Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 10217-10219 [E7-3985]

Download as PDF 10217 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices discussion groups of no more than ten individuals. Each facilitator will complete a brief facilitator information form designed to provide descriptive information about the group session. Each participant in the discussion groups will complete a pre and post program questionnaire. A total of 360 participants 18 years or older, African American who either have diabetes or friends and/or family members of someone with diabetes will participate in the discussion groups; (2) These 360 participants will also complete a onemonth follow up survey to assess whether or not desired behavior change occurred. The survey will be administered via mail, telephone and web and will take approximately 20–30 minutes to complete; (3) A selected sample of participants with diabetes (n=18) will participate in 1-hour telephone interviews to discuss their experiences with the intervention, Type of respondent including any challenges they faced; (4) Twenty trained and lay facilitators will participate in 1-hour in-depth interviews to discuss the usefulness of the guide; (5) A feedback form for users of the New Beginnings discussion guide will be part of the future distribution of the guide. This form is designed to provide on-going input from new users of the guide. The only cost to respondents is their time to participate in the survey. Study Design The study will consist of the following three groups of facilitators and participants: Group 1: Twelve facilitators will convene groups of participants and complete the facilitator feedback forms. The same 120 participants will view the movie and complete the pre-, post-, and follow-up questionnaires. Group 2: Twelve facilitators will convene groups of participants and Number of respondents Form name Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 2: 2: 2: 2: 2: Facilitator .......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Facilitator .......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Group Group Group Group Group Group 2: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: Participant ......................... Facilitator .......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... Participant ......................... complete the facilitator feedback forms. The same 120 participants will view the movie, participate in one discussion session, and complete the pre-, post-, and follow-up questionnaires. Group 3: Twelve facilitators will convene groups of participants and complete the facilitator feedback forms for each discussion session convened. The same 120 participants will view the movie, participate in 2–4 discussion sessions, and complete the pre-, post-, and follow-up questionnaires. Additionally: 18 participants (drawn from the total pool of 360) will participate in in-depth interviews. Twenty trained and lay facilitators will participate in in-depth interviews. 50 facilitators will complete the feedback form that accompanies the discussion guide. Estimated Annualized Burden Hours Number responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hours) Total burden (in hours) 12 120 120 120 120 12 120 120 120 120 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5/60 30/60 20/60 20/60 20/60 10/60 30/60 20/60 20/60 60/60 1 60 40 40 40 2 60 40 40 120 120 12 120 120 120 120 1 4 1 1 4 1 20/60 10/60 30/60 20/60 60/60 20/60 40 8 60 40 480 40 Group 3: Participant ......................... Facilitator .......................................... Participant ........................................ Facilitator .......................................... Facilitator Information Form ............ View the movie ................................ Pre-program questionnaire .............. Post-program questionnaire ............ Follow-up questionnaire .................. Facilitator Information Form ............ View the movie ................................ Pre-program questionnaire .............. Post-program questionnaire ............ Participate in one facilitated discussion. Follow-up questionnaire .................. Facilitator Information Form ............ View the movie ................................ Pre-program questionnaire .............. Post-program questionnaire ............ Participate in four facilitated discussions. Follow-up questionnaire .................. In-depth interview ............................ In-depth interview ............................ Feedback Forms ............................. 120 20 18 50 1 1 1 1 20/60 60/60 60/60 10/60 40 20 18 8.5 Total .......................................... .......................................................... 396 ........................ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES BILLING CODE 4163–18–P sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Dated: February 28, 2007. Joan F. Karr, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. E7–3984 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] [60-Day 07–0639] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:25 Mar 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 .......................... 1197.5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–5960 and send comments to Joan Karr, CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1 10218 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Proposed Project Special Exposure Cohort Petitions— Extension—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description On October 30, 2000, the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA), 42 U.S.C. 7384–7385 [1994, supp. 2001] was enacted. It established a compensation program to provide a lump sum payment of $150,000 and medical benefits as compensation to covered employees suffering from designated illnesses incurred as a result of their exposure to radiation, beryllium, or silica while in the performance of duty for the Department of Energy and certain of its vendors, contractors and subcontractors. This legislation also provided for payment of compensation for certain survivors of these covered employees. The only change to the collection is an increase in burden hours because more petitioners are requesting to have their work site named as a special exposure cohort. This program has been mandated to be in effect until Congress ends the funding. EEOICPA instructed the President to designate one or more Federal Agencies to carry out the compensation program. Accordingly, the President issued Executive Order 13179 (‘‘Providing Compensation to America’s Nuclear Weapons Workers’’) on December 7, 2000 (65 FR 77487), assigning primary responsibility for administration of the compensation program to the Department of Labor (DOL). The executive order directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to perform several technical and policymaking roles in support of the DOL program. Among other duties, the executive order directed HHS to establish and VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:25 Mar 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 implement procedures for considering petitions by classes of nuclear weapons workers to be added to the ‘‘Special Exposure Cohort’’ (the ‘‘Cohort’’), various groups of workers whose claims for cancer under EEOICPA can be adjudicated without demonstrating that their cancer was ‘‘at least as likely as not’’ caused by radiation doses they incurred in the performance of duty. In brief, EEOICPA authorizes HHS to designate such classes of employees for addition to the Cohort when NIOSH lacks sufficient information to estimate with sufficient accuracy the radiation doses of the employees, if HHS also finds that the health of members of the class may have been endangered by the radiation dose the class potentially incurred. HHS must also obtain the advice of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the ‘‘Board’’) in establishing such findings. On March 7, 2003, HHS proposed procedures for adding such classes to the Cohort in a notice of proposed rulemaking at 42 CFR Part 83. The HHS procedures authorize a variety of individuals and entities to submit petitions, as specified under § 83.7. Petitioners are required to provide the information specified in § 83.9 to qualify their petitions for a complete evaluation by HHS and the Board. HHS has developed two petition forms to assist the petitioners in providing this required information efficiently and completely. Petition Form A is a one-page form to be used by EEOICPA claimants for whom NIOSH will have attempted to conduct dose reconstructions and will have determined that available information is not sufficient to complete the dose reconstruction. The form addresses the informational requirements specified under § 83.9(a) and (b). Petition Form B, accompanied by separate instructions, is intended for all other petitioners. The form addresses the informational requirements specified under § 83.9(a) and (c). Forms A and B can be submitted electronically as well as in hard copy. Petitioners should be aware that HHS is not requiring petitioners to use the forms. Petitioners can choose to submit petitions as letters or in other formats, but petitions must meet the informational requirements referenced above. NIOSH expects, however, that all petitioners for whom Form A would be appropriate will actually use the form, since NIOSH will provide it to them upon determining that their dose reconstruction cannot be completed and encourage them to submit the petition. PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 NIOSH expects the large majority of petitioners for whom Form B would be appropriate will also use the form, since it provides a simple, organized format for addressing the informational requirements of a petition. NIOSH will use the information obtained through the petition for the following purposes: (a) Identify the petitioner(s), obtain their contact information, and establish that the petitioner(s) is qualified and intends to petition HHS; (b) establish an initial definition of the class of employees being proposed to be considered for addition to the Cohort; (c) determine whether there is justification to require HHS to evaluate whether or not to designate the proposed class as an addition to the Cohort (such an evaluation involves potentially extensive data collection, analysis, and related deliberations by NIOSH, the Board, and HHS); and, (d) target an evaluation by HHS to examine relevant potential limitations of radiation monitoring and/or dosimetry-relevant records and to examine the potential for related radiation exposures that might have endangered the health of members of the class. Finally, under § 83.18, petitioners may contest the proposed decision of the Secretary to add or deny adding classes of employees to the cohort by submitting evidence that the proposed decision relies on a record of either factual or procedural errors in the implementation of these procedures. NIOSH estimates that the time to prepare and submit such a challenge is 45 minutes. Because of the uniqueness of this submission, NIOSH is not providing a form. The submission should be in a letter format. There are no costs to petitioners unless a petitioner chooses to purchase the services of a expert in dose reconstruction, an option provided for under 42 CFR 83.9(c)(2)(iii). The petitioner would assume the financial burden of purchasing such services at their option. In such cases, HHS estimates a report by such an expert may cost between $640 and $6,400, depending on the scope of the petition and access to relevant information. This is based on an estimate of costs of $80 per hour for contractual services by a health physicist, who NIOSH estimates would be employed within a range of eight to eighty hours to conduct and prepare a report on the required assessment. Estimate of Annualized Burden Hours E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1 10219 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices Form name & number (CFR reference) Number of respondents Respondents 83.9 ................... 83.9 ................... 83.9 ................... 83.18 ................. Total .......... Petitioners Petitioners Petitioners Petitioners Number of responses per respondent Average burden per respondent (in hours) using Form A ................................................ using Form B ................................................ not using Form B .......................................... Appealing proposed decisions ..................... 30 40 5 5 1 1 1 1 3/60 5 5.5 45/60 ......................................................................................... 80 ........................ ........................ Dated: February 28, 2007. Joan F. Karr, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. E7–3985 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60-Day 07–07AN] Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–5960 and send comments to Joan Karr, CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including Total burden (in hours) 1.5 200 27.5 3.75 233 at a national corporation. The purpose of the proposed evaluation is to document in detail the workplace IPV prevention activities delivered by the company, to determine the impact of these activities on short-term and longterm outcomes, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of the program. All managers at the corporation will be screened to assess training experiences. Then, more in-depth surveys will be done among managers who have not had the corporation’s IPV training. We will survey those 500 managers at baseline, and 6 and 12 months later. Manager surveys will focus on knowledge/awareness of IPV and company resources for IPV and number of referrals for IPV assistance. We will also survey employees of those managers using an anonymous webbased survey at baseline and 12 months later to assess their self-evaluated productivity, absenteeism, and perceptions of manager behavior. We will compare the responses of managers (and their employees) who received the IPV training in the study period (i.e., sometime between the baseline and 12 month surveys) with untrained managers. The study will provide CDC and employers information about the potential effectiveness and costeffectiveness of workplace IPV intervention strategies. whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proposed Project Program Effectiveness Evaluation of Workplace Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)—New—National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects a substantial number of Americans, and there has recently been increasing recognition of the impact it has on the workplace. In addition to direct impacts (batterers often stalk or even attack IPV victims at their place of work), IPV has indirect impacts on the workplace environment through lost productivity due to medical leave, absenteeism, and fear and distraction on the part of victims and coworkers. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has employed contractor support to evaluate an ongoing workplace IPV prevention program being implemented There are no costs to respondents except their time to participate in the interview. ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Average burden per response (in hours) Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Employee ......................................................................................................... Manager ........................................................................................................... 1500 500 2 3 30/60 30/60 1500 75 Total .......................................................................................................... 2000 ........................ ........................ 2250 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Respondents VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:10 Mar 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1 Total burden (in hours)

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10217-10219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60-Day 07-0639]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

    In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on 
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. 
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a 
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-5960 
and send comments to Joan Karr, CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 
1600 Clifton Road, MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to 
omb@cdc.gov.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance

[[Page 10218]]

of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written 
comments should be received within 60 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Special Exposure Cohort Petitions--Extension--National Institute 
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    On October 30, 2000, the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 
Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA), 42 U.S.C. 7384-7385 [1994, 
supp. 2001] was enacted. It established a compensation program to 
provide a lump sum payment of $150,000 and medical benefits as 
compensation to covered employees suffering from designated illnesses 
incurred as a result of their exposure to radiation, beryllium, or 
silica while in the performance of duty for the Department of Energy 
and certain of its vendors, contractors and subcontractors. This 
legislation also provided for payment of compensation for certain 
survivors of these covered employees. The only change to the collection 
is an increase in burden hours because more petitioners are requesting 
to have their work site named as a special exposure cohort. This 
program has been mandated to be in effect until Congress ends the 
funding.
    EEOICPA instructed the President to designate one or more Federal 
Agencies to carry out the compensation program. Accordingly, the 
President issued Executive Order 13179 (``Providing Compensation to 
America's Nuclear Weapons Workers'') on December 7, 2000 (65 FR 77487), 
assigning primary responsibility for administration of the compensation 
program to the Department of Labor (DOL). The executive order directed 
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to perform several 
technical and policymaking roles in support of the DOL program.
    Among other duties, the executive order directed HHS to establish 
and implement procedures for considering petitions by classes of 
nuclear weapons workers to be added to the ``Special Exposure Cohort'' 
(the ``Cohort''), various groups of workers whose claims for cancer 
under EEOICPA can be adjudicated without demonstrating that their 
cancer was ``at least as likely as not'' caused by radiation doses they 
incurred in the performance of duty. In brief, EEOICPA authorizes HHS 
to designate such classes of employees for addition to the Cohort when 
NIOSH lacks sufficient information to estimate with sufficient accuracy 
the radiation doses of the employees, if HHS also finds that the health 
of members of the class may have been endangered by the radiation dose 
the class potentially incurred. HHS must also obtain the advice of the 
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the ``Board'') in 
establishing such findings. On March 7, 2003, HHS proposed procedures 
for adding such classes to the Cohort in a notice of proposed 
rulemaking at 42 CFR Part 83.
    The HHS procedures authorize a variety of individuals and entities 
to submit petitions, as specified under Sec.  83.7. Petitioners are 
required to provide the information specified in Sec.  83.9 to qualify 
their petitions for a complete evaluation by HHS and the Board. HHS has 
developed two petition forms to assist the petitioners in providing 
this required information efficiently and completely. Petition Form A 
is a one-page form to be used by EEOICPA claimants for whom NIOSH will 
have attempted to conduct dose reconstructions and will have determined 
that available information is not sufficient to complete the dose 
reconstruction. The form addresses the informational requirements 
specified under Sec.  83.9(a) and (b). Petition Form B, accompanied by 
separate instructions, is intended for all other petitioners. The form 
addresses the informational requirements specified under Sec.  83.9(a) 
and (c). Forms A and B can be submitted electronically as well as in 
hard copy. Petitioners should be aware that HHS is not requiring 
petitioners to use the forms. Petitioners can choose to submit 
petitions as letters or in other formats, but petitions must meet the 
informational requirements referenced above. NIOSH expects, however, 
that all petitioners for whom Form A would be appropriate will actually 
use the form, since NIOSH will provide it to them upon determining that 
their dose reconstruction cannot be completed and encourage them to 
submit the petition. NIOSH expects the large majority of petitioners 
for whom Form B would be appropriate will also use the form, since it 
provides a simple, organized format for addressing the informational 
requirements of a petition.
    NIOSH will use the information obtained through the petition for 
the following purposes: (a) Identify the petitioner(s), obtain their 
contact information, and establish that the petitioner(s) is qualified 
and intends to petition HHS; (b) establish an initial definition of the 
class of employees being proposed to be considered for addition to the 
Cohort; (c) determine whether there is justification to require HHS to 
evaluate whether or not to designate the proposed class as an addition 
to the Cohort (such an evaluation involves potentially extensive data 
collection, analysis, and related deliberations by NIOSH, the Board, 
and HHS); and, (d) target an evaluation by HHS to examine relevant 
potential limitations of radiation monitoring and/or dosimetry-relevant 
records and to examine the potential for related radiation exposures 
that might have endangered the health of members of the class.
    Finally, under Sec.  83.18, petitioners may contest the proposed 
decision of the Secretary to add or deny adding classes of employees to 
the cohort by submitting evidence that the proposed decision relies on 
a record of either factual or procedural errors in the implementation 
of these procedures. NIOSH estimates that the time to prepare and 
submit such a challenge is 45 minutes. Because of the uniqueness of 
this submission, NIOSH is not providing a form. The submission should 
be in a letter format.
    There are no costs to petitioners unless a petitioner chooses to 
purchase the services of a expert in dose reconstruction, an option 
provided for under 42 CFR 83.9(c)(2)(iii). The petitioner would assume 
the financial burden of purchasing such services at their option. In 
such cases, HHS estimates a report by such an expert may cost between 
$640 and $6,400, depending on the scope of the petition and access to 
relevant information. This is based on an estimate of costs of $80 per 
hour for contractual services by a health physicist, who NIOSH 
estimates would be employed within a range of eight to eighty hours to 
conduct and prepare a report on the required assessment.
    Estimate of Annualized Burden Hours

[[Page 10219]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Average
  Form name & number (CFR                            Number of       Number of      burden per     Total burden
        reference)               Respondents        respondents    responses per  respondent (in    (in hours)
                                                                    respondent        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83.9......................  Petitioners using                 30               1            3/60            1.5
                             Form A.
83.9......................  Petitioners using                 40               1               5          200
                             Form B.
83.9......................  Petitioners not                    5               1             5.5           27.5
                             using Form B.
83.18.....................  Petitioners                        5               1           45/60            3.75
                             Appealing proposed
                             decisions.
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.................  ....................              80  ..............  ..............          233
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Joan F. Karr,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-3985 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.