Cotton Research and Promotion Program: Determination of Whether To Conduct a Referendum Regarding 1990 Amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion Act, 9918-9919 [E7-3828]
Download as PDF
9918
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 43
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Doc. No. AMS–CN–07–0020; CN–07–004]
Cotton Research and Promotion
Program: Determination of Whether To
Conduct a Referendum Regarding
1990 Amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Act
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
Department’s view, based on a review
by the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS), that it is not necessary to
conduct a referendum among producers
and importers on continuation of the
1990 amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Act (Act). The
1990 amendments require the Secretary
of Agriculture, once every 5 years, to
conduct a review to determine whether
to hold a referendum. The two major
changes to the Cotton Research and
Promotion Program made by the 1990
amendments were the elimination of
assessment refunds to producers and a
new assessment levied on imported
cotton and the cotton content of
imported products. Although USDA is
of the view that a referendum is not
needed, it will initiate a sign-up period
as required by the Act, to allow cotton
producers and importers to request a
referendum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shethir Riva, Chief, Cotton Research
and Promotion Staff, Cotton Program,
AMS, USDA, STOP 0224, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0224,
Telephone (202) 720–2259, Facsimile
(202) 690–1718 or E-mail
Shethir.Riva@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In July
1991, the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) implemented the 1990
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Mar 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
amendments to the Cotton Research and
Promotion Act (Act). These
amendments provided for: (1) Importer
representation on the Cotton Board by
an appropriate number of persons to be
determined by the Secretary who import
cotton or cotton products into the
United States (U.S.) and are selected by
the Secretary from nominations
submitted by importer organizations
certified by the Secretary of Agriculture;
(2) assessments levied on imported
cotton and cotton products at a rate
determined in the same manner as for
U.S. cotton; (3) increasing the amount
the Secretary can be reimbursed for
conducting a referendum from $200,000
to $300,000; (4) reimbursing government
agencies who assist in administering the
collection of assessments on imported
cotton and cotton products; and (5)
terminating the right of producers to
demand a refund of assessments.
Results of the initial July 1991
referendum showed that of the 46,220
valid ballots received; 27,879 or 60
percent of the persons voting, favored
the amendments to the Cotton Research
and Promotion Order (Order), and
18,341 or 40 percent opposed the
amendments. AMS developed
implementing regulations for the import
assessment effective August 1, 1992, the
elimination of the producer refund
effective September 1, 1991, and
provided for importer representation on
the Cotton Board effective January 1,
1993.
In 1996 and 2001, USDA issued the
results of its 5-year reviews of the
Cotton Research and Promotion
Program. In both reviews, the
Department prepared reports that
described the impact of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program on the
cotton industry and the views of those
receiving its benefits, and in both
instances, USDA announced its view
not to conduct a referendum regarding
the 1991 amendments to the Order (61
FR 52772 and 67 FR 1714) and
subsequently held sign-up periods for
all eligible persons to request a
continuance referendum on the 1990
Act amendments. The results of both
respective sign-up periods did not meet
the criteria as established by the Act for
a continuance referendum and,
therefore, referenda were not conducted.
In 2006, the Department again
prepared a 5-year report that described
the impact of the Cotton Research and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Promotion Program on the cotton
industry. The review report is available
upon written request to the Chief of the
Cotton Research and Promotion Staff at
the address provided above. Comments
were solicited from all interested parties
including from persons who pay the
assessments as well as from
organizations representing cotton
producers and importers (71 FR 13808;
March 17, 2006). Economic data was
also reviewed in order to report on the
general climate of the cotton industry.
Finally, a number of independent
sources of information were reviewed to
help identify perspectives from outside
the program including the results of
independent program evaluations
assessing the effects of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program
activities on demand for Upland cotton,
return-on-investment to cotton
producers, the benefit-cost ratio to
companies who import cotton products
and raw cotton, and the overall rate-ofreturn and qualitative benefits and
returns associated with the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program.
The review report cited that the 1990
amendments to the Act were
successfully implemented and are
operating as intended. The report also
noted that there is a general consensus
within the cotton industry that the
Cotton Research and Promotion Program
and the 1990 amendments to the Act are
operating as intended. Written
comments, economic data, and results
from independent evaluations support
this conclusion. Industry comments
cited examples of how the additional
funding has yielded benefits by
increasing the demand and
consumption for cotton. Of the 15
comments received, only one
commenter, who represents cotton
importers, argued for a referendum on
the 1990 Act amendments.
USDA found no compelling reason to
conduct a referendum regarding the
1990 Act amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Order although
some program participants support a
referendum. Therefore, USDA will
allow all eligible persons to request the
conduct of a continuance referendum on
the 1990 amendments through a sign-up
period. Eligible producers and importers
may sign-up to request such a
referendum at the county office of the
Farm Service Agency (FSA), or by
mailing such a request to FSA. The
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 6, 2007 / Notices
Secretary will conduct a referendum if
requested by 10 percent or more of the
number of cotton producers and
importers voting in the most recent
referendum (July 1991), with not more
than 20 percent of such request from
producers in one state or importers of
cotton.
Currently, procedures for the conduct
of a sign-up period appear at 7 CFR
1205.10–1205.30. These procedures will
be updated as appropriate prior to the
beginning of the sign-up period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101–2118.
Signed: February 28, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3828 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, e-mail address,
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax
number, (202) 395–7285.
Dated: March 1, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–3875 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
9919
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, e-mail address,
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax
number, (202) 395–7285.
Dated: March 1, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–3876 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce (DOC)
will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS).
Title: Request for Special Priorities
Assistance.
Agency Form Number: BIS–999.
OMB Approval Number: 0694–0057.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection of
information.
Burden: 600 hours.
Average Time per Response: 30
minutes.
Number of Respondents: 1,200.
Needs and Uses: The information
collected on BIS–999 from defense
contractors and suppliers, is required
for the enforcement and administration
of the Defense Production Act and the
Selective Service Act to provide Special
Priorities Assistance under the Defense
Priorities and Allocation System
Regulations.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households, business or other for-profit
organizations.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Mar 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Department of Commerce (DOC)
will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS).
Title: Defense Priorities and
Allocation System.
Agency Form Number: None.
OMB Approval Number: 0694–0053.
Type of Request: Renewal of an
existing collection of information.
Burden: 14,477 hours.
Average Time per Response: 1 to 31.5
minutes.
Number of Respondents: 700,000
respondents.
Needs and Uses: The record keeping
requirement is necessary for
administration and enforcement of
delegated authority under the Defense
Production Act of 1950, as amended (50
U.S.C. App. 2061, et seq.) and the
Selective Service Act of 1948 (50 U.S.C.
App. 468). Any person who receives a
priority rated order under the
implementing DPAS regulation (15 CFR
part 700) must retain records for at least
3 years.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households, business or other for-profit
organizations.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Department of Commerce (DOC)
will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS).
Title: License Exception,
Humanitarian Donations.
Agency Form Number: None.
OMB Approval Number: 0694–0033.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection of
information.
Burden: 10 hours.
Average Time per Response: 5 hours.
Number of Respondents: 2.
Needs and Uses: Section 7(g) of the
EAA, as amended by the Export
Administration Amendments Act of
1985 (Pub. L. 99–64), exempts from
foreign policy controls exports of
donations to meet basic human needs.
Since the re-write of the Export
Administration Regulations, an exporter
is permitted to ship humanitarian goods
identified in Supplement 2 to Part 740,
to embargoed destinations using the
new License Exception procedures. This
regulation reduces the regulatory
burden on the exporters by enabling
them to make humanitarian donations
with only minimal recordkeeping.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households, business or other for-profit
organizations, and not-for-profit
institutions.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9918-9919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3828]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 6, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 9918]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Doc. No. AMS-CN-07-0020; CN-07-004]
Cotton Research and Promotion Program: Determination of Whether
To Conduct a Referendum Regarding 1990 Amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Act
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the Department's view, based on a review
by the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), that it is not necessary
to conduct a referendum among producers and importers on continuation
of the 1990 amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion Act (Act).
The 1990 amendments require the Secretary of Agriculture, once every 5
years, to conduct a review to determine whether to hold a referendum.
The two major changes to the Cotton Research and Promotion Program made
by the 1990 amendments were the elimination of assessment refunds to
producers and a new assessment levied on imported cotton and the cotton
content of imported products. Although USDA is of the view that a
referendum is not needed, it will initiate a sign-up period as required
by the Act, to allow cotton producers and importers to request a
referendum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shethir Riva, Chief, Cotton Research
and Promotion Staff, Cotton Program, AMS, USDA, STOP 0224, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0224, Telephone (202)
720-2259, Facsimile (202) 690-1718 or E-mail Shethir.Riva@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In July 1991, the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) implemented the 1990 amendments to the Cotton Research
and Promotion Act (Act). These amendments provided for: (1) Importer
representation on the Cotton Board by an appropriate number of persons
to be determined by the Secretary who import cotton or cotton products
into the United States (U.S.) and are selected by the Secretary from
nominations submitted by importer organizations certified by the
Secretary of Agriculture; (2) assessments levied on imported cotton and
cotton products at a rate determined in the same manner as for U.S.
cotton; (3) increasing the amount the Secretary can be reimbursed for
conducting a referendum from $200,000 to $300,000; (4) reimbursing
government agencies who assist in administering the collection of
assessments on imported cotton and cotton products; and (5) terminating
the right of producers to demand a refund of assessments.
Results of the initial July 1991 referendum showed that of the
46,220 valid ballots received; 27,879 or 60 percent of the persons
voting, favored the amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion
Order (Order), and 18,341 or 40 percent opposed the amendments. AMS
developed implementing regulations for the import assessment effective
August 1, 1992, the elimination of the producer refund effective
September 1, 1991, and provided for importer representation on the
Cotton Board effective January 1, 1993.
In 1996 and 2001, USDA issued the results of its 5-year reviews of
the Cotton Research and Promotion Program. In both reviews, the
Department prepared reports that described the impact of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program on the cotton industry and the views of
those receiving its benefits, and in both instances, USDA announced its
view not to conduct a referendum regarding the 1991 amendments to the
Order (61 FR 52772 and 67 FR 1714) and subsequently held sign-up
periods for all eligible persons to request a continuance referendum on
the 1990 Act amendments. The results of both respective sign-up periods
did not meet the criteria as established by the Act for a continuance
referendum and, therefore, referenda were not conducted.
In 2006, the Department again prepared a 5-year report that
described the impact of the Cotton Research and Promotion Program on
the cotton industry. The review report is available upon written
request to the Chief of the Cotton Research and Promotion Staff at the
address provided above. Comments were solicited from all interested
parties including from persons who pay the assessments as well as from
organizations representing cotton producers and importers (71 FR 13808;
March 17, 2006). Economic data was also reviewed in order to report on
the general climate of the cotton industry. Finally, a number of
independent sources of information were reviewed to help identify
perspectives from outside the program including the results of
independent program evaluations assessing the effects of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program activities on demand for Upland cotton,
return-on-investment to cotton producers, the benefit-cost ratio to
companies who import cotton products and raw cotton, and the overall
rate-of-return and qualitative benefits and returns associated with the
Cotton Research and Promotion Program.
The review report cited that the 1990 amendments to the Act were
successfully implemented and are operating as intended. The report also
noted that there is a general consensus within the cotton industry that
the Cotton Research and Promotion Program and the 1990 amendments to
the Act are operating as intended. Written comments, economic data, and
results from independent evaluations support this conclusion. Industry
comments cited examples of how the additional funding has yielded
benefits by increasing the demand and consumption for cotton. Of the 15
comments received, only one commenter, who represents cotton importers,
argued for a referendum on the 1990 Act amendments.
USDA found no compelling reason to conduct a referendum regarding
the 1990 Act amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion Order
although some program participants support a referendum. Therefore,
USDA will allow all eligible persons to request the conduct of a
continuance referendum on the 1990 amendments through a sign-up period.
Eligible producers and importers may sign-up to request such a
referendum at the county office of the Farm Service Agency (FSA), or by
mailing such a request to FSA. The
[[Page 9919]]
Secretary will conduct a referendum if requested by 10 percent or more
of the number of cotton producers and importers voting in the most
recent referendum (July 1991), with not more than 20 percent of such
request from producers in one state or importers of cotton.
Currently, procedures for the conduct of a sign-up period appear at
7 CFR 1205.10-1205.30. These procedures will be updated as appropriate
prior to the beginning of the sign-up period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101-2118.
Signed: February 28, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-3828 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P