Submission for OMB Emergency Review; Comment Request, 11902-11903 [E7-4567]

Download as PDF 11902 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices natural condition; and (5) the area offers outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation. As part of the Wilderness Suitability Assessment, the parks solicited public input on the suitability of the subject area for designation as Wilderness: a press release was sent out on August 12, 2002 informing the public of the process with a description of the parcels, the criteria that need to be meet to merit inclusion, and an intitial September 27, 2002 closing date; in concert with the distribution of the press release, some 3,200 copies of the release were mailed to interested individuals and groups on the park’s General Management Plan mailing list. The public comment period was then extended to October 18, 2002. Dated: March 6, 2007. Daniel N. Wenk, Deputy Director. [FR Doc. 07–1181 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–69–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–597] In the Matter of Certain Bassinet Products; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 9, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Arm’s Reach Concepts, Inc. of Malibu, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain bassinet products by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,931,677 and Re. 39,136. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:37 Mar 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Joffre, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2550. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on March 8, 2007, ordered that: (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain bassinet products by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–2, 5, 10–14, 16, and 18–19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,931,677 and claims 1–2, 10, 15–16, 24, 29–31, and 48–49 of U.S. Patent No. Re. 39,136, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is—Arm’s Reach Concepts, Inc., 27162 Sea Vista Drive, Malibu, California 90625. (b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: Simplicity, Inc., 501 South Ninth Street, Reading, Pennsylvania 19602. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Erin Joffre, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 8, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–4656 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Emergency Review; Comment Request March 7, 2007. The Department of Labor has submitted the following (see below) information collection request (ICR), utilizing emergency review procedures, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (Pub.L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB approval has been requested by March 16, 2007. A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by accessing it on: E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1 cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Notices https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain, or by calling the Department of Labor Departmental Clearance Officer, Ira Mills, on 202–693–4122. Comments and questions about the ICR listed below should be submitted to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202–395–7316), and received prior to the requested OMB approval date. The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. Agency: Employment and Training Administration. Title: Evaluation of State Implementation of Section 303(k) of the Social Security Act. OMB Number: 1205–0NEW. Frequency: One-time Survey. Affected Public: State Government. Type of Response: Reporting. Number of Respondents: 53. Estimated Time Per Respondent: 2 hours. Total Burden Hours: 106. Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 0. Total Burden Cost (operating/ maintaining): 0. Description: The collection of this information is necessary to examine state implementation of section 303(k) of the Social Security Act (SSA) as to (1) status and effectiveness of state actions to meet the requirement of the law and operation guidance, and (2) whether the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) should recommend Congressional action to make revisions to the law. On August 9, 2004, Public Law (Pub.L.) 108–295, the ‘‘ State Unemployment Tax Act (SUTA) Dumping Prevention Act of 2004’’ (Act) VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Mar 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 was enacted which amended section 303(k) of the SSA by establishing a minimum nationwide standard for curbing a unemployment compensation tax rate manipulation schemes known as SUTA dumping. The Act requires the Secretary of Labor to conduct a study of state implementation and report to Congress by July 15, 2007 at section 2, F(b)(1). ETA now requests emergency approval to enable ETA’s contractor sufficient time to distribute, collect, and analyze the state survey results and incorporate them into the study findings before the July 15, 2007, statutorily mandated submission date for the Secretary’s report to Congress. The timing of the survey design and review request corresponds with the states’ implementation of the detection systems, which began after enactment of the Federal law. If the survey design and distribution predated the implementation of state detection systems, states would be unable to provide useful data on the status and effectiveness of state actions to meet the requirement(s) of the Federal law and operation guidance. Ira L. Mills, Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E7–4567 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–23–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of February 26 through March 2, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11903 have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11902-11903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4567]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Emergency Review; Comment Request

March 7, 2007.
    The Department of Labor has submitted the following (see below) 
information collection request (ICR), utilizing emergency review 
procedures, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(Pub.L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB approval has been requested 
by March 16, 2007. A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting 
documentation, may be obtained by accessing it on:

[[Page 11903]]

https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, or by calling the Department 
of Labor Departmental Clearance Officer, Ira Mills, on 202-693-4122.
    Comments and questions about the ICR listed below should be 
submitted to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: 
OMB Desk Officer for the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202-
395-7316), and received prior to the requested OMB approval date.
    The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in 
comments which:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submissions of responses.
    Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
    Title: Evaluation of State Implementation of Section 303(k) of the 
Social Security Act.
    OMB Number: 1205-0NEW.
    Frequency: One-time Survey.
    Affected Public: State Government.
    Type of Response: Reporting.
    Number of Respondents: 53.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 2 hours.
    Total Burden Hours: 106.
    Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 0.
    Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining): 0.
    Description: The collection of this information is necessary to 
examine state implementation of section 303(k) of the Social Security 
Act (SSA) as to (1) status and effectiveness of state actions to meet 
the requirement of the law and operation guidance, and (2) whether the 
Secretary of Labor (Secretary) should recommend Congressional action to 
make revisions to the law. On August 9, 2004, Public Law (Pub.L.) 108-
295, the `` State Unemployment Tax Act (SUTA) Dumping Prevention Act of 
2004'' (Act) was enacted which amended section 303(k) of the SSA by 
establishing a minimum nationwide standard for curbing a unemployment 
compensation tax rate manipulation schemes known as SUTA dumping. The 
Act requires the Secretary of Labor to conduct a study of state 
implementation and report to Congress by July 15, 2007 at section 2, 
F(b)(1). ETA now requests emergency approval to enable ETA's contractor 
sufficient time to distribute, collect, and analyze the state survey 
results and incorporate them into the study findings before the July 
15, 2007, statutorily mandated submission date for the Secretary's 
report to Congress. The timing of the survey design and review request 
corresponds with the states' implementation of the detection systems, 
which began after enactment of the Federal law. If the survey design 
and distribution predated the implementation of state detection 
systems, states would be unable to provide useful data on the status 
and effectiveness of state actions to meet the requirement(s) of the 
Federal law and operation guidance.

Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-4567 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.