Rules of Practice: Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures, 10086-10088 [E7-3923]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
10086
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
property whose expected useful life is
two years or longer and whose
acquisition value, as determined by the
agency, warrants tracking in the
agency’s property records, including
capitalized and sensitive personal
property.
Accountability means the ability to
account for personal property by
providing a complete audit trail for
property transactions from receipt to
final disposition.
Acquisition cost means the original
purchase price of an item.
Capitalized Personal Property
includes property that is entered on the
agency’s general ledger records as a
major investment or asset. An agency
must determine its capitalization
thresholds as discussed in Financial
Accounting Standard Advisory Board
(FASAB) Statement of Federal Financial
Accounting Standards No. 6 Accounting
for Property, Plant and Equipment,
Chapter 1, paragraph 13.
Control means the ongoing function of
maintaining physical oversight and
surveillance of personal property
throughout its complete life cycle using
various property management tools and
techniques taking into account the
environment in which the property is
located and its vulnerability to theft,
waste, fraud, or abuse.
Excess personal property (see § 102–
36.40 of this subchapter B).
Exchange/sale (see § 102–39.20 of this
subchapter B).
Executive agency (see § 102–36.40 of
this subchapter B).
Federal agency (see § 102–36.40 of
this subchapter B).
Foreign gifts and decorations (for the
definition of relevant terms, see § 102–
42.10 of this subchapter B).
Forfeited property (see § 102–41.20 of
this subchapter B).
Inventory includes a formal listing of
all accountable property items assigned
to an agency, along with a formal
process to verify the condition, location,
and quantity of such items. This term
may also be used as a verb to indicate
the actions leading to the development
of a listing. In this sense, an inventory
must be conducted using an actual
physical count, electronic means, and/
or statistical methods.
National property management officer
means an official, designated in
accordance with § 102–36.45(b) of this
subchapter B, who is responsible for
ensuring effective acquisition, use, and
disposal of excess property within your
agency.
Personal property (see § 102–36.40 of
this subchapter B).
Property management means the
system of acquiring, maintaining, using
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Mar 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
and disposing of the personal property
of an organization or entity.
Seized property means personal
property that has been confiscated by a
Federal agency, and whose care and
handling will be the responsibility of
that agency until final ownership is
determined by the judicial process.
Sensitive Personal Property includes
all items, regardless of value, that
require special control and
accountability due to unusual rates of
loss, theft or misuse, or due to national
security or export control
considerations. Such property includes
weapons, ammunition, explosives,
information technology equipment with
memory capability, cameras, and
communications equipment. These
classifications do not preclude agencies
from specifying additional personal
property classifications to effectively
manage their programs.
Surplus personal property (see § 102–
37.25 of this subchapter B).
Utilization means the identification,
reporting, and transfer of excess
personal property among Federal
agencies.
§ 102–35.25 What management reports
must we provide?
(a) There are three reports that must
be provided. The report summarizing
the property provided to non-Federal
recipients and the report summarizing
exchange/sale transactions (see §§ 102–
36.295 and 102–39.75 respectively of
this subchapter B) must be provided
every year (negative reports are
required). In addition, if you conduct
negotiated sales of surplus personal
property valued over $5,000 in any year,
you must report this transaction in
accordance with § 102–38.115 (negative
reports are not required for this report).
(b) The General Services
Administration (GSA) may request other
reports as authorized by 40 U.S.C.
506(a)(1)(A).
§ 102–35.30 What actions must I take or
am I authorized to take regardless of the
property disposition method?
Regardless of the disposition method
used:
(a) You must maintain property in a
safe, secure, and cost-effective manner
until final disposition.
(b) You have authority to use the
abandonment/ destruction provisions at
any stage of the disposal process (see
§§ 102–36.305 through 102–36.330 and
§ 102–38.70 of this subchapter B).
(c) You must implement policies and
procedures to remove sensitive or
classified information from property
prior to disposal. Agency-affixed
markings should be removed, if at all
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
possible, prior to personal property
permanently leaving your agency’s
control.
(d) Government-owned personal
property may only be used as
authorized by your agency. Title to
Government-owned personal property
cannot be transferred to a non-Federal
entity unless through official procedures
specifically authorized by law.
[FR Doc. E7–3958 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–S
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 211
[Docket No. 2006–24141, Notice No. 2]
RIN 2130–AB77
Rules of Practice: Direct Final
Rulemaking Procedures
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In October 2006, FRA
proposed to amend its rules of practice
by adopting direct final rulemaking
procedures intended to expedite the
publication of routine or
noncontroversial changes. FRA received
no comments to this proposal, and in
this rule adopts its proposed direct final
rulemaking procedures without change.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 6,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia V. Sun, Trial Attorney, Mail
Stop 10, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20005 (telephone:
(202) 493–6038).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 11, 2006, FRA proposed
to amend its Rules of Practice (49 CFR
Part 211) to adopt direct final
rulemaking procedures which would
expedite its rulemaking process for
noncontroversial regulatory changes to
which no adverse comment was
anticipated (71 FR 59698). The
proposed direct final rulemaking
procedures, closely modeled upon those
of the Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (OST) (January 30, 2004,
69 FR 4455), would allow FRA to
reduce the time necessary to develop,
review, clear and publish routine rules
to which no adverse public comment
was anticipated by eliminating the
requirement to publish separate
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
proposed and final rules. FRA received
no comments to the proposal, and in
this rule adopts its proposed direct final
rulemaking procedures without change.
Other agencies, such as the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, the Food and
Drug Administration, the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Department of
Agriculture, and the Department of
Energy (DOE) have adopted and
successfully used direct final
rulemaking procedures for routine
changes. The DOE, for example,
amended its test procedures for
measuring the energy consumption of
clothes washers through a direct final
rule (October 31, 2003, 68 FR 62197).
The Direct Final Rulemaking Process
As mentioned above, proceeding
through a direct final rulemaking
enables FRA to eliminate an
unnecessary second round of internal
review and clearance, as well as public
review, for noncontroversial proposed
rules. As proposed, FRA may use direct
final rulemaking for noncontroversial
rules, including those that:
(1) Affect internal procedures of the
Federal Railroad Administration, such
as filing requirements and rules
governing inspection and copying of
documents,
(2) Are nonsubstantive clarifications
or corrections to existing rules;
(3) Update existing forms; and
(4) Make minor changes in
substantive rules regarding statistics and
reporting requirements, such as a
lessening of the reporting frequency (for
example, from monthly to quarterly) or
elimination of a type of data that FRA
no longer needs to collect.
FRA may also use direct final
rulemaking process for a particular rule
if similar rules had been previously
proposed and published without
adverse comment.
If FRA determines that a rule is
appropriate for direct final rulemaking,
FRA will publish the rule in the final
rule section of the Federal Register. In
a direct final rule document, the
‘‘action’’ will be captioned ‘‘direct final
rule’’ and will include language in the
summary and preamble informing
interested parties of their right to
comment and their right to request an
oral hearing, if such opportunity is
required. The direct final rule notice
will advise the public that FRA
anticipates no adverse comment to the
rule and that the rule will become
effective a specified number of days
after the date of publication unless FRA
receives written adverse comment or a
request for an oral hearing (if such
opportunity is required by statute)
within the specified comment period.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Mar 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
An ‘‘adverse’’ comment is one that is
critical of the rule, suggests that the rule
should not be adopted, or suggests that
a change should be made in the rule.
FRA will not consider a comment
submitted in support of the rule, or a
request for clarification of the rule, to be
adverse. FRA will provide sufficient
comment time to allow interested
parties to determine whether they wish
or need to submit adverse comments,
and will answer any requests for
clarification while the comment period
is running. If FRA receives no written
adverse comment or request for oral
hearing within the comment period,
FRA will publish another notice in the
Federal Register indicating that no
adverse comment has been received and
confirming that the rule will become
effective on the specified date.
If, however, FRA receives the timely
submission of an adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit adverse
comment, FRA will stop the direct final
rulemaking process and withdraw the
direct final rule by publishing a notice
in the final rule section of the Federal
Register. If FRA decides that the
rulemaking remains necessary, FRA will
recommence the rulemaking under its
standard rulemaking procedures by
publishing a notice proposing the rule
in the proposed rules section of the
Federal Register. The proposed rule
will provide for a new public comment
period.
The additional time and effort
required to withdraw the direct final
rule and issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking will be an incentive for
FRA to act conservatively in evaluating
whether to use the direct final
rulemaking process for a particular rule.
FRA will not use direct final rulemaking
for complex or potentially controversial
matters.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
FRA has determined that this action
is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 or under
the Department’s Regulatory Policies
and Procedures. There are no costs
associated with the proposed rule.
There will be some cost savings in
Federal Register publication costs and
efficiencies for the public and FRA
personnel in eliminating duplicative
reviews. FRA certifies that this rule will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
FRA does not believe there are sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
Because this rule does not have tribal
implications and does not impose direct
compliance costs, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10087
Order 13175 (‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’) do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information
collection requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
FRA has determined that the
requirements of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 do not
apply to this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 211
Administrative practice and
procedure, Rules of practice.
I In consideration of the foregoing, FRA
amends 49 CFR part 211 as follows:
PART 211—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 211
is amended to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 20103, 20107, 20114,
20306, 20502–20504, and 49 CFR 1.49.
2. In part 211, subpart B—Rulemaking
Procedures, is amended by adding a
new section 211.33, Direct final
rulemaking procedures, as follows:
I
§ 211.33 Direct final rulemaking
procedures.
(a) Rules that the Administrator
judges to be noncontroversial and
unlikely to result in adverse public
comment may be published in the final
rule section of the Federal Register as
direct final rules. These include
noncontroversial rules that:
(1) Affect internal procedures of the
Federal Railroad Administration, such
as filing requirements and rules
governing inspection and copying of
documents,
(2) Are nonsubstantive clarifications
or corrections to existing rules,
(3) Update existing forms, and
(4) Make minor changes in the
substantive rules regarding statistics and
reporting requirements.
(b) The Federal Register document
will state that any adverse comment or
notice of intent to submit adverse
comment must be received in writing by
the Federal Railroad Administration
within the specified time after the date
of publication and that, if no written
adverse comment or request for oral
hearing (if such opportunity is required
by statute) is received, the rule will
become effective a specified number of
days after the date of publication.
(c) If no adverse comment or request
for oral hearing is received by the
Federal Railroad Administration within
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
10088
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the specified time of publication in the
Federal Register, the Federal Railroad
Administration will publish a notice in
the Federal Register indicating that no
adverse comment was received and
confirming that the rule will become
effective on the date that was indicated
in the direct final rule.
(d) If the Federal Railroad
Administration receives any written
adverse comment or request for oral
hearing within the specified time of
publication in the Federal Register, a
notice withdrawing the direct final rule
will be published in the final rule
section of the Federal Register and, if
the Federal Railroad Administration
decides a rulemaking is warranted, a
notice of proposed rulemaking will be
published in the proposed rule section
of the Federal Register.
(e) An ‘‘adverse’’ comment for the
purpose of this subpart means any
comment that the Federal Railroad
Administration determines is critical of
the rule, suggests that the rule should
not be adopted, or suggests a change
that should be made in the rule.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 27,
2007.
Joseph H. Boardman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–3923 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 060425111–6315–03;I.D.
041906B]
RIN 0648–AN09
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Vessel
Monitoring Systems; Amendment 18A
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective
date.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS further delays the
December 7, 2006, effective date of two
sections of a final rule, published
August 9, 2006, until May 6, 2007. The
amendments to those sections will
require owners/operators of vessels with
Gulf reef fish commercial vessel permits
to install a NMFS-approved vessel
monitoring system (VMS) and will make
installation of VMS a prerequisite for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Mar 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
permit renewal or transfer. This delay of
the effective date will provide
additional time for resolution of an
unanticipated technological problem
with one of the approved VMS units
purchased by significant portion of the
fleet and will allow vendors additional
time to meet the demand for purchase
and installation of VMS units that are
currently backlogged.
DATES: The effective date of
§§ 622.9(a)(2) and 622.4(m)(1) published
August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45428), is
delayed until May 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements referred to in this final
rule may be submitted in writing to
Jason Rueter, NMFS, Southeast Regional
Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701; telephone 727–
824–5305; fax 727–824–5308; email
Jason.Rueter@noaa.gov and to David
Rostker, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), by e-mail at
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax
to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Hood, telephone 727–824–5305,
fax 727–824–5308, e-mail
Peter.Hood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final rule to implement
Amendment 18A to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Reef Fish
Resources of the Gulf of Mexico
(Amendment 18A) (71 FR 45428,
August 9, 2006) included a provision,
§ 622.9(a)(2), requiring owners or
operators of a vessel with a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish,
including charter/headboats with
commercial reef fish vessel permits even
when under charter, to be equipped
with an operating VMS approved by
NMFS for the Gulf of Mexico reef fish
fishery. Additionally, § 622.4(m)(1)
required proof of purchase, installation,
activation, and operational status of an
approved VMS for renewal or transfer of
a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish.
Subsequent to the publication of the
final rule, NMFS published a notice
listing VMS approved by NMFS for use
in the Gulf reef fish fishery (71 FR
54472, September 15, 2006). On October
31, 2006, NMFS published a notice (71
FR 63753), announcing availability of
grant funds to reimburse owners and
operators of vessels subject to the VMS
requirements of Amendment 18A for the
equivalent cost of purchasing the least
expensive VMS approved by NMFS for
the Gulf reef fish fishery. On December
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6, 2006, because of concerns that fishers
would not have sufficient time to
comply with the VMS requirements,
NMFS published a notice (71 FR 70680)
to delay the effective date of
§ 622.9(a)(2), the VMS requirement, and
§ 622.4(m)(1), the provision requiring
VMS as a condition of renewing or
transferring a commercial vessel permit
for Gulf reef fish.
Further Delay of Effective Date
NMFS is further delaying, until May
6, 2007, the effective date of
§ 622.9(a)(2), the VMS requirement, and
§ 622.4(m)(1), the provision requiring
VMS as a condition of renewing or
transferring a commercial vessel permit
for Gulf reef fish. NMFS recently
learned, and has confirmed with the
VMS vendor, that there is a
technological problem with one of the
approved VMS units that has been
purchased by a significant portion of the
commercial reef fish fleet. This VMS
unit, as currently configured, has an
excessive power draw. When the vessel
is not under power or does not have
access to an external power source for
longer than about 48 hours, the power
draw from this VMS unit can drain all
battery power, resulting in failure of
electronic equipment including such
safety equipment as bilge pumps. The
vendor is working with vessel owners to
resolve this issue through a
reconfiguration of the VMS installation.
NMFS has determined that a 60-day
delay in implementation of the VMS
requirements should be sufficient to
resolve this issue. NMFS has also
confirmed that providers of approved
VMS units have a substantial backlog of
orders for approved VMS units. It would
not be possible for all affected fishers to
acquire, install, and activate the
required VMS units prior to the current
March 7, 2007 deadline. Therefore, for
these reasons, NMFS is delaying the
effective date of §§ 622.9(a)(2) and
622.4(m)(1) until May 6, 2007.
Classification
The Administrator, Southeast Region,
NMFS, (RA) has determined that
delaying the effective date of VMS
requirements for vessels with
commercial vessel permits for Gulf reef
fish is necessary for management of the
fishery and to minimize adverse social
and economic impacts. The RA has also
determined that this rule is consistent
with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10086-10088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3923]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 211
[Docket No. 2006-24141, Notice No. 2]
RIN 2130-AB77
Rules of Practice: Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In October 2006, FRA proposed to amend its rules of practice
by adopting direct final rulemaking procedures intended to expedite the
publication of routine or noncontroversial changes. FRA received no
comments to this proposal, and in this rule adopts its proposed direct
final rulemaking procedures without change.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 6, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia V. Sun, Trial Attorney, Mail
Stop 10, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005 (telephone: (202) 493-6038).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 11, 2006, FRA proposed to amend its Rules of Practice
(49 CFR Part 211) to adopt direct final rulemaking procedures which
would expedite its rulemaking process for noncontroversial regulatory
changes to which no adverse comment was anticipated (71 FR 59698). The
proposed direct final rulemaking procedures, closely modeled upon those
of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) (January 30,
2004, 69 FR 4455), would allow FRA to reduce the time necessary to
develop, review, clear and publish routine rules to which no adverse
public comment was anticipated by eliminating the requirement to
publish separate
[[Page 10087]]
proposed and final rules. FRA received no comments to the proposal, and
in this rule adopts its proposed direct final rulemaking procedures
without change.
Other agencies, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Food
and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, the
Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Energy (DOE) have
adopted and successfully used direct final rulemaking procedures for
routine changes. The DOE, for example, amended its test procedures for
measuring the energy consumption of clothes washers through a direct
final rule (October 31, 2003, 68 FR 62197).
The Direct Final Rulemaking Process
As mentioned above, proceeding through a direct final rulemaking
enables FRA to eliminate an unnecessary second round of internal review
and clearance, as well as public review, for noncontroversial proposed
rules. As proposed, FRA may use direct final rulemaking for
noncontroversial rules, including those that:
(1) Affect internal procedures of the Federal Railroad
Administration, such as filing requirements and rules governing
inspection and copying of documents,
(2) Are nonsubstantive clarifications or corrections to existing
rules;
(3) Update existing forms; and
(4) Make minor changes in substantive rules regarding statistics
and reporting requirements, such as a lessening of the reporting
frequency (for example, from monthly to quarterly) or elimination of a
type of data that FRA no longer needs to collect.
FRA may also use direct final rulemaking process for a particular
rule if similar rules had been previously proposed and published
without adverse comment.
If FRA determines that a rule is appropriate for direct final
rulemaking, FRA will publish the rule in the final rule section of the
Federal Register. In a direct final rule document, the ``action'' will
be captioned ``direct final rule'' and will include language in the
summary and preamble informing interested parties of their right to
comment and their right to request an oral hearing, if such opportunity
is required. The direct final rule notice will advise the public that
FRA anticipates no adverse comment to the rule and that the rule will
become effective a specified number of days after the date of
publication unless FRA receives written adverse comment or a request
for an oral hearing (if such opportunity is required by statute) within
the specified comment period. An ``adverse'' comment is one that is
critical of the rule, suggests that the rule should not be adopted, or
suggests that a change should be made in the rule. FRA will not
consider a comment submitted in support of the rule, or a request for
clarification of the rule, to be adverse. FRA will provide sufficient
comment time to allow interested parties to determine whether they wish
or need to submit adverse comments, and will answer any requests for
clarification while the comment period is running. If FRA receives no
written adverse comment or request for oral hearing within the comment
period, FRA will publish another notice in the Federal Register
indicating that no adverse comment has been received and confirming
that the rule will become effective on the specified date.
If, however, FRA receives the timely submission of an adverse
comment or notice of intent to submit adverse comment, FRA will stop
the direct final rulemaking process and withdraw the direct final rule
by publishing a notice in the final rule section of the Federal
Register. If FRA decides that the rulemaking remains necessary, FRA
will recommence the rulemaking under its standard rulemaking procedures
by publishing a notice proposing the rule in the proposed rules section
of the Federal Register. The proposed rule will provide for a new
public comment period.
The additional time and effort required to withdraw the direct
final rule and issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be an
incentive for FRA to act conservatively in evaluating whether to use
the direct final rulemaking process for a particular rule. FRA will not
use direct final rulemaking for complex or potentially controversial
matters.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
FRA has determined that this action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866 or under the Department's Regulatory
Policies and Procedures. There are no costs associated with the
proposed rule. There will be some cost savings in Federal Register
publication costs and efficiencies for the public and FRA personnel in
eliminating duplicative reviews. FRA certifies that this rule will not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
FRA does not believe there are sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. Because this rule
does not have tribal implications and does not impose direct compliance
costs, the funding and consultation requirements of Executive Order
13175 (``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments'') do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information collection requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
FRA has determined that the requirements of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 do not apply to this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 211
Administrative practice and procedure, Rules of practice.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, FRA amends 49 CFR part 211 as
follows:
PART 211--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 211 is amended to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 20103, 20107, 20114, 20306, 20502-20504,
and 49 CFR 1.49.
0
2. In part 211, subpart B--Rulemaking Procedures, is amended by adding
a new section 211.33, Direct final rulemaking procedures, as follows:
Sec. 211.33 Direct final rulemaking procedures.
(a) Rules that the Administrator judges to be noncontroversial and
unlikely to result in adverse public comment may be published in the
final rule section of the Federal Register as direct final rules. These
include noncontroversial rules that:
(1) Affect internal procedures of the Federal Railroad
Administration, such as filing requirements and rules governing
inspection and copying of documents,
(2) Are nonsubstantive clarifications or corrections to existing
rules,
(3) Update existing forms, and
(4) Make minor changes in the substantive rules regarding
statistics and reporting requirements.
(b) The Federal Register document will state that any adverse
comment or notice of intent to submit adverse comment must be received
in writing by the Federal Railroad Administration within the specified
time after the date of publication and that, if no written adverse
comment or request for oral hearing (if such opportunity is required by
statute) is received, the rule will become effective a specified number
of days after the date of publication.
(c) If no adverse comment or request for oral hearing is received
by the Federal Railroad Administration within
[[Page 10088]]
the specified time of publication in the Federal Register, the Federal
Railroad Administration will publish a notice in the Federal Register
indicating that no adverse comment was received and confirming that the
rule will become effective on the date that was indicated in the direct
final rule.
(d) If the Federal Railroad Administration receives any written
adverse comment or request for oral hearing within the specified time
of publication in the Federal Register, a notice withdrawing the direct
final rule will be published in the final rule section of the Federal
Register and, if the Federal Railroad Administration decides a
rulemaking is warranted, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be
published in the proposed rule section of the Federal Register.
(e) An ``adverse'' comment for the purpose of this subpart means
any comment that the Federal Railroad Administration determines is
critical of the rule, suggests that the rule should not be adopted, or
suggests a change that should be made in the rule.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 27, 2007.
Joseph H. Boardman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-3923 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
