Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to an Amendment to the Options Marketing Fee, 9050-9051 [E7-3408]
Download as PDF
9050
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 28, 2007 / Notices
notify OPM when any such waiver is
terminated.
[FR Doc. E7–3454 Filed 2–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–43–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55328; File No. SR–Amex–
2007–16]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change as
Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto
Relating to an Amendment to the
Options Marketing Fee
February 21, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
2, 2007, the American Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. On February 14, 2007, the
Amex submitted Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change. Amex has
designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by Amex under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to decrease
the equity options marketing fee from
the current level of $0.75 to $0.35 per
contract for those equity, exchange
traded fund share, and trust issued
receipt options series that quote and
trade in one cent increments under the
penny pilot program. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and www.amex.com.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 Feb 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change, and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. Amex
has substantially prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The proposal seeks to reduce the
current fee of $0.75 per contract to $0.35
per contract for those equity, exchange
traded fund share, and trust issued
receipt options series that quote and
trade in one cent increments under the
penny pilot program. In February, 2006,
the Exchange increased its equity
options marketing fee from $0.40 per
contract on the transactions of
specialists and registered options
traders (‘‘ROTs’’) in equity options to
$0.75 per contract (except for SPDR
options which will continue to remain
subject to the current fee level of $1.00
per contract 5).6
Currently, the equity options
marketing fee is assessed on
electronically executed customer orders
from firms that accept payment for
directing their orders to the Exchange
(‘‘payment accepting firms’’) with whom
a specialist has negotiated a payment for
order flow arrangement.
The Exchange has no role with
respect to the negotiations between
specialists and payment accepting firms.
The Exchange collects and administers
the payment of the fee collected on
those transactions for which the
specialist has advised the Exchange that
it has negotiated with a payment
accepting firm to pay for the firm’s order
flow. Included in this general
administrative support, the Exchange
tracks the number of qualified orders
sent by a payment accepting firm, bills
specialists and ROTs through their
clearing firms, and issues payments to
payment accepting firms to reflect the
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51685
(May 11, 2005), 70 FR 28587 (May 18, 2005) (SR–
Amex–2005–050).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53341
(February 21, 2006), 71 FR 10085 (February 28,
2006) (SR–Amex–2006–15).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection and payment of the marketing
fee. The Exchange rebates to specialists
and ROTs, on a quarterly basis, the
amount of marketing fees collected that
have not been paid to order flow
providers.
The specialists are solely responsible,
but are not required, to negotiate
payment for order flow agreements with
payment accepting firms and are
responsible for any arrangements made
with the payment accepting firms. The
specialists will use the funds that are
collected from a particular post on the
Exchange to market for those specific
products traded at that particular post
on the Exchange. Additionally,
supplemental registered options traders
have the ability to enter into payment
for order flow agreements with affiliated
firms. So long as it is within the above
described parameters, the specific terms
governing the orders that qualify for
payment and the amount of any
payments are determined by the
specialists in their discretion.
The Exchange asserts that the
proposal is equitable, as required by
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.7 In
connection with the revision to the said
options marketing fee, the Exchange
notes that decreasing the fee in the
delineated circumstances from $0.75 to
$0.35 per contract is reasonable given
the competitive pressure to attract
options order flow. Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that the proposal is
an equitable allocation of reasonable
fees among Exchange members.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act 8 in general, and
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 9 in particular,
in that it is designed to provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among exchange
members and issuers and other persons
using exchange facilities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
7 Section 6(b)(4) of the Act states that the rules of
a national securities exchange should provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees,
and other charges among its members and issuers
and other persons using its facilities. 15 U.S.C.
78f(b)(4).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 28, 2007 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change
has been designated as a fee change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 11
thereunder, because it establishes or
changes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange. Accordingly,
the proposal will take effect upon filing
with the Commission. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.12
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2007–16 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2007–16. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
12 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change, the Commission
considers the period to commence on February 14,
2007, the date on which the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1.
11 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 Feb 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2007–16 and should
be submitted on or before March 21,
2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–3408 Filed 2–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55329; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2007–008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Clarify
Opening Process for Nasdaq Market
Center
February 21, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
12, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
substantially by Nasdaq. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9051
Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4
which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission.5 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq is proposing to modify Rule
4752 to clarify that in the Nasdaq
Market Center (‘‘System’’), securities
listed on the New York and American
Stock Exchanges, which are not subject
to an opening cross, open for the premarket session in the same manner as
Nasdaq-listed securities. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at
Nasdaq, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and https://
www.nasdaq.complinet.com/nasdaq/
display/.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Nasdaq included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq is proposing to modify Rule
4752 to clarify that in the Nasdaq
Market Center (‘‘System’’), securities
listed on the New York and American
Stock Exchanges, which are not subject
to an opening cross, open for the premarket session in the same manner as
Nasdaq-listed securities. Specifically, at
7 a.m., the System adds to the Nasdaq
book in time priority all eligible orders
in accordance with each order’s defined
characteristics. At 9:25 a.m., the System
opens all remaining unopened Quotes
in accordance with each firm’s
instructions. As with Nasdaq securities,
market participants quoting in NYSE/
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 Nasdaq has requested that the Commission
waive the 5-day written notice of intention to file
the proposed rule change. In addition, Nasdaq has
asked the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay. See Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 17 CFR
240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
4 17
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9050-9051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3408]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55328; File No. SR-Amex-2007-16]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to an Amendment to the
Options Marketing Fee
February 21, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 2, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. On February 14, 2007, the Amex submitted Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change. Amex has designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by Amex
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to decrease the equity options marketing fee
from the current level of $0.75 to $0.35 per contract for those equity,
exchange traded fund share, and trust issued receipt options series
that quote and trade in one cent increments under the penny pilot
program. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and www.amex.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Amex has substantially prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The proposal seeks to reduce the current fee of $0.75 per contract
to $0.35 per contract for those equity, exchange traded fund share, and
trust issued receipt options series that quote and trade in one cent
increments under the penny pilot program. In February, 2006, the
Exchange increased its equity options marketing fee from $0.40 per
contract on the transactions of specialists and registered options
traders (``ROTs'') in equity options to $0.75 per contract (except for
SPDR options which will continue to remain subject to the current fee
level of $1.00 per contract \5\).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51685 (May 11,
2005), 70 FR 28587 (May 18, 2005) (SR-Amex-2005-050).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53341 (February 21,
2006), 71 FR 10085 (February 28, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the equity options marketing fee is assessed on
electronically executed customer orders from firms that accept payment
for directing their orders to the Exchange (``payment accepting
firms'') with whom a specialist has negotiated a payment for order flow
arrangement.
The Exchange has no role with respect to the negotiations between
specialists and payment accepting firms. The Exchange collects and
administers the payment of the fee collected on those transactions for
which the specialist has advised the Exchange that it has negotiated
with a payment accepting firm to pay for the firm's order flow.
Included in this general administrative support, the Exchange tracks
the number of qualified orders sent by a payment accepting firm, bills
specialists and ROTs through their clearing firms, and issues payments
to payment accepting firms to reflect the collection and payment of the
marketing fee. The Exchange rebates to specialists and ROTs, on a
quarterly basis, the amount of marketing fees collected that have not
been paid to order flow providers.
The specialists are solely responsible, but are not required, to
negotiate payment for order flow agreements with payment accepting
firms and are responsible for any arrangements made with the payment
accepting firms. The specialists will use the funds that are collected
from a particular post on the Exchange to market for those specific
products traded at that particular post on the Exchange. Additionally,
supplemental registered options traders have the ability to enter into
payment for order flow agreements with affiliated firms. So long as it
is within the above described parameters, the specific terms governing
the orders that qualify for payment and the amount of any payments are
determined by the specialists in their discretion.
The Exchange asserts that the proposal is equitable, as required by
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.\7\ In connection with the revision to the
said options marketing fee, the Exchange notes that decreasing the fee
in the delineated circumstances from $0.75 to $0.35 per contract is
reasonable given the competitive pressure to attract options order
flow. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposal is an
equitable allocation of reasonable fees among Exchange members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Section 6(b)(4) of the Act states that the rules of a
national securities exchange should provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members and issuers and other persons using its facilities. 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act \9\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
exchange members and issuers and other persons using exchange
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
[[Page 9051]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has been designated as a fee
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(2) \11\ thereunder, because it establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal
will take effect upon filing with the Commission. At any time within 60
days of the filing of such proposed rule change the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
\12\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change, the
Commission considers the period to commence on February 14, 2007,
the date on which the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2007-16 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2007-16. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of Amex. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-Amex-2007-16 and should be submitted on or before March 21, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3408 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P