Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reopening of Public Comment Periods for the Proposed Designations of Critical Habitat for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher and the San Diego Fairy Shrimp, 15857-15859 [E7-5743]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 3, 2007 / Proposed Rules
and format of item data reported to the
SC for sale must be in conformance with
standards developed by the FAS ESC.
(c) Provide all post-sale data and
metrics to the FAS Planning Office in
care of GSA MT using format and
process developed by the FAS ESC no
later than [date six months after
publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register].
[FR Doc. E7–6068 Filed 4–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AI71 and RIN 1018–AI72
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Reopening of Public
Comment Periods for the Proposed
Designations of Critical Habitat for the
Coastal California Gnatcatcher and the
San Diego Fairy Shrimp
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rules; reopening of
public comment periods.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) announce the
reopening of the public comment period
on our April 24, 2003, proposed rule (68
FR 20228) to designate critical habitat
for the coastal California gnatcatcher
(Polioptila californica californica) and
our April 22, 2003, proposed rule (68 FR
19888) to designate critical habitat for
the San Diego fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta sandiegonensis). The
comment period will provide the public
and Federal, State, and local agencies
and Tribes with an opportunity to
submit in writing updated comments
and information on these species and
associated habitat, the proposed critical
habitat designations, and respective
draft economic analyses. Comments
relevant to issues identified for
consideration in the April 22 and April
24, 2003, proposed critical habitat rules
and the April 8, 2004, notice of
availability of the draft economic
analyses for these species that were
previously submitted during one of the
prior public comment periods need not
be resubmitted as they have already
been incorporated into the public record
and will be fully considered in any final
decision. Comments relevant to issues
identified in the April 8, 2004, Federal
Register notice (69 FR 18515) reopening
the comment period on the proposed
determination of a Distinct Vertebrate
Population Segment for the California
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
gnatcatcher also need not be
resubmitted as that determination will
be made separately from the critical
habitat designations for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and San Diego
fairy shrimp.
DATES: We will accept comments and
information until May 3, 2007. Any
comments received after the closing
date may not be considered in the final
decisions on these proposals.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment,
you may submit your comments and
materials on these proposals to us by
any one of the following methods:
1. You may submit written comments
and information to Jim Bartel, Field
Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, 6010 Hidden Valley Road,
Carlsbad, CA 92011.
2. You may hand-deliver written
comments and information to the
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at the
above address.
3. You may send comments by
facsimile to 760–431–5901.
4. You may send comments by
electronic mail (e-mail) to
FW8cfwocomments@fws.gov. Please
include ‘‘Attn: RIN 1018–AI71 and RIN
1018–AI72’’ in the subject line of your
e-mail and your name and address in
the body of your message. If you do not
receive a confirmation from the system
that we have received your message,
contact us directly by telephone at 760–
431–9440.
5. You may go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments and materials received, as
well as supporting documentation used
in the preparation of these proposed
rules, will be available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the Carlsbad
Fish and Wildlife Office at the above
address (telephone 760–431–9440).
Copies of the proposed rule and draft
economic analysis for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and San Diego
fairy shrimp are available on the
Internet at https://www.fws.gov/Carlsbad.
You may also request copies of these
documents by contacting the Carlsbad
Fish and Wildlife Office at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tannika Engelhard, Branch Chief,
Listing, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office (telephone 760–431–9440).
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the hearing impaired (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15857
Public Comments Solicited
We are soliciting comments from the
public, governmental agencies, Tribes,
the scientific community, industry, or
any other interested parties concerning
events that have occurred since the
April 2003 publications of the proposed
designations of critical habitat for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San
Diego fairy shrimp and the April 2004
publications of the draft economic
analyses of the proposed designations
for both species and any new
information relevant to the status of the
species and their essential habitats.
With regard to the proposed rule and
draft economic analysis for the coastal
California gnatcatcher, we particularly
seek comments concerning:
(1) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject areas
and their possible impacts on areas
proposed as critical habitat for the
coastal California gnatcatcher, including
new information regarding areas
proposed as critical habitat that may
have lost coastal sage scrub as a result
of development or other land use;
(2) Approval and issuance of an
incidental take permit under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act), for the
Orange County Southern Subregion
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP);
(3) Progress in the development and/
or implementation of other regional
HCPs, including the Natural Community
Conservation Plan/HCP for the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes in Los Angeles
County, CA, and the Western Riverside
County Multiple Species HCP;
(4) Effects of the large wildfires that
occurred in October 2003 and more
recently on the coastal sage scrub
habitat in Ventura, Los Angeles,
Riverside, San Bernardino, and San
Diego counties; and
(5) Publication of new biological
information regarding the effects of
wildfires from 2003 to the present or
other relevant biological publications
addressing the status and recovery of
sage scrub habitat and conservation of
the coastal California gnatcatcher.
With regard to the proposed
designation of critical habitat for the
San Diego fairy shrimp, we particularly
seek comments concerning:
(1) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject areas
and their possible impacts on areas
proposed as critical habitat for the San
Diego fairy shrimp, including new
information regarding areas proposed as
critical habitat that may have lost vernal
pool habitat as a result of development;
(2) Information regarding newly
identified vernal pools that were not
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
15858
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 3, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
previously known to support the San
Diego fairy shrimp and whether these
areas are essential to the conservation of
the species, and why; and
(3) The October 13, 2006, ruling by
the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of California that enjoined the
incidental take permit for seven vernal
pool species (including the San Diego
fairy shrimp) issued to the City of San
Diego under the City’s Subarea Plan for
the Southwestern San Diego County
Multiple Species Conservation Program
(MSCP), and how areas within the
boundaries of the City of San Diego’s
Subarea Plan of the MSCP that have
been proposed for exclusion from
critical habitat for the San Diego fairy
shrimp should be evaluated in light of
the Court’s decision.
With regard to the proposed
designation of critical habitat for both
the coastal California gnatcatcher and
the San Diego fairy shrimp, we
particularly seek comments concerning
any new information regarding costs
associated with the proposed
designations of critical habitat for these
species, and whether the 2004 draft
economic analyses made appropriate
assumptions regarding likely regulatory
changes, indirect effects (e.g., property
tax losses due to reduced home
construction), opportunity costs, and
regional costs associated with land use
controls that could arise from the
designation of critical habitat for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San
Diego fairy shrimp.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Background
On October 24, 2000, we published a
final rule designating approximately
513,650 ac (207,890 ha) of land in
portions of Los Angeles, Orange,
Riverside, San Bernardino, and San
Diego counties as critical habitat for the
coastal California gnatcatcher (65 FR
63680). A final rule designating
approximately 4,025 ac (1,629 ha) of
land in Orange and San Diego counties
as critical habitat for the San Diego fairy
shrimp was published in the Federal
Register on October 23, 2000 (65 FR
63438). Following the publication of
these final rules, several lawsuits were
filed against the Service by multiple
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
parties, including the Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC), Building
Industry Association of Southern
California, National Association of
Home Builders, Foothill/Eastern
Transportation Corridor, and Rancho
Mission Viejo, L.L.C. (NRDC v. U.S.
Dept. of Interior, CV–99–2496 (C.D.Cal.,
filed 12/20/00); Building Industry
Association of Southern California et al.
v. Norton, CV 01–7028 (D.C.C., filed
1/17/01), and Rancho Mission Viejo
L.L.C. v. Babbitt, CV 01–8412 (D.D.C.,
filed 12/28/00)), challenging the critical
habitat designations for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and/or San Diego
fairy shrimp. On June 11, 2002, the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of
California granted our request for a
remand of the coastal California
gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp
critical habitat designations so that we
could reconsider their associated
economic analyses. For more
information about the litigation history
associated with these critical habitat
designations, please see the Previous
Federal Action sections of the April 24,
2003, proposed rule for the coastal
California gnatcatcher (68 FR 20228)
and the April 22, 2003 proposed rule for
the San Diego fairy shrimp (68 FR
19890).
On April 24, 2003, we published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(68 FR 20228) to designate critical
habitat for the coastal California
gnatcatcher on approximately 495,795
acres (ac) (200,595 hectares (ha)) of land
in Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange,
Riverside, San Bernardino, and San
Diego counties.
The Service published a proposed
rule in the April 22, 2003, edition of the
Federal Register (68 FR 19888) to
designate critical habitat for the San
Diego fairy shrimp on approximately
6,098 ac (2,468 ha) of land in Orange
and San Diego counties.
We accepted public comments on
these two proposed rules until June 23,
2003. On April 8, 2004, we published a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing the availability of draft
economic analyses for the proposed
designations, reopening the public
comment periods on our proposed rules,
and announcing the scheduling of
public hearings on our proposed critical
habitat designations and draft economic
analyses for the coastal California
gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp.
Public hearings were conducted on
April 29, 2004, from 1 to 3 p.m. and
from 6 to 8 p.m. in Carlsbad, California.
The second public comment period
closed on May 10, 2004. The public
comment period for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and San Diego
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fairy shrimp proposed critical habitat
rules is again reopened, and we will
accept comments and information until
May 3, 2007. Any comments received
after the closing date may not be
considered in the final decisions on
these proposals.
The Service initiated work on the
final critical habitat rules for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and the San
Diego fairy shrimp, but due to other
priorities we did not finalize the
designations. On February 8, 2007, a
motion was filed by the Plaintiffs
requesting the Court to direct us to
finalize critical habitat designations for
the coastal California gnatcatcher and
San Diego fairy shrimp. We reached an
agreement with the Plaintiffs whereby
final designations would be completed
on or before November 2, 2007. This
settlement agreement has been
submitted to the Court for approval.
Areas currently designated as critical
habitat for the coastal California
gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp
will remain in place until such time as
new final regulations for these species
become effective.
Critical habitat receives protection
from destruction or adverse
modification through required
consultation under section 7 of the Act,
with regard to actions carried out,
funded, or authorized by a Federal
agency. Section 4(b)(2) of the Act
requires that we designate or revise
critical habitat on the basis of the best
scientific and commercial data
available, after taking into consideration
economic, national security, and any
other relevant impacts of specifying any
particular area as critical habitat. The
draft economic analysis for the
proposed rule to designate critical
habitat for the coastal California
gnatcatcher estimated that the proposed
designation may result in a potential
economic cost, resulting from section 7
of the Act, of approximately $915
million through the year 2025, with an
estimated annualized cost of $114
million. In the development of a final
rule, we will evaluate these potential
economic impacts and may exclude
specific areas from the final designation
on the basis of economics, conservation
programs and partnerships, or other
factors pursuant to section 4(b)(2) of the
Act. Any such exclusion would result in
a reduction of the potential economic
impacts of this designation.
Section 318 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for FY04 (Pub. L.
108–136), amended the Act by adding a
new section 4(a)(3)(B) that prohibits the
Service from designating as critical
habitat any lands or other geographical
areas owned or controlled by the
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 3, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Department of Defense, or designated
for its use, that are subject to an
Integrated Natural Resources
Management Plan prepared under
section 101 of the Sikes Act
Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 670a), if the
Secretary determines in writing that
such plan provides a benefit to the
species for which critical habitat is
being proposed for designation. In the
development of the final designation of
critical habitat each species, the areas
proposed will be reviewed to determine
if the application of section 4(a)(3)(B) of
the Act may be appropriate.
We also prepared a draft economic
analysis of the April 22, 2003, proposed
rule to designate critical habitat for the
San Diego fairy shrimp. The draft
analysis of this proposed designation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
estimates that potential economic costs
associated with section 7 of the Act
range up to $54.6 million over the next
20 years, with a potential annualized
impact of $7.2 million.
We are reopening the comment period
to allow all interested parties to
comment simultaneously on the
proposed rules for the coastal California
gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp
and the draft economic analyses and to
provide new information regarding the
species and their essential habitats and
events that have occurred since the
publication of the proposed rules in
April 2003 and release of the draft
economic analyses in April 2004.
References Cited
A complete list of all references used
in the development of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15859
critical habitat designations for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San
Diego fairy shrimp is available upon
request from the Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Author
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff of the Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 22, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–5743 Filed 4–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15857-15859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5743]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018-AI71 and RIN 1018-AI72
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reopening of
Public Comment Periods for the Proposed Designations of Critical
Habitat for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher and the San Diego Fairy
Shrimp
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rules; reopening of public comment periods.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announce the
reopening of the public comment period on our April 24, 2003, proposed
rule (68 FR 20228) to designate critical habitat for the coastal
California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) and our
April 22, 2003, proposed rule (68 FR 19888) to designate critical
habitat for the San Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegonensis).
The comment period will provide the public and Federal, State, and
local agencies and Tribes with an opportunity to submit in writing
updated comments and information on these species and associated
habitat, the proposed critical habitat designations, and respective
draft economic analyses. Comments relevant to issues identified for
consideration in the April 22 and April 24, 2003, proposed critical
habitat rules and the April 8, 2004, notice of availability of the
draft economic analyses for these species that were previously
submitted during one of the prior public comment periods need not be
resubmitted as they have already been incorporated into the public
record and will be fully considered in any final decision. Comments
relevant to issues identified in the April 8, 2004, Federal Register
notice (69 FR 18515) reopening the comment period on the proposed
determination of a Distinct Vertebrate Population Segment for the
California gnatcatcher also need not be resubmitted as that
determination will be made separately from the critical habitat
designations for the coastal California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy
shrimp.
DATES: We will accept comments and information until May 3, 2007. Any
comments received after the closing date may not be considered in the
final decisions on these proposals.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, you may submit your comments and
materials on these proposals to us by any one of the following methods:
1. You may submit written comments and information to Jim Bartel,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, 6010 Hidden Valley
Road, Carlsbad, CA 92011.
2. You may hand-deliver written comments and information to the
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at the above address.
3. You may send comments by facsimile to 760-431-5901.
4. You may send comments by electronic mail (e-mail) to
FW8cfwocomments@fws.gov. Please include ``Attn: RIN 1018-AI71 and RIN
1018-AI72'' in the subject line of your e-mail and your name and
address in the body of your message. If you do not receive a
confirmation from the system that we have received your message,
contact us directly by telephone at 760-431-9440.
5. You may go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Comments and materials received, as well as supporting
documentation used in the preparation of these proposed rules, will be
available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business
hours at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office at the above address
(telephone 760-431-9440).
Copies of the proposed rule and draft economic analysis for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp are available
on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/Carlsbad. You may also request
copies of these documents by contacting the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tannika Engelhard, Branch Chief,
Listing, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (telephone 760-431-9440).
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the hearing impaired
(TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-
877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments Solicited
We are soliciting comments from the public, governmental agencies,
Tribes, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested
parties concerning events that have occurred since the April 2003
publications of the proposed designations of critical habitat for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp and the April
2004 publications of the draft economic analyses of the proposed
designations for both species and any new information relevant to the
status of the species and their essential habitats.
With regard to the proposed rule and draft economic analysis for
the coastal California gnatcatcher, we particularly seek comments
concerning:
(1) Land use designations and current or planned activities in the
subject areas and their possible impacts on areas proposed as critical
habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher, including new
information regarding areas proposed as critical habitat that may have
lost coastal sage scrub as a result of development or other land use;
(2) Approval and issuance of an incidental take permit under
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(Act), for the Orange County Southern Subregion Habitat Conservation
Plan (HCP);
(3) Progress in the development and/or implementation of other
regional HCPs, including the Natural Community Conservation Plan/HCP
for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes in Los Angeles County, CA, and the
Western Riverside County Multiple Species HCP;
(4) Effects of the large wildfires that occurred in October 2003
and more recently on the coastal sage scrub habitat in Ventura, Los
Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties; and
(5) Publication of new biological information regarding the effects
of wildfires from 2003 to the present or other relevant biological
publications addressing the status and recovery of sage scrub habitat
and conservation of the coastal California gnatcatcher.
With regard to the proposed designation of critical habitat for the
San Diego fairy shrimp, we particularly seek comments concerning:
(1) Land use designations and current or planned activities in the
subject areas and their possible impacts on areas proposed as critical
habitat for the San Diego fairy shrimp, including new information
regarding areas proposed as critical habitat that may have lost vernal
pool habitat as a result of development;
(2) Information regarding newly identified vernal pools that were
not
[[Page 15858]]
previously known to support the San Diego fairy shrimp and whether
these areas are essential to the conservation of the species, and why;
and
(3) The October 13, 2006, ruling by the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of California that enjoined the incidental take
permit for seven vernal pool species (including the San Diego fairy
shrimp) issued to the City of San Diego under the City's Subarea Plan
for the Southwestern San Diego County Multiple Species Conservation
Program (MSCP), and how areas within the boundaries of the City of San
Diego's Subarea Plan of the MSCP that have been proposed for exclusion
from critical habitat for the San Diego fairy shrimp should be
evaluated in light of the Court's decision.
With regard to the proposed designation of critical habitat for
both the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Diego fairy shrimp,
we particularly seek comments concerning any new information regarding
costs associated with the proposed designations of critical habitat for
these species, and whether the 2004 draft economic analyses made
appropriate assumptions regarding likely regulatory changes, indirect
effects (e.g., property tax losses due to reduced home construction),
opportunity costs, and regional costs associated with land use controls
that could arise from the designation of critical habitat for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Background
On October 24, 2000, we published a final rule designating
approximately 513,650 ac (207,890 ha) of land in portions of Los
Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties as
critical habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher (65 FR 63680).
A final rule designating approximately 4,025 ac (1,629 ha) of land in
Orange and San Diego counties as critical habitat for the San Diego
fairy shrimp was published in the Federal Register on October 23, 2000
(65 FR 63438). Following the publication of these final rules, several
lawsuits were filed against the Service by multiple parties, including
the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Building Industry
Association of Southern California, National Association of Home
Builders, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, and Rancho Mission
Viejo, L.L.C. (NRDC v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, CV-99-2496 (C.D.Cal.,
filed 12/20/00); Building Industry Association of Southern California
et al. v. Norton, CV 01-7028 (D.C.C., filed 1/17/01), and Rancho
Mission Viejo L.L.C. v. Babbitt, CV 01-8412 (D.D.C., filed 12/28/00)),
challenging the critical habitat designations for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and/or San Diego fairy shrimp. On June 11, 2002,
the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted
our request for a remand of the coastal California gnatcatcher and San
Diego fairy shrimp critical habitat designations so that we could
reconsider their associated economic analyses. For more information
about the litigation history associated with these critical habitat
designations, please see the Previous Federal Action sections of the
April 24, 2003, proposed rule for the coastal California gnatcatcher
(68 FR 20228) and the April 22, 2003 proposed rule for the San Diego
fairy shrimp (68 FR 19890).
On April 24, 2003, we published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register (68 FR 20228) to designate critical habitat for the coastal
California gnatcatcher on approximately 495,795 acres (ac) (200,595
hectares (ha)) of land in Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, and San Diego counties.
The Service published a proposed rule in the April 22, 2003,
edition of the Federal Register (68 FR 19888) to designate critical
habitat for the San Diego fairy shrimp on approximately 6,098 ac (2,468
ha) of land in Orange and San Diego counties.
We accepted public comments on these two proposed rules until June
23, 2003. On April 8, 2004, we published a notice in the Federal
Register announcing the availability of draft economic analyses for the
proposed designations, reopening the public comment periods on our
proposed rules, and announcing the scheduling of public hearings on our
proposed critical habitat designations and draft economic analyses for
the coastal California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp. Public
hearings were conducted on April 29, 2004, from 1 to 3 p.m. and from 6
to 8 p.m. in Carlsbad, California. The second public comment period
closed on May 10, 2004. The public comment period for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp proposed critical
habitat rules is again reopened, and we will accept comments and
information until May 3, 2007. Any comments received after the closing
date may not be considered in the final decisions on these proposals.
The Service initiated work on the final critical habitat rules for
the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Diego fairy shrimp, but
due to other priorities we did not finalize the designations. On
February 8, 2007, a motion was filed by the Plaintiffs requesting the
Court to direct us to finalize critical habitat designations for the
coastal California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp. We reached
an agreement with the Plaintiffs whereby final designations would be
completed on or before November 2, 2007. This settlement agreement has
been submitted to the Court for approval.
Areas currently designated as critical habitat for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp will remain in place
until such time as new final regulations for these species become
effective.
Critical habitat receives protection from destruction or adverse
modification through required consultation under section 7 of the Act,
with regard to actions carried out, funded, or authorized by a Federal
agency. Section 4(b)(2) of the Act requires that we designate or revise
critical habitat on the basis of the best scientific and commercial
data available, after taking into consideration economic, national
security, and any other relevant impacts of specifying any particular
area as critical habitat. The draft economic analysis for the proposed
rule to designate critical habitat for the coastal California
gnatcatcher estimated that the proposed designation may result in a
potential economic cost, resulting from section 7 of the Act, of
approximately $915 million through the year 2025, with an estimated
annualized cost of $114 million. In the development of a final rule, we
will evaluate these potential economic impacts and may exclude specific
areas from the final designation on the basis of economics,
conservation programs and partnerships, or other factors pursuant to
section 4(b)(2) of the Act. Any such exclusion would result in a
reduction of the potential economic impacts of this designation.
Section 318 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY04
(Pub. L. 108-136), amended the Act by adding a new section 4(a)(3)(B)
that prohibits the Service from designating as critical habitat any
lands or other geographical areas owned or controlled by the
[[Page 15859]]
Department of Defense, or designated for its use, that are subject to
an Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan prepared under section
101 of the Sikes Act Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 670a), if the Secretary
determines in writing that such plan provides a benefit to the species
for which critical habitat is being proposed for designation. In the
development of the final designation of critical habitat each species,
the areas proposed will be reviewed to determine if the application of
section 4(a)(3)(B) of the Act may be appropriate.
We also prepared a draft economic analysis of the April 22, 2003,
proposed rule to designate critical habitat for the San Diego fairy
shrimp. The draft analysis of this proposed designation estimates that
potential economic costs associated with section 7 of the Act range up
to $54.6 million over the next 20 years, with a potential annualized
impact of $7.2 million.
We are reopening the comment period to allow all interested parties
to comment simultaneously on the proposed rules for the coastal
California gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp and the draft
economic analyses and to provide new information regarding the species
and their essential habitats and events that have occurred since the
publication of the proposed rules in April 2003 and release of the
draft economic analyses in April 2004.
References Cited
A complete list of all references used in the development of the
proposed critical habitat designations for the coastal California
gnatcatcher and San Diego fairy shrimp is available upon request from
the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Author
The primary authors of this notice are the staff of the Carlsbad
Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 22, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-5743 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P