Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; St. Mary's River, St. Mary's City, MD, 12742-12743 [E7-4936]
Download as PDF
12742
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Enforcement period. (1) This
section will be enforced from 5 a.m. to
6 p.m. on days when the following
events are held:
(i) Safety at Sea Seminar, held on the
fourth Saturday in March;
(ii) Naval Academy Crew Races held
on the last weekend in March and every
weekend in April and May;
(iii) Blue Angels Air Show, held on
the fourth Tuesday and Wednesday in
May.
(2) Should the event’s daily activities
conclude prior to 6 p.m., enforcement of
this section may be terminated for that
day at the discretion of the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.
(3) The Commander, Fifth Coast
Guard District will publish a notice in
the Fifth Coast Guard District Local
Notice to Mariners announcing the
specific event dates and times. Notice
will also be made via marine Safety
Radio Broadcast on VHF–FM marine
band radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
Dated: March 8, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–4938 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–07–004]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; St. Mary’s River, St. Mary’s
City, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
temporarily changing the enforcement
period for the ‘‘St. Mary’s Seahawk
Sprint’’ held annually on the waters of
the St. Mary’s River, near St. Mary’s
City, Maryland. This special local
regulation is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the St. Mary’s River
and is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during
the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on April 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket (CGD05–07–
004) and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Mar 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis M. Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 12, 2007, we published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; St.
Mary’s River, St. Mary’s City, MD in the
Federal Register (72 FR 6510). We
received no letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
On April 21, 2007, St. Mary’s College
of Maryland will sponsor the ‘‘Seahawk
Sprint’’ crew races on the waters of the
St. Mary’s River. The event will consist
of intercollegiate crew rowing teams
racing along a 2000 meter course on the
waters of the St. Mary’s River. A fleet of
spectator vessels is expected to gather
near the event site to view the
competition. The regulation at 33 CFR
100.527 is effective annually for the St.
Mary’s College crew races marine event.
Paragraph (d) of Section 100.527
establishes the enforcement date for the
St. Mary’s Seahawk crew races. This
regulation temporarily changes the
enforcement date from the second
Saturday in April to the third Saturday
in April, holding the marine event on
April 21, 2007. St. Mary’s College crew
club who is the sponsor for this event
intends to hold this event annually;
however, they have changed the date of
the event for 2007 so that it is outside
the scope of the existing enforcement
period. To provide for the safety of
participants, spectators, support and
transiting vessels, the Coast Guard is
temporarily restricting vessel traffic in
the event area during the crew races.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did not receive
comments in response to the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
published in the Federal Register.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard is
establishing temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the St.
Mary’s River, St. Mary’s City, Maryland.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. The effect of this
action merely establishes the date on
which the existing regulation would be
in effect and would not impose any new
restrictions on vessel traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule would effect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the St. Mary’s River during
the event.
This rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule would
merely change the date on which the
existing regulations would be enforced
in the regulated area and would not
impose any new restrictions on vessel
traffic.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the address
listed under ADDRESSES. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Mar 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12743
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine event permit
are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
I
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. In § 100.527, from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on April 21, 2007, suspend paragraph
(d).
I
3. In § 100.527, from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on April 21, 2007, add a new paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
I
§ 100.527 St. Mary’s River, St. Mary’s City,
Maryland.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on April 21, 2007. A notice of
enforcement of this section will be
disseminated through the Fifth Coast
Guard District Local Notice to Mariners
announcing the specific event date and
times. Notice will also be made via
marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio channel 22
(157.1 MHz).
Dated: March 8, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–4936 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM
19MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12742-12743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4936]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-07-004]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; St. Mary's River,
St. Mary's City, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the enforcement period
for the ``St. Mary's Seahawk Sprint'' held annually on the waters of
the St. Mary's River, near St. Mary's City, Maryland. This special
local regulation is intended to restrict vessel traffic in portions of
the St. Mary's River and is necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on April 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket (CGD05-07-004) and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District,
431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004, between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis M. Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 12, 2007, we published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; St. Mary's
River, St. Mary's City, MD in the Federal Register (72 FR 6510). We
received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
On April 21, 2007, St. Mary's College of Maryland will sponsor the
``Seahawk Sprint'' crew races on the waters of the St. Mary's River.
The event will consist of intercollegiate crew rowing teams racing
along a 2000 meter course on the waters of the St. Mary's River. A
fleet of spectator vessels is expected to gather near the event site to
view the competition. The regulation at 33 CFR 100.527 is effective
annually for the St. Mary's College crew races marine event. Paragraph
(d) of Section 100.527 establishes the enforcement date for the St.
Mary's Seahawk crew races. This regulation temporarily changes the
enforcement date from the second Saturday in April to the third
Saturday in April, holding the marine event on April 21, 2007. St.
Mary's College crew club who is the sponsor for this event intends to
hold this event annually; however, they have changed the date of the
event for 2007 so that it is outside the scope of the existing
enforcement period. To provide for the safety of participants,
spectators, support and transiting vessels, the Coast Guard is
temporarily restricting vessel traffic in the event area during the
crew races.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did not receive comments in response to the Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard is establishing temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the St. Mary's River, St. Mary's
City, Maryland.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. The effect of this action merely establishes the
date on which the existing regulation would be in effect and would not
impose any new restrictions on vessel traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule would effect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the St. Mary's River
during the event.
This rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule would merely change the date on which the existing regulations
would be enforced in the regulated area and would not impose any new
restrictions on vessel traffic.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
[[Page 12743]]
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine event permit are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. In Sec. 100.527, from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on April 21, 2007, suspend
paragraph (d).
0
3. In Sec. 100.527, from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on April 21, 2007, add a new
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 100.527 St. Mary's River, St. Mary's City, Maryland.
* * * * *
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on April 21, 2007. A notice of enforcement of this section
will be disseminated through the Fifth Coast Guard District Local
Notice to Mariners announcing the specific event date and times. Notice
will also be made via marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine
band radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
Dated: March 8, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-4936 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P