Safety Zone; Fireworks, Lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, 10443-10445 [E7-4114]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(4) James River Anchorages. (i)
Anchorage I, Newport News. The waters
bounded by a line connecting the
following points:
Latitude
36°57′07.2″
36°56′23.1″
36°57′54.2″
36°56′03.5″
36°58′23.5″
36°58′49.0″
36°58′35.9″
36°57′52.2″
36°57′31.1″
Longitude
76°24′43.1″
76°24′26.8″
76°26′40.3″
76°24′35.8″
76°27′09.8″
76°27′09.8″
76°26′37.2″
76°26′01.6″
76°25′33.3″
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(ii) Anchorage Berth I–1. The waters
bounded by the arc of a circle with a
radius of 400 yards and the center
located at:
Latitude
36°57′09.0″ N
*
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Request for Comments
*
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [COTP San Diego 07–
025], indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Dated: February 14, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–4113 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP San Diego 07–025]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks, Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV
Public Meeting
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Chief Petty Officer Eric Carroll,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, CA, at
telephone (619) 278–7277.
Longitude
76°25′20.4″ W
*
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, in
support of a fireworks display near the
AVI Resort and Casino. The safety zone
is necessary to provide for the safety of
the crew, spectators, participants of the
event, participating vessels and other
vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
April 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Marine Events,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive,
San Diego, CA 92101–1028. Marine
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Events, Prevention Department,
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
Coast Guard Sector San Diego between
8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
18:51 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard
Sector San Diego at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would
be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, in
support of a fireworks show in the
navigation channel of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV. The
fireworks show is being sponsored by
AVI Resort and Casino. The safety zone
will be set at a 980-foot radius around
the anchored firing barge. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the show’s
crew, spectators, participants of the
event, participating vessels, and other
vessels and users of the waterway.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10443
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The event involves one anchored
barge, which will be used as a platform
for launching of fireworks. The safety
zone is required because the barge’s
planned firing location is in the
navigation channel. This safety zone
would be enforced from 8 p.m. through
9:45 p.m. on May 27, 2007.
The limits of this temporary safety
zone include all areas within 980 feet of
the firing location adjacent to the AVI
Resort and Casino centered in the
navigational channel between Laughlin
Bridge and the northwest point of the
AVI Resort and Casino Cove in position:
35°00′45″ N., 114°38′16″ W. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
U.S. Coast Guard personnel would
enforce this safety zone. Other Federal,
State, or local agencies may assist the
Coast Guard, including the Coast Guard
Auxiliary. Vessels or persons violating
this rule would be subject to both
criminal and civil penalties.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. Although the safety
zone will restrict boating traffic within
the navigable waters of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, the effect
of this regulation will not be significant
as the safety zone will encompass only
a small portion of the waterway and will
be very short in duration. The entities
most likely to be affected are pleasure
craft engaged in recreational activities
and sightseeing. As such, the Coast
Guard expects the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
10444
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, from 8
p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on May 27, 2007.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. The safety zone
only encompasses a small portion of the
waterway, it is short in duration at a late
hour when commercial traffic is low,
and the Captain of the Port may
authorize entry into the zone, if
necessary.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Chief Petty
Officer Eric Carroll, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
San Diego at telephone (619) 278–7277.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:51 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
we would be establishing a safety zone.
A draft ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check
List’’ and a draft ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the
final decision on whether the rule
should be categorically excluded from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g),
6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T11–170 to
read as follows:
§ 165.T11–170 Safety Zone; Fireworks,
Lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV.
(a) Location. The limits of this
temporary safety zone include all areas
within 980 feet of the anchored firing
barge. The firing barge will be anchored
adjacent to the AVI Resort and Casino,
centered in the navigational channel
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Proposed Rules
between Laughlin Bridge and the
northwest point of the AVI Resort and
Casino Cove, Lower Colorado River,
Laughlin, NV in position 35°00′45″ N,
114°38′16″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 8 p.m. until
the end of the fireworks show on May
27, 2007. The event is scheduled to
conclude no later than 9:45 p.m.
However, if the display concludes prior
to the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transit through, or
anchoring within this zone by all
vessels is prohibited, unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative. Mariners
requesting permission to transit through
the safety zone may request
authorization to do so from the U.S.
Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The
U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may be contacted via VHF–FM Channel
16.
(d) Enforcement. All persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port or the designated on-scene
patrol personnel. Patrol personnel can
be comprised of commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the Coast Guard
onboard Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, local, State, and Federal law
enforcement vessels. Upon being hailed
by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed. The Coast Guard
may be assisted by other Federal, State,
or local agencies.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
C.V. Strangfeld,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Diego.
[FR Doc. E7–4114 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51 and 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2001–0004; FRL–8284–1]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
RIN 2060–AN88
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) and Nonattainment New Source
Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility
in Recordkeeping
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:51 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA proposes revisions
to the regulations governing the major
new source review (NSR) programs
mandated by parts C and D of title I of
the Clean Air Act (CAA). These
proposed changes clarify the
‘‘reasonable possibility’’ recordkeeping
and reporting standard of the 2002 NSR
reform rules. The ‘‘reasonable
possibility’’ standard identifies for
sources and reviewing authorities the
circumstances under which a major
stationary source undergoing a
modification that does not trigger major
NSR must keep records. The standard
also specifies the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements on such sources.
Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the DC Circuit in New York v. EPA, 413
F.3d 3 (DC Cir. 2005) (New York)
remanded for the EPA either to provide
an acceptable explanation for its
‘‘reasonable possibility’’ standard or to
devise an appropriately supported
alternative. To satisfy the Court’s
remand, we (the EPA) are proposing two
alternative options to clarify what
constitutes ‘‘reasonable possibility’’ and
when the ‘‘reasonable possibility’’
recordkeeping requirements apply. The
two options are the ‘‘percentage increase
trigger’’ and the ‘‘potential emissions
trigger.’’
Comments. Comments must be
received on or before May 7, 2007.
Public Hearing. If anyone contacts
EPA requesting a public hearing by
March 22, 2007, we will hold a public
hearing approximately 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2001–0004 by one of the following
methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–1741.
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. In addition,
please mail a copy of your comments on
the information collection provisions to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attn: Desk Officer for
EPA, 725 17th St., NW., Washington, DC
20503.
• Hand Delivery: Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10445
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2001–
0004. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, avoid any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to section I.B
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The Public
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10443-10445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4114]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP San Diego 07-025]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks, Lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of the Lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, in
support of a fireworks display near the AVI Resort and Casino. The
safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew,
spectators, participants of the event, participating vessels and other
vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before April 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Marine Events,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor
Drive, San Diego, CA 92101-1028. Marine Events, Prevention Department,
maintains the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the docket, will become part of this
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at Coast Guard
Sector San Diego between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Petty Officer Eric Carroll,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA, at
telephone (619) 278-7277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking [COTP San
Diego 07-025], indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please
submit all comments and related material in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would
like to know they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in
view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard Sector San Diego at the
address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, in
support of a fireworks show in the navigation channel of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV. The fireworks show is being sponsored by
AVI Resort and Casino. The safety zone will be set at a 980-foot radius
around the anchored firing barge. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the show's crew, spectators,
participants of the event, participating vessels, and other vessels and
users of the waterway.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The event involves one anchored barge, which will be used as a
platform for launching of fireworks. The safety zone is required
because the barge's planned firing location is in the navigation
channel. This safety zone would be enforced from 8 p.m. through 9:45
p.m. on May 27, 2007.
The limits of this temporary safety zone include all areas within
980 feet of the firing location adjacent to the AVI Resort and Casino
centered in the navigational channel between Laughlin Bridge and the
northwest point of the AVI Resort and Casino Cove in position:
35[deg]00'45'' N., 114[deg]38'16'' W. Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative.
U.S. Coast Guard personnel would enforce this safety zone. Other
Federal, State, or local agencies may assist the Coast Guard, including
the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Vessels or persons violating this rule would
be subject to both criminal and civil penalties.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Although the safety zone will
restrict boating traffic within the navigable waters of the Lower
Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, the effect of this regulation will not be
significant as the safety zone will encompass only a small portion of
the waterway and will be very short in duration. The entities most
likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. As such, the Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this rule to be minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 10444]]
The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Lower Colorado
River, Laughlin, NV, from 8 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on May 27, 2007.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. The
safety zone only encompasses a small portion of the waterway, it is
short in duration at a late hour when commercial traffic is low, and
the Captain of the Port may authorize entry into the zone, if
necessary.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Chief Petty Officer Eric
Carroll, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at
telephone (619) 278-7277.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this case
that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2
of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation because we would
be establishing a safety zone. A draft ``Environmental Analysis Check
List'' and a draft ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on
this section will be considered before we make the final decision on
whether the rule should be categorically excluded from further
environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T11-170 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-170 Safety Zone; Fireworks, Lower Colorado River,
Laughlin, NV.
(a) Location. The limits of this temporary safety zone include all
areas within 980 feet of the anchored firing barge. The firing barge
will be anchored adjacent to the AVI Resort and Casino, centered in the
navigational channel
[[Page 10445]]
between Laughlin Bridge and the northwest point of the AVI Resort and
Casino Cove, Lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV in position
35[deg]00'45'' N, 114[deg]38'16'' W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 8
p.m. until the end of the fireworks show on May 27, 2007. The event is
scheduled to conclude no later than 9:45 p.m. However, if the display
concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transit through, or anchoring
within this zone by all vessels is prohibited, unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative. Mariners
requesting permission to transit through the safety zone may request
authorization to do so from the U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The
U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander may be contacted via VHF-FM Channel
16.
(d) Enforcement. All persons and vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated
on-scene patrol personnel. Patrol personnel can be comprised of
commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard onboard
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, State, and Federal law
enforcement vessels. Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator
of a vessel shall proceed as directed. The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local agencies.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
C.V. Strangfeld,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Diego.
[FR Doc. E7-4114 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P