Notice of Request for Extension and Revision of a Currently Approved Information Collection, 15131-15132 [07-1556]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices
impact of mandatory-random drug
testing policies in high schools and to
determine if mandatory-random drug
testing policies result in less reported
use of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit
substances among a group of students in
participating high schools compared to
a comparable group of students in high
schools that do not operate a
mandatory-random drug testing
program.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
The Department may disclose
information contained in a record in
this system of records under the routine
uses listed in this system of records
without the consent of the individual if
the disclosure is compatible with the
purposes for which the record was
collected. These disclosures may be
made on a case-by-case basis or, if the
Department has complied with the
computer matching requirements of the
Privacy Act, under a computer matching
agreement. Any disclosure of
individually identifiable information
from a record in this system must also
comply with the requirements of section
183 of the ESRA (20 U.S.C. 9573)
providing for confidentiality standards
that apply to all collections, reporting,
and publication of data by IES.
Contract Disclosure. If the Department
contracts with an entity for the purposes
of performing any function that requires
disclosure of records in this system to
employees of the contractor, the
Department may disclose the records to
those employees. Before entering into
such a contract, the Department shall
require the contractor to maintain
Privacy Act safeguards as required
under 5 U.S.C. 552a(m) with respect to
the records in the system.
DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING
AGENCIES:
Not applicable to this system notice.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
RETRIEVABILITY:
Records in this system are indexed by
a number assigned to each individual
that is cross referenced by the
individual’s name on a separate list.
SAFEGUARDS:
All physical access to the
Department’s site and to the sites of the
Jkt 211001
If you wish to determine whether a
record exists regarding you in the
system of records, contact the systems
manager. Your request must meet the
requirements of regulations at 34 CFR
5b.5, including proof of identity.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURE:
If you wish to gain access to your
record in the system of records, contact
the system manager. Your request must
meet the requirements of regulations at
34 CFR 5b.5, including proof of identity.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURE:
If you wish to contest the content of
a record regarding you in the system of
records, contact the system manager.
Your request must meet the
requirements of the regulations at 34
CFR 5b.7, including proof of identity.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
The system will contain information
about two cohorts of approximately 200
high school students each of (i) 26 high
schools operating the mandatoryrandom drug testing program and (ii) 26
high schools that will not operate the
program but that will serve as control
high schools for this evaluation. The
total number of high school students
included in this system of records will
be approximately 10,400 in each of
school years 2006–07 and 2007–08. The
52 participating high schools will be
from school districts that are recipients
of the grants for School-Based Student
Drug-Testing Programs that were
announced in 2006 by OSDFS.
The system of records will include
information about the high school
students participating in the evaluation
including the students’ names;
addresses; demographic information
such as race/ethnicity, gender, age, and
educational background; and attitudes
and beliefs concerning substance use,
and substance use itself.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
The Department maintains records on
CD-ROM, and the contractor and
subcontractor maintain data for this
system on computers and in hard copy.
15:49 Mar 29, 2007
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
[FR Doc. E7–5933 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
STORAGE:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Department’s contractor and
subcontractor, where this system of
records is maintained, is controlled and
monitored by security personnel. The
computer system employed by the
Department offers a high degree of
resistance to tampering and
circumvention. This security system
limits data access to Department and
contract staff on a ‘‘need to know’’ basis,
and controls individual users’ ability to
access and alter records within the
system. The contractor and
subcontractor will establish similar sets
of procedures at their sites to ensure
confidentiality of data. Their systems
are required to ensure that information
identifying individuals is in files
physically separated from other research
data. The contractor and subcontractor
will maintain security of the complete
set of all master data files and
documentation. Access to individually
identifiable data will be strictly
controlled. At each site all data will be
kept in locked file cabinets during
nonworking hours, and work on
hardcopy data will take place in a single
room, except for data entry. Physical
security of electronic data will also be
maintained. Security features that
protect project data include: passwordprotected accounts that authorize users
to use the contractor’s and
subcontractor’s systems but to access
only specific network directories and
network software; user rights and
directory and file attributes that limit
those who can use particular directories
and files and determine how they can
use them; e-mail passwords that
authorize the user to access mail
services; and additional security
features that the network administrators
will establish for projects as needed.
The contractor and subcontractor
employees who ‘‘maintain’’ (collect,
maintain, use, or disseminate) data in
this system shall comply with the
requirements of the confidentiality
standards in section 183 of the ESRA
(20 U.S.C. 9573).
15131
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Records are maintained and disposed
of in accordance with the Department’s
Records Disposition Schedules (Section
Ed/RDS, Part 3, Item 2b and Part 3, Item
5a).
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
SYSTEM MANAGER AND ADDRESS:
Director, Evaluation Division,
National Center for Education
Evaluation and Regional Assistance,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.
Department of Education, 555 New
Jersey Avenue, NW., room 502D,
Washington, DC 20208.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Request for Extension and
Revision of a Currently Approved
Information Collection
U.S. Election Assistance
Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
15132
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices
notice announces the U.S. Election
Assistance Commission’s (EAC)
intention to request an extension and
revision of a currently approved
collection. The information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on January 24, 2007, at 72 FR
3127. The notice allowed for a 60-day
public comment period. No comments
were received on this information
collection. The purpose of this notice is
to allow an additional 30 days for public
comments. Comments are encouraged
and will be accepted until April 27,
2007. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt,
Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10235, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202)
395–7316.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the above address or call
Mr. Brian Hancock at (202) 566–3100.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: EAC Voting System Testing and
Certification Program Manual.
OMB Number: 3265–0004.
Type of Review: Extension with
change of a currently approved
collection.
Needs and Uses: HAVA requires that
the EAC certify and decertify voting
systems (42 U.S.C. 15371). Section
231(a)(1) of HAVA specifically requires
the EAC to ‘‘* * * provide for the
certification, decertification and
recertification of voting system
hardware and software by accredited
laboratories.’’ The EAC will perform this
mandated function through the use of
its Voting System Testing and
Certification Program. Voting systems
certified by the EAC will be used by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Mar 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
citizens to cast votes in Federal
Elections. Therefore, it is paramount
that the program operates in a reliable
and effective manner. In order to certify
a voting system, it is necessary for the
EAC to (1) Require voting system
manufacturers to submit information
about their organization and the voting
systems they submit for testing and
certification; (2) require voting system
manufacturers to retain voting system
technical and test records; and (3) to
provide a mechanism for election
officials to report events which may
effect a voting system’s certification.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit institutions and state and local
election officials.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 94
annually.
Total Annual Responses: 99 annually.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 119 hours.
Donetta L. Davidson,
Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–1556 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–M
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Notice
United States Election
Assistance Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Public Teleconference
Meetings for the Working
Subcommittees of the Technical
Guidelines Development Committee.
AGENCY:
DATES AND TIMES:
Tuesday, April 3, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
Thursday, April 5 at 11 a.m. ET.
Thursday, April 5 at 1 p.m. ET.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.
ET.
Thursday, April 12 at 11 a.m. ET.
Friday, April 13 at 11 a.m. ET.
Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.
ET.
Thursday, April 19 at 11 a.m. ET.
Friday, April 20 at 11 a.m. ET.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.
ET.
Thursday, April 26 at 11 a.m. ET.
Thursday, April 26 at 1 p.m. ET.
Tuesday, May 1, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
Thursday, May 3 at 11 a.m. ET.
Friday, May 4 at 11 a.m. ET.
Tuesday, May 8, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
Thursday, May 10 at 11 a.m. ET.
Friday, May 11 at 11 a.m. ET.
Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
Thursday, May 17 at 11 a.m. ET.
Friday, May 18 at 11 a.m. ET.
Tuesday, May 22, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
Friday, May 25 at 11 a.m. ET.
STATUS: Audio recordings of working
subcommittee teleconferences are
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
available upon conclusion of each
meeting at: https://vote.nist.gov/
subcomm_mtgs.htm. Agendas for each
teleconference will be posted one week
in advance of each meeting at the above
Web site.
SUMMARY: The Technical Guidelines
Development Committee (the
‘‘Development Committee’’) was
established to act in the public interest
to assist the Executive Director of the
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
(EAC) in the development of voluntary
voting system guidelines. The
Committee held their first plenary
meeting on July 9, 2004. At this
meeting, the Development Committee
agreed to a resolution forming three
working groups: (1) Human Factors &
Privacy; (2) Security & Transparency;
and (3) Core Requirements & Testing to
gather and analyze information on
relevant issues. These working
subcommittees propose resolutions to
the TGDC on best practices,
specifications and standards.
Specifically, NIST staff and Committee
members will meet via the above
scheduled teleconferences to review and
discuss progress on tasks defined in
resolutions passed at Development
Committee plenary meetings. The
resolutions define technical work tasks
for NIST that will assist the Committee
in developing recommendations for
voluntary voting system guidelines. The
Committee met in its eighth plenary
session on March 22–23, 2007.
Documents and transcriptions of
Committee proceedings are available at:
https://vote.nist.gov/
PublicHearingsandMeeting.html.
The
Technical Guidelines Development
Committee (the ‘‘Development
Committee’’) was established pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 15361, to act in the public
interest to assist the Executive Director
of the Election Assistance Commission
in the development of the voluntary
voting system guidelines. The
information gathered and analyzed by
the working subcommittees during their
teleconference meetings will be
reviewed at future Development
Committee plenary meetings.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allan Eustis 301–975–5099. If a member
of the public would like to submit
written comments concerning the
Committee’s affairs at any time before or
after subcommittee teleconference
meetings, written comments should be
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15131-15132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1556]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Notice of Request for Extension and Revision of a Currently
Approved Information Collection
AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
[[Page 15132]]
notice announces the U.S. Election Assistance Commission's (EAC)
intention to request an extension and revision of a currently approved
collection. The information collection was previously published in the
Federal Register on January 24, 2007, at 72 FR 3127. The notice allowed
for a 60-day public comment period. No comments were received on this
information collection. The purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comments. Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until April 27, 2007. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to OMB Reviewer: Alexander T.
Hunt, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments, please write to the above address or
call Mr. Brian Hancock at (202) 566-3100.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: EAC Voting System Testing and Certification Program Manual.
OMB Number: 3265-0004.
Type of Review: Extension with change of a currently approved
collection.
Needs and Uses: HAVA requires that the EAC certify and decertify
voting systems (42 U.S.C. 15371). Section 231(a)(1) of HAVA
specifically requires the EAC to ``* * * provide for the certification,
decertification and recertification of voting system hardware and
software by accredited laboratories.'' The EAC will perform this
mandated function through the use of its Voting System Testing and
Certification Program. Voting systems certified by the EAC will be used
by citizens to cast votes in Federal Elections. Therefore, it is
paramount that the program operates in a reliable and effective manner.
In order to certify a voting system, it is necessary for the EAC to (1)
Require voting system manufacturers to submit information about their
organization and the voting systems they submit for testing and
certification; (2) require voting system manufacturers to retain voting
system technical and test records; and (3) to provide a mechanism for
election officials to report events which may effect a voting system's
certification.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit institutions and
state and local election officials.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 94 annually.
Total Annual Responses: 99 annually.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 119 hours.
Donetta L. Davidson,
Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1556 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M