Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review; Comment Request, 11054-11055 [E7-4406]
Download as PDF
11054
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
KANSAS
Crawford County
Raymond Community Home, 301 Osage St.,
Girard, 07000255
Doniphan County
Highland Christian Church, (Highland,
Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 102 E.
Main St., Highland, 07000250
Highland Presbyterian Church, (Highland,
Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 101 South
Ave., Highland, 07000248
Highland Water Tower, (Highland, Doniphan
County, Kansas MPS), Jct. N. Genesee and
W. Illinois Sts., Highland, 07000249
Wynkoop, A.L., House, (Highland, Doniphan
County, Kansas MPS), 307 West
Pennsylvania, Highland, 07000251
Sedgwick County
Johnson Drug Store Building, 2329 E. Central,
Wichita, 07000254
Keep Klean Building, 810 E. Third, Wichita,
07000252
Stoner Apartment Building, 938–940 North
Market, Wichita, 07000253
OKLAHOMA
Coal County
Johnson County
Smith Ranch, FM 916, 1 mi. W of TX 174,
Rio Vista, 07000271
San Augustine County
San Augustine Commercial Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Main St.,
Montgomery St., Congress St., Broadway,
Columbia St., property lines and Golden
Way, San Augustine, 07000269
Tarrant County
Kress Building, 604 Main St., Fort Worth,
07000266
VIRGINIA
Goochland County
Tinsley Tavern, 2791 Elk Island Rd.,
Columbia, 07000276
Isle Of Wight County
Ivy Hill Cemetery, W. of N. Church St.,
Smithfield, 07000275
Loudoun County
Purcellville Historic District, Roughly
bounded by W&OD Trail, S. 32nd St., W.
F and E. G Sts., and Maple Ave.,
Purcellville, 07000277
Louisa County
Boxley Place, 103 Ellisville Dr., Louisa,
07000273
Keel Creek Bridge, OK 31 over Keel Creek,
Coalgate, 07000257
Jackson County
Perryman Ranch Headquarters, 0.2 mi. E. of
jct. of Cty. Rds. N193 and E159, Duke,
07000260
Oklahoma County
Norfolk Independent City
Zion Methodist Church, 2729 Bowden’s
Ferry Rd., Norfolk (Independent City),
07000274.
[FR Doc. E7–4317 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
Douglass High School, Old, 600 N. High
Ave., Oklahoma City, 07000259
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
Pontotoc County
Meaders, F.W., House, 521 South Broadway,
Ada, 07000258
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
OREGON
Agency Information Collection
Activities Under OMB Review;
Comment Request
Multnomah County
Baruh—Zell House, 3131 SE Talbot Rd.,
Portland, 07000256
Goldsmith, Alan and Barbara, House, 4140
SW Greenleaf Court, Portland, 07000261
Lane—Miles Standish Company Printing
Plant, 1539 NW 19th Ave., Portland,
07000262
Wilson—Chambers Mortuary, 430 N.
Killingsworth St., Portland, 07000263
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice and Request for
Comments.
AGENCY:
RHODE ISLAND
Providence County
Earnscliffe Woolen—Paragon Worsted
Company Mill Complex, 25 and 39 Manton
Ave., Providence, 07000265
Howard, Ebenezer, House, 1264 Round Top
Rd., Burrillville, 07000264
TEXAS
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Bee County
Beeville Post Office, 111 N. St. Mary’s St.,
Beeville, 07000272
Cooke County
Nelson Farmstead, 7729 FM 678, Gainesville,
07000270
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces the following Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval: Recreation Survey, New
Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
cost and hour burden.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove this information
collection, but may respond after 30
days; therefore, public comment must
be received on or before April 11, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Please send your comments
to the Desk Officer for the Department
of the Interior at the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, via
facsimile to (202) 395–6566 or e-mail to
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy
of your comments should also be
directed to the Bureau of Reclamation,
Attention: E. Vasquez, CC 419, 7794
Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630,
or directed via e-mail to
evasquez@mp.usbr.gov. Please reference
OMB No. 1006–NEW in your comments.
ADDRESSES:
For
further information or a copy of the
proposed forms contact Ms. Elizabeth
Vasquez at the above address, or at (916)
989–7192.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Title:
Recreation Survey, New Melones Lake
Project, Sonora, CA.
Abstract: The purpose of the on-site
recreation survey is to characterize
existing users, characterize their use of
the New Melones Project, assess their
satisfaction with their experience and
the facilities, and find out what other
opportunities or facilities they would
like to see developed at the New
Melones Lake Project. The purpose of
the regional telephone survey is to
characterize regional population, their
outdoor recreation use, the demand for
various types of outdoor recreation
activities, trends in outdoor recreation
use, and the extent to which the
regional population uses New Melones
Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The on-site
survey and the regional telephone
survey shall describe the recreational
preferences of visitors to the New
Melones Lake Project and provide
guidance on what recreational planning
objectives should be included in the
New Melones Lake Project RMP/EIS.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB No. 1006–NEW
Frequency: One-time voluntary
survey.
Respondents for On-site Survey:
Persons who recreate at New Melones
Lake Project.
Respondents for Telephone Survey:
Residents of Sonora and Tuolumne
counties.
Estimated Total Number of
Respondents: 1,750.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 438 hours.
Estimate of Burden for Each Form:
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
11055
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
Form
Burden
estimate per
form
(in minutes)
On-site survey ..............................................................................................................................
Telephone survey ........................................................................................................................
Total ......................................................................................................................................
15
15
........................
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
A notice allowing the public a 60-day
comment period was published in the
Federal Register on May 2, 2006 (71 FR
25857, May 2, 2006). No comments were
received in response to the 60-day
comment period. The Public now has a
second chance to comment.
Drug Enforcement Administration
Comments are Invited on
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of our functions, including
whether the information will have
practical use;
(b) the accuracy of our burden
estimate for the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Reclamation will
display a valid OMB control number on
the survey forms.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Michael R. Finnegan,
Area Manager, Central California Area Office,
Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. E7–4406 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Docket No. 05–22]
Planet Trading, Inc., d/b/a/ United
Wholesale Distributors, Inc.; Denial of
Application
On February 15, 2005, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Planet Trading, Inc.,
(Respondent) of Orlando, Florida. The
Show Cause Order proposed to deny
Respondent’s pending application for a
DEA Certificate of Registration as a
distributor of the list I chemicals
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine on the
ground that Respondent’s registration
would be inconsistent with the public
interest. Show Cause Order at 1, see
also 21 U.S.C. 823(h).
More specifically, the Show Cause
Order alleged that both ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine are ‘‘commonly used
to illegally manufacture
methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.’’ Show Cause
Order at 1. The Show Cause Order
alleged that ‘‘DEA knows by
experience’’ that a ‘‘gray market’’ exists
‘‘in which certain pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine products are distributed only
to convenience stores and gas stations,
from where they have a high incidence
of diversion’’ into the illicit
manufacture of methamphetamine. Id.
at 2. Relatedly, the Show Cause Order
alleged that only ‘‘[a] very small
percentage’’ of legitimate sales of list I
chemical products occur in gray market
retailers and that the average gray
market retailer ‘‘could expect to sell
* * * only about $10.00 to $30.00
worth of pseudoephedrine products’’ a
month. Id. at 3. The Show Cause Order
also alleged that the expected sales for
combination ephedrine products are
‘‘only one-fourth of’’ this amount. Id.
The Show Cause Order alleged that
during a pre-registration investigation,
Respondent’s president advised DEA
investigators that his firm distributes
sundry items and tobacco products to
convenience stores, gas stations, and
small independent groceries, which
constitute the gray market for list I
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of respondents
Annual burden
on
respondents
(in hours)
1,250
500
1,750
313
125
438
chemical products. Id. at 2. The Show
Cause Order further alleged that during
an interview, Respondent stated that he
had ‘‘little or no background in handling
list I chemical products.’’ Id. The Show
Cause Order also alleged that
Respondent told the investigators that
he intended to sell list I products that
were marketed in bottles and not blister
packs because the latter ‘‘were not good
sellers.’’ Id.
The Show Cause Order also alleged
that Respondent intended to store the
list I products in a warehouse ‘‘with all
other items [and] without any additional
security installed.’’ Id. at 3. The Show
Cause Order further alleged that
‘‘[b]ecause [Respondent’s] customers are
allowed to serve themselves from the
warehouse shelves, all customers will
have unescorted access to the list I
chemicals stored in the warehouse.’’ Id.
Finally, the Show Cause Order alleged
that Respondent’s ‘‘proposed sales of
combination ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine products are
inconsistent with the known legitimate
market and known end-user demand for
products of this type,’’ and thus
Respondent ‘‘would be serving an
illegitimate market for [these]
product[s].’’ Id. The Show Cause Order
concluded by alleging that because
Respondent’s owner had ‘‘no experience
handling list I chemicals’’ and its
warehouse has ‘‘insufficient security,’’
its ‘‘registration would likely lead to
increased diversion of list I chemicals.’’
Id.
Respondent, through its owner Mr.
Vihang Patel, requested a hearing. The
case was assigned to Administrative
Law Judge (ALJ) Mary Ellen Bittner,
who conducted a hearing in Tampa,
Florida, on November 1, 2005. At the
hearing, both parties put on witnesses
and introduced documentary evidence.
Following the hearing, the Government
submitted proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
On April 25, 2006, the Administrative
Law Judge submitted her decision
which recommended that Respondent’s
application be denied. Neither party
filed exceptions. The record was then
forwarded to me for final agency action.
Having considered the record as a
whole, I hereby issue this decision and
final order. I adopt the ALJ’s decision in
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11054-11055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces the following Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval: Recreation Survey, New
Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected cost and hour burden.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove this information
collection, but may respond after 30 days; therefore, public comment
must be received on or before April 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior at the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, via facsimile to (202)
395-6566 or e-mail to OIRA--DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy of your comments
should also be directed to the Bureau of Reclamation, Attention: E.
Vasquez, CC 419, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630, or directed
via e-mail to evasquez@mp.usbr.gov. Please reference OMB No. 1006-NEW
in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or a copy of
the proposed forms contact Ms. Elizabeth Vasquez at the above address,
or at (916) 989-7192.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Recreation Survey, New Melones Lake
Project, Sonora, CA.
Abstract: The purpose of the on-site recreation survey is to
characterize existing users, characterize their use of the New Melones
Project, assess their satisfaction with their experience and the
facilities, and find out what other opportunities or facilities they
would like to see developed at the New Melones Lake Project. The
purpose of the regional telephone survey is to characterize regional
population, their outdoor recreation use, the demand for various types
of outdoor recreation activities, trends in outdoor recreation use, and
the extent to which the regional population uses New Melones Lake
Project, Sonora, CA. The on-site survey and the regional telephone
survey shall describe the recreational preferences of visitors to the
New Melones Lake Project and provide guidance on what recreational
planning objectives should be included in the New Melones Lake Project
RMP/EIS.
OMB No. 1006-NEW
Frequency: One-time voluntary survey.
Respondents for On-site Survey: Persons who recreate at New Melones
Lake Project.
Respondents for Telephone Survey: Residents of Sonora and Tuolumne
counties.
Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 1,750.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 438 hours.
Estimate of Burden for Each Form:
[[Page 11055]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden Annual burden
estimate per Number of on
Form form (in respondents respondents
minutes) (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-site survey.................................................. 15 1,250 313
Telephone survey................................................ 15 500 125
Total....................................................... .............. 1,750 438
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
A notice allowing the public a 60-day comment period was published
in the Federal Register on May 2, 2006 (71 FR 25857, May 2, 2006). No
comments were received in response to the 60-day comment period. The
Public now has a second chance to comment.
Comments are Invited on
(a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of our functions, including whether the
information will have practical use;
(b) the accuracy of our burden estimate for the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. Reclamation will display a valid
OMB control number on the survey forms.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Michael R. Finnegan,
Area Manager, Central California Area Office, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. E7-4406 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P