Notice of Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the Copper Mountain College Habitat Conservation Plan, San Bernardino, CA, 10551-10552 [E7-4138]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of an
Environmental Assessment and
Receipt of an Application for an
Incidental Take Permit for the Copper
Mountain College Habitat Conservation
Plan, San Bernardino, CA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Copper Mountain
Community College District (District)
has applied to the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service or ‘‘we’’) for an
incidental take permit pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
We are considering issuing a 16-year
permit to the District that would
authorize take of the federally
threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus
agassizii) incidental to otherwise lawful
activities associated with the expansion
of their existing campus onto 71.57
acres of their 156.53-acre property.
We are requesting comments on the
permit application, Habitat
Conservation Plan (Plan),
Environmental Assessment (EA), and
Implementing Agreement (IA). The
District’s Plan describes the mitigation
and minimization measures they would
implement, as required in Section
10(a)(2)(B) of the Act, to address the
effects of the project on the desert
tortoise (see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION). The EA describes the
project’s impacts on the human
environment and analyzes the
significance of those impacts. The IA
describes the roles and responsibilities
of District, the Service, and Joshua Tree
National Park (Park) in implementation
of the Plan. The draft Plan, EA, and IA
are available for public review.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before May 7, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please address written
comments to Diane K. Noda, Field
Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service,
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493
Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura,
California 93003. You may also send
comments by facsimile to 805–644–
3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Croft, Fish and Wildlife Biologist,
(see ADDRESSES) telephone: 805–644–
1766, extension 302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of these
documents for review by contacting the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:53 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
office under ADDRESSES. Documents also
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at our Ventura office (see
ADDRESSES) and at the Joshua Tree
Public Library. The address for the
Joshua Tree Public Library is 6465 Park
Blvd., Joshua Tree, California 92252.
These documents are also available on
the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office
internet site: https://www.fws.gov/
ventura.
Background
Section 9 of the Act and Federal
regulations prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of fish or
wildlife species listed as endangered or
threatened, respectively. Take of listed
fish or wildlife is defined under the Act
to mean to harass, harm, pursue, hunt,
shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or
collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct. However, the Service,
under limited circumstances, may issue
permits to cover incidental take, (i.e.,
take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, the carrying out of an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations
governing incidental take permits for
threatened and endangered species are
found at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22,
respectively. Among other criteria,
issuance of such permits must not
jeopardize the existence of federally
listed fish, wildlife, or plants.
The proposed Copper Mountain
College Expansion Project is 156.53
acres in the unincorporated community
of Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County,
California. The District proposes to
expand the Copper Mountain
Community College campus from the
existing 8.59 acres onto 71.57 acres that
it owns in adjacent areas. It would begin
the phased construction with a solar
field immediately after permit issuance,
followed by a multi-use sports complex,
various roads, and a parking area in
2007. During the next 12 years, the
District would construct additional
parking lots, new sports fields,
additional classroom facilities, and
other buildings on the remaining
portions of the 71.57-acre site.
The District proposes to implement
measures to minimize adverse effects to
the desert tortoise during construction
and operation of these facilities,
additional measures to mitigate adverse
effects, and post-construction measures
to minimize indirect effects from
ongoing use of the new facilities. To
minimize adverse effects to the desert
tortoise and its habitat, the District
would provide on-site biological
monitoring during construction,
perform pre-project clearance surveys,
conduct a desert tortoise education
program for project personnel, and use
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10551
desert tortoise exclusion fencing to
prevent desert tortoises from entering
work areas. In addition, the District
would meet a schedule of reporting
requirements and appoint a field contact
representative to oversee compliance.
After permit issuance, the District
would also establish an 84.96-acre
desert tortoise translocation area
(Translocation Area) on land that it
owns immediately adjacent to the 71.57acre project site. The District would
manage this Translocation Area as a
habitat preserve and fund the
maintenance and monitoring of the
desert tortoises that are translocated
there during Project Site development.
To mitigate adverse effects, the
District would purchase an 80-acre
private in-holding in the Thermal
Canyon area of Joshua Tree National
Park. The District would transfer this
parcel to Joshua Tree National Park and
provide funds to assure adequate
management for desert tortoise
conservation on the 80-acre site. The
District would also implement one of
the following mitigation measures
within 12 months following permit
issuance: (1) Provide funding to a
designated management entity for the
improved management of desert tortoise
habitat on a 605-acre desert park near
Coyote Hole Spring or (2) provide
funding to the Desert Tortoise Preserve
Committee for the acquisition and
management of 30-acres of desert
tortoise habitat at the Desert Tortoise
Natural Area. The District is providing
this additional mitigation because
habitat on the 80-acre Thermal Canyon
parcel is of lower quality than habitat
the District would disturb on the project
site.
The EA considers the environmental
consequences of two alternatives,
including: (1) The No Action
Alternative, which consists of no
campus expansion, no mitigation, and
no permit issuance and (2) the Project
Development Alternative to the taking,
which consists of the development of
the project site and implementation of
the minimization and mitigation
measures described in the previous
paragraphs. Under the Project
Development Alternative, a third party
would be selected to work as the
District’s agent under their incidental
take permit within 12 months of initial
permit issuance. This would cover the
third party for take during management
of some mitigation lands described in
the Plan.
Public Review and Comment
We are providing this notice pursuant
to section 10(a) of the Act and the
regulations of the National
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
10552
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (40 CFR 1506.6). All comments
that we receive, including names and
addresses, will become part of the
official administrative record and may
be made available to the public. We will
evaluate the application, associated
documents, and comments submitted
thereon to determine whether the
application meets the requirements of
NEPA regulations and section 10(a) of
the Act. If we determine that those
requirements are met, we will issue a
permit to the District for the incidental
take of desert tortoises. We will make
our final permit decision no sooner than
60 days from the date of this notice.
If you wish to comment on the permit
application, draft EA, Plan, or IA you
may submit your comments to the
address listed in the ADDRESSES section
of this document. Our practice is to
make comments, including names,
home addresses, etc., of respondents
available for public review. Individual
respondents may request that we
withhold their names and/or home
addresses, etc., but if you wish us to
consider withholding this information,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comments. In
addition, you must provide a rationale
demonstrating and documenting that
disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. In the
absence of exceptional, documented
circumstances, we will release this
information. All submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, are
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
Dated: March 2, 2007.
Polly Wheeler,
Acting Deputy Manager, California/Nevada
Operations Office, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E7–4138 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Notice Terminating the Exclusion of
Indian Allotted Leases in the Uintah
and Ouray Reservation From Valuation
Under 30 CFR 206.172
Minerals Management Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Minerals Management
Service (MMS) with Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA) concurrence is terminating
the exclusion from valuation under the
rules at 30 CFR 206.172 for gas
produced from the Ute allotted leases in
the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
(Reservation), Utah. The final rule was
published in the Federal Register on
August 10, 1999 (64 FR 43506).
DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Barder, Manager, San Juan Basin
Region, Indian Oil and Gas Compliance
and Asset Management, Minerals
Revenue Management, Minerals
Management Service, P.O. Box 25165,
MS 396B2, Denver, CO 80225–0165,
telephone number (303) 231–3702, fax
number (303) 231–3755, e-mail
john.barder@mms.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MMS
published in the Federal Register on
August 10, 1999 (64 FR 43506), a final
rule titled ‘‘Amendments to Gas
Valuation Regulations for Indian
Leases’’ with an effective date of January
1, 2000. Indian leases in the Reservation
were excluded from index-based
valuation (§ 206.172). This exclusion
was based on the results of a cost benefit
analysis MMS performed in 1999. In the
1999 cost benefit analysis, MMS
estimated individual Indian mineral
owners would receive more revenue
under the non-index-based valuation
methodology (§ 206.174) than under the
index-based valuation methodology
(§ 206.172).
Effective January 2000, MMS has
valued gas production from the
Reservation under the non-index-based
valuation methodology at § 206.174.
However, MMS recently performed a
cost benefit analysis for calendar years
2004 through 2005 and estimated that
revenues using the index-based
valuation formula at § 206.172 exceed
the estimated revenues using the nonindex-based valuation method at
§ 206.174. Therefore, as required under
§ 206.172(g), MMS received written
concurrence from BIA to terminate the
exclusion from index-based valuation of
gas production from Indian allotted
leases in the Reservation.
As a result, gas production from Ute
allotted leases in the Reservation must
be valued under the index-based
valuation method (§ 206.172), beginning
with production on the first day of the
second month following the date MMS
publishes notice of its decision in the
Federal Register. Lessees must value gas
production from Ute allotted leases in
the Reservation on the index-based
valuation formula at § 206.172(d) using
MMS-approved publications and
indexes for the Central Rocky Mountain
Index Zone to determine the index zone
price; or lessees may obtain the indexbased values from the MRM Internet
Web site at: https://www.mrm.mms.gov.
Approved publications and index
pricing points for the Central Rocky
Mountain Index Zone are shown in the
following table:
APPROVED PUBLICATIONS AND INDEX PRICING POINTS FOR THE CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDEX ZONE
MMS-approved publications
Platts gas
daily price
guide
NGI’s
bidweek
survey
Central Rocky Mountains ...................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Index zone
X
X
X
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:53 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Index-pricing points
Kern River Gas Trans. Co. for Wyoming.
Northwest Pipeline Corp. for Rocky Mountains.
Questar Pipeline Co. for Rocky Mountains.
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. for Rocky Mountains.
Rocky Mountains
• CIG.
• Questar.
• Kern River.
• Northwest Domestic.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10551-10552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4138]
[[Page 10551]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Receipt
of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the Copper Mountain
College Habitat Conservation Plan, San Bernardino, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copper Mountain Community College District (District) has
applied to the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or ``we'') for an
incidental take permit pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We are considering
issuing a 16-year permit to the District that would authorize take of
the federally threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii)
incidental to otherwise lawful activities associated with the expansion
of their existing campus onto 71.57 acres of their 156.53-acre
property.
We are requesting comments on the permit application, Habitat
Conservation Plan (Plan), Environmental Assessment (EA), and
Implementing Agreement (IA). The District's Plan describes the
mitigation and minimization measures they would implement, as required
in Section 10(a)(2)(B) of the Act, to address the effects of the
project on the desert tortoise (see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). The EA
describes the project's impacts on the human environment and analyzes
the significance of those impacts. The IA describes the roles and
responsibilities of District, the Service, and Joshua Tree National
Park (Park) in implementation of the Plan. The draft Plan, EA, and IA
are available for public review.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 7, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please address written comments to Diane K. Noda, Field
Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, California 93003. You may
also send comments by facsimile to 805-644-3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Croft, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, (see ADDRESSES) telephone: 805-644-1766, extension 302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of these documents for review by contacting
the office under ADDRESSES. Documents also will be available for public
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at our Ventura
office (see ADDRESSES) and at the Joshua Tree Public Library. The
address for the Joshua Tree Public Library is 6465 Park Blvd., Joshua
Tree, California 92252. These documents are also available on the
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office internet site: https://www.fws.gov/
ventura.
Background
Section 9 of the Act and Federal regulations prohibit the ``take''
of fish or wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened,
respectively. Take of listed fish or wildlife is defined under the Act
to mean to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.
However, the Service, under limited circumstances, may issue permits to
cover incidental take, (i.e., take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity.
Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and
endangered species are found at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively.
Among other criteria, issuance of such permits must not jeopardize the
existence of federally listed fish, wildlife, or plants.
The proposed Copper Mountain College Expansion Project is 156.53
acres in the unincorporated community of Joshua Tree, San Bernardino
County, California. The District proposes to expand the Copper Mountain
Community College campus from the existing 8.59 acres onto 71.57 acres
that it owns in adjacent areas. It would begin the phased construction
with a solar field immediately after permit issuance, followed by a
multi-use sports complex, various roads, and a parking area in 2007.
During the next 12 years, the District would construct additional
parking lots, new sports fields, additional classroom facilities, and
other buildings on the remaining portions of the 71.57-acre site.
The District proposes to implement measures to minimize adverse
effects to the desert tortoise during construction and operation of
these facilities, additional measures to mitigate adverse effects, and
post-construction measures to minimize indirect effects from ongoing
use of the new facilities. To minimize adverse effects to the desert
tortoise and its habitat, the District would provide on-site biological
monitoring during construction, perform pre-project clearance surveys,
conduct a desert tortoise education program for project personnel, and
use desert tortoise exclusion fencing to prevent desert tortoises from
entering work areas. In addition, the District would meet a schedule of
reporting requirements and appoint a field contact representative to
oversee compliance.
After permit issuance, the District would also establish an 84.96-
acre desert tortoise translocation area (Translocation Area) on land
that it owns immediately adjacent to the 71.57-acre project site. The
District would manage this Translocation Area as a habitat preserve and
fund the maintenance and monitoring of the desert tortoises that are
translocated there during Project Site development.
To mitigate adverse effects, the District would purchase an 80-acre
private in-holding in the Thermal Canyon area of Joshua Tree National
Park. The District would transfer this parcel to Joshua Tree National
Park and provide funds to assure adequate management for desert
tortoise conservation on the 80-acre site. The District would also
implement one of the following mitigation measures within 12 months
following permit issuance: (1) Provide funding to a designated
management entity for the improved management of desert tortoise
habitat on a 605-acre desert park near Coyote Hole Spring or (2)
provide funding to the Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee for the
acquisition and management of 30-acres of desert tortoise habitat at
the Desert Tortoise Natural Area. The District is providing this
additional mitigation because habitat on the 80-acre Thermal Canyon
parcel is of lower quality than habitat the District would disturb on
the project site.
The EA considers the environmental consequences of two
alternatives, including: (1) The No Action Alternative, which consists
of no campus expansion, no mitigation, and no permit issuance and (2)
the Project Development Alternative to the taking, which consists of
the development of the project site and implementation of the
minimization and mitigation measures described in the previous
paragraphs. Under the Project Development Alternative, a third party
would be selected to work as the District's agent under their
incidental take permit within 12 months of initial permit issuance.
This would cover the third party for take during management of some
mitigation lands described in the Plan.
Public Review and Comment
We are providing this notice pursuant to section 10(a) of the Act
and the regulations of the National
[[Page 10552]]
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (40 CFR 1506.6). All comments
that we receive, including names and addresses, will become part of the
official administrative record and may be made available to the public.
We will evaluate the application, associated documents, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of NEPA regulations and section 10(a) of the Act. If we
determine that those requirements are met, we will issue a permit to
the District for the incidental take of desert tortoises. We will make
our final permit decision no sooner than 60 days from the date of this
notice.
If you wish to comment on the permit application, draft EA, Plan,
or IA you may submit your comments to the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. Our practice is to make comments,
including names, home addresses, etc., of respondents available for
public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their names and/or home addresses, etc., but if you wish us to consider
withholding this information, you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comments. In addition, you must provide a rationale
demonstrating and documenting that disclosure would constitute a
clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. In the absence of exceptional,
documented circumstances, we will release this information. All
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, are available for public inspection in their entirety.
Dated: March 2, 2007.
Polly Wheeler,
Acting Deputy Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. E7-4138 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P