List of Programs Eligible for Inclusion in Fiscal Year 2007 Funding Agreements With Self-Governance Tribes, 13820-13822 [E7-5343]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13820
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
The three alternatives are described
below.
Alternative 1 (Plan with Reduced
Take) would require a more
comprehensive implementation of
avoidance and minimization measures
than the proposed Plan. Specifically,
under Alternative 1, avoidance and
minimization measures would be
implemented for all activities, including
all small disturbance activities. These
additional requirements would reduce
take below the level anticipated under
the proposed Plan. Compensation ratios
for habitat loss or disturbance would be
the same as those for the proposed Plan.
Alternative 2 (Plan with Enhanced
Compensation) would provide
enhanced compensation for impacts that
cannot be avoided. Under Alternative 2,
both permanent and temporary losses of
suitable habitat would be compensated
at a 3:1 ratio. Loss of wetlands,
including vernal pools, would be
compensated at a 3:1 ratio if
compensation is accomplished through
an existing mitigation bank, and at a 6:1
ratio if compensation takes place
outside existing banks. Avoidance,
minimization measures, and thresholds
for implementation of avoidance and
minimization measures would be the
same as those for the proposed Plan.
Alternative 3 (Plan with Reduced
Number of Covered Species) would
cover fewer species than the proposed
Plan. The following species covered
under the proposed Plan would not be
covered under Alternative 3: the vernal
pool crustaceans, limestone salamander,
California red-legged frog, giant garter
snake, bank swallow, tricolored
blackbird, Buena Vista Lake shrew,
riparian brush rabbit, riparian woodrat,
Tipton kangaroo rat, and 11 plant
species. This alternative would focus on
those species that are currently Federal
or State listed and have been identified
as having more than 2 acres of habitat
likely to be disturbed by operations or
maintenance activities each year.
Avoidance and minimization measures,
thresholds for implementation of
avoidance and minimization measures,
and habitat compensation would be the
same as the proposed Plan.
Under the No-Action/No-Project
alternative, the proposed Plan would
not be adopted, and a permit pursuant
to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA would
not be issued by the Service.
Compliance with the ESA would
continue to be addressed on a case-bycase basis.
The final EIS/EIR is intended to
accomplish the following: inform the
public of the proposed Plan and the
alternatives, address public comments
received on the draft EIS/EIR; disclose
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
the direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental effects of the proposed
action and each of the alternatives; and
indicate any irreversible commitment of
resources that would result from the
implementation of the proposed Plan.
Dated: March 13, 2007.
Ken McDermond,
Deputy Manager, California/Nevada
Operations Office, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E7–5334 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Public Review
The Service and PG&E invite the
public to review the final EIS/EIR,
proposed Plan, and the IA during a 30day review period beginning on the date
of this notice. Written comments from
interested parties are welcome to ensure
that the issues of public concern related
to the proposed action are identified.
Comments and materials received will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. All
comments and materials received,
including names and addresses, will
become part of the administrative record
and may be released to the public. Our
practice is to make comments, including
names, home addresses, home phone
numbers, and email addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their names
and/or homes addresses, etc., but if you
wish us to consider withholding this
information you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. In addition, you must
present a rationale for withholding this
information. This rationale must
demonstrate that disclosure would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. Unsupported
assertions will not meet this burden. In
the absence of exceptional,
documentable circumstances, this
information will be released. We will
always make submissions from
organization or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives of or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
We provide this notice in order to
allow the public, agencies, or other
organizations to review and comment
on these final documents prior to our
decision, pursuant to section 10(a) of
the ESA and NEPA implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6 and
1506.10). The Service will evaluate the
permit application, the associated final
documents, and public comments
submitted thereon to prepare a public
Record of Decision (40 CFR 1505.2). No
Federal decision on the permit will be
made until at least 30 days after
publication of this notice and
subsequent issuance of the Record of
Decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
List of Programs Eligible for Inclusion
in Fiscal Year 2007 Funding
Agreements With Self-Governance
Tribes
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), publish this notice to
list programs or portions of our
programs that are eligible for inclusion
in Fiscal Year 2007 funding agreements
with self-governance tribes, and to list
programmatic targets pursuant to
section 405(c)(4) of the Tribal SelfGovernance Act.
DATES: This notice expires on
September 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct any inquiries or
comments about this notice to the
American Indian Liaison Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1849 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For questions
regarding self-governance, contact
Patrick Durham, Native American
Liaison, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20240; telephone, 202–208–4133; fax
202–208–3524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title II of the Indian SelfDetermination Act Amendments of 1994
(Pub. L. 103–413, the ‘‘Tribal SelfGovernance Act’’ or the ‘‘Act’’)
instituted a permanent self-governance
program at the Department of the
Interior (DOI). Under the selfgovernance program, certain programs,
services, functions, and activities, or
portions thereof, in DOI bureaus other
than the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
are eligible to be planned, conducted,
consolidated, and administered by a
self-governance tribal government.
Under section 405(c) of the Act, the
Secretary of the Interior is required to
publish annually: (1) A list of non-BIA
programs, services, functions, and
activities, or portions thereof, that are
eligible for inclusion in agreements
negotiated under the self-governance
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
program; and (2) programmatic targets
for these bureaus.
Under the Act, two categories of nonBIA programs are eligible for selfgovernance annual funding agreements
(AFAs):
(1) Under section 403(b)(2) of the Act,
any non-BIA program, service, function
or activity that is administered by DOI
that is ‘‘otherwise available to Indian
tribes or Indians’’ can be administered
by a tribal government through a selfgovernance AFA. The Department
interprets this provision to authorize the
inclusion of programs eligible for selfdetermination contracts under Title I of
the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93–
638, as amended). Section 403(b)(2) also
specifies: ‘‘nothing in this subsection
may be construed to provide any tribe
with a preference with respect to the
opportunity of the tribe to administer
programs, services, functions and
activities, or portions thereof, unless
such preference is otherwise provided
by law.’’
(2) Under section 403(c) of the Act,
the Secretary may include other
programs, services, functions, and
activities or portions thereof that are of
‘‘special geographic, historical, or
cultural significance’’ to a selfgovernance tribe.
Under section 403(k) of the Act, AFAs
cannot include programs, services,
functions, or activities that are
inherently Federal or where the statute
establishing the existing program does
not authorize the type of participation
sought by the tribe. However, a tribe (or
tribes) need not be identified in the
authorizing statutes in order for a
program or element to be included in a
self-governance AFA. While general
legal and policy guidance regarding
what constitutes an inherently Federal
function exists, we will determine
whether a specific function is inherently
Federal on a case-by-case basis
considering the totality of
circumstances.
The Office of Self-Governance
requested comments on the proposed
list for all bureaus on June 14, 2006. A
number of editorial and technical
changes were provided by Interior’s
bureaus and incorporated into separate
bureau-specific notices. While the
notice of June 14, 2006, illustrated all
eligible non-BIA programs for DOI, this
notice is particular to the Fish and
Wildlife Service.
II. Existing AFAs between SelfGovernance Tribes and the Fish and
Wildlife Service
1. Council of Athabascan Tribal
Governments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. Confederated Salish and Kootenai
Tribes of the Flathead Reservation.
III. Eligible Non-BIA Programs of the
Service
Below is a listing of the types of nonBIA Service programs, or portions
thereof, that may be eligible for selfgovernance funding agreements because
they either are ‘‘otherwise available to
Indians’’ under Title I and not
precluded by any other law, or may
have ‘‘special geographic, historical, or
cultural significance’’ to a participating
tribe. The list represents the most
current information on programs
potentially available to tribes under a
self-governance AFA.
We will also consider for inclusion in
funding agreements other programs or
activities not included below, but
which, upon request of a selfgovernance tribe, we determine to be
eligible under either sections 403(b)(2)
or 403(c) of the Act. Tribes with an
interest in such potential agreements are
encouraged to begin such discussions.
Our mission is to conserve, protect,
and enhance fish, wildlife, and their
habitats for the continuing benefit of the
American people. Our primary
responsibilities are for migratory birds,
endangered species, freshwater and
anadromous fisheries, and certain
marine mammals. We also have a
continuing cooperative relationship
with a number of Indian tribes
throughout the National Wildlife Refuge
System and the Service’s fish
hatcheries. Any self-governance tribe
may contact a national wildlife refuge or
national fish hatchery directly
concerning participation in our
programs under the Act.
Some elements of the following
programs may be eligible for inclusion
in a self-governance AFA. We
developed the list below based on the
proximity of an identified selfgovernance tribe to a national park,
monument, preserve, or recreation area
and the types of programs that have
components that may be suitable for
contracting through a self-governance
AFA. This list is not all-inclusive, but
is representative of the types of Service
programs which may be eligible for
tribal participation through an AFA.
1. Subsistence Programs in the State
of Alaska.
2. Technical Assistance:
b. Habitat Surveys.
c. Sport Fish Restoration.
d. Capture of Depredating Migratory
Birds.
e. Program Planning.
f. Habitat Restoration Activities.
3. Endangered Species Programs:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13821
a. Cooperative Management of
Conservation Programs.
b. Development and Implementation
of Recovery Plans.
c. Conducting Status Surveys for High
Priority Candidate Species.
d. Participation in the Development of
Habitat Conservation Plans.
4. Education Programs:
a. Interpretation.
b. Outdoor Classrooms.
c. Visitor Center Operations.
d. Volunteer Coordination Efforts onand off-Refuge.
5. Environmental Contaminants
Program:
a. Analytical Devices.
b. Removal of Underground Storage
Tanks.
c. Specific Cleanup Activities.
d. Natural Resource Economic
Analysis.
e. Specific Field Data Gathering
Efforts.
6. Fish Hatchery Operations:
a. Egg Taking.
b. Rearing/Feeding.
c. Disease Treatment.
d. Tagging.
e. Clerical/Facility Maintenance.
7. Wetland and Habitat Conservation
and Restoration:
a. Construction.
b. Planning Activities.
c. Habitat Monitoring and
Management.
8. National Wildlife Refuge
Operations and Maintenance:
a. Construction.
b. Farming.
c. Concessions.
d. Maintenance.
e. Comprehensive Management
Planning.
f. Biological Program Efforts.
g. Habitat Management.
IV. Locations of Refuges and Hatcheries
With Close Proximity to SelfGovernance Tribes
1. Alaska National Wildlife Refuges,
Alaska.
2. Alchesay National Fish Hatchery,
Arizona.
3. Humboldt Bay National Wildlife
Refuge, Idaho.
4. Kootenai National Wildlife Refuge,
Idaho.
5. Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge,
Minnesota.
6. Mille Lacs National Wildlife Refuge,
Minnesota.
7. Rice Lake National Wildlife Refuge,
Minnesota.
8. National Bison Range, Montana.
9. Ninepipe National Wildlife Refuge,
Montana.
10. Pablo National Wildlife Refuge,
Montana.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
13822
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
11. Mescalero National Fish Hatchery,
New Mexico.
12. Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge,
Oklahoma.
13. Tishomingo National Wildlife
Refuge, Oklahoma.
14. Bandon Marsh National Wildlife
Refuge, Washington.
15. Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge,
Washington.
16. Makah National Fish Hatchery,
Washington.
17. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge,
Washington.
18. Quinalt National Fish Hatchery,
Washington.
19. San Juan Islands National Wildlife
Refuge, Washington.
V. Programmatic Targets
During Fiscal Year 2007, upon request
of a self-governance tribe, the Fish and
Wildlife Service will negotiate funding
agreements for its eligible programs
beyond those already negotiated.
Dated: March 6, 2007.
David Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–5343 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[NV–912–07–1220PA–006F]
Cancellation of the BLM Nevada
Resource Advisory Council Recreation
Subcommittee Meeting
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Cancellation of the BLM Nevada
Resource Advisory Council Recreation
Subcommittee Meeting.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The March 29, 2007, meeting
of the Bureau of Land Management’s
(BLM) Resource Advisory Councils
Recreation Subcommittee has been
cancelled.
DATE AND TIME: The Recreation
Subcommittee was scheduled to meet
Thursday, March 29, 2007, from 9 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. at the Bureau of Land
Management, Nevada State Office,
located at 1340 Financial Boulevard in
Reno, Nevada.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doran Sanchez, Chief, Office of
Communications (775) 861–6586, or
Barbara Keleher, Outdoor Recreation
Planner (775) 861–6628, at the BLM
Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial
Blvd., Reno, Nevada.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting announced by a notice at 72 FR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
9580 Mar. 2, 2007 is cancelled. The
public will be notified via Federal
Register Notice and news release when
the meeting is rescheduled.
Dated: March 12, 2007.
Ron Wenker,
Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State
Director.
[FR Doc. 07–1288 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of United States v.
MFS, INC., (A/K/A Mineral Fiber
Specialists), Civil Action No. 05–6656,
(E.D. PA.) Under the Clean Air Act
Notice is hereby given that on March
9, 2007 a proposed Consent Decree
United States v. MFS, Inc., (a/k/a
Mineral Fiber Specialists), Civil Action
No. 05–6656, (E.D. Pa.) was lodged with
the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
In this action the United States sought
injunctive relief and civil penalties
pursuant to Section 113(b) of the Clean
Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’) 42 U.S.C.
7413(b), for alleged violations by
Defendant MFS, Inc. of Section 112 of
the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412, and the
applicable requirements of 40 CFR part
63, subpart DDD. Defendant MFS, Inc.
owns and operates a mineral wool
production plant in the City of
Bethlehem, Northampton County,
Pennsylvania and is therefore subject to
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (‘‘NESHAP’’)
for mineral wool manufacturers codified
at 40 CFR part 63, subpart DDD
(‘‘Mineral Wool or MW NESHAP’’),
specifically §§ 63.1175–63.1196. The
Consent Decree requires the
performance of injunctive relief
including initial performance testing of
the MFS facility, stipulated penalties for
violations of Decree requirements and
the payment of a civil penalty to the
United States in the amount of
$109,000. The Decree authorizes MFS to
use an alternative test protocol set forth
in Appendix A to the Decree to
determine compliance with the
particulate matter (‘‘PM’’) emission
limits set forth in the Mineral Wool
NESHAP, set forth in 40 CFR subpart
DDD. If EPA determines that MFS has
not complied with the NESHAP, the
Decree requires MFS to further submit
a plan to achieve compliance with the
NESHAP subject to EPA review and
approval. The Decree provides for
stipulated penalties for noncompliance
with the Decree requirements.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
date of this publication comments
relating to the lodged Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, and should
refer to United States v. MFS, Inc.
(a/k/a Mineral Fiber Specialists), Civil
Action No. 05–6656 (E.D. Pa).
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
Attorney for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, and at U.S. EPA Region
III in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
During the public comment period, the
Decree may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Decree may also be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by
faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $9 (5 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward
a check in that amount to the Consent
Decree Library at the stated address.
Virginia Gibson,
Chief, Civil Division, United States Attorney’s
Office, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
[FR Doc. 07–1429 Filed 3–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances; Notice of Registration
By Notice dated November 28, 2006,
and published in the Federal Register
on December 7, 2006, (71 FR 70985),
Cayman Chemical Company, 1180 East
Ellsworth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan
48108, made application by renewal to
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk
manufacturer of the basic classes of
controlled substances listed in schedule
I:
Drug
Marihuana (7360) .........................
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) .....
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Schedule
I
I
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13820-13822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5343]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
List of Programs Eligible for Inclusion in Fiscal Year 2007
Funding Agreements With Self-Governance Tribes
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), publish this
notice to list programs or portions of our programs that are eligible
for inclusion in Fiscal Year 2007 funding agreements with self-
governance tribes, and to list programmatic targets pursuant to section
405(c)(4) of the Tribal Self-Governance Act.
DATES: This notice expires on September 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct any inquiries or comments about this notice to the
American Indian Liaison Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1849 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For questions regarding self-governance,
contact Patrick Durham, Native American Liaison, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; telephone, 202-208-
4133; fax 202-208-3524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title II of the Indian Self-Determination Act Amendments of 1994
(Pub. L. 103-413, the ``Tribal Self-Governance Act'' or the ``Act'')
instituted a permanent self-governance program at the Department of the
Interior (DOI). Under the self-governance program, certain programs,
services, functions, and activities, or portions thereof, in DOI
bureaus other than the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) are eligible to
be planned, conducted, consolidated, and administered by a self-
governance tribal government.
Under section 405(c) of the Act, the Secretary of the Interior is
required to publish annually: (1) A list of non-BIA programs, services,
functions, and activities, or portions thereof, that are eligible for
inclusion in agreements negotiated under the self-governance
[[Page 13821]]
program; and (2) programmatic targets for these bureaus.
Under the Act, two categories of non-BIA programs are eligible for
self-governance annual funding agreements (AFAs):
(1) Under section 403(b)(2) of the Act, any non-BIA program,
service, function or activity that is administered by DOI that is
``otherwise available to Indian tribes or Indians'' can be administered
by a tribal government through a self-governance AFA. The Department
interprets this provision to authorize the inclusion of programs
eligible for self-determination contracts under Title I of the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638, as
amended). Section 403(b)(2) also specifies: ``nothing in this
subsection may be construed to provide any tribe with a preference with
respect to the opportunity of the tribe to administer programs,
services, functions and activities, or portions thereof, unless such
preference is otherwise provided by law.''
(2) Under section 403(c) of the Act, the Secretary may include
other programs, services, functions, and activities or portions thereof
that are of ``special geographic, historical, or cultural
significance'' to a self-governance tribe.
Under section 403(k) of the Act, AFAs cannot include programs,
services, functions, or activities that are inherently Federal or where
the statute establishing the existing program does not authorize the
type of participation sought by the tribe. However, a tribe (or tribes)
need not be identified in the authorizing statutes in order for a
program or element to be included in a self-governance AFA. While
general legal and policy guidance regarding what constitutes an
inherently Federal function exists, we will determine whether a
specific function is inherently Federal on a case-by-case basis
considering the totality of circumstances.
The Office of Self-Governance requested comments on the proposed
list for all bureaus on June 14, 2006. A number of editorial and
technical changes were provided by Interior's bureaus and incorporated
into separate bureau-specific notices. While the notice of June 14,
2006, illustrated all eligible non-BIA programs for DOI, this notice is
particular to the Fish and Wildlife Service.
II. Existing AFAs between Self-Governance Tribes and the Fish and
Wildlife Service
1. Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments.
2. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead
Reservation.
III. Eligible Non-BIA Programs of the Service
Below is a listing of the types of non-BIA Service programs, or
portions thereof, that may be eligible for self-governance funding
agreements because they either are ``otherwise available to Indians''
under Title I and not precluded by any other law, or may have ``special
geographic, historical, or cultural significance'' to a participating
tribe. The list represents the most current information on programs
potentially available to tribes under a self-governance AFA.
We will also consider for inclusion in funding agreements other
programs or activities not included below, but which, upon request of a
self-governance tribe, we determine to be eligible under either
sections 403(b)(2) or 403(c) of the Act. Tribes with an interest in
such potential agreements are encouraged to begin such discussions.
Our mission is to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife,
and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
Our primary responsibilities are for migratory birds, endangered
species, freshwater and anadromous fisheries, and certain marine
mammals. We also have a continuing cooperative relationship with a
number of Indian tribes throughout the National Wildlife Refuge System
and the Service's fish hatcheries. Any self-governance tribe may
contact a national wildlife refuge or national fish hatchery directly
concerning participation in our programs under the Act.
Some elements of the following programs may be eligible for
inclusion in a self-governance AFA. We developed the list below based
on the proximity of an identified self-governance tribe to a national
park, monument, preserve, or recreation area and the types of programs
that have components that may be suitable for contracting through a
self-governance AFA. This list is not all-inclusive, but is
representative of the types of Service programs which may be eligible
for tribal participation through an AFA.
1. Subsistence Programs in the State of Alaska.
2. Technical Assistance:
b. Habitat Surveys.
c. Sport Fish Restoration.
d. Capture of Depredating Migratory Birds.
e. Program Planning.
f. Habitat Restoration Activities.
3. Endangered Species Programs:
a. Cooperative Management of Conservation Programs.
b. Development and Implementation of Recovery Plans.
c. Conducting Status Surveys for High Priority Candidate Species.
d. Participation in the Development of Habitat Conservation Plans.
4. Education Programs:
a. Interpretation.
b. Outdoor Classrooms.
c. Visitor Center Operations.
d. Volunteer Coordination Efforts on- and off-Refuge.
5. Environmental Contaminants Program:
a. Analytical Devices.
b. Removal of Underground Storage Tanks.
c. Specific Cleanup Activities.
d. Natural Resource Economic Analysis.
e. Specific Field Data Gathering Efforts.
6. Fish Hatchery Operations:
a. Egg Taking.
b. Rearing/Feeding.
c. Disease Treatment.
d. Tagging.
e. Clerical/Facility Maintenance.
7. Wetland and Habitat Conservation and Restoration:
a. Construction.
b. Planning Activities.
c. Habitat Monitoring and Management.
8. National Wildlife Refuge Operations and Maintenance:
a. Construction.
b. Farming.
c. Concessions.
d. Maintenance.
e. Comprehensive Management Planning.
f. Biological Program Efforts.
g. Habitat Management.
IV. Locations of Refuges and Hatcheries With Close Proximity to Self-
Governance Tribes
1. Alaska National Wildlife Refuges, Alaska.
2. Alchesay National Fish Hatchery, Arizona.
3. Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Idaho.
4. Kootenai National Wildlife Refuge, Idaho.
5. Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota.
6. Mille Lacs National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota.
7. Rice Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Minnesota.
8. National Bison Range, Montana.
9. Ninepipe National Wildlife Refuge, Montana.
10. Pablo National Wildlife Refuge, Montana.
[[Page 13822]]
11. Mescalero National Fish Hatchery, New Mexico.
12. Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma.
13. Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma.
14. Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, Washington.
15. Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge, Washington.
16. Makah National Fish Hatchery, Washington.
17. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge, Washington.
18. Quinalt National Fish Hatchery, Washington.
19. San Juan Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Washington.
V. Programmatic Targets
During Fiscal Year 2007, upon request of a self-governance tribe,
the Fish and Wildlife Service will negotiate funding agreements for its
eligible programs beyond those already negotiated.
Dated: March 6, 2007.
David Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-5343 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P