Environmental Impact Statement for the California High Speed Train System From Los Angeles to Orange County, CA, 12250-12252 [E7-4710]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
12250
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 50 / Thursday, March 15, 2007 / Notices
per day. The relocation of the northsouth mainline will require the
construction of a new corridor
approximately 10 to 13 miles in length
depending on the alignment alternative.
The east-west corridor may be
approximately 8 to 9 miles in length.
The relocation of the railroad corridors
would eliminate at least 47 grade
crossings. The relocated rail corridors
would be entirely grade separated.
The numerous grade crossings with
high vehicle traffic volumes within the
city limits require the CSXT trains to
reduce speed as they pass through
Vincennes. Two CSXT mainlines cross
in the middle of the city, and trains that
switch between mainlines move slowly,
creating traffic backups, emergency
vehicle delays, and delays in rail
operations. Frequently, train movements
literally cut the city in half. In addition,
the large volumes of trains and
vehicular traffic crossing the railroad
corridor increase the probability of
collisions at the crossings.
Cooperating Agencies: The Federal
Railroad Administration has agreed to
serve as a cooperating agency. No others
have been yet identified for this project.
Environmental Issues: Possible
environmental impacts include
displacement of commercial and
residential properties, increased noise
in some areas, decreased noise in other
areas, effects to historical properties or
archaeological sites, viewshed impacts,
impacts to water resources, wetlands,
farmed wetlands, prime farmland,
sensitive biological species and habitat,
land use compatibility impacts, and
impacts to agricultural lands.
Alternatives: The EIS will consider
alternatives that include: (1) Taking no
action; (2) rail relocation and
reconstruction of railroad line(s) and
grade separations on new location.
Scoping and Comment: FHWA
encourages broad participation in the
EIS process and review of the resulting
environmental documents. A scoping
meeting will be conducted in the City of
Vincennes area at a date and place,
which will be widely publicized well in
advance of the meeting. Comments,
questions, and suggestions related to the
project and potential environmental
concerns are invited from all interested
agencies and the public at large to
ensure that the full range of issues
related to the proposed action and all
reasonable alternatives are considered
and all significant issues are identified.
These comments, questions, and
suggestions should be forwarded to the
address listed above. The public is
invited to participate in the scoping
process as well. Notices of availability
for the Draft EIS, Final EIS, and Record
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
of Decision will be provided through
direct mail, the Federal Register and
other media. Notification also will be
sent to Federal, State, local agencies,
persons, and organizations that submit
comments or questions. Precise
schedules and locations for public
meetings will be announced in the local
news media. Interested individuals and
organizations may request to be
included on the mailing list for the
distribution of meeting announcements
and associated information.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 20.205, Highway Planning and
Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal
programs and activities apply to the
program).
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 23 CFR 771.123;
49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: March 9, 2007.
Robert F. Tally, P.E.,
Division Administrator, Indianapolis,
Indiana.
[FR Doc. E7–4725 Filed 3–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the California High Speed Train
System From Los Angeles to Orange
County, CA
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to
advise the public that FRA and the
California High Speed Rail Authority
(Authority) will jointly prepare a project
level Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and project level Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the section of
the Authority’s proposed California
High-Speed Train (HST) System from
the City of Los Angeles (Union Station)
to Orange County (Anaheim) in
compliance with relevant State and
federal laws, in particular the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA).
FRA is issuing this notice to solicit
public and agency input into the
development of the scope of the EIS and
to advise the public that outreach
activities conducted by the Authority
and its representatives will be
considered in the preparation of the
combined EIR/EIS. The Authority and
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FRA completed a Program EIR/EIS for
the California HST System in 2005 as
the first-phase of a tiered environmental
review process for the proposed
California HST System. The Authority
certified the Final Program EIR and
issued a decision, and FRA issued a
Record of Decision in November 2005
on the Final Program EIS, selecting the
HST Alternative for further project level
environmental review and selecting
corridor alignments and potential
station locations, including a corridor
between Los Angeles and Orange
County. The preparation of this project
level Los Angeles-Orange County HST
EIR/EIS will involve development of
preliminary engineering designs and
assessment of environmental effects
associated with the construction,
operation, and maintenance of the HST
system, including track, ancillary
facilities and stations, along the
previously selected Los Angeles-Orange
County corridor.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the Los Angeles-Orange County HST
EIR/EIS should be provided to the
Authority by April 24, 2007. Public
scoping meetings are scheduled from
April 5–April 12, 2007, as noted below.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
scope should be sent to Mr. Dan Leavitt,
Deputy Director, ATTN. Los Angeles—
Orange County, California High-Speed
Rail Authority, 925 L Street, Suite 1425,
Sacramento, CA 95814, or via e-mail
with the subject line ‘‘Los AngelesOrange County HST’’ to:
comments@hsr.ca.gov. Comments may
also be provided orally or in writing at
the scoping meetings scheduled at the
following locations:
• Union Station/METRO (Los
Angeles), METRO Board Room, One
Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012,
on April 5, 2007, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
and from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
• Anaheim, Gordon Hoyt Conference
Room, City Hall West, 201 S. Anaheim
Boulevard, Anaheim, CA on April 11,
2007, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. and from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m..
• Norwalk, Arts & Sports Complex
Community Meeting Center (Sproul
Room), 13000 Clarkdale Avenue,
Norwalk, CA 90651 on April 12, 2007,
from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. and from 6 p.m.
to 8 p.m..
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Valenstein, Environmental
Program Manager, Office of Railroad
Development, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue
(Mail Stop 20), Washington, DC 20590;
Telephone (202) 493–6368, or Mr.
Leavitt at the above noted address.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 50 / Thursday, March 15, 2007 / Notices
The
California High-Speed Rail Authority
(Authority) was established in 1996 and
is authorized and directed by statute to
undertake the planning for the
development of a proposed statewide
HST network that is fully coordinated
with other public transportation
services. The Legislature has granted the
Authority the powers necessary to
oversee the construction and operation
of a statewide HST network once
financing is secured. As part of the
Authority’s efforts to implement a highspeed train system, the Authority
adopted a Final Business Plan in June
2000, which reviewed the economic
feasibility of a 700-mile long HST
system capable of speeds in excess of
200 miles per hour on a dedicated, fully
grade-separated state-of-the art track.
The FRA has responsibility for
oversight of the safety of railroad
operations, including the safety of any
proposed high-speed ground
transportation system. For the proposed
HST, it is anticipated that FRA would
need to take certain regulatory actions
prior to operation.
In 2005, the Authority and FRA
completed a Final Program EIR/EIS for
the Proposed California High-Speed
Train System (statewide program EIR/
EIS), as the first-phase of a tiered
environmental review process. The
Authority certified the Final Program
EIR under CEQA and approved the
proposed HST System, and FRA issued
a Record of Decision under NEPA on the
Final Program EIS. This statewide
program EIR/EIS established the
purpose and need for the HST system,
analyzed a HST alternative, and
compared it with a No Project/No
Action Alternative and a Modal
Alternative. In approving the statewide
program EIR/EIS, the Authority and
FRA selected the HST Alternative and
selected certain corridors/general
alignments and general station
locations, incorporated mitigation
strategies and design practices, and
specified further measures to guide the
development of the HST System at the
site-specific project level of
environmental review to avoid and
minimize potential adverse
environmental impacts.
The Los Angeles-Orange County HST
EIR/EIS will be developed as a secondtier, site-specific environmental
document. It is one of a number of
second-tier environmental reviews for
sections of the HST system that FRA
and the Authority intend to undertake.
It will be tiered from and incorporate by
reference the certified statewide
program EIR/EIS in accordance with
Council on Environmental Quality
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
(CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1508.28) and
State CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
§ 15168[b]). Tiering will ensure that the
Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/
EIS builds upon all previous work
prepared for and incorporated in the
statewide program EIR/EIS. The EIR/EIS
will be carried out in accordance with
FRA’s Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts (64 FR 28545
[May 26, 1999]) and will address not
only NEPA and CEQA, but other
applicable statutes, regulations and
executive orders, including the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments, Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act, the Endangered
Species Act, and Executive Order 12898
on Environmental Justice. This EIR/EIS
process will also continue the NEPA/
Clean Water Act Section 404 merger
process established through the
statewide program EIR/EIS process.
The Los Angeles-Orange County HST
EIR/EIS and other project level EIR/EISs
will examine a range of project
alternatives for portions of the proposed
HST system within corridors selected in
the statewide program EIR/EIS, as well
as a no action alternative. This and
other project level EIR/EISs will fully
describe site-specific environmental
impacts and will identify specific
mitigation measures to address those
impacts and will incorporate design
practices to avoid and minimize
potential adverse environmental
impacts. The FRA and the Authority
will assess the site characteristics, size,
nature, and timing of proposed sitespecific projects to determine whether
the impacts are potentially significant
and whether impacts can be avoided or
mitigated. This and other project EIR/
EISs will identify and evaluate
reasonable and feasible site-specific
alignment alternatives, evaluate the
impacts from construction, operation,
and maintenance of the HST system,
and identify mitigation measures.
Information and documents regarding
the HST environmental review process
will be made available through the
Authority’s Internet site: https://
www.cahighspeedrail.gov/.
Purpose and Need: The need for a
HST system is directly related to the
expected growth in population, and
increases in intercity travel demand in
California over the next twenty years
and beyond. With growth in travel
demand, there will be an increase in
travel delays arising from the growing
congestion on California’s highways and
at airports. In addition, there will be
negative effects on the economy, quality
of life, and air quality in and around
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12251
California’s metropolitan areas from a
transportation system that will become
less reliable as travel demand increases.
The intercity highway system,
commercial airports, and conventional
passenger rail serving the intercity
travel market are currently operating at
or near capacity, and will require large
public investments for maintenance and
expansion to meet existing demand and
future growth. The purpose of the
proposed HST system is to provide a
new mode of high-speed intercity travel
that would link the major metropolitan
areas of the state; interface with
international airports, mass transit, and
highways; and provide added capacity
to meet increases in intercity travel
demand in California in a manner
sensitive to and protective of
California’s unique natural resources.
Alternatives: The Los Angeles-Orange
County HST EIR/EIS will consider a No
Action or No Project Alternative and
HST Alternatives for the Los Angeles to
Orange County corridor.
No Action Alternative: The take no
action (No Project or No Build)
alternative is defined to serve as the
baseline for assessment of the HST
Alternative. The No Build Alternative
represents the region’s transportation
system (highway, air, and conventional
rail) as it existed in 2006, and as it
would exist after completion of
programs or projects currently planned
for funding and implementation by
2030. The No Build Alternative defines
the existing and future intercity
transportation system for the Los
Angeles to Orange County corridor
based on programmed and funded
improvements to the intercity
transportation system through 2030,
according to the following sources of
information: State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), Regional
Transportation Plans (RTPs) for all
modes of travel, airport plans, and
intercity passenger rail plans.
HST Alternative: The Authority
proposes to construct, operate and
maintain an electric-powered steelwheel-on-steel-rail HST system, over
700-mile long (1,126-kilometer long),
capable of speeds in excess of 200 miles
per hour (mph) (320 kilometers per hour
[km/h]) on dedicated, fully gradeseparated tracks, with state-of-the-art
safety, signaling, and automated train
control systems. The Los Angeles to
Orange County corridor that was
selected by the Authority and FRA with
the statewide program EIR/EIS follows
the existing BNSF/Metrolink rail
corridor (also known as the LOSSAN
Corridor) from Los Angeles Union
Station as far south as Irvine. The Los
Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
12252
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 50 / Thursday, March 15, 2007 / Notices
will consider HST service from Los
Angeles to Anaheim. The HST system
can provide service to Orange County
with a terminus in Anaheim. Beyond
Anaheim right-of-way is constrained
and environmental conditions are
different. HST service beyond Anaheim
to Irvine may be considered separately
in the future.
Further engineering studies to be
undertaken as a part of this EIR/EIS
process will examine and refine
alignments in the selected corridor,
including the alignment option
identified in the statewide program EIR/
EIS that shares tracks with other
passenger services separated from
freight trains with 4 total tracks (2 for
passenger rail service and 2 for freight
service) between Los Angeles and
Fullerton and 2 total tracks with
additional passing tracks South of
Fullerton. With this alignment option,
the electrified HST would share tracks
(at reduced speeds) with non-electric
Metrolink commuter rail, Amtrak
Surfliner intercity services and
occasional freight trains (there are fewer
freight operations south of Fullerton).
This alignment option is based on the
premise that the capacity and
compatibility issues associated with the
shared operations with existing nonelectric service (Surfliners, Metrolink,
and freight) can be resolved. Additional
alignment options will be considered
that involve dedicated HST tracks that
may be exclusive to HST service or that
may also accommodate Metrolink
express services.
Station location options were selected
by the Authority and FRA with the
statewide program EIR/EIS considering
travel time, train speed, cost, local
access times, potential connections with
other modes of transportation, ridership
potential, and the distribution of
population and major destinations along
the route, and local planning
constraints/conditions. Alternative
station sites at the selected general
station locations will be identified and
evaluated in this project level EIR/EIS.
Station area development policies to
encourage transit-friendly development
near and around HST stations that
would have the potential to promote
higher density, mixed-use, pedestrianoriented development will be prepared
in coordination with local and regional
planning agencies. Potential station
locations to be evaluated in the Los
Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS
include: City of Los Angeles-Union
Station; City of Norwalk-Norwalk
Transportation Center; and City of
Anaheim-Anaheim Regional
Transportation Intermodal Center
(ARTIC). In addition, potential sites for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Mar 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
turnback/layover train storage facilities
and a main HST repair and heavy
maintenance facility will be evaluated
in the Los Angeles-Orange County HST
EIR/EIS.
Probable Effects: The purpose of the
EIR/EIS process is to explore in a public
setting the effects of the proposed
project on the physical, human, and
natural environment. The FRA and the
Authority will continue the tiered
evaluation of all significant
environmental, social, and economic
impacts of the construction and
operation of the HST system. Impact
areas to be addressed include:
Transportation impacts; safety and
security; land use and zoning;
secondary development; land
acquisition, displacements, and
relocations; cultural resource impacts,
including impacts on historical and
archaeological resources and parklands/
recreation areas; neighborhood
compatibility and environmental
justice; natural resource impacts
including air quality, wetlands, water
resources, noise, vibration, energy,
wildlife and ecosystems, including
endangered species. Measures to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate all adverse
impacts will be identified and
evaluated.
Scoping and Comments: FRA
encourages broad participation in the
EIS process during scoping and review
of the resulting environmental
documents. Comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested agencies
and the public at large to insure the full
range of issues related to the proposed
action and all reasonable alternatives
are addressed and all significant issues
are identified. In particular, FRA is
interested in determining whether there
are areas of environmental concern
where there might be a potential for
significant impacts identifiable at a
project level. Public agencies with
jurisdiction are requested to advise FRA
and the Authority of the applicable
permit and environmental review
requirements of each agency, and the
scope and content of the environmental
information that is germane to the
agency’s statutory responsibilities in
connection with the proposed project.
Public agencies are requested to advise
FRA if they anticipate taking a major
action in connection with the proposed
project and if they wish to cooperate in
the preparation of the project level EIR/
EIS. Public scoping meetings have been
scheduled as an important component
of the scoping process for both the State
and Federal environmental review. The
scoping meetings described in this
Notice will also be advertised locally
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and included in additional public
notification.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 9,
2007.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Railroad
Development.
[FR Doc. E7–4710 Filed 3–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the California High Speed Train
System from Palmdale to Los Angeles,
CA
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT) .
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to
advise the public that FRA and the
California High Speed Rail Authority
(Authority) will jointly prepare a project
level Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and project level Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the section of
the Authority’s proposed California
High-Speed Train (HST) System from
the City of Palmdale to the City of Los
Angeles in compliance with relevant
State and federal laws, in particular the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA).
FRA is issuing this notice to solicit
public and agency input into the
development of the scope of the EIS and
to advise the public that outreach
activities conducted by the Authority
and its representatives will be
considered in the preparation of the
combined EIR/EIS. The Authority and
FRA completed a Program EIR/EIS for
the California HST System in 2005 as
the first-phase of a tiered environmental
review process for the proposed
California HST System. The Authority
certified the Final Program EIR and
issued a decision, and FRA issued a
Record of Decision in November 2005
on the Final Program EIS, selecting the
HST Alternative for further project level
environmental review and selecting
corridor alignments and potential
station locations, including a corridor
between Palmdale and Los Angeles. The
preparation of this project level
Palmdale-Los Angeles HST EIR/EIS will
involve development of preliminary
engineering designs and assessment of
environmental effects associated with
the construction, operation and
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 50 (Thursday, March 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12250-12252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the California High Speed
Train System From Los Angeles to Orange County, CA
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that FRA and
the California High Speed Rail Authority (Authority) will jointly
prepare a project level Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and
project level Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the section of the
Authority's proposed California High-Speed Train (HST) System from the
City of Los Angeles (Union Station) to Orange County (Anaheim) in
compliance with relevant State and federal laws, in particular the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
FRA is issuing this notice to solicit public and agency input into
the development of the scope of the EIS and to advise the public that
outreach activities conducted by the Authority and its representatives
will be considered in the preparation of the combined EIR/EIS. The
Authority and FRA completed a Program EIR/EIS for the California HST
System in 2005 as the first-phase of a tiered environmental review
process for the proposed California HST System. The Authority certified
the Final Program EIR and issued a decision, and FRA issued a Record of
Decision in November 2005 on the Final Program EIS, selecting the HST
Alternative for further project level environmental review and
selecting corridor alignments and potential station locations,
including a corridor between Los Angeles and Orange County. The
preparation of this project level Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS
will involve development of preliminary engineering designs and
assessment of environmental effects associated with the construction,
operation, and maintenance of the HST system, including track,
ancillary facilities and stations, along the previously selected Los
Angeles-Orange County corridor.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the Los Angeles-Orange County
HST EIR/EIS should be provided to the Authority by April 24, 2007.
Public scoping meetings are scheduled from April 5-April 12, 2007, as
noted below.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope should be sent to Mr. Dan
Leavitt, Deputy Director, ATTN. Los Angeles--Orange County, California
High-Speed Rail Authority, 925 L Street, Suite 1425, Sacramento, CA
95814, or via e-mail with the subject line ``Los Angeles-Orange County
HST'' to: comments@hsr.ca.gov. Comments may also be provided orally or
in writing at the scoping meetings scheduled at the following
locations:
Union Station/METRO (Los Angeles), METRO Board Room, One
Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, on April 5, 2007, from 3 p.m. to
5 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Anaheim, Gordon Hoyt Conference Room, City Hall West, 201
S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA on April 11, 2007, from 3 p.m. to 5
p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m..
Norwalk, Arts & Sports Complex Community Meeting Center
(Sproul Room), 13000 Clarkdale Avenue, Norwalk, CA 90651 on April 12,
2007, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m..
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Valenstein, Environmental
Program Manager, Office of Railroad Development, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue (Mail Stop 20), Washington, DC
20590; Telephone (202) 493-6368, or Mr. Leavitt at the above noted
address.
[[Page 12251]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The California High-Speed Rail Authority
(Authority) was established in 1996 and is authorized and directed by
statute to undertake the planning for the development of a proposed
statewide HST network that is fully coordinated with other public
transportation services. The Legislature has granted the Authority the
powers necessary to oversee the construction and operation of a
statewide HST network once financing is secured. As part of the
Authority's efforts to implement a high-speed train system, the
Authority adopted a Final Business Plan in June 2000, which reviewed
the economic feasibility of a 700-mile long HST system capable of
speeds in excess of 200 miles per hour on a dedicated, fully grade-
separated state-of-the art track.
The FRA has responsibility for oversight of the safety of railroad
operations, including the safety of any proposed high-speed ground
transportation system. For the proposed HST, it is anticipated that FRA
would need to take certain regulatory actions prior to operation.
In 2005, the Authority and FRA completed a Final Program EIR/EIS
for the Proposed California High-Speed Train System (statewide program
EIR/EIS), as the first-phase of a tiered environmental review process.
The Authority certified the Final Program EIR under CEQA and approved
the proposed HST System, and FRA issued a Record of Decision under NEPA
on the Final Program EIS. This statewide program EIR/EIS established
the purpose and need for the HST system, analyzed a HST alternative,
and compared it with a No Project/No Action Alternative and a Modal
Alternative. In approving the statewide program EIR/EIS, the Authority
and FRA selected the HST Alternative and selected certain corridors/
general alignments and general station locations, incorporated
mitigation strategies and design practices, and specified further
measures to guide the development of the HST System at the site-
specific project level of environmental review to avoid and minimize
potential adverse environmental impacts.
The Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS will be developed as a
second-tier, site-specific environmental document. It is one of a
number of second-tier environmental reviews for sections of the HST
system that FRA and the Authority intend to undertake. It will be
tiered from and incorporate by reference the certified statewide
program EIR/EIS in accordance with Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1508.28) and State CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
Sec. 15168[b]). Tiering will ensure that the Los Angeles-Orange County
HST EIR/EIS builds upon all previous work prepared for and incorporated
in the statewide program EIR/EIS. The EIR/EIS will be carried out in
accordance with FRA's Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts
(64 FR 28545 [May 26, 1999]) and will address not only NEPA and CEQA,
but other applicable statutes, regulations and executive orders,
including the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Section 4(f)
of the Department of Transportation Act, the Endangered Species Act,
and Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice. This EIR/EIS
process will also continue the NEPA/Clean Water Act Section 404 merger
process established through the statewide program EIR/EIS process.
The Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS and other project level
EIR/EISs will examine a range of project alternatives for portions of
the proposed HST system within corridors selected in the statewide
program EIR/EIS, as well as a no action alternative. This and other
project level EIR/EISs will fully describe site-specific environmental
impacts and will identify specific mitigation measures to address those
impacts and will incorporate design practices to avoid and minimize
potential adverse environmental impacts. The FRA and the Authority will
assess the site characteristics, size, nature, and timing of proposed
site-specific projects to determine whether the impacts are potentially
significant and whether impacts can be avoided or mitigated. This and
other project EIR/EISs will identify and evaluate reasonable and
feasible site-specific alignment alternatives, evaluate the impacts
from construction, operation, and maintenance of the HST system, and
identify mitigation measures. Information and documents regarding the
HST environmental review process will be made available through the
Authority's Internet site: https://www.cahighspeedrail.gov/.
Purpose and Need: The need for a HST system is directly related to
the expected growth in population, and increases in intercity travel
demand in California over the next twenty years and beyond. With growth
in travel demand, there will be an increase in travel delays arising
from the growing congestion on California's highways and at airports.
In addition, there will be negative effects on the economy, quality of
life, and air quality in and around California's metropolitan areas
from a transportation system that will become less reliable as travel
demand increases. The intercity highway system, commercial airports,
and conventional passenger rail serving the intercity travel market are
currently operating at or near capacity, and will require large public
investments for maintenance and expansion to meet existing demand and
future growth. The purpose of the proposed HST system is to provide a
new mode of high-speed intercity travel that would link the major
metropolitan areas of the state; interface with international airports,
mass transit, and highways; and provide added capacity to meet
increases in intercity travel demand in California in a manner
sensitive to and protective of California's unique natural resources.
Alternatives: The Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS will
consider a No Action or No Project Alternative and HST Alternatives for
the Los Angeles to Orange County corridor.
No Action Alternative: The take no action (No Project or No Build)
alternative is defined to serve as the baseline for assessment of the
HST Alternative. The No Build Alternative represents the region's
transportation system (highway, air, and conventional rail) as it
existed in 2006, and as it would exist after completion of programs or
projects currently planned for funding and implementation by 2030. The
No Build Alternative defines the existing and future intercity
transportation system for the Los Angeles to Orange County corridor
based on programmed and funded improvements to the intercity
transportation system through 2030, according to the following sources
of information: State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP),
Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) for all modes of travel, airport
plans, and intercity passenger rail plans.
HST Alternative: The Authority proposes to construct, operate and
maintain an electric-powered steel-wheel-on-steel-rail HST system, over
700-mile long (1,126-kilometer long), capable of speeds in excess of
200 miles per hour (mph) (320 kilometers per hour [km/h]) on dedicated,
fully grade-separated tracks, with state-of-the-art safety, signaling,
and automated train control systems. The Los Angeles to Orange County
corridor that was selected by the Authority and FRA with the statewide
program EIR/EIS follows the existing BNSF/Metrolink rail corridor (also
known as the LOSSAN Corridor) from Los Angeles Union Station as far
south as Irvine. The Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS
[[Page 12252]]
will consider HST service from Los Angeles to Anaheim. The HST system
can provide service to Orange County with a terminus in Anaheim. Beyond
Anaheim right-of-way is constrained and environmental conditions are
different. HST service beyond Anaheim to Irvine may be considered
separately in the future.
Further engineering studies to be undertaken as a part of this EIR/
EIS process will examine and refine alignments in the selected
corridor, including the alignment option identified in the statewide
program EIR/EIS that shares tracks with other passenger services
separated from freight trains with 4 total tracks (2 for passenger rail
service and 2 for freight service) between Los Angeles and Fullerton
and 2 total tracks with additional passing tracks South of Fullerton.
With this alignment option, the electrified HST would share tracks (at
reduced speeds) with non-electric Metrolink commuter rail, Amtrak
Surfliner intercity services and occasional freight trains (there are
fewer freight operations south of Fullerton). This alignment option is
based on the premise that the capacity and compatibility issues
associated with the shared operations with existing non-electric
service (Surfliners, Metrolink, and freight) can be resolved.
Additional alignment options will be considered that involve dedicated
HST tracks that may be exclusive to HST service or that may also
accommodate Metrolink express services.
Station location options were selected by the Authority and FRA
with the statewide program EIR/EIS considering travel time, train
speed, cost, local access times, potential connections with other modes
of transportation, ridership potential, and the distribution of
population and major destinations along the route, and local planning
constraints/conditions. Alternative station sites at the selected
general station locations will be identified and evaluated in this
project level EIR/EIS. Station area development policies to encourage
transit-friendly development near and around HST stations that would
have the potential to promote higher density, mixed-use, pedestrian-
oriented development will be prepared in coordination with local and
regional planning agencies. Potential station locations to be evaluated
in the Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS include: City of Los
Angeles-Union Station; City of Norwalk-Norwalk Transportation Center;
and City of Anaheim-Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center
(ARTIC). In addition, potential sites for turnback/layover train
storage facilities and a main HST repair and heavy maintenance facility
will be evaluated in the Los Angeles-Orange County HST EIR/EIS.
Probable Effects: The purpose of the EIR/EIS process is to explore
in a public setting the effects of the proposed project on the
physical, human, and natural environment. The FRA and the Authority
will continue the tiered evaluation of all significant environmental,
social, and economic impacts of the construction and operation of the
HST system. Impact areas to be addressed include: Transportation
impacts; safety and security; land use and zoning; secondary
development; land acquisition, displacements, and relocations; cultural
resource impacts, including impacts on historical and archaeological
resources and parklands/recreation areas; neighborhood compatibility
and environmental justice; natural resource impacts including air
quality, wetlands, water resources, noise, vibration, energy, wildlife
and ecosystems, including endangered species. Measures to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate all adverse impacts will be identified and
evaluated.
Scoping and Comments: FRA encourages broad participation in the EIS
process during scoping and review of the resulting environmental
documents. Comments and suggestions are invited from all interested
agencies and the public at large to insure the full range of issues
related to the proposed action and all reasonable alternatives are
addressed and all significant issues are identified. In particular, FRA
is interested in determining whether there are areas of environmental
concern where there might be a potential for significant impacts
identifiable at a project level. Public agencies with jurisdiction are
requested to advise FRA and the Authority of the applicable permit and
environmental review requirements of each agency, and the scope and
content of the environmental information that is germane to the
agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed
project. Public agencies are requested to advise FRA if they anticipate
taking a major action in connection with the proposed project and if
they wish to cooperate in the preparation of the project level EIR/EIS.
Public scoping meetings have been scheduled as an important component
of the scoping process for both the State and Federal environmental
review. The scoping meetings described in this Notice will also be
advertised locally and included in additional public notification.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 9, 2007.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Development.
[FR Doc. E7-4710 Filed 3-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P