Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200PF, and -200CB Series Airplanes, 12125-12127 [E7-4742]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 50 / Thursday, March 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the agency provides assignment rights
under this part by:
(1) Determining the representative
rate of positions not covered by a pay
band consistent with § 351.203;
(2) Determining the representative
rate of each pay band, or competitive
level within the pay band(s), consistent
with § 351.203;
(3) As determined by the agency,
providing assignment rights under
paragraph (b) of this section (bumping),
or paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section
(retreating), consistent with the grade
intervals covered in paragraphs (b)(2)
and (c)(2) of this section, and the pay
band intervals in paragraph (h) of this
section.
[FR Doc. E7–4701 Filed 3–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27560; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–211–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 757–200, –200PF, and –200CB
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 757–200, –200PF,
and –200CB series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require inspections
to detect scribe lines and cracks of the
fuselage skin, lap joints, circumferential
butt splice strap, and external and
internal approved repairs; and related
investigative/corrective actions if
necessary. This proposed AD results
from reports of scribe lines adjacent to
the skin lap joints. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct cracks,
which could grow and cause rapid
decompression of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:19 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Stremick, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6450; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2007–27560; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–211–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12125
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received reports of scribe
lines found adjacent to the skin lap
joints on Model 757–200 airplanes. The
scribe lines appear to have been made
on the skin when sealant was removed
as part of preparation of the airplane for
repainting. The airplanes had between
13,300 and 16,800 flight cycles.
Although no cracks as a result of scribe
lines have been reported on Model 757
airplanes, scribe lines have caused
cracks on other airplanes. Undetected
cracking, if not corrected, could grow
and result in rapid decompression.
Related AD
This proposed AD is similar to AD
2006–07–12, amendment 39–14539 (71
FR 16211), March 31, 2006. That AD
applies to all Boeing Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500
series airplanes. That AD requires a onetime inspection for scribe lines and
cracks in the fuselage skin at certain lap
joints, butt joints, external repair
doublers, and other areas; and related
investigative/corrective actions if
necessary. That AD resulted from
reports of fuselage skin cracks adjacent
to the skin lap joints on airplanes that
had scribe lines.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–53A0092, Revision
1, dated January 10, 2007. The service
bulletin describes procedures for
removing paint and sealant at the
applicable zonal locations, and doing
detailed inspections to detect scribe
lines and cracks of the fuselage skin, lap
joints, circumferential butt splice strap,
and external and internal approved
repairs. The service bulletin specifies
repairing scribe lines before further
flight, except when a limited return to
service (LRTS) program for qualifying
scribe lines would allow return to
service for a limited period before scribe
lines are repaired.
The LRTS program includes repetitive
inspections to detect cracks where
scribe lines were found. To qualify for
an LRTS program, a scribe line must
meet certain criteria including the total
flight cycles on the airplane, and the
location and extent of the scribe lines.
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
12126
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 50 / Thursday, March 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The service bulletin specifies contacting
Boeing for final repair instructions for
the LRTS program, which would
eliminate the need for the repetitive
inspections of the LRTS program. The
repetitive intervals for the LRTS
program range from 1,500 to 8,000 flight
cycles, depending on the location of the
scribe lines and the configuration of the
airplane.
Each piece of structure susceptible to
a scribe line is assigned to a zone. Based
on criticality of location, the service
bulletin addresses the most critical areas
(zones) first and appropriately reduces
the compliance requirements for less
critical areas. The service bulletin has
specific instructions for calculating
separate inspection thresholds. These
thresholds are based on (1) fatigue life
for the identified zonal locations and (2)
potential scribe line opportunities in an
airplane’s maintenance history. The
compliance times for inspecting are
20,000 flight cycles (Zone 1) and 30,000
flight cycles (Zone 2) after the first
scribe opportunity. If a maintenance
records-based threshold program is not
used, however, the service bulletin
specifies 6,000 flight cycles as the first
scribe opportunity. Since a scribe line
can occur at any time during the service
life of an airplane and at many
locations, the service bulletin uses both
total flight cycles and structural
criticality of locations to determine the
inspection requirements.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed below.
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and Service Information
The service bulletin specifies to
contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would
require repairing those conditions by
using a method that we approve, or by
using data that meet the certification
basis of the airplane, and that have been
approved by an Authorized
Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation
Option Authorization Organization
whom we have authorized to make
those findings.
The service bulletin specifies
compliance times relative to the date of
issuance of the service bulletin;
however, this proposed AD would
require compliance before the specified
compliance time relative to the effective
date of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 945 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet;
of these, about 634 are U.S.-registered
airplanes. The following table provides
the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD. There
are no U.S.-registered airplanes in
Group 5 or Group 6.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Inspections
Group
Group
Group
Group
1
2
3
4
Work hours
................................................................................
................................................................................
................................................................................
................................................................................
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:19 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
Average labor
rate per hour
127
122
154
128
$80
80
80
80
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Number of
U.S.-registered
airplanes
Cost per
airplane
$10,160
9,760
12,320
10,240
144
6
75
409
Fleet cost
$1,463,040
58,560
924,000
4,188,160
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2007–27560;
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–211–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by April 30, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 50 / Thursday, March 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757–
200, –200PF, and –200CB series airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0092,
Revision 1, dated January 10, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of scribe
lines adjacent to the fuselage skin lap joints.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracks, which could grow and cause rapid
decompression of the airplane.
Compliance
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1,
2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–4742 Filed 3–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Inspections
Federal Aviation Administration
(f) Perform detailed inspections to detect
scribe lines and cracks of the fuselage skin,
lap joints, circumferential butt splice strap,
and external and internal approved repairs;
and perform related investigative and
corrective actions. Do the actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–53A0092, Revision 1, dated January 10,
2007, except as required by paragraph (g) of
this AD. Do the actions within the applicable
compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E.
of the service bulletin, except as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
14 CFR Part 39
Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(g) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–53A0092, Revision 1, dated January 10,
2007, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate repair instructions, repair using
a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD.
(h) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–
53A0092, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2007,
specifies compliance times relative to the
date of issuance of the service bulletin;
however, this proposed AD would require
compliance before the specified compliance
time relative to the effective date of the AD.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Credit for Prior Accomplishment
(i) Inspections done before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0092, dated
September 18, 2006, are acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:19 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27565; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–215–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330 and A340–200 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain
Airbus Model A330–200, A330–300,
A340–200, and A340–300 series
airplanes; and Model A340–541 and
–642 airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitively resetting
the display units (DUs) for the
electronic instrument system (EIS),
either by switching them off and back
on again or by performing a complete
electrical shutdown of the airplane. This
proposed AD would require installing
new software, which would end the
actions required by the existing AD.
This proposed AD also would add
additional airplanes that may be placed
on the U.S. Register in the future. This
proposed AD results from an incident in
which all of the DUs for the EIS went
blank simultaneously during flight. We
are proposing this AD to prevent
automatic reset of the DUs for the EIS
during flight and consequent loss of
data from the DUs, which could reduce
the ability of the flightcrew to control
the airplane during adverse flight
conditions.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 16, 2007.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12127
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
for service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2797; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2007–27565;
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–215–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12125-12127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4742]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-27560; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-211-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200, -200PF, and -
200CB Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 757-200, -200PF, and -200CB series airplanes.
This proposed AD would require inspections to detect scribe lines and
cracks of the fuselage skin, lap joints, circumferential butt splice
strap, and external and internal approved repairs; and related
investigative/corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD results
from reports of scribe lines adjacent to the skin lap joints. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct cracks, which could grow and
cause rapid decompression of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Stremick, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6450; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2007-
27560; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-211-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
We have received reports of scribe lines found adjacent to the skin
lap joints on Model 757-200 airplanes. The scribe lines appear to have
been made on the skin when sealant was removed as part of preparation
of the airplane for repainting. The airplanes had between 13,300 and
16,800 flight cycles. Although no cracks as a result of scribe lines
have been reported on Model 757 airplanes, scribe lines have caused
cracks on other airplanes. Undetected cracking, if not corrected, could
grow and result in rapid decompression.
Related AD
This proposed AD is similar to AD 2006-07-12, amendment 39-14539
(71 FR 16211), March 31, 2006. That AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-
100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. That AD
requires a one-time inspection for scribe lines and cracks in the
fuselage skin at certain lap joints, butt joints, external repair
doublers, and other areas; and related investigative/corrective actions
if necessary. That AD resulted from reports of fuselage skin cracks
adjacent to the skin lap joints on airplanes that had scribe lines.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0092,
Revision 1, dated January 10, 2007. The service bulletin describes
procedures for removing paint and sealant at the applicable zonal
locations, and doing detailed inspections to detect scribe lines and
cracks of the fuselage skin, lap joints, circumferential butt splice
strap, and external and internal approved repairs. The service bulletin
specifies repairing scribe lines before further flight, except when a
limited return to service (LRTS) program for qualifying scribe lines
would allow return to service for a limited period before scribe lines
are repaired.
The LRTS program includes repetitive inspections to detect cracks
where scribe lines were found. To qualify for an LRTS program, a scribe
line must meet certain criteria including the total flight cycles on
the airplane, and the location and extent of the scribe lines.
[[Page 12126]]
The service bulletin specifies contacting Boeing for final repair
instructions for the LRTS program, which would eliminate the need for
the repetitive inspections of the LRTS program. The repetitive
intervals for the LRTS program range from 1,500 to 8,000 flight cycles,
depending on the location of the scribe lines and the configuration of
the airplane.
Each piece of structure susceptible to a scribe line is assigned to
a zone. Based on criticality of location, the service bulletin
addresses the most critical areas (zones) first and appropriately
reduces the compliance requirements for less critical areas. The
service bulletin has specific instructions for calculating separate
inspection thresholds. These thresholds are based on (1) fatigue life
for the identified zonal locations and (2) potential scribe line
opportunities in an airplane's maintenance history. The compliance
times for inspecting are 20,000 flight cycles (Zone 1) and 30,000
flight cycles (Zone 2) after the first scribe opportunity. If a
maintenance records-based threshold program is not used, however, the
service bulletin specifies 6,000 flight cycles as the first scribe
opportunity. Since a scribe line can occur at any time during the
service life of an airplane and at many locations, the service bulletin
uses both total flight cycles and structural criticality of locations
to determine the inspection requirements.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed below.
Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Information
The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions by using a method that we
approve, or by using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization whom we have authorized to make those findings.
The service bulletin specifies compliance times relative to the
date of issuance of the service bulletin; however, this proposed AD
would require compliance before the specified compliance time relative
to the effective date of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 945 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet; of these, about 634 are U.S.-registered airplanes. The
following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD. There are no U.S.-registered airplanes in
Group 5 or Group 6.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of U.S.-
Inspections Work hours Average labor Cost per registered Fleet cost
rate per hour airplane airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group 1......................... 127 $80 $10,160 144 $1,463,040
Group 2......................... 122 80 9,760 6 58,560
Group 3......................... 154 80 12,320 75 924,000
Group 4......................... 128 80 10,240 409 4,188,160
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-27560; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-
211-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by April 30,
2007.
[[Page 12127]]
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757-200, -200PF, and -200CB
series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0092, Revision 1, dated January
10, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of scribe lines adjacent to the
fuselage skin lap joints. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracks, which could grow and cause rapid decompression of
the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections
(f) Perform detailed inspections to detect scribe lines and
cracks of the fuselage skin, lap joints, circumferential butt splice
strap, and external and internal approved repairs; and perform
related investigative and corrective actions. Do the actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757-53A0092, Revision 1, dated January 10, 2007,
except as required by paragraph (g) of this AD. Do the actions
within the applicable compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E.
of the service bulletin, except as required by paragraph (h) of this
AD.
Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(g) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0092, Revision 1,
dated January 10, 2007, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
repair instructions, repair using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(h) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0092, Revision 1, dated
January 10, 2007, specifies compliance times relative to the date of
issuance of the service bulletin; however, this proposed AD would
require compliance before the specified compliance time relative to
the effective date of the AD.
Credit for Prior Accomplishment
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0092, dated
September 18, 2006, are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-4742 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P