Airworthiness Directives; EADS SOCATA Model TBM 700 Airplanes, 10342-10344 [E7-3990]
Download as PDF
10342
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Independent Counsel appointed by
the Attorney General.
Office of Justice Programs.
Office of the Pardon Attorney
(effective January 28, 1992).
Offices of the United States Attorney
(94).4
Offices of the United States Trustee
(21).5
Office on Violence Against Women 6
(effective March 8, 2007).
Tax Division.
United States Marshals Service
(effective May 16, 1997).
United States Parole Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
I Effective June 6, 2007, appendix B to
part 2641 is further amended by
removing the listing for the Department
of Homeland Security (and all of the
components thereunder).
[FR Doc. E7–4167 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26233; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–63–AD; Amendment 39–
14979; AD 2007–05–18]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; EADS
SOCATA Model TBM 700 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as the finding of an improper
geometry of some pulley brackets,
which can offset the cable in the sheave.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
4 Each Office of the United States Attorney for a
judicial district shall be considered a separate
component from each other such office.
5 Each Office of the United States Trustee for a
region shall be considered a separate component
from each other such office.
6 The Office on Violence Against Women shall
not be considered separate from the Office of Justice
Programs, but only from other designated
components of the Department of Justice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
This AD becomes effective April
12, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of April 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4119; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This AD references the MCAI and
related service information that we
considered in forming the engineering
basis to correct the unsafe condition.
The AD contains text copied from the
MCAI and for this reason might not
follow our plain language principles.
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 7, 2006 (71 FR
70908). That NPRM proposed to require
a detailed inspection of the aileron
control cable pulleys and brackets, and
apply corrective actions as necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
EADS SOCATA believes the FAA
should reference the changes in the
NPRM of the compliance time from 10
hours time-in-service (TIS) in the MCAI
and service bulletin to 50 hours TIS in
the NPRM in the ‘‘FAA AD Differences’’
section.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The FAA sometimes needs to change
compliance times for enforceability
reasons. We normally do not include
that as an FAA AD Difference in an AD
action, unless it affects the actions being
done. However, since this compliance
time change was significant, we will
note it as a difference. The difference
will state that the MCAI and service
bulletin requires the action at 10 hours
TIS. Typically, this short of a
compliance time would indicate an
unsafe condition requiring urgent
action. However, we did not consider
this unsafe condition to be an urgent
safety of flight condition and issued this
action through the normal notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) AD
process. The time of 50 hours TIS is an
adequate compliance for this AD action
and met the FAA requirements of an
NPRM followed by a final rule.
EADS SOCATA comments that EADS
SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70–134, dated July
2005, is not an Alert.
The FAA agrees and changes the
reference to the service information in
the final rule.
EADS SOCATA states that the costs of
the required parts is about $450 per
product and not the $8,600 per product
that is in the Costs of Compliance
section of the NPRM. EADS SOCATA
also estimates that it would take 2.5
work-hours to inspect and 8.5 workhours to replace the nonconforming
parts, if necessary. This total of 11 workhours is less than the 12 work-hours
that the FAA estimates in the NPRM.
The FAA agrees and has changed the
Costs of Compliance section in the final
rule to reflect the above costs.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable in a U.S.
court of law. In making these changes,
we do not intend to differ substantively
from the information provided in the
MCAI and related service information.
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
08MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies.
Any such differences are described in a
separate paragraph of the AD. These
requirements, if any, take precedence
over the actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
55 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 11 workhours per product to comply with this
AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts will cost
about $450 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty,
we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$73,150, or $1,330 per product.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the
NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2007–05–18 EADS SOCATA: Amendment
39–14979; Docket No. FAA–2006–26233;
Directorate Identifier 2006–CE–63–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective April 12, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model TBM 700
airplanes, serial numbers 261 through 268
and 270 through 323, certificated in any
category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states the
finding of an improper geometry of some
pulley brackets, which can offset the cable in
the sheave. If not corrected, this could reduce
the ability to control the roll of the aircraft.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, within the next 50
hours time-in-service after April 12, 2007
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10343
(the effective date of this AD), accomplish a
detailed inspection of the aileron control
cable pulleys and brackets, and apply
corrective actions as necessary, following
EADS SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB 70–134, dated July 2005.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: The MCAI
and service bulletin require the action at 10
hours TIS. We consider 10 hours TIS as an
urgent safety of flight compliance time, and
we do not consider this unsafe condition to
be an urgent safety of flight condition.
Because we do not consider this unsafe
condition to be an urgent safety of flight
condition, we issued this action through the
normal notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) AD process. The time of 50 hours
TIS is an adequate compliance for this AD
action and met the FAA requirements of an
NPRM followed by a final rule.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff,
FAA, ATTN: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace
Safety Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4119; fax: (816) 329–4090, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
´ ´
(g) Refer to Direction generale de l’aviation
civile (DGAC) Airworthiness Directive No. F–
2005–133, dated August 3, 2005, for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use EADS SOCATA TBM
Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70–
134, dated July 2005, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact EADS SOCATA, Direction
des Services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France;
telephone: 33 (0)5 62 41 73 00; fax: 33 (0)5
62 41 76 54; or SOCATA AIRCRAFT, INC.,
North Perry Airport, 7501 South Airport Rd.,
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
08MRR1
10344
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Pembroke Pines, FL 33023; telephone: (954)
893–1400; fax: (954) 964–4141.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
1, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3990 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25000; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–096–AD; Amendment
39–14955; AD 2005–24–03 R1]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, and –800
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is revising an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to certain Boeing Model
737–600, –700, –700C, and –800 series
airplanes. That AD currently requires
inspecting/measuring the length of the
attachment fasteners between the
nacelle support fittings and the lower
wing skin panels, and related
investigative/corrective actions if
necessary. That AD resulted from a
report from the manufacturer that in
production, during the installation of
certain attachment fasteners for the
nacelle support fittings, only one
washer was installed instead of two.
This new AD corrects errors found in
the existing AD. We are issuing this AD
to prevent inadequate fastener clampup, which could result in cracking of
the fastener holes, cracking along the
lower wing skin panels, fuel leaking
from the wing fuel tanks onto the
engines, and possible fire.
DATES: The effective date of this AD is
April 12, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of April 12, 2007.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Mar 07, 2007
Jkt 211001
On December 28, 2005 (70 FR 70713,
November 23, 2005), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–57–1275, Revision
1, dated August 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6440; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the street
address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA proposed to amend part 39
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) with an airworthiness
directive (AD) to revise AD 2005–24–03,
amendment 39–14383 (70 FR 70713,
November 23, 2005). The existing AD
applies to certain Boeing Model 737–
600, –700, –700C, and –800 series
airplanes. The proposed AD was
published in the Federal Register on
June 13, 2006 (71 FR 34026). That action
proposed to continue to require
inspecting/measuring the length of the
attachment fasteners between the
nacelle support fittings and the lower
wing skin panels, and related
investigative/corrective actions if
necessary. That action also proposed to
correct errors found in the existing AD.
Comment
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comment received.
Request To Cite Revised Service
Information
Boeing states that, subsequent to the
drafting of the subject AD, Boeing
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Service Bulletin 737–57–1275, Revision
2, dated July 12, 2006, was issued.
Boeing notes that Revision 2 will aid
operators in completing the required
tasks by more effectively and efficiently
performing the inspections, while
reducing the likelihood of introducing
damage reported during completion of
the previous revisions. Boeing
recommends that Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–57–1275, Revision 3, dated
October 17, 2006, be incorporated into
the NPRM, which further improves ease
in completing the required tasks.
(Revision 3 was not yet issued when the
comment was submitted, but has since
been issued.)
We agree with this request. We have
reviewed Revision 3 of the referenced
service bulletin which specifies that no
more work is necessary on airplanes
changed as shown in the original issue,
dated September 4, 2003; Revision 1,
dated August 18, 2005; and Revision 2,
dated July 12, 2006. (We referred to
Revision 1 in the NPRM as the
appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the
required actions.) We have determined
that Revision 3 shows changes of
operators in the effectivity and clarifies
the oversize limits for replacement
fasteners, but does not add any further
actions or increase the economic burden
on operators. Therefore, we have
changed the AD to add Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–57–1275, Revision 3, dated
October 17, 2006, as the appropriate
source of service information for
accomplishing the requirements in
paragraph (f) of this AD after the
effective date of this AD.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comment
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the change described
previously. We have determined that
this change will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 751 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD. The requirements
that were previously required by AD
2005–24–03 are retained in this AD; this
AD adds no additional economic burden
on U.S. operators. The current costs are
repeated for the convenience of affected
operators, as follows:
Estimated Costs
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
08MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10342-10344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3990]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-26233; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-63-AD;
Amendment 39-14979; AD 2007-05-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; EADS SOCATA Model TBM 700 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as the
finding of an improper geometry of some pulley brackets, which can
offset the cable in the sheave. We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April 12, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 12,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance
of ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined process will allow us to adopt
MCAI safety requirements in a more efficient manner and will reduce
safety risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD
issuance processes to meet legal, economic, Administrative Procedure
Act, and Federal Register requirements. We also continue to meet our
technical decision-making responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated products.
This AD references the MCAI and related service information that we
considered in forming the engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The AD contains text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain language principles.
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2006 (71
FR 70908). That NPRM proposed to require a detailed inspection of the
aileron control cable pulleys and brackets, and apply corrective
actions as necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received.
EADS SOCATA believes the FAA should reference the changes in the
NPRM of the compliance time from 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) in the
MCAI and service bulletin to 50 hours TIS in the NPRM in the ``FAA AD
Differences'' section.
The FAA sometimes needs to change compliance times for
enforceability reasons. We normally do not include that as an FAA AD
Difference in an AD action, unless it affects the actions being done.
However, since this compliance time change was significant, we will
note it as a difference. The difference will state that the MCAI and
service bulletin requires the action at 10 hours TIS. Typically, this
short of a compliance time would indicate an unsafe condition requiring
urgent action. However, we did not consider this unsafe condition to be
an urgent safety of flight condition and issued this action through the
normal notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) AD process. The time of 50
hours TIS is an adequate compliance for this AD action and met the FAA
requirements of an NPRM followed by a final rule.
EADS SOCATA comments that EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-134, dated July 2005, is not an Alert.
The FAA agrees and changes the reference to the service information
in the final rule.
EADS SOCATA states that the costs of the required parts is about
$450 per product and not the $8,600 per product that is in the Costs of
Compliance section of the NPRM. EADS SOCATA also estimates that it
would take 2.5 work-hours to inspect and 8.5 work-hours to replace the
nonconforming parts, if necessary. This total of 11 work-hours is less
than the 12 work-hours that the FAA estimates in the NPRM.
The FAA agrees and has changed the Costs of Compliance section in
the final rule to reflect the above costs.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable in a U.S. court of
law. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively
from the information provided in the MCAI and related service
information.
[[Page 10343]]
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements, if
any, take precedence over the actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 55 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 11 work-hours per product to
comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $450 per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty,
we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts. As we do
not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $73,150, or
$1,330 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2007-05-18 EADS SOCATA: Amendment 39-14979; Docket No. FAA-2006-
26233; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-63-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April
12, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model TBM 700 airplanes, serial numbers
261 through 268 and 270 through 323, certificated in any category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states the finding of an improper geometry of some pulley brackets,
which can offset the cable in the sheave. If not corrected, this
could reduce the ability to control the roll of the aircraft.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, within the next 50 hours time-in-
service after April 12, 2007 (the effective date of this AD),
accomplish a detailed inspection of the aileron control cable
pulleys and brackets, and apply corrective actions as necessary,
following EADS SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-134, dated
July 2005.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: The MCAI and service bulletin require the action at 10
hours TIS. We consider 10 hours TIS as an urgent safety of flight
compliance time, and we do not consider this unsafe condition to be
an urgent safety of flight condition. Because we do not consider
this unsafe condition to be an urgent safety of flight condition, we
issued this action through the normal notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) AD process. The time of 50 hours TIS is an adequate
compliance for this AD action and met the FAA requirements of an
NPRM followed by a final rule.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, ATTN: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Safety
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816)
329-4090, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to Direction g[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'aviation
civile (DGAC) Airworthiness Directive No. F-2005-133, dated August
3, 2005, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 70-134, dated July 2005, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact EADS
SOCATA, Direction des Services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France;
telephone: 33 (0)5 62 41 73 00; fax: 33 (0)5 62 41 76 54; or SOCATA
AIRCRAFT, INC., North Perry Airport, 7501 South Airport Rd.,
[[Page 10344]]
Pembroke Pines, FL 33023; telephone: (954) 893-1400; fax: (954) 964-
4141.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 1, 2007.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-3990 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P