Radio Broadcasting Services; Junction, Melvin, and Menard, TX, 11817 [E7-4544]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS adopt all six control measures that New Jersey identified as necessary to attain the 1-hour ozone standard. Therefore, EPA will not proceed with the May 27, 2004 (69 FR 30249) proposed Finding of Failure to Implement. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:24 Mar 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply. This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 6, 2007. Alan J. Steinberg, Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. E7–4665 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 11817 Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 800–378–3160 or https:// www.BCPIWEB.com. In response to a rulemaking petition filed by Charles Crawford, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposed the allotment of Channel 242A at Melvin, Texas. To accommodate this allotment, it also proposed the substitution of Channel 292A for vacant Channel 242A at Menard, Texas, and the substitution of Channel 224A for vacant Channel 292A at Junction, Texas. The withdrawal of the petition for rulemaking complies with Section 1.420(j) of the Commission’s rules because the rulemaking petitioner is not receiving any money or other consideration in return for the withdrawal. See 70 FR 19398 (April 13, 2005). This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Report and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the petition for rulemaking was dismissed). Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. E7–4544 Filed 3–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P [DA 07–805; MB Docket No. 05–132; RM– 11217] Radio Broadcasting Services; Junction, Melvin, and Menard, TX Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 350, 385, 395, and 396 [DOT Docket No. FMCSA–2004–18940] The staff approves the withdrawal of a petition for rulemaking in this FM allotment rulemaking proceeding See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2180. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Report and Order, MB Docket No. 05–132, adopted February 21, 2007, and released February 23, 2007. The full text of this PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 RIN 2126–AA89 Electronic On-Board Recorders (EOBRs) for Documenting Hours of Service; Listening Sessions Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of public listening sessions. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) announces public listening sessions to E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM 14MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 14, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4544]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 07-805; MB Docket No. 05-132; RM-11217]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Junction, Melvin, and Menard, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The staff approves the withdrawal of a petition for rulemaking 
in this FM allotment rulemaking proceeding See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 05-132, adopted February 21, 2007, and 
released February 23, 2007. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com.
    In response to a rulemaking petition filed by Charles Crawford, the 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposed the allotment of Channel 242A at 
Melvin, Texas. To accommodate this allotment, it also proposed the 
substitution of Channel 292A for vacant Channel 242A at Menard, Texas, 
and the substitution of Channel 224A for vacant Channel 292A at 
Junction, Texas. The withdrawal of the petition for rulemaking complies 
with Section 1.420(j) of the Commission's rules because the rulemaking 
petitioner is not receiving any money or other consideration in return 
for the withdrawal. See 70 FR 19398 (April 13, 2005).
    This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The 
Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Report 
and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the petition for rulemaking was dismissed).

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
 [FR Doc. E7-4544 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.