Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, 15614-15617 [E7-6054]
Download as PDF
15614
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 62 / Monday, April 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
commodity data on a sub-trade basis
pursuant to § 535.703(d) of this chapter.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–6060 Filed 3–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Parts 23 and 26
[Docket OST–97–2550]
RIN 2105–AD51
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Program
Office of the Secretary, DOT.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
SUMMARY: This document adjusts the
dollar limits and size limits used to
define small businesses for the
Department of Transportation’s Airport
Concessions Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (ACDBE) program. The
Department of Transportation amends
these size limits in order to ensure that
the opportunity of small businesses to
participate in the ACDBE program
remains unchanged after taking inflation
into account. This document, as
required by statute, also adjusts the
dollar limits used to define small
businesses for the Department of
Transportation’s Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise (DBE) program,
which applies to State and local
highway, transit, and airport recipients
of DOT financial assistance. This
document also corrects a reference error
in a previous final rule. Finally, this
document makes minor changes to the
language of a previous rule in order to
accurately explain the role of
administrative guidance material.
DATES: This rule is effective May 2,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert C. Ashby, Deputy Assistant
General Counsel for Regulation and
Enforcement, Department of
Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW.,
Room 10424, Washington, DC 20590,
phone numbers (202) 366–9310 (voice),
(202) 3669313 (fax), (202) 755–7687
(TTY), bob.ashby@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 22, 2005, the Department
published a final rule revising 49 CFR
Part 23—the regulation governing the
airport concessions disadvantaged
business enterprise (ACDBE) program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Mar 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
On the same day, the Department
published a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) on the
business size standards for eligibility in
the ACDBE program as well as on two
other matters concerning
implementation of the program. This
final rule addresses the issues raised in
the SNPRM and the comments made in
response to the SNPRM.
The DBE Airport Concessions and
Contracting Programs
The DOT-assisted contracts DBE rule
and airport concessions DBE rule are
based on different statutes. Each statute
applies to a distinct type of business
that may seek DOT financial assistance.
The ACDBE program is designed to give
business opportunities to certain small
business concerns that operate at
airports and that are owned and
controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals. The ACDBE
program is mandated by 49 U.S.C.
47107(e), originally enacted in 1987 and
amended in 1992.
The DBE program for DOT-assisted
contracts is a statutory program
intended to ensure nondiscriminatory
contracting opportunities for small
business concerns owned and
controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals in the
Department’s highway, mass transit and
airport financial assistance programs.
The statutory provision governing the
DBE program in the highway and mass
transit financial assistance programs is
1101(b) of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU),
Public Law 109–59, August 10, 2005.
The statutory provision governing the
DBE program as it relates to the airport
planning and airport development
financial assistance programs is 49
U.S.C. 47113.
ACDBE Gross Receipts Size Standards
The ACDBE program is designed to
help small business concerns, owned
and controlled by socially and
economically disadvantaged
individuals, become self-sufficient and
able to compete with non-disadvantaged
firms. Under the current DOT rule, if the
airport concessions firm’s annual gross
receipts averaged over the preceding
three fiscal years exceed $30 million,
then it is not considered a small
business eligible to be certified as an
ACDBE. The Department notes that the
existing size standards have not been
adjusted for inflation since June 1, 1992.
This final rule adjusts the size standards
for eligibility as an ACDBE.
A number of comments submitted to
the Department supported adjusting the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
gross receipts size limit for inflation.
One comment suggested that the
Department consider distinct size
standards for each type of concession. A
number of comments also suggested that
an employee based size standard is
inappropriate because businesses may
operate using different business model
configurations with different numbers of
employees. These comments also point
out that verifying the number of
employees is more complex than
verifying gross receipts, which are
recorded in tax returns.
This final rule adjusts the general
ACDBE gross receipts cap for inflation.
This rule only applies an employee
based size standard if the business
operates pay telephones or if the
business is an automobile dealer. The
Department views a general gross
receipts size limit that is adjusted for
inflation as the most efficient and fair
way to establish size limits for the
ACDBE program. The adjustment
compensates for the rise in the general
level of prices over time from the
second quarter of 1992 to the third
quarter of 2006. In order to ensure that
this adjustment is made on a more
timely basis in the future, the rule
provides for a similar adjustment every
two years, using the same methods. At
two year intervals, the Department will
publish a final rule to update the size
standard numbers.
It should be emphasized that this
action does not increase the size
standard for ACDBEs in real dollar
terms. It simply maintains the status
quo, adjusting to 2006 dollars. A
number of comments opposed the idea
of making Part 23 and Part 26 size
standards identical because the
capitalization requirements for airport
concessions are much higher. The
Department agrees and will not
harmonize the standards.
In order to make an inflation
adjustment to the gross receipts figures,
the Department of Transportation uses a
Department of Commerce price index.
The Department of Commerce’s Bureau
of Economic Analysis prepares constant
dollar estimates of state and local
government purchases of goods and
services by deflating current dollar
estimates by suitable price indexes.
These indices include purchases of
durable and non-durable goods, and
other services. Using these price
deflators enables the Department to
adjust dollar figures for past years’
inflation. Given the nature of the
Department’s DBE Program and ACDBE
Program, adjusting the gross receipts
cap in the same manner in which
inflation adjustments are made to the
costs of state and local government
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 62 / Monday, April 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
purchases of goods and services is
simple, accurate, and fair.
The inflation rate on purchases by
State and local governments for the
current year is calculated by dividing
the price deflator for the third quarter of
2006 (128.352) by 1992’s second quarter
price deflator (80.583). The result of the
calculation is 1.5928, which represents
an inflation rate of 59.28% from the
second quarter of 1992. Multiplying the
$30,000,000 figure for small business
enterprises by 1.5928 equals
$47,784,000, which will be rounded off
to the nearest $10,000, or $47,780,000.
Therefore, under the new rule, if a
firm’s gross receipts, averaged over the
firm’s previous three fiscal years,
exceeds $47,780,000, then it exceeds the
airport concessions small business size
limit contained in Part 23.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
ACDBE Car Rental Company Size
Standards
Under the existing rule, car rental
companies are not eligible to participate
in the ACDBE program if their average
gross receipts over the three previous
fiscal years exceed $40 million. This
final rule adjusts the size standard for
car rental companies to reflect the
effects of inflation on the real dollar
value.
The inflation rate on purchases by
State and local governments for the
current year is calculated by dividing
the price deflator for the third quarter of
2006 (128.352) by 1992’s second quarter
price deflator (80.583). The result of the
calculation is 1.5928, which represents
an inflation rate of 59.28% from the
second quarter of 1992. Multiplying the
$40,000,000 figure for car rental
companies by 1.5928 equals
$63,712,000, which will be rounded off
to the nearest $10,000, or $63,710,000.
Therefore, under the new rule, if a car
rental company’s gross receipts,
averaged over the company’s previous
three fiscal years, exceeds $63,710,000,
then it exceeds the airport concessions
car rental company size limit contained
in Part 23.
A number of comments also
supported establishing car rental goals
on a nationwide basis for car rental
agencies with a nationwide presence.
The Department recognizes that a
number of issues need to be considered
before such a rule can be published. The
Department will continue to consider
developing a future rulemaking on
nationwide car rental company goals.
The Department will also continue to
look for input from stakeholders when
drafting any future rule on this subject.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Mar 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
ACDBE Banks and Financial
Institutions Size Standards
A number of comments said that
financial industry regulators (e.g., the
Federal Reserve Board of Governors, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
the Office of the Comptroller of
Currency, and the Office of Thrift
Supervision) and the banking industry
itself consider banks with less than $1
billion in assets to be ‘‘small’’
institutions. These comments went on
to point out that the assets needed to
operate any financial institution are
high, even for the smallest banks,
because of compliance burdens and
technology expenses. In its comments,
the American Bankers Association
discussed the difference in efficiency
between banks with less than $1 billion
in assets and banks with over $1 billion
in assets. A December 5, 2006 report
from the American Bankers Association
stated that the largest minority bank has
assets of $638 million. The report also
states that 61% of all black owned banks
have assets under $100 million.
The existing rule imposes a $275
million asset limit for banks and
financial institutions. This final rule
increases the dollar amount of assets
that a bank or financial institution may
have while still remaining eligible to
participate in the ACDBE program; the
new limit is $750 million. The new size
standard will more closely approach the
‘‘small’’ bank and financial institution
standards referenced in the comments
while accommodating the size of actual
minority financial institutions. The new
standard will also reflect the size
differences between most minority
banks and the banking industry
generally.
ACDBE Automobile Dealer Size
Standards
Finally, the current rule has no
unique size standard for automobile
dealers. Some comments suggested that
the size standard for automobile dealers
selling vehicles to car rental
concessionaires at airports should be
based on the number of employees
working for a dealer. The comments
recommend an employee based size
standard because automobile dealers
who process sales of fleets of cars to car
rental companies (‘‘fleet dealers’’)
generate high gross sales, with the result
that few, if any, fleet dealers would
qualify as small businesses, under the
existing standard. A number of
commenters recommended that a 500employee size standard be created for
car dealers, which, in their view, would
ensure that all potential DBE car dealers
would qualify as small businesses.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15615
The Department believes that
commenters made a persuasive case for
replacing the current gross receipts
standard with an employee-based
standard. However, we are concerned
that using the suggested 500 employee
standard would go too far in the other
direction, encompassing all but a few of
all car dealers in the industry (2005
statistics from the National Association
of Automobile Dealers, for example,
state that the average number of
employees of a dealer was 53). We
believe that a small business standard
should not be so inclusive that the
distinction between smaller and larger
businesses is erased. At the same time,
we realize that ‘‘fleet dealers,’’ who sell
large numbers of cars to car rental
companies and other fleet purchasers,
are likely to have more employees than
the typical retail dealer. Consequently,
we are establishing a 200 employee
standard for purposes of this rule.
Fraud, Abuse, and Administrative
Burdens in the ACDBE Program
In the NPRM, the Department asked
for comment on ways to better monitor
the eligibility of ACDBEs as well as the
ongoing performance of ACDBEs in the
concession business. A number of
comments responded to this inquiry.
These comments suggested creating
additional reporting requirements,
detailed annual reviews, and more
detailed initial review of certification
applications. Some comments voiced
concern with the administrative
burdens from the monitoring and goal
setting that is already required by the
ACDBE program, pointing out that this
burden is especially significant for small
hub airports. The Department has
reviewed the current administrative
requirements of the rule and will not
change the process in this final rule.
The ACDBE program carefully balances
the benefits of administrative
requirements that are designed to
eliminate fraud and abuse with the
burdens associated with those
requirements, and we do not believe
that further regulatory provisions are
needed at this time.
Business Size Standards for the DBE
DOT Financial Assistance Programs
This rule also adjusts the gross
receipts cap for the Department’s
financial assistance programs in 49 CFR
Part 26. The existing DBE business size
limits became effective on August 10,
2005 with the passage of SAFETEA–LU.
Under the existing rule, if a firm’s
average annual gross receipts over the
preceding three fiscal years exceed
$19,570,000, then it cannot qualify as an
eligible DBE firm. SAFETEA–LU
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
15616
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 62 / Monday, April 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Section 1101 (b) (1) (a) instructs the
Secretary of Transportation to adjust
this amount annually for inflation. The
rule will provide for annual calculations
to make this adjustment, with future
adjustments made by final rule.
The inflation rate on purchases by
State and local governments for the
current year is calculated by dividing
the price deflator for the third quarter of
2006 (128.352) by 2005’s third quarter
price deflator (123.079). The result of
the calculation is 1.0428, which
represents an inflation rate of 4.28%
from the third quarter of 2005.
Multiplying the $19,570,000 figure for
disadvantaged business enterprises in
Department of Transportation financial
assistance programs by 1.0428 equals
$20,407,596, which will be rounded off
to the nearest $10,000, or $20,410,000.
Therefore, if a firm’s gross receipts,
averaged over the firm’s previous three
fiscal years, exceeds $20,410,000, then it
exceeds the small business size limit for
participation by disadvantaged business
enterprises in Department of
Transportation financial assistance
programs contained in the statutes and
in Part 26.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Corrections
This rule corrects an error in the
definition section of the original ACDBE
rule. In the first publication of the rule,
the definition of ‘‘small business
concern’’ incorrectly referred to § 23.23
for the applicable size standards. The
definition of a ‘‘small business concern’’
now refers readers to § 23.33 for
additional information on the size
standards necessary to qualify as a
‘‘small business concern.’’ In addition,
we are amending sec. 23.11 to add an
omitted reference to sec. 26.109,
concerning confidentiality of DBE
information.
Guidance Documents Issued by the
Department of Transportation
The changes to § 26.9 of 49 CFR Part
26 are intended to clarify the role of
guidance documents in the
Department’s Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (DBE) programs. Guidance
documents do not have the same
binding authority as a final ‘‘legislative’’
rule; however, guidance documents do
express the Department’s official view
of the meaning and application of our
rules. Consequently, we are deleting the
word ‘‘binding.’’
The change also clarifies that this
provision applies to guidance issued by
individual operating administrations as
well as by the Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (OST) or DOT as a
whole. For example, guidance could not
purport to express the official views of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Mar 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
FHWA, FTA, or FAA if it did not
comply with this provision. This
provision also applies to any guidance
or instructional material prepared by an
outside party (e.g., a trade association)
that is endorsed in any way or used in
training sessions sponsored by DOT or
any of its modal administrations.
Section 26.9, as originally drafted, was
intended to have this effect. However,
because some questions have been
raised about whether the language of the
section effectively covers modalspecific, as distinct from Departmentwide, guidance we are making the
language of this section even more
specific.
For the same reasons, this rule makes
a parallel change to § 23.13 of 49 CFR
Part 23. We also note that the review
mechanism specified in these sections
would be the method through which the
Department would comply with
provisions of the recently-issued
Executive Order 13422 and OMB
Bulletin on Good Guidance Practices for
any guidance issued by the Department
that would be considered to be
significant guidance.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
This rule is non-significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and
the Department of Transportation’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures. The
rule is an essentially ministerial
adjustment for inflation of a statutory
small business size standard that does
not change the standard in real dollar
terms. It will not impose burdens on any
regulated parties. This rule does not
have Federalism impacts sufficient to
warrant consultation with state and
local officials. The rule does not impose
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The only effect of the rule on small
entities is to allow some small
businesses to continue to participate in
the ACDBE and the DBE programs by
adjusting for inflation and modifying
the size standards as measured by
average annual gross receipts, total asset
amounts, and total number of
employees. Therefore, I certify that the
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Since this rule
pertains to a nondiscrimination
requirement and affects only Federal
financial assistance programs, the
Unfunded Mandates Act does not apply.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 23
Administrative practice and
procedure, Airports, Civil rights,
Concessions, Government contracts,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Grant programs—transportation,
Minority businesses, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 26
Administrative practice and
procedure, Airports, Civil rights,
Concessions, Government contracts,
Grant programs—transportation,
Highways and roads, Mass
transportation, Minority business,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Department of Transportation
amends 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26 as
follows:
PART 23—PARTICIPATION OF
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISE IN AIRPORT
CONCESSIONS
1. The authority citation for part 23
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 200d et seq.; 49 U.S.C.
47107 and 47123; Executive Order 12138, 3
CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 393.
2. Amend § 23.3 by revising the
definition of ‘‘Small business concern’’
to read as follows:
I
§ 23.3 What do the terms in this part
mean?
* * *
Small business concern means a for
profit business that does not exceed the
size standards of § 23.33 of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 23.11
[Amended]
3. Amend § 23.11 by removing
‘‘26.107’’ and adding in its place ‘‘sec.
26.109’’.
I 4. Amend § 23.13 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
I
§ 23.13 How does the Department issue
guidance, interpretations, exemptions, and
waivers pertaining to this part?
(a) Only guidance and interpretations
(including interpretations set forth in
certification appeal decisions)
consistent with this part 23 and issued
after April 21, 2005, express the official
positions and views of the Department
of Transportation or the Federal
Aviation Administration.
(b) The Secretary of Transportation,
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, and the FAA may issue
written interpretations of or written
guidance concerning this part. Written
interpretations and guidance are valid,
and express the official positions and
views of the Department of
Transportation or the FAA, only if they
are issued over the signature of the
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 62 / Monday, April 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Secretary of Transportation or if they
contain the following statement:
The General Counsel of the Department of
Transportation has reviewed this document
and approved it as consistent with the
language and intent of 49 CFR part 23.
I
5. Revise § 23.33 to read as follows:
§ 23.33 What size standards do recipients
use to determine the eligibility of ACDBEs?
(a) As a recipient, you must, except as
provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, treat a firm as a small business
eligible to be certified as an ACDBE if
its gross receipts, averaged over the
firm’s previous three fiscal years, do not
exceed $47.78 million.
(b) The following types of businesses
have size standards that differ from the
standard set forth in paragraph (a) of
this section:
(1) Banks and financial institutions:
$750 million in assets;
(2) Car rental companies: $63.71
million average annual gross receipts
over the firm’s three previous fiscal
years;
(3) Companies providing pay
telephones: 1,500 employees;
(4) Automobile dealers: 200
employees.
(c) The Department adjusts the
numbers in paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) of
this section using the Department of
Commerce price deflators for purchases
by state and local governments as the
basis for this adjustment. These
adjustments are made every two years
from May 2, 2007. The Department
publishes a final rule informing the
public of each adjustment.
PART 26—PARTICIPATION BY
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISES IN DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 26
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 324; 42 U.S.C. 2000d
et seq.; 49 U.S.C 1615, 47107, 47113, 47123;
Sec. 1101(b), Pub. L. 105–178, 112 Stat. 107,
113.
I
2. Revise § 26.9 to read as follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 26.9 How does the Department issue
guidance and interpretations under this
part?
Transportation, FHWA, FTA, and FAA
may issue written interpretations of or
written guidance concerning this part.
Written interpretations and guidance are
valid, and express the official positions
and views of the Department of
Transportation or any of its operating
administrations, only if they are issued
over the signature of the Secretary of
Transportation or if they contain the
following statement:
The General Counsel of the Department of
Transportation has reviewed this document
and approved it as consistent with the
language and intent of 49 CFR part 26.
I
3. Revise § 26.65 to read as follows:
§ 26.65 What rules govern business size
determinations?
(a) To be an eligible DBE, a firm
(including its affiliates) must be an
existing small business, as defined by
Small Business Administration (SBA)
standards. As a recipient, you must
apply current SBA business size
standard(s) found in 13 CFR part 121
appropriate to the type(s) of work the
firm seeks to perform in DOT-assisted
contracts.
(b) Even if it meets the requirements
of paragraph (a) of this section, a firm
is not an eligible DBE in any Federal
fiscal year if the firm (including its
affiliates) has had average annual gross
receipts, as defined by SBA regulations
(see 13 CFR 121.402), over the firm’s
previous three fiscal years, in excess of
$20.41 million.
(c) The Department adjusts the
number in paragraph (b) of this section
using the Department of Commerce
price deflators for purchases by State
and local governments as the basis for
this adjustment. The Department issues
a final rule by August 10 of each year
making this adjustment.
Issued this 20 day of March 2007, at
Washington DC.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. E7–6054 Filed 3–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
15:27 Mar 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 061121304–7053–02; I.D.
112006B]
RIN 0648–AT87
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Gulf Red
Snapper Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; interim
measures.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule implements
interim measures to reduce overfishing
of Gulf red snapper. This final rule
reduces the commercial and recreational
quotas for red snapper, reduces the
commercial minimum size limit for red
snapper, reduces the recreational bag
limit for Gulf red snapper, prohibits the
retention of red snapper under the bag
limit for captain and crew of a vessel
operating as a charter vessel or
headboat, and establishes a target level
of reduction of shrimp trawl bycatch
mortality of red snapper. The intended
effect is to reduce overfishing of red
snapper in the Gulf of Mexico.
DATES: This final rule is effective May 2,
2007 through September 29, 2007,
except for amendments to § 622.37,
which are effective April 2, 2007
through September 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Copies of documents
supporting this final rule, including a
final environmental impact statement
(FEIS), a Record of Decision (ROD), and
a final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA), may be obtained from Peter
Hood, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS,
263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg,
FL 33701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Hood, telephone: 727–551–5784,
fax: 727–824–5308, e-mail:
peter.hood@noaa.gov.
The red
snapper fishery of the Gulf of Mexico is
managed under the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef
Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, and
the shrimp fishery is managed under the
FMP for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf
of Mexico. The FMPs were prepared by
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Council) and are implemented
under the authority of the Magnuson-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(a) Only guidance and interpretations
(including interpretations set forth in
certification appeal decisions)
consistent with this part 26 and issued
after March 4, 1999 express the official
positions and views of the Department
of Transportation or any of its operating
administrations.
(b) The Secretary of Transportation,
Office of the Secretary of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
PO 00000
15617
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15614-15617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6054]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Parts 23 and 26
[Docket OST-97-2550]
RIN 2105-AD51
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document adjusts the dollar limits and size limits used
to define small businesses for the Department of Transportation's
Airport Concessions Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) program.
The Department of Transportation amends these size limits in order to
ensure that the opportunity of small businesses to participate in the
ACDBE program remains unchanged after taking inflation into account.
This document, as required by statute, also adjusts the dollar limits
used to define small businesses for the Department of Transportation's
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program, which applies to State
and local highway, transit, and airport recipients of DOT financial
assistance. This document also corrects a reference error in a previous
final rule. Finally, this document makes minor changes to the language
of a previous rule in order to accurately explain the role of
administrative guidance material.
DATES: This rule is effective May 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Ashby, Deputy Assistant
General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, Department of
Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW., Room 10424, Washington, DC 20590,
phone numbers (202) 366-9310 (voice), (202) 3669313 (fax), (202) 755-
7687 (TTY), bob.ashby@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 22, 2005, the Department published a final rule revising
49 CFR Part 23--the regulation governing the airport concessions
disadvantaged business enterprise (ACDBE) program. On the same day, the
Department published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
(SNPRM) on the business size standards for eligibility in the ACDBE
program as well as on two other matters concerning implementation of
the program. This final rule addresses the issues raised in the SNPRM
and the comments made in response to the SNPRM.
The DBE Airport Concessions and Contracting Programs
The DOT-assisted contracts DBE rule and airport concessions DBE
rule are based on different statutes. Each statute applies to a
distinct type of business that may seek DOT financial assistance. The
ACDBE program is designed to give business opportunities to certain
small business concerns that operate at airports and that are owned and
controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. The
ACDBE program is mandated by 49 U.S.C. 47107(e), originally enacted in
1987 and amended in 1992.
The DBE program for DOT-assisted contracts is a statutory program
intended to ensure nondiscriminatory contracting opportunities for
small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and
economically disadvantaged individuals in the Department's highway,
mass transit and airport financial assistance programs. The statutory
provision governing the DBE program in the highway and mass transit
financial assistance programs is 1101(b) of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU), Public Law 109-59, August 10, 2005. The statutory
provision governing the DBE program as it relates to the airport
planning and airport development financial assistance programs is 49
U.S.C. 47113.
ACDBE Gross Receipts Size Standards
The ACDBE program is designed to help small business concerns,
owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged
individuals, become self-sufficient and able to compete with non-
disadvantaged firms. Under the current DOT rule, if the airport
concessions firm's annual gross receipts averaged over the preceding
three fiscal years exceed $30 million, then it is not considered a
small business eligible to be certified as an ACDBE. The Department
notes that the existing size standards have not been adjusted for
inflation since June 1, 1992. This final rule adjusts the size
standards for eligibility as an ACDBE.
A number of comments submitted to the Department supported
adjusting the gross receipts size limit for inflation. One comment
suggested that the Department consider distinct size standards for each
type of concession. A number of comments also suggested that an
employee based size standard is inappropriate because businesses may
operate using different business model configurations with different
numbers of employees. These comments also point out that verifying the
number of employees is more complex than verifying gross receipts,
which are recorded in tax returns.
This final rule adjusts the general ACDBE gross receipts cap for
inflation. This rule only applies an employee based size standard if
the business operates pay telephones or if the business is an
automobile dealer. The Department views a general gross receipts size
limit that is adjusted for inflation as the most efficient and fair way
to establish size limits for the ACDBE program. The adjustment
compensates for the rise in the general level of prices over time from
the second quarter of 1992 to the third quarter of 2006. In order to
ensure that this adjustment is made on a more timely basis in the
future, the rule provides for a similar adjustment every two years,
using the same methods. At two year intervals, the Department will
publish a final rule to update the size standard numbers.
It should be emphasized that this action does not increase the size
standard for ACDBEs in real dollar terms. It simply maintains the
status quo, adjusting to 2006 dollars. A number of comments opposed the
idea of making Part 23 and Part 26 size standards identical because the
capitalization requirements for airport concessions are much higher.
The Department agrees and will not harmonize the standards.
In order to make an inflation adjustment to the gross receipts
figures, the Department of Transportation uses a Department of Commerce
price index. The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis
prepares constant dollar estimates of state and local government
purchases of goods and services by deflating current dollar estimates
by suitable price indexes. These indices include purchases of durable
and non-durable goods, and other services. Using these price deflators
enables the Department to adjust dollar figures for past years'
inflation. Given the nature of the Department's DBE Program and ACDBE
Program, adjusting the gross receipts cap in the same manner in which
inflation adjustments are made to the costs of state and local
government
[[Page 15615]]
purchases of goods and services is simple, accurate, and fair.
The inflation rate on purchases by State and local governments for
the current year is calculated by dividing the price deflator for the
third quarter of 2006 (128.352) by 1992's second quarter price deflator
(80.583). The result of the calculation is 1.5928, which represents an
inflation rate of 59.28% from the second quarter of 1992. Multiplying
the $30,000,000 figure for small business enterprises by 1.5928 equals
$47,784,000, which will be rounded off to the nearest $10,000, or
$47,780,000.
Therefore, under the new rule, if a firm's gross receipts, averaged
over the firm's previous three fiscal years, exceeds $47,780,000, then
it exceeds the airport concessions small business size limit contained
in Part 23.
ACDBE Car Rental Company Size Standards
Under the existing rule, car rental companies are not eligible to
participate in the ACDBE program if their average gross receipts over
the three previous fiscal years exceed $40 million. This final rule
adjusts the size standard for car rental companies to reflect the
effects of inflation on the real dollar value.
The inflation rate on purchases by State and local governments for
the current year is calculated by dividing the price deflator for the
third quarter of 2006 (128.352) by 1992's second quarter price deflator
(80.583). The result of the calculation is 1.5928, which represents an
inflation rate of 59.28% from the second quarter of 1992. Multiplying
the $40,000,000 figure for car rental companies by 1.5928 equals
$63,712,000, which will be rounded off to the nearest $10,000, or
$63,710,000.
Therefore, under the new rule, if a car rental company's gross
receipts, averaged over the company's previous three fiscal years,
exceeds $63,710,000, then it exceeds the airport concessions car rental
company size limit contained in Part 23.
A number of comments also supported establishing car rental goals
on a nationwide basis for car rental agencies with a nationwide
presence. The Department recognizes that a number of issues need to be
considered before such a rule can be published. The Department will
continue to consider developing a future rulemaking on nationwide car
rental company goals. The Department will also continue to look for
input from stakeholders when drafting any future rule on this subject.
ACDBE Banks and Financial Institutions Size Standards
A number of comments said that financial industry regulators (e.g.,
the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency, and the Office
of Thrift Supervision) and the banking industry itself consider banks
with less than $1 billion in assets to be ``small'' institutions. These
comments went on to point out that the assets needed to operate any
financial institution are high, even for the smallest banks, because of
compliance burdens and technology expenses. In its comments, the
American Bankers Association discussed the difference in efficiency
between banks with less than $1 billion in assets and banks with over
$1 billion in assets. A December 5, 2006 report from the American
Bankers Association stated that the largest minority bank has assets of
$638 million. The report also states that 61% of all black owned banks
have assets under $100 million.
The existing rule imposes a $275 million asset limit for banks and
financial institutions. This final rule increases the dollar amount of
assets that a bank or financial institution may have while still
remaining eligible to participate in the ACDBE program; the new limit
is $750 million. The new size standard will more closely approach the
``small'' bank and financial institution standards referenced in the
comments while accommodating the size of actual minority financial
institutions. The new standard will also reflect the size differences
between most minority banks and the banking industry generally.
ACDBE Automobile Dealer Size Standards
Finally, the current rule has no unique size standard for
automobile dealers. Some comments suggested that the size standard for
automobile dealers selling vehicles to car rental concessionaires at
airports should be based on the number of employees working for a
dealer. The comments recommend an employee based size standard because
automobile dealers who process sales of fleets of cars to car rental
companies (``fleet dealers'') generate high gross sales, with the
result that few, if any, fleet dealers would qualify as small
businesses, under the existing standard. A number of commenters
recommended that a 500-employee size standard be created for car
dealers, which, in their view, would ensure that all potential DBE car
dealers would qualify as small businesses.
The Department believes that commenters made a persuasive case for
replacing the current gross receipts standard with an employee-based
standard. However, we are concerned that using the suggested 500
employee standard would go too far in the other direction, encompassing
all but a few of all car dealers in the industry (2005 statistics from
the National Association of Automobile Dealers, for example, state that
the average number of employees of a dealer was 53). We believe that a
small business standard should not be so inclusive that the distinction
between smaller and larger businesses is erased. At the same time, we
realize that ``fleet dealers,'' who sell large numbers of cars to car
rental companies and other fleet purchasers, are likely to have more
employees than the typical retail dealer. Consequently, we are
establishing a 200 employee standard for purposes of this rule.
Fraud, Abuse, and Administrative Burdens in the ACDBE Program
In the NPRM, the Department asked for comment on ways to better
monitor the eligibility of ACDBEs as well as the ongoing performance of
ACDBEs in the concession business. A number of comments responded to
this inquiry. These comments suggested creating additional reporting
requirements, detailed annual reviews, and more detailed initial review
of certification applications. Some comments voiced concern with the
administrative burdens from the monitoring and goal setting that is
already required by the ACDBE program, pointing out that this burden is
especially significant for small hub airports. The Department has
reviewed the current administrative requirements of the rule and will
not change the process in this final rule. The ACDBE program carefully
balances the benefits of administrative requirements that are designed
to eliminate fraud and abuse with the burdens associated with those
requirements, and we do not believe that further regulatory provisions
are needed at this time.
Business Size Standards for the DBE DOT Financial Assistance Programs
This rule also adjusts the gross receipts cap for the Department's
financial assistance programs in 49 CFR Part 26. The existing DBE
business size limits became effective on August 10, 2005 with the
passage of SAFETEA-LU. Under the existing rule, if a firm's average
annual gross receipts over the preceding three fiscal years exceed
$19,570,000, then it cannot qualify as an eligible DBE firm. SAFETEA-LU
[[Page 15616]]
Section 1101 (b) (1) (a) instructs the Secretary of Transportation to
adjust this amount annually for inflation. The rule will provide for
annual calculations to make this adjustment, with future adjustments
made by final rule.
The inflation rate on purchases by State and local governments for
the current year is calculated by dividing the price deflator for the
third quarter of 2006 (128.352) by 2005's third quarter price deflator
(123.079). The result of the calculation is 1.0428, which represents an
inflation rate of 4.28% from the third quarter of 2005. Multiplying the
$19,570,000 figure for disadvantaged business enterprises in Department
of Transportation financial assistance programs by 1.0428 equals
$20,407,596, which will be rounded off to the nearest $10,000, or
$20,410,000.
Therefore, if a firm's gross receipts, averaged over the firm's
previous three fiscal years, exceeds $20,410,000, then it exceeds the
small business size limit for participation by disadvantaged business
enterprises in Department of Transportation financial assistance
programs contained in the statutes and in Part 26.
Corrections
This rule corrects an error in the definition section of the
original ACDBE rule. In the first publication of the rule, the
definition of ``small business concern'' incorrectly referred to Sec.
23.23 for the applicable size standards. The definition of a ``small
business concern'' now refers readers to Sec. 23.33 for additional
information on the size standards necessary to qualify as a ``small
business concern.'' In addition, we are amending sec. 23.11 to add an
omitted reference to sec. 26.109, concerning confidentiality of DBE
information.
Guidance Documents Issued by the Department of Transportation
The changes to Sec. 26.9 of 49 CFR Part 26 are intended to clarify
the role of guidance documents in the Department's Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise (DBE) programs. Guidance documents do not have the
same binding authority as a final ``legislative'' rule; however,
guidance documents do express the Department's official view of the
meaning and application of our rules. Consequently, we are deleting the
word ``binding.''
The change also clarifies that this provision applies to guidance
issued by individual operating administrations as well as by the Office
of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) or DOT as a whole. For
example, guidance could not purport to express the official views of
FHWA, FTA, or FAA if it did not comply with this provision. This
provision also applies to any guidance or instructional material
prepared by an outside party (e.g., a trade association) that is
endorsed in any way or used in training sessions sponsored by DOT or
any of its modal administrations. Section 26.9, as originally drafted,
was intended to have this effect. However, because some questions have
been raised about whether the language of the section effectively
covers modal-specific, as distinct from Department-wide, guidance we
are making the language of this section even more specific.
For the same reasons, this rule makes a parallel change to Sec.
23.13 of 49 CFR Part 23. We also note that the review mechanism
specified in these sections would be the method through which the
Department would comply with provisions of the recently-issued
Executive Order 13422 and OMB Bulletin on Good Guidance Practices for
any guidance issued by the Department that would be considered to be
significant guidance.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
This rule is non-significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866
and the Department of Transportation's Regulatory Policies and
Procedures. The rule is an essentially ministerial adjustment for
inflation of a statutory small business size standard that does not
change the standard in real dollar terms. It will not impose burdens on
any regulated parties. This rule does not have Federalism impacts
sufficient to warrant consultation with state and local officials. The
rule does not impose information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
The only effect of the rule on small entities is to allow some
small businesses to continue to participate in the ACDBE and the DBE
programs by adjusting for inflation and modifying the size standards as
measured by average annual gross receipts, total asset amounts, and
total number of employees. Therefore, I certify that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Since this rule pertains to a nondiscrimination requirement
and affects only Federal financial assistance programs, the Unfunded
Mandates Act does not apply.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 23
Administrative practice and procedure, Airports, Civil rights,
Concessions, Government contracts, Grant programs--transportation,
Minority businesses, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 26
Administrative practice and procedure, Airports, Civil rights,
Concessions, Government contracts, Grant programs--transportation,
Highways and roads, Mass transportation, Minority business, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of
Transportation amends 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26 as follows:
PART 23--PARTICIPATION OF DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE IN
AIRPORT CONCESSIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 200d et seq.; 49 U.S.C. 47107 and 47123;
Executive Order 12138, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 393.
0
2. Amend Sec. 23.3 by revising the definition of ``Small business
concern'' to read as follows:
Sec. 23.3 What do the terms in this part mean?
* * *
Small business concern means a for profit business that does not
exceed the size standards of Sec. 23.33 of this part.
* * * * *
Sec. 23.11 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 23.11 by removing ``26.107'' and adding in its place
``sec. 26.109''.
0
4. Amend Sec. 23.13 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 23.13 How does the Department issue guidance, interpretations,
exemptions, and waivers pertaining to this part?
(a) Only guidance and interpretations (including interpretations
set forth in certification appeal decisions) consistent with this part
23 and issued after April 21, 2005, express the official positions and
views of the Department of Transportation or the Federal Aviation
Administration.
(b) The Secretary of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, and the FAA may issue written interpretations of or
written guidance concerning this part. Written interpretations and
guidance are valid, and express the official positions and views of the
Department of Transportation or the FAA, only if they are issued over
the signature of the
[[Page 15617]]
Secretary of Transportation or if they contain the following statement:
The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has
reviewed this document and approved it as consistent with the
language and intent of 49 CFR part 23.
0
5. Revise Sec. 23.33 to read as follows:
Sec. 23.33 What size standards do recipients use to determine the
eligibility of ACDBEs?
(a) As a recipient, you must, except as provided in paragraph (b)
of this section, treat a firm as a small business eligible to be
certified as an ACDBE if its gross receipts, averaged over the firm's
previous three fiscal years, do not exceed $47.78 million.
(b) The following types of businesses have size standards that
differ from the standard set forth in paragraph (a) of this section:
(1) Banks and financial institutions: $750 million in assets;
(2) Car rental companies: $63.71 million average annual gross
receipts over the firm's three previous fiscal years;
(3) Companies providing pay telephones: 1,500 employees;
(4) Automobile dealers: 200 employees.
(c) The Department adjusts the numbers in paragraphs (a) and (b)(2)
of this section using the Department of Commerce price deflators for
purchases by state and local governments as the basis for this
adjustment. These adjustments are made every two years from May 2,
2007. The Department publishes a final rule informing the public of
each adjustment.
PART 26--PARTICIPATION BY DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 26 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 324; 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.; 49 U.S.C
1615, 47107, 47113, 47123; Sec. 1101(b), Pub. L. 105-178, 112 Stat.
107, 113.
0
2. Revise Sec. 26.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 26.9 How does the Department issue guidance and interpretations
under this part?
(a) Only guidance and interpretations (including interpretations
set forth in certification appeal decisions) consistent with this part
26 and issued after March 4, 1999 express the official positions and
views of the Department of Transportation or any of its operating
administrations.
(b) The Secretary of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, FHWA, FTA, and FAA may issue written interpretations of
or written guidance concerning this part. Written interpretations and
guidance are valid, and express the official positions and views of the
Department of Transportation or any of its operating administrations,
only if they are issued over the signature of the Secretary of
Transportation or if they contain the following statement:
The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has
reviewed this document and approved it as consistent with the
language and intent of 49 CFR part 26.
0
3. Revise Sec. 26.65 to read as follows:
Sec. 26.65 What rules govern business size determinations?
(a) To be an eligible DBE, a firm (including its affiliates) must
be an existing small business, as defined by Small Business
Administration (SBA) standards. As a recipient, you must apply current
SBA business size standard(s) found in 13 CFR part 121 appropriate to
the type(s) of work the firm seeks to perform in DOT-assisted
contracts.
(b) Even if it meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section, a firm is not an eligible DBE in any Federal fiscal year if
the firm (including its affiliates) has had average annual gross
receipts, as defined by SBA regulations (see 13 CFR 121.402), over the
firm's previous three fiscal years, in excess of $20.41 million.
(c) The Department adjusts the number in paragraph (b) of this
section using the Department of Commerce price deflators for purchases
by State and local governments as the basis for this adjustment. The
Department issues a final rule by August 10 of each year making this
adjustment.
Issued this 20 day of March 2007, at Washington DC.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. E7-6054 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P