Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 Turboshaft Engines, 10622-10624 [E7-4244]
Download as PDF
10622
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et.seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Ente Nazionale per
l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC), AD N. 2004–522,
Rev. 0, dated December 20, 2004; and
Vulcanair S.p.A. P68 Variants Mandatory
Service Bulletin No. 128, dated October 12,
2004, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
2, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–4242 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–21242; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NE–09–AD]
RIN 21207–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca
Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 Turboshaft
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for certain Turbomeca
Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft
engines. That AD currently requires
initial and repetitive position checks of
the gas generator 2nd stage turbine
blades on all Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D,
1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft engines. That
AD also currently requires initial and
repetitive replacements of 2nd stage
turbines on 1B, 1D, and 1D1 engines
only. This proposed AD would require
adding a 3,000 hour life limit to Arriel
1B 2nd Stage Turbine Blades. This
proposed AD results from reports of
failures of second stage blades. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failures of
the 2nd stage turbine blades, which
could result in uncommanded in-flight
engine shutdown, and subsequent
forced autorotation landing or accident.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by May 8, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:34 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Turbomeca, 40220 Tarnos,
France; telephone (33) 05 59 74 40 00,
fax (33) 05 59 74 45 15, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Spinney, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781)
238–7175, fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–21242; Directorate Identifier
2005–NE–09–AD’’ in the subject line of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the DMS
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person at the DMS Docket Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is located on the plaza level of the
Department of Transportation Nassif
Building at the street address stated in
ADDRESSES. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after the DMS
receives them.
Discussion
On August 8, 2006, the FAA issued
AD 2006–02–08R1, Amendment 39–
14721 (71 FR 46390, August 14, 2006).
That AD requires initial and repetitive
position checks of the gas generator 2nd
stage turbine blades on all Turbomeca
Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft
engines, and initial and repetitive
replacements of 2nd stage turbines on
1B, 1D, and 1D1 engines only. The
Direction Generale de L’Aviation Civile
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness
authority for France, notified the FAA
that an unsafe condition might exist on
Turbomeca, Arriel 1B (modified per TU
148), 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft
engines. The DGAC advises that sixteen
cases of release of gas generator 2nd
stage turbine blades occurred in service,
with full containment of debris. These
events resulted in uncommanded inflight engine shutdowns. Although
terminating action is still unavailable,
mandatory checks of the turbine blades
and replacement of the turbine are being
required in order to reduce the
probability of an uncommanded inflight engine shutdown. That AD
requires initial and repetitive position
checks of the gas generator 2nd stage
turbine blades on all Turbomeca Arriel
1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft
engines. That AD also requires initial
and repetitive replacements of 2nd stage
turbines on 1B, 1D, and 1D1 engines
only. That condition, if not corrected,
could result in uncommanded in-flight
engine shutdown.
Actions Since AD 2006–02–08R1 Was
Issued
Since we issued that AD, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) informed us that they have
received reports of additional failures of
the 2nd stage turbine blades. The debris
from the failures was fully contained.
The failures were caused by:
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
• Deterioration of 2nd stage nozzle
guide vanes (NGV2) modified to TU197,
• Aerodynamic excitation from
deteriorated NGV2,
• Excessive temperature on the firtree roots, and
• 2nd stage turbine blades modified
to TU204.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of Turbomeca Alert
Service Bulletins (ASBs) A292 72 0807,
Update 1, dated October 26, 2006, for
Arriel 1B post-TU 148; ASB A292 72
0809, dated October 4, 2005, for Arriel
1D and 1D1; and ASB A292 72 0810, for
Arriel 1S1, all dated March 24, 2004.
These ASBs describe procedures for
initial and repetitive position checks of
the 2nd stage turbine blades, and
replacement of 2nd stage turbines on 1B
and 1D1 engines only. The EASA
classified these ASBs as mandatory and
issued airworthiness directive 2007–
0018, dated January 15, 2007, in order
to ensure the airworthiness of these
Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1
turboshaft engines in the European
Union.
Bilateral Agreement Information
This engine model is manufactured in
France and is type certificated for
operation in the United States under the
provisions of Section 21.29 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.29) and the applicable bilateral
airworthiness agreement. In keeping
with this bilateral airworthiness
agreement, the EASA, which is the
airworthiness authority for the
European Union, kept us informed of
the situation described above. We have
examined the findings of the EASA,
reviewed all available information, and
determined that AD action is necessary
for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United
States.
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require:
• Initial and repetitive position
checks of the 2nd stage turbine blades
on Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and
1S1 turboshaft engines.
• Replacement of 2nd stage turbines
on 1B and 1D1 engines only.
• Initially replacing 2nd stage
turbines in Arriel 1B, 1D, and 1D1
turboshaft engines.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:34 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
The proposed AD would require that
you do these actions using the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
revision would affect 721 engines
installed on helicopters of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 2 work-hours per engine to
inspect all 721 engines and 40 workhours per engine to replace about 587
2nd stage turbines on 1B and 1D1
engines, and that the average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Required parts
would cost about $3,200 per engine.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
total cost of the proposed AD revision
to U.S. operators to be $3,905,240.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10623
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–14721 (71 FR
46390, August 14, 2006) and by adding
a new airworthiness directive, to read as
follows:
Turbomeca: Docket No. FAA–2005–21242;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NE–09–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by May 8,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006–02–08R1,
Amendment 39–14721.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Turbomeca Arriel 1B
engines fitted with 2nd stage turbine
modification TU 148, and Arriel 1D, 1D1,
and 1S1 engines. Arriel 1B engines are
installed on, but not limited to, Eurocopter
France AS–350B and AS–350A ‘‘Ecureuil’’
helicopters. Arriel 1D engines are installed
on, but not limited to, Eurocopter France AS–
350B1 ‘‘Ecureuil’’ helicopters. Arriel 1D1
engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Eurocopter France AS–350B2 ‘‘Ecureuil’’
helicopters. Arriel 1S1 engines are installed
on, but not limited to, Sikorsky Aircraft S–
76A and S–76C helicopters.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of failures
of second stage blades. We are issuing this
AD to prevent failures of the 2nd stage
turbine blades, which could result in
uncommanded in-flight engine shutdown,
and subsequent forced autorotation landing
or accident.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
10624
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Initial Relative Position Check of 2nd Stage
Turbine Blades
(f) Do an initial relative position check of
the 2nd stage turbine blades using the
Turbomeca mandatory alert service bulletins
(ASBs) specified in the following Table 1. Do
the check before reaching any of the intervals
specified in Table 1 or within 50 hours time-
in-service after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
TABLE 1.—INITIAL AND REPETITIVE RELATIVE POSITION CHECK INTERVALS OF 2ND STAGE TURBINE BLADE
Turbomeca engine model
Initial relative position check
interval
Repetitive interval
Mandatory alert service bulletin
Arriel 1B (modified per TU 148) ....
Within 1,200 hours time-sincenew (TSN) or time-since-overhaul (TSO) or 3,500 cyclessince-new (CSN) or cyclessince-overhaul (CSO), whichever occurs earlier.
Within 1,200 hours TSN or TSO
or 3,500 hours CSN or CSO,
whichever occurs earlier.
Within 1,200 hours TSN or TSO
or 3,500 hours CSN or CSO,
whichever occurs earlier.
Within 200 hours time-in-servicesince-last-relative-positioncheck (TSLRPC).
A292 72 0807, Update 1, dated
October 26, 2006.
Within 150 hours TSLRPC ...........
A292 72 0809, Update No. 1,
dated October 4, 2005.
Within 150 hours TSLRPC ...........
A292 72 0810, dated March 24,
2004.
Arriel 1D1 and Arriel 1D ................
Arriel 1S1 .......................................
Repetitive Relative Position Check of 2nd
Stage Turbine Blades
Relative Position Check Continuing
Compliance Requirements
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(g) Recheck the relative position of 2nd
stage turbine blades at the TSLRPC intervals
specified in Table 1 of this AD, using the
mandatory ASBs indicated.
(l) All 2nd stage turbines, including those
that are new or overhauled, must continue to
comply with relative position check
requirements of paragraphs (f) and (j) of this
AD.
Federal Aviation Administration
(h) Relative position checks of 2nd stage
turbine blades done using Turbomeca Service
Bulletin A292 72 0263, Update 1, 2, 3, or 4,
or A292 72 0807, dated March 24, 2004,
comply with the initial requirements of
paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
RIN 2120–AA64
Initial Replacement of 2nd Stage Turbines
on Arriel 1B, 1D, and 1D1 Engines
Related Information
Credit for Previous Relative Position Checks
(i) Initially replace the 2nd stage turbine
with a new or overhauled 2nd stage turbine
as follows:
(1) Before accumulating 1,500 hours TSN
or TSO on the module for Arriel 1D and 1D1
engines.
(2) Before accumulating 2,200 hours TSN
or TSO on the module or 3,000 total hours
TSN on the 2nd stage turbine blades,
whichever occurs first, for Arriel 1B engines.
Repetitive Replacements of 2nd Stage
Turbines on Arriel 1B, 1D, and 1D1 Engines
(j) Thereafter, replace the 2nd stage turbine
with a new or overhauled 2nd stage turbine
within every 1,500 hours TSN or TSO on the
module for Arriel 1D and 1D1 engines, and
within every 2,200 hours TSN or TSO on the
module or 3,000 total hours TSN on the 2nd
stage turbine blades, for Arriel 1B engines.
(m) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
(n) The EASA airworthiness directive
2007–0018, dated January 15, 2007, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
(o) Contact Christopher Spinney,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
Christopher.spinney@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7175; fax (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
March 5, 2007.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–4244 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
(k) Do the following to overhauled 2nd
stage turbines, referenced in paragraphs (i)
and (j) of this AD:
(1) You must install new blades in the 2nd
stage turbines of overhauled Arriel 1D and
1D1 engines.
(2) You may install either overhauled
blades with fewer than 3,000 total hours TSN
or new blades in the 2nd stage turbines of
overhauled Arriel 1B engines.
14:34 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27342; Directorate
Identifier 2007–CE–014–AD]
Airworthiness Directives; APEX
Aircraft Model CAP 10 B Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
A CAP10B aircraft experienced a reduced
elevator deflection by about 13° due to an
incorrect routing of the Push To Talk (PTT)
wire bundle and improperly secured
connectors which impeded the complete and
free movement of the control stick.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
Criteria for Overhauled 2nd Stage Turbines
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14 CFR Part 39
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10622-10624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4244]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-21242; Directorate Identifier 2005-NE-09-AD]
RIN 21207-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1
Turboshaft Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for certain Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1
turboshaft engines. That AD currently requires initial and repetitive
position checks of the gas generator 2nd stage turbine blades on all
Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft engines. That AD also
currently requires initial and repetitive replacements of 2nd stage
turbines on 1B, 1D, and 1D1 engines only. This proposed AD would
require adding a 3,000 hour life limit to Arriel 1B 2nd Stage Turbine
Blades. This proposed AD results from reports of failures of second
stage blades. We are proposing this AD to prevent failures of the 2nd
stage turbine blades, which could result in uncommanded in-flight
engine shutdown, and subsequent forced autorotation landing or
accident.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by May 8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Turbomeca, 40220 Tarnos, France; telephone (33) 05 59 74 40
00, fax (33) 05 59 74 45 15, for the service information identified in
this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Spinney, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
telephone (781) 238-7175, fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2005-21242;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NE-09-AD'' in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of the
DMS Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the docket that contains the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in person at the DMS Docket Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Department of Transportation Nassif Building at
the street address stated in ADDRESSES. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
Discussion
On August 8, 2006, the FAA issued AD 2006-02-08R1, Amendment 39-
14721 (71 FR 46390, August 14, 2006). That AD requires initial and
repetitive position checks of the gas generator 2nd stage turbine
blades on all Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft engines,
and initial and repetitive replacements of 2nd stage turbines on 1B,
1D, and 1D1 engines only. The Direction Generale de L'Aviation Civile
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified the
FAA that an unsafe condition might exist on Turbomeca, Arriel 1B
(modified per TU 148), 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft engines. The DGAC
advises that sixteen cases of release of gas generator 2nd stage
turbine blades occurred in service, with full containment of debris.
These events resulted in uncommanded in-flight engine shutdowns.
Although terminating action is still unavailable, mandatory checks of
the turbine blades and replacement of the turbine are being required in
order to reduce the probability of an uncommanded in-flight engine
shutdown. That AD requires initial and repetitive position checks of
the gas generator 2nd stage turbine blades on all Turbomeca Arriel 1B,
1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft engines. That AD also requires initial and
repetitive replacements of 2nd stage turbines on 1B, 1D, and 1D1
engines only. That condition, if not corrected, could result in
uncommanded in-flight engine shutdown.
Actions Since AD 2006-02-08R1 Was Issued
Since we issued that AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
informed us that they have received reports of additional failures of
the 2nd stage turbine blades. The debris from the failures was fully
contained. The failures were caused by:
[[Page 10623]]
Deterioration of 2nd stage nozzle guide vanes (NGV2)
modified to TU197,
Aerodynamic excitation from deteriorated NGV2,
Excessive temperature on the fir-tree roots, and
2nd stage turbine blades modified to TU204.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of Turbomeca
Alert Service Bulletins (ASBs) A292 72 0807, Update 1, dated October
26, 2006, for Arriel 1B post-TU 148; ASB A292 72 0809, dated October 4,
2005, for Arriel 1D and 1D1; and ASB A292 72 0810, for Arriel 1S1, all
dated March 24, 2004. These ASBs describe procedures for initial and
repetitive position checks of the 2nd stage turbine blades, and
replacement of 2nd stage turbines on 1B and 1D1 engines only. The EASA
classified these ASBs as mandatory and issued airworthiness directive
2007-0018, dated January 15, 2007, in order to ensure the airworthiness
of these Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft engines in
the European Union.
Bilateral Agreement Information
This engine model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
Section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. In keeping with this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the EASA, which is the airworthiness
authority for the European Union, kept us informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the findings of the EASA, reviewed
all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary
for products of this type design that are certificated for operation in
the United States.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would
require:
Initial and repetitive position checks of the 2nd stage
turbine blades on Turbomeca Arriel 1B, 1D, 1D1, and 1S1 turboshaft
engines.
Replacement of 2nd stage turbines on 1B and 1D1 engines
only.
Initially replacing 2nd stage turbines in Arriel 1B, 1D,
and 1D1 turboshaft engines.
The proposed AD would require that you do these actions using the
service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD revision would affect 721 engines
installed on helicopters of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
would take about 2 work-hours per engine to inspect all 721 engines and
40 work-hours per engine to replace about 587 2nd stage turbines on 1B
and 1D1 engines, and that the average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about $3,200 per engine. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the proposed AD revision to U.S.
operators to be $3,905,240.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14
CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14721 (71 FR
46390, August 14, 2006) and by adding a new airworthiness directive, to
read as follows:
Turbomeca: Docket No. FAA-2005-21242; Directorate Identifier 2005-
NE-09-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by May 8, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-02-08R1, Amendment 39-14721.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Turbomeca Arriel 1B engines fitted with
2nd stage turbine modification TU 148, and Arriel 1D, 1D1, and 1S1
engines. Arriel 1B engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Eurocopter France AS-350B and AS-350A ``Ecureuil'' helicopters.
Arriel 1D engines are installed on, but not limited to, Eurocopter
France AS-350B1 ``Ecureuil'' helicopters. Arriel 1D1 engines are
installed on, but not limited to, Eurocopter France AS-350B2
``Ecureuil'' helicopters. Arriel 1S1 engines are installed on, but
not limited to, Sikorsky Aircraft S-76A and S-76C helicopters.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of failures of second stage
blades. We are issuing this AD to prevent failures of the 2nd stage
turbine blades, which could result in uncommanded in-flight engine
shutdown, and subsequent forced autorotation landing or accident.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
[[Page 10624]]
Initial Relative Position Check of 2nd Stage Turbine Blades
(f) Do an initial relative position check of the 2nd stage
turbine blades using the Turbomeca mandatory alert service bulletins
(ASBs) specified in the following Table 1. Do the check before
reaching any of the intervals specified in Table 1 or within 50
hours time-in-service after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
Table 1.--Initial and Repetitive Relative Position Check Intervals of 2nd Stage Turbine Blade
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial relative
Turbomeca engine model position check Repetitive interval Mandatory alert service
interval bulletin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arriel 1B (modified per TU 148)...... Within 1,200 hours time- Within 200 hours time- A292 72 0807, Update 1,
since-new (TSN) or in-service-since-last- dated October 26,
time-since-overhaul relative-position- 2006.
(TSO) or 3,500 cycles- check (TSLRPC).
since-new (CSN) or
cycles-since-overhaul
(CSO), whichever
occurs earlier.
Arriel 1D1 and Arriel 1D............. Within 1,200 hours TSN Within 150 hours TSLRPC A292 72 0809, Update
or TSO or 3,500 hours No. 1, dated October
CSN or CSO, whichever 4, 2005.
occurs earlier.
Arriel 1S1........................... Within 1,200 hours TSN Within 150 hours TSLRPC A292 72 0810, dated
or TSO or 3,500 hours March 24, 2004.
CSN or CSO, whichever
occurs earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive Relative Position Check of 2nd Stage Turbine Blades
(g) Recheck the relative position of 2nd stage turbine blades at
the TSLRPC intervals specified in Table 1 of this AD, using the
mandatory ASBs indicated.
Credit for Previous Relative Position Checks
(h) Relative position checks of 2nd stage turbine blades done
using Turbomeca Service Bulletin A292 72 0263, Update 1, 2, 3, or 4,
or A292 72 0807, dated March 24, 2004, comply with the initial
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Initial Replacement of 2nd Stage Turbines on Arriel 1B, 1D, and 1D1
Engines
(i) Initially replace the 2nd stage turbine with a new or
overhauled 2nd stage turbine as follows:
(1) Before accumulating 1,500 hours TSN or TSO on the module for
Arriel 1D and 1D1 engines.
(2) Before accumulating 2,200 hours TSN or TSO on the module or
3,000 total hours TSN on the 2nd stage turbine blades, whichever
occurs first, for Arriel 1B engines.
Repetitive Replacements of 2nd Stage Turbines on Arriel 1B, 1D, and 1D1
Engines
(j) Thereafter, replace the 2nd stage turbine with a new or
overhauled 2nd stage turbine within every 1,500 hours TSN or TSO on
the module for Arriel 1D and 1D1 engines, and within every 2,200
hours TSN or TSO on the module or 3,000 total hours TSN on the 2nd
stage turbine blades, for Arriel 1B engines.
Criteria for Overhauled 2nd Stage Turbines
(k) Do the following to overhauled 2nd stage turbines,
referenced in paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD:
(1) You must install new blades in the 2nd stage turbines of
overhauled Arriel 1D and 1D1 engines.
(2) You may install either overhauled blades with fewer than
3,000 total hours TSN or new blades in the 2nd stage turbines of
overhauled Arriel 1B engines.
Relative Position Check Continuing Compliance Requirements
(l) All 2nd stage turbines, including those that are new or
overhauled, must continue to comply with relative position check
requirements of paragraphs (f) and (j) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(m) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(n) The EASA airworthiness directive 2007-0018, dated January
15, 2007, also addresses the subject of this AD.
(o) Contact Christopher Spinney, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
Christopher.spinney@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7175; fax (781)
238-7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 5, 2007.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-4244 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P