Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Missouri, 10613-10616 [E7-4176]
Download as PDF
10613
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 8, 2007. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this rule for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: February 27, 2007.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended
under Chapter 5 by revising the entry
for ‘‘10–5.300’’ to read as follows:
§ 52.1320 Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
I
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
10–5.300 ...................
*
*
*
Control of Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–4300 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA–R07–OAR–2007–0041; FRL–8284–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Missouri
erjones on PRODPC74 with RULES
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to
the Missouri State Implementation Plan
(SIP) and Operating Permits Program.
EPA is approving a revision to the
Missouri rule entitled ‘‘Submission of
15:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and
Process Information.’’ This revision will
ensure consistency between the state
and the Federally-approved rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective May 8, 2007, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by April 9, 2007. If adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take
effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2007–0041, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
ADDRESSES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
*
3/9/07 [insert FR page
number where the
document begins].
*
11/30/06
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to Amy Algoe-Eakin,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2007–
0041. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
10614
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PRODPC74 with RULES
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551–7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This section provides additional
information by addressing the following
questions:
What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a
SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state
regulation mean to me?
What is the Part 70 operating permits
program?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
What is the Federal approval process for an
operating permits program?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP
revision and Part 70 revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?
What is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) requires states to develop air
pollution regulations and control
strategies to ensure that state air quality
meets the national ambient air quality
standards established by EPA. These
ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they
currently address six criteria pollutants.
These pollutants are: Carbon monoxide,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to us
for approval and incorporation into the
Federally-enforceable SIP.
Each Federally-approved SIP protects
air quality primarily by addressing air
pollution at its point of origin. These
SIPs can be extensive, containing state
regulations or other enforceable
documents and supporting information
such as emission inventories,
monitoring networks, and modeling
demonstrations.
What is the Federal approval process
for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be
incorporated into the Federallyenforceable SIP, states must formally
adopt the regulations and control
strategies consistent with state and
Federal requirements. This process
generally includes a public notice,
public hearing, public comment period,
and a formal adoption by a stateauthorized rulemaking body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or
control strategy is adopted, the state
submits it to us for inclusion into the
SIP. We must provide public notice and
seek additional public comment
regarding the proposed Federal action
on the state submission. If adverse
comments are received, they must be
addressed prior to any final Federal
action by us.
All state regulations and supporting
information approved by EPA under
section 110 of the CAA are incorporated
into the Federally-approved SIP.
Records of such SIP actions are
maintained in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52,
entitled ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans.’’ The actual state
regulations which are approved are not
reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ‘‘incorporated by
reference,’’ which means that we have
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
approved a given state regulation with
a specific effective date.
What does Federal approval of a state
regulation mean to me?
Enforcement of the state regulation
before and after it is incorporated into
the Federally-approved SIP is primarily
a state responsibility. However, after the
regulation is Federally approved, we are
authorized to take enforcement action
against violators. Citizens are also
offered legal recourse to address
violations as described in section 304 of
the CAA.
What is the part 70 Operating Permits
Program?
The CAA Amendments of 1990
require all states to develop operating
permits programs that meet certain
Federal criteria. In implementing this
program, the states are to require certain
sources of air pollution to obtain
permits that contain all applicable
requirements under the CAA. One
purpose of the part 70 operating permits
program is to improve enforcement by
issuing each source a single permit that
consolidates all of the applicable CAA
requirements into a Federallyenforceable document. By consolidating
all of the applicable requirements for a
facility into one document, the source,
the public, and the permitting
authorities can more easily determine
what CAA requirements apply and how
compliance with those requirements is
determined.
Sources required to obtain an
operating permit under this program
include ‘‘major’’ sources of air pollution
and certain other sources specified in
the CAA or in our implementing
regulations. For example, all sources
regulated under the acid rain program,
regardless of size, must obtain permits.
Examples of major sources include
those that emit 100 tons per year or
more of volatile organic compounds,
carbon monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, or PM10; those that
emit 10 tons per year of any single
hazardous air pollutant (HAP)
(specifically listed under the CAA); or
those that emit 25 tons per year or more
of a combination of HAPs.
Revision to the state and local
agencies operating permits program are
also subject to public notice, comment,
and our approval.
What is the Federal approval process
for an operating permits program?
In order for state regulations to be
incorporated into the Federallyenforceable Title V operating permits
program, states must formally adopt
regulations consistent with state and
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Federal requirements. This process
generally includes a public notice,
public hearing, public comment period,
and a formal adoption by a stateauthorized rulemaking body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or
control strategy is adopted, the state
submits it to us for inclusion into the
approved operating permits program.
We must provide public notice and seek
additional public comment regarding
the proposed Federal action on the state
submission. If adverse comments are
received, they must be addressed prior
to any final Federal action by us.
All state regulations and supporting
information approved by EPA under
section 502 of the CAA are incorporated
into the Federally-approved operating
permits program. Records of such
actions are maintained in the CFR at
Title 40, part 70, appendix A, entitled
‘‘Approval Status of State and Local
Operating Permits Programs.’’
erjones on PRODPC74 with RULES
What is being addressed in this
document?
Missouri, in its letter of December 11,
2006, requested that EPA approve a
revision to the SIP and Operating
Permits Program to include revisions to
rule 10 CSR 10–6.110, ‘‘Submission of
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and
Process Information’’. This rule deals
with submittal of emissions
information, emission fees, and public
availability of emissions data. It
provides procedures for collection,
recording, and submittal of emissions
data and process information on statesupplied Emission Inventory
Questionnaire and Emission Statement
forms so that the state can calculate
emissions for the purpose of state air
resource planning.
By state statute and to meet EPA
requirements under the Title V program,
the emission fees are set annually to
fund the reasonable cost of
administering the program. The
Missouri Department of Natural
Resources (MDNR) continually
evaluates the Operating Permits
Program financial situation. Section
(3)(D)1. established the emissions fee of
$34.50 per ton of regulated air pollutant
starting for calendar year 2005 which
remains the fee for calendar year 2006.
This revision merely changes the text
from calendar year 2005 to 2006.
Subsection (3)(D)2.E. was revised to
change the due date for emission fees
from the previous year to be due on June
1 instead of April 1, for all Standard
Industrial Classifications.
Subsection (3)(D)2.F. was revised to
change the due date for Emission
Inventory Questionnaire forms from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
April 1 to June 1 for all Standard
Industrial Classifications.
The rule revisions do not change the
stringency of the SIP or Title V program
and the revisions otherwise meet the
EPA requirements for both programs.
Have the requirements for approval of
the SIP revision and Part 70 revision
been met?
The submittal satisfied the
completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V. In addition, the state
submittal has met the public notice
requirements for SIP submission in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.102 and met
the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA including section 110 and 40 CFR
51.211, relating to submission of
emissions data.
Finally, the submittal met the
substantive requirements of Title V of
the 1990 CAA Amendments and 40 CFR
part 70, including the requirement in 40
CFR 70.9 relating to emission fees.
What action is EPA taking?
We are approving revisions to the
Missouri SIP and incorporating the
revised rule 10 CSR 10–6.110,
‘‘Submission of Emissions Data,
Emission Fees, and Process
Information.’’
We are also approving sections
(3)(D)1, and (3)(D)2.E., and (3)(D)2.F. of
this rule as program revisions to the
state’s Part 70 Operating Permits
Program.
We are processing this action as a
direct final action because the revisions
make routine changes to the existing
rules which are noncontroversial, and
make regulatory revisions required by
state statute. Therefore, we do not
anticipate any adverse comments.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on part of this rule and if that
part can be severed from the remainder
of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those parts of the rule that are not the
subject of an adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10615
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it approves a
state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing SIP and Title V permit
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. In this context,
in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a
state submission for failure to use VCS.
It would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a state submission, to use VCS in place
of a state submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA.
Thus, the requirements of section 12(d)
of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
10616
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 8, 2007. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this rule for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
permits, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 27, 2007.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
List of Subjects
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
40 CFR Part 52
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
I
I
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended
under Chapter 6 by revising the entry
for ‘‘10–6.110’’ to read as follows:
I
40 CFR Part 70
§ 52.1320
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
10–6.110 ...................
*
*
*
Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees,
and Process Information.
*
*
*
12/30/06
*
*
*
3/9/07 [insert FR page
number where the
document begins].
*
PART 70—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for Part 70
continues to read as follows:
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process
Information’’ on December 11, 2006;
approval of sections (3)(D)1., (3)(D)2.E., and
(3)(D)2.F. effective May 8, 2007.
*
*
*
*
*
*
I
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–4176 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Appendix A—[Amended]
4. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended
by adding paragraph (u) under Missouri
to read as follows:
erjones on PRODPC74 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
15:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
42 CFR Part 121
SUMMARY: This Final Rule sets forth the
Secretary’s decision to include
intestines within the definition of
organs covered by the regulations
governing the operations of the Organ
Procurement and Transplantation
(u) The Missouri Department of Natural
Resources submitted revisions to Missouri
rule 10 CSR 10–6.110, ‘‘Submission of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
AGENCY:
Missouri
*
*
Organ Procurement and
Transplantation Network
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
*
*
RIN 0906AA62
I
*
*
Section (3)(D), Emissions Fees, has not
been approved as
part of the SIP.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10613-10616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4176]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA-R07-OAR-2007-0041; FRL-8284-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits Program. EPA is
approving a revision to the Missouri rule entitled ``Submission of
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information.'' This revision
will ensure consistency between the state and the Federally-approved
rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective May 8, 2007, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 9, 2007.
If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2007-0041, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Amy Algoe-
Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2007-0041. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail
[[Page 10614]]
information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours
in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551-7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing the following questions:
What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
What is the Part 70 operating permits program?
What is the Federal approval process for an operating permits
program?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision and Part 70
revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?
What is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop
air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state
air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards
established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria
pollutants. These pollutants are: Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to
us for approval and incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP.
Each Federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by
addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring
networks, and modeling demonstrations.
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the
Federally-enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations
and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements.
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public
comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking
body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the
state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide
public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed
Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are
received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by
us.
All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA
under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-
approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52, entitled ``Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations
which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we
have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date.
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we
are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens
are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in
section 304 of the CAA.
What is the part 70 Operating Permits Program?
The CAA Amendments of 1990 require all states to develop operating
permits programs that meet certain Federal criteria. In implementing
this program, the states are to require certain sources of air
pollution to obtain permits that contain all applicable requirements
under the CAA. One purpose of the part 70 operating permits program is
to improve enforcement by issuing each source a single permit that
consolidates all of the applicable CAA requirements into a Federally-
enforceable document. By consolidating all of the applicable
requirements for a facility into one document, the source, the public,
and the permitting authorities can more easily determine what CAA
requirements apply and how compliance with those requirements is
determined.
Sources required to obtain an operating permit under this program
include ``major'' sources of air pollution and certain other sources
specified in the CAA or in our implementing regulations. For example,
all sources regulated under the acid rain program, regardless of size,
must obtain permits. Examples of major sources include those that emit
100 tons per year or more of volatile organic compounds, carbon
monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, or PM10;
those that emit 10 tons per year of any single hazardous air pollutant
(HAP) (specifically listed under the CAA); or those that emit 25 tons
per year or more of a combination of HAPs.
Revision to the state and local agencies operating permits program
are also subject to public notice, comment, and our approval.
What is the Federal approval process for an operating permits program?
In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the
Federally-enforceable Title V operating permits program, states must
formally adopt regulations consistent with state and
[[Page 10615]]
Federal requirements. This process generally includes a public notice,
public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a
state-authorized rulemaking body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the
state submits it to us for inclusion into the approved operating
permits program. We must provide public notice and seek additional
public comment regarding the proposed Federal action on the state
submission. If adverse comments are received, they must be addressed
prior to any final Federal action by us.
All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA
under section 502 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-
approved operating permits program. Records of such actions are
maintained in the CFR at Title 40, part 70, appendix A, entitled
``Approval Status of State and Local Operating Permits Programs.''
What is being addressed in this document?
Missouri, in its letter of December 11, 2006, requested that EPA
approve a revision to the SIP and Operating Permits Program to include
revisions to rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Submission of Emission Data,
Emission Fees, and Process Information''. This rule deals with
submittal of emissions information, emission fees, and public
availability of emissions data. It provides procedures for collection,
recording, and submittal of emissions data and process information on
state-supplied Emission Inventory Questionnaire and Emission Statement
forms so that the state can calculate emissions for the purpose of
state air resource planning.
By state statute and to meet EPA requirements under the Title V
program, the emission fees are set annually to fund the reasonable cost
of administering the program. The Missouri Department of Natural
Resources (MDNR) continually evaluates the Operating Permits Program
financial situation. Section (3)(D)1. established the emissions fee of
$34.50 per ton of regulated air pollutant starting for calendar year
2005 which remains the fee for calendar year 2006. This revision merely
changes the text from calendar year 2005 to 2006.
Subsection (3)(D)2.E. was revised to change the due date for
emission fees from the previous year to be due on June 1 instead of
April 1, for all Standard Industrial Classifications.
Subsection (3)(D)2.F. was revised to change the due date for
Emission Inventory Questionnaire forms from April 1 to June 1 for all
Standard Industrial Classifications.
The rule revisions do not change the stringency of the SIP or Title
V program and the revisions otherwise meet the EPA requirements for
both programs.
Have the requirements for approval of the SIP revision and Part 70
revision been met?
The submittal satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, the state submittal has met the public
notice requirements for SIP submission in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102
and met the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA including section
110 and 40 CFR 51.211, relating to submission of emissions data.
Finally, the submittal met the substantive requirements of Title V
of the 1990 CAA Amendments and 40 CFR part 70, including the
requirement in 40 CFR 70.9 relating to emission fees.
What action is EPA taking?
We are approving revisions to the Missouri SIP and incorporating
the revised rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Submission of Emissions Data,
Emission Fees, and Process Information.''
We are also approving sections (3)(D)1, and (3)(D)2.E., and
(3)(D)2.F. of this rule as program revisions to the state's Part 70
Operating Permits Program.
We are processing this action as a direct final action because the
revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are
noncontroversial, and make regulatory revisions required by state
statute. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please
note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if
that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP and Title V permit submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a state submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus
be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a state submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
[[Page 10616]]
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take
effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report,
which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in
the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 8, 2007. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 70
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 27, 2007.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320(c) the table is amended under Chapter 6 by revising
the entry for ``10-6.110'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-6.110...................... Submission of Emission 12/30/06 3/9/07 [insert FR Section (3)(D),
Data, Emission Fees, page number where Emissions Fees,
and Process Information. the document has not been
begins]. approved as part
of the SIP.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 70--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for Part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Appendix A--[Amended]
0
4. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (u) under
Missouri to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
* * * * *
Missouri
* * * * *
(u) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Submission of Emission
Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information'' on December 11, 2006;
approval of sections (3)(D)1., (3)(D)2.E., and (3)(D)2.F. effective
May 8, 2007.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-4176 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P