Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review; Comment Request, 11054-11055 [E7-4406]

Download as PDF 11054 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices KANSAS Crawford County Raymond Community Home, 301 Osage St., Girard, 07000255 Doniphan County Highland Christian Church, (Highland, Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 102 E. Main St., Highland, 07000250 Highland Presbyterian Church, (Highland, Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 101 South Ave., Highland, 07000248 Highland Water Tower, (Highland, Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), Jct. N. Genesee and W. Illinois Sts., Highland, 07000249 Wynkoop, A.L., House, (Highland, Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 307 West Pennsylvania, Highland, 07000251 Sedgwick County Johnson Drug Store Building, 2329 E. Central, Wichita, 07000254 Keep Klean Building, 810 E. Third, Wichita, 07000252 Stoner Apartment Building, 938–940 North Market, Wichita, 07000253 OKLAHOMA Coal County Johnson County Smith Ranch, FM 916, 1 mi. W of TX 174, Rio Vista, 07000271 San Augustine County San Augustine Commercial Historic District, Roughly bounded by Main St., Montgomery St., Congress St., Broadway, Columbia St., property lines and Golden Way, San Augustine, 07000269 Tarrant County Kress Building, 604 Main St., Fort Worth, 07000266 VIRGINIA Goochland County Tinsley Tavern, 2791 Elk Island Rd., Columbia, 07000276 Isle Of Wight County Ivy Hill Cemetery, W. of N. Church St., Smithfield, 07000275 Loudoun County Purcellville Historic District, Roughly bounded by W&OD Trail, S. 32nd St., W. F and E. G Sts., and Maple Ave., Purcellville, 07000277 Louisa County Boxley Place, 103 Ellisville Dr., Louisa, 07000273 Keel Creek Bridge, OK 31 over Keel Creek, Coalgate, 07000257 Jackson County Perryman Ranch Headquarters, 0.2 mi. E. of jct. of Cty. Rds. N193 and E159, Duke, 07000260 Oklahoma County Norfolk Independent City Zion Methodist Church, 2729 Bowden’s Ferry Rd., Norfolk (Independent City), 07000274. [FR Doc. E7–4317 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am] Douglass High School, Old, 600 N. High Ave., Oklahoma City, 07000259 BILLING CODE 4312–51–P Pontotoc County Meaders, F.W., House, 521 South Broadway, Ada, 07000258 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation OREGON Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review; Comment Request Multnomah County Baruh—Zell House, 3131 SE Talbot Rd., Portland, 07000256 Goldsmith, Alan and Barbara, House, 4140 SW Greenleaf Court, Portland, 07000261 Lane—Miles Standish Company Printing Plant, 1539 NW 19th Ave., Portland, 07000262 Wilson—Chambers Mortuary, 430 N. Killingsworth St., Portland, 07000263 Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments. AGENCY: RHODE ISLAND Providence County Earnscliffe Woolen—Paragon Worsted Company Mill Complex, 25 and 39 Manton Ave., Providence, 07000265 Howard, Ebenezer, House, 1264 Round Top Rd., Burrillville, 07000264 TEXAS pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Bee County Beeville Post Office, 111 N. St. Mary’s St., Beeville, 07000272 Cooke County Nelson Farmstead, 7729 FM 678, Gainesville, 07000270 VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:04 Mar 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces the following Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval: Recreation Survey, New Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and hour burden. DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove this information collection, but may respond after 30 days; therefore, public comment must be received on or before April 11, 2007. PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Please send your comments to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, via facsimile to (202) 395–6566 or e-mail to OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy of your comments should also be directed to the Bureau of Reclamation, Attention: E. Vasquez, CC 419, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630, or directed via e-mail to evasquez@mp.usbr.gov. Please reference OMB No. 1006–NEW in your comments. ADDRESSES: For further information or a copy of the proposed forms contact Ms. Elizabeth Vasquez at the above address, or at (916) 989–7192. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Title: Recreation Survey, New Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. Abstract: The purpose of the on-site recreation survey is to characterize existing users, characterize their use of the New Melones Project, assess their satisfaction with their experience and the facilities, and find out what other opportunities or facilities they would like to see developed at the New Melones Lake Project. The purpose of the regional telephone survey is to characterize regional population, their outdoor recreation use, the demand for various types of outdoor recreation activities, trends in outdoor recreation use, and the extent to which the regional population uses New Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The on-site survey and the regional telephone survey shall describe the recreational preferences of visitors to the New Melones Lake Project and provide guidance on what recreational planning objectives should be included in the New Melones Lake Project RMP/EIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB No. 1006–NEW Frequency: One-time voluntary survey. Respondents for On-site Survey: Persons who recreate at New Melones Lake Project. Respondents for Telephone Survey: Residents of Sonora and Tuolumne counties. Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 1,750. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 438 hours. Estimate of Burden for Each Form: E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1 11055 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices Form Burden estimate per form (in minutes) On-site survey .............................................................................................................................. Telephone survey ........................................................................................................................ Total ...................................................................................................................................... 15 15 ........................ Comments DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE A notice allowing the public a 60-day comment period was published in the Federal Register on May 2, 2006 (71 FR 25857, May 2, 2006). No comments were received in response to the 60-day comment period. The Public now has a second chance to comment. Drug Enforcement Administration Comments are Invited on (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of our functions, including whether the information will have practical use; (b) the accuracy of our burden estimate for the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Reclamation will display a valid OMB control number on the survey forms. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Michael R. Finnegan, Area Manager, Central California Area Office, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. E7–4406 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:04 Mar 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 [Docket No. 05–22] Planet Trading, Inc., d/b/a/ United Wholesale Distributors, Inc.; Denial of Application On February 15, 2005, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, issued an Order to Show Cause to Planet Trading, Inc., (Respondent) of Orlando, Florida. The Show Cause Order proposed to deny Respondent’s pending application for a DEA Certificate of Registration as a distributor of the list I chemicals ephedrine and pseudoephedrine on the ground that Respondent’s registration would be inconsistent with the public interest. Show Cause Order at 1, see also 21 U.S.C. 823(h). More specifically, the Show Cause Order alleged that both ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are ‘‘commonly used to illegally manufacture methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance.’’ Show Cause Order at 1. The Show Cause Order alleged that ‘‘DEA knows by experience’’ that a ‘‘gray market’’ exists ‘‘in which certain pseudoephedrine and ephedrine products are distributed only to convenience stores and gas stations, from where they have a high incidence of diversion’’ into the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine. Id. at 2. Relatedly, the Show Cause Order alleged that only ‘‘[a] very small percentage’’ of legitimate sales of list I chemical products occur in gray market retailers and that the average gray market retailer ‘‘could expect to sell * * * only about $10.00 to $30.00 worth of pseudoephedrine products’’ a month. Id. at 3. The Show Cause Order also alleged that the expected sales for combination ephedrine products are ‘‘only one-fourth of’’ this amount. Id. The Show Cause Order alleged that during a pre-registration investigation, Respondent’s president advised DEA investigators that his firm distributes sundry items and tobacco products to convenience stores, gas stations, and small independent groceries, which constitute the gray market for list I PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Number of respondents Annual burden on respondents (in hours) 1,250 500 1,750 313 125 438 chemical products. Id. at 2. The Show Cause Order further alleged that during an interview, Respondent stated that he had ‘‘little or no background in handling list I chemical products.’’ Id. The Show Cause Order also alleged that Respondent told the investigators that he intended to sell list I products that were marketed in bottles and not blister packs because the latter ‘‘were not good sellers.’’ Id. The Show Cause Order also alleged that Respondent intended to store the list I products in a warehouse ‘‘with all other items [and] without any additional security installed.’’ Id. at 3. The Show Cause Order further alleged that ‘‘[b]ecause [Respondent’s] customers are allowed to serve themselves from the warehouse shelves, all customers will have unescorted access to the list I chemicals stored in the warehouse.’’ Id. Finally, the Show Cause Order alleged that Respondent’s ‘‘proposed sales of combination ephedrine and pseudoephedrine products are inconsistent with the known legitimate market and known end-user demand for products of this type,’’ and thus Respondent ‘‘would be serving an illegitimate market for [these] product[s].’’ Id. The Show Cause Order concluded by alleging that because Respondent’s owner had ‘‘no experience handling list I chemicals’’ and its warehouse has ‘‘insufficient security,’’ its ‘‘registration would likely lead to increased diversion of list I chemicals.’’ Id. Respondent, through its owner Mr. Vihang Patel, requested a hearing. The case was assigned to Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Mary Ellen Bittner, who conducted a hearing in Tampa, Florida, on November 1, 2005. At the hearing, both parties put on witnesses and introduced documentary evidence. Following the hearing, the Government submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. On April 25, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge submitted her decision which recommended that Respondent’s application be denied. Neither party filed exceptions. The record was then forwarded to me for final agency action. Having considered the record as a whole, I hereby issue this decision and final order. I adopt the ALJ’s decision in E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11054-11055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces the following Information 
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval: Recreation Survey, New 
Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The ICR describes the nature of the 
information collection and its expected cost and hour burden.

DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove this information 
collection, but may respond after 30 days; therefore, public comment 
must be received on or before April 11, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Please send your comments to the Desk Officer for the 
Department of the Interior at the Office of Management and Budget, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, via facsimile to (202) 
395-6566 or e-mail to OIRA--DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy of your comments 
should also be directed to the Bureau of Reclamation, Attention: E. 
Vasquez, CC 419, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630, or directed 
via e-mail to evasquez@mp.usbr.gov. Please reference OMB No. 1006-NEW 
in your comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or a copy of 
the proposed forms contact Ms. Elizabeth Vasquez at the above address, 
or at (916) 989-7192.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Recreation Survey, New Melones Lake 
Project, Sonora, CA.
    Abstract: The purpose of the on-site recreation survey is to 
characterize existing users, characterize their use of the New Melones 
Project, assess their satisfaction with their experience and the 
facilities, and find out what other opportunities or facilities they 
would like to see developed at the New Melones Lake Project. The 
purpose of the regional telephone survey is to characterize regional 
population, their outdoor recreation use, the demand for various types 
of outdoor recreation activities, trends in outdoor recreation use, and 
the extent to which the regional population uses New Melones Lake 
Project, Sonora, CA. The on-site survey and the regional telephone 
survey shall describe the recreational preferences of visitors to the 
New Melones Lake Project and provide guidance on what recreational 
planning objectives should be included in the New Melones Lake Project 
RMP/EIS.

OMB No. 1006-NEW

    Frequency: One-time voluntary survey.
    Respondents for On-site Survey: Persons who recreate at New Melones 
Lake Project.
    Respondents for Telephone Survey: Residents of Sonora and Tuolumne 
counties.
    Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 1,750.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 438 hours.
    Estimate of Burden for Each Form:

[[Page 11055]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Burden                       Annual burden
                                                                   estimate per      Number of          on
                              Form                                   form  (in      respondents     respondents
                                                                     minutes)                       (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On-site survey..................................................              15           1,250             313
Telephone survey................................................              15             500             125
    Total.......................................................  ..............           1,750             438
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

    A notice allowing the public a 60-day comment period was published 
in the Federal Register on May 2, 2006 (71 FR 25857, May 2, 2006). No 
comments were received in response to the 60-day comment period. The 
Public now has a second chance to comment.

Comments are Invited on

    (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of our functions, including whether the 
information will have practical use;
    (b) the accuracy of our burden estimate for the proposed collection 
of information, including the validity of the methodology and 
assumptions used;
    (c) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. Reclamation will display a valid 
OMB control number on the survey forms.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

Michael R. Finnegan,
Area Manager, Central California Area Office, Mid-Pacific Region.
 [FR Doc. E7-4406 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P