuge
programs with local schools and by
constructing an environmental
education center at Wheeler Refuge.
New informational brochures would be
published for Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Fern Cave Refuges and visitor access
would be improved at Sauta Cave
Refuge. Administration plans would
balance restoration efforts between
habitat management and public use
needs. Additional resources would be
required to accomplish the goals of this
alternative. Personnel priorities would
include employing additional wildlife
biologists, biological technicians,
maintenance workers, assistant
managers, an education coordinator, a
law enforcement officer, and a
contamination specialist.
Some management programs would
occur regardless of which alternative is
selected for implementation. Features or
actions common to all four alternatives
are identified and summarized below.
• Fish and Aquatic Species—
Cooperation with the Alabama Division
of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries for
fisheries monitoring, implementing
aquatic habitat improvement projects,
and conducting game and non-game fish
surveys would continue and increase as
opportunities become available.
• Fire Management—Suppression of
all wildland fires would continue.
Prescribed fire may be used, in
conjunction with other refuge
management tools, to reduce hazard
fuels, restore natural processes and
vitality of ecosystems, improve wildlife
habitat, remove or reduce non-native
species, and conduct research.
• Monitoring—Existing migratory
bird monitoring, including waterfowl
surveys, bald eagle surveys, Christmas
bird counts, call counts, and breeding
bird surveys, would continue. More
specific monitoring activities may
increase to meet other objectives.
• Research—Special use permits
would be issued on a case-by-case basis
to universities, partners, and other
interested parties to perform
compatible, appropriate wildlife-related
research and/or surveying. Research
would continue to be encouraged to
evaluate contaminant levels and their
impacts on wildlife.
• Cultural Resource Protection—
Current cultural resource protection
efforts would continue, including a
partnership with the Tennessee Valley
Authority to conduct bank stabilization
projects at Wheeler Refuge. Efforts to
increase cultural resource protection
through education and inventories
would be explored.
• Partnerships—To aid and promote
refuge management programs, currently
established partnerships with agencies,
organizations, and individuals would
continue. Additional partnerships
would be welcomed.
• Volunteer Program—The volunteer
program would continue and would
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
grow as more individuals become
interested in volunteering.
• Private Lands Management—
Technical assistance for private land
management would continue to be
offered through the Service’s Partners
for Fish and Wildlife Program. Efforts to
expand the program would be explored.
• Restrictions/Limitations and
Prohibitions—All-terrain vehicle use
would continue to be prohibited on all
refuges in the Complex. Key Cave, Sauta
Cave, and Fern Cave Refuges would
continue to be closed at night and
horseback riding would continue to be
prohibited on these satellite refuges.
We will present the Draft CCP/EA to
the public at a meeting to be held at
Wheeler Refuge’s Visitor Center on U.S.
Highway 67, in Decatur, Alabama.
Mailings, newspaper articles, and
posters will be the avenues to inform
the public of the date and time for the
meeting. We will conduct the
environmental review of this project in
accordance with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.); NEPA Regulations (40 CFR parts
1500–1508); other appropriate Federal
laws and regulations; and our policies
and procedures for compliance with
those regulations. All comments
received become part of the official
public record. Requests for such
comments will be handled in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act NEPA (40 CFR
1506.6(f), and Departmental and Service
policies and procedures.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: February 8, 2007.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E7–6346 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Bureau of Indian Affairs
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of reservation
proclamation.
SUMMARY: This notice informs the public
that the Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs proclaimed approximately 56.50
acres, more or less, as an addition to the
17:37 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
The above-described lands, contain a
total of 56.40 acres, more or less,
officially designated the Boyd Ranch
Tract, within the Tierra Amarilla Grant,
New Mexico, as surveyed in 2003 by the
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau
of Land Management, Cadastral Survey,
and shown on the official plat of survey
and described in the official field note
record, both approved May 19, 2004,
and filed in the records of the Bureau of
Land Management, New Mexico State
Office, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, which
are subject to all valid rights,
reservations, rights-of-way, and
easements of record.
This proclamation does not affect title
to the land described above, nor does it
affect any valid existing easements for
public roads and highways, public
utilities and for railroads and pipelines
and any other rights-of-way or
reservations of record.
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
Proclaiming Certain Lands as
Reservation for the Jicarilla Apache
Nation of New Mexico
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Rio Arriba County, Boyd Ranch Tract,
within the Tierra Amarilla Grant, New
Mexico.
Dated: March 24, 2007.
Carl J. Artman,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7–6386 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AGENCY:
Jicarilla Apache Nation Reservation,
New Mexico.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben
Burshia, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Division of Real Estate Services, Mail
Stop 4639–MIB, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202)
208–7737.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published in the exercise of
authority delegated by the Secretary of
the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs by part 209 of the
Departmental Manual.
A proclamation was issued, according
with Section 7 of the Act of June 18,
1934 (48 Stat. 986; 25 U.S.C. § 467), for
the land described below. The land was
proclaimed to be the Jicarilla Apache
Nation Reservation for the exclusive use
of Indians on that reservation who are
entitled to reside at the reservation by
enrollment or tribal membership.
Proclaiming Certain Lands, Gomez
Ranch, as an Addition to the
Reservation for the Jicarilla Apache
Nation, New Mexico
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16815
Notice of Reservation
Proclamation.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice informs the public
that the Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs proclaimed approximately
5,696.64 acres, more or less, as an
addition to the Jicarilla Apache Nation
Reservation, New Mexico.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben
Burshia, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Division of Real Estate Services, Mail
Stop 4639–MIB, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202)
208–7737.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published in the exercise of
authority delegated by the Secretary of
the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs by part 209 of the
Departmental Manual.
A proclamation was issued, according
with Section 7 of the Act of June 18,
1934 (48 Stat. 986; 25 U.S.C. 467), for
the land described below. The land was
proclaimed to be an addition to the
Jicarilla Apache Nation Reservation for
the exclusive use of Indians on that
reservation who are entitled to reside at
the reservation by enrollment or tribal
membership.
New Mexico Principal Meridian
Rio Arriba County, New Mexico
The land descriptions and acreages listed
below for Township 31 North, Range 1 East,
and Township 31 North, Range 1 West, New
Mexico Principal Meridian, are based on the
official surveys conducted in 2005 by the
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management, Cadastral Survey, and
shown on the official plats of survey and
described in the official field note records, all
approved December 18, 2006, and filed in the
records of the Bureau of Land Management,
New Mexico State Office, in Santa Fe, New
Mexico.
Township 31 North, Range 1 East, N.M.P.M.
Section 18: NE/4SW/4, W/2SE/4, SE/4SE/
4 (Containing 167.09 acres, more or less);
Section 19: Lots 3 and 4, E/2SW/4, SE/4,
S/2NE/4, NW/4NE/4, NE/4NW/4
(Containing 496.37 acres, more or less);
Section 27: SW/4 (Containing 159.94 acres,
more or less);
Section 28: NW/4SW/4, S/2SW/4
(Containing 124.53 acres, more or less);
Section 29: N/2, NE/4SE/4 (Containing
357.41 acres, more or less);
Section 30: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, E/2W/2, NE/
4 (Containing 483.91 acres, more or less);
Section 31: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, E/2W/2, E/
2 (Containing 648.03 acres, more or less);
Section 32: All (Containing 648.22 acres,
more or less);
Section 33: All (Containing 641.68 acres,
more or less);
Section 34: Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, SW/4
(Containing 322.46 acres, more or less)
The total area of this tract located in
Township 31 North, Range 1 East, N.M.P.M.,
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16811-16815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6346]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge
Complex in Limestone, Madison, and Morgan Counties, AL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft
CCP/EA) for Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge Complex is available for
review and comment. The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration
Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, requires the Service to develop a CCP for each
national wildlife refuge. This Draft CCP, when final, will describe how
we intend to manage the
[[Page 16812]]
Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge Complex over the next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your comments no later
than May 7, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information to: John
Beck, Natural Resource Planner, Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 2700 Refuge Headquarters Road, Decatur, AL 35603; Telephone
256/353-7243 ext. 32. Your comments may be sent electronically to:
John--Beck@fws.gov with a subject line, ``Draft CCP Comments: Wheeler
NWR Complex.'' The Draft CCP/EA may be accessed and downloaded from the
Service's Internet Web site https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge Complex
is currently comprised of seven refuges, spreading across 12,500 square
miles of northern Alabama. In addition, the Wheeler Complex administers
five Farm Service Agency conservation easement tracts. This draft plan
covers four of the seven refuges. These refuges and their establishing
dates are as follows: Wheeler (1938); Key Cave (1997); Sauta Cave,
formerly known as Blowing Wind Cave (1978); and Fern Cave (1981). The
other three refuges, Cahaba River (2002), Mountain Longleaf (2003), and
Watercress Darter (1980), will be addressed at a later date in a
separate comprehensive conservation plan.
Wheeler Refuge is located among the cities of Athens, Decatur, and
Huntsville. The refuge was established in 1938 by Executive Order 7926
as a breeding ground for migratory birds and other wildlife. Additional
purposes were added later under the authorities of the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act of 1929, and the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962. This
37,000-acre refuge is overlaid on the middle third of the Tennessee
Valley Authority's Wheeler Reservoir with property in Limestone,
Madison, and Morgan Counties. Refuge lands were acquired in 1934 and
1935 by the Tennessee Valley Authority to serve as a buffer strip for
the reservoir, which was impounded a year later in 1936.
Considered the eastern most national wildlife refuge in the
Mississippi Flyway, Wheeler provides winter habitat for the state's
largest duck population and formerly supported the southernmost and
Alabama's only major concentration of wintering Canada geese. Snow
geese are now the most prominent component of the winter goose
population.
The refuge consists of approximately 25,950 acres of land and
11,250 acres of water. Habitats consist of bottomland hardwoods, mixed
hardwoods, pine uplands, shallow water embayments, and agricultural
fields that support interesting flora; a bird list of 288 species; and
a wide variety of mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and fishes. It is well
developed with more than 100 miles of graveled roads, 2,500 acres of
managed wetlands, a modern Headquarters Complex with a large Visitor
Center and a Waterfowl Observation Building. Approximately 700,000
visitors are reported annually.
Key Cave Refuge was established in 1997 under the authority of the
Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and
the National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act of 1966 to ensure that
the biological integrity of Key Cave, Collier Cave, and Collier Bone
Cave remains intact. Key Cave is the only known refuge for the
federally endangered Alabama cavefish (Speoplatyrhinus poulsoni). It is
on the northern shore of Pickwick Lake in a limestone karst area that
contains numerous sinkholes and several underground cave systems. The
area's sinkholes are an integral component of groundwater recharge to
the caves.
Prior to 1992, the Monsanto Company owned a large 1,060-acre-tract
of land just north of Key Cave and about five miles southwest of
Florence, Lauderdale County, Alabama, in the high hazard risk area of
the Key Cave Aquifer. In 1992 the company sold this tract to The
Conservation Fund. Five years later, the Service acquired the land and
established Key Cave Refuge.
In addition to the Alabama cavefish, Key Cave Refuge also serves as
a priority one maternity cave for the federally endangered gray bat
(Myotis grisescens), as well as habitat for two species of blind
crayfish (Procambarus pecki and Cambarus jonesi). Collier Cave, located
approximately 1.5 miles upstream from Key Cave, and Collier Bone Cave
are also considered potential habitat for these cave species. Cave
entrances are located on Tennessee Valley Authority lands on the
northern shore of Pickwick Lake. Furthermore, the refuge provides
habitat for a variety of migratory and resident wildlife species.
Several priority bird species commonly occurring on the refuge include:
dickcissel, grasshopper sparrow, field sparrow, northern bobwhite,
northern harrier, and short-eared owl.
Sauta Cave Refuge, known as Blowing Wind Cave Refuge until 1999,
lies just above the Sauty Creek embayment of the Tennessee Valley
Authority's Guntersville Reservoir, seven miles west of Scottsboro,
Jackson County, Alabama. The refuge consists of 264 acres of hardwood
forest established in 1978 under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 to provide protection for the federally endangered
gray bat and the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) and their crucial
habitat. The cave provides a summer roosting site for about 300,000-
400,000 gray bats and a winter hibernaculum for both bats.
Besides the endangered bats, many other species occur in the cave,
including the Tennessee cave salamander (Gyrinophilus palleucus) and
the cave salamander (Eurycea lucifuga). Additionally, a relatively
large population (>250 individuals) of Price's potato-bean (Apios
priceana), a federally threatened plant species, is found on the
refuge. The cave has upper and lower gated entrances and 14,628 feet of
mapped passage. Formations in the lower cave have been described as
spectacular and petroglyphs have been found on the cave ceilings. The
cave was used as a saltpeter mine during the civil war, a nightclub
during the 1920s, and a fallout shelter during the 1960s. All 264 acres
of habitat outside of the cave are predominately hardwood forest.
Fern Cave Refuge was established in 1981 under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide protection for the endangered
gray bat and the Indiana bat. The refuge is 20 miles west of Scottsboro
and two miles northeast of Paint Rock in Jackson County, Alabama, and
consists of 199 acres of forested hillside underlain by a massive cave
with many stalactite- and stalagmite-filled rooms. An additional 299
acres of land are included in the approved acquisition boundary of the
refuge.
The cave itself has five hidden entrances, with four of these
currently occurring on the refuge. The fifth entrance (Surprise Pit) is
within the approved acquisition boundary for the refuge. Recent
estimates indicate that one million gray bats hibernate in the cave,
making it the largest wintering colony of gray bats in the United
States. In the past, the threatened American Hart's-tongue fern
(Phyllitis scolopendrum var. americana) has been found on the refuge.
Significant issues addressed in the draft plan include: threatened
and endangered species conservation; waterfowl management; wildlife
monitoring and population surveys, invasive/exotic species control;
bottomland hardwood restoration; agriculture; visitor services (e.g.,
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and
[[Page 16813]]
environmental education and interpretation); funding and staffing;
cultural resources protection; land and visitor protection; urban
encroachment; and water quality issues. We developed four alternatives
for managing the Wheeler Complex and chose Alternative D as the
proposed alternative. These alternatives are briefly described as
follows:
Alternative A, the no-action alternative, would continue current
Complex management practices. We would not initiate any significant
changes. Management emphasis would continue to focus on maintaining
biological integrity of habitats found on each refuge in the Complex.
All management actions would be directed towards achieving the
Complex's primary purposes, including (1) conserving wintering
waterfowl habitat; (2) meeting the habitat conservation goals of
national and international plans; and (3) conserving wetlands, all
while contributing to other national, regional, and state goals to
protect and restore migratory birds, threatened and endangered species,
and resident species. Alternative A represents the anticipated
conditions of each refuge for the next 15 years assuming current
policies, programs, and activities continue.
Refuge management programs would continue to be developed and
implemented with limited baseline biological information. Active
habitat management would be conducted through water level manipulations
and moist-soil, cropland, and forest management designed to provide a
diverse complex of habitats that meets the foraging, resting, and
breeding requirements for a variety of species. Hunting and fishing
would continue to be major focuses of the public use program, with no
expansion of current opportunities. Current restrictions or
prohibitions would remain. Environmental education, wildlife
observation, and wildlife photography would be accommodated at present
levels.
Alternative B would maximize compatible wildlife-dependent public
use. It would provide for more public use recreational opportunities,
while maintaining current habitat and wildlife management programs.
Additional staff and/or resources would be dedicated to increasing
compatible wildlife-dependent public use opportunities. Most habitat
management programs, including the cooperative farming program, would
continue; however, habitat improvement projects that would benefit
compatible wildlife-dependent public use opportunities would be given a
higher priority. Law enforcement activities to provide visitor safety
would be intensified.
Under this alternative, hunting and fishing opportunities would be
expanded. At Wheeler Refuge, the number of hunting days for small game
would be increased within the state hunting season framework and two
additional youth fishing rodeos would be held annually. The 2,000 acres
around Garth Slough, presently closed to all public entry from November
15 through January 15, would be evaluated for the possible opening of
portions of the upland areas to public access under existing gate
closure policy; thereby providing additional hunting and other public
use opportunities. In addition, the hunting of feral hogs would be
allowed during both the large game and small game seasons. At Key Cave
Refuge, feral hogs would be added to the hunting permit and other
hunting opportunities would be explored annually.
Increased wildlife observation and photography opportunities would
result from the construction of nine new visitor facilities (e.g.,
three photo blinds, three wildlife observation towers, a wildlife
viewing platform, a nature trail, and a wildlife drive) and the
rehabilitation of existing visitor facilities. Environmental education
and interpretation would be expanded by increasing the number of off-
refuge programs with local schools and by constructing a new
environmental education center at Wheeler Refuge. New informational
brochures would be published for Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and Fern Cave
Refuges and visitor access would be improved at Sauta Cave Refuge.
Additional resources would be required to accomplish the goals of
this alternative. Personnel priorities would include employing
additional education specialists, wildlife biologists, a law
enforcement officer, and an education coordinator.
Alternative C would maximize wildlife/habitat management by
providing for the restoration of native wildlife, fish, and plant
communities and the health of those communities, while maintaining
current public use opportunities. Federally listed species would be of
primary concern, but needs of other resident and migratory wildlife
would also be considered. At each refuge, extensive wildlife, plant,
and habitat inventories would be initiated to obtain the biological
information needed to implement and monitor management programs.
Studies necessary to reduce impacts of contaminants to fish,
wildlife, and plants would be developed and a complex-wide litter
control program would be initiated. Research would also be initiated to
explore methods for increasing conservation efforts for threatened and
endangered species on Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and Fern Cave Refuges.
Habitat management programs for waterfowl impoundments, old field,
cropland, grassland, and forests would be re-evaluated and step-down
management plans would be developed or updated to meet the foraging,
resting, and breeding requirements for a variety of species,
particularly migratory birds. Any areas within the Complex with pumping
capabilities and water control structures would be managed for moist-
soil vegetation, or would be farmed (with 100 percent of crops left
standing) to benefit migratory waterfowl. Cooperative farming would be
eliminated and all farming activities would be conducted via contracts
or force account using Complex staff and equipment. Farming fields
would be planted in milo, corn, or soybeans (in order of preference)
and flooded during the late fall and winter. Beaver control would be
increased by expanding the contract with USDA's Wildlife Services and
forestry management would be increased.
Law enforcement activities to protect trust resources would be
intensified and a study to analyze the impacts of existing rights-of-
way on refuge resources would be initiated. Results would determine if
current Complex policy concerning easements should be altered.
Coordination with local planning and zoning departments would be
increased to help minimize encroachment from urbanization.
Under this alternative, the priority of land acquisition at Fern
Cave Refuge would remain focused on acquiring land surrounding the
fifth cave entrance (Surprise Pit). Based on recommendations from the
Alabama Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy, we would explore
methods to protect lands within the lower reaches of Piney and
Limestone Creeks close to Wheeler Refuge and lands within the Key Cave
high risk water recharge zone close to Key Cave Refuge.
Compatible wildlife-dependent recreation activities would continue
as currently scheduled, but only when and where they would not detract
from, or conflict with, wildlife management activities and objectives.
All Complex lands would be closed at night to the general public and
select areas of high waterfowl use on Wheeler Refuge would be closed
from November-March,
[[Page 16814]]
reducing acreages for public hunting and eliminating all night bank
fishing.
Administration plans would stress the need for increased
maintenance of existing infrastructure and construction of new
facilities, benefiting wildlife conservation. Additional resources
would be required to accomplish the goals of this alternative.
Personnel priorities would include employing additional wildlife
biologists, biological technicians, maintenance workers, a law
enforcement officer, a contamination specialist, and a forester.
Alternative D, our proposed alternative, would balance wildlife/
habitat management and compatible wildlife-dependent public use. It was
developed based on public comments received during scoping, and the
best professional judgment of the Complex staff, biological review
team, public use review team, and the comprehensive conservation
planning team. Under this alternative, existing management activities
would continue and some would be expanded.
This alternative would strive for a balanced approach to addressing
key issues and refuge mandates, while improving wildlife and habitat
management on each refuge in the Complex. It is designed to optimize
habitat management for the restoration and protection of the refuge's
biological diversity, while providing a balance of appropriate and
compatible wildlife-dependent recreational and educational programs for
visitors. Under Alternative D, refuge lands would be more intensively
managed than at present to provide high-quality habitat for wildlife,
particularly migratory birds. Areas within the Complex with water
control capabilities would be managed for moist-soil vegetation or
would be force-account farmed (with 100 percent of crops left standing)
to benefit migratory waterfowl. Cooperative farming fields would be
planted in corn or soybeans (in order of preference) and flooded during
the late fall and winter.
Studies necessary to reduce impacts of contaminants on fish,
wildlife, and plants would be developed and a complex-wide litter
control program would be initiated. Research would also be initiated to
explore methods for increasing conservation efforts for threatened and
endangered species on Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and Fern Cave Refuges.
A large majority of Complex lands would be closed at night and
select areas of high waterfowl use on Wheeler Refuge would be closed
from November-March, slightly reducing acreages for both public hunting
and night bank fishing. However, all six improved boat launching
facilities and several other designated night bank fishing areas would
remain open at night. A free night fishing permit would be required.
This action would help reduce illegal activities and human disturbance
to wildlife.
Habitat management programs for waterfowl impoundments, old field,
cropland, grassland, and forests would be re-evaluated and step-down
management plans would be developed or updated to meet the foraging,
resting, and breeding requirements for a variety of species,
particularly migratory birds.
Law enforcement activities to protect resources and provide visitor
safety would be intensified and a study to analyze the impacts of
existing rights-of-way on resources would be initiated. Results would
determine if current Complex policy concerning easements should be
altered. Coordination with local planning and zoning departments would
be increased to help minimize encroachment from urbanization. Under
this alternative, the priority of land acquisition at Fern Cave Refuge
would remain focused on acquiring land surrounding the fifth cave
entrance (Surprise Pit). Based on recommendations from the Alabama
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy, we would explore methods
to protect lands within the lower reaches of Piney and Limestone Creeks
close to Wheeler Refuge and lands within the Key Cave high risk water
recharge zone close to Key Cave Refuge.
Hunting and fishing would continue with greater emphasis on
increasing opportunities and enhancing the quality of the experience.
At Wheeler Refuge, the number of hunting days for small game would be
increased within the state hunting season framework and an additional
youth fishing rodeo would be held annually. Feral hogs would be hunted
during both the large game and small game seasons. At Key Cave Refuge,
the hunting program would be evaluated annually. Results would dictate
if the hunting program should be expanded or reduced.
Increased wildlife observation and photography opportunities would
result from the construction of four visitor facilities (e.g., a photo
blind, a wildlife observation tower, a wildlife viewing platform, and a
wildlife drive) and the rehabilitation of existing visitor facilities.
Environmental education and interpretation would be expanded by
increasing the number of off-refuge programs with local schools and by
constructing an environmental education center at Wheeler Refuge. New
informational brochures would be published for Key Cave, Sauta Cave,
and Fern Cave Refuges and visitor access would be improved at Sauta
Cave Refuge. Administration plans would balance restoration efforts
between habitat management and public use needs. Additional resources
would be required to accomplish the goals of this alternative.
Personnel priorities would include employing additional wildlife
biologists, biological technicians, maintenance workers, assistant
managers, an education coordinator, a law enforcement officer, and a
contamination specialist.
Some management programs would occur regardless of which
alternative is selected for implementation. Features or actions common
to all four alternatives are identified and summarized below.
Fish and Aquatic Species--Cooperation with the Alabama
Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries for fisheries monitoring,
implementing aquatic habitat improvement projects, and conducting game
and non-game fish surveys would continue and increase as opportunities
become available.
Fire Management--Suppression of all wildland fires would
continue. Prescribed fire may be used, in conjunction with other refuge
management tools, to reduce hazard fuels, restore natural processes and
vitality of ecosystems, improve wildlife habitat, remove or reduce non-
native species, and conduct research.
Monitoring--Existing migratory bird monitoring, including
waterfowl surveys, bald eagle surveys, Christmas bird counts, call
counts, and breeding bird surveys, would continue. More specific
monitoring activities may increase to meet other objectives.
Research--Special use permits would be issued on a case-
by-case basis to universities, partners, and other interested parties
to perform compatible, appropriate wildlife-related research and/or
surveying. Research would continue to be encouraged to evaluate
contaminant levels and their impacts on wildlife.
Cultural Resource Protection--Current cultural resource
protection efforts would continue, including a partnership with the
Tennessee Valley Authority to conduct bank stabilization projects at
Wheeler Refuge. Efforts to increase cultural resource protection
through education and inventories would be explored.
Partnerships--To aid and promote refuge management
programs, currently established partnerships with agencies,
organizations, and individuals would continue. Additional partnerships
would be welcomed.
Volunteer Program--The volunteer program would continue
and would
[[Page 16815]]
grow as more individuals become interested in volunteering.
Private Lands Management--Technical assistance for private
land management would continue to be offered through the Service's
Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program. Efforts to expand the program
would be explored.
Restrictions/Limitations and Prohibitions--All-terrain
vehicle use would continue to be prohibited on all refuges in the
Complex. Key Cave, Sauta Cave, and Fern Cave Refuges would continue to
be closed at night and horseback riding would continue to be prohibited
on these satellite refuges.
We will present the Draft CCP/EA to the public at a meeting to be
held at Wheeler Refuge's Visitor Center on U.S. Highway 67, in Decatur,
Alabama. Mailings, newspaper articles, and posters will be the avenues
to inform the public of the date and time for the meeting. We will
conduct the environmental review of this project in accordance with the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); NEPA Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-
1508); other appropriate Federal laws and regulations; and our policies
and procedures for compliance with those regulations. All comments
received become part of the official public record. Requests for such
comments will be handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information
Act NEPA (40 CFR 1506.6(f), and Departmental and Service policies and
procedures.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: February 8, 2007.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E7-6346 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P