Radio Broadcasting Services; Clinchco, VA and Coal Run, KY, 16315 [E7-6258]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 4, 2007 / Proposed Rules
appropriate? Should reporting units be
dependent on the reproductive
methodology of the crop (e.g., seeds,
bulbs, or tubers)? Given your response
to Unit IV.1.a., what types of production
reporting would provide the Agency
with information valuable for
compliance assurance purposes and for
managing any potential risks associated
with a violation?
c. Recordkeeping and inspection (Unit
III.3.). What establishments or other
locations are appropriate to be inspected
for records and samples, and what
records would be appropriate for
producers of PIPs to maintain?
d. Labeling (Unit III.4.). Please
comment on current labeling practices
for PIPs. Are current labeling practices
sufficient? For example, do grower
agreements offer sufficient information
and compliance assurance to ensure
registered PIPs are used in a manner
that protects human health and the
environment? Are there circumstances
where labeling different from that
currently in practice for PIPs may be
appropriate?
e. Experimental use permits (Unit
III.5.). Are there aspects of production in
association with PIP EUPs that are
different from production associated
with other types of pesticides used in
EUPs? If there are differences, how
should they be addressed for PIP EUPs?
f. Production for export (Unit III.6.).
What conditions would ensure that a
PIP is intended for export only, and
what would be necessary for such a PIP
to meet the requirements of FIFRA?
2. Are there other characteristics not
described in this document unique to
PIPs that may affect the application of
the existing regulations associated with
pesticide establishments and pesticide
production to PIP producers?
3. Are there additional sections of
FIFRA implementing regulations related
to pesticide establishment and
production regulations that should be
modified to more effectively address the
unique characteristics of PIPs?
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
V. Do Any Statutory or Executive Order
Reviews Apply to this Action?
Under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that ANPRMs are
considered ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ under section 3(f) of the
Executive Order. The Agency therefore
submitted this document to OMB for the
10–day review period afforded under
this Executive order. Any changes made
in response to OMB comments during
that review have been documented in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Apr 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
the docket as required by the Executive
order.
Since this ANPRM does not impose or
propose any requirements, and instead
seeks comments and suggestions for the
Agency to consider in possibly
developing a subsequent proposed rule,
the various other review requirements
that apply when an agency imposes
requirements do not apply to this
action.
As part of your comments on this
ANPRM, you may include any
comments or information that you have
regarding this action. In particular, any
comments or information that would
help the Agency to assess the potential
impact of a rule on small entities
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); to
consider voluntary consensus standards
pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note);
to consider environmental health or
safety effects on children pursuant to
Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); or
to consider human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations pursuant to
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). The Agency will
consider such comments during the
development of any subsequent notice
of proposed rulemaking as it takes
appropriate steps to address any
applicable requirements.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 152,
156, 167, 168, 169, 172, 174
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests, Plant-incorporated
protectants, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–6151 Filed 4–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
PO 00000
16315
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07–1350; MB Docket No. 04–319; RM–
10984]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Clinchco, VA and Coal Run, KY
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule, denial.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document denies a
petition for rule making filed by East
Kentucky Broadcasting Corp.
(‘‘Petitioner’’) proposing to substitute
Channel 221C3 for Channel 276A at
Coal Run and modify the license of
Station WPKE–FM to reflect the channel
upgrade. To accommodate the channel
upgrade, Petitioner proposes to
substitute Channel 276A for Channel
221A at Clinchco, Virginia and modify
the license of Station WDIC–FM to
reflect the channel substitution.
However, Petitioner’s proposed site is
unacceptable due to major terrain
obstruction that prevents the requisite
70 dBu signal over the entire
community of license.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418–
2177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Report
and Order, MB Docket No. 04–319,
adopted March 16, 2007, and released
March 20, 2007. The full text of this
Commission decision is available for
inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC’s Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445
Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of this decision may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 1–800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com.
This document is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act. (The
Commission, is, therefore, not required
to submit a copy of this Report and
Order to the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A)
because the proposed rule is denied.)
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7–6258 Filed 4–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6258]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07-1350; MB Docket No. 04-319; RM-10984]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Clinchco, VA and Coal Run, KY
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule, denial.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document denies a petition for rule making filed by East
Kentucky Broadcasting Corp. (``Petitioner'') proposing to substitute
Channel 221C3 for Channel 276A at Coal Run and modify the license of
Station WPKE-FM to reflect the channel upgrade. To accommodate the
channel upgrade, Petitioner proposes to substitute Channel 276A for
Channel 221A at Clinchco, Virginia and modify the license of Station
WDIC-FM to reflect the channel substitution. However, Petitioner's
proposed site is unacceptable due to major terrain obstruction that
prevents the requisite 70 dBu signal over the entire community of
license.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418-
2177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-319, adopted March 16, 2007, and
released March 20, 2007. The full text of this Commission decision is
available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at
the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street,
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com.
This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The
Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Report
and Order to the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the
proposed rule is denied.)
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7-6258 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P