Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest and Thunder Basin National Grassland; Wyoming; Thunder Basin Analysis Area Vegetation Management, 9302-9303 [07-919]
Download as PDF
9302
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 40
Thursday, March 1, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest
and Thunder Basin National
Grassland; Wyoming; Thunder Basin
Analysis Area Vegetation Management
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is
analyzing the management of rangeland
vegetation resources, which includes
livestock grazing, on the National Forest
Service (NSF) lands within the Thunder
Basin National Grasslands. NSF lands
that comprise the Thunder Basin
Analysis Area will be assessed to
determine how existing resource
conditions compare to the desired
conditions outlined in the Thunder
Basin National Grassland Land and
Resource Management Plan (LRMP). A
management strategy will be developed
in order to maintain or improve
rangeland and vegetation conditions
toward LRMP desired conditions.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by 30
days from the date of publication in the
Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement (EIS) is
expected July 1, 2007 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected September 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
concerning this notice should be
addressed to Marilee Houtler at 2250 E.
Richards, Douglas, WY 82633.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail
to rocky-mountain-medicine-bow-routtdouglas-thunder-basin@fs.fed.us.
All comments including names and
addressed when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at Douglas
Ranger District, 2250 E. Richards,
Douglas, WY 82633. Visitors are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
encouraged to call ahead to (307) 358–
4690 to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle
Schmitt, Rangeland Management
Specialist or Misty Hays, Deputy
District Ranger, Douglas Ranger District,
at the above address (307) 358–4690.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Vegetation
resources on approximately 351,192
acres of NFS lands, lying within the
Thunder Basis National Grassland
boundaries portions of Campbell,
Converse, and Weston Counties,
Wyoming (Townships 37–44 North,
Ranges 66–72 West) are being analyzed
to determine if and how existing
conditions differ from desired
conditions outlined in the 2001 LRMP.
Vegetation in the Analysis Area is
characteristic of shortgrass prairie, but is
mainly comprised of mixed-grass prairie
species. Johnson and Larson (1999)
describe the Analysis Area as a Big
Sagebrush-Wheatgrass Plains Major
Vegetation Type, dominated by fairly
dense dwarf shrubs, of which most are
Wyoming big sagebrush.
A large portion of the Thunder Basin
Analysis Area evolved under a history
of homesteading in the early twentieth
century, but a prolonged drought period
combined with the economic depression
of the late 1920’s and early 1930’s
caused many of these homesteads to
fail. Starting in 1935, land was
purchased through the Northeastern
Wyoming Land Utilization Project
initiated by the Agricultural Adjustment
Administration, and continued with the
Bankhead Jones Farm Tenant Act of
1937, which was designed to develop a
program of land conservation.
Administration of these lands was
turned over to the Soil Conservation
Service the following year, and
transferred to the United States Forest
Service in 1954.
Today the Thunder Basin National
Grassland supports and provides a
variety of multiple resource uses and
values, which include recreational
opportunities, mineral development,
wildlife habitat, historical and cultural
remnants, as well as domestic livestock
grazing. Livestock ranching operations
in the area depend on National
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Grassland acreage to create logical and
efficient management units. Cattle,
sheep, and horses, in accordance with
10-year term and/or annual temporary
livestock grazing permits, are currently
authorized to graze the allotments
within the Analysis Area.
In order to determine how existing
resource conditions compare to desired
conditions, data collection was
conducted from 2003 to 2006. During
this period, drought conditions
impacted plant vigor, canopy and litter
cover in some parts of the Analysis
Area. Data analysis indicates that seral
stage and structural objectives are
currently not meeting vegetation health
desired conditions within some portions
of the Analysis Area. Other areas of
concern based on data analysis include
enhancing vegetation conditions in
riparian areas and decreasing the
frequency and density of non-native
invasive species within the Analysis
Area.
Purpose and Need for Action
Need: To continue to authorize
livestock grazing and associated
vegetation management actions with
appropriate identified management
options within the Thunder Basin
Analysis Area, and to do so in a manner
that will resolve any disparities between
existing and desired conditions in a
suitable timeframe.
Purpose: To implement vegetation
management objectives in the Thunder
Basin National Grassland Land and
Resource Management Plan with goals
of increasing native forb and perennial
grass diversity, improving riparian area
conditions, improving vegetation health,
and slowing or decreasing the frequency
and density of non-native invasive
species. This analysis will serve as a
guide for implementation of LRMP
vegetation management objectives
aimed at improving vegetation and
riparian area conditions, providing
desired mixes of seral and structural
stages of vegetation, as well as
establishing appropriate monitoring
techniques that will measure the
effectiveness of management activities.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes the
following actions to meet the need and
purpose described above:
—Manage vegetation through an
adaptive management process, which
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
includes authorizing livestock grazing
on allotments within the Thunder
Basin Analysis Area of the Thunder
Basin National Grasslands, that will
meet or move toward desired resource
conditions.
—Define an allotment specific starting
point in which management is
believed to be capable of meeting or
moving toward desired conditions in
a timely manner.
—Monitor to evaluate both
implementation and effectiveness of
management actions.
In all cases, management will use
vegetation management tools that will
meet LRMP Objectives, Standards and
Guidelines, and maintain or move
existing resource conditions toward
Geographic Area desired conditions. If
monitoring indicates that practices are
being properly implemented and that
resource trends are moving toward
meeting desired conditions in a timely
manner, management may continue. If
monitoring indicates that there is a need
to modify management practices,
adaptive options as analyzed in the EIS
will be selected and implemented.
Possible Alternatives
(1) No action.
(2) Continued current management.
Responsible Official
Robert M. Sprentall, District Ranger,
Douglas Ranger District, 2250 East
Richards Street, Douglas, Wyoming
82633, is the official responsible for
making the decision on this action. He
will document his decision and rational
in a Record of Decision.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will consider
the results of the analysis and its
findings and then document the final
decision in a Record of Decision (ROD).
The decision will determine whether or
not to authorize livestock grazing on all,
part, or none of the allotments within
the Thunder Basin analysis Area, and if
so, what adaptive management design
criteria, adaptive options, and
monitoring will be implemented so as to
meet or move toward the desired
conditions in the defined timeframe.
Scoping Process
The Forest Service has publicly
scoped the proposed action in August
2006 as the Thunder Basin Analysis
Area Vegetation Management
Environmental Assessment. Individuals
who submitted comments on this
scoping will still have standing. These
comments have been reviewed and are
being considered as the analysis
continues.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
Preliminary Issues
The Forest Service has identified the
following preliminary issues: (1)
Current impacts to soil resources from
the continuing drought, and livestock
and wildlife grazing/browsing; (2)
Potential impacts to livestock grazing
permits on National Grasslands.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the draft environmental
impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft EIS will
be prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
statement will be 45 days from the date
the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. While public
participation is strictly optional at this
stage, the Forest Service believes that it
is important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the subsequent
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is
very important that those interested in
this proposed action participate by the
close of the 45 day draft environmental
impact statement comment period so
that comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement. To
assist the Forest Service in identifying
and considering issues and concerns on
the proposed action, comments on the
draft environmental impact statement
should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft
statement. Comments also may address
the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9303
the statement. In addressing these
points, reviewers may wish to refer to
the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations which implement the
procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 40 CFR
1503.3.
Dated: February 21, 2007.
Misty A. Hays,
Deputy District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 07–919 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Intergovernmental Advisory
Committee Meeting, Northwest Forest
Plan
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental
Advisory Committee (IAC), Northwest
Forest Plan (NWFP), has scheduled a
meeting on March 20, 2007 from 8 a.m.
to 12 noon. at the DoubleTree Hotel &
Executive Meeting Center, 1000 NE
Multnomah, Portland, Oregon 97232,
(503) 281–6111, in the Multnomah
Conference room. We will provide
participants with updates on several
ongoing projects of interest including
monitoring, agency plan revisions,
research activities, etc.
The meeting is open to the public and
fully accessible for people with
disabilities. A 10-minute time slot is
reserved for public comments at 8:10
a.m. Interpreters are available upon
request at least 10 days prior to the
meeting. Written comments may be
submitted for the meeting record.
Interested persons are encouraged to
attend.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this meeting may
be directed to Kath Collier, Management
Analyst, Regional Ecosystem Office, 333
SW. First Avenue, P.O. Box 3623,
Portland, OR 97208 (telephone: 503–
808–2165).
Dated: February 20, 2007.
Anne Badgley,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. E7–3564 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9302-9303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-919]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 9302]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest and Thunder Basin National
Grassland; Wyoming; Thunder Basin Analysis Area Vegetation Management
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is analyzing the management of rangeland
vegetation resources, which includes livestock grazing, on the National
Forest Service (NSF) lands within the Thunder Basin National
Grasslands. NSF lands that comprise the Thunder Basin Analysis Area
will be assessed to determine how existing resource conditions compare
to the desired conditions outlined in the Thunder Basin National
Grassland Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). A management
strategy will be developed in order to maintain or improve rangeland
and vegetation conditions toward LRMP desired conditions.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. The
draft environmental impact statement (EIS) is expected July 1, 2007 and
the final environmental impact statement is expected September 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments concerning this notice should be addressed
to Marilee Houtler at 2250 E. Richards, Douglas, WY 82633. Comments may
also be sent via e-mail to rocky-mountain-medicine-bow-routt-douglas-
thunder-basin@fs.fed.us.
All comments including names and addressed when provided, are
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Douglas Ranger
District, 2250 E. Richards, Douglas, WY 82633. Visitors are encouraged
to call ahead to (307) 358-4690 to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Schmitt, Rangeland Management
Specialist or Misty Hays, Deputy District Ranger, Douglas Ranger
District, at the above address (307) 358-4690.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Vegetation resources on approximately
351,192 acres of NFS lands, lying within the Thunder Basis National
Grassland boundaries portions of Campbell, Converse, and Weston
Counties, Wyoming (Townships 37-44 North, Ranges 66-72 West) are being
analyzed to determine if and how existing conditions differ from
desired conditions outlined in the 2001 LRMP. Vegetation in the
Analysis Area is characteristic of shortgrass prairie, but is mainly
comprised of mixed-grass prairie species. Johnson and Larson (1999)
describe the Analysis Area as a Big Sagebrush-Wheatgrass Plains Major
Vegetation Type, dominated by fairly dense dwarf shrubs, of which most
are Wyoming big sagebrush.
A large portion of the Thunder Basin Analysis Area evolved under a
history of homesteading in the early twentieth century, but a prolonged
drought period combined with the economic depression of the late 1920's
and early 1930's caused many of these homesteads to fail. Starting in
1935, land was purchased through the Northeastern Wyoming Land
Utilization Project initiated by the Agricultural Adjustment
Administration, and continued with the Bankhead Jones Farm Tenant Act
of 1937, which was designed to develop a program of land conservation.
Administration of these lands was turned over to the Soil Conservation
Service the following year, and transferred to the United States Forest
Service in 1954.
Today the Thunder Basin National Grassland supports and provides a
variety of multiple resource uses and values, which include
recreational opportunities, mineral development, wildlife habitat,
historical and cultural remnants, as well as domestic livestock
grazing. Livestock ranching operations in the area depend on National
Grassland acreage to create logical and efficient management units.
Cattle, sheep, and horses, in accordance with 10-year term and/or
annual temporary livestock grazing permits, are currently authorized to
graze the allotments within the Analysis Area.
In order to determine how existing resource conditions compare to
desired conditions, data collection was conducted from 2003 to 2006.
During this period, drought conditions impacted plant vigor, canopy and
litter cover in some parts of the Analysis Area. Data analysis
indicates that seral stage and structural objectives are currently not
meeting vegetation health desired conditions within some portions of
the Analysis Area. Other areas of concern based on data analysis
include enhancing vegetation conditions in riparian areas and
decreasing the frequency and density of non-native invasive species
within the Analysis Area.
Purpose and Need for Action
Need: To continue to authorize livestock grazing and associated
vegetation management actions with appropriate identified management
options within the Thunder Basin Analysis Area, and to do so in a
manner that will resolve any disparities between existing and desired
conditions in a suitable timeframe.
Purpose: To implement vegetation management objectives in the
Thunder Basin National Grassland Land and Resource Management Plan with
goals of increasing native forb and perennial grass diversity,
improving riparian area conditions, improving vegetation health, and
slowing or decreasing the frequency and density of non-native invasive
species. This analysis will serve as a guide for implementation of LRMP
vegetation management objectives aimed at improving vegetation and
riparian area conditions, providing desired mixes of seral and
structural stages of vegetation, as well as establishing appropriate
monitoring techniques that will measure the effectiveness of management
activities.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes the following actions to meet the need
and purpose described above:
--Manage vegetation through an adaptive management process, which
[[Page 9303]]
includes authorizing livestock grazing on allotments within the Thunder
Basin Analysis Area of the Thunder Basin National Grasslands, that will
meet or move toward desired resource conditions.
--Define an allotment specific starting point in which management is
believed to be capable of meeting or moving toward desired conditions
in a timely manner.
--Monitor to evaluate both implementation and effectiveness of
management actions.
In all cases, management will use vegetation management tools that
will meet LRMP Objectives, Standards and Guidelines, and maintain or
move existing resource conditions toward Geographic Area desired
conditions. If monitoring indicates that practices are being properly
implemented and that resource trends are moving toward meeting desired
conditions in a timely manner, management may continue. If monitoring
indicates that there is a need to modify management practices, adaptive
options as analyzed in the EIS will be selected and implemented.
Possible Alternatives
(1) No action.
(2) Continued current management.
Responsible Official
Robert M. Sprentall, District Ranger, Douglas Ranger District, 2250
East Richards Street, Douglas, Wyoming 82633, is the official
responsible for making the decision on this action. He will document
his decision and rational in a Record of Decision.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will consider the results of the analysis
and its findings and then document the final decision in a Record of
Decision (ROD). The decision will determine whether or not to authorize
livestock grazing on all, part, or none of the allotments within the
Thunder Basin analysis Area, and if so, what adaptive management design
criteria, adaptive options, and monitoring will be implemented so as to
meet or move toward the desired conditions in the defined timeframe.
Scoping Process
The Forest Service has publicly scoped the proposed action in
August 2006 as the Thunder Basin Analysis Area Vegetation Management
Environmental Assessment. Individuals who submitted comments on this
scoping will still have standing. These comments have been reviewed and
are being considered as the analysis continues.
Preliminary Issues
The Forest Service has identified the following preliminary issues:
(1) Current impacts to soil resources from the continuing drought, and
livestock and wildlife grazing/browsing; (2) Potential impacts to
livestock grazing permits on National Grasslands.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the draft environmental impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft EIS will be prepared for comment. The
comment period on the draft environmental statement will be 45 days
from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice
of availability in the Federal Register. While public participation is
strictly optional at this stage, the Forest Service believes that it is
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the subsequent environmental review process.
First, reviewers of draft statements must structure their participation
in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful
and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 (1978).
Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until
after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45
day draft environmental impact statement comment period so that
comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a
time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the
final environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific
pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments also may address the
adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of
the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. In
addressing these points, reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations which implement the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 40 CFR 1503.3.
Dated: February 21, 2007.
Misty A. Hays,
Deputy District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 07-919 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M