Optometrists as “Acceptable Medical Sources” To Establish a Medically Determinable Impairment, 9239-9242 [E7-3577]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on February
16, 2007.
Walter Tweedy,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO
Central Service Area.
[FR Doc. 07–903 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Optometrists as ‘‘Acceptable Medical
Sources’’ To Establish a Medically
Determinable Impairment
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA–2006–0085]
RIN 0960–AG05
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Social Security Administration.
Final rules.
AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration
ACTION:
14 CFR Part 71
SUMMARY: We are revising the Social
Security and Supplemental Security
Income (SSI) disability regulations
regarding sources of evidence for
establishing a medically determinable
impairment under titles II and XVI of
the Social Security Act (the Act). The
revised regulations expand the
situations in which we consider
licensed optometrists to be ‘‘acceptable
medical sources.’’
DATES: These rules are effective April 2,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art
Spencer, Director, Office of Disability
Evaluation Policy, Social Security
Administration, 4465 Annex Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401, (410) 966–5766 or TTY
(410) 966–5609. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
1213, or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
our Internet Web site, Social Security
Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25943; Airspace
Docket No. 06–ACE–13]
Modification of Class E Airspace;
Phillipsburg, KS
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document confirms the
effective date of the direct final rule
which revises Class E airspace at
Phillipsburg, KS.
Effective Date: 0901 UTC, May
10, 2007.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:
(816) 329–2522.
The FAA
published this direct final rule with a
request for comments in the Federal
Register on January 18, 2007 (72 FR
2181). The FAA uses the direct final
rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA
believes that there will be no adverse
public comment. This direct final rule
advised the public that no adverse
comments were anticipated, and that
unless a written adverse comment, or a
written notice of intent to submit such
an adverse comment, were received
within the comment period, the
regulation would become effective on
May 10, 2007. No adverse comments
were received, and thus this notice
confirms that this direct final rule will
become effective on that date.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Forth Worth, Texas on February
16, 2007.
Walter Tweedy,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO
Central Service Area.
[FR Doc. 07–902 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is
available on the date of publication in
the Federal Register at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
What is an ‘‘acceptable medical
source?’’
Our rules provide that you must show
that you have a medically determinable
impairment with evidence from an
‘‘acceptable medical source.’’ An
‘‘acceptable medical source’’ is an
individual who has the training and
expertise to provide us with the signs
and laboratory findings based on
medically acceptable clinical and
laboratory diagnostic techniques that
establish a medically determinable
physical or mental impairment. Our
regulations identify professionals whom
we consider to be ‘‘acceptable medical
sources.’’ (See §§ 404.1513(a) and
416.913(a).) In our prior rules, these
sections provided that a licensed
optometrist was an ‘‘acceptable medical
source,’’ but only for the measurement
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9239
of visual acuity and visual fields. They
further indicated that, for claims under
title II, we might need a report from a
physician to determine other aspects of
eye diseases.
Our rules in §§ 404.1513(d) and
416.913(d) provide that, once we have
established that you have a medically
determinable impairment, we consider
all other relevant evidence from other
medical and non-medical sources,
including your own statements, to
determine its severity and how it affects
you.
Why are we changing our rules?
In the early 1990s, we discussed
expanding the role of optometrists as
‘‘acceptable medical sources’’ with the
American Optometric Association
(AOA). However, because licensing
requirements and scope of practice
varied considerably among jurisdictions
at that time, we found that it was not
feasible for us to revise our policy.
More recently, we again met with
representatives of the AOA and
obtained information about the
education, qualifications, and State
scope-of-practice requirements related
to optometrists. Based on our review of
accreditation and practice requirements,
we have determined that, with the
exception of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the
licensing requirements, scope of
treatment, and diagnostic protocols for
licensed optometrists are sufficient to
qualify all licensed optometrists as
‘‘acceptable medical sources’’ for visual
disorders. Therefore, it is now
appropriate to revise our regulations to
authorize licensed optometrists to be
‘‘acceptable medical sources’’ for visual
disorders in all jurisdictions but the
U.S. Virgin Islands.1
The revised regulations expand the
situations in which we consider
licensed optometrists to be ‘‘acceptable
medical sources.’’ These revised
regulations will allow us to make more
decisions based on medical evidence
supplied to us solely from optometrists,
rather than having to purchase timeconsuming and expensive consultative
examinations with ophthalmologists.
Therefore, these regulations will help
some individuals with visual disorders
qualify for benefits more quickly.
1 The U.S. Virgin Islands does not allow
optometrists to administer or prescribe
pharmaceuticals, including topical application of
pharmaceuticals for diagnostic or treatment
purposes. Because a complete evaluation of the eye
includes the use of diagnostic pharmaceuticals,
optometrists in the U.S. Virgin Islands are not
qualified to perform a complete evaluation of the
eye.
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
9240
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
What rules are we revising?
How do we define blindness?
We are revising §§ 404.1513(a)(3) and
416.913(a)(3) to provide that, except in
the U.S. Virgin Islands, licensed
optometrists are ‘‘acceptable medical
sources’’ for purposes of establishing a
medically determinable impairment for
visual disorders only. However, we are
maintaining our current rules for
licensed optometrists in the U.S. Virgin
Islands, where these individuals will
continue to be ‘‘acceptable medical
sources’’ for measurement of visual
acuity and visual fields only.
For both the title II and title XVI
programs, the Act defines blindness as
‘‘central visual acuity of 20/200 or less
in the better eye with the use of a
correcting lens. An eye which is
accompanied by a limitation in the
fields of vision such that the widest
diameter of the visual field subtends an
angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be
considered * * * as having a central
visual acuity of 20/200 or less.’’ (See
sections 216(i)(1) and 1614(a)(2) of the
Act.)
Title II of the Act does not provide a
separate category of benefits based on
blindness. However, you may be
entitled to benefits based on disability
under title II of the Act if you are blind.
By contrast, title XVI of the Act
provides for a category of payments
based on blindness as well as a category
of payments based on disability. If you
are blind and meet the SSI income and
resources requirements, you may be
eligible for SSI payments based on
blindness. Your blindness does not have
to meet a 12-month duration
requirement for you to be eligible for
these payments. Also, there is no
requirement that you must be unable to
do any SGA. However, if you are
working, we will consider your earnings
to determine if you are eligible for SSI
payments.
What programs do these revised
regulations affect?
These revised rules affect disability
and blindness determinations and
decisions that we make under titles II
and XVI of the Act. In addition, to the
extent that Medicare entitlement and
Medicaid eligibility are based on
whether you qualify for disability
benefits under title II or disability or
blindness under title XVI, these rules
affect the Medicare and Medicaid
programs.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Who can get disability benefits?
Under title II of the Act, we provide
for the payment of disability benefits if
you are disabled and belong to one of
the following three groups:
• Workers insured under the Act,
• Children of insured workers, and
• Widows, widowers, and surviving
divorced spouses (see § 404.336) of
insured workers.
Under title II of the Act, you may
qualify for a period of disability if you
are insured for disability under Social
Security and have a disability as defined
in section 216(i)(1) of the Act. That
section defines disability to include
statutory blindness, for purposes of
establishing a period of disability under
title II. If we find that you are blind and
you meet the insured status
requirement, we may establish a period
of disability for you regardless of
whether you can do substantial gainful
activity (SGA). A period of disability
protects your earnings record under
Social Security so that the time you are
disabled will not count against you in
determining whether you will have
worked long enough to qualify for
benefits and the amount of your
benefits. See §§ 404.320, 404.1505,
404.1581, and 404.1582.
Under title XVI of the Act, we provide
for SSI payments on the basis of
disability or blindness if you are
disabled or blind and have limited
income and resources.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
How do we decide whether you are
disabled?
If you are applying for disability
benefits under title II of the Act,
§ 404.1513(a) of our regulations
provides that we need evidence from
‘‘acceptable medical sources’’ to
establish whether you have a medically
determinable impairment(s). Therefore,
in general, to be entitled to disability
benefits under title II, your blindness
must result from a medically
determinable impairment and meet the
12-month duration requirement. (See
§§ 404.1508, 404.1513, and 404.1581.)
Also, if you are under age 55, you must
be unable to do any SGA. (See
§§ 404.1582 and 404.1584(b).) Even
though you are doing SGA, we may still
find that you are entitled to title II
disability benefits if—
• You are blind;
• You are age 55 or older; and
• You are unable to use skills or
abilities like the ones you used in any
SGA which you did regularly and for a
substantial period of time. However, we
will not pay you any cash benefits for
any month in which you are doing SGA.
(See §§ 404.1583 and 404.1584(c).)
Section 416.913(a) of our regulations
provides that if you are claiming
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
benefits under title XVI on the basis of
disability, not blindness, your disability
must result from a medically
determinable impairment documented
by ‘‘acceptable medical sources.’’
However, blindness is treated
differently under title XVI of the Act.
Under title XVI, blindness and disability
are separate categories of SSI payments,
and the requirements for eligibility
based on blindness are different from
the requirements for eligibility based on
disability. Under title XVI, the only
evidence we need to establish statutory
blindness is evidence showing that your
visual acuity or visual field, in the better
eye, meets the criteria described in
§ 416.981 of our regulations, provided
that those measurements are consistent
with the other evidence in your case
record. We do not need to determine the
cause of your blindness for you to be
eligible for SSI payments based on
blindness. Also, as provided in
§ 416.983, there is no duration
requirement for statutory blindness
under title XVI. Section 416.913(f)
provides that if you are applying for
benefits under title XVI on the basis of
statutory blindness, we will require an
examination by a physician skilled in
diseases of the eye or by an optometrist,
whichever you may select.
What is a ‘‘medically determinable
impairment?’’
We will not consider you to be
disabled or blind unless you furnish
medical and other evidence that we
need to show that you are disabled or
blind. (See sections 223(d)(5)(A) and
1614(a)(3)(H)(i) of the Act and
§§ 404.1512(a) and 416.912(a) of our
regulations.) The Act requires that you
show that your disability results from a
medically determinable physical or
mental impairment. A physical or
mental impairment is an impairment
that results from anatomical,
physiological, or psychological
abnormalities which are demonstrable
by medically acceptable clinical and
laboratory diagnostic techniques. (See
sections 223(d)(3) and 1614(a)(3)(D) of
the Act.) Our regulations provide that a
physical or mental impairment must be
established by medical evidence
consisting of signs, symptoms, and
laboratory findings. (See §§ 404.1508
and 416.908.)
What is our authority to make rules
and set procedures for determining
whether a person is disabled under the
statutory definition?
Section 205(a) of the Act and, by
reference to section 205(a), section
1631(d)(1) provide that:
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
The Commissioner of Social Security shall
have full power and authority to make rules
and regulations and to establish procedures,
not inconsistent with the provisions of this
title, which are necessary or appropriate to
carry out such provisions, and shall adopt
reasonable and proper rules and regulations
to regulate and provide for the nature and
extent of the proofs and evidence and the
method of taking and furnishing the same in
order to establish the right to benefits
hereunder.
What do we mean by ‘‘final rules’’ and
‘‘prior rules?’’
Even though these rules will not go
into effect until 30 days after
publication of this notice, for clarity we
refer to the changes we are making here
as the ‘‘final rules’’ and to the rules that
will be changed by these final rules as
the ‘‘prior rules.’’
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
When will we start to use these final
rules?
We will use these rules on their
effective date. We will continue to use
our prior rules until the effective date of
these final rules. When the final rules
become effective, we will apply them to
new applications filed on or after the
effective date of these rules and to
claims pending before us, as we
describe below.
As is our usual practice when we
make changes to our regulations, we
will apply these final rules on or after
their effective date whenever we make
a determination or decision, including
in those claims in which we make a
determination or decision after remand
to us from a Federal court. With respect
to claims in which we have made a final
decision and that are pending judicial
review in Federal court, we expect that
the court’s review of the
Commissioner’s final decision would be
made in accordance with the rules in
effect at the time the final decision of
the Commissioner was issued. If a court
reverses the Commissioner’s final
decision and remands the case for
further administrative proceedings after
the effective date of these final rules, we
will apply the provisions of these final
rules to the entire period at issue in the
claim in our new decision issued
pursuant to the court’s remand.
Public Comments
In the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) we published in the Federal
Register on March 1, 2006 (71 FR
10456), we provided the public with a
60-day comment period that ended on
May 1, 2006.
We received 25 sets of comments. The
commenters included medical
organizations, a professional association
of individuals who evaluate and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
adjudicate Social Security disability
claims, optometrists, and other
individuals.
Twenty-three commenters supported
the proposed rules. Since these
commenters did not recommend any
changes to these rules, we have not
summarized or responded to their
comments below. Because some of the
remaining comments were long, we
have condensed, summarized, and
paraphrased them below. We have tried
to present the commenters’ views
adequately and to respond to the issues
raised by the commenters that were
within the scope of the rulemaking. We
provide our reasons for adopting or not
adopting the recommendations in the
summaries of the comments and our
responses below.
Comment: A commenter disagreed
with our proposed changes on the basis
that licensed optometrists have less
training than ophthalmologists. This
commenter was concerned that the
expansion of the definition of
‘‘acceptable medical sources’’ to include
licensed optometrists might not be
appropriate.
Response: As we indicated in the
NPRM, and as noted above, we obtained
information about the education,
qualifications, and States’ scope-ofpractice requirements related to
optometrists. Based on our careful
review of this information, we have
determined that, with the exception of
the U.S. Virgin Islands, the licensing
requirements, scope of treatment, and
diagnostic protocols for licensed
optometrists are sufficient to qualify all
licensed optometrists as ‘‘acceptable
medical sources’’ for establishing the
existence of visual disorders under our
disability programs. Therefore, we have
determined that it is appropriate to
revise our regulations to make licensed
optometrists ‘‘acceptable medical
sources’’ for establishing visual
disorders in all jurisdictions but the
U.S. Virgin Islands.
With this change, we will be able to
make more decisions based on existing
medical evidence, without having to
purchase time-consuming and
expensive consultative examinations,
thereby allowing some individuals with
visual disorders to qualify for benefits
more quickly. While we respect the
knowledge, skills, and education of
ophthalmologists, our research shows
that optometrists are capable of
providing the evidence, including the
signs and laboratory findings, that we
need to establish a medically
determinable visual disorder.
Comment: Two commenters disagreed
with our proposed changes because the
law and our regulations require that a
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9241
disability be ‘‘medically determinable.’’
They believed that this meant that we
should continue to require an
examination by a treating or consulting
ophthalmologist (M.D. or D.O.) to
diagnose and establish the pathology of
disorder causing visual impairment.
One of these commenters noted the
differences between the criteria in titles
II and XVI and indicated that in the case
of title II disability findings related to
blindness, the evidence must show, and
an ‘‘acceptable medical source’’ must
agree, that a medical condition caused
the claimant’s blindness. This
commenter believed that optometrists
are not qualified to identify or evaluate
the underlying medical cause of
blindness, or to monitor, treat, and
provide prognoses for many eye
diseases that could lead to disabling
vision loss or the likely outcomes from
those interventions, because they are
not fully knowledgeable of the potential
treatments and lack the medical
training, knowledge, and expertise
needed to interpret the clinical and
laboratory findings that would be
necessary to diagnose a medically
determinable impairment.
Response: While we agree that title II
requires that a visual disorder must be
established by evidence from an
‘‘acceptable medical source,’’ the Act
does not define who is an ‘‘acceptable
medical source.’’ Instead, and as we
noted in the NPRM (71 FR at 10458) and
earlier in this preamble, Congress gave
the Commissioner the authority to make
rules and regulations that provide for
‘‘the nature and extent of the proofs and
evidence and the method of taking and
furnishing the same in order to establish
the right to benefits * * *.’’ See
sections 205(a) and 1631(d)(1) of the
Act. Under that authority, we have
determined that, with the exception of
the U.S. Virgin Islands, the licensing
requirements, scope of treatment, and
diagnostic protocols for licensed
optometrists are sufficient to qualify all
licensed optometrists as ‘‘acceptable
medical sources’’ for establishing the
existence of visual disorders for
purposes of our disability programs,
including for purposes of benefits under
title II. We do not agree with these
commenters that we also need evidence
from a physician in these cases.
Comment: One commenter questioned
the differences between the eligibility
requirements for benefits based on
blindness under title XVI and benefits
based on disability under title II and
title XVI. This commenter noted that it
is not necessary to establish the cause of
the blindness in order to receive
benefits based on blindness under title
XVI, but it is necessary to establish the
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
9242
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
cause of any visual loss in order to
receive disability benefits under either
title XVI or title II, including disability
benefits based on blindness under title
II. The commenter indicated that these
differences, as well as the fact that there
is no duration requirement for benefits
based on blindness under title XVI
while there is such a requirement under
title II, penalize individuals who receive
title II disability benefits based on
blindness. The commenter also
recommended that if the title XVI
eligibility requirements are statutory
and cannot be changed, we should
apply them when we determine whether
individuals are disabled based on
blindness under title II.
Response: These rules are required by
the Act. ‘‘Blindness’’ and ‘‘disability’’
are separate categories under title XVI,
whereas under title II blindness is
considered a type of ‘‘disability.’’ The
statutory requirements for eligibility
based on blindness under title XVI are
different from the statutory
requirements for eligibility based on
disability under title II and title XVI. As
a matter of law, we cannot apply the
title XVI eligibility requirements for
statutory blindness to title II claims for
disability.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these rules meet the
requirements for a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 13258.
Thus, they were subject to OMB review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these rules will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will affect only
individuals. Thus, a regulatory
flexibility analysis as provided in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not impose any new or
revised reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on the public.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—
Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social
Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004,
Social Security—Survivors Insurance;
96.006, Supplemental Security Income.)
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
Old-age, Survivors and Disability
Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social Security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security
Income (SSI).
Dated: November 27, 2006.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
Commissioner of Social Security.
§ 416.913 Medical and other evidence of
your impairment(s).
(a) * * *
(3) Licensed optometrists, for
purposes of establishing visual
disorders only (except, in the U.S.
Virgin Islands, licensed optometrists, for
the measurement of visual acuity and
visual fields only). (See paragraph (f) of
this section for the evidence needed for
statutory blindness);
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–3577 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we are amending subpart P of
part 404 and subpart I of part 416 of
chapter III of title 20 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
I
PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950—)
1. The authority citation for subpart P
of part 404 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a), (b), and (d)–
(h), 216(i), 221(a) and (i), 222(c), 223, 225,
and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 402, 405(a), (b), and (d)–(h), 416(i),
421(a) and (i), 422(c), 423, 425, and
902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104–193, 110
Stat. 2105, 2189.
2. Revise § 404.1513(a)(3) to read as
follows:
I
§ 404.1513 Medical and other evidence of
your impairment(s).
(a) * * *
(3) Licensed optometrists, for
purposes of establishing visual
disorders only (except, in the U.S.
Virgin Islands, licensed optometrists, for
the measurement of visual acuity and
visual fields only);
*
*
*
*
*
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Subpart I—[Amended]
3. The authority citation for subpart I
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1611, 1614,
1619, 1631(a), (c), (d)(1), and (p), and 1633
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1382, 1382c, 1382h, 1383(a), (c),
(d)(1), and (p), and 1383(b); secs. 4(c) and 5,
6(c)–(e), 14(a), and 15, Pub. L. 98–460, 98
Stat. 1794, 1801, 1802, and 1808 (42 U.S.C.
421 note, 423 note, 1382h note).
4. Revise § 416.913(a)(3) to read as
follows:
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21 CFR Parts 520 and 522
New Animal Drugs; Maropitant
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
I
PO 00000
Food and Drug Administration
AGENCY:
Subpart P—[Amended]
I
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect
approval of two new animal drug
applications (NADAs) filed by Pfizer,
Inc. The NADAs provide for the
veterinary prescription use of
maropitant citrate tablets and
maropitant citrate injectable solution for
the management of vomiting in dogs.
DATES: This rule is effective March 1,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–110), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–7540, email: melanie.berson@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pfizer,
Inc., 235 East 42d St., New York, NY
10017, filed NADA 141–262 for
CERENIA (maropitant citrate) Tablets.
The NADA provides for the veterinary
prescription use of maropitant citrate
tablets in dogs for the prevention of
acute vomiting and for the prevention of
vomiting due to motion sickness. The
application is approved as of January
29, 2007, and 21 CFR part 520 is
amended by adding new § 520.1315 to
reflect the approval.
Pfizer, Inc., also filed NADA 141–263
for CERENIA (maropitant citrate)
Injectable Solution, used by veterinary
prescription in dogs for the prevention
and treatment of acute vomiting. The
application is approved as of January
29, 2007, and 21 CFR part 522 is
amended by adding new § 522.1315 to
reflect the approval.
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9239-9242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3577]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA-2006-0085]
RIN 0960-AG05
Optometrists as ``Acceptable Medical Sources'' To Establish a
Medically Determinable Impairment
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Final rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising the Social Security and Supplemental Security
Income (SSI) disability regulations regarding sources of evidence for
establishing a medically determinable impairment under titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act). The revised regulations
expand the situations in which we consider licensed optometrists to be
``acceptable medical sources.''
DATES: These rules are effective April 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art Spencer, Director, Office of
Disability Evaluation Policy, Social Security Administration, 4465
Annex Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401,
(410) 966-5766 or TTY (410) 966-5609. For information on eligibility or
filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-
1213, or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet Web site, Social
Security Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is available on the date of
publication in the Federal Register at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html.
What is an ``acceptable medical source?''
Our rules provide that you must show that you have a medically
determinable impairment with evidence from an ``acceptable medical
source.'' An ``acceptable medical source'' is an individual who has the
training and expertise to provide us with the signs and laboratory
findings based on medically acceptable clinical and laboratory
diagnostic techniques that establish a medically determinable physical
or mental impairment. Our regulations identify professionals whom we
consider to be ``acceptable medical sources.'' (See Sec. Sec.
404.1513(a) and 416.913(a).) In our prior rules, these sections
provided that a licensed optometrist was an ``acceptable medical
source,'' but only for the measurement of visual acuity and visual
fields. They further indicated that, for claims under title II, we
might need a report from a physician to determine other aspects of eye
diseases.
Our rules in Sec. Sec. 404.1513(d) and 416.913(d) provide that,
once we have established that you have a medically determinable
impairment, we consider all other relevant evidence from other medical
and non-medical sources, including your own statements, to determine
its severity and how it affects you.
Why are we changing our rules?
In the early 1990s, we discussed expanding the role of optometrists
as ``acceptable medical sources'' with the American Optometric
Association (AOA). However, because licensing requirements and scope of
practice varied considerably among jurisdictions at that time, we found
that it was not feasible for us to revise our policy.
More recently, we again met with representatives of the AOA and
obtained information about the education, qualifications, and State
scope-of-practice requirements related to optometrists. Based on our
review of accreditation and practice requirements, we have determined
that, with the exception of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the licensing
requirements, scope of treatment, and diagnostic protocols for licensed
optometrists are sufficient to qualify all licensed optometrists as
``acceptable medical sources'' for visual disorders. Therefore, it is
now appropriate to revise our regulations to authorize licensed
optometrists to be ``acceptable medical sources'' for visual disorders
in all jurisdictions but the U.S. Virgin Islands.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The U.S. Virgin Islands does not allow optometrists to
administer or prescribe pharmaceuticals, including topical
application of pharmaceuticals for diagnostic or treatment purposes.
Because a complete evaluation of the eye includes the use of
diagnostic pharmaceuticals, optometrists in the U.S. Virgin Islands
are not qualified to perform a complete evaluation of the eye.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The revised regulations expand the situations in which we consider
licensed optometrists to be ``acceptable medical sources.'' These
revised regulations will allow us to make more decisions based on
medical evidence supplied to us solely from optometrists, rather than
having to purchase time-consuming and expensive consultative
examinations with ophthalmologists. Therefore, these regulations will
help some individuals with visual disorders qualify for benefits more
quickly.
[[Page 9240]]
What rules are we revising?
We are revising Sec. Sec. 404.1513(a)(3) and 416.913(a)(3) to
provide that, except in the U.S. Virgin Islands, licensed optometrists
are ``acceptable medical sources'' for purposes of establishing a
medically determinable impairment for visual disorders only. However,
we are maintaining our current rules for licensed optometrists in the
U.S. Virgin Islands, where these individuals will continue to be
``acceptable medical sources'' for measurement of visual acuity and
visual fields only.
What programs do these revised regulations affect?
These revised rules affect disability and blindness determinations
and decisions that we make under titles II and XVI of the Act. In
addition, to the extent that Medicare entitlement and Medicaid
eligibility are based on whether you qualify for disability benefits
under title II or disability or blindness under title XVI, these rules
affect the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Who can get disability benefits?
Under title II of the Act, we provide for the payment of disability
benefits if you are disabled and belong to one of the following three
groups:
Workers insured under the Act,
Children of insured workers, and
Widows, widowers, and surviving divorced spouses (see
Sec. 404.336) of insured workers.
Under title II of the Act, you may qualify for a period of
disability if you are insured for disability under Social Security and
have a disability as defined in section 216(i)(1) of the Act. That
section defines disability to include statutory blindness, for purposes
of establishing a period of disability under title II. If we find that
you are blind and you meet the insured status requirement, we may
establish a period of disability for you regardless of whether you can
do substantial gainful activity (SGA). A period of disability protects
your earnings record under Social Security so that the time you are
disabled will not count against you in determining whether you will
have worked long enough to qualify for benefits and the amount of your
benefits. See Sec. Sec. 404.320, 404.1505, 404.1581, and 404.1582.
Under title XVI of the Act, we provide for SSI payments on the
basis of disability or blindness if you are disabled or blind and have
limited income and resources.
How do we define blindness?
For both the title II and title XVI programs, the Act defines
blindness as ``central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better
eye with the use of a correcting lens. An eye which is accompanied by a
limitation in the fields of vision such that the widest diameter of the
visual field subtends an angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be
considered * * * as having a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less.''
(See sections 216(i)(1) and 1614(a)(2) of the Act.)
Title II of the Act does not provide a separate category of
benefits based on blindness. However, you may be entitled to benefits
based on disability under title II of the Act if you are blind.
By contrast, title XVI of the Act provides for a category of
payments based on blindness as well as a category of payments based on
disability. If you are blind and meet the SSI income and resources
requirements, you may be eligible for SSI payments based on blindness.
Your blindness does not have to meet a 12-month duration requirement
for you to be eligible for these payments. Also, there is no
requirement that you must be unable to do any SGA. However, if you are
working, we will consider your earnings to determine if you are
eligible for SSI payments.
How do we decide whether you are disabled?
If you are applying for disability benefits under title II of the
Act, Sec. 404.1513(a) of our regulations provides that we need
evidence from ``acceptable medical sources'' to establish whether you
have a medically determinable impairment(s). Therefore, in general, to
be entitled to disability benefits under title II, your blindness must
result from a medically determinable impairment and meet the 12-month
duration requirement. (See Sec. Sec. 404.1508, 404.1513, and
404.1581.) Also, if you are under age 55, you must be unable to do any
SGA. (See Sec. Sec. 404.1582 and 404.1584(b).) Even though you are
doing SGA, we may still find that you are entitled to title II
disability benefits if--
You are blind;
You are age 55 or older; and
You are unable to use skills or abilities like the ones
you used in any SGA which you did regularly and for a substantial
period of time. However, we will not pay you any cash benefits for any
month in which you are doing SGA. (See Sec. Sec. 404.1583 and
404.1584(c).)
Section 416.913(a) of our regulations provides that if you are
claiming benefits under title XVI on the basis of disability, not
blindness, your disability must result from a medically determinable
impairment documented by ``acceptable medical sources.'' However,
blindness is treated differently under title XVI of the Act. Under
title XVI, blindness and disability are separate categories of SSI
payments, and the requirements for eligibility based on blindness are
different from the requirements for eligibility based on disability.
Under title XVI, the only evidence we need to establish statutory
blindness is evidence showing that your visual acuity or visual field,
in the better eye, meets the criteria described in Sec. 416.981 of our
regulations, provided that those measurements are consistent with the
other evidence in your case record. We do not need to determine the
cause of your blindness for you to be eligible for SSI payments based
on blindness. Also, as provided in Sec. 416.983, there is no duration
requirement for statutory blindness under title XVI. Section 416.913(f)
provides that if you are applying for benefits under title XVI on the
basis of statutory blindness, we will require an examination by a
physician skilled in diseases of the eye or by an optometrist,
whichever you may select.
What is a ``medically determinable impairment?''
We will not consider you to be disabled or blind unless you furnish
medical and other evidence that we need to show that you are disabled
or blind. (See sections 223(d)(5)(A) and 1614(a)(3)(H)(i) of the Act
and Sec. Sec. 404.1512(a) and 416.912(a) of our regulations.) The Act
requires that you show that your disability results from a medically
determinable physical or mental impairment. A physical or mental
impairment is an impairment that results from anatomical,
physiological, or psychological abnormalities which are demonstrable by
medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques.
(See sections 223(d)(3) and 1614(a)(3)(D) of the Act.) Our regulations
provide that a physical or mental impairment must be established by
medical evidence consisting of signs, symptoms, and laboratory
findings. (See Sec. Sec. 404.1508 and 416.908.)
What is our authority to make rules and set procedures for determining
whether a person is disabled under the statutory definition?
Section 205(a) of the Act and, by reference to section 205(a),
section 1631(d)(1) provide that:
[[Page 9241]]
The Commissioner of Social Security shall have full power and
authority to make rules and regulations and to establish procedures,
not inconsistent with the provisions of this title, which are
necessary or appropriate to carry out such provisions, and shall
adopt reasonable and proper rules and regulations to regulate and
provide for the nature and extent of the proofs and evidence and the
method of taking and furnishing the same in order to establish the
right to benefits hereunder.
What do we mean by ``final rules'' and ``prior rules?''
Even though these rules will not go into effect until 30 days after
publication of this notice, for clarity we refer to the changes we are
making here as the ``final rules'' and to the rules that will be
changed by these final rules as the ``prior rules.''
When will we start to use these final rules?
We will use these rules on their effective date. We will continue
to use our prior rules until the effective date of these final rules.
When the final rules become effective, we will apply them to new
applications filed on or after the effective date of these rules and to
claims pending before us, as we describe below.
As is our usual practice when we make changes to our regulations,
we will apply these final rules on or after their effective date
whenever we make a determination or decision, including in those claims
in which we make a determination or decision after remand to us from a
Federal court. With respect to claims in which we have made a final
decision and that are pending judicial review in Federal court, we
expect that the court's review of the Commissioner's final decision
would be made in accordance with the rules in effect at the time the
final decision of the Commissioner was issued. If a court reverses the
Commissioner's final decision and remands the case for further
administrative proceedings after the effective date of these final
rules, we will apply the provisions of these final rules to the entire
period at issue in the claim in our new decision issued pursuant to the
court's remand.
Public Comments
In the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) we published in the
Federal Register on March 1, 2006 (71 FR 10456), we provided the public
with a 60-day comment period that ended on May 1, 2006.
We received 25 sets of comments. The commenters included medical
organizations, a professional association of individuals who evaluate
and adjudicate Social Security disability claims, optometrists, and
other individuals.
Twenty-three commenters supported the proposed rules. Since these
commenters did not recommend any changes to these rules, we have not
summarized or responded to their comments below. Because some of the
remaining comments were long, we have condensed, summarized, and
paraphrased them below. We have tried to present the commenters' views
adequately and to respond to the issues raised by the commenters that
were within the scope of the rulemaking. We provide our reasons for
adopting or not adopting the recommendations in the summaries of the
comments and our responses below.
Comment: A commenter disagreed with our proposed changes on the
basis that licensed optometrists have less training than
ophthalmologists. This commenter was concerned that the expansion of
the definition of ``acceptable medical sources'' to include licensed
optometrists might not be appropriate.
Response: As we indicated in the NPRM, and as noted above, we
obtained information about the education, qualifications, and States'
scope-of-practice requirements related to optometrists. Based on our
careful review of this information, we have determined that, with the
exception of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the licensing requirements, scope
of treatment, and diagnostic protocols for licensed optometrists are
sufficient to qualify all licensed optometrists as ``acceptable medical
sources'' for establishing the existence of visual disorders under our
disability programs. Therefore, we have determined that it is
appropriate to revise our regulations to make licensed optometrists
``acceptable medical sources'' for establishing visual disorders in all
jurisdictions but the U.S. Virgin Islands.
With this change, we will be able to make more decisions based on
existing medical evidence, without having to purchase time-consuming
and expensive consultative examinations, thereby allowing some
individuals with visual disorders to qualify for benefits more quickly.
While we respect the knowledge, skills, and education of
ophthalmologists, our research shows that optometrists are capable of
providing the evidence, including the signs and laboratory findings,
that we need to establish a medically determinable visual disorder.
Comment: Two commenters disagreed with our proposed changes because
the law and our regulations require that a disability be ``medically
determinable.'' They believed that this meant that we should continue
to require an examination by a treating or consulting ophthalmologist
(M.D. or D.O.) to diagnose and establish the pathology of disorder
causing visual impairment. One of these commenters noted the
differences between the criteria in titles II and XVI and indicated
that in the case of title II disability findings related to blindness,
the evidence must show, and an ``acceptable medical source'' must
agree, that a medical condition caused the claimant's blindness. This
commenter believed that optometrists are not qualified to identify or
evaluate the underlying medical cause of blindness, or to monitor,
treat, and provide prognoses for many eye diseases that could lead to
disabling vision loss or the likely outcomes from those interventions,
because they are not fully knowledgeable of the potential treatments
and lack the medical training, knowledge, and expertise needed to
interpret the clinical and laboratory findings that would be necessary
to diagnose a medically determinable impairment.
Response: While we agree that title II requires that a visual
disorder must be established by evidence from an ``acceptable medical
source,'' the Act does not define who is an ``acceptable medical
source.'' Instead, and as we noted in the NPRM (71 FR at 10458) and
earlier in this preamble, Congress gave the Commissioner the authority
to make rules and regulations that provide for ``the nature and extent
of the proofs and evidence and the method of taking and furnishing the
same in order to establish the right to benefits * * *.'' See sections
205(a) and 1631(d)(1) of the Act. Under that authority, we have
determined that, with the exception of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the
licensing requirements, scope of treatment, and diagnostic protocols
for licensed optometrists are sufficient to qualify all licensed
optometrists as ``acceptable medical sources'' for establishing the
existence of visual disorders for purposes of our disability programs,
including for purposes of benefits under title II. We do not agree with
these commenters that we also need evidence from a physician in these
cases.
Comment: One commenter questioned the differences between the
eligibility requirements for benefits based on blindness under title
XVI and benefits based on disability under title II and title XVI. This
commenter noted that it is not necessary to establish the cause of the
blindness in order to receive benefits based on blindness under title
XVI, but it is necessary to establish the
[[Page 9242]]
cause of any visual loss in order to receive disability benefits under
either title XVI or title II, including disability benefits based on
blindness under title II. The commenter indicated that these
differences, as well as the fact that there is no duration requirement
for benefits based on blindness under title XVI while there is such a
requirement under title II, penalize individuals who receive title II
disability benefits based on blindness. The commenter also recommended
that if the title XVI eligibility requirements are statutory and cannot
be changed, we should apply them when we determine whether individuals
are disabled based on blindness under title II.
Response: These rules are required by the Act. ``Blindness'' and
``disability'' are separate categories under title XVI, whereas under
title II blindness is considered a type of ``disability.'' The
statutory requirements for eligibility based on blindness under title
XVI are different from the statutory requirements for eligibility based
on disability under title II and title XVI. As a matter of law, we
cannot apply the title XVI eligibility requirements for statutory
blindness to title II claims for disability.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and determined that these rules meet the requirements for a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive
Order 13258. Thus, they were subject to OMB review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these rules will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will
affect only individuals. Thus, a regulatory flexibility analysis as
provided in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, is not
required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not impose any new or revised reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on the public.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social
Security--Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security--Retirement
Insurance; 96.004, Social Security--Survivors Insurance; 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income.)
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
Old-age, Survivors and Disability Insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Social Security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Dated: November 27, 2006.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
Commissioner of Social Security.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we are amending subpart P of
part 404 and subpart I of part 416 of chapter III of title 20 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 404--FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE
(1950--)
Subpart P--[Amended]
0
1. The authority citation for subpart P of part 404 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a), (b), and (d)-(h), 216(i), 221(a)
and (i), 222(c), 223, 225, and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 402, 405(a), (b), and (d)-(h), 416(i), 421(a) and (i),
422(c), 423, 425, and 902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104-193, 110
Stat. 2105, 2189.
0
2. Revise Sec. 404.1513(a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1513 Medical and other evidence of your impairment(s).
(a) * * *
(3) Licensed optometrists, for purposes of establishing visual
disorders only (except, in the U.S. Virgin Islands, licensed
optometrists, for the measurement of visual acuity and visual fields
only);
* * * * *
PART 416--SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND
DISABLED
Subpart I--[Amended]
0
3. The authority citation for subpart I of part 416 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1611, 1614, 1619, 1631(a), (c),
(d)(1), and (p), and 1633 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1382, 1382c, 1382h, 1383(a), (c), (d)(1), and (p), and
1383(b); secs. 4(c) and 5, 6(c)-(e), 14(a), and 15, Pub. L. 98-460,
98 Stat. 1794, 1801, 1802, and 1808 (42 U.S.C. 421 note, 423 note,
1382h note).
0
4. Revise Sec. 416.913(a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.913 Medical and other evidence of your impairment(s).
(a) * * *
(3) Licensed optometrists, for purposes of establishing visual
disorders only (except, in the U.S. Virgin Islands, licensed
optometrists, for the measurement of visual acuity and visual fields
only). (See paragraph (f) of this section for the evidence needed for
statutory blindness);
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-3577 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P