Plant-Incorporated Protectants; Potential Revisions to Current Production Regulations, 16312-16315 [E7-6151]
Download as PDF
16312
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 4, 2007 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 152, 156, 167, 168, 169,
172, and 174
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–1003; FRL–8118–2]
RIN 2070–AJ32
Plant-Incorporated Protectants;
Potential Revisions to Current
Production Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In light of the differences
between plant-incorporated protectants
(PIPs) and other types of pesticides, EPA
is considering amendments to the
current pesticide establishment and
production regulations promulgated
under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), and to other related FIFRA
regulations as needed for producers of
PIPs. PIPs are pesticidal substances that
are intended to be produced and used
in a living plant, or the produce thereof,
and the genetic material necessary for
the production of such a pesticidal
substance, and also include any inert
ingredient contained in the plant, or the
produce thereof. Given these
characteristics, it is possible that PIPs
may not be produced in the manner
contemplated when the current
establishment and production
regulations were promulgated for other
types of pesticide. In this ANPRM, the
Agency provides a list of the general
regulatory provisions applicable to PIPs
that EPA is considering amending and
solicits public comment on the
completeness of the list and the scope
of any potential changes to these
regulations. EPA also is soliciting
information that may be useful to EPA
as it reviews these regulations and
developing the proposed rules. In
addition to soliciting comments through
this ANPRM, EPA intends to solicit
stakeholder input through two public
meetings during the comment period of
this ANPRM.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–1003, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Apr 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–
1003. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
in regulations.gov. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
web site to view the docket index or
access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Howie, Hazard Assessment
Coordination and Policy Division
(7202M), Office of Science Coordination
and Policy, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–4146; fax
number: (202) 564–8502; e-mail address:
howie.stephen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
process, or use PIPs. In order to identify
potentially impacted industries the
analysis relies on North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes. Potentially affected
entities may include, but are not limited
to:
• Pesticide and Other Agricultural
Chemical Manufacturing (NAICS code
325320). This industry comprises
establishments that are producing PIPs
intended for distribution and sale as
pesticides.
• Crop Production (NAICS code 111).
These are establishments such as farms,
orchards, groves, greenhouses, and
nurseries, primarily engaged in growing
crops, plants, vines, or trees and their
seeds.
• Colleges, Universities, and
Professional Schools (NAICS code
611310). This industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
furnishing academic courses and
granting degrees at baccalaureate or
graduate levels. Furthermore, they may
comprise establishments where research
on PIPs occurs and where PIPs may be
grown.
• Research and Development in the
Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
(NAICS code 54171). This industry
comprises establishments primarily
engaged in conducting research and
experimental development in the
physical, engineering, or life sciences,
such as agriculture, environmental,
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 4, 2007 / Proposed Rules
biology, botany, biotechnology, forests,
and other allied subjects.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Docket. EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–1003.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Apr 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
PIPs are ‘‘pesticidal substances that
are intended to be produced and used
in a living plant, or the produce thereof,
and the genetic material necessary for
the production of such a pesticidal
substance. PIPs also include any inert
ingredient contained in the plant, or the
produce thereof.’’ (40 CFR 174.3) By
definition, PIPs are primarily
distinguished from other types of
pesticides because they are intended to
be produced and used in the living
plant. Other types of pesticides are
primarily produced in a facility and
used through physical application, e.g.,
spraying or dusting of the plant. Since
PIPs were not defined when the existing
regulations associated with pesticide
establishments and pesticide production
were promulgated, the existing
regulations may not adequately address
this distinction.
The Agency is therefore considering
amending the current FIFRA regulations
associated with pesticide establishments
and pesticide production to better
address PIPs and PIP production given
the unique characteristics of PIPs
compared to other types of pesticides.
EPA is soliciting comments from
interested stakeholders on the issues
and questions identified in this
ANPRM. EPA intends to use this
information in reviewing these
regulations and developing its proposed
rules.
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
EPA has regulatory authority to
promulgate regulations under FIFRA
sections 3(a), 8(a), 25(a), and 25(b) (7
U.S.C. 136a(a), 136f(a), 136w(a), and
136w(b)).
PIPs are pesticides under FIFRA
section 2 because they are introduced
into plants with the intention of
‘‘preventing, destroying, repelling, or
mitigating any pest...’’ (7 U.S.C. 136(u)).
Under FIFRA section 7, any person
who manufactures, prepares,
compounds, propagates, or processes
any pesticide is a ‘‘producer.’’
‘‘Produce,’’ as further described in in 40
CFR 167.3, also means to package,
repackage, label, relabel, or otherwise
change the container of any pesticide.
FIFRA section 7 requires that producers
of pesticides register the establishments
where production occurs and requires
that producers report their annual
production (7 U. S. C. 136e). In
addition, producers of pesticides are
required under FIFRA section 8(a) to
maintain records with respect to their
operations, and to make such records
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16313
available for inspection (7 U.S.C.
136f(a)). Under FIFRA section 9
appropriately credentialed inspectors
have the authority to conduct
inspections at pesticide producing
establishments or other places where
pesticides are being held for distribution
or sale for the purpose of inspecting and
obtaining samples (7 U.S.C. 136g).
C. Why is the Agency Considering
Amending the Regulations?
EPA believes that the existing
regulations need to be amended to better
address apparent differences between
PIPs and other types of pesticides in the
application of FIFRA’s production and
production-related requirements. The
existing regulations were written for
pesticides that are generally produced
and used in a more traditional manner,
e.g., spraying or dusting onto the plants.
PIPs are produced and used in a living
plant, which raises questions regarding
how that ‘‘production’’ should be
regulated under the existing authorities
of FIFRA. In general, EPA’s experience
with PIPs is that they present different
and potentially lower risk situations
compared to chemical pesticides.
However, EPA needs to ensure that
appropriate PIP production data are
available to manage any potential risk a
PIP might pose.
The United States Government
published in the Federal Register issue
of June 26, 1986 (51 FR 23302) a
document entitled, Coordinated
Framework for Regulation of
Biotechnology (‘‘Coordinated
Framework’’), which describes in broad
terms the Federal Government’s
approach to regulating biotechnology
products. In that document, the Federal
Government concluded that it could
appropriately regulate the products of
biotechnology under existing laws, but
recognized that, in some cases, new
regulations might be needed. Consistent
with the Coordinated Framework, EPA
regulates PIPs under its pesticide
authorities. In the Federal Register issue
of July 19, 2001 (66 FR 37771) (FRL–
6057–7), EPA published a rule that
established a regulatory framework for
PIPs. That rule clarified the relationship
between plants and PIPs under FIFRA,
exempted from FIFRA requirements
PIPs derived entirely through
conventional breeding between sexually
compatible plants, established a new
part in the Code of Federal Regulations
specifically for PIPs (40 CFR part 174),
provided requirements for reporting of
adverse effects, and set forth certain
procedures for CBI. In that Federal
Register document, EPA also
anticipated the future need for
proposing regulations tailored
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
16314
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 4, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
specifically to PIPs so that the
regulatory framework would better fit
their unique characteristics (66 FR
37807). EPA indicated that it would
continue to apply existing regulations to
PIPs, except where superseded by the
regulations in the July 19, 2001 Final
Rule, until the Agency could develop
additional regulations specifically
tailored to PIPs.
Since the mid-1990s, EPA has
approved a number of PIP experimental
use permits (EUPs) under FIFRA section
5, as well as seed increase and
commercial use registrations under
FIFRA section 3. During this time, EPA
has registered facilities involved in the
production of PIPs as pesticide
producing establishments under FIFRA
section 7. These have included, for
example, sites of the original
transformation (where plant tissue was
transformed by the insertion of PIP
genetic material) and seed processing
facilities.
FIFRA section 7 requires that
producers of pesticides register the
establishments where the pesticide is
produced and report the amount of
pesticide produced. EPA’s experience to
date has demonstrated, particularly in
the area of pesticide production, that the
existing regulations (e.g., 40 CFR part
167) may need to be better tailored to
address PIPs. For example, existing
regulations require pesticide production
quantities to be reported in terms of
volume or weight (gallons or pounds),
measurements that are not useful when
considering a pesticidal substance
produced within a plant. Other
questions concern the manner in which
PIPs are increased within a living plant.
Such increase occurs at many stages
from product development through use,
which raises questions concerning
where pesticide production occurs, and
what establishments must register and
report their production. Clarification of
this matter would help to ensure that
appropriate persons comply with
production related requirements, and
that other persons do not face
unnecessary regulatory burden. To that
end, EPA is reviewing the existing
regulations in 40 CFR chapter I,
subchapter E and considering potential
regulatory changes to address the
apparent differences between PIPs and
other types of pesticides.
III. Current Regulations Under Review
EPA is considering amending the
following existing regulations related to
pesticide establishment and production
to better address PIPs and PIP
production:
1. Registration of establishments
where PIPs are produced (FIFRA section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Apr 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
7 and 40 CFR 167.20). Current
regulations require any producer of a
pesticide to register the ‘‘production’’
site with EPA. The statutory and
regulatory definitions of ‘‘produce’’
include several activities, including
manufacturing, preparing,
compounding, propagating, or
processing any pesticide or packaging,
repackaging, labeling, and relabeling the
container of any pesticide.
2. Reporting by registered production
establishments (FIFRA section 7 and 40
CFR 167.85). Current regulations require
a producer operating a producing
establishment to report annually the
types and amount of each pesticidal
product that was produced, sold, or
distributed the previous year and to
estimate the amount that will be
produced during the current year.
3. Recordkeeping and inspection
authority (FIFRA sections 8 and 9 and
40 CFR 169.2 and 169.3). EPA’s
statutory authority under FIFRA section
8, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, require pesticide producers,
registrants, and applicants for
registration to maintain certain records
related to pesticide production (i.e.,
including information regarding the
production, receipt, and shipment of
pesticides) and to provide these records
upon request to appropriately
credentialed inspectors. FIFRA section 8
also provides authority for appropriately
credentialed inspectors to conduct
inspections to access such information.
Furthermore, under FIFRA section 9
appropriately credentialed inspectors
have the authority to conduct
inspections at pesticide producing
establishments or other places where
pesticides are being held for distribution
or sale for the purpose of inspecting and
obtaining samples.
4. Labeling on PIP containers (FIFRA
section 2 and 40 CFR 156.10). The
statute and current regulations provide
requirements for labeling of pesticides,
including name of the product, identity
of the producer, net content, product
registration number, establishment
registration number, ingredient
statement, hazard and precautionary
statements, directions for use, and use
classification. Currently, PIPs are
labeled for FIFRA section 5 EUPs and
FIFRA section 3 seed increase
registrations only.
5. EUPs for field testing of
unregistered PIPs (FIFRA section 5 and
40 CFR part 172). FIFRA allows for field
testing of unregistered pesticides under
an EUP. Any pesticide production
activity related to an EUP, either the
production of a pesticide for use in an
EUP or by being produced as a result of
an EUP, is subject to FIFRA production
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
establishment and recordkeeping
requirements.
6. Production of unregistered PIPs for
export (FIFRA section 17 and 40 CFR
168.65–168.85). FIFRA exempts
pesticides intended solely for export
from certain FIFRA requirements,
including product registration
requirements. Products intended for
export only are therefore not subject to
the product safety evaluation required
of products intended for domestic
distribution and sale. However, they
must still comply with the producer
establishment registration, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of FIFRA
sections 7 and 8 and are subject to
certain labeling requirements, e.g., their
label must include the statement: ‘‘Not
Registered for Use in the United States
of America.’’
IV. Request for Comments
EPA is seeking public comment on
the completeness of the list of current
regulations that need to be reviewed for
applicability to PIPs and PIP producers
(see Unit III.), and is soliciting related
information to use in reviewing these
regulations and developing its proposed
rules. These issues are especially
challenging for PIPs, since based on
statutory and regulatory definitions, the
borders between production and use are
unclear. EPA is seeking public input to
help inform decisions on how best to
ensure appropriate compliance without
imposing unnecessarily burdensome
reporting or labeling requirements on
PIP registrants, producers, distributors,
and users.
1. EPA would like comments in
response to the following questions with
respect to the regulations referenced in
Unit III.:
a. Registration of establishments (Unit
III.1.). Given that PIPs by definition are
intended to be produced and used in a
living plant, what activities should the
Agency consider to be part of
‘‘production’’ as that term is defined in
FIFRA (which includes manufacturing,
preparing, compounding, propagating,
or processing any pesticide or
packaging, repackaging, labeling, and
relabeling the container), and what
establishments should be registered to
help EPA manage any potential risks
associated with PIPs? What other types
of facilities, if any (e.g., growers
involved in seed production), involved
in the development of PIP-containing
varieties should be subject to these
requirements? Please explain the reason
for your response.
b. Production reporting (Unit III.2.).
What production reporting, by whom
and in what units (e.g., volume, weight,
number of seeds, etc.) would be
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 4, 2007 / Proposed Rules
appropriate? Should reporting units be
dependent on the reproductive
methodology of the crop (e.g., seeds,
bulbs, or tubers)? Given your response
to Unit IV.1.a., what types of production
reporting would provide the Agency
with information valuable for
compliance assurance purposes and for
managing any potential risks associated
with a violation?
c. Recordkeeping and inspection (Unit
III.3.). What establishments or other
locations are appropriate to be inspected
for records and samples, and what
records would be appropriate for
producers of PIPs to maintain?
d. Labeling (Unit III.4.). Please
comment on current labeling practices
for PIPs. Are current labeling practices
sufficient? For example, do grower
agreements offer sufficient information
and compliance assurance to ensure
registered PIPs are used in a manner
that protects human health and the
environment? Are there circumstances
where labeling different from that
currently in practice for PIPs may be
appropriate?
e. Experimental use permits (Unit
III.5.). Are there aspects of production in
association with PIP EUPs that are
different from production associated
with other types of pesticides used in
EUPs? If there are differences, how
should they be addressed for PIP EUPs?
f. Production for export (Unit III.6.).
What conditions would ensure that a
PIP is intended for export only, and
what would be necessary for such a PIP
to meet the requirements of FIFRA?
2. Are there other characteristics not
described in this document unique to
PIPs that may affect the application of
the existing regulations associated with
pesticide establishments and pesticide
production to PIP producers?
3. Are there additional sections of
FIFRA implementing regulations related
to pesticide establishment and
production regulations that should be
modified to more effectively address the
unique characteristics of PIPs?
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
V. Do Any Statutory or Executive Order
Reviews Apply to this Action?
Under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that ANPRMs are
considered ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ under section 3(f) of the
Executive Order. The Agency therefore
submitted this document to OMB for the
10–day review period afforded under
this Executive order. Any changes made
in response to OMB comments during
that review have been documented in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Apr 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
the docket as required by the Executive
order.
Since this ANPRM does not impose or
propose any requirements, and instead
seeks comments and suggestions for the
Agency to consider in possibly
developing a subsequent proposed rule,
the various other review requirements
that apply when an agency imposes
requirements do not apply to this
action.
As part of your comments on this
ANPRM, you may include any
comments or information that you have
regarding this action. In particular, any
comments or information that would
help the Agency to assess the potential
impact of a rule on small entities
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); to
consider voluntary consensus standards
pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note);
to consider environmental health or
safety effects on children pursuant to
Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); or
to consider human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations pursuant to
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). The Agency will
consider such comments during the
development of any subsequent notice
of proposed rulemaking as it takes
appropriate steps to address any
applicable requirements.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 152,
156, 167, 168, 169, 172, 174
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests, Plant-incorporated
protectants, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–6151 Filed 4–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
PO 00000
16315
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07–1350; MB Docket No. 04–319; RM–
10984]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Clinchco, VA and Coal Run, KY
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule, denial.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document denies a
petition for rule making filed by East
Kentucky Broadcasting Corp.
(‘‘Petitioner’’) proposing to substitute
Channel 221C3 for Channel 276A at
Coal Run and modify the license of
Station WPKE–FM to reflect the channel
upgrade. To accommodate the channel
upgrade, Petitioner proposes to
substitute Channel 276A for Channel
221A at Clinchco, Virginia and modify
the license of Station WDIC–FM to
reflect the channel substitution.
However, Petitioner’s proposed site is
unacceptable due to major terrain
obstruction that prevents the requisite
70 dBu signal over the entire
community of license.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418–
2177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Report
and Order, MB Docket No. 04–319,
adopted March 16, 2007, and released
March 20, 2007. The full text of this
Commission decision is available for
inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC’s Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445
Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of this decision may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 1–800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com.
This document is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act. (The
Commission, is, therefore, not required
to submit a copy of this Report and
Order to the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A)
because the proposed rule is denied.)
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7–6258 Filed 4–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 4, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16312-16315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6151]
[[Page 16312]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 152, 156, 167, 168, 169, 172, and 174
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-1003; FRL-8118-2]
RIN 2070-AJ32
Plant-Incorporated Protectants; Potential Revisions to Current
Production Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In light of the differences between plant-incorporated
protectants (PIPs) and other types of pesticides, EPA is considering
amendments to the current pesticide establishment and production
regulations promulgated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and to other related FIFRA regulations as
needed for producers of PIPs. PIPs are pesticidal substances that are
intended to be produced and used in a living plant, or the produce
thereof, and the genetic material necessary for the production of such
a pesticidal substance, and also include any inert ingredient contained
in the plant, or the produce thereof. Given these characteristics, it
is possible that PIPs may not be produced in the manner contemplated
when the current establishment and production regulations were
promulgated for other types of pesticide. In this ANPRM, the Agency
provides a list of the general regulatory provisions applicable to PIPs
that EPA is considering amending and solicits public comment on the
completeness of the list and the scope of any potential changes to
these regulations. EPA also is soliciting information that may be
useful to EPA as it reviews these regulations and developing the
proposed rules. In addition to soliciting comments through this ANPRM,
EPA intends to solicit stakeholder input through two public meetings
during the comment period of this ANPRM.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-1003, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-1003. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket
Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov web
site to view the docket index or access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available
in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Howie, Hazard Assessment
Coordination and Policy Division (7202M), Office of Science
Coordination and Policy, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-4146; fax number: (202) 564-
8502; e-mail address: howie.stephen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, process, or use PIPs. In order to identify potentially impacted
industries the analysis relies on North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes. Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing
(NAICS code 325320). This industry comprises establishments that are
producing PIPs intended for distribution and sale as pesticides.
Crop Production (NAICS code 111). These are establishments
such as farms, orchards, groves, greenhouses, and nurseries, primarily
engaged in growing crops, plants, vines, or trees and their seeds.
Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools (NAICS
code 611310). This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged
in furnishing academic courses and granting degrees at baccalaureate or
graduate levels. Furthermore, they may comprise establishments where
research on PIPs occurs and where PIPs may be grown.
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and
Life Sciences (NAICS code 54171). This industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in conducting research and
experimental development in the physical, engineering, or life
sciences, such as agriculture, environmental,
[[Page 16313]]
biology, botany, biotechnology, forests, and other allied subjects.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-1003. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
PIPs are ``pesticidal substances that are intended to be produced
and used in a living plant, or the produce thereof, and the genetic
material necessary for the production of such a pesticidal substance.
PIPs also include any inert ingredient contained in the plant, or the
produce thereof.'' (40 CFR 174.3) By definition, PIPs are primarily
distinguished from other types of pesticides because they are intended
to be produced and used in the living plant. Other types of pesticides
are primarily produced in a facility and used through physical
application, e.g., spraying or dusting of the plant. Since PIPs were
not defined when the existing regulations associated with pesticide
establishments and pesticide production were promulgated, the existing
regulations may not adequately address this distinction.
The Agency is therefore considering amending the current FIFRA
regulations associated with pesticide establishments and pesticide
production to better address PIPs and PIP production given the unique
characteristics of PIPs compared to other types of pesticides.
EPA is soliciting comments from interested stakeholders on the
issues and questions identified in this ANPRM. EPA intends to use this
information in reviewing these regulations and developing its proposed
rules.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
EPA has regulatory authority to promulgate regulations under FIFRA
sections 3(a), 8(a), 25(a), and 25(b) (7 U.S.C. 136a(a), 136f(a),
136w(a), and 136w(b)).
PIPs are pesticides under FIFRA section 2 because they are
introduced into plants with the intention of ``preventing, destroying,
repelling, or mitigating any pest...'' (7 U.S.C. 136(u)).
Under FIFRA section 7, any person who manufactures, prepares,
compounds, propagates, or processes any pesticide is a ``producer.''
``Produce,'' as further described in in 40 CFR 167.3, also means to
package, repackage, label, relabel, or otherwise change the container
of any pesticide. FIFRA section 7 requires that producers of pesticides
register the establishments where production occurs and requires that
producers report their annual production (7 U. S. C. 136e). In
addition, producers of pesticides are required under FIFRA section 8(a)
to maintain records with respect to their operations, and to make such
records available for inspection (7 U.S.C. 136f(a)). Under FIFRA
section 9 appropriately credentialed inspectors have the authority to
conduct inspections at pesticide producing establishments or other
places where pesticides are being held for distribution or sale for the
purpose of inspecting and obtaining samples (7 U.S.C. 136g).
C. Why is the Agency Considering Amending the Regulations?
EPA believes that the existing regulations need to be amended to
better address apparent differences between PIPs and other types of
pesticides in the application of FIFRA's production and production-
related requirements. The existing regulations were written for
pesticides that are generally produced and used in a more traditional
manner, e.g., spraying or dusting onto the plants. PIPs are produced
and used in a living plant, which raises questions regarding how that
``production'' should be regulated under the existing authorities of
FIFRA. In general, EPA's experience with PIPs is that they present
different and potentially lower risk situations compared to chemical
pesticides. However, EPA needs to ensure that appropriate PIP
production data are available to manage any potential risk a PIP might
pose.
The United States Government published in the Federal Register
issue of June 26, 1986 (51 FR 23302) a document entitled, Coordinated
Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology (``Coordinated Framework''),
which describes in broad terms the Federal Government's approach to
regulating biotechnology products. In that document, the Federal
Government concluded that it could appropriately regulate the products
of biotechnology under existing laws, but recognized that, in some
cases, new regulations might be needed. Consistent with the Coordinated
Framework, EPA regulates PIPs under its pesticide authorities. In the
Federal Register issue of July 19, 2001 (66 FR 37771) (FRL-6057-7), EPA
published a rule that established a regulatory framework for PIPs. That
rule clarified the relationship between plants and PIPs under FIFRA,
exempted from FIFRA requirements PIPs derived entirely through
conventional breeding between sexually compatible plants, established a
new part in the Code of Federal Regulations specifically for PIPs (40
CFR part 174), provided requirements for reporting of adverse effects,
and set forth certain procedures for CBI. In that Federal Register
document, EPA also anticipated the future need for proposing
regulations tailored
[[Page 16314]]
specifically to PIPs so that the regulatory framework would better fit
their unique characteristics (66 FR 37807). EPA indicated that it would
continue to apply existing regulations to PIPs, except where superseded
by the regulations in the July 19, 2001 Final Rule, until the Agency
could develop additional regulations specifically tailored to PIPs.
Since the mid-1990s, EPA has approved a number of PIP experimental
use permits (EUPs) under FIFRA section 5, as well as seed increase and
commercial use registrations under FIFRA section 3. During this time,
EPA has registered facilities involved in the production of PIPs as
pesticide producing establishments under FIFRA section 7. These have
included, for example, sites of the original transformation (where
plant tissue was transformed by the insertion of PIP genetic material)
and seed processing facilities.
FIFRA section 7 requires that producers of pesticides register the
establishments where the pesticide is produced and report the amount of
pesticide produced. EPA's experience to date has demonstrated,
particularly in the area of pesticide production, that the existing
regulations (e.g., 40 CFR part 167) may need to be better tailored to
address PIPs. For example, existing regulations require pesticide
production quantities to be reported in terms of volume or weight
(gallons or pounds), measurements that are not useful when considering
a pesticidal substance produced within a plant. Other questions concern
the manner in which PIPs are increased within a living plant. Such
increase occurs at many stages from product development through use,
which raises questions concerning where pesticide production occurs,
and what establishments must register and report their production.
Clarification of this matter would help to ensure that appropriate
persons comply with production related requirements, and that other
persons do not face unnecessary regulatory burden. To that end, EPA is
reviewing the existing regulations in 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter E
and considering potential regulatory changes to address the apparent
differences between PIPs and other types of pesticides.
III. Current Regulations Under Review
EPA is considering amending the following existing regulations
related to pesticide establishment and production to better address
PIPs and PIP production:
1. Registration of establishments where PIPs are produced (FIFRA
section 7 and 40 CFR 167.20). Current regulations require any producer
of a pesticide to register the ``production'' site with EPA. The
statutory and regulatory definitions of ``produce'' include several
activities, including manufacturing, preparing, compounding,
propagating, or processing any pesticide or packaging, repackaging,
labeling, and relabeling the container of any pesticide.
2. Reporting by registered production establishments (FIFRA section
7 and 40 CFR 167.85). Current regulations require a producer operating
a producing establishment to report annually the types and amount of
each pesticidal product that was produced, sold, or distributed the
previous year and to estimate the amount that will be produced during
the current year.
3. Recordkeeping and inspection authority (FIFRA sections 8 and 9
and 40 CFR 169.2 and 169.3). EPA's statutory authority under FIFRA
section 8, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, require
pesticide producers, registrants, and applicants for registration to
maintain certain records related to pesticide production (i.e.,
including information regarding the production, receipt, and shipment
of pesticides) and to provide these records upon request to
appropriately credentialed inspectors. FIFRA section 8 also provides
authority for appropriately credentialed inspectors to conduct
inspections to access such information. Furthermore, under FIFRA
section 9 appropriately credentialed inspectors have the authority to
conduct inspections at pesticide producing establishments or other
places where pesticides are being held for distribution or sale for the
purpose of inspecting and obtaining samples.
4. Labeling on PIP containers (FIFRA section 2 and 40 CFR 156.10).
The statute and current regulations provide requirements for labeling
of pesticides, including name of the product, identity of the producer,
net content, product registration number, establishment registration
number, ingredient statement, hazard and precautionary statements,
directions for use, and use classification. Currently, PIPs are labeled
for FIFRA section 5 EUPs and FIFRA section 3 seed increase
registrations only.
5. EUPs for field testing of unregistered PIPs (FIFRA section 5 and
40 CFR part 172). FIFRA allows for field testing of unregistered
pesticides under an EUP. Any pesticide production activity related to
an EUP, either the production of a pesticide for use in an EUP or by
being produced as a result of an EUP, is subject to FIFRA production
establishment and recordkeeping requirements.
6. Production of unregistered PIPs for export (FIFRA section 17 and
40 CFR 168.65-168.85). FIFRA exempts pesticides intended solely for
export from certain FIFRA requirements, including product registration
requirements. Products intended for export only are therefore not
subject to the product safety evaluation required of products intended
for domestic distribution and sale. However, they must still comply
with the producer establishment registration, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of FIFRA sections 7 and 8 and are subject to
certain labeling requirements, e.g., their label must include the
statement: ``Not Registered for Use in the United States of America.''
IV. Request for Comments
EPA is seeking public comment on the completeness of the list of
current regulations that need to be reviewed for applicability to PIPs
and PIP producers (see Unit III.), and is soliciting related
information to use in reviewing these regulations and developing its
proposed rules. These issues are especially challenging for PIPs, since
based on statutory and regulatory definitions, the borders between
production and use are unclear. EPA is seeking public input to help
inform decisions on how best to ensure appropriate compliance without
imposing unnecessarily burdensome reporting or labeling requirements on
PIP registrants, producers, distributors, and users.
1. EPA would like comments in response to the following questions
with respect to the regulations referenced in Unit III.:
a. Registration of establishments (Unit III.1.). Given that PIPs by
definition are intended to be produced and used in a living plant, what
activities should the Agency consider to be part of ``production'' as
that term is defined in FIFRA (which includes manufacturing, preparing,
compounding, propagating, or processing any pesticide or packaging,
repackaging, labeling, and relabeling the container), and what
establishments should be registered to help EPA manage any potential
risks associated with PIPs? What other types of facilities, if any
(e.g., growers involved in seed production), involved in the
development of PIP-containing varieties should be subject to these
requirements? Please explain the reason for your response.
b. Production reporting (Unit III.2.). What production reporting,
by whom and in what units (e.g., volume, weight, number of seeds, etc.)
would be
[[Page 16315]]
appropriate? Should reporting units be dependent on the reproductive
methodology of the crop (e.g., seeds, bulbs, or tubers)? Given your
response to Unit IV.1.a., what types of production reporting would
provide the Agency with information valuable for compliance assurance
purposes and for managing any potential risks associated with a
violation?
c. Recordkeeping and inspection (Unit III.3.). What establishments
or other locations are appropriate to be inspected for records and
samples, and what records would be appropriate for producers of PIPs to
maintain?
d. Labeling (Unit III.4.). Please comment on current labeling
practices for PIPs. Are current labeling practices sufficient? For
example, do grower agreements offer sufficient information and
compliance assurance to ensure registered PIPs are used in a manner
that protects human health and the environment? Are there circumstances
where labeling different from that currently in practice for PIPs may
be appropriate?
e. Experimental use permits (Unit III.5.). Are there aspects of
production in association with PIP EUPs that are different from
production associated with other types of pesticides used in EUPs? If
there are differences, how should they be addressed for PIP EUPs?
f. Production for export (Unit III.6.). What conditions would
ensure that a PIP is intended for export only, and what would be
necessary for such a PIP to meet the requirements of FIFRA?
2. Are there other characteristics not described in this document
unique to PIPs that may affect the application of the existing
regulations associated with pesticide establishments and pesticide
production to PIP producers?
3. Are there additional sections of FIFRA implementing regulations
related to pesticide establishment and production regulations that
should be modified to more effectively address the unique
characteristics of PIPs?
V. Do Any Statutory or Executive Order Reviews Apply to this Action?
Under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has determined that ANPRMs are considered ``significant
regulatory actions'' under section 3(f) of the Executive Order. The
Agency therefore submitted this document to OMB for the 10-day review
period afforded under this Executive order. Any changes made in
response to OMB comments during that review have been documented in the
docket as required by the Executive order.
Since this ANPRM does not impose or propose any requirements, and
instead seeks comments and suggestions for the Agency to consider in
possibly developing a subsequent proposed rule, the various other
review requirements that apply when an agency imposes requirements do
not apply to this action.
As part of your comments on this ANPRM, you may include any
comments or information that you have regarding this action. In
particular, any comments or information that would help the Agency to
assess the potential impact of a rule on small entities pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); to consider
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law
104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note); to consider environmental
health or safety effects on children pursuant to Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); or to consider human health
or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations pursuant
to Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The Agency will consider
such comments during the development of any subsequent notice of
proposed rulemaking as it takes appropriate steps to address any
applicable requirements.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 152, 156, 167, 168, 169, 172, 174
Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Plant-incorporated
protectants, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-6151 Filed 4-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S