Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision, 11928-11929 [E7-4634]
Download as PDF
11928
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices
‘‘Royal Portraits of Celebration’’,
imported from abroad for temporary
exhibition within the United States, are
of cultural significance. The objects are
imported pursuant to loan agreements
with the foreign owners or custodians.
I also determine that the exhibition or
display of the exhibit objects at the
National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian
Institution, Washington, DC, from on or
about April 27, 2007, until on or about
September 3, 2007, and at possible
additional venues yet to be determined,
is in the national interest. Public Notice
of these Determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
For Further Information Contact: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Paul
Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: (202) 453–8050). The
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700,
Washington, DC 20547–0001.
Dated: March 5, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E7–4660 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements
Filed the Week Ending March 2, 2007
The following Agreements were filed
with the Department of Transportation
under the Sections 412 and 414 of the
Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49
U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures
governing proceedings to enforce these
provisions. Answers may be filed within
21 days after the filing of the
application.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27396.
Date Filed: February 26, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
TC23 Middle East—TC3 Resolutions.
(Memo 0305)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East—TC3
Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27397.
Date Filed: February 26, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
TC23 Africa—TC3.
Areawide Resolutions (Memo 0314)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Mar 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Minutes: TC23 Middle East, Africa—
TC3 Passenger Tariff Coordinating
Conference (Memo 0321)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27424.
Date Filed: February 27, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
TC23 Middle East—South Asian
Subcontinent.
Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo
0309)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East—TC3
Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27425.
Date Filed: February 27, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
TC23 Middle East—South West Pacific.
Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo
0304)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East—TC3
Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27426.
Date Filed: February 27, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
TC23 Middle East—South West Pacific.
Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo
0304)
Minutes: TC32 Middle East—TC3
Resolutions (Memo 0317)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27450.
Date Filed: March 1, 2007.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject:
Resolution 015h.
USA Add-ons between USA and UK
(Memo 0202)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7–4636 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Applications for Certificates
of Public Convenience and Necessity
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed
Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)
During the Week Ending March 2, 2007
The following Applications for
Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Permits were filed under Subpart B
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department
of Transportation’s Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et.
seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to
Modify Scope are set forth below for
each application. Following the Answer
period DOT may process the application
by expedited procedures. Such
procedures may consist of the adoption
of a show-cause order, a tentative order,
or in appropriate cases a final order
without further proceedings.
Docket Number: OST–2007–27402.
Date Filed: February 26, 2007.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: March 19, 2007.
Description: Application of Porter
Airlines Inc. requesting and foreign air
carrier permit authorizing scheduled air
transportation of persons, property and
mail between a point or points in
Canada on the one hand, and a point or
points in the United States, on the other
hand.
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7–4637 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket Nos. FMCSA–00–7363, FMCSA–04–
17984, FMCSA–04–18885]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Renewals; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for 8 individuals. FMCSA
has statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
reviewed the comments submitted in
response to the previous announcement
and concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Dr.
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices
Qualifications Division, (202) 366–4001,
maggi.gunnels@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Document Management
System (DMS) at https://dmses.dot.gov.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on February 2,
2007.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received two comments in
these proceedings. The comments were
considered and discussed below.
Ms. Sachau believes that the approval
or renewal of vision exemptions make
the roads much more dangerous.
A review of each record for safety
while driving with the respective vision
deficiencies over the past two years
indicates each applicant continues to
meet the vision exemption standards.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered not only the medical reports
about the applicants’ vision, but also
their driving records and experience
with the vision deficiency. To qualify
for an exemption from the vision
standard, FMCSA requires a person to
present verifiable evidence that he or
she has driven a commercial vehicle
safely with the vision deficiency for 3
years. Recent driving performance is
especially important in evaluating
future safety, according to several
research studies designed to correlate
past and future driving performance.
Results of these studies support the
principle that the best predictor of
future performance by a driver is his/her
past record of crashes and traffic
violations. Copies of the studies may be
found at docket number FMCSA–98–
3637.
Advocates for Highway and Auto
Safety (Advocates) expressed opposition
to FMCSA’s policy to grant exemptions
from the FMCSR, including the driver
qualification standards. Specifically,
Advocates: (1) Objects to the manner in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Mar 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
which FMCSA presents driver
information to the public and makes
safety determinations; (2) objects to the
Agency’s reliance on conclusions drawn
from the vision waiver program; (3)
claims the Agency has misinterpreted
statutory language on the granting of
exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315); and finally (4) suggests that a
1999 Supreme Court decision affects the
legal validity of vision exemptions.
The issues raised by Advocates were
addressed at length in 64 FR 51568
(September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962
(November 30, 1999), 64 FR 69586
(December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January
3, 2000), 65 FR 57230 (September 21,
2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001).
We will not address these points again
here, but refer interested parties to those
earlier discussions.
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 8 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for David D.
Bungori, Jr., David R. Cox, Timothy A.
DeFrange, Robert T. Hill, Francisco J.
Jimenez, Robert B. Schmitt, Rick N.
Ulrich, and Larry D. Wedekind.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: March 7, 2007.
Larry W. Minor,
Office Director, Bus and Truck Standards
Operations.
[FR Doc. E7–4634 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Product Development
Although not required, notice is
hereby given that the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) has received a
Notice of Product Development (NPD)
from the Union Pacific Railroad
Company (UP), pursuant to Title 49
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Section 236.913(d)(1) for Phases 1 and
2 of the development of a
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11929
Communications Based Train Control
(CBTC) system. A brief summary of the
NPD, including the party submitting it,
and the requisite docket number are as
follows.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
[Waiver Docket Number FRA–2007–27322]
UP submitted an NPD of its CBTC
system for Phases 1 and 2. The proposed
CBTC system is a safety-critical,
microprocessor-based system, designed
to provide the enforcement of
movement authorities and speed
restrictions for CBTC-equipped
locomotives, and provide the
locomotive engineer an assist function
to optimize train handling. Phase 1 of
the CBTC is a non-vital safety overlay
based on BNSF’s Electronic Train
Management System, previously
approved under Docket Number FRA–
2006–23687. Phase 2 of the CBTC
implements the functionality of Phase 1
using a vital onboard architecture.
Interested parties are invited to
review the notification and associated
documents at the following locations:
• Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for a simple
search on the DOT electronic docket
site; and/or
• DOT Central Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
All documents in the public docket
are also available for inspection and
copying on the Internet at the docket
facility’s Web site, https://dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477–78). The Statement may also be
found at https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 7,
2007.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E7–4581 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11928-11929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket Nos. FMCSA-00-7363, FMCSA-04-17984, FMCSA-04-18885]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations for 8 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to
exempt individuals from the vision requirement if the exemptions
granted will not compromise safety. The Agency has reviewed the
comments submitted in response to the previous announcement and
concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety
maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
[[Page 11929]]
Qualifications Division, (202) 366-4001, maggi.gunnels@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Document Management
System (DMS) at https://dmses.dot.gov.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. The comment
period ended on February 2, 2007.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received two comments in these proceedings. The comments were
considered and discussed below.
Ms. Sachau believes that the approval or renewal of vision
exemptions make the roads much more dangerous.
A review of each record for safety while driving with the
respective vision deficiencies over the past two years indicates each
applicant continues to meet the vision exemption standards. To evaluate
the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered not only the
medical reports about the applicants' vision, but also their driving
records and experience with the vision deficiency. To qualify for an
exemption from the vision standard, FMCSA requires a person to present
verifiable evidence that he or she has driven a commercial vehicle
safely with the vision deficiency for 3 years. Recent driving
performance is especially important in evaluating future safety,
according to several research studies designed to correlate past and
future driving performance. Results of these studies support the
principle that the best predictor of future performance by a driver is
his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations. Copies of the
studies may be found at docket number FMCSA-98-3637.
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) expressed
opposition to FMCSA's policy to grant exemptions from the FMCSR,
including the driver qualification standards. Specifically, Advocates:
(1) Objects to the manner in which FMCSA presents driver information to
the public and makes safety determinations; (2) objects to the Agency's
reliance on conclusions drawn from the vision waiver program; (3)
claims the Agency has misinterpreted statutory language on the granting
of exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315); and finally (4) suggests
that a 1999 Supreme Court decision affects the legal validity of vision
exemptions.
The issues raised by Advocates were addressed at length in 64 FR
51568 (September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962 (November 30, 1999), 64 FR
69586 (December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January 3, 2000), 65 FR 57230
(September 21, 2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001). We will not
address these points again here, but refer interested parties to those
earlier discussions.
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any adverse evidence on any of these
drivers that indicates that safety is being compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 8 renewal applications, FMCSA renews the Federal
vision exemptions for David D. Bungori, Jr., David R. Cox, Timothy A.
DeFrange, Robert T. Hill, Francisco J. Jimenez, Robert B. Schmitt, Rick
N. Ulrich, and Larry D. Wedekind.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each renewal
exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: March 7, 2007.
Larry W. Minor,
Office Director, Bus and Truck Standards Operations.
[FR Doc. E7-4634 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P