Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 12786-12787 [E7-4989]

Download as PDF 12786 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Coyote Business Park Project Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision (ROD). Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension March 13, 2007. This notice announces the availability of the ROD to implement BPA’s portion of the Proposed Action identified in the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs’ (BIA) Coyote Business Park Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS–0371, September 2006). BPA will remove and replace some existing wood transmission line structures with taller steel poles on BPA’s portion of its Roundup-LaGrande 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line that crosses the proposed Coyote Business Park on the Umatilla Indian Reservation in Oregon. ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD and EIS may be obtained by calling BPA’s tollfree document request line, 1–800–622– 4520. The ROD and EIS Summary are also available on our Web site, https:// www.efw.bpa.gov. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Lynard, Bonneville Power Administration—KEC–4, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon 97208–3621; toll-free telephone number 1–800–282–3713; fax number 503–230–5699; or e-mail gplynard@bpa.gov. BPA owns and operates the 230-kV RoundupLaGrande transmission line that crosses the proposed Coyote Business Park site. The portion of the transmission line that crosses the business park site is supported by 12 wooden ‘‘H-frame’’ structures, each about 60 feet tall. The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) has requested that BPA remove these structures and replace them with single steel poles about 110 feet tall. Taller steel poles will increase the clearance between the ground and the conductors and reduce the footprint of the line, thus expanding CTUIR’s options for future parking and transportation needs. BPA has decided to remove and replace these structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Issued in Portland, Oregon, on March 5, 2007. Stephen J. Wright, Administrator and Chief Executive Officer. [FR Doc. E7–4913 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Mar 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described below. DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due May 22, 2007. ADDRESSES: Copies of sample filings of the proposed collection of information can be obtained from the Commission’s Web site (https://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/eforms.asp#549b) or from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Attn: Michael Miller, Office of the Executive Director, ED–34, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments may be filed either in paper format or electronically. Those parties filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For paper filing, the original and 14 copies of such comments should be submitted to the Secretary of the Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 and refer to Docket No. IC07–549B–000. Documents filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format. To file the document, access the Commission’s Web site at https:// www.ferc.gov and click on ‘‘Make an eFiling’’ and then follow the instructions for each screen. First time users will have to establish a user name and password. The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgement to the sender’s e-mail address upon receipt of comments. All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the Internet through FERC’s homepage using the eLibrary link. For user assistance, contact FERConlinesupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at (866) 208–3676 or for TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The information collected under the requirements of FERC–549B ‘‘Gas Pipeline Rates: Capacity Information’’ (OMB Control No. 1902–0169) includes both the Index of Customers Report under 18 CFR 284.13(c) and capacity reporting requirements under 18 CFR 284.13(b) and 284.13(d). This information is used by the Commission to implement the statutory provisions of sections 4, 5, and 16 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), 15 U.S.C. 717c0717o, Pub. L. 75–688, 52 Stat. 822 and 830 and Title III of the NGPA, 15 U.S.C. 3301–3432, Pub. L. 95–621. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [Docket No. IC07–549B–000; FERC–549B] AGENCY: ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES telephone at (202) 502–8415, by fax at (202) 273–0873, and by e-mail at michael.miller@ferc.gov. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Capacity Reports On April 4, 1992 in Order No. 636, the Commission established a capacity release mechanism under which shippers could release firm transportation and storage capacity on either a short or long term basis to other shippers wanting to obtain capacity. Pipelines posted available firm and interruptible capacity information on their electronic bulletin boards (EBBs) to inform potential shippers. On September 11, 1992, in Order No. 636A, the Commission determined, through staff audits, that the efficiency of the capacity release mechanism could be enhanced by standardizing the content and format of capacity release information and the methods by which shippers access this information, posted to EBBs. On April 4, 1995 through Order No. 577 (RM95–5–000), the Commission amended § 284.243(h) of its regulations to allow shippers the ability to release capacity without having to comply with the Commission’s advance posting and bidding requirements. To create greater substitution between different forms of capacity and to enhance competition across the pipeline grid, on February 25, 2000 in Order No. 637, the Commission revised its capacity release regulations regarding scheduling, segmentation and flexible receipt point rights, penalties, and reporting requirements. This resulted in more reliable capacity information and price data being available that shippers needed to make informed decisions in a competitive market as well as to improve shipper’s and the Commission’s availability to monitor marketplace behavior. Index of Customers In Order No. 581 issued September 28, 1995 the Commission established E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1 12787 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices the Index of Customers (IOC) information requirement. The Index of Customers had two functions, first, for annualizing capacity held on pipelines and second, for providing capacity information to the market. The Index of Customers information aids the capacity release system by enabling shippers to identify and locate those holding capacity rights that shippers may want to acquire. The information was required to be posted on the pipeline’s EBB and filed on electronic media with the Commission. The first Index contained, for all firm customers under contract as of the first day of the calendar quarter, the full legal name of the shipper, the rate schedule number for which service is contracted, the contract effective and expiration dates, and contract quantities. In Order No. 637, the Commission required the following additional information: the receipt and delivery points held under contract as of the first day of the calendar quarter, the full legal name of the shipper, the rate schedule for which the capacity is held; the common transaction point codes; the contract number; a shipper identification number, such as DUNS; an indication whether the contract includes negotiated rates; the names of any agents or asset managers that control capacity in a pipeline rate zone; and any affiliate relationship between the pipeline and the holder of capacity. The Index is now provided through a quarterly filing on electronic media to the Commission and is posted on pipelines’ Internet Web sites. Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of data. Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated as: Number of responses per respondent (2) Number of respondents annually (1) Average burden hours per response (3) 6 4 291 3 179,838 1,236 ........................ ........................ 181,704 Capacity Reports &. IOC: 103 ...................................................................................................................................... ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES Total ...................................................................................................................................... Estimated cost burden to respondents is as follows: Capacity Reports: 179,838 hours/2080 work hours per year × $122,137 = $10,560,038; Index of Customers (IOC): 1,236 hours/ 2080 work hours per year × $122,137 = $72,578; Total Costs = $102,632,616. The estimated annual cost per respondent is: Capacity Reports = $ 102,525; Index of Customers = $ 705. The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining, disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; (4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5) searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of information; (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the information; and (8) requesting e.g. waiver or clarification of requirements. The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost for VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Mar 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs apply to activities, which benefit the whole organization rather than any one particular function or activity. Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses. Philis J. Posey, Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. E7–4989 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Total annual burden hours DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP07–23–001] Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing March 13, 2007. Take notice that on March 6, 2007, Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC (Algonquin) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission’s order issued February 27, 2007, in Docket No. CP07–23–000. Algonquin states that copies of the filing have been served upon all affected customers of Algonquin and interested state commissions and all parties on the official service list in the abovecaptioned proceeding. Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12786-12787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC07-549B-000; FERC-549B]


Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed 
Collection; Comment Request; Extension

March 13, 2007.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a) 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public comment 
on the specific aspects of the information collection described below.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due May 22, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Copies of sample filings of the proposed collection of 
information can be obtained from the Commission's Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/eforms.asp#549b) or from the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, Attn: Michael Miller, Office of the Executive 
Director, ED-34, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments 
may be filed either in paper format or electronically. Those parties 
filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For paper 
filing, the original and 14 copies of such comments should be submitted 
to the Secretary of the Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 and refer to 
Docket No. IC07-549B-000.
    Documents filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in 
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format. To 
file the document, access the Commission's Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov and click on ``Make an e-Filing'' and then follow the 
instructions for each screen. First time users will have to establish a 
user name and password. The Commission will send an automatic 
acknowledgement to the sender's e-mail address upon receipt of 
comments.
    All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the 
Internet through FERC's homepage using the eLibrary link. For user 
assistance, contact FERConlinesupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at (866) 
208-3676 or for TTY, contact (202)
    502-8659.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by 
telephone at (202) 502-8415, by fax at (202) 273-0873, and by e-mail at 
michael.miller@ferc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the 
requirements of FERC-549B ``Gas Pipeline Rates: Capacity Information'' 
(OMB Control No. 1902-0169) includes both the Index of Customers Report 
under 18 CFR 284.13(c) and capacity reporting requirements under 18 CFR 
284.13(b) and 284.13(d). This information is used by the Commission to 
implement the statutory provisions of sections 4, 5, and 16 of the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA), 15 U.S.C. 717c0717o, Pub. L. 75-688, 52 Stat. 
822 and 830 and Title III of the NGPA, 15 U.S.C. 3301-3432, Pub. L. 95-
621.

Capacity Reports

    On April 4, 1992 in Order No. 636, the Commission established a 
capacity release mechanism under which shippers could release firm 
transportation and storage capacity on either a short or long term 
basis to other shippers wanting to obtain capacity. Pipelines posted 
available firm and interruptible capacity information on their 
electronic bulletin boards (EBBs) to inform potential shippers. On 
September 11, 1992, in Order No. 636A, the Commission determined, 
through staff audits, that the efficiency of the capacity release 
mechanism could be enhanced by standardizing the content and format of 
capacity release information and the methods by which shippers access 
this information, posted to EBBs.
    On April 4, 1995 through Order No. 577 (RM95-5-000), the Commission 
amended Sec.  284.243(h) of its regulations to allow shippers the 
ability to release capacity without having to comply with the 
Commission's advance posting and bidding requirements.
    To create greater substitution between different forms of capacity 
and to enhance competition across the pipeline grid, on February 25, 
2000 in Order No. 637, the Commission revised its capacity release 
regulations regarding scheduling, segmentation and flexible receipt 
point rights, penalties, and reporting requirements. This resulted in 
more reliable capacity information and price data being available that 
shippers needed to make informed decisions in a competitive market as 
well as to improve shipper's and the Commission's availability to 
monitor marketplace behavior.

Index of Customers

    In Order No. 581 issued September 28, 1995 the Commission 
established

[[Page 12787]]

the Index of Customers (IOC) information requirement. The Index of 
Customers had two functions, first, for annualizing capacity held on 
pipelines and second, for providing capacity information to the market. 
The Index of Customers information aids the capacity release system by 
enabling shippers to identify and locate those holding capacity rights 
that shippers may want to acquire. The information was required to be 
posted on the pipeline's EBB and filed on electronic media with the 
Commission. The first Index contained, for all firm customers under 
contract as of the first day of the calendar quarter, the full legal 
name of the shipper, the rate schedule number for which service is 
contracted, the contract effective and expiration dates, and contract 
quantities.
    In Order No. 637, the Commission required the following additional 
information: the receipt and delivery points held under contract as of 
the first day of the calendar quarter, the full legal name of the 
shipper, the rate schedule for which the capacity is held; the common 
transaction point codes; the contract number; a shipper identification 
number, such as DUNS; an indication whether the contract includes 
negotiated rates; the names of any agents or asset managers that 
control capacity in a pipeline rate zone; and any affiliate 
relationship between the pipeline and the holder of capacity. The Index 
is now provided through a quarterly filing on electronic media to the 
Commission and is posted on pipelines' Internet Web sites.
    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the 
current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of 
data.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is 
estimated as:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
                                                                   responses per  Average burden   Total annual
               Number of respondents annually  (1)                  respondent       hours per     burden hours
                                                                        (2)        response  (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capacity Reports &..............................................
IOC: 103........................................................               6             291         179,838
                                                                               4               3           1,236
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................  ..............  ..............         181,704
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated cost burden to respondents is as follows:

Capacity Reports: 179,838 hours/2080 work hours per year x $122,137 = 
$10,560,038;
Index of Customers (IOC): 1,236 hours/2080 work hours per year x 
$122,137 = $72,578;
Total Costs = $102,632,616.

    The estimated annual cost per respondent is:

Capacity Reports = $ 102,525;
Index of Customers = $ 705.

    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial 
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide 
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing, 
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the 
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining, 
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways 
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; 
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5) 
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of 
information; (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the information; 
and (8) requesting e.g. waiver or clarification of requirements.
    The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for 
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect 
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to 
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost 
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs 
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs 
apply to activities, which benefit the whole organization rather than 
any one particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology e.g. permitting electronic submission of 
responses.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4989 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.