Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Delaware River, Delaware City, DE, 13221-13224 [E7-5144]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
15:14 Mar 20, 2007
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded that there are no
factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine parade permit
are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
38°20′15″ N, longitude 075°04′38″ W,
thence northerly along the shoreline to
the point of origin. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Ocean City
Maryland Offshore Challenge under the
auspices of the Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and
approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Hampton Roads.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must stop the vessel
immediately when directed to do so by
any Official Patrol and then proceed
only as directed.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
(4) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on June 16 and 17, 2007.
Dated: March 9, 2007.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–5142 Filed 3–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
13221
Jkt 211001
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–016
to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 100.35–T05–016
City, MD.
Coast Guard
Atlantic Ocean, Ocean
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established for the waters of the
Atlantic Ocean bounded by a line drawn
from a position along the shoreline near
Ocean City, MD at latitude 38°22′01″ N,
longitude 075°03′56″ W, thence easterly
to latitude 38°21′50″ N, longitude
075°03′28″ W, thence southwesterly to
latitude 38°20′10″ N, longitude
075°04′08″ W, thence westerly to a
position near the shoreline at latitude
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–07–020]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Delaware River, Delaware City,
DE
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
13222
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish temporary special local
regulations during the ‘‘7th Annual
Escape from Fort Delaware Triathlon’’,
an event to be held June 9, 2007 on the
waters of Delaware River at Delaware
City, DE. These special local regulations
are necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the
event. This action is intended to
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a
portion of the Delaware River during the
7th Annual Escape from Fort Delaware
Triathlon.
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
April 20, 2007.
DATES:
You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 415 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, fax
them to (757) 391–8149, or e-mail them
to Dennis.M.Sens@uscg.mil. The
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
ADDRESSES:
D.
M. Sens, Project Manager, Compliance
and Inspection Branch, at (757) 398–
6204.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–07–020),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Mar 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On June 9, 2007, the Escape from Fort
Delaware Triathlon, Inc. will sponsor
the ‘‘7th Annual Escape from Fort
Delaware Triathlon’’. The swimming
segment of the event will consist of
approximately 500 swimmers
competing across a one mile course
along the Delaware River between Pea
Patch Island and Delaware City,
Delaware. The competition will begin at
Pea Patch Island. The participants will
swim across to the finish line located at
the Delaware City Wharf, swimming
approximately one mile, across
Bulkhead Shoal Channel.
Approximately 20 support vessels will
accompany the swimmers. Due to the
need for vessel control during the
swimming event, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area to provide for the safety of
participants, support craft and other
transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of the Delaware River
between Fort Delaware on Pea Patch
Island and the Delaware City Wharf at
Delaware City, Delaware. The temporary
special local regulations will be in effect
from 5:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on June 9,
2007. The effect will be to restrict
general navigation in the regulated area
during the event. Except for persons or
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area. Vessel traffic may be allowed to
transit the regulated area at slow speed
as the swim progresses, when the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander determines it
is safe to do so. The Patrol Commander
will notify the public of specific
enforcement times by Marine Radio
Safety Broadcast. These regulations are
needed to control vessel traffic during
the event to enhance the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation
restricts vessel traffic from transiting a
portion of the Delaware River during the
event, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulated area will be
in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the
maritime community via marine
information broadcasts, area
newspapers and radio stations so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
this section of the Delaware River
during the event.
This proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will be
in effect for only a short period, from
5:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on June 9, 2007.
Vessels desiring to transit the event area
will be able to transit the regulated area
at slow speed as the swim progresses,
when the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander determines it is safe to do
so. Before the enforcement period, we
will issue maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
the address listed under ADDRESSES. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This proposed rule calls for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
15:14 Mar 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13223
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded that there are no
factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine event permit
are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under those
sections.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add temporary § 100.35–T05–020
to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
13224
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
§ 100.35–T05–020, Delaware River,
Delaware City, DE.
The Committee will meet on
Thursday, April 5, 2007, beginning at 3
p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Ft. Mason Officers’ Club, Building 1,
Upper Fort Mason, San Francisco, CA.
Written comments may be sent to:
Superintendent, GGNRA, Ft. Mason,
Bldg. 201, San Francisco, CA 94123,
Attn: Negotiated Rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Project information line at 415–561–
4728, or go to the Web site at
www.parkplanning.nps.gov/goga and
select Negotiated Rulemaking for Dog
Management at GGNRA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Committee was established pursuant to
the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990
(5 U.S.C. 561–570) to consider
developing a special regulation for dog
walking at GGNRA. Although the
Committee may modify its agenda
during the course of its work, the
proposed agenda for this meeting is as
follows: Introductions, approval of the
meeting summary for the previous
meeting, updates since the previous
meeting, update on the concurrent
NEPA process, report from the
Technical Subcommittee on progress to
date, next steps, public comment.
The Committee meeting is open to the
public and opportunity will be provided
for public comment during the meeting.
To request a sign language interpreter,
lease call the park TDD line (415) 556–
2766, at lease a week in advance of the
meeting. Please note that federal
regulations prohibit pets in public
buildings, with the exception of service
animals.
DATES:
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
includes all waters of the Delaware
River within 500 yards either side of a
line drawn southwesterly from a point
near the shoreline at Pea Patch Island,
at latitude 39°35′08″ N, 075°34′18″ W,
thence to latitude 39°34′43.6’’ N,
075°35′13″ W, a position located near
the Delaware City Wharf, Delaware City,
DE. All coordinates reference Datum
NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions:
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander
means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations:
(1) Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 5:30 a.m. to 10:30
a.m. on June 9, 2007.
Dated: March 9, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–5144 Filed 3–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Dated: March 2, 2007.
Bernard C. Fagan,
Acting Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 07–1371 Filed 3–20–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BILLING CODE 4312–FN–M
National Park Service
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
36 CFR Chapter I
National Park Service
Meeting of Negotiated Rulemaking
Advisory Committee for Dog
Management at Golden Gate National
Recreation Area
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1,
10), notice is hereby given of the sixth
meeting of the Negotiated Rulemaking
Advisory Committee for Dog
Management at Golden Gate National
Recreation Area (GGNRA).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Mar 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024–AD40
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System, National Capital
Region
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) proposes to add a regulation
governing parking violations. The
addition is needed to address situations
in which the vehicle’s operator is absent
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
when the vehicle is illegally parked.
The proposed amendment provides that
a parking citation is subject to fine,
allows the citation to name the
registered owner if the operator is not
present, and creates a rebuttable prima
facie presumption that the registered
owner of the illegally parked vehicle
was the person who committed the
violation. This proposed rule is similar
to provisions in the parking laws of the
District of Columbia, Virginia, and
Maryland.
Comments must be received by
May 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the number RIN 1024–
AD40, by any of the following methods:
—Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
—E-mail Sean Doyle, Park Ranger,
National Park Service at
Sean_Doyle@nps.gov. Use RIN 1024–
AD40 in the subject line.
—Mail or hand delivery to Sean Doyle,
Park Ranger, National Park Service
National Capital Region, 1100 Ohio
Drive SW., Room 236, Washington,
DC 20242.
—Fax to: (202) 260–9582.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Lee, Special Assistant, 1849 C
St., NW., Room 3319, Washington, DC
20240, jennifer_lee@nps.gov, 202–219–
1689.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Parking violations on Federal
parkland administered by the NPS in
the National Capital Region are
regulated by 36 CFR 4.12 (traffic control
devices). This section provides that
‘‘Failure to comply with the directions
of a traffic control device is prohibited
unless otherwise directed by the
superintendent.’’ Prohibitions included
within 36 CFR 4.12 are violations of
handicapped parking signs, no parking,
parking times limitations, and parking
outside of marked parking spaces. This
regulation is routinely used by United
States Park Police officers and National
Park Service law enforcement
commissioned rangers. When a citation
is issued and the operator is not
identified on the notice, it results in the
violation being dismissed if the
registered owner fails to appear at trial
and the court declines to proceed.
Parking spaces on parkland are
limited in number and are intended to
provide visitors with safe, convenient,
and legal areas to park while they visit
the parks. In urbanized areas of parks in
the National Capital Region, violation
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 21, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13221-13224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-07-020]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Delaware River,
Delaware City, DE
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13222]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations during the ``7th Annual Escape from Fort Delaware
Triathlon'', an event to be held June 9, 2007 on the waters of Delaware
River at Delaware City, DE. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the event. This action is intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Delaware River during the 7th Annual Escape
from Fort Delaware Triathlon.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before April 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, hand-deliver them to Room 415 at the same address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, fax them to (757) 391-8149, or e-mail them to
Dennis.M.Sens@uscg.mil. The Inspections and Investigations Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or
copying at the above address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. M. Sens, Project Manager,
Compliance and Inspection Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-07-
020), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the address listed under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On June 9, 2007, the Escape from Fort Delaware Triathlon, Inc. will
sponsor the ``7th Annual Escape from Fort Delaware Triathlon''. The
swimming segment of the event will consist of approximately 500
swimmers competing across a one mile course along the Delaware River
between Pea Patch Island and Delaware City, Delaware. The competition
will begin at Pea Patch Island. The participants will swim across to
the finish line located at the Delaware City Wharf, swimming
approximately one mile, across Bulkhead Shoal Channel. Approximately 20
support vessels will accompany the swimmers. Due to the need for vessel
control during the swimming event, the Coast Guard will temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in the event area to provide for the safety of
participants, support craft and other transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the Delaware River between Fort
Delaware on Pea Patch Island and the Delaware City Wharf at Delaware
City, Delaware. The temporary special local regulations will be in
effect from 5:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on June 9, 2007. The effect will be
to restrict general navigation in the regulated area during the event.
Except for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated
area. Vessel traffic may be allowed to transit the regulated area at
slow speed as the swim progresses, when the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander determines it is safe to do so. The Patrol Commander will
notify the public of specific enforcement times by Marine Radio Safety
Broadcast. These regulations are needed to control vessel traffic
during the event to enhance the safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation restricts vessel traffic from
transiting a portion of the Delaware River during the event, the effect
of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited duration
that the regulated area will be in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the maritime community via marine
information broadcasts, area newspapers and radio stations so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule will affect the following entities, some
of which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit this section of the Delaware River during the
event.
This proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect for only a short period, from 5:30 a.m. to 10:30
a.m. on June 9, 2007. Vessels desiring to transit the event area will
be able to transit the regulated area at slow speed as the swim
progresses, when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines it is safe
to do so. Before the enforcement period, we will issue maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
[[Page 13223]]
and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This proposed rule calls for no new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine event permit are specifically
excluded from further analysis and documentation under those sections.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-020 to read as follows:
[[Page 13224]]
Sec. 100.35-T05-020, Delaware River, Delaware City, DE.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area includes all waters of the
Delaware River within 500 yards either side of a line drawn
southwesterly from a point near the shoreline at Pea Patch Island, at
latitude 39[deg]35'08'' N, 075[deg]34'18'' W, thence to latitude
39[deg]34'43.6'' N, 075[deg]35'13'' W, a position located near the
Delaware City Wharf, Delaware City, DE. All coordinates reference Datum
NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions:
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations:
(1) Except for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 5:30
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on June 9, 2007.
Dated: March 9, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-5144 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P