Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands; 2007 and 2008 Final Harvest Specifications for Groundfish, 9451-9474 [E7-3692]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
component of the Central Regulatory
Area of the GOA will soon be reached.
Therefore, the Regional Administrator is
establishing a directed fishing
allowance of 8,519 mt, and is setting
aside the remaining 2,500 mt as bycatch
to support other anticipated groundfish
fisheries. In accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the Regional
Administrator finds that this directed
fishing allowance has been reached.
Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting
directed fishing for Pacific cod by
vessels catching Pacific cod for
processing by the inshore component in
the Central Regulatory Area of the GOA.
After the effective date of this closure
the maximum retainable amounts at
§ 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time
during a trip.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the closure of Pacific cod
apportioned to vessels catching Pacific
cod for processing by the inshore
component of the Central Regulatory
Area of the GOA. NMFS was unable to
publish a notice providing time for
public comment because the most
recent, relevant data only became
available as of February 23, 2007.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30 day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
This action is required by § 679.20
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: January 26, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 07–954 Filed 2–27–07; 2:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 070213033–7033–01; I.D.
112706A]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands; 2007 and 2008 Final
Harvest Specifications for Groundfish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; closures.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces 2007 and
2008 final harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch (PSC)
allowances for the groundfish fishery of
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
management area (BSAI). This action is
necessary to establish harvest limits for
groundfish during the 2007 and 2008
fishing years and to accomplish the
goals and objectives of the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (FMP). The intended
effect of this action is to conserve and
manage the groundfish resources in the
BSAI in accordance with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA).
DATES: The 2007 and 2008 final harvest
specifications and associated
apportionment of reserves are effective
at 1200 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.),
March 2, 2007, through 2400 hrs, A.l.t.,
December 31, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final Alaska
Groundfish Harvest Specifications
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
Record of Decision (ROD), and Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
prepared for this action are available
from Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box
21668, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian, or from the Alaska Region
Web site at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Copies of the 2006 Stock Assessment
and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report
for the groundfish resources of the
BSAI, dated November 2006, are
available from the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council, West 4th Avenue,
Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99510–2252,
907–271–2809, or from its Web site at
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Furuness, 907–586–7228, or email mary.furuness@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal
regulations at 50 CFR part 679
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9451
implement the FMP and govern the
groundfish fisheries in the BSAI. The
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) prepared the FMP,
and NMFS approved it under the MSA.
General regulations governing U.S.
fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP and its implementing
regulations require NMFS, after
consultation with the Council, to
specify the total allowable catch (TAC)
for each target species and for the ‘‘other
species’’ category, the sum must be
within the optimum yield (OY) range of
1.4 million to 2.0 million metric tons
(mt) (see § 679.20(a)(1)(i)). Also
specified are apportionments of TACs,
and Community Development Quota
(CDQ) reserve amounts, PSC
allowances, and prohibited species
quota (PSQ) reserve amounts. The final
harvest specifications listed in Tables 1
through 15 of this action satisfy these
requirements. For 2007 and 2008, the
sum of TACs for each year is 2 million
mt.
Section 679.20(c)(3) further requires
NMFS to consider public comment on
the proposed annual TACs and
apportionments thereof and the
proposed PSC allowances, and to
publish final harvest specifications in
the Federal Register. The 2007 and 2008
proposed harvest specifications and PSC
allowances for the groundfish fishery of
the BSAI were published in the Federal
Register on December 15, 2006 (71 FR
75460). Comments were invited and
accepted through January 16, 2007.
NMFS received 4 letters with several
comments on the proposed harvest
specifications. These comments are
summarized and responded to in the
Response to Comments section of this
rule. NMFS consulted with the Council
during the December 2006 Council
meeting in Anchorage, AK. After
considering public comments, as well as
biological and economic data that were
available at the Council’s December
meeting, NMFS is implementing the
2007 and 2008 final harvest
specifications as recommended by the
Council.
Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) and
TAC Harvest Specifications
The final ABC levels are based on the
best available biological and
socioeconomic information, including
projected biomass trends, information
on assumed distribution of stock
biomass, and revised technical methods
used to calculate stock biomass. In
general, the development of ABCs and
overfishing levels (OFLs) involves
sophisticated statistical analyses of fish
populations and is based on a
successive series of six levels, or tiers,
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
9452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
of reliable information available to
fishery scientists. Tier 1 represents the
highest level of data quality and tier 6
the lowest level of data quality
available.
In December 2006, the Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC), Advisory
Panel (AP), and Council reviewed
current biological information about the
condition of the BSAI groundfish stocks.
The Council’s Plan Team compiled and
presented this information in the 2006
SAFE report for the BSAI groundfish
fisheries, dated November 2006. The
SAFE report contains a review of the
latest scientific analyses and estimates
of each species’ biomass and other
biological parameters, as well as
summaries of the available information
on the BSAI ecosystem and the
economic condition of groundfish
fisheries off Alaska. The SAFE report is
available for public review (see
ADDRESSES). From these data and
analyses, the Plan Team estimates an
OFL and ABC for each species or
species category.
In December 2006 the SSC, AP, and
Council reviewed the Plan Team’s
recommendations. Except for Bering Sea
subarea and Aleutian Islands (AI)
subarea pollock, yellowfin sole, rock
sole, and the ‘‘other species’’ category,
the SSC, AP, and Council endorsed the
Plan Team’s ABC recommendations. For
2007 and 2008, the SSC recommended
higher pollock OFLs and ABCs than the
OFLs and ABCs recommended by the
Plan Team. For Bering Sea subarea
pollock, the SSC recommended using a
procedure that sets the ABCs at the F40%
level which results in ABCs lower than
the maximum permissible, but higher
than the Plan Teams recommendations.
For AI subarea pollock, the SSC
recommended using tier 3 management
which results in maximum permissible
ABCs and OFLs higher than the tier 5
management recommended by the Plan
Team. For yellowfin sole and rock sole,
the SSC recommended using tier 1
management which results in maximum
permissible ABCs and OFLs higher than
the tier 3 management recommended by
the Plan Team. For ‘‘other species,’’ the
SSC recommended using tier 6
management for shark and octopus
species resulting in lower ABCs than the
Plan Team’s recommended tier 5
management. The SSC provided 2007
and 2008 ABC and OFL amounts
obtained as the sum of the individual
species ABCs in the ‘‘other species’’
category since the current FMP specifies
management at the group level. For all
species, the AP endorsed the ABCs
recommended by the SSC, and the
Council adopted them.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Plan Team, SSC, AP and Council
recommended that total removals of
Pacific cod from the BSAI not exceed
ABC recommendations. In 2006, the
Board of Fisheries for the State of
Alaska (State) established a guideline
harvest level (GHL) west of 170 degrees
west longitude in the AI subarea equal
to 3 percent of the Pacific cod ABC in
the BSAI. Accordingly, the Council
recommended that the 2007 and 2008
TACs be adjusted downward from the
ABCs by amounts equal to the 2007 and
2008 GHLs.
The final TAC recommendations were
based on the ABCs as adjusted for other
biological and socioeconomic
considerations, including maintaining
the sum of the TACs within the required
OY range of 1.4 million to 2.0 million
mt. The Council adopted the AP’s 2007
and 2008 TAC recommendations. None
of the Council’s recommended TACs for
2007 or 2008 exceeds the final 2007 or
2008 ABC for any species category. The
2007 and 2008 harvest specifications
approved by the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary) are unchanged from those
recommended by the Council and are
consistent with the preferred harvest
strategy alternative in the EIS. The 2007
and 2008 TACs are less than the
maximum permissible ABCs
recommended by the Council’s plan
teams and SSC. NMFS finds that the
recommended OFLs, ABCs, and TACs
are consistent with the biological
condition of groundfish stocks as
described in the 2006 SAFE report that
was approved by the Council.
Other Rules Affecting the 2007 and
2008 Harvest Specifications
The following paragraphs identify
actions that are currently under
consideration by the Council and that,
if submitted to and approved by the
Secretary, could change the 2007 and
2008 final harvest specifications. The
existing 2007 harvest specifications will
be updated in early 2007 when final
harvest specifications for 2007 and new
harvest specifications for 2008 are
implemented. The 2008 harvest
specifications will be updated in early
2008, when new harvest specifications
for 2008 and 2009 are implemented.
In April 2006, the Council adopted
Amendment 85 to the FMP.
Amendment 85 would revise the BSAI
Pacific cod sector allocations. If
approved by the Secretary, final
regulations implementing Amendment
85 are anticipated to be effective for the
2008 fishing year. The notice of
availability of Amendment 85 to the
FMP was published December 7, 2006
(71 FR 70943), and the comment period
ended February 5, 2007. In June 2006
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Council adopted Amendment 80 to
the FMP. Amendment 80 would provide
specific groundfish allocations to the
non-American Fisheries Act (AFA)
trawl catcher/processor sector and allow
the formation of cooperatives. If
approved by the Secretary, final
regulations implementing Amendment
80 also are anticipated to be effective for
the 2008 fishing year. The Council also
adopted Amendment 84 that would
modify current regulations for managing
incidental catch of Chinook and chum
salmon and may change the PSC limits.
The Council also is considering two
proposals. One would allocate the
Pacific cod TAC by Bering Sea subarea
and AI subarea instead of a combined
BSAI TAC. The other would separate
some species from the ‘‘other rockfish’’
or ‘‘other species’’ categories to establish
individual OFLs, ABCs, and TACs.
Changes From the 2007 and 2008
Proposed Harvest Specifications in the
BSAI
In October 2006 the Council’s
recommendations for the 2007 and 2008
proposed harvest specifications (71 FR
75460, December 15, 2006) were based
largely on information contained in the
2005 SAFE report for the BSAI
groundfish fisheries, dated November
2005. The Council recommended that
OFLs and ABCs for stocks in tiers 1
through 3 be based on biomass
projections as set forth in the 2005
SAFE report and estimates of groundfish
harvests through the 2006 fishing year.
For stocks in tiers 4 through 6, for
which biomass projections could not be
made, the Council recommended that
OFLs and ABCs be unchanged from
2006 until the 2006 SAFE report could
be completed. The 2006 SAFE report
(dated November 2006), which was not
available when the Council made its
recommendations in October 2006,
contains the best and most recent
scientific information on the condition
of the groundfish stocks. In December
2006, the Council considered the 2006
SAFE report in making its
recommendations for the 2007 and 2008
final harvest specifications. Based on
the 2006 SAFE report, the sum of the
2007 and 2008 recommended final
TACs for the BSAI (2,000,000 mt) is the
same as the sum of the 2007 and 2008
proposed TACs. Compared to the 2007
and 2008 proposed harvest
specifications, the Council’s 2006 final
TAC recommendations increase fishing
opportunities for fishermen and
economic benefits to the nation for
species for which the Council had
sufficient information to raise TAC
levels. These species include BSAI
flathead sole, Pacific cod, sablefish,
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yellowfin sole, ‘‘other flatfish,’’ Pacific
ocean perch, northern rockfish, ‘‘other
rockfish,’’ and squid. Conversely, the
Council reduced TAC levels to provide
greater protection for several species
including Bering Sea subarea pollock,
rock sole, Greenland turbot, shortraker
rockfish, rougheye rockfish, and ‘‘other
species.’’ The changes recommended by
the Council were based on the best
scientific information available,
consistent with National Standard 2 of
9453
the MSA, and within a reasonable range
of variation from the proposed TAC
recommendations so that the affected
public was fairly apprised and could
make meaningful comments.
COMPARISON OF FINAL 2007 AND 2008 WITH PROPOSED 2007 AND 2008 TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH IN THE BSAI
2007 final
TAC
2007 proposed TAC
2007 final
minus
proposed
2008 final
TAC
2008 proposed TAC
2008 final
minus
proposed
Species
Area
Pollock ...................................
Squid .....................................
Other species ........................
BS ................................
AI ..................................
Bogoslof .......................
BSAI .............................
BS ................................
AI ..................................
EAI/BS .........................
CAI ...............................
WAI ..............................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
BS ................................
AI ..................................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
BS ................................
EAI ...............................
CAI ...............................
WAI ..............................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
BS ................................
AI ..................................
BSAI .............................
BSAI .............................
1,394,000
19,000
10
170,720
2,980
2,810
23,800
29,600
9,600
136,000
55,000
1,680
760
20,000
30,000
10,000
25,000
2,160
4,970
5,050
7,720
8,190
424
202
414
585
1,970
37,355
1,419,800
19,000
10
144,045
2,580
2,620
16,782
38,718
7,500
117,100
85,736
1,815
815
20,000
22,000
5,000
32,000
3,020
3,322
3,277
5,481
5,000
580
224
810
590
1,275
40,900
¥25,800
0
0
26,675
400
190
7,018
¥9,118
2,100
18,900
¥30,736
¥135
¥55
0
8,000
5,000
¥7,000
¥860
1,648
1,773
2,239
3,190
¥156
¥22
¥396
¥5
695
¥3,545
1,318,000
19,000
10
127,070
2,970
2,800
17,600
22,000
15,300
150,000
75,000
1,720
770
30,000
45,000
21,400
60,000
4,080
4,900
5,000
7,620
8,150
424
202
414
585
1,970
58,015
1,168,700
19,000
10
118,049
2,240
2,260
24,481
27,728
12,891
106,400
111,600
1,815
815
144,800
52,200
18,100
129,637
3,020
3,322
3,277
5,481
5,000
580
224
810
590
1,970
35,000
149,300
0
0
9,021
730
540
*¥6,881
¥5,728
2,409
43,600
¥36,600
¥95
¥45
¥114,800
¥7,200
3,300
¥69,637
1,060
1,578
1,723
2,139
3,150
¥156
¥22
¥396
¥5
0
23,015
Total ...............................
......................................
2,000,000
2,000,000
0
2,000,000
2,000,000
0
Pacific cod .............................
Sablefish ................................
Atka mackerel ........................
Yellowfin sole ........................
Rock sole ...............................
Greenland turbot ...................
Arrowtooth flounder ...............
Flathead sole .........................
Other flatfish ..........................
Alaska plaice .........................
Pacific ocean perch ...............
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Northern rockfish ...................
Shortraker rockfish ................
Rougheye rockfish .................
Other rockfish ........................
As mentioned in the 2007 and 2008
proposed harvest specifications, NMFS
is apportioning the amounts shown in
Table 2 from the non-specified reserve
to increase the initial TAC (ITAC) of
several target species.
NMFS is revising the BSAI species
that will be allocated to the CDQ
Program to include Bering Sea pollock,
AI pollock, Pacific cod, sablefish from
both the fixed gear and trawl gear
allocations, Atka mackerel, yellowfin
sole, rock sole, Bering Sea Greenland
turbot, arrowtooth flounder, flathead
sole, and AI Pacific ocean perch. This
differs from the suite of species that
NMFS proposed to allocate to the CDQ
Program, as described in the 2007 and
2008 proposed harvest specifications
(71 FR 75460, December 15, 2006).
NMFS originally proposed, in addition
to the species listed above, allocating AI
Greenland turbot, ‘‘other flatfish,’’ and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Alaska plaice to the CDQ Program.
NMFS also proposed to not allocate
sablefish from the trawl allocation to the
CDQ Program.
Furthermore, NMFS is increasing the
2008 CDQ reserve allocations in Table 1
to 10.7 percent from 7.5 percent, except
for pollock and sablefish. The statutory
requirements and agency determination
for changing the suite of species and
percentage allocations made to the CDQ
Program are described both in the 2007
and 2008 proposed harvest
specifications and in the response to
Comment 3 in the Response to
Comments section of this action.
Catch in the CDQ fisheries of species
in TAC categories that are not allocated
to the CDQ Program will be managed
under the regulations and fishery status
that applies to the TAC category in the
non-CDQ groundfish fisheries.
Retention of species closed to directed
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
fishing will either be limited to
maximum retainable amounts or all
catch of the species will be required to
be discarded. Notices of closures to
directed fishing and retention
requirements for these species will
apply to the CDQ and non-CDQ sectors.
The catch of these species in the CDQ
fisheries would not constrain the catch
of other CDQ species unless catch by all
sectors approached an OFL.
The 2007 and 2008 final TAC
recommendations for the BSAI are
within the OY range established for the
BSAI and do not exceed ABCs for any
single species or complex. Table 1 lists
the 2007 and 2008 final OFL, ABC,
TAC, ITAC, and CDQ reserve amounts
of the BSAI groundfish. The
apportionment of TAC amounts among
fisheries and seasons is discussed
below.
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
3,188,973
1,640,000
54,500
48,000
207,000
3,520
3,320
86,900
n/a
n/a
n/a
240,000
200,000
15,600
n/a
n/a
193,000
95,300
28,500
241,000
26,100
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9,750
564
269
1,330
n/a
n/a
2,620
91,700
OFL
2,676,035
1,394,000
44,500
5,220
176,000
2,980
2,810
74,000
23,800
29,600
20,600
225,000
198,000
2,440
1,680
760
158,000
79,200
21,400
190,000
21,900
4,160
4,970
5,050
7,720
8,190
424
202
999
414
585
1,970
68,800
ABC
2,000,000
1,394,000
19,000
10
170,720
2,980
2,810
63,000
23,800
29,600
9,600
136,000
55,000
2,440
1,680
760
20,000
30,000
10,000
25,000
19,900
2,160
4,970
5,050
7,720
8,190
424
202
999
414
585
1,970
37,355
TAC
2007
1,770,474
1,254,600
17,100
10
145,112
2,458
2,284
53,550
20,230
25,160
8,160
115,600
46,750
2,074
1,428
646
17,000
25,500
8,500
21,250
16,915
1,836
4,225
4,293
6,562
6,962
360
172
849
352
497
1,675
31,752
ITAC 2
179,245
139,400
1,900
0
12,804
410
474
4,725
1,785
2,220
720
10,200
4,125
n/a
126
0
1,500
2,250
0
0
n/a
0
373
379
579
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CDQ 3
3,014,973
1,431,000
50,300
48,000
154,000
3,290
3,100
64,200
n/a
n/a
n/a
261,000
271,000
16,000
n/a
n/a
208,000
92,800
28,500
252,000
25,600
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9,700
564
269
1,330
n/a
n/a
2,620
91,700
OFL
2,642,125
1,318,000
41,000
5,220
131,000
2,970
2,800
54,900
17,600
22,000
15,300
245,000
268,000
2,490
1,720
770
171,000
77,200
21,400
199,000
21,600
4,080
4,900
5,000
7,620
8,150
424
202
999
414
585
1,970
68,800
ABC
2,000,000
1,318,000
19,000
10
127,070
2,970
2,800
54,900
17,600
22,000
15,300
150,000
75,000
2,490
1,720
770
30,000
45,000
21,400
60,000
21,600
4,080
4,900
5,000
7,620
8,150
424
202
999
414
585
1,970
58,015
TAC
2008
1,763,808
1,186,200
17,100
10
108,010
1,263
596
46,665
14,960
18,700
13,005
127,500
63,750
2,117
1,462
655
25,500
38,250
18,190
51,000
18,360
3,468
4,165
4,250
6,477
6,928
360
172
849
352
497
1,675
49,313
ITAC 2
187,491
131,800
1,900
0
13,596
111
52
5,874
1,883
2,354
1,637
16,050
8,025
n/a
184
0
3,210
4,815
0
0
n/a
0
524
535
815
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CDQ 3
amounts apply to the entire BSAI management area unless otherwise specified. With the exception of pollock, and for the purpose of these harvest specifications, the Bering Sea
(BS) subarea includes the Bogoslof District.
2 Except for pollock and the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line and pot gear, 15 percent of each TAC is put into a reserve. The ITAC for each species is the remainder
of the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
3 Except for Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot, ‘‘other flatfish,’’ Alaska plaice, Bering Sea Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ‘‘other rockfish,’’
squid, and ‘‘other species,’’ 7.5 percent in 2007 and 10.7 percent in 2008 of the TAC is designated as a CDQ reserve for use by CDQ participants (see §§ 679.20(b)(1)(iii), 679.31, and section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the MSA).
4 Under § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC after subtraction for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and the incidental catch allowance (2.8
percent), is further allocated by sector for a directed pollock fishery as follows: inshore—50 percent; catcher/processor—40 percent; and motherships—10 percent. Under
§ 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual Aleutian Islands subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the incidental
catch allowance (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery.
5 The Pacific cod TAC is reduced by 3 percent from the ABC to account for the State of Alaska’s (State) guideline harvest level in State waters of the Aleutian Islands subarea.
6 Twenty percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line gear or pot gear is reserved for use by CDQ participants (see § 679.20(b)(1)(iii)(B)).
7 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock sole, yellowfin sole, arrowtooth flounder and Alaska plaice.
8 ‘‘Other rockfish’’ includes all Sebastes and Sebastolobus species except for Pacific ocean perch, northern, shortraker, and rougheye rockfish.
9 ‘‘Other species’’ includes sculpins, sharks, skates and octopus. Forage fish, as defined at § 679.2, are not included in the ‘‘other species’’ category.
1 These
Total ..........................
Squid ................................
Other species 9 ................
Northern rockfish .............
Shortraker rockfish ...........
Rougheye rockfish ...........
Other rockfish 8 ................
Arrowtooth flounder .........
Flathead sole ...................
Other flatfish 7 ..................
Alaska plaice ....................
Pacific ocean perch .........
Yellowfin sole ...................
Rock sole .........................
Greenland turbot ..............
Atka mackerel ..................
....................
BS2 ............
AI 2 .............
Bogoslof ....
BSAI ..........
BS ..............
AI ...............
BSAI ..........
EAI/BS .......
CAI ............
WAI ............
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BS ..............
AI ...............
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BS ..............
EAI .............
CAI ............
WAI ............
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
BS ..............
AI ...............
BSAI ..........
BSAI ..........
Pollock 4 ...........................
Pacific cod 5 .....................
Sablefish 6 ........................
Area
Species
[Amounts are in metric tons]
TABLE 1.—2007 AND 2008 OVERFISHING LEVEL (OFL), ACCEPTABLE BIOLOGICAL CATCH (ABC), TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH (TAC), INITIAL TAC (ITAC), AND
CDQ RESERVE ALLOCATION OF GROUNDFISH IN THE BSAI 1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
9454
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
02MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Reserves and the Incidental Catch
Allowance (ICA) for Pollock
Section 679.20(b)(1)(i) of the CFR
requires the placement of 15 percent of
the TAC for each target species or
species group, except for pollock and
the hook-and-line and pot gear
allocation of sablefish, in a nonspecified reserve. Section
679.20(b)(1)(iii)(A) of the CFR and
section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the
MSA further require the allocation of
one-half of each TAC amount that is
placed in the non-specified reserve (7.5
percent of the TAC) in 2007 and 10.7
percent in 2008 be allocated to the
groundfish CDQ reserve with the
exception of Bogoslof pollock, Aleutian
Islands Greenland turbot, ‘‘other
flatfish,’’ Alaska plaice, Bering Sea
Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish,
shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish,
‘‘other rockfish,’’ squid, and ‘‘other
species,’’ as explained above. Section
679.20(b)(1)(iii)(B) requires 20 percent
of the hook-and-line and pot gear
allocation of sablefish be allocated to
the fixed gear sablefish CDQ reserve.
Sections 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A),
679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i), and 679.31(a)
also require the allocation of 10 percent
of the BSAI pollock TACs to the pollock
CDQ directed fishing allowance (DFA).
The entire Bogoslof District pollock
TAC is allocated as an ICA (see
§ 679.20(a)(5)(ii)). With the exception of
the hook-and-line and pot gear sablefish
CDQ reserve, the regulations do not
further apportion the CDQ reserves by
gear. Section 679.21(e)(1)(i) requires
withholding of 7.5 percent of each PSC
limit, with the exception of herring, as
a PSQ reserve for the CDQ fisheries.
Sections 679.30 and 679.31 set forth
regulations governing the management
of the CDQ and PSQ reserves.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1),
NMFS allocates a pollock ICA of 2.8
percent of the Bering Sea subarea
pollock TAC after subtraction of the 10
percent CDQ reserve. This allowance is
based on NMFS’ examination of the
pollock incidental catch, including the
incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in
target fisheries other than pollock from
1999 through 2006. During this 8-year
period, the pollock incidental catch
ranged from a low of 2.4 percent in
2006, to a high of 5 percent in 1999,
with a 7-year average of 3.5 percent.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i)
and (ii), NMFS recommends pollock
ICA of 1,600 mt for AI subarea pollock
after subtraction of the 10 percent CDQ
DFA. This allowance is based on NMFS’
examination of the pollock incidental
catch, including the incidental catch by
CDQ vessels, in target fisheries other
9455
than pollock from 2003 through 2006.
During this 4-year period, the incidental
catch of pollock ranged from a low of 5
percent in 2006 to a high of 10 percent
in 2003, with a 4-year average of 7
percent.
The regulations do not designate the
remainder of the non-specified reserve
by species or species group. Any
amount of the reserve may be
apportioned to a target species or to the
‘‘other species’’ category during the
year, providing that such
apportionments do not result in
overfishing (see § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)). The
Regional Administrator has determined
that the ITACs specified for the species
listed in Table 2 need to be
supplemented from the non-specified
reserve because U.S. fishing vessels
have demonstrated the capacity to catch
the full TAC allocations. Therefore, in
accordance with § 679.20(b)(3), NMFS is
apportioning the amounts shown in
Table 2 from the non-specified reserve
to increase the ITAC by 7.5 percent of
the TAC in 2007. In 2008, northern
rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye
rockfish, and Bering Sea ‘‘other
rockfish’’ are increased by 7.5 percent of
TAC and Atka mackerel, Pacific ocean
perch, and Pacific cod by 4.3 percent of
the TAC.
TABLE 2.—2007 AND 2008 APPORTIONMENT OF RESERVES TO ITAC CATEGORIES
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2007
Reserve
amount
Species—area or subarea
2007 Final
ITAC
2008
Reserve
amount
2008 Final
ITAC
Atka mackerel—Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea ...............................
Atka mackerel—Central Aleutian District ........................................................................
Atka mackerel—Western Aleutian District .......................................................................
Pacific ocean perch—Eastern Aleutian District ...............................................................
Pacific ocean perch—Central Aleutian District ................................................................
Pacific ocean perch—Western Aleutian District ..............................................................
Pacific cod—BSAI ............................................................................................................
Shortraker rockfish—BSAI ...............................................................................................
Rougheye rockfish—BSAI ...............................................................................................
Northern rockfish—BSAI ..................................................................................................
Other rockfish—Bering Sea subarea ...............................................................................
1,785
2,220
720
373
379
579
12,804
32
15
614
31
22,015
27,380
8,880
4,598
4,672
7,141
157,916
392
187
7,576
383
757
946
658
211
215
328
5,464
32
15
611
31
15,717
19,646
13,663
4,376
4,465
6,805
113,474
392
187
7,539
383
Total ..........................................................................................................................
19,552
241,140
9,268
186,647
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Allocation of Pollock TAC Under the
American Fisheries Act (AFA)
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) requires that
the pollock TAC apportioned to the
Bering Sea subarea, after subtraction of
the 10 percent for the CDQ program and
the 2.8 percent for the ICA, be allocated
as a DFA as follows: 50 percent to the
inshore sector, 40 percent to the
catcher/processor sector, and 10 percent
to the mothership sector. In the Bering
Sea subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
allocated to the A season (January 20–
June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the B season (June 10–
November 1). In October 2006, the
State’s Board of Fisheries adopted a
proposal for a 3,000 mt pollock fishery
in State waters of the AI subarea.
However, this action by the State does
not require a downward adjustment of
the Federal AI subarea pollock TAC
because the combined TAC and GHL
(22,000 mt) are less than the proposed
ABC of 44,500 mt. The AI directed
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pollock fishery allocation to the Aleut
Corporation is the amount of pollock
remaining in the AI subarea after
subtracting 1,900 mt for the CDQ DFA
(10 percent) and 1,600 mt for the ICA.
In the AI subarea, 40 percent of the ABC
is allocated to the A season and the
remainder of the directed pollock
fishery is allocated to the B season.
Table 3 lists these 2007 and 2008
amounts.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4) also
includes several specific requirements
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9456
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
regarding pollock allocations. First, 8.5
percent of the pollock allocated to the
catcher/processor sector will be
available for harvest by AFA catcher
vessels with catcher/processor sector
endorsements, unless the Regional
Administrator receives a cooperative
contract that provides for the
distribution of harvest among AFA
catcher/processors and AFA catcher
vessels in a manner agreed to by all
members. Second, AFA catcher/
processors not listed in the AFA are
limited to harvesting not more than 0.5
percent of the pollock allocated to the
catcher/processor sector. Table 3 lists
the 2007 and 2008 allocations of pollock
TAC. Tables 10 through 15 list the AFA
catcher/processor and catcher vessel
harvesting sideboard limits. The tables
for the pollock allocations to the Bering
Sea subarea inshore pollock
cooperatives and open access sector will
be posted on the Alaska Region Web site
at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Table 3 also lists seasonal
apportionments of pollock and harvest
limits within the Steller Sea Lion
Conservation Area (SCA). The harvest
within the SCA, as defined at
§ 679.22(a)(7)(vii), is limited to 28
percent of the annual DFA until April
1. The remaining 12 percent of the 40
percent of the annual DFA allocated to
the A season may be taken outside the
SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA
after April 1. If less than 28 percent of
the annual DFA is taken inside the SCA
before April 1, the remainder will be
available to be taken inside the SCA
after April 1. The A season pollock SCA
harvest limit will be apportioned to
each sector in proportion to each
sector’s allocated percentage of the DFA.
Table 3 lists by sector these 2007 and
2008 amounts.
TABLE 3.—2007 AND 2008 ALLOCATIONS OF POLLOCK TACS TO THE DIRECTED POLLOCK FISHERIES AND TO THE CDQ
DIRECTED FISHING ALLOWANCES (DFA) 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2007 A season 1
2007 Allocations
Area and sector
Bering Sea subarea .........................
CDQ DFA .....................................
ICA 1 ..............................................
AFA Inshore .................................
AFA Catcher/Processors 3 ............
Catch by C/Ps ...........................
Catch by CVs 3 ..........................
Unlisted C/P Limit 4 ...............
AFA Motherships .............................
Excessive Harvesting Limit 5 ............
Excessive Processing Limit 6 ...........
Total Bering Sea DFA ......................
Aleutian Islands subarea 1 ...............
CDQ DFA .....................................
ICA ................................................
Aleut Corporation .........................
Bogoslof District ICA 7 ......................
1,394,000
139,400
35,129
609,736
487,788
446,326
41,462
2,439
121,947
213,407
365,841
1,358,871
19,000
1,900
1,600
15,500
10
A season
DFA
n/a
55,760
n/a
243,894
195,115
178,531
16,585
976
48,779
n/a
n/a
543,548
n/a
760
800
15,500
n/a
2007 B
season 1
SCA harvest limit 2
B season
DFA
n/a
39,032
n/a
170,726
136,581
n/a
n/a
n/a
34,145
n/a
n/a
380,484
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
83,640
n/a
365,841
292,673
267,796
24,877
1,463
73,168
n/a
n/a
815,322
n/a
1,140
800
0
n/a
2008 A season 1
2008 Allocations
1,318,000
131,800
33,214
576,493
461,195
421,993
39,202
2,306
115,299
201,773
345,896
1,284,787
19,000
1,900
1,600
15,500
10
A season
DFA
n/a
52,720
n/a
230,597
184,478
168,797
15,681
922
46,119
n/a
n/a
513,914
n/a
760
800
15,500
n/a
SCA harvest limit 2
n/a
36,904
n/a
161,418
129,134
n/a
n/a
n/a
32,284
n/a
n/a
359,740
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2008 B
season 1
B season
DFA
n/a
79,080
n/a
345,896
276,717
253,196
23,521
1,384
69,179
n/a
n/a
770,872
n/a
1,140
800
0
n/a
1 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), the Bering Sea subarea pollock, after subtraction for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and the ICA (2.8 percent), is
allocated as a DFA as follows: inshore sector—50 percent, catcher/processor sector—40 percent, and mothership sector—10 percent. In the
Bering Sea subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is allocated to the A season (January 20–June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the B
season (June 10–November 1). Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual AI pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second the ICA (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery. In the AI
subarea, the A season is allocated 40 percent of the ABC and the B season is allocated the remainder of the directed pollock fishery.
2 In the Bering Sea subarea, no more than 28 percent of each sector’s annual DFA may be taken from the SCA before April 1. The remaining
12 percent of the annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside of SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If less than
28 percent of the annual DFA is taken inside the SCA before April 1, the remainder will be available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1.
3 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4), not less than 8.5 percent of the DFA allocated to listed catcher/processors shall be available for harvest
only by eligible catcher vessels delivering to listed catcher/processors.
4 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4)(iii), the AFA unlisted catcher/processors are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of the catcher/
processors sector’s allocation of pollock.
5 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6), NMFS establishes an excessive harvesting share limit equal to 17.5 percent of the sum of the pollock
DFAs.
6 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7), NMFS establishes an excessive processing share limit equal to 30.0 percent of the sum of the pollock
DFAs.
7 The Bogoslof District is closed by the final harvest specifications to directed fishing for pollock. The amounts specified are for ICA only, and
are not apportioned by season or sector.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Allocation of the Atka Mackerel ITAC
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(8)(i), up to 2
percent of the Eastern Aleutian District
and the Bering Sea subarea Atka
mackerel ITAC may be allocated to jig
gear. The amount of this allocation is
determined annually by the Council
based on several criteria, including the
anticipated harvest capacity of the jig
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
gear fleet. The Council recommended,
and NMFS approved, a 1 percent
allocation of the Atka mackerel ITAC in
the Eastern Aleutian District and the
Bering Sea subarea to the jig gear in
2007 and 2008. Based on the 2007 ITAC
of 22,015 mt, the jig gear allocation
would be 220 mt for 2007. Based on the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2008 ITAC of 15,717 mt, the jig gear
allocation would be 157 mt for 2008.
Section § 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A)
apportions the Atka mackerel ITAC into
two equal seasonal allowances. After
subtraction of the jig gear allocation, the
first seasonal allowance is made
available for directed fishing from
January 1 (January 20 for trawl gear) to
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9457
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
April 15 (A season), and the second
seasonal allowance is made available
from September 1 to November 1 (B
season; Table 4).
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C)(1), the
Regional Administrator will establish a
harvest limit area (HLA) limit of no
more than 60 percent of the seasonal
TAC for the Western and Central
Aleutian Districts. A lottery system is
used for the HLA Atka mackerel
directed fisheries to reduce the amount
of daily catch in the HLA by about half
and to disperse the fishery over two
districts (see § 679.20(a)(8)(iii)).
TABLE 4.—2007 AND 2008 SEASONAL AND SPATIAL ALLOWANCES, GEAR SHARES, AND CDQ RESERVE OF THE BSAI
ATKA MACKEREL TAC1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2007 Seasonal allowances 3
2007
TAC
Subarea and component
2007 CDQ
reserve 2
2007 CDQ
reserve
HLA limit 5
2007
ITAC
A season 4
B season 4
HLA
limit 5
Total
Total
HLA
limit 5
Western AI District ...................................
Central AI District .....................................
EAI/BS subarea 6 .....................................
Jig (1%) 7 ..........................................
Other gear (99%) ..............................
9,600
29,600
23,800
n/a
n/a
720
2,220
1,785
n/a
n/a
432
1,332
n/a
n/a
n/a
8,880
27,380
22,015
220
21,795
4,440
13,690
n/a
n/a
10,897
2,664
8,214
n/a
n/a
n/a
4,440
13,690
n/a
n/a
10,897
2,664
8,214
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total ...........................................
63,000
n/a
n/a
n/a
29,027
n/a
29,027
n/a
2008 Seasonal allowances 3
2008
TAC
Subarea and component
2008 CDQ
reserve 2
2008 CDQ
reserve
HLA limit 5
2008
ITAC
A season 4
B season 4
HLA
limit 5
Total
Total
HLA
limit 5
Western AI District ...................................
Central AI District .....................................
EAI/BS subarea 6 .....................................
Jig (1%) 7 ..........................................
Other gear (99%) ..............................
15,300
22,000
17,600
n/a
n/a
1,637
2,354
1,883
n/a
n/a
982
1,412
n/a
n/a
n/a
13,663
19,646
15,717
157
15,560
6,831
9,823
n/a
n/a
7,780
4,099
5,894
n/a
n/a
n/a
6,831
9,823
n/a
n/a
7,780
4,099
5,894
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total ...........................................
54,900
n/a
n/a
n/a
24,434
n/a
24,434
n/a
1 Regulations
at §§ 679.20(a)(8)(ii) and 679.22(a) establish temporal and spatial limitations for the Atka mackerel fishery.
2 The CDQ reserve is 7.5 percent in 2007 and 10.7 percent in 2008 of the TAC for use by CDQ participants (see §§ 679.20(b)(1)(iii), 679.31,
and section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the MSA).
3 The seasonal allowances of Atka mackerel are 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season.
4 The A season is January 1 (January 20 for trawl gear) to April 15 and the B season is September 1 to November 1.
5 Harvest Limit Area (HLA) limit refers to the amount of each seasonal allowance that is available for fishing inside the HLA (see § 679.2). In
2007 and 2008, 60 percent of each seasonal allowance is available for fishing inside the HLA in the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
6 Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea.
7 Regulations at § 679.20 (a)(8)(i) require that up to 2 percent of the Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea ITAC be allocated to
jig gear. The amount of this allocation is 1 percent. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by season.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Allocation of the Pacific cod ITAC
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(7)(i)(A), 2
percent of the Pacific cod ITAC is
allocated to vessels using jig gear, 51
percent to vessels using hook-and-line
or pot gear, and 47 percent to vessels
using trawl gear. Section
679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) further allocates the
portion of the Pacific cod ITAC
allocated to trawl gear as 50 percent to
catcher vessels and 50 percent to
catcher/processors. Section
679.20(a)(7)(i)(C)(1) sets aside a portion
of the Pacific cod ITAC allocated to
hook-and-line or pot gear as an ICA of
Pacific cod in directed fisheries for
groundfish using these gear types. The
Regional Administrator specifies an ICA
of 500 mt for 2007 and 2008 based on
anticipated incidental catch in these
fisheries. The remainder of Pacific cod
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
ITAC is further allocated to vessels
using hook-and-line or pot gear as the
following DFAs: 80 percent to hookand-line catcher/processors, 0.3 percent
to hook-and-line catcher vessels, 3.3
percent to pot catcher/processors, 15
percent to pot catcher vessels, and 1.4
percent to catcher vessels under 60 ft
(18.3 m) length overall (LOA) using
hook-and-line or pot gear.
Due to concerns about the potential
impact of the Pacific cod fishery on
Steller sea lions and their critical
habitat, the Pacific cod ITAC is
apportioned into seasonal allowances to
disperse the Pacific cod fisheries over
the fishing year (see
§§ 679.20(a)(7)(iii)(A) and 679.23(e)(5)).
For pot and most hook-and-line gear,
the first seasonal allowance of 60
percent of the ITAC is made available
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for directed fishing from January 1 to
June 10, and the second seasonal
allowance of 40 percent of the ITAC is
made available from June 10 (September
1 for pot gear) to December 31. No
seasonal harvest constraints are
imposed for the Pacific cod fishery by
catcher vessels less than 60 ft (18.3 m)
LOA using hook-and-line or pot gear.
For trawl gear, the first season is January
20 to April 1 and is allocated 60 percent
of the ITAC. The second season, April
1 to June 10, and the third season, June
10 to November 1, are each allocated 20
percent of the ITAC. The trawl catcher
vessel allocation is further allocated as
70 percent in the first season, 10 percent
in the second season and 20 percent in
the third season. The trawl catcher/
processor allocation is allocated 50
percent in the first season, 30 percent in
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9458
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the second season, and 20 percent in the
third season. For jig gear, the first
season and third seasons are each
allocated 40 percent of the ITAC and the
second season is allocated 20 percent of
the ITAC. Table 5 lists the 2007 and
2008 allocations and seasonal
apportionments of the Pacific cod ITAC.
In accordance with § 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(D)
and (a)(7)(iii)(B), any unused portion of
a seasonal Pacific cod allowance will
become available at the beginning of the
next seasonal allowance.
TABLE 5.—2007 AND 2008 GEAR SHARES AND SEASONAL ALLOWANCES OF THE BSAI PACIFIC COD ITAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Gear sector
2008
share of
gear
sector
total
2008
subtotal
percentages for
gear
sectors
2008
share of
gear
sector
total
n/a
57,872
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
n/a
n/a
500
n/a ..........................
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
57,372
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
80
..............
0.3
..............
3.3
..............
15
..............
1.4
64,030
..............
240
..............
2,641
..............
12,006
..............
1,121
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Dec 31 ......
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Dec 31 ......
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Sept 1–Dec 31 .......
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Sept 1–Dec 31 .......
n/a ..........................
38,419
25,611
144
96
1,586
1,055
7,203
4,803
n/a
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
80
..............
0.3
..............
3.3
..............
15
..............
1.4
45,897
..............
172
..............
1,893
..............
8,606
..............
803
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Dec 31 ......
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Dec 31 ......
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Sept 1–Dec 31 .......
Jan 1–Jun 10 .........
Sept 1–Dec 31 .......
n/a ..........................
27,538
18,359
103
69
1,136
757
5,163
3,443
n/a
74,221
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
3,158
..............
..............
n/a
50
..............
..............
50
..............
..............
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
37,110
n/a
n/a
37,110
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .........
Apr 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........
Jan 20–Apr 1 .........
Apr 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........
Jan 1–Apr 30 .........
Apr 30–Aug 31 .......
Aug 31–Dec 31 ......
n/a
25,977
3,711
7,422
18,555
11,133
7,422
1,263
632
1,263
53,333
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
2,269
..............
..............
n/a
50
..............
..............
50
..............
..............
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
26,666
n/a
n/a
26,666
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .........
Apr 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........
Jan 20–Apr 1 .........
Apr 1–Jun 10 .........
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........
Jan 1–Apr 30 .........
Apr 30–Aug 31 .......
Aug 31–Dec 31 ......
n/a
18,666
2,667
5,333
13,333
8,000
5,333
908
453
908
157,916
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
113,474
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
2007
subtotal
percentages for
gear
sectors
2007
share of
gear
sector
total
51
80,537
n/a
n/a
n/a ..........................
n/a
n/a
n/a
500
n/a
80,037
n/a
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
..............
n/a
47
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
2
..............
..............
100
Percent
Total hook-and-line/
pot gear.
Hook-and-line/pot
ICA.
Hook-and-line/pot
sub-total.
Hook-and-line C/P ..
Hook-and-line CV ...
Pot C/P ...................
Pot CV ....................
CV < 60 ft LOA
using Hook-andline or Pot gear.
Total Trawl Gear ....
Trawl CV .........
Trawl CP .........
Jig ...........................
Total .........
2007 seasonal apportionment 1
2007
share of
gear
sector
total
Date
Amount
2008 seasonal apportionment 1
Date
Amount
1 For
most non-trawl gear the first season is allocated 60 percent of the ITAC and the second season is allocated 40 percent of the ITAC. For jig gear, the first season and third seasons are each allocated 40 percent of the ITAC and the second season is allocated 20 percent of the ITAC. No seasonal harvest constraints are imposed for the Pacific cod fishery by catcher vessels less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA using hook-and-line or pot gear. For trawl gear, the first season is allocated 60 percent of the ITAC and the second and third seasons are each allocated 20 percent of the ITAC. The trawl catcher vessels’ allocation is further allocated as 70 percent
in the first season, 10 percent in the second season and 20 percent in the third season. The trawl catcher/processors’ allocation is allocated 50 percent in the first
season, 30 percent in the second season and 20 percent in the third season. Any unused portion of a seasonal Pacific cod allowance will be reapportioned to the
next seasonal allowance.
Sablefish Gear Allocation
Sections 679.20(a)(4)(iii) and (iv)
require the allocation of sablefish TACs
for the Bering Sea and AI subareas
between trawl and hook-and-line or pot
gear. Gear allocations of the TACs for
the Bering Sea subarea are 50 percent
for trawl gear and 50 percent for hookand-line or pot gear and for the AI
subarea are 25 percent for trawl gear and
75 percent for hook-and-line or pot gear.
Section 679.20(b)(1)(iii)(B) requires
apportionment of 20 percent of the
hook-and-line and pot gear allocation of
sablefish to the CDQ reserve. The
Council recommended that only trawl
sablefish TAC be established biennially.
The harvest specifications for the hookand-line gear and pot gear sablefish
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) fisheries
will be limited to the 2007 fishing year
to ensure those fisheries are conducted
concurrent with the halibut IFQ fishery.
Concurrent sablefish and halibut IFQ
fisheries would reduce the potential for
discards of halibut and sablefish in
those fisheries. The sablefish IFQ
fisheries will remain closed at the
beginning of each fishing year until the
final specifications for the sablefish IFQ
fisheries are in effect. Table 6 lists the
2007 and 2008 gear allocations of the
sablefish TAC and CDQ reserve
amounts.
TABLE 6.—2007 AND 2008 GEAR SHARES AND CDQ RESERVE OF BSAI SABLEFISH TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Percent of
TAC
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Subarea and gear
2007 Share
of TAC
2007 ITAC
2007 CDQ
reserve
2008 Share
of TAC
2008 ITAC
2008 CDQ
reserve
Bering Sea:
Trawl 1 ...............................................
Hook-and-line/pot gear 2 ...................
50
50
1,490
1,490
1,266
1,192
112
298
1,485
n/a
1,263
n/a
111
n/a
Total ...........................................
100
2,980
2,458
410
1,485
1,263
111
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9459
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 6.—2007 AND 2008 GEAR SHARES AND CDQ RESERVE OF BSAI SABLEFISH TACS—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Percent of
TAC
Subarea and gear
2007 Share
of TAC
2007 ITAC
2007 CDQ
reserve
2008 Share
of TAC
2008 ITAC
2008 CDQ
reserve
Aleutian Islands:
Trawl 1 ...............................................
Hook-and-line/pot gear 2 ...................
25
75
702
2,108
597
1,686
52
422
700
n/a
596
n/a
52
n/a
Total ...........................................
100
2,810
2,283
474
2,800
596
52
1 Except for the sablefish hook-and-line or pot gear allocation, 15 percent of TAC is apportioned to the reserve. The ITAC is the remainder of
the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
2 For the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to vessels using hook-and-line or pot gear, 20 percent of the allocated TAC is reserved for use
by CDQ participants. The Council recommended that specifications for the hook-and-line gear sablefish IFQ fisheries be limited to 1 year.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Allocation of PSC Limits for Halibut,
Salmon, Crab, and Herring
Section 679.21(e) sets forth the BSAI
PSC limits. Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(v)
and (e)(2)(i), the BSAI halibut mortality
limits are 3,675 mt for trawl fisheries
and 900 mt for the non-trawl fisheries.
Section 679.21(e)(1)(i) allocates 7.5
percent of these halibut mortality limits
as the PSQ reserve for use by the
groundfish CDQ program. Section
679.21(e)(1)(vii) specifies 29,000 fish as
the 2007 and 2008 Chinook salmon PSC
limit for the Bering Sea subarea pollock
fishery. Section 679.21(e)(1)(i) allocates
7.5 percent, or 2,175 Chinook salmon, as
the PSQ reserve for the CDQ program
and allocates the remaining 26,825
Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ
fisheries. Section 679.21(e)(1)(ix)
specifies 700 fish as the 2007 and 2008
Chinook salmon PSC limit for the AI
subarea pollock fishery. Section
679.21(e)(1)(i) allocates 7.5 percent, or
53 Chinook salmon, as the AI subarea
PSQ for the CDQ program and allocates
the remaining 647 Chinook salmon to
the non-CDQ fisheries. Section
679.21(e)(1)(viii) specifies 42,000 fish as
the 2007 and 2008 non-Chinook salmon
PSC limit. Section 679.21(e)(1)(i)
allocates 7.5 percent, or 3,150 nonChinook salmon, as the PSQ for the
CDQ program and allocates the
remaining 38,850 non-Chinook salmon
to the non-CDQ fisheries.
PSC limits for crab and herring are
specified annually based on abundance
and spawning biomass. The red king
crab mature female abundance is
estimated from the 2006 survey data at
29.7 million red king crabs and the
effective spawning biomass is estimated
as 157 million pounds (71,215 mt).
Based on the criteria set out at
§ 679.21(e)(1)(ii), the 2007 and 2008 PSC
limit of red king crab in Zone 1 for trawl
gear is 197,000 animals. This limit
results from the mature female
abundance being above 8.4 million king
crab and the effective spawning biomass
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
estimate being greater than 55 million
pounds (24,948 mt).
Section 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B) establishes
criteria under which NMFS must
specify an annual red king crab bycatch
limit for the Red King Crab Savings
Subarea (RKCSS). The regulations limit
the RKCSS to up to 35 percent of the
trawl bycatch allowance specified for
the rock sole/flathead sole/‘‘other
flatfish’’ fishery category based on the
need to optimize the groundfish harvest
relative to red king crab bycatch. The
Council recommended, and NMFS
approves, a red king crab bycatch limit
equal to 35 percent of the trawl bycatch
allowance specified for the rock sole/
flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ fishery
category within the RKCSS.
Based on 2006 survey data, Tanner
crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) abundance is
estimated as 866 million animals. Given
the criteria set out at § 679.21(e)(1)(iii),
the 2007 and 2008 C. bairdi crab PSC
limit for trawl gear is 980,000 animals
in Zone 1 and 2,970,000 animals in
Zone 2. These limits result from the C.
bairdi crab abundance estimate of over
400 million animals.
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(iv), the PSC
limit for snow crab (C. opilio) is based
on total abundance as indicated by the
NMFS annual bottom trawl survey. The
C. opilio crab PSC limit is set at 0.1133
percent of the Bering Sea abundance
index. Based on the 2006 survey
estimate of 3.25 billion animals, the
calculated limit is 4,350,000 animals.
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(i), 7.5
percent of each PSC limit specified for
halibut and crab is allocated as a PSQ
reserve for use by the groundfish CDQ
program.
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(vi), the PSC
limit of Pacific herring caught while
conducting any trawl operation for BSAI
groundfish is 1 percent of the annual
eastern Bering Sea herring biomass. The
best estimate of 2007 and 2008 herring
biomass is 178,652 mt. This amount was
derived using 2006 survey data and an
age-structured biomass projection model
developed by the Alaska Department of
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fish and Game. Therefore, the herring
PSC limit for 2007 and 2008 is 1,787 mt.
Section § 679.21(e)(3) requires the
apportionment of each trawl PSC limit
into PSC bycatch allowances for seven
specified fishery categories. Section
679.21(e)(4)(ii) authorizes the
apportionment of the non-trawl halibut
PSC limit into PSC bycatch allowances
among five fishery categories. Table 7
lists the fishery bycatch allowances for
the trawl and non-trawl fisheries.
Section 679.21(e)(4)(ii) authorizes the
exemption of specified non-trawl
fisheries from the halibut PSC limit. As
in past years, NMFS, after consultation
with the Council, exempts pot gear, jig
gear, and the sablefish IFQ hook-andline gear fishery categories from halibut
bycatch restrictions because (1) The pot
gear fisheries have low halibut bycatch
mortality, (2) halibut mortality for the
jig gear fleet is assumed to be negligible,
and (3) the sablefish and halibut IFQ
fisheries have low halibut bycatch
mortality because the IFQ program
(subpart D of 50 CFR part 679) requires
legal-sized halibut to be retained by
vessels using hook-and-line gear if a
halibut IFQ permit holder or a hired
master is aboard and is holding unused
halibut IFQ. In 2006, total groundfish
catch for the pot gear fishery in the
BSAI was approximately 19,721 mt,
with an associated halibut bycatch
mortality of about 5 mt. The 2006 jig
gear fishery harvested about 84 mt of
groundfish. Most vessels in the jig gear
fleet are less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
and thus are exempt from observer
coverage requirements. As a result,
observer data are not available on
halibut bycatch in the jig gear fishery.
However, a negligible amount of halibut
bycatch mortality is assumed because of
the selective nature of jig gear and the
low mortality rate of halibut caught with
jig gear and released.
Section 679.21(e)(5) authorizes
NMFS, after consultation with the
Council, to establish seasonal
apportionments of PSC amounts in
order to maximize the ability of the fleet
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9460
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
to harvest the available groundfish TAC
and to minimize bycatch. The factors to
be considered are (1) Seasonal
distribution of prohibited species, (2)
seasonal distribution of target
groundfish species, (3) PSC bycatch
needs on a seasonal basis relevant to
prohibited species biomass, (4) expected
variations in bycatch rates throughout
the year, (5) expected start of fishing
effort, and (6) economic effects of
seasonal PSC apportionments on
industry sectors. The Council
recommended and NMFS approves the
seasonal PSC apportionments in Table 7
to maximize harvest among gear types,
fisheries, and seasons while minimizing
bycatch of PSC based on the above
criteria.
TABLE 7.—2007 AND 2008 PROHIBITED SPECIES BYCATCH ALLOWANCES FOR THE BSAI TRAWL AND NON-TRAWL
FISHERIES
Prohibited species and zone
Trawl Fisheries
Halibut mortality (mt)
BSAI
Herring (mt)
BSAI
Red King
Crab
(animals)
Zone 1 1
C. opilio
(animals)
COBLZ 1
C. bairdi (animals)
Zone 1 1
Zone 2 1
Yellowfin sole
January 20–April 1 ..............................
April 1–May 21 ....................................
May 21–July 1 .....................................
July 1–December 31 ...........................
Rock sole/other flat/flathead sole 2
January 20–April 1 ..............................
April 1–July 1 .......................................
July 1–December 31 ...........................
Turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish 3
Rockfish
July 1–December 31 ...........................
Pacific cod
Midwater trawl pollock
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other 4
Red King Crab Savings Subarea 5
(non-pelagic trawl) ...............................
936 ..................................
312 ..................................
195 ..................................
49 ....................................
380 ..................................
829 ..................................
498 ..................................
164 ..................................
167 ..................................
n/a ...................................
n/a ...................................
69 ....................................
1,334 ...............................
n/a ...................................
232 ..................................
n/a ...................................
n/a ...................................
153
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
27
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
10
27
1,364
194
n/a
n/a
33,843
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
121,413
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
26,563
n/a
406
n/a
42,495
3,098,288
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
643,800
n/a
n/a
n/a
40,238
n/a
40,237
120,712
n/a
80,475
n/a
n/a
340,844
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
365,320
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
183,112
n/a
17,224
n/a
n/a
1,788,459
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
596,154
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10,988
324,176
n/a
27,473
n/a
n/a
Total trawl PSC ............................
3,400 ...............................
1,787
182,225
4,023,750
906,500
2,747,250
Pacific cod—Total
January 1–June 10 ..............................
June 10–August 15 .............................
August 15–December 31 ....................
Other non-trawl—Total
May 1–December 31 ...........................
Groundfish pot and jig
Sablefish hook-and-line
775 ..................................
320 ..................................
0 ......................................
455 ..................................
58 ....................................
58 ....................................
exempt ............................
exempt ............................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Total non-trawl PSC .....................
833 ..................................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
...............................
342 ..................................
n/a
14,775
326,250
73,500
222,750
PSC grand total ............................
4,575 ...............................
1,787
197,000
4,350,000
980,000
2,970,000
Non-trawl Fisheries
PSQ
reserve 6
1 Refer
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), Greenland turbot, rock sole, yellowfin
sole and arrowtooth flounder.
3 Greenland turbot, arrowtooth flounder, and sablefish fishery category.
4 Pollock other than pelagic trawl pollock, Atka mackerel, and ‘‘other species’’ fishery category.
5 In December 2006, the Council recommended that red king crab bycatch for trawl fisheries within the RKCSS be limited to 35 percent of the
total allocation to the rock sole/flathead sole/’’other flatfish’’ fishery category (see § 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)).
6 With the exception of herring, 7.5 percent of each PSC limit is allocated to the CDQ program as PSQ reserve. The PSQ reserve is not allocated by fishery, gear or season.
2 ‘‘Other
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Halibut Discard Mortality Rates
To monitor halibut bycatch mortality
allowances and apportionments, the
Regional Administrator uses observed
halibut bycatch rates, discard mortality
rates (DMR), and estimates of
groundfish catch to project when a
fishery’s halibut bycatch mortality
allowance or seasonal apportionment is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
reached. The DMRs are based on the
best information available, including
information contained in the annual
SAFE report.
The Council recommended, and
NMFS approves, the halibut DMRs
developed and recommended by staff of
the International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) for the 2007 and
2008 BSAI groundfish fisheries. These
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DMRs will be used for monitoring the
2007 and 2008 halibut bycatch
allowances (see Table 8). The IPHC
developed these DMRs using the 10-year
mean DMRs for the BSAI non-CDQ
groundfish fisheries. The IPHC will
analyze observer data annually and
recommend changes to the DMR where
a fishery DMR shows large variation
from the mean. The IPHC has been
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9461
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
calculating the DMRs for the CDQ
fisheries since 1998, and a 10-year mean
is not yet available. Until 10 years of
data from CDQ fishing has been
collected, recommendations will be
based on averaging all available data.
The justification for the DMRs is
discussed in Appendix A of the 2006
SAFE report dated November 2006 and
is available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES).
TABLE 8.—2007 AND 2008 ASSUMED PACIFIC HALIBUT DISCARD MORTALITY RATES FOR THE BSAI
Halibut mortality
(percent)
Gear
Fishery
Hook-and-line .......................................................
Greenland turbot .........................................................................................
Other species .............................................................................................
Pacific cod ..................................................................................................
Rockfish ......................................................................................................
Arrowtooth flounder ....................................................................................
Atka mackerel .............................................................................................
Flathead sole ..............................................................................................
Greenland turbot .........................................................................................
Non-pelagic pollock ....................................................................................
Pelagic pollock ............................................................................................
Other flatfish ...............................................................................................
Other species .............................................................................................
Pacific cod ..................................................................................................
Rockfish ......................................................................................................
Rock sole ....................................................................................................
Sablefish .....................................................................................................
Yellowfin sole ..............................................................................................
Other species .............................................................................................
Pacific cod ..................................................................................................
Atka mackerel .............................................................................................
Flathead sole ..............................................................................................
Non-pelagic pollock ....................................................................................
Pelagic pollock ............................................................................................
Rockfish ......................................................................................................
Yellowfin sole ..............................................................................................
Greenland turbot .........................................................................................
Pacific cod ..................................................................................................
Pacific cod ..................................................................................................
Sablefish .....................................................................................................
Trawl .....................................................................
Pot ........................................................................
CDQ trawl .............................................................
CDQ hook-and-line ...............................................
CDQ pot ...............................................................
Directed Fishing Closures
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i),
the Regional Administrator may
establish a DFA for a species or species
group, if the Regional Administrator
determines that any allocation or
apportionment of a target species or
‘‘other species’’ category has been or
will be reached. If the Regional
Administrator establishes a DFA, and
that allowance is or will be reached
before the end of the fishing year, NMFS
will prohibit directed fishing for that
species or species group in the specified
subarea or district (see
§ 697.20(d)(1)(iii)). Similarly, pursuant
to § 679.21(e), if the Regional
Administrator determines that a fishery
category’s bycatch allowance of halibut,
red king crab, C. bairdi crab or C. opilio
crab for a specified area has been
13
11
11
17
75
76
70
70
74
88
74
70
70
76
80
75
80
7
7
86
70
85
90
76
86
13
10
7
34
reached, the Regional Administrator
will prohibit directed fishing for each
species in that category in the specified
area.
The Regional Administrator has
determined that the remaining
allocation amounts in Table 9 will be
necessary as incidental catch to support
other anticipated groundfish fisheries
for the 2007 and 2008 fishing years.
TABLE 9.—2007 AND 2008 DIRECTED FISHING CLOSURES 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2007 Incidental catch
allowance
Area
Species
Bogoslof District ............................................................
Aleutian Islands subarea ..............................................
Pollock ..........................................................................
ICA Pollock ...................................................................
‘‘Other rockfish’’ ............................................................
Pacific ocean perch ......................................................
‘‘Other rockfish’’ ............................................................
ICA Pollock ...................................................................
Northern rockfish ..........................................................
Shortraker rockfish .......................................................
Rougheye rockfish ........................................................
‘‘Other species’’ ............................................................
Bering Sea subarea ......................................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands ..................................
1 Maximum
VerDate Aug<31>2005
retainable amounts may be found in Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679.
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
10
1,600
497
1,836
383
35,129
7,576
392
187
31,752
2008 Incidental catch
allowance
10
1,600
497
3,468
383
33,214
7,539
392
187
49,313
9462
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Consequently, in accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(i), the Regional
Administrator establishes the DFA for
the above species or species groups as
zero. Therefore, in accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), NMFS is prohibiting
directed fishing for these species in the
specified areas effective at 1200 hrs,
A.l.t., March 2, 2007, through 2400 hrs,
A.l.t., December 31, 2008.
In addition, the BSAI Zone 1 annual
red king crab allowance specified for the
trawl rockfish fishery (see
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv)(D)) is 0 mt and the
BSAI first seasonal halibut bycatch
allowance specified for the trawl
rockfish fishery is 0 mt. Also, the BSAI
annual halibut bycatch allowance
specified for the trawl Greenland turbot/
arrowtooth flounder/sablefish fishery
categories is 0 mt (see
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv)(C)). Therefore, in
accordance with § 679.21(e)(7)(ii) and
(v), NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for rockfish by vessels using
trawl gear in Zone 1 of the BSAI and
directed fishing for Greenland turbot/
arrowtooth flounder/sablefish by vessels
using trawl gear in the BSAI effective at
1200 hrs, A.l.t., March 2, 2007, through
2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2008.
NMFS also is prohibiting directed
fishing for rockfish outside Zone 1 in
the BSAI through 1200 hrs, A.l.t., July
1, 2007, for 2007 and July 1, 2008, for
2008.
Under authority of the 2006 and 2007
final harvest specifications (71 FR
10894, March 3, 2006), NMFS
prohibited directed fishing for Atka
mackerel in the Eastern Aleutian
District and the Bering Sea subarea of
the BSAI effective 1200 hrs, A.l.t.,
February 3, 2007, through 1200 hrs,
A.l.t., September 1, 2007 (72 FR 5644,
February 7, 2007). NMFS opened the
first directed fisheries in the HLA in
area 542 and area 543 effective 1200 hrs,
A.l.t., February 5, 2007. The first HLA
fishery in area 542 remained open
through 1200 hrs, A.l.t., February 19,
2007. The first HLA fishery in area 543
remained open through 1200 hrs, A.l.t.,
February 6, 2007. The second directed
fisheries in the HLA in area 542 and
area 543 opened effective 1200 hrs,
A.l.t., February 21, 2007. The second
HLA fishery in area 542 remained open
through 1200 hrs, A.l.t., March 7, 2007.
The second HLA fishery in area 543
remained open through 1200 hrs, A.l.t.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
February 22, 2007. NMFS prohibited
directed fishing for Pacific cod by
catcher vessels 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA and
longer using pot gear in the BSAI,
effective 12 hrs, A.l.t., January 26, 2007
through 1200 hrs, A.l.t., September 1,
2007 (72 FR 4217, January 30, 2007).
NMFS prohibited directed fishing for
non-CDQ pollock with trawl gear in the
Chinook Salmon Savings Areas of the
BSAI, effective 12 noon, A.l.t., February
6, 2007, through 12 noon, A.l.t., April
15, 2007, and from 12 noon, A.l.t.,
September 1, 2007, through 12
midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 2007 (72
FR 6178, February 9, 2007). NMFS
prohibited directed fishing for Pacific
cod by catcher processor vessels using
hook-and-line gear in the BSAI, effective
12 noon, A.l.t., February 12 2007, until
12 noon, A.l.t., August 15, 2007 (72 FR
7354, February 15, 2007). NMFS closed
directed fishing for the rock sole,
flathead sole, and ‘‘other flatfish’’
fishery category by vessels using trawl
gear in the BSAI effective 12 noon,
A.l.t., February 17, 2007 through 12
noon, A.l.t., April 1, 2007 (72 FR xxxx,
February 22, 2007). NMFS prohibiting
directed fishing for Pacific cod by
catcher processor vessels using pot gear
in the BSAI, effective 12 noon, A.l.t.,
February 20, 2007 through 1200 hrs,
A.l.t., September 1, 2007 (72 FR xxxx,
February 23, 2007). NMFS prohibited
directed fishing for Pacific cod by
catcher vessels 60 feet (18.3 meters (m))
LOA and longer using hook-and-line
gear in the BSAI, effective 12 noon,
A.l.t., February 21, 2007 (72 FR xxxx,
February 26, 2007).
These closures remain effective under
authority of these 2007 and 2008 final
harvest specifications. These closures
supersede the closures announced
under authority of the 2006 and 2007
final harvest specifications (71 FR
10894, March 3, 2006). While these
closures are in effect, the maximum
retainable amounts at § 679.20(e) and (f)
apply at any time during a fishing trip.
These closures to directed fishing are in
addition to closures and prohibitions
found in regulations at 50 CFR part 679.
Amendment 68 Sideboards
Section 802 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2004 (Public Law
108–199) grants NMFS specific statutory
authority to manage the Central Gulf of
Alaska rockfish fisheries. The Council
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adopted a Central Gulf of Alaska
Rockfish Pilot Program (Rockfish
Program) to meet the requirements of
Section 802 on June 6, 2005. The
Secretary approved Amendment 68 on
August 11, 2006. The elements of the
Rockfish Program are discussed in detail
in the proposed and final rules for
Amendment 68 to the FMP for
Groundfish of the GOA (71 FR 33040,
June 7, 2006 and 71 FR 67210,
November 20, 2006, respectively). The
final rule for Amendment 68 includes
prohibitions on catcher vessels fishing
specific groundfish fisheries in the BSAI
and limitations on fishing Pacific cod in
the BSAI during July. The basis for the
fishing prohibitions and the BSAI
catcher vessel Pacific cod sideboard
limit is described in detail in the final
rule for Amendment 68 (71 FR 67210,
November 20, 2006). Section
679.82(d)(6)(i) establishes the BSAI
catcher vessel Pacific cod sideboard
limit as 0.0 mt. Therefore, in accordance
with § 679.82(d)(7)(ii), NMFS is
prohibiting directed fishing for BSAI
Pacific cod in July for catcher vessels
under the Rockfish Program sideboard
limitations.
Listed AFA Catcher/Processor
Sideboard Limits
According to § 679.64(a), the Regional
Administrator will restrict the ability of
listed AFA catcher/processors to engage
in directed fishing for groundfish
species other than pollock to protect
participants in other groundfish
fisheries from adverse effects resulting
from the AFA and from fishery
cooperatives in the directed pollock
fishery. The basis for these sideboard
limits is described in detail in the final
rule implementing major provisions of
the AFA (67 FR 79692, December 30,
2002). Table 10 lists the 2007 and 2008
catcher/processor sideboard limits.
All groundfish other than pollock that
are harvested by listed AFA catcher/
processors, whether as targeted catch or
incidental catch, will be deducted from
the sideboard limits in Table 10.
However, groundfish other than pollock
that are delivered to listed catcher/
processors by catcher vessels will not be
deducted from the 2007 and 2008
sideboard limits for the listed catcher/
processors.
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
9463
TABLE 10.—2007 AND 2008 LISTED BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER/PROCESSOR GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
1995–1997
Target species
Pacific cod trawl ....
Sablefish trawl .......
Atka mackerel .......
Yellowfin sole ........
Rock sole ..............
Greenland turbot ...
Arrowtooth flounder
Flathead sole ........
Alaska plaice .........
Other flatfish ..........
Pacific ocean perch
Northern rockfish ...
Shortraker rockfish
Rougheye rockfish
Other rockfish ........
Squid .....................
Other species ........
Area
Retained
catch
BSAI .....................
BS .........................
AI ..........................
Central AI .............
A season1 .............
HLA limit 2 .............
B season1 .............
HLA limit 2 .............
Western AI ............
A season1 .............
HLA limit 2 .............
B season1 .............
HLA limit 2 .............
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BS .........................
AI ..........................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BS .........................
Eastern AI .............
Central AI .............
Western AI ............
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BS .........................
AI ..........................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
Total catch
12,424
8
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
100,192
6,317
121
23
76
1,925
14
3,058
12
125
3
54
91
50
50
18
22
73
553
48,177
497
145
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
435,788
169,362
17,305
4,987
33,987
52,755
9,438
52,298
4,879
6,179
5,698
13,598
13,040
2,811
2,811
621
806
3,328
68,672
Ratio of
retained
catch to
total catch
0.258
0.016
0.000
n/a
0.115
n/a
0.115
n/a
n/a
0.200
n/a
0.200
n/a
0.230
0.037
0.007
0.005
0.002
0.036
0.001
0.058
0.002
0.020
0.001
0.004
0.007
0.018
0.018
0.029
0.027
0.022
0.008
2007 ITAC
available to
trawl C/Ps
2007 C/P
sideboard
limit
37,110
1,266
597
n/a
13,690
8,214
13,690
8,214
n/a
4,440
2,664
4,440
2,664
115,600
46,750
1,428
646
17,000
25,500
21,250
8,500
1,836
4,598
4,672
7,141
7,576
392
187
383
497
1,675
31,752
9,574
20
0
n/a
1,574
945
1,574
945
n/a
888
533
888
533
26,588
1,730
10
3
34
918
21
493
4
92
5
29
53
7
3
11
13
37
254
2008 ITAC
available to
trawl C/Ps
26,666
1,263
596
n/a
9,823
5,894
9,823
5,894
n/a
6,831
4,099
6,831
4,099
127,500
63,750
1,462
655
25,500
38,250
51,000
18,190
3,468
4,376
4,465
6,805
7,539
392
187
383
497
1,675
49,313
2008 C/P
sideboard
limit
6,880
20
0
n/a
1,130
678
1,130
678
n/a
1,366
820
1,366
820
29,325
2,359
10
3
51
1,377
51
1,055
7
88
4
27
53
7
3
11
13
37
395
1 The seasonal apportionment of Atka mackerel in the open access fishery is 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season. Listed AFA catcher/processors are limited to harvesting no more than zero in the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea, 20 percent of
the annual ITAC specified for the Western Aleutian District, and 11.5 percent of the annual ITAC specified for the Central Aleutian District.
2 Harvest Limit Area (HLA) limit refers to the amount of each seasonal allowance that is available for fishing inside the HLA (see § 679.2). In
2007 and 2008, 60 percent of each seasonal allowance is available for fishing inside the HLA in the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
Section 679.64(a)(5) establishes a
formula for PSC sideboard limits for
listed AFA catcher/processors. The
basis for these sideboard limits is
described in detail in the final rule
implementing major provisions of the
AFA (67 FR 79692, December 30, 2002).
PSC species listed in Table 11 that are
caught by listed AFA catcher/processors
participating in any groundfish fishery
other than pollock will accrue against
the 2007 and 2008 PSC sideboard limits
for the listed AFA catcher/processors.
Section 679.21(e)(3)(v) authorizes NMFS
to close directed fishing for groundfish
other than pollock for listed AFA
catcher/processors once a 2007 or 2008
PSC sideboard limit listed in Table 11
is reached.
Crab or halibut PSC caught by listed
AFA catcher/processors while fishing
for pollock will accrue against the
bycatch allowances annually specified
for either the midwater pollock or the
pollock/Atka mackerel/‘‘other species’’
fishery categories under regulations at
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
TABLE 11.—2007 AND 2008 BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT LISTED CATCHER/PROCESSOR PROHIBITED SPECIES
SIDEBOARD LIMITS 1
1995–1997
PSC species
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
PSC catch
Halibut mortality .......................................................................................
Red king crab ...........................................................................................
C. opilio 2 ..................................................................................................
C. bairdi ...................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
955
3,098
2,323,731
n/a
Sfmt 4700
Total PSC
Ratio of
PSC catch
to total PSC
11,325
473,750
15,139,178
n/a
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
0.084
0.007
0.153
n/a
02MRR1
2007 and
2008 PSC
available
to trawl
vessels
3,400
182,225
4,023,750
n/a
2007 and
2008 C/P
sideboard
limit
286
1,276
615,634
n/a
9464
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 11.—2007 AND 2008 BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT LISTED CATCHER/PROCESSOR PROHIBITED SPECIES
SIDEBOARD LIMITS 1—Continued
1995–1997
PSC species
PSC catch
Zone 1 2 ....................................................................................................
Zone 2 2 ....................................................................................................
385,978
406,860
Total PSC
Ratio of
PSC catch
to total PSC
2,750,000
8,100,000
0.140
0.050
2007 and
2008 PSC
available
to trawl
vessels
906,500
2,747,250
2007 and
2008 C/P
sideboard
limit
126,910
137,363
1 Halibut
2 Refer
amounts are in metric tons of halibut mortality. Crab amounts are in numbers of animals.
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
AFA Catcher Vessel Sideboard Limits
Pursuant to § 679.64(a), the Regional
Administrator restricts the ability of
AFA catcher vessels to engage in
directed fishing for groundfish species
other than pollock to protect
participants in other groundfish
fisheries from adverse effects resulting
from the AFA and from fishery
cooperatives in the directed pollock
fishery. Section 679.64(b) establishes a
formula for setting AFA catcher vessel
groundfish and PSC sideboard limits for
the BSAI. The basis for these sideboard
limits is described in detail in the final
rule implementing major provisions of
the AFA (67 FR 79692, December 30,
2002). Tables 12 and 13 list the 2007
and 2008 AFA catcher vessel sideboard
limits.
All harvests of groundfish sideboard
species made by non-exempt AFA
catcher vessels, whether as targeted
catch or incidental catch, will be
deducted from the sideboard limits
listed in Table 12.
TABLE 12.—2007 AND 2008 BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL SIDEBOARD LIMITS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Species
Fishery by area/season/processor/gear
Pacific cod ....................................
BSAI ..............................................
Jig gear .........................................
Hook-and-line CV .........................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ................................
Jun 10–Dec 31 .............................
Pot gear CV ..................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ................................
Sept 1–Dec 31 ..............................
CV < 60 feet LOA using hookand-line or pot gear.
Trawl gear CV ..............................
Jan 20–Apr 1 ................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...............................
BS trawl gear ................................
AI trawl gear .................................
Eastern AI/BS ...............................
Jig gear .........................................
Other gear ....................................
Jan 1–Apr 15 ................................
Sept 1–Nov 1 ................................
Central AI ......................................
Jan–Apr 15 ...................................
HLA limit .......................................
Sept 1–Nov 1 ................................
HLA limit .......................................
Western AI ....................................
Jan–Apr 15 ...................................
HLA limit .......................................
Sept 1–Nov 1 ................................
HLA limit .......................................
BSAI ..............................................
BSAI ..............................................
BS .................................................
AI ..................................................
BSAI ..............................................
BSAI ..............................................
BSAI ..............................................
BS .................................................
Eastern AI .....................................
Sablefish .......................................
Atka mackerel ...............................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Yellowfin sole ................................
Rock sole ......................................
Greenland Turbot .........................
Arrowtooth flounder ......................
Alaska plaice ................................
Other flatfish .................................
Pacific ocean perch ......................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV
catch to
1995–1997
TAC
2007 initial
TAC
2007
Catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
2008 initial
TAC
2008
Catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
n/a
0.0000
n/a
0.0006
0.0006
n/a
0.0006
0.0006
0.0006
n/a
3,158
n/a
144
96
n/a
7,203
4,803
1,121
n/a
0
n/a
0
0
n/a
4
3
1
n/a
2,269
n/a
103
69
n/a
5,163
3,443
803
n/a
0
n/a
0
0
n/a
3
2
0
n/a
0.8609
0.8609
0.8609
0.0906
0.0645
n/a
0.0031
n/a
0.0032
0.0032
n/a
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
n/a
0.0000
n/a
0.0000
n/a
0.0647
0.0341
0.0645
0.0205
0.0690
0.0441
0.0441
0.1000
0.0077
n/a
25,977
3,711
7,422
1,266
597
n/a
220
n/a
10,897
10,897
n/a
13,690
8,214
13,690
8,214
n/a
4,440
2,664
4,440
2,664
115,600
46,750
1,428
646
17,000
21,250
8,500
1,836
4,598
n/a
22,364
3,195
6,390
115
39
n/a
1
n/a
35
35
n/a
1
1
1
1
n/a
0
0
0
0
7,479
1,594
92
13
1,173
937
375
184
35
n/a
18,666
2,667
5,333
1,263
596
n/a
157
n/a
7,780
7,780
n/a
9,823
5,894
9,823
5,894
n/a
6,831
4,099
6,831
4,099
127,500
63,750
1,462
655
25,500
51,000
18,190
3,468
4,376
n/a
16,070
2,296
4,591
114
38
n/a
0
n/a
25
25
n/a
1
1
1
1
n/a
0
0
0
0
8,249
2,174
94
13
1,760
2,249
802
347
34
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
9465
TABLE 12.—2007 AND 2008 BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL SIDEBOARD LIMITS—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Fishery by area/season/processor/gear
Species
Northern rockfish ..........................
Shortraker rockfish .......................
Rougheye rockfish ........................
Other rockfish ...............................
Squid .............................................
Other species ...............................
Flathead Sole ...............................
Central AI ......................................
Western AI ....................................
BSAI ..............................................
BSAI ..............................................
BSAI ..............................................
BS .................................................
AI ..................................................
BSAI ..............................................
BSAI ..............................................
BS trawl gear ................................
Halibut and crab PSC listed in Table
13 that are caught by AFA catcher
vessels participating in any groundfish
fishery for groundfish other than
pollock will accrue against the 2007 and
2008 PSC sideboard limits for the AFA
catcher vessels. Sections 679.21(d)(8)
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV
catch to
1995–1997
TAC
0.0025
0.0000
0.0084
0.0037
0.0037
0.0048
0.0095
0.3827
0.0541
0.0505
2007
Catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
2007 initial
TAC
4,672
7,141
7,576
392
187
383
497
1,675
31,752
25,500
and (e)(3)(v) provide authority to close
directed fishing for groundfish other
than pollock for AFA catcher vessels
once a 2007 or 2008 PSC sideboard limit
listed in Table 13 is reached. The PSC
that is caught by AFA catcher vessels
while fishing for pollock in the BSAI
12
0
64
1
1
2
5
641
1,718
1,288
2008 initial
TAC
4,465
6,805
7,539
392
187
383
497
1,675
49,313
38,250
2008
Catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
11
0
63
1
1
2
5
641
2,668
1,932
will accrue against the bycatch
allowances annually specified for either
the midwater pollock or the pollock/
Atka mackerel/‘‘other species’’ fishery
categories under regulations at
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
TABLE 13.—2007 AND 2008 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS FOR THE BSAI 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
PSC species
Target fishery category 2
Halibut ...................................................................
Pacific cod trawl ...................................................
Pacific cod hook-and-line or pot ..........................
Yellowfin sole .......................................................
January 20–April 1 ...............................................
April 1–May 21 .....................................................
May 21–July 1 ......................................................
July 1–December 31 ............................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 5 .................
January 20–April 1 ...............................................
April 1–July 1 ........................................................
July 1–December 31 ............................................
Turbot/Arrowtooth/Sablefish .................................
Rockfish (July 1–December 31) ...........................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species ...................
Pacific cod ............................................................
Yellowfin sole .......................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 5 .................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species ...................
Pacific cod ............................................................
Yellowfin sole .......................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 5 .................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species ...................
Rockfish ................................................................
Turbot/Arrowtooth/Sablefish .................................
Pacific cod ............................................................
Yellowfin sole .......................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 5 .................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species ...................
Pacific cod ............................................................
Yellowfin sole .......................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 5 .................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species ...................
Red King Crab Zone 1 3 4 .....................................
C. opilio COBLZ 3 .................................................
C. bairdi Zone 1 3 ..................................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV retained catch
to total retained catch
C. bairdi Zone 2 3 ..................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
0.6183
0.0022
n/a
0.1144
0.1144
0.1144
0.1144
n/a
0.2841
0.2841
0.2841
0.2327
0.0245
0.0227
0.6183
0.1144
0.2841
0.0227
0.6183
0.1144
0.2841
0.0227
0.0245
0.2327
0.6183
0.1144
0.2841
0.0227
0.6183
0.1144
0.2841
0.0227
02MRR1
2007 and
2008 PSC
limit
1,334
775
n/a
312
195
49
380
n/a
498
164
167
0
69
232
26,563
33,843
121,413
406
120,712
3,098,288
643,800
120,712
40,237
40,238
183,112
340,844
365,320
17,224
324,176
1,788,459
596,154
27,473
2007 and
2008 AFA
catcher vessel PSC
sideboard
limit
825
2
n/a
36
22
6
43
n/a
141
47
47
0
2
5
16,424
3,872
34,493
9
74,636
354,444
182,904
2,740
986
9,363
113,218
38,993
103,787
391
200,438
204,600
169,367
624
9466
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 13.—2007 AND 2008 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS FOR THE BSAI 1—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV retained catch
to total retained catch
Target fishery category 2
PSC species
Rockfish ................................................................
0.0245
2007 and
2008 PSC
limit
10,988
2007 and
2008 AFA
catcher vessel PSC
sideboard
limit
269
1 Halibut
amounts are in metric tons of halibut mortality. Crab amounts are in numbers of animals.
fishery categories are defined in regulation at § 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
4 In December 2006, the Council recommended that red king crab bycatch for trawl fisheries within the RKCSS be limited to 35 percent of the
total allocation to the rock sole/flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ fishery category (see § 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)).
5 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), Greenland turbot, rock sole, yellowfin
sole, arrowtooth flounder.
2 Target
3 Refer
Sideboard Directed Fishing Closures
AFA Catcher/Processor and Catcher
Vessel Sideboard Closures
The Regional Administrator has
determined that many of the AFA
catcher/processor and catcher vessel
sideboard limits listed in Tables 14 and
15 are necessary as incidental catch to
support other anticipated groundfish
fisheries for the 2007 fishing year. In
accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(iv), the
Regional Administrator establishes the
sideboard limits listed in Tables 14 and
15 as DFAs. The Regional Administrator
finds that many of these DFAs will be
reached before the end of the year.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), NMFS is prohibiting
directed fishing by listed AFA catcher/
processors for the species in the
specified areas set out in Table 14 and
directed fishing by non-exempt AFA
catcher vessels for the species in the
specified areas set out in Table 15.
TABLE 14.—2007 AND 2008 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT LISTED CATCHER/PROCESSOR SIDEBOARD DIRECTED FISHING
CLOSURES 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2007
Sideboard
limit
Species
Area
Gear types
Sablefish trawl ...................................
BS .....................................................
AI ......................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BS .....................................................
AI ......................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BS .....................................................
Eastern AI .........................................
Central AI ..........................................
Western AI ........................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BS .....................................................
AI ......................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
Trawl .................................................
Trawl .................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
Rock sole ..........................................
Greenland turbot ...............................
Arrowtooth flounder ...........................
Pacific ocean perch ...........................
Northern rockfish ...............................
Shortraker rockfish ............................
Rougheye rockfish ............................
Other rockfish ....................................
Squid .................................................
‘‘Other species’’ .................................
1 Maximum
20
0
1,730
10
3
34
4
92
5
29
53
7
3
11
13
37
254
2008
Sideboard
limit
20
0
2,359
10
3
51
7
88
4
27
53
7
3
11
13
37
395
retainable amounts may be found in Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679.
TABLE 15.—2007 AND 2008 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL SIDEBOARD DIRECTED FISHING CLOSURES 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2007
Sideboard
limit
Area
Gear types
Pacific cod .........................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Species
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BS .....................................................
AI ......................................................
Eastern AI/BS ...................................
Eastern AI/BS ...................................
Central AI ..........................................
Western AI ........................................
hook-and-line ....................................
pot .....................................................
jig ......................................................
trawl ..................................................
trawl ..................................................
jig ......................................................
other ..................................................
all ......................................................
all ......................................................
Sablefish ............................................
Atka mackerel ...................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
0
8
0
115
39
1
70
2
0
2008
Sideboard
limit
0
5
0
114
38
0
50
2
0
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
9467
TABLE 15.—2007 AND 2008 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL SIDEBOARD DIRECTED FISHING CLOSURES 1—
Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Species
Area
Greenland turbot ...............................
BS .....................................................
AI ......................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BS .....................................................
Eastern AI .........................................
Central AI ..........................................
Western AI ........................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BS .....................................................
AI ......................................................
BSAI ..................................................
BSAI ..................................................
Arrowtooth flounder ...........................
Pacific ocean perch ...........................
Northern rockfish ...............................
Shortraker rockfish ............................
Rougheye rockfish ............................
Other rockfish ....................................
Squid .................................................
‘‘Other species’’ .................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
1 Maximum
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
all
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
92
13
1,173
184
35
12
0
64
1
1
2
5
641
1,718
2008
Sideboard
limit
94
13
1,760
347
34
11
0
63
1
1
2
5
641
2,668
retainable amounts may be found in Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679.
Response to Comments
NMFS received 4 letters of comment
(19 comments) in response to proposed
the 2007 and 2008 harvest
specifications. These comments are
summarized and responded to below.
Comment 1: All quotas should be cut
in half this year and cut by 10 percent
each year thereafter until we stop
starving the marine life that depends on
eating this fish too.
Response: The decisions on the
amount of harvest are based on the best
available science and socioeconomic
considerations. NMFS finds that the
ABCs and TACs are consistent with the
biological condition of the groundfish
stocks as described in the 2006 SAFE
report and approved by the Council.
Comment 2: The Council, SSC and
Advisory Panel recommended that the
Alaska Fisheries Science Center
convene a Pacific cod model workshop
to consider recommendations from an
industry sponsored review for changes
to the stock assessment model. We are
advised that preparations are underway
for such a workshop to be held during
the second quarter of 2007. We
appreciate this effort and look forward
to the results and to the next TACsetting process.
Response: NMFS supports an Alaska
Fisheries Science Center workshop in
2007 to evaluate the Pacific cod model.
Comment 3: NMFS should define
‘‘directed fishery’’ for purposes of CDQ
allocations as the target species list in
the Council’s December 2005 final
action on management of CDQ reserves.
Response: This comment was
submitted by the Western Alaska
Community Development Association,
which is the CDQ Program
administrative panel (‘‘CDQ Panel’’)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
2007
Sideboard
limit
Gear types
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
created under the MSA. The CDQ Panel
proposed an alternative interpretation of
the term ‘‘directed fishery’’ in section
305(i)(1) of the MSA. The interpretation
of this term determines which species or
species groups are allocated to the CDQ
Program in the annual harvest
specifications.
As described in the 2007 and 2008
proposed harvest specifications for the
BSAI, section 305(i)(1) of the MSA was
amended on July 11, 2006, by the Coast
Guard and Maritime Transportation Act
of 2006. Section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) of the
MSA now requires that ‘‘the annual
percentage of the total allowable catch,
guideline harvest level, or other annual
catch limit allocated to the program in
each directed fishery of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands shall be the
percentage approved by the Secretary,
or established by Federal law, as of
March 1, 2006, for the program.’’
Prior to this amendment, the MSA
stated that ‘‘a percentage of the total
allowable catch of any Bering Sea
fishery is allocated to the program.’’
Since 1998, NMFS has allocated to the
CDQ Program a percentage of each
groundfish TAC category, except squid.
Section 305(i)(1) was amended again
on January 12, 2007, by the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Reauthorization Act of
2006 (Public Law 109–479). This
legislation amended section
305(i)(1)(B)(ii)(I) of the MSA. This
section now requires that ‘‘the
allocation under the program for each
directed fishery of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands (other than a fishery for
halibut, sablefish, pollock, and crab)
shall be a total allocation (directed and
nontarget combined) of 10.7 percent
effective January 1, 2008.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
As a result of these two MSA
amendments, allocations of groundfish
species or species groups to the CDQ
Program in 2007 will be made under
section 305(i)(1)(B)(i). Starting on
January 1, 2008, allocations of
groundfish other than pollock or
sablefish will be made under section
305(i)(1)(B)(ii)(I). Allocations of pollock
and sablefish in 2008 and thereafter will
continue to be made under section
305(i)(1)(B)(i).
The MSA requires allocation to the
CDQ Program of a percentage of ‘‘each
directed fishery of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands.’’ However, Congress
did not define the term ‘‘directed
fishery’’ in section 305(i)(1) or in other
provisions of the MSA. NMFS proposed
that the term be interpreted to mean
each species or species group with a
TAC that was open for directed fishing
in the BSAI in 2006. While this
interpretation initially appeared
consistent with the language of section
305(i)(1), it did not take into
consideration whether the species or
species group open for directed fishing
was economically valuable or whether
participants in the BSAI groundfish
fishery actually conducted directed
fishing for the species or species group
during the open period.
The CDQ Panel submitted a comment
to NMFS that disagreed with this
interpretation and requested that NMFS
define ‘‘directed fishery’’ as the list of
target species the Council identified for
the CDQ Program in December 2005.
The CDQ Panel suggested that the term
‘‘directed fishery’’ means the same thing
as a target fishery and referenced the
analysis NMFS prepared for the
Council’s 2005 action as support for this
recommendation. In that analysis,
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
9468
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS wrote that target species are
those species of economic importance
that are caught as the primary focus of
a directed fishery.
After consideration of the CDQ
Panel’s comments, and upon reexamination of NMFS’s proposed
interpretation, the statutory language,
and the legislative history, NMFS has
determined that the term ‘‘directed
fishery’’ for purposes of section 305(i)(1)
of the MSA means a fishery for which
sufficient quota exists to open a directed
fishery for that species or species group,
and the species or species group is
economically valuable enough for vessel
operators to conduct directed fishing for
that species or species group. NMFS
determined that this interpretation of
the term ‘‘directed fishery’’ for purposes
of section 305(i)(1) is a more reasonable
interpretation because it is more
consistent with Congressional intent.
Legislative history for section
305(i)(1)(B)(i) indicates that Congress
did not intend ‘‘directed fishery’’ to
include minor species that are not
economically valuable or to include
species or species groups that lack
sufficient quota to open them to
directed fishing. NMFS notes that
because the definition of ‘‘directed
fishery’’ is based on legislative history
for section 305(i)(1), the definition is
only applicable for purposes of section
305(i)(1). While NMFS does not find
adequate support for the definition of
‘‘directed fishery’’ proposed by the CDQ
Panel, as explained in greater detail
below, the application of NMFS’s
revised definition of ‘‘directed fishery’’
results in the allocation of the same
species and species groups as was
recommended by the CDQ Panel with
only one exception for Bogoslof pollock.
Under NMFS’s definition of ‘‘directed
fishery,’’ most of the species and species
groups NMFS proposed to allocate to
the CDQ Program in 2007 and 2008 will
remain the same. NMFS proposed that
Bering Sea pollock, AI pollock, Pacific
cod, sablefish from the fixed gear
allocation, Atka mackerel, yellowfin
sole, rock sole, Bering Sea Greenland
turbot, arrowtooth flounder, flathead
sole, and AI Pacific ocean perch be
allocated to the CDQ Program in 2007
and 2008 and has determined that these
species continue to meet the definition
of ‘‘directed fishery’’ for purposes of
section 305(i)(1) of the MSA because
sufficient quota exists to open a directed
fishery for these species and the species
are economically valuable. The CDQ
groups reported directed fisheries for all
of these species in 2006. The Council
and the CDQ Panel also recommended
that these species be allocated to the
CDQ Program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Additionally, most of the species and
species groups NMFS proposed not to
allocate to the CDQ Program in 2007
and 2008 will remain the same. NMFS
proposed that Bering Sea Pacific ocean
perch, northern rockfish, shortraker
rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ‘‘other
rockfish,’’ squid, and ‘‘other species’’
not be allocated to the CDQ Program in
2007 and 2008 and has determined that
these species and species groups still do
not meet the definition of ‘‘directed
fishery’’ for purposes of section
305(i)(1). Sufficient quota does not exist
to open directed fisheries for any of
these species or species groups, except
squid. Although sufficient quota exists
to open squid to directed fishing, it is
not economically valuable enough for
the CDQ groups to target. The CDQ
groups did not report directed fishing
for squid in 2006, although they could
have done so. The Council and the CDQ
Panel also recommended that these
species and species groups not be
allocated to the CDQ Program.
Under NMFS’s proposed definition of
‘‘directed fishery,’’ AI Greenland turbot,
‘‘other flatfish,’’ and Alaska plaice
would have been allocated to the CDQ
Program in 2007 and 2008 because
directed fishing was open for these
species in the BSAI in 2006. However,
AI Greenland turbot, ‘‘other flatfish,’’
and Alaska plaice are not directed
fisheries of the BSAI for purposes of
section 305(i)(1) of the MSA under the
revised definition of ‘‘directed fishery.’’
Although sufficient quota exists to open
these quota categories to directed
fishing, these species are not
economically valuable enough for the
CDQ groups to target them. The CDQ
groups could have conducted directed
fisheries for all of these species in 2006,
but they did not report doing so. It is
reasonable to assume that the CDQ
groups did not conduct directed
fisheries for these species because they
are not economically valuable enough to
justify doing so. Therefore, these species
do not meet the second part of the
definition of ‘‘directed fishery’’ for
purposes of section 305(i)(1) and are not
allocated to the CDQ Program for 2007
and 2008. Both the Council and the
CDQ Panel recommended that these
species and species groups not be
allocated to the CDQ Program. If, at
some point in the future, these species
become economically valuable and
sufficient quota exists to support
directed fisheries, these species would
be allocated to the CDQ Program.
Under NMFS’s proposed definition of
‘‘directed fishery,’’ allocations of
Bogoslof pollock and the trawl
allocations of sablefish in the Bering Sea
subarea and the AI subarea would not
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
have been made to the CDQ Program in
2007 and 2008 because directed fishing
was not allowed for these quota
categories in 2006. Both the Council and
the CDQ Panel recommended that these
species be allocated to the CDQ
Program.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(ii) allows the
allocation of a portion of the Bogoslof
pollock TAC to the CDQ Program if
directed fishing for pollock is allowed
by regulation in this district. However,
directed fishing for pollock currently is
not allowed in the Bogoslof District. The
pollock TAC is set at a low level and all
of it is allocated as an ICA for both the
CDQ and non-CDQ sectors. NMFS has
determined that Bogoslof pollock does
not meet the first part of the definition
of a ‘‘directed fishery’’ for purposes of
section 305(i)(1) of the MSA because
insufficient TAC exists to support a
directed fishery. Therefore, NMFS will
not allocate Bogoslof pollock to the CDQ
Program for 2007 and 2008. In the
future, if sufficient TAC exists to allow
directed fishing for pollock in the
Bogoslof District, current regulations
would provide for a DFA of 10 percent
of this TAC to the CDQ Program.
The sablefish TACs in the Bering Sea
subarea and the AI subarea are first
allocated between hook-and-line or pot
gear (fixed gear) and trawl gear. After
those gear allocations are made, 20
percent of the fixed gear allocation and
7.5 percent of the trawl allocation is
allocated to the CDQ Program as two
separate sablefish CDQ reserves in each
subarea. Under current regulations, only
catch of sablefish with fixed gear may
accrue against the fixed gear sablefish
CDQ reserve. However, any gear type
may be used to harvest sablefish that
accrues against the sablefish CDQ
reserve that originated from the trawl
allocation of sablefish. In addition,
although directed fishing for sablefish
using trawl gear is prohibited for the
non-CDQ sectors, this prohibition was
not applied to the CDQ fisheries.
Instead, the CDQ groups are prohibited
from exceeding either of their sablefish
allocations and they must decide how to
allocate sablefish among gear types and
directed fisheries to stay within their
allocations. The indirect result of these
allocations is that NMFS has allowed
directed fishing for sablefish on the
sablefish CDQ reserve that originates
from the trawl allocation of sablefish.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that
both trawl allocations of sablefish to the
CDQ Program meet the definition of a
‘‘directed fishery’’ for purposes of
section 305(i)(1) of the MSA. Sufficient
quota exists to allow directed fishing for
sablefish and sablefish is an
economically valuable species that for
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
which directed fisheries are conducted
in both the CDQ and non-CDQ sectors.
Based on this finding, NMFS will
continue to allocate 7.5 percent of the
trawl allocation of sablefish to the CDQ
Program.
Comment 4: The proposed harvest
specifications and accompanying Alaska
Groundfish Harvest Specifications
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
do not represent a substantial
implementation of the Alaska
Groundfish Fisheries Final
Programmatic Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement
(PSEIS) policy statement, but rather a
transparent attempt to indemnify the
agency against the inadequacies of the
status quo harvest strategy. The
proposed harvest specifications lack the
perspective of the ecosystem-based
policy framework outlined in the PSEIS
because there are no explicit procedures
in the TAC-setting process to address
the impacts of single-species fishing
strategies on dependent and related
species and their habitats in an
ecosystem context. Therefore, the policy
framework outlined in the PSEIS has
not been implemented in the regulations
governing the operation of the
groundfish fisheries. Under the
proposed harvest specifications,
ecosystem concerns would remain at
best ancillary to the process of
allocating fish and maximizing shortterm economic benefits.
Response: The preferred harvest
strategy alternative described in the EIS
is derived from the policy adopted as
the preferred alternative in the PSEIS
(see ADDRESSES) and is one of the
actions necessary to implement that
policy statement. Ecosystem concerns
are integral to the EIS analysis. The
purpose of the EIS is to describe the
potential environmental impacts of the
alternative harvest strategies, including
an analysis of the potential impacts of
these alternatives on ecosystem
components and the ecosystem as a
whole.
In addition to the EIS analysis, all
available scientific information on the
ecosystem is analyzed and presented to
decision-makers and the public on an
annual basis during the harvest
specifications process. The annual
SAFE reports, which provide the
scientific information to support the
harvest specifications for each species,
include ecosystem considerations
sections that describe the role of each
target species in the ecosystem. The
SAFE report also contains a separate
‘‘Ecosystems Considerations’’ chapter.
Groundfish fisheries management,
including the harvest specification
process, takes account of ecosystem
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
requirements related to predation,
competition, and habitat to provide
protection for ecosystem components.
Under the harvest strategy, the
determination of annual harvest
specifications incorporates ecosystem
considerations, in the face of
uncertainty in the quantitative links
between species. The most significant
ecosystem considerations are (1) The
upper end of the OY range in the BSAI,
which imposes a constraint on total
biomass removal, and (2) OFLs that
prevent overfishing of each stock. A
species’ OFL is a harvest limit rather
than a target and ABCs are set below
OFLs. The tier system sets maximum
ABCs and managers can set actual ABCs
lower for ecosystem considerations.
TACs never exceed ABCs and are
frequently set at lower levels. TACs can
also be adjusted downward for
ecosystem considerations. Additionally,
managers have established harvest
control rules for pollock, Pacific cod,
and Atka mackerel that prohibit
directed fishing at low biomass levels,
to account for Steller sea lion prey
needs. TACs and actual catches are
often lower than ABCs to protect other
species, especially halibut, that may be
taken as bycatch. Managers frequently
restrict directed fishing for many
species before TACs are reached to
comply with PSC limits. Inseason
management closes directed fisheries
when TACs are reached, and restricts
fishing in other fisheries taking the
species as bycatch when OFLs are
approached.
As noted below in the response to
Comment 5, the groundfish management
framework includes many measures, in
addition to the harvest strategy, to
mitigate the ecosystem impacts of the
groundfish fisheries.
Comment 5: Existing management
measures may be construed as
consistent with an ecosystem-based
approach, but they do not address major
ecosystem impacts of the fisheries as
promulgated in the annual catch
specifications.
Response: Existing management
measures address major ecosystem
impacts of the fisheries, and the Council
and NMFS are engaged in an ongoing
effort to improve the ways this is done.
The existing regulatory framework
imposes many constraints on fishing
activity, including time, area, and gear
restrictions, in order to mitigate or
control ecosystem impacts created by
fishing activity. Regulations impose
maximum retainable amounts on the
volume of bycatch a vessel may deliver
or have onboard. Prohibited species
catch (PSC) regulations impose limits on
harvests of crab, salmon, herring, and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9469
halibut, and restrict fishing activity once
those limits are reached. Important
restrictions have been imposed on key
fisheries to limit competition for Steller
sea lion prey and to protect Steller sea
lion critical habitat. The Pribilof Islands
Habitat Conservation Area protects
ecosystem components in the vicinity of
those islands. The Council and NMFS
have adopted numerous measures to
limit bycatch and control the discards of
low value fish by-products. Seabirds
attracted to longlines are protected by
mandatory gear requirements, such as
streamers, meant to reduce incidental
takes. Essential fish habitat (EFH) and
Habitat Areas of Particular Concern
(HAPC) in the AI subarea are protected
by an extensive system of closed areas
(see response to Comment 15).
NMFS and the Council are continuing
to develop ecosystem management
measures for the groundfish fisheries.
The Council has created a committee to
inform them of ecosystem developments
and to assist in formulating positions
with respect to ecosystem-based
management. The Council has initiated
work on a fisheries ecosystem plan for
the AI subarea. The Council and the
State have created a staff-level
interagency AI Ecosystem Team to
support this effort. It has taken the lead
in the establishment of the interagency
Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum to
improve inter-agency coordination and
communication on marine ecosystem
issues. The SSC has begun to hold
annual ecosystem scientific meetings at
the February Council meetings. In
addition to exploring how to develop
ecosystem management efforts, the
Council and NMFS continue to take
account of ecosystem impacts of fishing
activity as available information allows.
For example, the Council has initiated
an analysis of potential Bering Sea
subarea habitat conservation measures,
an analysis to address the potential
impacts of shifts in fishing activity to
the north including into the Beaufort
Sea, and is currently consulting under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for
Steller sea lions, sperm and humpback
whales. Ecosystem protection is
supported by an extensive research
program by the Alaska Fisheries Science
Center (AFSC) into ecosystem
components and integrated ecosystem
functioning. Exempted fishing permits
(EFPs) are issued to investigate new
management approaches for the control
of salmon bycatch in the BSAI, and
research into salmon and halibut
excluder devices.
Additionally, the EIS considers other
actions taken to manage the fisheries,
including reasonable future fisheries
management actions, as these are
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
9470
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
relevant to the environmental
consequences of the harvest strategy
alternatives. The Council and NMFS
have processes consistent with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to
evaluate each action to regulate other
aspects of the fisheries. The overall
fishery management policy within
which the harvest strategies fall has
been evaluated in the PSEIS. Moreover,
NMFS and the Council evaluated each
management measure at the time it was
adopted in the relevant NEPA
document. Considering different
management measures in separate
actions allows for more careful analysis
of alternatives and the implications of
each, and is often less confusing to the
public. The Council and NMFS are
actively evaluating a wide range of new
management measures through these
processes and will continue to do so.
Comment 6: Levels of exploitation on
single stocks are set with no explicit
consideration of the impacts of
dependent, competing species in the
food web or other impacts on associated
species that flow from the exploitation
of a relative few commercially desirable
species. The single species F40% policy
ignores effects on the ecosystem and
simply assumes that individual target
species can be fished to the maximum
sustainable yield (MSY) without
significant consequences to other
species in the food web.
Response: The harvest strategy
incorporates a key principle of
ecosystem-based fisheries management
by preserving individual stocks and
preventing overfishing of those stocks.
This is important for protecting
ecosystem components that depend on
these individual stocks. The effects of
the groundfish fisheries and fishing
rates are analyzed in the EIS and the
annual SAFE reports.
The tier system in the FMP and the
harvest specifications process lead to
TACs associated with fishing rates that
are less than FMSY. FOFL is never greater
than FMSY, or an appropriate FMSY
proxy. Average multi-year fishery
harvest rates fall below FMSY because
the tier system treats FOFL as a limit
rather than a target. The fishing rates
associated with maximum permissible
ABC, actual ABC, and the TAC, all fall
below the FOFL, providing a margin
between the actual F and the FMSY.
Moreover, as discussed in response to
Comment 5, other management
measures often constrain actual catches
and fishing rates below the TACs or the
fishing rates associated with the TACs.
With current levels of information, we
cannot precisely specify the margin or
threshold between FOFL and actual
harvest rate that provides the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
appropriate level of protection for
various ecosystem properties. The AFSC
continues to develop and improve
scientific information in the Ecosystems
Considerations section of the SAFE
report. New information added in 2006
included the relationship with Bering
Sea subarea pelagic forage species, the
relationship between predation/
production and fishing/production, a
metric proposed to evaluate the
management implications of potential
exploitation of forage species, and a
metric proposed to evaluate the
‘‘footprint’’ of individual fisheries.
The AFSC also continues to develop
and improve several multispecies and
ecosystem models to predict the
possible effects of fishing and/or climate
on ecosystem processes. Ecosystem
modeling is extremely complex, and the
incorporation of ecosystem
considerations into the harvest
specifications process is an evolving
process. The AFSC is advancing this
process through the development of
multispecies fish stock assessment
models that include predation,
ecosystem mass-balance and simulation
models, and single-species stock
assessment models that include
predation. The AFSC briefed the
Groundfish Plan Teams on the results of
these analyses to help them in their
deliberations in the harvest
specifications process.
Comment 7: Selective removals of
species and large differences in catch
rates for managed stocks may be
responsible for significant and lasting
changes in the structure of groundfish
assemblages and food webs in the North
Pacific, as seen in other ecosystems.
Selective extraction of a relatively few
high-value species may provide a
competitive opportunity for ‘‘underutilized’’ species such as arrowtooth
flounder, which appear to have
increased dramatically since the 1970s.
NMFS consistently attributes regional
stock declines and broader system
changes to the weather (‘‘regime
shifts’’), a transparent stratagem that
serves to justify the status quo and
absolve the agency of responsibility for
fishery-related systemic changes.
Response: NMFS analyzes and
considers the interactions among fish
species in its evaluations of the impacts
of groundfish fishing. The nature of
competitive interactions among species
is an area of ongoing research by the
AFSC. These issues are discussed in the
ecosystem sections of individual species
SAFE reports and by the Plan Teams as
they formulate their ABC
recommendations.
Species interactions are complex and
imperfectly understood in the North
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Pacific. The AFSC is collaborating to
develop a detailed, age-structured,
multispecies statistical model to study
this complex interaction of pollock and
arrowtooth flounder. This ‘‘cultivation/
depensation’’ model is expected to be
completed in the near future. In
December 2006, the BSAI Groundfish
Plan Team leader briefed the Council
and its SSC and AP on the complex
interactions between pollock and
arrowtooth flounder and on the
potential application of this model
whereby a species such as pollock
‘‘cultivates’’ its young by preying on
species that would eat its young.
Regime shifts remain an important
consideration. Regime shifts are well
documented; these changes in climate
are believed to have affected relative
abundance of species in the past, and
are expected to do so in the future.
Comment 8: NMFS fails to analyze the
cumulative and synergistic effects of
selective exploitation, benthic habitat
modification, and serial depletion of
targeted stocks in the North Pacific. The
‘‘Ecosystem Considerations’’ chapter in
the annual SAFE reports does not
consider the effects of large-scale
fisheries off Alaska on long-term
restructuring of food web dynamics and
on composition of species assemblages.
An evaluation of this phenomenon, and
consideration of alternatives to address
it, is also missing from the EIS and the
harvest specification process.
Additionally, the proposed harvest
specifications do not mitigate the effects
of selective exploitation and
disproportionate exploitation rates.
Response: NMFS takes a conservative
approach to management in response to
uncertainties. Conservative elements in
the harvest strategies and groundfish
fisheries management are listed in the
responses to Comments 4, 5, 15, and 16.
The EIS analyzed alternative harvest
strategies that met the scope of this
action, as determined by the statement
of purpose and need.
The EIS analyzes the effects of the
alternative harvest strategies on target
stocks and habitat in a comprehensive
way that looks at both the individual
species impacts and the overall
ecosystem function impacts. NMFS
agrees that uncertainty exists in
assessing the ecosystem effects of
alternative harvest strategies. One of the
functions of an EIS is to identify these
uncertainties. The EIS and the
Ecosystem Considerations chapter of the
SAFE reports examine trends in the
trophic level of catch and species
diversity. As noted in the response to
Comment 10, competitive interactions
between fisheries are an active area of
AFSC research, and are discussed, as
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
appropriate, in the ecosystem
discussions in the species-specific
sections of the SAFE reports.
Comment 9: Neither the EIS nor its
alternatives address the issues of setting
exploitation levels on single stocks with
no explicit consideration of the impacts
of dependent, competing species in the
food web or other impacts on associated
species that flow from the exploitation
of a relative few commercially desirable
species.
Response: The EIS directly examines
the impacts of the alternative harvest
strategies on non-target species,
including food web interactions. The
EIS examines the impacts of groundfish
fishing on forage fish availability in
Chapter 6, and the trophic level of
catches in Chapter 11. The EIS includes
detailed analyses of the impacts on prey
and habitat for key species and species
groupings of marine mammals and
seabirds in Chapters 8 and 9.
Comment 10: The uncertainties of
ecosystem mechanics underscore the
need for a much more precautionary
approach to fisheries management in the
context of food web and habitat
conservation, and illustrate why the
agency’s determinations of nonsignificance for fishery impacts on prey
availability and spatial/temporal
concentration of fisheries are arbitrary
and capricious. NMFS cannot
demonstrate that the current and
proposed levels of fishing permitted in
protected species’ habitats are ‘‘safe’’ or
‘‘insignificant.’’ Rather, NMFS assumes
that the impact is insignificant in the
absence of conclusive evidence to the
contrary. The burden of proof is on the
environment to show harm. This is
opposite of precautionary and the
opposite of an ecosystem-based
approach.
Response: NMFS did not make a
determination of non-significance in the
EIS. The EIS fully discloses known
impacts, areas of uncertainty, and
presents the information in comparative
form to aid in decision-making. NMFS
agrees that uncertainty exists in
assessing the ecosystem effects of
alternative harvest strategies. Identifying
these uncertainties is one of the
functions of an EIS. The EIS identifies
potential adverse impacts of the
alternatives on the ecosystem and the
uncertainty of those impacts. NMFS is
actively taking steps to reduce
uncertainty and better understand the
environment through ongoing scientific
research. Many elements built into the
harvest specifications process, and into
the groundfish fisheries management
regime, described in the responses to
Comments 4, 5, 15, and 16, contribute
to conservative management.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Comment 11: Major habitat impacts of
fishing on the EFH of FMP-managed
species and foraging habitats of ESA and
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA)-protected species are not
addressed in the EIS or mitigated in the
proposed harvest specifications.
Response: NMFS has examined in the
EIS the impacts of fishing on EFH of
FMP-managed species, and on the
foraging habitats of ESA- and MMPAprotected species. Chapter 8 examines
the impacts of alternative groundfish
harvest strategies on ESA- and MMPAlisted marine mammals. Chapter 9
provides a similar examination for ESAlisted seabirds. Chapter 10 examines the
impacts of the harvest strategies on EFH
and incorporates by reference the
analysis in the Essential Fish Habitat
Environmental Impact Statement (EFH
EIS, see ADDRESSES) that examines the
impact of fishing on benthic habitat.
Habitat impacts of fishing on the EFH
of FMP-managed species and foraging
habitats of ESA- and MMPA-protected
species are mitigated by the extensive
habitat protection measures enacted in
the BSAI. These are described in the
response to Comment 15.
Comment 12: The EIS fails to evaluate
the impacts of pelagic trawl gear on
habitat and the impact of the spatial
concentration of pollock and Pacific cod
catches on stock size, in a meaningful
fashion, and fails to consider an
alternative to address these impacts.
There is little scientific evidence that
fishing on spawning stocks of Alaskan
groundfish has had adverse impacts on
recruitment success. The status quo
practice of targeting groundfish on
spawning grounds, when the fish are
most vulnerable to fishing gear, is a
habitat impact of particular significance
that must be addressed. The dismal
abundance trends of several regional
pollock stocks and large uncertainties in
stock structure among many groundfish
populations cry out for explicit
protection of spawning grounds.
Response: The impacts of pelagic
trawling on habitat are evaluated in the
EFH EIS. Chapter 10 of the EIS provides
an EFH Assessment that incorporates by
reference the EFH EIS analysis of the
impacts of the groundfish fisheries on
EFH. Fisheries management measures,
other than harvest strategies, are outside
the scope of the action analyzed in the
EIS. Pollock and Pacific cod catches are
apportioned seasonally under existing
measures adopted to protect Steller sea
lions. Further seasonal apportionments
of catch would require regulatory
changes that were outside the scope of
this action, as defined by the purpose
and need.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9471
Comment 13: The MSA’s EFH
provisions should require the adoption
of marine reserves to protect vulnerable
reproductive habitats that are targeted
by the fisheries.
Response: This is not a comment on
the content of the groundfish harvest
specifications or on the accompanying
EIS, and deals with issues that are
beyond the scope of both.
Comment 14: The proposed harvest
specifications and accompanying EIS
fail to address major groundfish fishery
impacts on king crab EFH in the most
heavily trawled area of the Bering Sea,
the Unimak-Port Moller area.
Response: These impacts were fully
analyzed in the EFH EIS. The analysis
in the EFH EIS has been incorporated
into the EIS by reference to eliminate
repetitive discussion in Chapter 10.
Comment 15: NMFS’ assertions that
the status quo EFH measures provide
adequate protection or that the spatial/
temporal concentration of the fisheries
has insignificant impacts on EFH are not
supported by evidence. The EIS fails to
evaluate this information and consider
alternatives that would address these
impacts on fish habitat, and the
proposed harvest specifications provide
no adequate mitigation measures to
address these impacts. NMFS cannot
demonstrate that the current and
proposed levels of fishing permitted in
managed species’ habitats are
insignificant or compliant with the
spirit and letter of the MSA’s EFH
provisions. Rather, NMFS assumes that
the impact is insignificant in the
absence of conclusive evidence to the
contrary. The burden of proof is on the
environment and the managed species
to show harm. This is opposite of a
precautionary approach to EFH
conservation.
Response: In this EIS NMFS fully
discloses known impacts, identifies
uncertainties, and presents information
in comparative form to aid in decisionmaking. Detailed information of the
effects of fishing on EFH contained in
the 2005 EFH EIS was incorporated by
reference in this EIS. As discussed in
Chapter 2 of the EIS, fisheries
management measures, other than
harvest strategies, are outside the scope
of this action, as defined by the
statement of purpose and need.
The discussion of habitat impacts in
the EIS incorporated by reference the
science and analysis in the EFH EIS.
The analyses in Section 4.3 and
Appendix B of the EFH EIS indicated
that groundfish fishing has long-term
effects on benthic habitat features off
Alaska and acknowledged that
considerable scientific uncertainty
remains regarding the consequences of
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
9472
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
such habitat changes for the sustained
productivity of managed species.
Nevertheless, the EFH EIS concluded
that the effects on EFH are minimal
because the analysis found no
indication that continued fishing
activities at the current rate and
intensity would alter the capacity of
EFH to support healthy populations of
managed species over the long term.
Therefore, the EFH EIS determined that
new protection measures for the
fisheries to reduce the adverse effects on
EFH were not required. Nevertheless,
the Council recommended a suite of
new conservative measures to reduce
potential adverse effects to EFH and
HAPCs from fishing activities. These
actions continue the Council’s policy of
implementing conservative conservation
measures for the Alaska fisheries, as
described in the management policies
and objectives added to the groundfish
FMPs from the PSEIS policy statement.
NMFS implemented the Council’s
recommendations in 2006 (71 FR 36694;
June 28, 2006).
The Council and NMFS have taken a
conservative approach to habitat
protection by enacting substantial
restrictions on fishing that minimize
potential adverse effects on EFH. In the
Bering Sea subarea, bottom trawl
closures encompass about 30,000 square
nautical miles to reduce bycatch and
protect seafloor habitats. Measures to
protect Steller sea lions have fully or
partially closed about 58,000 square
nautical miles to fishing in the AI
subarea and GOA. More recently, the
Council and NMFS adopted a suite of
new measures to reduce the effects of
fishing on EFH in the AI subarea and
GOA, protecting nearly 300,000 square
nautical miles of habitat. The largest of
these areas, the Aleutian Islands Habitat
Conservation Area, prohibits bottom
trawling over 279,000 square nautical
miles to protect corals and other
sensitive habitat features. The Bowers
Ridge Habitat Conservation Zone north
of Adak is closed to all mobile bottomcontact gear. The Aleutian Islands Coral
Habitat Protection Areas are closed to
all bottom-contact fishing gear and
anchoring, protecting six especially
sensitive ‘‘coral gardens.’’ The Council
is presently undertaking an analysis of
additional habitat conservation
measures for the Bering Sea subarea,
which considers both area closures and
gear restrictions to further limit the
potential adverse effects of fishing on
EFH.
The Council and NMFS have taken
many other measures to protect habitat.
These include the trawl standards for
pelagic trawl gear in the BSAI to reduce
bottom contact, and a wide range of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
protection measures, including the
nearshore Bristol Bay trawl closure area,
the Red King crab savings area, the
Statistical area 516 seasonal closure,
and the Pribilof Islands Habitat
Conservation area. These actions reflect
a conservative management strategy.
Comment 16: The lack of spatialtemporal management of groundfish
stocks has potentially profound adverse
consequences for ESA-listed Steller sea
lions and MMPA-listed northern fur
seals. The apportionment of ABCs
according to broad management
subareas does not address the impacts of
fishing at local scales relevant to
foraging sea lions, fur seals, and other
species. NMFS fails to address localized
effects adequately in any alternative
considered in the EIS or the proposed
harvest specifications. NMFS cannot
demonstrate that the current and
proposed levels of fishing permitted in
protected marine mammal species’
habitats are insignificant. Existing
uncertainties underscore the need for a
highly precautionary approach to
habitat conservation, and illustrate why
the agency’s claims that spatial/
temporal concentration of the fisheries
under the status quo have insignificant
impacts on marine mammal foraging
habitats and prey are not supported by
evidence. As in other instances, the
burden of proof is on the environment
to show harm. This is opposite of a
precautionary approach.
Response: NMFS did not make a
determinations of non-significance in
the EIS. The EIS fully discloses known
impacts, areas of uncertainty, and
presents the information in comparative
form to aid in decision-making. The EIS
describes localized impacts of fishing
activity on marine mammals. Chapter 8
in the EIS evaluates the impacts of this
action on marine mammals, with
particular attention to impacts on Steller
sea lions and northern fur seals. The
chapter describes what is known about
the spatial and temporal overlap
between groundfish fishing activity and
marine mammal foraging habitat. The
EIS summarizes the available
information on the impacts of fishing
activity on marine mammals and their
habitat. While information on the
spatial and temporal impact of
groundfish fishing on other species is
relatively limited, the EIS provides a
review of the information available and
indicates where information is lacking.
Endangered Steller sea lions have
been protected by a suite of measures.
Groundfish fisheries conducted in
accordance with the Steller sea lion
protection measures adopted in 2002
have been determined not to jeopardize
Steller sea lions or adversely modify
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
their critical habitat. The protection
measures involve seasonal
apportionments of annual TACs, limits
on the proportion of catch within
habitat important for Steller sea lion
foraging, limits on fishing activity
within areas adjacent to haulouts and
rookeries, and closure of directed
fishing when biomass falls to low levels.
The protection measures and the
conclusions of no jeopardy or adverse
modification of habitat were arrived at
after careful evaluation in 2001. Since
that time, NMFS has continued to
investigate the determinants of Steller
sea lion declines. These measures are
currently being reevaluated in a new
biological opinion and revised recovery
plan.
Comment 17: The proposed harvest
specifications and the accompanying
EIS fail in substantive ways to comply
with the intent of the MSA, NEPA, the
ESA, and the MMPA.
Response: Prior to approval, the
Secretary ensures that this action and all
actions it takes are in compliance with
the MSA, NEPA, the ESA, and the
MMPA.
Comment 18: Given the current
uncertainties and lack of scientific
information, it is essential to adopt a
highly precautionary approach to
exploitation of these ecosystems, in
order to avoid the wholesale system
reorganization and impoverishment that
has been linked to fishing in other
marine ecosystems.
Response: The Council recommended
and NMFS approves the use of a
cautionary approach.
Comment 19: There is no ‘‘balance’’
between the interests of fisheries and
other public interests in the North
Pacific region: the scales are tilted
entirely to the advantage of the
industrial fisheries whose interests are
placed above all other public interests.
The tradeoffs between often contrary
FMP objectives are made by a decisionmaking body that is not representative
of the broader public interest and that
is biased heavily in favor of commercial
utilization of the public resource for its
own benefit. This state of affairs cries
out for basic reforms of the kind
outlined by the Pew Oceans
Commission (2003) and the U.S. Oceans
Policy Commission (2004) so that other
public interests and societal goals are
fairly represented, in order to achieve a
real ‘‘balance between competing uses’’
of the ocean commons.
Response: This is not a comment on
the content of the groundfish harvest
specifications or on the accompanying
EIS, and deals with issues that are
beyond the scope of both.
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Small Entity Compliance Guide
The following information is a plain
language guide to assist small entities in
complying with this final rule as
required by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This final rule’s primary
management measures are to announce
2007 and 2008 final harvest
specifications and prohibited species
bycatch allowances for the groundfish
fishery of the BSAI. This action is
necessary to establish harvest limits and
associated management measures for
groundfish during the 2007 and 2008
fishing years and to accomplish the
goals and objectives of the FMP. This
action affects all fishermen who
participate in the BSAI fishery. The
specific amounts of OFL, ABC, TAC,
and PSC amounts are provided in
tabular form to assist the reader. NMFS
will announce closures of directed
fishing in the Federal Register and in
information bulletins released by the
Alaska Region. Affected fishermen
should keep themselves informed of
such closures.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Classification
NMFS determined that the FMP is
necessary for the conservation and
management of the BSAI groundfish
fishery and that it is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
other applicable laws.
This action is authorized under
§ 679.20 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared a Draft EIS for this
action and made it available to the
public for comment (71 FR 53093,
September 8, 2006). NMFS prepared the
Final EIS and made it available to the
public on January 12, 2007 (72 FR
1512). On February 13, 2007, NMFS
issued the Record of Decision (ROD) for
the Final EIS. Copies of the Final EIS
and ROD for this action are available
from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
A Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) was prepared to
evaluate the impacts on small entities of
alternative harvest strategies for the
groundfish fisheries in the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) off of Alaska on
small entities. This FRFA meets the
statutory requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as
amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 601–612). A
summary of the FRFA follows.
The action under consideration is
adoption of a harvest strategy to govern
the harvest of groundfish in the BSAI.
The preferred alternative is the status
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
quo harvest strategy in which TACs fall
within the range of ABCs recommended
through the Council’s harvest
specification process and TACs
recommended by the Council. This
action is taken in accordance with the
FMP and adopted by the Council
pursuant to the MSA.
The proposed harvest specifications
were published in the Federal Register
on December 15, 2006 (71 FR 75460).
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for the
proposed harvest specifications and was
described in the classification section of
that preamble. Copies of the IRFA
prepared for this action are available
from NMFS, Alaska Region (see
ADDRESSES). The public comment
period ended on January 16, 2007. No
comments were received regarding the
economic impacts of this action.
The need for and objectives of this
rule are described in the preamble and
not repeated here.
Significant issues raised by public
comment are addressed in the preamble
and not repeated here.
The directly regulated small entities
include approximately 747 small
catcher vessels, less than 17 small
catcher-processors, and six Community
Development Quota (CDQ) Groups. The
entities directly regulated by this action
are those that harvest groundfish in the
EEZ of the BSAI, and in parallel
fisheries within State of Alaska waters.
These include entities operating catcher
vessels and catcher-processor vessels
within the action area, and entities
receiving direct allocations of
groundfish. Catcher vessels and catcher
processors were considered to be small
entities if they had annual gross
receipts, from all of their economic
activities, and including the revenue of
their affiliated operations, less than or
equal to $4 million per year. Data from
2005 was used because it was the most
recent available. CDQ groups receive
direct allocations of groundfish, and
these were considered to be small
entities because they are non-profit
entities. The Aleut Corporation is not a
small entity because it is a holding
company which does not meet the SBA
$6 million threshold for holding
companies (13 CFR 121.201).
Estimates of first wholesale gross
revenues for the BSAI non-CDQ and
CDQ sectors were used as indices of the
potential impacts of the alternative
harvest strategies on small entities.
Revenues were projected to decline
from 2006 levels in 2007 and 2008
under the preferred alternative due to
declines in ABCs for key species.
The preferred alternative (Alternative
2) was compared to four other
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9473
alternatives. These included Alternative
1, which would set TACs so as to
generate fishing rates equal to the
maximum permissible ABC (if the full
TAC were harvested), unless the sum of
TACs would exceed the regional OY, in
which case harvests would be limited to
the OY. Alternative 3 would set TACs
to produce fishing rates equal to the
most recent five year average of fishing
rates. Alternative 4 would set TACs to
equal the lower bound of the regional
OY range. Alternative 5 would set TACs
equal to zero.
Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 produced
smaller first wholesale revenues for
each of the three groupings, than
Alternative 2. Thus, Alternatives 3, 4
and 5 had greater adverse impacts on
small entities. Alternative 1 sets the
TACs equal to the maximum
permissible ABC unless the sum of
these TACs exceed the OY. In 2007 and
2008 the sum of the maximum
permissible ABCs exceeded the OY.
Therefore, the TACs under Alternative 1
were set equal to the OY. Also,
Alternative 2 TACs are constrained by
the ABCs the Plan Team and SSC
recommend to the Council on the basis
of a full consideration of biological
issues. These ABCs are often less than
Alternative 1 maximum permissible
ABCs. Therefore higher TACs under
Alternative 1 may not be consistent with
prudent biological management of the
resource. For these reasons, Alternative
2 is the preferred alternative. in the
BSAI (for both non-CDQ and CDQ
groups). For these reasons, Alternative 2
is the preferred alternative.
This action does not modify any
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), an agency
can waive the 30 day delay in
effectiveness of a rule for good cause.
These final harvest specifications were
developed as quickly as possible, Plan
Team review in November 2006,
Council consideration and
recommendations in December 2006,
and NOAA Fisheries review and
development in January–February 2007.
For all fisheries not currently closed
because the TACs established under the
2006 and 2007 final harvest
specifications (71 FR 10894, March 3,
2006) were reached, the likely
possibility exists for their closures prior
to the expiration of a 30-day delayed
effectiveness period because their TACs
could be reached. Certain fisheries, such
as those for pollock, Pacific cod, and
Atka mackerel are intensive fast-paced
fisheries. Other fisheries, such as those
for flatfish, rockfish and ‘‘other
species,’’ are critical as directed
fisheries and as incidental catch in other
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
9474
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
fisheries. U.S. fishing vessels have
demonstrated the capacity to catch the
TAC allocations in all these fisheries.
Any delay in allocating the final TAC in
these fisheries would cause disruption
to the industry and potential economic
harm through unnecessary discards.
Determining which fisheries may close
is impossible because these fisheries are
affected by several factors that cannot be
predicted in advance, including fishing
effort, weather, movement of fishery
stocks, and market price. Furthermore,
the closure of one fishery has a
cascading effect on other fisheries by
freeing-up fishing vessels, allowing
them to move from closed fisheries to
open ones, increasing the fishing
capacity in those open fisheries and
causing them to close at an accelerated
pace.
If the final harvest specifications are
not effective by March 10, 2007, which
is the start of the Pacific halibut season
as specified by the IPHC, the hook-and-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Mar 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
line sablefish fishery will not begin
concurrently with the Pacific halibut
season. This would cause sablefish that
is caught with Pacific halibut to be
needlessly discarded, as both hook-andline sablefish and Pacific halibut are
managed under the same IFQ program.
Immediate effectiveness of the 2007 and
2008 final harvest specifications will
allow the sablefish fishery to begin
concurrently with the Pacific halibut
season. Also, the immediate
effectiveness of this action is required to
provide consistent management and
conservation of fishery resources based
on the best available scientific
information, and to give the fishing
industry the earliest possible
opportunity to plan its fishing
operations. Therefore NMFS finds good
cause to waive the 30 day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Furthermore, the 2007 and 2008 final
harvest specifications implement the
groundfish sideboards and sideboard
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
closures that restrict the owners of
vessels with a history of participation in
the Rockfish Program from using the
increased flexibility provided by the
Rockfish Program to expand their level
of participation the catcher vessel
Pacific cod fishery in BSAI groundfish
fisheries. Until the 2007 and 2008 final
harvest specifications are effective no
sideboard restrictions or closures apply
to these vessels. Accordingly, NMFS
finds that there is good cause to waive
the 30 day delayed effectiveness period
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1540(f);
1801 et seq.;1851 note; and 3631 et seq.
Dated: February 22, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3692 Filed 3–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM
02MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9451-9474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3692]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 070213033-7033-01; I.D. 112706A]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands; 2007 and 2008 Final Harvest Specifications for
Groundfish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; closures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces 2007 and 2008 final harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch (PSC) allowances for the groundfish fishery of
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI). This action
is necessary to establish harvest limits for groundfish during the 2007
and 2008 fishing years and to accomplish the goals and objectives of
the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area (FMP). The intended effect of this
action is to conserve and manage the groundfish resources in the BSAI
in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA).
DATES: The 2007 and 2008 final harvest specifications and associated
apportionment of reserves are effective at 1200 hrs, Alaska local time
(A.l.t.), March 2, 2007, through 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final Alaska Groundfish Harvest Specifications
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Record of Decision (ROD), and
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) prepared for this action
are available from Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802, Attn: Ellen Sebastian, or from the Alaska Region Web site at
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov. Copies of the 2006 Stock Assessment and
Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for the groundfish resources of the
BSAI, dated November 2006, are available from the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council, West 4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99510-
2252, 907-271-2809, or from its Web site at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/
npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Furuness, 907-586-7228, or e-mail
mary.furuness@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal regulations at 50 CFR part 679
implement the FMP and govern the groundfish fisheries in the BSAI. The
North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared the FMP,
and NMFS approved it under the MSA. General regulations governing U.S.
fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS, after
consultation with the Council, to specify the total allowable catch
(TAC) for each target species and for the ``other species'' category,
the sum must be within the optimum yield (OY) range of 1.4 million to
2.0 million metric tons (mt) (see Sec. 679.20(a)(1)(i)). Also
specified are apportionments of TACs, and Community Development Quota
(CDQ) reserve amounts, PSC allowances, and prohibited species quota
(PSQ) reserve amounts. The final harvest specifications listed in
Tables 1 through 15 of this action satisfy these requirements. For 2007
and 2008, the sum of TACs for each year is 2 million mt.
Section 679.20(c)(3) further requires NMFS to consider public
comment on the proposed annual TACs and apportionments thereof and the
proposed PSC allowances, and to publish final harvest specifications in
the Federal Register. The 2007 and 2008 proposed harvest specifications
and PSC allowances for the groundfish fishery of the BSAI were
published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2006 (71 FR 75460).
Comments were invited and accepted through January 16, 2007. NMFS
received 4 letters with several comments on the proposed harvest
specifications. These comments are summarized and responded to in the
Response to Comments section of this rule. NMFS consulted with the
Council during the December 2006 Council meeting in Anchorage, AK.
After considering public comments, as well as biological and economic
data that were available at the Council's December meeting, NMFS is
implementing the 2007 and 2008 final harvest specifications as
recommended by the Council.
Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) and TAC Harvest Specifications
The final ABC levels are based on the best available biological and
socioeconomic information, including projected biomass trends,
information on assumed distribution of stock biomass, and revised
technical methods used to calculate stock biomass. In general, the
development of ABCs and overfishing levels (OFLs) involves
sophisticated statistical analyses of fish populations and is based on
a successive series of six levels, or tiers,
[[Page 9452]]
of reliable information available to fishery scientists. Tier 1
represents the highest level of data quality and tier 6 the lowest
level of data quality available.
In December 2006, the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC),
Advisory Panel (AP), and Council reviewed current biological
information about the condition of the BSAI groundfish stocks. The
Council's Plan Team compiled and presented this information in the 2006
SAFE report for the BSAI groundfish fisheries, dated November 2006. The
SAFE report contains a review of the latest scientific analyses and
estimates of each species' biomass and other biological parameters, as
well as summaries of the available information on the BSAI ecosystem
and the economic condition of groundfish fisheries off Alaska. The SAFE
report is available for public review (see ADDRESSES). From these data
and analyses, the Plan Team estimates an OFL and ABC for each species
or species category.
In December 2006 the SSC, AP, and Council reviewed the Plan Team's
recommendations. Except for Bering Sea subarea and Aleutian Islands
(AI) subarea pollock, yellowfin sole, rock sole, and the ``other
species'' category, the SSC, AP, and Council endorsed the Plan Team's
ABC recommendations. For 2007 and 2008, the SSC recommended higher
pollock OFLs and ABCs than the OFLs and ABCs recommended by the Plan
Team. For Bering Sea subarea pollock, the SSC recommended using a
procedure that sets the ABCs at the F40[percnt]
level which results in ABCs lower than the maximum permissible, but
higher than the Plan Teams recommendations. For AI subarea pollock, the
SSC recommended using tier 3 management which results in maximum
permissible ABCs and OFLs higher than the tier 5 management recommended
by the Plan Team. For yellowfin sole and rock sole, the SSC recommended
using tier 1 management which results in maximum permissible ABCs and
OFLs higher than the tier 3 management recommended by the Plan Team.
For ``other species,'' the SSC recommended using tier 6 management for
shark and octopus species resulting in lower ABCs than the Plan Team's
recommended tier 5 management. The SSC provided 2007 and 2008 ABC and
OFL amounts obtained as the sum of the individual species ABCs in the
``other species'' category since the current FMP specifies management
at the group level. For all species, the AP endorsed the ABCs
recommended by the SSC, and the Council adopted them.
The Plan Team, SSC, AP and Council recommended that total removals
of Pacific cod from the BSAI not exceed ABC recommendations. In 2006,
the Board of Fisheries for the State of Alaska (State) established a
guideline harvest level (GHL) west of 170 degrees west longitude in the
AI subarea equal to 3 percent of the Pacific cod ABC in the BSAI.
Accordingly, the Council recommended that the 2007 and 2008 TACs be
adjusted downward from the ABCs by amounts equal to the 2007 and 2008
GHLs.
The final TAC recommendations were based on the ABCs as adjusted
for other biological and socioeconomic considerations, including
maintaining the sum of the TACs within the required OY range of 1.4
million to 2.0 million mt. The Council adopted the AP's 2007 and 2008
TAC recommendations. None of the Council's recommended TACs for 2007 or
2008 exceeds the final 2007 or 2008 ABC for any species category. The
2007 and 2008 harvest specifications approved by the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) are unchanged from those recommended by the
Council and are consistent with the preferred harvest strategy
alternative in the EIS. The 2007 and 2008 TACs are less than the
maximum permissible ABCs recommended by the Council's plan teams and
SSC. NMFS finds that the recommended OFLs, ABCs, and TACs are
consistent with the biological condition of groundfish stocks as
described in the 2006 SAFE report that was approved by the Council.
Other Rules Affecting the 2007 and 2008 Harvest Specifications
The following paragraphs identify actions that are currently under
consideration by the Council and that, if submitted to and approved by
the Secretary, could change the 2007 and 2008 final harvest
specifications. The existing 2007 harvest specifications will be
updated in early 2007 when final harvest specifications for 2007 and
new harvest specifications for 2008 are implemented. The 2008 harvest
specifications will be updated in early 2008, when new harvest
specifications for 2008 and 2009 are implemented.
In April 2006, the Council adopted Amendment 85 to the FMP.
Amendment 85 would revise the BSAI Pacific cod sector allocations. If
approved by the Secretary, final regulations implementing Amendment 85
are anticipated to be effective for the 2008 fishing year. The notice
of availability of Amendment 85 to the FMP was published December 7,
2006 (71 FR 70943), and the comment period ended February 5, 2007. In
June 2006 the Council adopted Amendment 80 to the FMP. Amendment 80
would provide specific groundfish allocations to the non-American
Fisheries Act (AFA) trawl catcher/processor sector and allow the
formation of cooperatives. If approved by the Secretary, final
regulations implementing Amendment 80 also are anticipated to be
effective for the 2008 fishing year. The Council also adopted Amendment
84 that would modify current regulations for managing incidental catch
of Chinook and chum salmon and may change the PSC limits. The Council
also is considering two proposals. One would allocate the Pacific cod
TAC by Bering Sea subarea and AI subarea instead of a combined BSAI
TAC. The other would separate some species from the ``other rockfish''
or ``other species'' categories to establish individual OFLs, ABCs, and
TACs.
Changes From the 2007 and 2008 Proposed Harvest Specifications in the
BSAI
In October 2006 the Council's recommendations for the 2007 and 2008
proposed harvest specifications (71 FR 75460, December 15, 2006) were
based largely on information contained in the 2005 SAFE report for the
BSAI groundfish fisheries, dated November 2005. The Council recommended
that OFLs and ABCs for stocks in tiers 1 through 3 be based on biomass
projections as set forth in the 2005 SAFE report and estimates of
groundfish harvests through the 2006 fishing year. For stocks in tiers
4 through 6, for which biomass projections could not be made, the
Council recommended that OFLs and ABCs be unchanged from 2006 until the
2006 SAFE report could be completed. The 2006 SAFE report (dated
November 2006), which was not available when the Council made its
recommendations in October 2006, contains the best and most recent
scientific information on the condition of the groundfish stocks. In
December 2006, the Council considered the 2006 SAFE report in making
its recommendations for the 2007 and 2008 final harvest specifications.
Based on the 2006 SAFE report, the sum of the 2007 and 2008 recommended
final TACs for the BSAI (2,000,000 mt) is the same as the sum of the
2007 and 2008 proposed TACs. Compared to the 2007 and 2008 proposed
harvest specifications, the Council's 2006 final TAC recommendations
increase fishing opportunities for fishermen and economic benefits to
the nation for species for which the Council had sufficient information
to raise TAC levels. These species include BSAI flathead sole, Pacific
cod, sablefish,
[[Page 9453]]
yellowfin sole, ``other flatfish,'' Pacific ocean perch, northern
rockfish, ``other rockfish,'' and squid. Conversely, the Council
reduced TAC levels to provide greater protection for several species
including Bering Sea subarea pollock, rock sole, Greenland turbot,
shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, and ``other species.'' The
changes recommended by the Council were based on the best scientific
information available, consistent with National Standard 2 of the MSA,
and within a reasonable range of variation from the proposed TAC
recommendations so that the affected public was fairly apprised and
could make meaningful comments.
Comparison of Final 2007 and 2008 With Proposed 2007 and 2008 Total Allowable Catch in the BSAI
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 2007 final 2008 2008 final
Species Area 2007 final proposed minus 2008 final proposed minus
TAC TAC proposed TAC TAC proposed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock.................................... BS........................... 1,394,000 1,419,800 -25,800 1,318,000 1,168,700 149,300
AI........................... 19,000 19,000 0 19,000 19,000 0
Bogoslof..................... 10 10 0 10 10 0
Pacific cod................................ BSAI......................... 170,720 144,045 26,675 127,070 118,049 9,021
Sablefish.................................. BS........................... 2,980 2,580 400 2,970 2,240 730
AI........................... 2,810 2,620 190 2,800 2,260 540
Atka mackerel.............................. EAI/BS....................... 23,800 16,782 7,018 17,600 24,481 *-6,881
CAI.......................... 29,600 38,718 -9,118 22,000 27,728 -5,728
WAI.......................... 9,600 7,500 2,100 15,300 12,891 2,409
Yellowfin sole............................. BSAI......................... 136,000 117,100 18,900 150,000 106,400 43,600
Rock sole.................................. BSAI......................... 55,000 85,736 -30,736 75,000 111,600 -36,600
Greenland turbot........................... BS........................... 1,680 1,815 -135 1,720 1,815 -95
AI........................... 760 815 -55 770 815 -45
Arrowtooth flounder........................ BSAI......................... 20,000 20,000 0 30,000 144,800 -114,800
Flathead sole.............................. BSAI......................... 30,000 22,000 8,000 45,000 52,200 -7,200
Other flatfish............................. BSAI......................... 10,000 5,000 5,000 21,400 18,100 3,300
Alaska plaice.............................. BSAI......................... 25,000 32,000 -7,000 60,000 129,637 -69,637
Pacific ocean perch........................ BS........................... 2,160 3,020 -860 4,080 3,020 1,060
EAI.......................... 4,970 3,322 1,648 4,900 3,322 1,578
CAI.......................... 5,050 3,277 1,773 5,000 3,277 1,723
WAI.......................... 7,720 5,481 2,239 7,620 5,481 2,139
Northern rockfish.......................... BSAI......................... 8,190 5,000 3,190 8,150 5,000 3,150
Shortraker rockfish........................ BSAI......................... 424 580 -156 424 580 -156
Rougheye rockfish.......................... BSAI......................... 202 224 -22 202 224 -22
Other rockfish............................. BS........................... 414 810 -396 414 810 -396
AI........................... 585 590 -5 585 590 -5
Squid...................................... BSAI......................... 1,970 1,275 695 1,970 1,970 0
Other species.............................. BSAI......................... 37,355 40,900 -3,545 58,015 35,000 23,015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................. ............................. 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As mentioned in the 2007 and 2008 proposed harvest specifications,
NMFS is apportioning the amounts shown in Table 2 from the non-
specified reserve to increase the initial TAC (ITAC) of several target
species.
NMFS is revising the BSAI species that will be allocated to the CDQ
Program to include Bering Sea pollock, AI pollock, Pacific cod,
sablefish from both the fixed gear and trawl gear allocations, Atka
mackerel, yellowfin sole, rock sole, Bering Sea Greenland turbot,
arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole, and AI Pacific ocean perch. This
differs from the suite of species that NMFS proposed to allocate to the
CDQ Program, as described in the 2007 and 2008 proposed harvest
specifications (71 FR 75460, December 15, 2006). NMFS originally
proposed, in addition to the species listed above, allocating AI
Greenland turbot, ``other flatfish,'' and Alaska plaice to the CDQ
Program. NMFS also proposed to not allocate sablefish from the trawl
allocation to the CDQ Program.
Furthermore, NMFS is increasing the 2008 CDQ reserve allocations in
Table 1 to 10.7 percent from 7.5 percent, except for pollock and
sablefish. The statutory requirements and agency determination for
changing the suite of species and percentage allocations made to the
CDQ Program are described both in the 2007 and 2008 proposed harvest
specifications and in the response to Comment 3 in the Response to
Comments section of this action.
Catch in the CDQ fisheries of species in TAC categories that are
not allocated to the CDQ Program will be managed under the regulations
and fishery status that applies to the TAC category in the non-CDQ
groundfish fisheries. Retention of species closed to directed fishing
will either be limited to maximum retainable amounts or all catch of
the species will be required to be discarded. Notices of closures to
directed fishing and retention requirements for these species will
apply to the CDQ and non-CDQ sectors. The catch of these species in the
CDQ fisheries would not constrain the catch of other CDQ species unless
catch by all sectors approached an OFL.
The 2007 and 2008 final TAC recommendations for the BSAI are within
the OY range established for the BSAI and do not exceed ABCs for any
single species or complex. Table 1 lists the 2007 and 2008 final OFL,
ABC, TAC, ITAC, and CDQ reserve amounts of the BSAI groundfish. The
apportionment of TAC amounts among fisheries and seasons is discussed
below.
[[Page 9454]]
TABLE 1.--2007 and 2008 Overfishing Level (OFL), Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC), Total Allowable Catch (TAC), Initial TAC (ITAC), and CDQ Reserve Allocation of Groundfish in the BSAI \1\
[Amounts are in metric tons]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 2008
Species Area ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFL ABC TAC ITAC \2\ CDQ \3\ OFL ABC TAC ITAC \2\ CDQ \3\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock \4\.......................... BS\2\.................. 1,640,000 1,394,000 1,394,000 1,254,600 139,400 1,431,000 1,318,000 1,318,000 1,186,200 131,800
AI \2\................. 54,500 44,500 19,000 17,100 1,900 50,300 41,000 19,000 17,100 1,900
Bogoslof............... 48,000 5,220 10 10 0 48,000 5,220 10 10 0
Pacific cod \5\...................... BSAI................... 207,000 176,000 170,720 145,112 12,804 154,000 131,000 127,070 108,010 13,596
Sablefish \6\........................ BS..................... 3,520 2,980 2,980 2,458 410 3,290 2,970 2,970 1,263 111
AI..................... 3,320 2,810 2,810 2,284 474 3,100 2,800 2,800 596 52
Atka mackerel........................ BSAI................... 86,900 74,000 63,000 53,550 4,725 64,200 54,900 54,900 46,665 5,874
EAI/BS................. n/a 23,800 23,800 20,230 1,785 n/a 17,600 17,600 14,960 1,883
CAI.................... n/a 29,600 29,600 25,160 2,220 n/a 22,000 22,000 18,700 2,354
WAI.................... n/a 20,600 9,600 8,160 720 n/a 15,300 15,300 13,005 1,637
Yellowfin sole....................... BSAI................... 240,000 225,000 136,000 115,600 10,200 261,000 245,000 150,000 127,500 16,050
Rock sole............................ BSAI................... 200,000 198,000 55,000 46,750 4,125 271,000 268,000 75,000 63,750 8,025
Greenland turbot..................... BSAI................... 15,600 2,440 2,440 2,074 n/a 16,000 2,490 2,490 2,117 n/a
BS..................... n/a 1,680 1,680 1,428 126 n/a 1,720 1,720 1,462 184
AI..................... n/a 760 760 646 0 n/a 770 770 655 0
Arrowtooth flounder.................. BSAI................... 193,000 158,000 20,000 17,000 1,500 208,000 171,000 30,000 25,500 3,210
Flathead sole........................ BSAI................... 95,300 79,200 30,000 25,500 2,250 92,800 77,200 45,000 38,250 4,815
Other flatfish \7\................... BSAI................... 28,500 21,400 10,000 8,500 0 28,500 21,400 21,400 18,190 0
Alaska plaice........................ BSAI................... 241,000 190,000 25,000 21,250 0 252,000 199,000 60,000 51,000 0
Pacific ocean perch.................. BSAI................... 26,100 21,900 19,900 16,915 n/a 25,600 21,600 21,600 18,360 n/a
BS..................... n/a 4,160 2,160 1,836 0 n/a 4,080 4,080 3,468 0
EAI.................... n/a 4,970 4,970 4,225 373 n/a 4,900 4,900 4,165 524
CAI.................... n/a 5,050 5,050 4,293 379 n/a 5,000 5,000 4,250 535
WAI.................... n/a 7,720 7,720 6,562 579 n/a 7,620 7,620 6,477 815
Northern rockfish.................... BSAI................... 9,750 8,190 8,190 6,962 0 9,700 8,150 8,150 6,928 0
Shortraker rockfish.................. BSAI................... 564 424 424 360 0 564 424 424 360 0
Rougheye rockfish.................... BSAI................... 269 202 202 172 0 269 202 202 172 0
Other rockfish \8\................... BSAI................... 1,330 999 999 849 0 1,330 999 999 849 0
BS..................... n/a 414 414 352 0 n/a 414 414 352 0
AI..................... n/a 585 585 497 0 n/a 585 585 497 0
Squid................................ BSAI................... 2,620 1,970 1,970 1,675 0 2,620 1,970 1,970 1,675 0
Other species \9\.................... BSAI................... 91,700 68,800 37,355 31,752 0 91,700 68,800 58,015 49,313 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................ ....................... 3,188,973 2,676,035 2,000,000 1,770,474 179,245 3,014,973 2,642,125 2,000,000 1,763,808 187,491
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These amounts apply to the entire BSAI management area unless otherwise specified. With the exception of pollock, and for the purpose of these harvest specifications, the Bering Sea (BS)
subarea includes the Bogoslof District.
\2\ Except for pollock and the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line and pot gear, 15 percent of each TAC is put into a reserve. The ITAC for each species is the remainder of
the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
\3\ Except for Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot, ``other flatfish,'' Alaska plaice, Bering Sea Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ``other
rockfish,'' squid, and ``other species,'' 7.5 percent in 2007 and 10.7 percent in 2008 of the TAC is designated as a CDQ reserve for use by CDQ participants (see Sec. Sec.
679.20(b)(1)(iii), 679.31, and section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the MSA).
\4\ Under Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC after subtraction for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and the incidental catch allowance (2.8
percent), is further allocated by sector for a directed pollock fishery as follows: inshore--50 percent; catcher/processor--40 percent; and motherships--10 percent. Under Sec.
679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual Aleutian Islands subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the
incidental catch allowance (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery.
\5\ The Pacific cod TAC is reduced by 3 percent from the ABC to account for the State of Alaska's (State) guideline harvest level in State waters of the Aleutian Islands subarea.
\6\ Twenty percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line gear or pot gear is reserved for use by CDQ participants (see Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(iii)(B)).
\7\ ``Other flatfish'' includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock sole, yellowfin sole, arrowtooth flounder and Alaska
plaice.
\8\ ``Other rockfish'' includes all Sebastes and Sebastolobus species except for Pacific ocean perch, northern, shortraker, and rougheye rockfish.
\9\ ``Other species'' includes sculpins, sharks, skates and octopus. Forage fish, as defined at Sec. 679.2, are not included in the ``other species'' category.
[[Page 9455]]
Reserves and the Incidental Catch Allowance (ICA) for Pollock
Section 679.20(b)(1)(i) of the CFR requires the placement of 15
percent of the TAC for each target species or species group, except for
pollock and the hook-and-line and pot gear allocation of sablefish, in
a non-specified reserve. Section 679.20(b)(1)(iii)(A) of the CFR and
section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the MSA further require the
allocation of one-half of each TAC amount that is placed in the non-
specified reserve (7.5 percent of the TAC) in 2007 and 10.7 percent in
2008 be allocated to the groundfish CDQ reserve with the exception of
Bogoslof pollock, Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot, ``other
flatfish,'' Alaska plaice, Bering Sea Pacific ocean perch, northern
rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ``other rockfish,''
squid, and ``other species,'' as explained above. Section
679.20(b)(1)(iii)(B) requires 20 percent of the hook-and-line and pot
gear allocation of sablefish be allocated to the fixed gear sablefish
CDQ reserve. Sections 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i),
and 679.31(a) also require the allocation of 10 percent of the BSAI
pollock TACs to the pollock CDQ directed fishing allowance (DFA). The
entire Bogoslof District pollock TAC is allocated as an ICA (see Sec.
679.20(a)(5)(ii)). With the exception of the hook-and-line and pot gear
sablefish CDQ reserve, the regulations do not further apportion the CDQ
reserves by gear. Section 679.21(e)(1)(i) requires withholding of 7.5
percent of each PSC limit, with the exception of herring, as a PSQ
reserve for the CDQ fisheries. Sections 679.30 and 679.31 set forth
regulations governing the management of the CDQ and PSQ reserves.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), NMFS allocates a pollock
ICA of 2.8 percent of the Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC after
subtraction of the 10 percent CDQ reserve. This allowance is based on
NMFS' examination of the pollock incidental catch, including the
incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in target fisheries other than pollock
from 1999 through 2006. During this 8-year period, the pollock
incidental catch ranged from a low of 2.4 percent in 2006, to a high of
5 percent in 1999, with a 7-year average of 3.5 percent. Pursuant to
Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), NMFS recommends pollock ICA
of 1,600 mt for AI subarea pollock after subtraction of the 10 percent
CDQ DFA. This allowance is based on NMFS' examination of the pollock
incidental catch, including the incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in
target fisheries other than pollock from 2003 through 2006. During this
4-year period, the incidental catch of pollock ranged from a low of 5
percent in 2006 to a high of 10 percent in 2003, with a 4-year average
of 7 percent.
The regulations do not designate the remainder of the non-specified
reserve by species or species group. Any amount of the reserve may be
apportioned to a target species or to the ``other species'' category
during the year, providing that such apportionments do not result in
overfishing (see Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii)). The Regional Administrator
has determined that the ITACs specified for the species listed in Table
2 need to be supplemented from the non-specified reserve because U.S.
fishing vessels have demonstrated the capacity to catch the full TAC
allocations. Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 679.20(b)(3), NMFS is
apportioning the amounts shown in Table 2 from the non-specified
reserve to increase the ITAC by 7.5 percent of the TAC in 2007. In
2008, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, and
Bering Sea ``other rockfish'' are increased by 7.5 percent of TAC and
Atka mackerel, Pacific ocean perch, and Pacific cod by 4.3 percent of
the TAC.
Table 2.--2007 and 2008 Apportionment of Reserves to ITAC Categories
[Amounts are in metric tons]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 2008
Species--area or subarea Reserve 2007 Final Reserve 2008 Final
amount ITAC amount ITAC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atka mackerel--Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea 1,785 22,015 757 15,717
subarea....................................................
Atka mackerel--Central Aleutian District.................... 2,220 27,380 946 19,646
Atka mackerel--Western Aleutian District.................... 720 8,880 658 13,663
Pacific ocean perch--Eastern Aleutian District.............. 373 4,598 211 4,376
Pacific ocean perch--Central Aleutian District.............. 379 4,672 215 4,465
Pacific ocean perch--Western Aleutian District.............. 579 7,141 328 6,805
Pacific cod--BSAI........................................... 12,804 157,916 5,464 113,474
Shortraker rockfish--BSAI................................... 32 392 32 392
Rougheye rockfish--BSAI..................................... 15 187 15 187
Northern rockfish--BSAI..................................... 614 7,576 611 7,539
Other rockfish--Bering Sea subarea.......................... 31 383 31 383
---------------------------------------------------
Total................................................... 19,552 241,140 9,268 186,647
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocation of Pollock TAC Under the American Fisheries Act (AFA)
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) requires that the pollock TAC
apportioned to the Bering Sea subarea, after subtraction of the 10
percent for the CDQ program and the 2.8 percent for the ICA, be
allocated as a DFA as follows: 50 percent to the inshore sector, 40
percent to the catcher/processor sector, and 10 percent to the
mothership sector. In the Bering Sea subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the A season (January 20-June 10) and 60 percent of the
DFA is allocated to the B season (June 10-November 1). In October 2006,
the State's Board of Fisheries adopted a proposal for a 3,000 mt
pollock fishery in State waters of the AI subarea. However, this action
by the State does not require a downward adjustment of the Federal AI
subarea pollock TAC because the combined TAC and GHL (22,000 mt) are
less than the proposed ABC of 44,500 mt. The AI directed pollock
fishery allocation to the Aleut Corporation is the amount of pollock
remaining in the AI subarea after subtracting 1,900 mt for the CDQ DFA
(10 percent) and 1,600 mt for the ICA. In the AI subarea, 40 percent of
the ABC is allocated to the A season and the remainder of the directed
pollock fishery is allocated to the B season. Table 3 lists these 2007
and 2008 amounts.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4) also includes several specific
requirements
[[Page 9456]]
regarding pollock allocations. First, 8.5 percent of the pollock
allocated to the catcher/processor sector will be available for harvest
by AFA catcher vessels with catcher/processor sector endorsements,
unless the Regional Administrator receives a cooperative contract that
provides for the distribution of harvest among AFA catcher/processors
and AFA catcher vessels in a manner agreed to by all members. Second,
AFA catcher/processors not listed in the AFA are limited to harvesting
not more than 0.5 percent of the pollock allocated to the catcher/
processor sector. Table 3 lists the 2007 and 2008 allocations of
pollock TAC. Tables 10 through 15 list the AFA catcher/processor and
catcher vessel harvesting sideboard limits. The tables for the pollock
allocations to the Bering Sea subarea inshore pollock cooperatives and
open access sector will be posted on the Alaska Region Web site at
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Table 3 also lists seasonal apportionments of pollock and harvest
limits within the Steller Sea Lion Conservation Area (SCA). The harvest
within the SCA, as defined at Sec. 679.22(a)(7)(vii), is limited to 28
percent of the annual DFA until April 1. The remaining 12 percent of
the 40 percent of the annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken
outside the SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If less
than 28 percent of the annual DFA is taken inside the SCA before April
1, the remainder will be available to be taken inside the SCA after
April 1. The A season pollock SCA harvest limit will be apportioned to
each sector in proportion to each sector's allocated percentage of the
DFA. Table 3 lists by sector these 2007 and 2008 amounts.
Table 3.--2007 and 2008 Allocations of Pollock TACs to the Directed Pollock Fisheries and to the CDQ Directed Fishing Allowances (DFA) \1\
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 A season \1\ 2007 B 2008 A season \1\ 2008 B
------------------------ season \1\ ------------------------ season \1\
Area and sector 2007 SCA ------------ 2008 SCA -----------
Allocations A season harvest B season Allocations A season harvest B season
DFA limit \2\ DFA DFA limit \2\ DFA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bering Sea subarea.................................... 1,394,000 n/a n/a n/a 1,318,000 n/a n/a n/a
CDQ DFA............................................. 139,400 55,760 39,032 83,640 131,800 52,720 36,904 79,080
ICA \1\............................................. 35,129 n/a n/a n/a 33,214 n/a n/a n/a
AFA Inshore......................................... 609,736 243,894 170,726 365,841 576,493 230,597 161,418 345,896
AFA Catcher/Processors \3\.......................... 487,788 195,115 136,581 292,673 461,195 184,478 129,134 276,717
Catch by C/Ps..................................... 446,326 178,531 n/a 267,796 421,993 168,797 n/a 253,196
Catch by CVs \3\.................................. 41,462 16,585 n/a 24,877 39,202 15,681 n/a 23,521
Unlisted C/P Limit \4\.......................... 2,439 976 n/a 1,463 2,306 922 n/a 1,384
AFA Motherships....................................... 121,947 48,779 34,145 73,168 115,299 46,119 32,284 69,179
Excessive Harvesting Limit \5\........................ 213,407 n/a n/a n/a 201,773 n/a n/a n/a
Excessive Processing Limit \6\........................ 365,841 n/a n/a n/a 345,896 n/a n/a n/a
Total Bering Sea DFA.................................. 1,358,871 543,548 380,484 815,322 1,284,787 513,914 359,740 770,872
Aleutian Islands subarea \1\.......................... 19,000 n/a n/a n/a 19,000 n/a n/a n/a
CDQ DFA............................................. 1,900 760 n/a 1,140 1,900 760 n/a 1,140
ICA................................................. 1,600 800 n/a 800 1,600 800 n/a 800
Aleut Corporation................................... 15,500 15,500 n/a 0 15,500 15,500 n/a 0
Bogoslof District ICA \7\............................. 10 n/a n/a n/a 10 n/a n/a n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), the Bering Sea subarea pollock, after subtraction for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and the ICA (2.8 percent), is
allocated as a DFA as follows: inshore sector--50 percent, catcher/processor sector--40 percent, and mothership sector--10 percent. In the Bering Sea
subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is allocated to the A season (January 20-June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the B season (June 10-
November 1). Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual AI pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing
allowance (10 percent) and second the ICA (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery. In the AI subarea, the A
season is allocated 40 percent of the ABC and the B season is allocated the remainder of the directed pollock fishery.
\2\ In the Bering Sea subarea, no more than 28 percent of each sector's annual DFA may be taken from the SCA before April 1. The remaining 12 percent of
the annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside of SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If less than 28 percent of the
annual DFA is taken inside the SCA before April 1, the remainder will be available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1.
\3\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4), not less than 8.5 percent of the DFA allocated to listed catcher/processors shall be available for harvest
only by eligible catcher vessels delivering to listed catcher/processors.
\4\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4)(iii), the AFA unlisted catcher/processors are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of the
catcher/processors sector's allocation of pollock.
\5\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6), NMFS establishes an excessive harvesting share limit equal to 17.5 percent of the sum of the pollock DFAs.
\6\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7), NMFS establishes an excessive processing share limit equal to 30.0 percent of the sum of the pollock DFAs.
\7\ The Bogoslof District is closed by the final harvest specifications to directed fishing for pollock. The amounts specified are for ICA only, and are
not apportioned by season or sector.
Allocation of the Atka Mackerel ITAC
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(i), up to 2 percent of the Eastern
Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea Atka mackerel ITAC may be
allocated to jig gear. The amount of this allocation is determined
annually by the Council based on several criteria, including the
anticipated harvest capacity of the jig gear fleet. The Council
recommended, and NMFS approved, a 1 percent allocation of the Atka
mackerel ITAC in the Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea
subarea to the jig gear in 2007 and 2008. Based on the 2007 ITAC of
22,015 mt, the jig gear allocation would be 220 mt for 2007. Based on
the 2008 ITAC of 15,717 mt, the jig gear allocation would be 157 mt for
2008.
Section Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) apportions the Atka mackerel ITAC
into two equal seasonal allowances. After subtraction of the jig gear
allocation, the first seasonal allowance is made available for directed
fishing from January 1 (January 20 for trawl gear) to
[[Page 9457]]
April 15 (A season), and the second seasonal allowance is made
available from September 1 to November 1 (B season; Table 4).
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C)(1), the Regional
Administrator will establish a harvest limit area (HLA) limit of no
more than 60 percent of the seasonal TAC for the Western and Central
Aleutian Districts. A lottery system is used for the HLA Atka mackerel
directed fisheries to reduce the amount of daily catch in the HLA by
about half and to disperse the fishery over two districts (see Sec.
679.20(a)(8)(iii)).
Table 4.--2007 and 2008 Seasonal and Spatial Allowances, Gear Shares, and CDQ Reserve of the BSAI ATKA Mackerel TAC\1\
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 Seasonal allowances \3\
2007 CDQ -------------------------------------------
2007 CDQ reserve A season \4\ B season \4\
Subarea and component 2007 TAC reserve \2\ HLA limit 2007 ITAC -------------------------------------------
\5\ HLA limit HLA limit
Total \5\ Total \5\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western AI District......................................... 9,600 720 432 8,880 4,440 2,664 4,440 2,664
Central AI District......................................... 29,600 2,220 1,332 27,380 13,690 8,214 13,690 8,214
EAI/BS subarea \6\.......................................... 23,800 1,785 n/a 22,015 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Jig (1%) \7\............................................ n/a n/a n/a 220 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Other gear (99%)........................................ n/a n/a n/a 21,795 10,897 n/a 10,897 n/a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... 63,000 n/a n/a n/a 29,027 n/a 29,027 n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 Seasonal allowances \3\
2008 CDQ -------------------------------------------
2008 CDQ reserve A season \4\ B season \4\
Subarea and component 2008 TAC reserve \2\ HLA limit 2008 ITAC -------------------------------------------
\5\ HLA limit HLA limit
Total \5\ Total \5\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western AI District......................................... 15,300 1,637 982 13,663 6,831 4,099 6,831 4,099
Central AI District......................................... 22,000 2,354 1,412 19,646 9,823 5,894 9,823 5,894
EAI/BS subarea \6\.......................................... 17,600 1,883 n/a 15,717 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Jig (1%) \7\............................................ n/a n/a n/a 157 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Other gear (99%)........................................ n/a n/a n/a 15,560 7,780 n/a 7,780 n/a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... 54,900 n/a n/a n/a 24,434 n/a 24,434 n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regulations at Sec. Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(ii) and 679.22(a) establish temporal and spatial limitations for the Atka mackerel fishery.
\2\ The CDQ reserve is 7.5 percent in 2007 and 10.7 percent in 2008 of the TAC for use by CDQ participants (see Sec. Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(iii), 679.31,
and section 305(i)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the MSA).
\3\ The seasonal allowances of Atka mackerel are 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season.
\4\ The A season is January 1 (January 20 for trawl gear) to April 15 and the B season is September 1 to November 1.
\5\ Harvest Limit Area (HLA) limit refers to the amount of each seasonal allowance that is available for fishing inside the HLA (see Sec. 679.2). In
2007 and 2008, 60 percent of each seasonal allowance is available for fishing inside the HLA in the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
\6\ Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea.
\7\ Regulations at Sec. 679.20 (a)(8)(i) require that up to 2 percent of the Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea ITAC be allocated to
jig gear. The amount of this allocation is 1 percent. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by season.
Allocation of the Pacific cod ITAC
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(i)(A), 2 percent of the Pacific cod
ITAC is allocated to vessels using jig gear, 51 percent to vessels
using hook-and-line or pot gear, and 47 percent to vessels using trawl
gear. Section 679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) further allocates the portion of the
Pacific cod ITAC allocated to trawl gear as 50 percent to catcher
vessels and 50 percent to catcher/processors. Section
679.20(a)(7)(i)(C)(1) sets aside a portion of the Pacific cod ITAC
allocated to hook-and-line or pot gear as an ICA of Pacific cod in
directed fisheries for groundfish using these gear types. The Regional
Administrator specifies an ICA of 500 mt for 2007 and 2008 based on
anticipated incidental catch in these fisheries. The remainder of
Pacific cod ITAC is further allocated to vessels using hook-and-line or
pot gear as the following DFAs: 80 percent to hook-and-line catcher/
processors, 0.3 percent to hook-and-line catcher vessels, 3.3 percent
to pot catcher/processors, 15 percent to pot catcher vessels, and 1.4
percent to catcher vessels under 60 ft (18.3 m) length overall (LOA)
using hook-and-line or pot gear.
Due to concerns about the potential impact of the Pacific cod
fishery on Steller sea lions and their critical habitat, the Pacific
cod ITAC is apportioned into seasonal allowances to disperse the
Pacific cod fisheries over the fishing year (see Sec. Sec.
679.20(a)(7)(iii)(A) and 679.23(e)(5)). For pot and most hook-and-line
gear, the first seasonal allowance of 60 percent of the ITAC is made
available for directed fishing from January 1 to June 10, and the
second seasonal allowance of 40 percent of the ITAC is made available
from June 10 (September 1 for pot gear) to December 31. No seasonal
harvest constraints are imposed for the Pacific cod fishery by catcher
vessels less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA using hook-and-line or pot gear.
For trawl gear, the first season is January 20 to April 1 and is
allocated 60 percent of the ITAC. The second season, April 1 to June
10, and the third season, June 10 to November 1, are each allocated 20
percent of the ITAC. The trawl catcher vessel allocation is further
allocated as 70 percent in the first season, 10 percent in the second
season and 20 percent in the third season. The trawl catcher/processor
allocation is allocated 50 percent in the first season, 30 percent in
[[Page 9458]]
the second season, and 20 percent in the third season. For jig gear,
the first season and third seasons are each allocated 40 percent of the
ITAC and the second season is allocated 20 percent of the ITAC. Table 5
lists the 2007 and 2008 allocations and seasonal apportionments of the
Pacific cod ITAC. In accordance with Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(D) and
(a)(7)(iii)(B), any unused portion of a seasonal Pacific cod allowance
will become available at the beginning of the next seasonal allowance.
Table 5.--2007 and 2008 Gear Shares and Seasonal Allowances of the BSAI Pacific Cod ITAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 2007 2007 2007 seasonal apportionment \1\ 2008 2008 2008 2008 seasonal apportionment \1\
share of subtotal share of -------------------------------------- share of subtotal share of -------------------------------------
Gear sector Percent gear percentages gear gear percentages gear
sector for gear sector Date Amount sector for gear sector Date Amount
total sectors total total sectors total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total hook-and-line/pot gear............ 51 80,537 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a 57,872 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a
Hook-and-line/pot ICA................... n/a n/a n/a 500 n/a....................... n/a n/a n/a 500 n/a....................... n/a
Hook-and-line/pot sub-total............. n/a 80,037 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a 57,372 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a
Hook-and-line C/P....................... n/a n/a 80 64,030 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 38,419 n/a 80 45,897 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 27,538
........ ........ ........... ........ Jun 10-Dec 31............. 25,611 ........ ........... ........ Jun 10-Dec 31............. 18,359
Hook-and-line CV........................ n/a n/a 0.3 240 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 144 n/a 0.3 172 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 103
........ ........ ........... ........ Jun 10-Dec 31............. 96 ........ ........... ........ Jun 10-Dec 31............. 69
Pot C/P................................. n/a n/a 3.3 2,641 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 1,586 n/a 3.3 1,893 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 1,136
........ ........ ........... ........ Sept 1-Dec 31............. 1,055 ........ ........... ........ Sept 1-Dec 31............. 757
Pot CV.................................. n/a n/a 15 12,006 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 7,203 n/a 15 8,606 Jan 1-Jun 10.............. 5,163
........ ........ ........... ........ Sept 1-Dec 31............. 4,803 ........ ........... ........ Sept 1-Dec 31............. 3,443
CV < 60 ft LOA using Hook-and-line or n/a n/a 1.4 1,121 n/a....................... n/a n/a 1.4 803 n/a....................... n/a
Pot gear.
Total Trawl Gear........................ 47 74,221 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a 53,333 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a
Trawl CV............................ ........ ........ 50 37,110 Jan 20-Apr 1.............. 25,977 ........ 50 26,666 Jan 20-Apr 1.............. 18,666
........ ........ ........... n/a Apr 1-Jun 10.............. 3,711 ........ ........... n/a Apr 1-Jun 10.............. 2,667
........ ........ ........... n/a Jun 10-Nov 1.............. 7,422 ........ ........... n/a Jun 10-Nov 1.............. 5,333
Trawl CP............................ ........ ........ 50 37,110 Jan 20-Apr 1.............. 18,555 ........ 50 26,666 Jan 20-Apr 1.............. 13,333
........ ........ ........... n/a Apr 1-Jun 10.............. 11,133 ........ ........... n/a Apr 1-Jun 10.............. 8,000
........ ........ ........... n/a Jun 10-Nov 1.............. 7,422 ........ ........... n/a Jun 10-Nov 1.............. 5,333
Jig..................................... 2 3,158 n/a n/a Jan 1-Apr 30.............. 1,263 2,269 n/a n/a Jan 1-Apr 30.............. 908
........ ........ n/a n/a Apr 30-Aug 31............. 632 ........ n/a n/a Apr 30-Aug 31............. 453
........ ........ n/a n/a Aug 31-Dec 31............. 1,263 ........ n/a n/a Aug 31-Dec 31............. 908
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 100 157,916 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a 113,474 n/a n/a n/a....................... n/a
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For most non-trawl gear the first season is allocated 60 percent of the ITAC and the second season is allocated 40 percent of the ITAC. For jig gear, the first season and third seasons are
each allocated 40 percent of the ITAC and the second season is allocated 20 percent of the ITAC. No seasonal harvest constraints are imposed for the Pacific cod fishery by catcher vessels
less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA using hook-and-line or pot gear. For trawl gear, the first season is allocated 60 percent of the ITAC and the second and third seasons are each allocated 20
percent of the ITAC. The trawl catcher vessels' allocation is further allocated as 70 percent in the first season, 10 percent in the second season and 20 percent in the third season. The
trawl catcher/processors' allocation is allocated 50 percent in the first season, 30 percent in
