Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Youth Leadership Program for Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Nicaragua, 9374-9380 [E7-3635]
Download as PDF
9374
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
disclosure of the subject records for
matching purposes.
E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching
Program
The matching program will become
effective no sooner than 40 days after
notice of the matching program is sent
to Congress and OMB, or 30 days after
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, whichever date is later. The
matching program will continue for 18
months from the effective date and may
be extended for an additional 12 months
thereafter, if certain conditions are met.
[FR Doc. E7–3578 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA–2007–0014]
Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended;
Computer Matching Program (Social
Security Administration (SSA)/Law
Enforcement Agencies (LA))—Match
Number 5001
AGENCY:
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
Notice of a renewal computer
matching program, which is expected to
begin April 9, 2007.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
provisions of the Privacy Act, as
amended, this notice announces a
computer matching program that SSA
plans to conduct with the Law
Enforcement Agencies.
DATES: SSA will file a report of the
subject matching program with the
Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the
Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform of the House of
Representatives, and the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The matching program will be
effective as indicated below.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
comment on this notice by either
telefaxing to (410) 965–8582 or writing
to the Associate Commissioner, Office of
Income Security Programs, 252
Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401.
All comments received will be available
for public inspection at this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Associate Commissioner for Income
Security Programs as shown above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. General
The Computer Matching and Privacy
Protection Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
503), amended the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a) by describing the manner in
which computer matching involving
Federal agencies could be performed
and adding certain protections for
individuals applying for, and receiving,
Federal benefits. Section 7201 of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1990 (Pub. L. 101–508) further amended
the Privacy Act regarding protections for
such individuals.
The Privacy Act, as amended,
regulates the use of computer matching
by Federal agencies when records in a
system of records are matched with
other Federal, State, or local government
records. It requires Federal agencies
involved in computer matching
programs to:
(1) Negotiate written agreements with
the other agency or agencies
participating in the matching programs;
(2) Obtain the Data Integrity Boards’
approval of the match agreements;
(3) Publish notice of the computer
matching program in the Federal
Register;
(4) Furnish detailed reports about
matching programs to Congress and
OMB;
(5) Notify applicants and beneficiaries
that their records are subject to
matching; and
(6) Verify match findings before
reducing, suspending, terminating, or
denying an individual’s benefits or
payments.
B. SSA Computer Matches Subject to
the Privacy Act
We have taken action to ensure that
all of SSA’s computer matching
programs comply with the requirements
of the Privacy Act, as amended.
Dated: February 23, 2007.
Martin H. Gerry,
Deputy Commissioner for Disability and
Income Security Programs.
Notice of Computer Matching Program,
Social Security Administration (SSA)
With Law Enforcement Agencies (LA)
A. Participating Agencies
C. Authority for Conducting the
Matching Program
This matching program is carried out
under the authority of sections
202(x)(1)(A)(iv) and (v), 202(x)(3),
205(j)(2), 804(a)(2), 807(b) and (d),
1611(e)(4) and (5) and 1631(a)(2) of the
Social Security Act.
D. Categories of Records and
Individuals Covered by the Matching
Program
LA will submit names and other
identifying information of individuals
who are fugitive felons or parole or
probation violators. The Master Files of
Social Security Numbers (SSN) Holder
and SSN Applications system of
records, SSA/OEEAS 60–0058, contains
the SSNs and identifying information
for all SSN holders. The Master
Beneficiary Record system of records,
SSA/ORSIS 60–0090, and the
Supplemental Income Record/Special
Veterans Benefit system of records,
SSA/OEEAS 60–0103, contain
beneficiary and payment information.
The Master Representative Payee File
system of records, SSA/OISP 60–0222,
contains information on individuals
acting in a representative payee
capacity. SSA will match data from
these systems of records with data
received from the LAs as a first step in
detecting certain fugitive felons and
parole or probation violators who
should not be receiving benefits under
titles II, VIII or XVI or who are
prohibited from serving as a
representative payee.
E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching
Program
The matching program will become
effective no sooner than 40 days after
notice of the matching program is sent
to Congress and OMB, or 30 days after
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, whichever date is later. The
matching program will continue for 18
months from the effective date and may
be extended for an additional 12 months
thereafter, if certain conditions are met.
[FR Doc. E7–3580 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
SSA and LA.
B. Purpose of the Matching Program
The purpose of this matching program
is to establish the conditions under
which LA agree to disclose fugitive
felon and parole or probation violator
information to SSA. SSA will use this
information to determine eligibility
under titles II, VIII, and XVI of the
Social Security Act and to select
representative payees.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5703]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Youth Leadership Program
for Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia,
and Nicaragua
Announcement Type: New Grant.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–07–23.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Application Deadline: April 20, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs
Division, of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces
an open competition for the Youth
Leadership Program for Venezuela,
Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Nicaragua.
Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit
proposals to recruit and select youth
and adult participants in Venezuela,
Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and/or
Nicaragua and to provide the
participants with short-term, U.S.-based
exchanges focused on civic education,
community activism, and leadership
along with follow-on projects in their
home communities.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, as amended, Public Law 87–
256, also known as the Fulbright-Hays
Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic,
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Overview
This Youth Leadership Program will
enable teenagers (ages 15–18) and adult
educators to participate in intensive,
thematic, month-long (25–30 days)
projects that are designed to promote
high-quality leadership, civic
responsibility, and civic activism among
the future leaders of Bolivia, Ecuador,
Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela, and the
United States. Projects will involve a
practical examination of the principles
of democracy and civil society as
practiced in the United States and
provide participants with training that
allows them to develop their leadership
skills. Participants will be engaged in a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
variety of activities such as workshops,
community and/or school-based
programs, seminars, and other activities
that are designed to achieve the projects’
stated goals and objectives. Multiple
opportunities for participants to interact
with American youth and educators
must be included.
The goals of the programs are:
(1) To promote mutual understanding
between the United States and the
people of Central and South America;
(2) To develop a sense of civic
responsibility and commitment to
community development among youth;
(3) To foster relationships among
youth from different ethnic, religious,
and national groups.
With the specific focus of this
program, the following outcomes will
indicate a successful project:
• Participants will demonstrate a
better understanding of the elements of
a participatory democracy as practiced
in the United States.
• Participants will demonstrate
critical thinking and leadership skills.
• Participants will demonstrate skill
at developing project ideas and
planning a course of action to bring the
projects to fruition.
Applicant organizations should
identify their own specific objectives
and measurable outcomes based on
these program goals and the project
specifications provided in this
solicitation.
It is anticipated that the total amount
of funding available is $500,000. Final
assistance awards are contingent on the
availability of FY–2007 funding.
Depending on the quality of proposals
submitted, the Bureau anticipates
supporting five discrete projects, each
funded at approximately $100,000, one
for each of the five specified Central and
South American countries. The Bureau
makes no assurances that it will award
projects in all five countries.
Organizations may apply to implement
one or more projects. Proposals must
clearly indicate the country or countries
with which the applicant plans to work,
and budgets should be matched to the
projects. For instance, if an applicant
submits a proposal for one country/
project, its grant request should be
approximately $100,000. For two, a
request would be approximately
$200,000, and so on. The Bureau prefers
applications for two or more projects
that can offer economies of scale and
administrative efficiencies. Since cost
effectiveness is one of the proposal
review criteria, the number of
participants that can be accommodated
in each project will be a factor in the
proposal review process, though this
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9375
will be balanced with program quality
and a realistic budget.
For each project, applicants must
focus on the primary theme of civic
education. The secondary themes are
ethics and ethical leadership and
student-organized campaigns or
programs that address societal problems
such as the environment (including
littering), drug addiction prevention,
HIV/AIDS awareness, or public safety
for cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers.
Applicants may propose other social
issues appropriate for a youth program.
Secondary themes should be woven into
the activities as feasible, without
creating an overwhelming array of
topics. The applicant should present a
program plan that allows the
participants to thoroughly explore civic
education in a creative, memorable, and
practical way. Activities should be
designed to be replicable and provide
practical knowledge and skills that the
participants can apply to school and
civic activities at home. These projects
will offer bright and ambitious youth
and teachers who work with youth the
opportunity to develop their personal
skills in a positive and productive way.
Organizational Capacity
Applicant organizations must
demonstrate their capacity for doing
projects of this nature, focusing on three
areas of competency: (1) Provision of
programs that address the goals and
themes outlined in this document; (2)
age-appropriate programming for youth;
and (3) previous experience working on
programs with Central and/or South
America. Applicants must have the
organizational capacity in the partner
country(ies) necessary to implement the
in-country activities, or they must
partner with an organization or
institution with the requisite capacity to
recruit and select participants for the
program and to provide follow-on
activities.
Organizations applying to implement
more than one of the five projects must
convincingly demonstrate their capacity
to manage a complex, multi-phase
program with several separate projects.
The organization’s ability to administer
more than one project successfully must
be thoroughly discussed and proven in
the proposal.
Guidelines
Pending the availability of funds, the
grants will begin on or about September
1, 2007. The grant period will be 12 to
18 months in duration, as appropriate
for the applicant’s program design. Each
25- to 30-day exchange program in the
United States will take place during the
school break in the partner country; see
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
9376
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
specific information below. The exact
timing of the project may be adjusted
through the mutual agreement of the
Department of State and the grant
recipient.
The grant recipients will be
responsible for the following:
• Recruitment and selection of youth
and adult educators from diverse
geographic regions in the partner
countries. The Public Affairs Section of
the U.S. Embassy in the partner country
will have a key role in developing a
recruitment strategy and deciding how
finalists are chosen.
• Provision of orientations for
exchange participants and for those
participating in the host communities.
• Designing and planning of activities
that provide a substantive project on the
theme of civic education, as well as on
leadership development, community
service, and suggested secondary
themes. Some activities should be
school and/or community-based, as
feasible, and the projects will involve as
much sustained interaction with
American peers as possible.
• Arrangement of homestays with
American families.
• Logistical arrangements, including
visa applications, international and
domestic travel, accommodations, and
disbursement of stipends.
• Follow-on activities in the partner
country that reinforce the ideas, values
and skills imparted during the U.S.
program through community projects.
Recruitment and Selection: The grant
recipients will manage the recruitment
and merit-based selection of
participants in cooperation with the
Public Affairs Sections of the U.S.
Embassies in La Paz, Quito, Managua,
Lima, and Caracas. Once a grant is
awarded, the grant recipient must
consult with the Public Affairs Section
at the U.S. Embassy to review a
recruitment and participant selection
plan and to determine the degree of
Embassy involvement in the process.
Organizers must strive for regional,
socio-economic, and ethnic diversity, as
well as gender balance. Collaboration
with Bi-National Commissions is
suggested, if possible. The Department
of State and/or its overseas
representatives are responsible for final
approval of all selected delegations.
Participants: The youth participants
will be teenagers 15 to 18 years old who
have demonstrated leadership aptitude
and a commitment to their
communities. The exchange participants
will also include adults who are
teachers, school administrators, and/or
community leaders who work with
youth; they will have the dual role of
both exchange participant and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
chaperone. Participants will have
enough proficiency in English to
communicate with their host families
and their American peers but, if
necessary, the grantee organization will
provide interpretation to assist with
educational activities.
U.S. Program: High schools students
and educators will spend 25 to 30 days
in the United States—in Washington,
DC, and in one or two other
communities—on an intensive program
that is designed to develop the
participants’ knowledge and skill base
in civic education and community
activism as well as in youth leadership
development.
The U.S. program should focus
primarily on interactive activities,
practical experiences, and other handson opportunities related to the program
themes. All programming should
include American teenagers wherever
possible. The program will also provide
opportunities for the adult educators to
work with their American peers.
Cultural, social, and recreational
activities will balance the schedule.
Participants will live with American
families in homestays for at least half of
the exchange period.
Follow-on Activities and In-Country
Programming: In-country activities that
help to support alumni in their postexchange activities are required, and
should enable the alumni to share their
experiences and apply their skills.
Applicant organizations should present
creative and effective ways to address
the project themes, for both program
participants and their peers, as a means
to amplify the program impact. U.S.
project staff or trainers may travel to the
partner country several months after the
exchange to conduct trainings that
reinforce the themes of the exchange;
they may be accompanied by American
teenagers if supported through costsharing.
Country Specific Information
Applicants are required to follow
program information for each country,
where provided.
Bolivia: Timeframe for U.S.
exchange—November 15, 2007, to
January 31, 2008. Include topic of
creating a sound national identity that
unites citizens and the role of the
citizen in confronting issues such as
corruption and accountability.
Ecuador: Timeframe for U.S.
exchange—January 2008. Recruitment
should be in both the highlands and in
the coastal area, though please note that
with an exchange in January, students
in the highlands would miss some
school at home.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nicaragua: Timeframe for U.S.
exchange—December 1, 2007, to January
30, 2008. Include topic of studentorganized campaigns by looking at
socio-economic, educational and
political empowerment groups.
Peru: Timeframe for U.S. exchange—
January 1 to February 20, 2008.
Applicants should plan on collaborating
with Bi-National Commissions (BNCs)
for recruitment. Contact the embassy for
more information.
Venezuela: Timeframe for U.S.
exchange—August 1 to September 15,
2008.
Proposals must demonstrate how the
stated objectives will be met. The
proposal narrative should provide
detailed information on the major
program activities, and applicants
should explain and justify their
programmatic choices. Programs must
comply with J–1 visa regulations for the
International Visitor category. Please be
sure to refer to the complete Solicitation
Package—this RFGP, the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI), and the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI)—for further
information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: One
to five.
Floor of Award Range: $100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September
1, 2007, pending the availability of
funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
12–18 months after start date, to be
specified by applicant based on project
plan.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew these grants for two
additional fiscal years before openly
competing them again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs that are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding grants in amounts over
$60,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are not eligible
to apply under this competition. The
Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/
C/PY), Room 568, U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone (202)
203–7505, Fax (202) 203–7529, E-mail:
LantzCS@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/
C/PY–07–23) located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria, and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer
Carolyn Lantz and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number located at the top
of this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 form that
is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9377
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All
Regulations Governing The J Visa.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the Responsible Officer for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of
the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving grants
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects
that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places great emphasis
on the secure and proper administration
of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
and adherence by grantee program
organizations and program participants
to all regulations governing the J visa
program status. Therefore, proposals
should explicitly state in writing that the
applicant is prepared to assist the
Bureau in meeting all requirements
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth
in 22 CFR part 62. If the applicant
organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
its record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, recordkeeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
9378
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines.
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation.
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the grantee will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) Specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Awards may not exceed the
amount specified. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants applying
to implement more than one project
must provide separate sub-budgets for
each.
Please refer to the other documents in
the Solicitation Package for complete
budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: April 20,
2007.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–
07–23.
Methods of Submission
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the
SF–424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications.
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original, one fully-tabbed copy,
and six copies of the application with
Tabs A–E (for a total of 8 copies) should
be sent to: U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY–
07–23, Program Management, ECA/EX/
PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the
SF–424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
Applicants must also submit the
executive summary, proposal narrative,
budget section, and any important
appendices as e-mail attachments in
Microsoft Word and Excel to the
following e-mail address:
LantzCS@state.gov. In the e-mail
message subject line, include the name
of the applicant organization and the
partner country. The Bureau will
transmit these files electronically to the
Public Affairs Sections of the U.S.
Embassies in the participating countries
for their review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic
Applications.
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system. Please
follow the instructions available in the
‘Get Started’ portion of the site (https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726,
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9379
Review Criteria
Please see the review criteria in the
accompanying Project Objectives, Goals,
and Implementation (POGI) document.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.,
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements.
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
9380
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
(2) Interim reports, as required in the
Bureau grant agreement.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements
VII. Agency Contacts
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz,
Program Officer, Youth Programs
Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568,
U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301
4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
Telephone (202) 203–7505, Fax (202)
203–7529, E-mail: LantzCS@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
PY–07–23.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
Dated: February 22, 2007.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7–3635 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three workdays prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5704]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant
Proposals: Youth Leadership Program
for Indonesia
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–07–29.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Application Deadline:
April 26, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs
Division, of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs announces an open
competition for a Youth Leadership
Program with Indonesia. Public and
private non-profit organizations meeting
the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
recruit and select youth and adult
participants overseas and to provide the
participants with a U.S.-based exchange
project focused on civic education,
leadership, tolerance and respect for
diversity, and community activism.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Youth Leadership
Program for Indonesia enables teenagers
(ages 15–17) and adult educators to
participate in intensive, thematic,
month-long project in the United States
that complement a more formal
education in the principles of a civil
society. Participants will be engaged in
a variety of activities such as
workshops, community and/or schoolbased programs, cultural activities,
seminars and other activities designed
to achieve the project’s stated goals and
objectives. Opportunities for
participants to interact with American
youth and adult educators will be
included as much as possible.
The goals of the program are:
(1) To develop a sense of civic
responsibility and commitment to
community development among youth;
(2) to develop a cadre of community
activists who will share their knowledge
and skills with their peers through
positive action;
(2) To foster relationships among
youth from different ethnic, religious,
and national groups;
(3) To promote mutual understanding
between the United States and the
people of other countries.
Program Objective: To introduce
students and educators from Indonesia
to the principles of democracy, civil
society, and youth leadership as they
are practiced in the United States, with
an additional focus on volunteerism,
community activism and peer education
(how one can influence one’s peers
toward positive change; for example, an
anti-smoking campaign directed to
teens).
Applicants should identify their own
specific objectives and measurable
outcomes based on these program goals
and the project specifications provided
in this solicitation.
Applicants must demonstrate their
capacity for doing projects of this
nature, focusing on three areas of
competency: (1) Provision of programs
that address the goals and themes
outlined in this document; (2) ageappropriate programming for youth; and
(3) previous experience in working with
Indonesia. Applicants, or their partner
organizations, need to have the
necessary capacity in Indonesia to
recruit and select participants for the
program and to provide follow-on
activities.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9374-9380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3635]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5703]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Youth Leadership Program for Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru,
Bolivia, and Nicaragua
Announcement Type: New Grant.
[[Page 9375]]
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-23.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Application Deadline: April 20, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs
Division, of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
announces an open competition for the Youth Leadership Program for
Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Nicaragua. Public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
recruit and select youth and adult participants in Venezuela, Ecuador,
Peru, Bolivia, and/or Nicaragua and to provide the participants with
short-term, U.S.-based exchanges focused on civic education, community
activism, and leadership along with follow-on projects in their home
communities.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended,
Public Law 87-256, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Overview
This Youth Leadership Program will enable teenagers (ages 15-18)
and adult educators to participate in intensive, thematic, month-long
(25-30 days) projects that are designed to promote high-quality
leadership, civic responsibility, and civic activism among the future
leaders of Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela, and the United
States. Projects will involve a practical examination of the principles
of democracy and civil society as practiced in the United States and
provide participants with training that allows them to develop their
leadership skills. Participants will be engaged in a variety of
activities such as workshops, community and/or school-based programs,
seminars, and other activities that are designed to achieve the
projects' stated goals and objectives. Multiple opportunities for
participants to interact with American youth and educators must be
included.
The goals of the programs are:
(1) To promote mutual understanding between the United States and
the people of Central and South America;
(2) To develop a sense of civic responsibility and commitment to
community development among youth;
(3) To foster relationships among youth from different ethnic,
religious, and national groups.
With the specific focus of this program, the following outcomes
will indicate a successful project:
Participants will demonstrate a better understanding of
the elements of a participatory democracy as practiced in the United
States.
Participants will demonstrate critical thinking and
leadership skills.
Participants will demonstrate skill at developing project
ideas and planning a course of action to bring the projects to
fruition.
Applicant organizations should identify their own specific
objectives and measurable outcomes based on these program goals and the
project specifications provided in this solicitation.
It is anticipated that the total amount of funding available is
$500,000. Final assistance awards are contingent on the availability of
FY-2007 funding. Depending on the quality of proposals submitted, the
Bureau anticipates supporting five discrete projects, each funded at
approximately $100,000, one for each of the five specified Central and
South American countries. The Bureau makes no assurances that it will
award projects in all five countries. Organizations may apply to
implement one or more projects. Proposals must clearly indicate the
country or countries with which the applicant plans to work, and
budgets should be matched to the projects. For instance, if an
applicant submits a proposal for one country/project, its grant request
should be approximately $100,000. For two, a request would be
approximately $200,000, and so on. The Bureau prefers applications for
two or more projects that can offer economies of scale and
administrative efficiencies. Since cost effectiveness is one of the
proposal review criteria, the number of participants that can be
accommodated in each project will be a factor in the proposal review
process, though this will be balanced with program quality and a
realistic budget.
For each project, applicants must focus on the primary theme of
civic education. The secondary themes are ethics and ethical leadership
and student-organized campaigns or programs that address societal
problems such as the environment (including littering), drug addiction
prevention, HIV/AIDS awareness, or public safety for cyclists,
pedestrians, and drivers. Applicants may propose other social issues
appropriate for a youth program. Secondary themes should be woven into
the activities as feasible, without creating an overwhelming array of
topics. The applicant should present a program plan that allows the
participants to thoroughly explore civic education in a creative,
memorable, and practical way. Activities should be designed to be
replicable and provide practical knowledge and skills that the
participants can apply to school and civic activities at home. These
projects will offer bright and ambitious youth and teachers who work
with youth the opportunity to develop their personal skills in a
positive and productive way.
Organizational Capacity
Applicant organizations must demonstrate their capacity for doing
projects of this nature, focusing on three areas of competency: (1)
Provision of programs that address the goals and themes outlined in
this document; (2) age-appropriate programming for youth; and (3)
previous experience working on programs with Central and/or South
America. Applicants must have the organizational capacity in the
partner country(ies) necessary to implement the in-country activities,
or they must partner with an organization or institution with the
requisite capacity to recruit and select participants for the program
and to provide follow-on activities.
Organizations applying to implement more than one of the five
projects must convincingly demonstrate their capacity to manage a
complex, multi-phase program with several separate projects. The
organization's ability to administer more than one project successfully
must be thoroughly discussed and proven in the proposal.
Guidelines
Pending the availability of funds, the grants will begin on or
about September 1, 2007. The grant period will be 12 to 18 months in
duration, as appropriate for the applicant's program design. Each 25-
to 30-day exchange program in the United States will take place during
the school break in the partner country; see
[[Page 9376]]
specific information below. The exact timing of the project may be
adjusted through the mutual agreement of the Department of State and
the grant recipient.
The grant recipients will be responsible for the following:
Recruitment and selection of youth and adult educators
from diverse geographic regions in the partner countries. The Public
Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy in the partner country will have a
key role in developing a recruitment strategy and deciding how
finalists are chosen.
Provision of orientations for exchange participants and
for those participating in the host communities.
Designing and planning of activities that provide a
substantive project on the theme of civic education, as well as on
leadership development, community service, and suggested secondary
themes. Some activities should be school and/or community-based, as
feasible, and the projects will involve as much sustained interaction
with American peers as possible.
Arrangement of homestays with American families.
Logistical arrangements, including visa applications,
international and domestic travel, accommodations, and disbursement of
stipends.
Follow-on activities in the partner country that reinforce
the ideas, values and skills imparted during the U.S. program through
community projects.
Recruitment and Selection: The grant recipients will manage the
recruitment and merit-based selection of participants in cooperation
with the Public Affairs Sections of the U.S. Embassies in La Paz,
Quito, Managua, Lima, and Caracas. Once a grant is awarded, the grant
recipient must consult with the Public Affairs Section at the U.S.
Embassy to review a recruitment and participant selection plan and to
determine the degree of Embassy involvement in the process. Organizers
must strive for regional, socio-economic, and ethnic diversity, as well
as gender balance. Collaboration with Bi-National Commissions is
suggested, if possible. The Department of State and/or its overseas
representatives are responsible for final approval of all selected
delegations.
Participants: The youth participants will be teenagers 15 to 18
years old who have demonstrated leadership aptitude and a commitment to
their communities. The exchange participants will also include adults
who are teachers, school administrators, and/or community leaders who
work with youth; they will have the dual role of both exchange
participant and chaperone. Participants will have enough proficiency in
English to communicate with their host families and their American
peers but, if necessary, the grantee organization will provide
interpretation to assist with educational activities.
U.S. Program: High schools students and educators will spend 25 to
30 days in the United States--in Washington, DC, and in one or two
other communities--on an intensive program that is designed to develop
the participants' knowledge and skill base in civic education and
community activism as well as in youth leadership development.
The U.S. program should focus primarily on interactive activities,
practical experiences, and other hands-on opportunities related to the
program themes. All programming should include American teenagers
wherever possible. The program will also provide opportunities for the
adult educators to work with their American peers. Cultural, social,
and recreational activities will balance the schedule. Participants
will live with American families in homestays for at least half of the
exchange period.
Follow-on Activities and In-Country Programming: In-country
activities that help to support alumni in their post-exchange
activities are required, and should enable the alumni to share their
experiences and apply their skills. Applicant organizations should
present creative and effective ways to address the project themes, for
both program participants and their peers, as a means to amplify the
program impact. U.S. project staff or trainers may travel to the
partner country several months after the exchange to conduct trainings
that reinforce the themes of the exchange; they may be accompanied by
American teenagers if supported through cost-sharing.
Country Specific Information
Applicants are required to follow program information for each
country, where provided.
Bolivia: Timeframe for U.S. exchange--November 15, 2007, to January
31, 2008. Include topic of creating a sound national identity that
unites citizens and the role of the citizen in confronting issues such
as corruption and accountability.
Ecuador: Timeframe for U.S. exchange--January 2008. Recruitment
should be in both the highlands and in the coastal area, though please
note that with an exchange in January, students in the highlands would
miss some school at home.
Nicaragua: Timeframe for U.S. exchange--December 1, 2007, to
January 30, 2008. Include topic of student-organized campaigns by
looking at socio-economic, educational and political empowerment
groups.
Peru: Timeframe for U.S. exchange--January 1 to February 20, 2008.
Applicants should plan on collaborating with Bi-National Commissions
(BNCs) for recruitment. Contact the embassy for more information.
Venezuela: Timeframe for U.S. exchange--August 1 to September 15,
2008.
Proposals must demonstrate how the stated objectives will be met.
The proposal narrative should provide detailed information on the major
program activities, and applicants should explain and justify their
programmatic choices. Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations
for the International Visitor category. Please be sure to refer to the
complete Solicitation Package--this RFGP, the Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI), and the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI)--for further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: One to five.
Floor of Award Range: $100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September 1, 2007, pending the availability
of funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: 12-18 months after start date,
to be specified by applicant based on project plan.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew these grants for two additional fiscal years
before openly competing them again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
[[Page 9377]]
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
that are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: (a) Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau
funding. ECA anticipates awarding grants in amounts over $60,000 to
support program and administrative costs required to implement this
exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international exchanges are not eligible to
apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its
programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568, U.S.
Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
Telephone (202) 203-7505, Fax (202) 203-7529, E-mail: LantzCS@state.gov
to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY-07-23) located at the top of this
announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria,
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer Carolyn Lantz and refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number located at the top of this announcement
on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 form that is part of the formal
application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing The J Visa.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
Responsible Officer for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part 62,
which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations receiving
grants under this RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating with or
assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The
actions of grantee program organizations shall be ``imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR part 62.
Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable
the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places great
emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If the applicant organization has
experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the
applicant should discuss its record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62
et seq., including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW.,
[[Page 9378]]
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029, FAX: (202) 453-8640.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines.
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
`Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation.
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the grantee will track participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the
program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a
result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The
evaluation plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) Specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Awards may not exceed the amount specified. There must
be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants applying to implement
more than one project must provide separate sub-budgets for each.
Please refer to the other documents in the Solicitation Package for
complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: April 20, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-23.
Methods of Submission
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications.
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
[[Page 9379]]
further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after
the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this
competition. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of application. It is
each applicant's responsibility to ensure that each package is marked
with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA
via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via
local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original, one fully-tabbed copy, and six copies of the
application with Tabs A-E (for a total of 8 copies) should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-23, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
Applicants must also submit the executive summary, proposal
narrative, budget section, and any important appendices as e-mail
attachments in Microsoft Word and Excel to the following e-mail
address: LantzCS@state.gov. In the e-mail message subject line, include
the name of the applicant organization and the partner country. The
Bureau will transmit these files electronically to the Public Affairs
Sections of the U.S. Embassies in the participating countries for their
review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic Applications.
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726, Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (grants) resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Please see the review criteria in the accompanying Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants., https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements.
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
[[Page 9380]]
(2) Interim reports, as required in the Bureau grant agreement.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements
Organizations awarded grants will be required to maintain specific
data on program participants and activities in an electronically
accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three workdays prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz,
Program Officer, Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568, U.S.
Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
Telephone (202) 203-7505, Fax (202) 203-7529, E-mail:
LantzCS@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/PY-07-23.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: February 22, 2007.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E7-3635 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P