Issuance of Permits, 11377-11378 [E7-4547]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
2. U.S. mail or in-person pickup: By
appointment, during normal business
hours, at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, University Hall, Room 309,
University of Montana, Missoula, MT
59812. Call (406) 243–4903 to make
arrangements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear
Recovery Coordinator (see ADDRESSES
above), (406) 243–4903.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring an endangered or
threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure member of its
ecosystem is a primary goal of our
endangered species program. Recovery
plans help guide recovery efforts by
describing actions we consider
necessary for the conservation of the
species, establishing criteria for
downlisting and delisting listed species,
and estimating time and cost for
implementing the measures needed for
recovery measures. Under the
provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we approved the
first Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan on
January 29, 1982 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service 1982). In 1993, we approved a
revision to the Grizzly Bear Recovery
Plan (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
1993), which included additional tasks
and new information that increased the
focus and effectiveness of recovery
efforts. Supplements to the Recovery
Plan were approved in 1997 and 1998
(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1997,
1998).
In 1994, The Fund for Animals, Inc.,
and 42 other organizations and
individuals filed suit over the adequacy
of the 1993 Recovery Plan. In 1995, the
U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia issued an order remanding for
further study and clarification four
issues relevant to the Yellowstone
grizzly bear population including the
methods we use to measure the status of
bear populations (Fund for Animals v.
Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96 (D. D.C. 1995)).
Following appeals by both parties, we
entered into a subsequent settlement
agreeing to establish habitat-based
recovery criteria prior to any delisting
action (Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 967
F. Supp. 6 (D. D.C. 1997)).
Regarding the methods used to
measure the status of bear populations,
beginning in 2000, the Interagency
Grizzly Bear Study Team, which the
U.S. Geological Survey leads in
cooperation with various University
specialists, began a comprehensive
evaluation of the demographic data and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:58 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the methodology used to estimate
population size and establish the
sustainable level of mortality for grizzly
bears in the Greater Yellowstone Area.
The Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan Task
Y11 also recommended further
consideration of population objectives,
stating that the team should work to
‘‘determine population conditions at
which the species is viable and self
sustaining’’ and ‘‘reevaluate and refine
population criteria as new information
becomes available’’ for the Yellowstone
population of grizzly bears (U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service 1993, p. 44). After
evaluating current methods, scientific
literature, and alternative methods, the
Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team
recommended the most valid technique
based on the best available science
(Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team
2005, 2007) and drafted the Reassessing
Methods to Estimate Population Size
and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the
Yellowstone Grizzly Bear document
(Reassessing Methods document). As
per section 4(f) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1533(f)), we released a draft version of
the Reassessing Methods document for
public comment on November 22, 2005
(70 FR 70632). Considering all
comments received, the Study Team
produced a Supplement to the
Reassessing Methods document
(Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team
2006) and finalized this document. We
have attached relevant portions of these
reports to the Grizzly Bear Recovery
Plan (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
1993) in a supplement.
Regarding the settlement agreeing to
establish habitat-based recovery criteria
prior to any delisting action, on June 17,
1997, we held a public workshop in
Bozeman, Montana, to develop and
refine habitat-based recovery criteria for
the Yellowstone grizzly bear population.
A Federal Register notice notified the
public of this workshop and provided
interested parties an opportunity to
participate and submit comments (62 FR
19777, April 23, 1997). Grizzly Bear
Recovery Plan Task Y423 also
recommended further consideration of
this issue, stating that we should work
to ‘‘establish a threshold of minimal
habitat values to be maintained within
each Cumulative Effects Analysis Unit
in order to ensure that sufficient habitat
is available to support a viable
population’’ (U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service 1993, p. 55). After considering
1,167 written comments, we developed
biologically-based habitat criteria with
the goal of maintaining or improving
habitat conditions at 1998 levels. As per
section 4(f) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1533(f)), we published these draft
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11377
criteria in the Federal Register for
review and comment on July 16, 1999
(64 FR 38464). Considering all
comments we received, we finalized the
Habitat-Based Recovery Criteria. We
have attached the established HabitatBased Recovery Criteria to the Grizzly
Bear Recovery Plan (U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service 1993) in a supplement.
References Cited
To obtain a complete list of all
references cited herein, contact the
Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator (see
ADDRESSES above).
Authority
The authority for this Notice is
section 4(f) of the Endangered Species
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: January 10, 2007.
James J. Slack,
Deputy Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. E7–4568 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Issuance of Permits
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits for
endangered species and marine
mammals.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
The following permits were
issued.
Documents and other
information submitted with these
applications are available for review,
subject to the requirements of the
Privacy Act and Freedom of Information
Act, by any party who submits a written
request for a copy of such documents to:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division
of Management Authority, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington,
Virginia 22203; fax 703/358–2281.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Division of Management Authority,
telephone 703/358–2104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on the dates below, as
authorized by the provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and
the Marine Mammal Protection Act of
1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.), the Fish and Wildlife Service
issued the requested permits subject to
certain conditions set forth therein. For
each permit for an endangered species,
the Service found that (1) The
application was filed in good faith, (2)
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
11378
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the granted permit would not operate to
the disadvantage of the endangered
species, and (3) the granted permit
would be consistent with the purposes
and policy set forth in Section 2 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended.
ENDANGERED SPECIES
Receipt of application Federal
Register notice
Permit number
Applicant
138823 .......................................................
Kathlyn C. Story ........................................
139893 .......................................................
Dr. Michael L. Fetterolf ..............................
140189 .......................................................
James M. Shook ........................................
140644 .......................................................
Carroll E. Moran ........................................
71 FR
2006.
71 FR
2006.
71 FR
2006.
71 FR
2006.
Permit issuance
date
76685, December 21,
January 30, 2007.
76684, December 21,
January 30, 2007.
76684, December 21,
January 30, 2007.
76682, December 21,
January 30, 2007.
Marine Mammals
Permit number
Applicant
Receipt of application Federal
Register notice
Permit issuance
date
MA101713 ..................................................
The Marine Mammal Center .....................
71 FR 44679; August 3, 2005 ....
January 29, 2007.
Dated: February 16, 2007.
Monica Farris,
Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits,
Division of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. E7–4547 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am]
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent exclusion order and a
permanent cease and desist order.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
[Inv. No. 337–TA–596]
In the Matter of Certain GPS Chips,
Associated Software and Systems, and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
February 8, 2007, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of SiRF
Technology, Inc. of San Jose, California.
A supplemental letter was filed on
February 22, 2007. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain GPS chips,
associated software and systems, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
6,304,216; 7,043,363; 7,091,904; and
7,132,980. The complaint, as
supplemented, further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:58 Mar 12, 2007
The complaint and
supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202–205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Jkt 211001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Baer, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–2221.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
March 7, 2007, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain GPS chips,
associated software or systems, or
products containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
3, 5–19, 21–36, 38–59, 61–78, and 80–
87 of U.S. Patent No. 6,304,216; claims
1–2, 4–8, 10–12, 16, and 18–20 of U.S.
Patent No. 7,043,363; claims 1, 3, 5–8,
10–12, 14, 16–18, and 20–21 of U.S.
Patent No. 7,091,904; and claims 1, 5–
7, 10–11, 13–14, 16–17, 24, 29–32, and
34 of U.S. Patent No. 7,132,980; and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—SiRF
Technology, Inc., 217 Devcon Drive, San
Jose, CA 95112.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Global Locate, Inc., 3190 South Bascom
Ave., San Jose, CA 92618.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11377-11378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4547]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Issuance of Permits
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits for endangered species and marine
mammals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The following permits were issued.
ADDRESSES: Documents and other information submitted with these
applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of
the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who
submits a written request for a copy of such documents to: U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203; fax 703/358-2281.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of Management Authority,
telephone 703/358-2104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on the dates
below, as authorized by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Fish
and Wildlife Service issued the requested permits subject to certain
conditions set forth therein. For each permit for an endangered
species, the Service found that (1) The application was filed in good
faith, (2)
[[Page 11378]]
the granted permit would not operate to the disadvantage of the
endangered species, and (3) the granted permit would be consistent with
the purposes and policy set forth in Section 2 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended.
Endangered Species
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Receipt of application Federal Register
Permit number Applicant notice Permit issuance date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
138823...................... Kathlyn C. 71 FR 76685, December 21, 2006.......... January 30, 2007.
Story.
139893...................... Dr. Michael L. 71 FR 76684, December 21, 2006.......... January 30, 2007.
Fetterolf.
140189...................... James M. Shook. 71 FR 76684, December 21, 2006.......... January 30, 2007.
140644...................... Carroll E. 71 FR 76682, December 21, 2006.......... January 30, 2007.
Moran.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine Mammals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Receipt of application Federal Register
Permit number Applicant notice Permit issuance date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA101713.................... The Marine 71 FR 44679; August 3, 2005............. January 29, 2007.
Mammal Center.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: February 16, 2007.
Monica Farris,
Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management
Authority.
[FR Doc. E7-4547 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P