Maryland Regulatory Program, 10433-10436 [E7-4147]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Within the next 100 flight hours or 3
months, whichever occurs first, after the
effective date of this AD, and thereafter
repetitively during a period not to exceed 12
months, inspect the aileron brackets and
bearings and perform the lubrication of the
aileron bearings in accordance with REIMS
AVIATION INDUSTRIES Service Bulletin
No. F406–59, dated October 24, 2005.
(2) If corrosion is found during any
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD, before further flight, replace the
damaged parts in accordance with REIMS
AVIATION INDUSTRIES Service Bulletin
No. F406–59, dated October 24, 2005.
Note 1: We established the repetitive
inspection times of this AD so that they may
coincide with annual inspections.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff,
FAA, ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4144; fax: (816)
329–4090, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 358
[Docket No. RM07–1–000]
Standards of Conduct for
Transmission Providers; Notice of
Extension of Time
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission; DOE.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking;
extension of comment period.
Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: We
added repetitive inspection requirements in
this proposed AD to coincide with the
maintenance requirement in the service
bulletin.
Related Information
´ ´
(h) Refer to Direction generale de l’aviation
civile AD No F–2005–177, dated November
9, 2005; and REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES
Service Bulletin No F406–59, dated October
24, 2005, for related information.
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
AGENCY:
FAA AD Differences
19:28 Mar 07, 2007
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
February 28, 2007.
Note 2: We encourage you to put Reims
temporary revision No. 6 into the
maintenance program of the F406 airplane
(chapter 5 of the maintenance manual).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
1, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–4131 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: On February 28, 2007, the
Commission issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking proposing permanent
regulations regarding the standards of
conduct consistent with the decision of
the United States Court of Appeals of
the District of Columbia in National
Fuel Gas Supply Corporation v. FERC,
468 F.3d 831 (2006), regarding natural
gas pipelines. The Commission is
extending the comment period on the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at the
request of the American Gas
Association, the American Public Power
Association, the Edison Electric
Institute, the Electric Power Supply
Association, the Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America, the Large
Public Power Council and the Natural
Rural Electric Cooperative Association.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before March 30, 2007. Reply comments
must be filed on or before April 30,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eric Ciccoretti, Office of Enforcement,
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Telephone:
(202) 502–8493, E-mail:
eric.ciccoretti@ferc.gov.
Deme Anas, Office of Enforcement,
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Telephone:
(202) 502–8178, E-mail:
demetra.anas@ferc.gov.
Stuart Fischer, Office of Enforcement,
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Telephone:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10433
(202) 502–8517, E-mail:
stuart.fischer@ferc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice Extending Comment and Reply
Comment Period
On February 27, 2007, the American
Gas Association, the American Public
Power Association, the Edison Electric
Institute, the Electric Power Supply
Association, the Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America, the Large
Public Power Council, and the National
Rural Electric Cooperative Association,
filed jointly for an extension of time to
file comments and reply comments in
response to the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking issued January
18, 2007 in the above-captioned
proceeding. Standards of Conduct for
Transmission Providers, 118 FERC
¶ 61,031, 72 FR 3958 (Jan. 29, 2007),
FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,611 (2007).
Upon consideration, the date for filing
comments in this proceeding is
extended to and including March 30,
2007 and the date for filing reply
comments is extended to and including
April 30, 2007.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–4117 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 920
[MD–055–FOR]
Maryland Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Maryland
regulatory program (the Maryland
program) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). The program
amendment consists of changes to the
Maryland Annotated Code (MAC) to
increase the end of month balance cap
of the Bond Supplement Reserve
(Reserve) within the Bituminous Coal
Open-Pit Mining Reclamation Fund.
Maryland submitted these proposed
amendments on its own initiative to
improve the ability of the Maryland
Department of the Environment to
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
10434
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
finance reclamation projects by
increasing the amounts available in the
Reserve.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m. (local time), on April 9, 2007. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on April 2, 2007. We
will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m. (local time), on
March 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘MD–055–FOR,’’ by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov. Include
‘‘MD–055–FOR’’ in the subject line of
the message;
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. George
Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 415 Market Street,
Room 304, Harrisburg, PA 17101;
Telephone: (717) 782–4849 ext. 11;
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
‘‘MD–055–FOR’’ for this rulemaking.
For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ Section
in this document. You may also request
to speak at a public hearing by any of
the methods listed above or by
contacting the individual listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
Maryland program, this submission, a
listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in
response to this document at the
addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may also
receive one free copy of the submission
by contacting OSM’s Pittsburgh Field
Division Office.
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 415
Market Street, Room 304, Harrisburg,
PA 17101, Telephone: (717) 782–4849
ext. 11. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
Mr. C. Edmon Larrimore, Program
Manager, Mining Program, Maryland
Department of the Environment,1800
Washington Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230, Telephone: (410) 537–
3557 or 1–800–633–6101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
George Rieger, Telephone: (717) 782–
4849 ext. 11. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Maryland Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:51 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Maryland
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘* * *a
State law which provides for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations in accordance
with the requirements of the Act* * *;
and rules and regulations consistent
with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to the Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Maryland
program on December 1, 1980. You can
find background information on the
Maryland program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
in the December 1, 1980, Federal
Register (45 FR 79431). You can also
find later actions concerning Maryland’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 920.12, 920.15, and 920.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By an undated letter received on
January 29, 2007 (Administrative
Record Number MD–587–00), Maryland
sent us an amendment to revise its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.). The amendment revises MAC
provisions to increase the end of month
balance cap of the Bond Supplement
Reserve within the Bituminous Coal
Open-Pit Mining Reclamation Fund.
Maryland submitted these proposed
amendments on its own initiative to
improve the ability of the Maryland
Department of the Environment to
finance reclamation projects by
increasing the amounts available in the
Reserve.
In its submittal of this amendment,
Maryland stated that this action will
improve the ability of the Maryland
Department of the Environment to
finance reclamation projects by
increasing the amounts available in the
Reserve. It also addresses findings and
recommendations found in the
Actuarial Study approved by OSM in
the Federal Register dated May 13, 1998
(63 FR 26451).
This Bond Supplement Reserve Fund
was established for reclamation
purposes when the original bond is not
sufficient to reclaim the site for which
it was posted in the event of forfeiture.
A surcharge is assessed for each ton of
coal removed by the open-pit or strip
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
method. Part of that surcharge is
deposited into the Bituminous Coal
Open-Pit Mining Reclamation Fund and
another part is remitted to the county.
These funds are used to supplement
forfeited bonds to enable the mine site
to be reclaimed. An additional
surcharge for each ton is assessed and
credited to the county in which the
mining is occurring.
A summary of the proposed changes
follows:
1. MAC 15–517(c)
Subsection (c) provides as follows:
(c) When the amount of money in the bond
supplement reserve equals or exceeds
$300,000 at the end of the month, deposits
into the reserve of the amounts provided in
subsection (b)(1) and (2) of this section shall
end temporarily.
Maryland proposes to revise
Subsection (c) by increasing the end-ofmonth balance cap of the Bond
Supplement Reserve Fund from
$300,000 to $750,000.
As amended, Subsection (c) provides
as follows:
(c) When the amount of money in the bond
supplement reserve equals or exceeds
$750,000 at the end of the month, deposits
into the reserve of the amounts provided in
subsection (b)(1) and (2) of this section shall
end temporarily.
2. MAC 15–517(d)(1)
Subsection (d)(1) provides as follows:
(1) The amount of money in the bond
supplement reserve equals or exceeds
$300,000 at the end of the month;
Maryland proposes to raise the endof-month balance cap of the Bond
Supplement Reserve Fund from
$300,000 to $750,000.
As amended, Subsection (d)(1)
provides as follows:
(1) The amount of money in the bond
supplement reserve equals or exceeds
$750,000 at the end of the month;
3. MAC 15–517(e)
Subsection (e) reads as follows:
(e) At the end of any month when the
amount of money in the bond supplement
reserve is reduced below $200,000:
Maryland proposes to raise the
amount from $200,000 to $500,000
because the end-of-month balance cap
that triggers the resumption of
surcharges and deposits needed to be
increased as well.
As amended, Subsection (e) provides
as follows:
(e) At the end of any month when the
amount of money in the bond supplement
reserve is reduced below $500,000:
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Maryland program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your written comments should
be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We may not consider
or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
administrative record, but comments
delivered to an address other than the
Pittsburgh Field Division Office may not
be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as
an ASCII or Word file avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of
encryption. Please also include ‘‘Attn:
MD–055–FOR’’ and your name and
return address in your Internet message.
If you do not receive a confirmation that
we have received your Internet message,
contact the Pittsburgh Field Division
Office at (717) 782–4849 ext. 11.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
4 p.m. (local time), on March 23, 2007.
If you are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:51 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings will be
open to the public and, if possible, we
will post notices of meetings at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. We
will make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the Administrative
Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10435
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is our
decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
regulation involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
Considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
10436
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
Dated: February 13, 2007.
H. Vann Weaver,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. E7–4147 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Regulatory Flexibility Act
32 CFR Part 903
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
[Docket No. USAF–2007–0001]
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the
analysis performed under various laws
and executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the analysis performed under various
laws and executive orders for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 920
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:28 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
Department of the Air Force
RIN 0701–AA72
Air Force Academy Preparatory School
DoD, USAF.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule tells how
to apply for the Air Force Academy
Preparatory School. It also explains the
procedures for selection, disenrollment,
and assignment. This rule has been
updated to identify USAFA’s revised
mission statement, new selection
criteria and updates of associated Air
Force Instructions.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments on or before May 7,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Scotty Ashley at (703) 695–3594,
scotty.Ashley@pentagon.af.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 903 is not a significant regulatory
action. This rule does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
state, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of the recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Sec.
202, Pub. L. 104–4)
It has been certified the 32 CFR part
903 does not contain a Federal Mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been determined that this rule
is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule * * *
Public Law 95–511, Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
903 does not impose any reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
903 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. This rule does not have
substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the
National Government and the States; or
(3) The distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 903
Military academy; military personnel.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in
the preamble, 32 CFR part 903 is
proposed to be revised to read as
follows:
PART 903—AIR FORCE ACADEMY
PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Sec.
903.1
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
Mission.
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10433-10436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4147]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 920
[MD-055-FOR]
Maryland Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Maryland regulatory program (the Maryland program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The
program amendment consists of changes to the Maryland Annotated Code
(MAC) to increase the end of month balance cap of the Bond Supplement
Reserve (Reserve) within the Bituminous Coal Open-Pit Mining
Reclamation Fund. Maryland submitted these proposed amendments on its
own initiative to improve the ability of the Maryland Department of the
Environment to
[[Page 10434]]
finance reclamation projects by increasing the amounts available in the
Reserve.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.
(local time), on April 9, 2007. If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the amendment on April 2, 2007. We will accept requests to
speak at a hearing until 4 p.m. (local time), on March 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``MD-055-FOR,'' by
any of the following methods:
E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov. Include ``MD-055-FOR'' in the
subject line of the message;
Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
415 Market Street, Room 304, Harrisburg, PA 17101; Telephone: (717)
782-4849 ext. 11;
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
docket number ``MD-055-FOR'' for this rulemaking. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' Section in
this document. You may also request to speak at a public hearing by any
of the methods listed above or by contacting the individual listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the Maryland program, this
submission, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this document at the addresses listed
below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may also receive one free copy of the submission by
contacting OSM's Pittsburgh Field Division Office.
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 415 Market Street, Room
304, Harrisburg, PA 17101, Telephone: (717) 782-4849 ext. 11. E-mail:
grieger@osmre.gov.
Mr. C. Edmon Larrimore, Program Manager, Mining Program, Maryland
Department of the Environment,1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230, Telephone: (410) 537-3557 or 1-800-633-6101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Rieger, Telephone: (717)
782-4849 ext. 11. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Maryland Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Maryland Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``* * *a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of the Act* * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to the Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Maryland program on December 1, 1980. You
can find background information on the Maryland program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval in the December 1, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 79431). You
can also find later actions concerning Maryland's program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 920.12, 920.15, and 920.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By an undated letter received on January 29, 2007 (Administrative
Record Number MD-587-00), Maryland sent us an amendment to revise its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). The amendment revises MAC
provisions to increase the end of month balance cap of the Bond
Supplement Reserve within the Bituminous Coal Open-Pit Mining
Reclamation Fund. Maryland submitted these proposed amendments on its
own initiative to improve the ability of the Maryland Department of the
Environment to finance reclamation projects by increasing the amounts
available in the Reserve.
In its submittal of this amendment, Maryland stated that this
action will improve the ability of the Maryland Department of the
Environment to finance reclamation projects by increasing the amounts
available in the Reserve. It also addresses findings and
recommendations found in the Actuarial Study approved by OSM in the
Federal Register dated May 13, 1998 (63 FR 26451).
This Bond Supplement Reserve Fund was established for reclamation
purposes when the original bond is not sufficient to reclaim the site
for which it was posted in the event of forfeiture. A surcharge is
assessed for each ton of coal removed by the open-pit or strip method.
Part of that surcharge is deposited into the Bituminous Coal Open-Pit
Mining Reclamation Fund and another part is remitted to the county.
These funds are used to supplement forfeited bonds to enable the mine
site to be reclaimed. An additional surcharge for each ton is assessed
and credited to the county in which the mining is occurring.
A summary of the proposed changes follows:
1. MAC 15-517(c)
Subsection (c) provides as follows:
(c) When the amount of money in the bond supplement reserve
equals or exceeds $300,000 at the end of the month, deposits into
the reserve of the amounts provided in subsection (b)(1) and (2) of
this section shall end temporarily.
Maryland proposes to revise Subsection (c) by increasing the end-
of-month balance cap of the Bond Supplement Reserve Fund from $300,000
to $750,000.
As amended, Subsection (c) provides as follows:
(c) When the amount of money in the bond supplement reserve
equals or exceeds $750,000 at the end of the month, deposits into
the reserve of the amounts provided in subsection (b)(1) and (2) of
this section shall end temporarily.
2. MAC 15-517(d)(1)
Subsection (d)(1) provides as follows:
(1) The amount of money in the bond supplement reserve equals or
exceeds $300,000 at the end of the month;
Maryland proposes to raise the end-of-month balance cap of the Bond
Supplement Reserve Fund from $300,000 to $750,000.
As amended, Subsection (d)(1) provides as follows:
(1) The amount of money in the bond supplement reserve equals or
exceeds $750,000 at the end of the month;
3. MAC 15-517(e)
Subsection (e) reads as follows:
(e) At the end of any month when the amount of money in the bond
supplement reserve is reduced below $200,000:
Maryland proposes to raise the amount from $200,000 to $500,000
because the end-of-month balance cap that triggers the resumption of
surcharges and deposits needed to be increased as well.
As amended, Subsection (e) provides as follows:
(e) At the end of any month when the amount of money in the bond
supplement reserve is reduced below $500,000:
[[Page 10435]]
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Maryland program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We may not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final rule if they are received after the
close of the comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt to
log all comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered
to an address other than the Pittsburgh Field Division Office may not
be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII or Word file avoiding
the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also
include ``Attn: MD-055-FOR'' and your name and return address in your
Internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation that we have
received your Internet message, contact the Pittsburgh Field Division
Office at (717) 782-4849 ext. 11.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m. (local time), on
March 23, 2007. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to
attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
will be open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is our decision is on a State
regulatory program and does not involve a Federal regulation involving
Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) Considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute
[[Page 10436]]
major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 920
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 13, 2007.
H. Vann Weaver,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. E7-4147 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P