Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an Environmental Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 14581-14582 [E7-5634]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Notices
[FR Doc. E7–5631 Filed 3–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2007N–0091]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Preparing a Claim
of Categorical Exclusion or an
Environmental Assessment for
Submission to the Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection provisions in
the guidance document entitled
‘‘Preparing a Claim of Categorical
Exclusion or an Environmental
Assessment for Submission to the
Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition.’’
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by May 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to: https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief
Information Officer (HFA–250), Food
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
4659.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Mar 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Preparing a Claim of Categorical
Exclusion or an Environmental
Assessment for Submission to the
Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (OMB Control Number 0910–
0541)—Extension
As an integral part of its
decisionmaking process, FDA is
obligated under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) to consider the environmental
impact of its actions, including allowing
notifications for food contact substances
to become effective and approving food
additive petitions, color additive
petitions, GRAS affirmation petitions,
requests for exemption from regulation
as a food additive, and actions on
certain food labeling citizen petitions,
nutrient content claims petitions, and
health claims petitions. In 1997, FDA
amended its regulations in part 25 (21
CFR part 25) to provide for categorical
exclusions for additional classes of
actions that do not individually or
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14581
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment (62 FR 40570,
July 29, 1997). As a result of that
rulemaking, FDA no longer routinely
requires submission of information
about the manufacturing and production
of FDA-regulated articles. FDA also has
eliminated the previously required
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
abbreviated EA formats from the
amended regulations. Instead, FDA has
provided guidance that contains sample
formats to help industry submit a claim
of categorical exclusion or an EA to
CFSAN. The guidance document
entitled ‘‘Preparing a Claim of
Categorical Exclusion or an
Environmental Assessment for
Submission to the Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition’’
identifies, interprets, and clarifies
existing requirements imposed by
statute and regulation, consistent with
the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR 1507.3). It consists
of recommendations that do not
themselves create requirements; rather,
they are explanatory guidance for FDA’s
own procedures in order to ensure full
compliance with the purposes and
provisions of NEPA.
The guidance provides information to
assist in the preparation of claims of
categorical exclusion and EAs for
submission to CFSAN. The following
questions are covered in this guidance:
(1) What types of industry-initiated
actions are subject to a claim of
categorical exclusion? (2) What must a
claim of categorical exclusion include
by regulation? (3) What is an EA? (4)
When is an EA required by regulation
and what format should be used? (5)
What are extraordinary circumstances?
and (6) What suggestions does CFSAN
have for preparing an EA? Although
CFSAN encourages industry to use the
EA formats described in the guidance
because standardized documentation
submitted by industry increases the
efficiency of the review process,
alternative approaches may be used if
these approaches satisfy the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
FDA is requesting the extension of
OMB approval for the information
collection provisions in the guidance.
Description of Respondents: The
likely respondents include businesses
engaged in the manufacture or sale of
food, food ingredients, and substances
used in materials that come into contact
with food.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
14582
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 59 / Wednesday, March 28, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
21 CFR Section
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Burden
Hours
25.32(i)
52
3
156
1
156
25.32(o)
1
1
1
1
1
25.32(q)
7
2
14
1
14
Total
1There
171
The above estimates for respondents
and numbers of responses are based on
the annualized numbers of petitions and
notifications qualifying for § 25.32(i)
and (q) that the agency has received in
the past 3 years. Please note that, in the
past 3 years, there have been no
submissions that requested an action
that would have been subject to the
categorical exclusion in § 25.32(o). To
avoid counting this burden as zero, FDA
has estimated the burden for this
categorical exclusion at one respondent
making one submission a year for a total
of one annual submission.
To calculate the estimate for the hours
per response values, we assumed that
the information requested in this
guidance for each of these three
categorical exclusions is readily
available to the submitter. For the
information requested for the exclusion
in § 25.32(i), we expect that submitter
will need to gather information from
appropriate persons in the submitter’s
company and to prepare this
information for attachment to the claim
for categorical exclusion. We believe
that this effort should take no longer
than 1 hour per submission. For the
information requested for the exclusions
in § 25.32(o) and (q), the submitters will
almost always merely need to copy
existing documentation and attach it to
the claim for categorical exclusion. We
believe that collecting this information
should also take no longer than 1 hour
per submission.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7–5634 Filed 3–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
171
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Mar 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. 2003E–0243 and 2003E–0244]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; INFUSE BONE GRAFT/LT–
CAGE LUMBAR TAPERED FUSION
DEVICE
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for INFUSE
BONE GRAFT/LT–CAGE LUMBAR
TAPERED FUSION DEVICE and is
publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of two applications to
the Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of patents which claim that
medical device.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a medical device will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the medical device INFUSE BONE
GRAFT/LT–CAGE LUMBAR TAPERED
FUSION DEVICE. INFUSE BONE
GRAFT/LT–CAGE LUMBAR TAPERED
FUSION DEVICE is indicated for spinal
fusion procedures in skeletally mature
patients with degenerative disc disease
(DDD) at one level from L4—S1.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received two
patent term restoration applications for
INFUSE BONE GRAFT/LT–CAGE
LUMBAR TAPERED FUSION DEVICE
(U.S. Patent Nos. 5,782,919 and
5,984,967)) from SDGI Holdings, Inc.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining these patents’ eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
April 6, 2004, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this medical
device had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
INFUSE BONE GRAFT/LT–CAGE
LUMBAR TAPERED FUSION DEVICE
represented the first permitted
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14581-14582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2007N-0091]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an
Environmental Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
provisions in the guidance document entitled ``Preparing a Claim of
Categorical Exclusion or an Environmental Assessment for Submission to
the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.''
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by May 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to: https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. Submit written comments on
the collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief
Information Officer (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an Environmental
Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (OMB Control Number 0910-0541)--Extension
As an integral part of its decisionmaking process, FDA is obligated
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) to consider
the environmental impact of its actions, including allowing
notifications for food contact substances to become effective and
approving food additive petitions, color additive petitions, GRAS
affirmation petitions, requests for exemption from regulation as a food
additive, and actions on certain food labeling citizen petitions,
nutrient content claims petitions, and health claims petitions. In
1997, FDA amended its regulations in part 25 (21 CFR part 25) to
provide for categorical exclusions for additional classes of actions
that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment (62 FR 40570, July 29, 1997). As a result of that
rulemaking, FDA no longer routinely requires submission of information
about the manufacturing and production of FDA-regulated articles. FDA
also has eliminated the previously required Environmental Assessment
(EA) and abbreviated EA formats from the amended regulations. Instead,
FDA has provided guidance that contains sample formats to help industry
submit a claim of categorical exclusion or an EA to CFSAN. The guidance
document entitled ``Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an
Environmental Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition'' identifies, interprets, and clarifies existing
requirements imposed by statute and regulation, consistent with the
Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR 1507.3). It
consists of recommendations that do not themselves create requirements;
rather, they are explanatory guidance for FDA's own procedures in order
to ensure full compliance with the purposes and provisions of NEPA.
The guidance provides information to assist in the preparation of
claims of categorical exclusion and EAs for submission to CFSAN. The
following questions are covered in this guidance: (1) What types of
industry-initiated actions are subject to a claim of categorical
exclusion? (2) What must a claim of categorical exclusion include by
regulation? (3) What is an EA? (4) When is an EA required by regulation
and what format should be used? (5) What are extraordinary
circumstances? and (6) What suggestions does CFSAN have for preparing
an EA? Although CFSAN encourages industry to use the EA formats
described in the guidance because standardized documentation submitted
by industry increases the efficiency of the review process, alternative
approaches may be used if these approaches satisfy the requirements of
the applicable statutes and regulations.
FDA is requesting the extension of OMB approval for the information
collection provisions in the guidance.
Description of Respondents: The likely respondents include
businesses engaged in the manufacture or sale of food, food
ingredients, and substances used in materials that come into contact
with food.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 14582]]
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per Total Burden
21 CFR Section Respondents per Response Responses Response Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25.32(i) 52 3 156 1 156
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25.32(o) 1 1 1 1 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25.32(q) 7 2 14 1 14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total .............. ................. 171 .............. 171
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The above estimates for respondents and numbers of responses are
based on the annualized numbers of petitions and notifications
qualifying for Sec. 25.32(i) and (q) that the agency has received in
the past 3 years. Please note that, in the past 3 years, there have
been no submissions that requested an action that would have been
subject to the categorical exclusion in Sec. 25.32(o). To avoid
counting this burden as zero, FDA has estimated the burden for this
categorical exclusion at one respondent making one submission a year
for a total of one annual submission.
To calculate the estimate for the hours per response values, we
assumed that the information requested in this guidance for each of
these three categorical exclusions is readily available to the
submitter. For the information requested for the exclusion in Sec.
25.32(i), we expect that submitter will need to gather information from
appropriate persons in the submitter's company and to prepare this
information for attachment to the claim for categorical exclusion. We
believe that this effort should take no longer than 1 hour per
submission. For the information requested for the exclusions in Sec.
25.32(o) and (q), the submitters will almost always merely need to copy
existing documentation and attach it to the claim for categorical
exclusion. We believe that collecting this information should also take
no longer than 1 hour per submission.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7-5634 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S