International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Restrictions for 2007 Purse Seine and Longline Fisheries in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean, 8333-8335 [E7-3251]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(WVDEP), Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE, Charleston, West
Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rosemarie Nino, (215) 814–3377, or by
e-mail at nino.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, with the same title, that is
located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register
publication.
Dated: February 16, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 07–846 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 070215036–7036–01; I.D.
012307A]
RIN 0648–AU79
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna
Fisheries; Restrictions for 2007 Purse
Seine and Longline Fisheries in the
Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes management
measures to reduce overfishing of the
eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (ETP)
tuna stocks in 2007, consistent with
recommendations by the Inter-American
Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) that
have been approved by the Department
of State (DOS) under the Tuna
Conventions Act. The purse seine
fishery for tuna in the Convention Area
would be closed for a 6–week period
either beginning August 1, 2007,
through September 11, 2007, or
November 20, 2007, through December
31, 2007. This proposed rule would also
close the U.S. longline fishery in the
Convention Area in 2007 once the catch
of bigeye tuna harvested with longline
gear in the Convention Area reaches 500
metric tons (mt). This action is taken to
limit fishing mortality caused by purse
seine fishing and longline fishing in the
Convention Area and contribute to longterm conservation of the tuna stocks at
levels that support healthy fisheries.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
Comments must be received by
March 28, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed
rule or the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) should be sent to
Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Boulevard,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802 or by
email to the Southwest Region at 0648–
AU79@noaa.gov. Comments may also be
submitted by email through the Federal
e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Include in the
subject line of the e-mail comment the
following document identifier: 0648–
AU79. Comments also may be submitted
by fax to (562) 980–4047. Copies of the
initial regulatory impact review/IRFA
may be obtained from the Southwest
Regional Administrator, Southwest
Region, NMFS, 501 W. Ocean Blvd.,
Long Beach, CA 90902–4213.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.
Allison Routt, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Southwest Region, NMFS,
(562) 980–4030.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is also accessible
via the Internet at the Office of the
Federal Register’s website at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
The United States is a member of the
IATTC, which was established under
the Convention for the Establishment of
an Inter-American Tropical Tuna
Commission signed in 1949
(Convention). The IATTC was
established to provide an international
arrangement to ensure the effective
international conservation and
management of highly migratory species
of fish in the Convention Area. For the
purposes of this closure, the Convention
Area is defined to include the waters
bounded by the coast of the Americas,
the 40° N. and 40° S. parallels, and the
150° W. meridian. The IATTC has
maintained a scientific research and
fishery monitoring program for many
years and annually assesses the status of
stocks of tuna and the fisheries to
determine appropriate harvest limits or
other measures to prevent
overexploitation of the stocks and
promote viable fisheries.
Under the Tuna Conventions Act, 16
U.S.C. 951–961 and 971 et seq., NMFS
must publish proposed rules to carry
out IATTC recommendations that have
been approved by DOS. The Southwest
Regional Administrator also is required
by 50 CFR 300.25(b)(3) to issue a direct
notice to the owners or agents of all U.S.
purse seine vessels that operate in the
ETP of fishery management actions
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8333
applicable to them that have been
recommended by the IATTC and
approved by the DOS.
In June 2006, the IATTC adopted a
Resolution for a Program on the
Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean for 2007. The June 2006
resolution is a 1–year program on the
conservation of tuna in the eastern
Pacific Ocean for 2007. This resolution
offers a choice for closing the purse
seine fishery: either a 6–week closure
beginning August 1, 2007, or a 6–week
closure beginning November 20, 2007.
The resolution of June 2006
incorporated flexibility for nations to
administer the purse seine closure in
accordance with national legislation and
national sovereignty. The selected
measure should reduce overfishing in a
manner that is fair, equitable, and
readily enforceable. NMFS will select
one of the two closure periods after
consideration of public comment.
The June 2006 resolution also calls
upon each Party and cooperating nonParty to ensure that each nation’s
longline catch of bigeye tuna in the ETP
during 2007 will not exceed the catch
level of 2001 or 500 mt, whichever is
higher. The U.S. catch level of longline
caught bigeye tuna for 2001 was
estimated to be 150 mt in the
Convention Area. Therefore, under this
rule, the U.S. quota for longline caught
bigeye in the Convention Area would be
500 mt for 2007.
In 2006, the U.S. catch level of
longline-caught bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area of 150 mt was reached.
On July 6, 2006, NMFS closed the U.S.
longline fishery for bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area for the remainder of
2006.
The IATTC adopted the June 2006
resolution after considering a variety of
measures, including the use of quotas
and closures (as in 1999 through 2002),
a full-month purse seine closure (used
in 2003), and a 6–week purse seine
closure as used in 2004, 2005, and 2006.
The proposed 2007 time/area closure
is based on 2005 assessments of the
condition of the tuna stocks in the ETP
and historic catch and effort data for
different portions of the ETP, as well as
records relating to implementation of
quotas and closures in prior years. The
closure targets the Convention Area and
is believed to be sufficient to reduce the
risk of overfishing of the tuna stocks,
especially when considered in
combination with the 6–week closures
implemented in 2004, 2005, and 2006.
The combined multi-annual,
multilateral restrictions should increase
the protections from overfishing of the
tuna stocks in the Convention Area. In
an international fishery the best
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
8334
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
approach is through multilateral
conservation and management
measures. The IATTC met in June 2006
and reviewed tuna stock assessments
and fishery information and considered
that new information in evaluating the
need for management measures for 2007
and future years. The DOS has approved
the June 2006 resolution covering the
year 2007, including the management
measures described above.
On October 30, 2006, the Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region, sent a
notice to owners and agents of U.S.
fishing vessels of the June 2006
resolution adopted by the IATTC and
approved by the DOS.
Classification
This action is proposed under the
regulations for the Pacific Tuna
Fisheries at 50 CFR 300.25.
On December 8, 1999, NMFS
prepared a biological opinion (BO)
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA), 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., assessing
the impacts of the fisheries as they
would operate under the interim final
rule (65 FR 47, January 3, 2000)
implementing the International Dolphin
Conservation Program Act (IDCPA). For
the final rule (69 FR 176, September 13,
2004) to implement the IDCPA, NMFS
amended the incidental take statement
included in the December 8, 1999, BO.
NMFS concluded that the fishing
activities conducted under those
regulations are not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any
endangered or threatened species under
the jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat. This proposed rule will
not result in any changes in the fisheries
such that there would be impacts
beyond those considered in that BO.
The IATTC has also taken action to
reduce sea turtle injury and mortality
from interactions in the purse seine
fishery so impacts of the fisheries
should be lower than in the past.
Because this closure does not alter the
scope of the fishery management regime
analyzed in the IDCPA rule, or the scope
of the impacts considered in that
consultation, NMFS is relying on that
analysis to conclude that the purse seine
fishery managed under this proposed
rule will not likely adversely effect any
endangered or threatened species under
the jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat. On October 4, 2005,
NMFS concluded that the Hawaii-based
pelagic, deep-set, tuna longline fishery
managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for the Pelagic
Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region
is not likely to jeopardize the continued
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
existence of any endangered or
threatened species under the
jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat. This proposed rule will
not result in any changes in the longline
fishery such that there would be
impacts beyond those considered in that
BO.
The U.S. ETP tuna purse seine
fisheries occasionally interact with a
variety of species of dolphin, and
dolphin takes are authorized and
managed under the IDCPA. The
conservation management measures in
this proposed rule do not affect the
administration of that program, which is
consistent with section 303(a)(2) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16
U.S.C. 1413 (a)(2).
NMFS prepared an EA for the final
rule (70 FR 69, April 12, 2005) to
implement resolutions adopted by the
IATTC and by the Parties to the
Agreement on the International Dolphin
Conservation Program. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries concluded
that there would be no significant
impact on the human environment as a
result of that final rule. The impacts of
the fisheries as they will operate under
the closures in 2007 are within the
range of impacts of the alternatives
considered in that EA, and are not
expected to pose different impacts to the
human environment. Therefore, this
action does not require further analysis
under NEPA.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared, as required by
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA). The IRFA prepared describes
the economic impact that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would have on small
entities. A copy of the IRFA for this
proposed rule is available for public
comment (see ADDRESSES). A summary
of the analysis follows.
A description of the reasons for,
objectives of, and legal basis for this
proposed rule is included in the
preamble and not repeated here.
This action would prohibit the use of
purse seine gear to harvest tuna in the
Convention Area for a 6- week period
beginning August 1, 2007, through
September 11, 2007, or beginning
November 20, 2007, through December
31, 2007, and limit the annual 2007 U.S.
catch of bigeye tuna caught by longline
in the ETP to 500 mt.
The proposed purse seine closure
would apply to the U.S. tuna purse
seine fleet, which consists of five to ten
small vessels (carrying capacity below
400 short tons (363 mt)) and one to two
large vessels (carrying capacity 400
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
short tons (363 mt) or greater). The large
vessels usually fish outside U.S. waters
and deliver their catch to foreign ports
or transship to processors outside the
mainland United States. The large
vessels are categorized as large business
entities (revenues in excess of $4
million per year). A large purse seine
vessel typically generates 4,000 to 5,000
mt of tuna valued at between $4 and $5
million per year. The closure should not
significantly affect the operations of the
one to two large vessels because they are
capable of fishing in other areas that
would remain open. Also, the one to
two large purse seine vessels do conduct
fishing operation in other areas. The
small vessels are categorized as small
business entities (revenues below $4
million per year). They fish out of
California in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) most of the year
for small pelagic fish (Pacific sardine,
Pacific mackerel) and for market squid
in summer. Some small vessels harvest
tuna seasonally when they are available.
The proposed time/area closure will
have no effect on small vessels because
they do not have the endurance and
markets to fish that far south for tunas
on a regular basis.
For 2006, the United States chose to
close the purse seine fishery beginning
November 20, 2006, for the remainder of
2006. In 2006 the U.S. catch level of
longline caught bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area of 150 mt was reached.
On July 6, 2006, NMFS closed the U.S.
longline fishery for bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area for the remainder of
2006.
The existing California based longline
fishery, currently consisting of one
vessel, does catch bigeye tuna. The
portion of the fleet operating out of
Hawaii has generally operated outside
the boundaries of the Convention Area,
and has not made significant catches in
those waters. In 2004, 2005, and 2006,
the California and Hawaii based
longline fishery was limited to 150
metric tons of bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area. A closure for the
California based longline fleet will
significantly affect their operations.
However, the California based longline
fleet is capable of fishing for other
species of fish in the Convention Area
which should mitigate the effects of the
closure. In 2004, 2005, and 2006, the
California based longline fleet landed
swordfish and showed fishery
management that they were capable of
fishing for other species of fish in the
Convention Area. With the reopening of
the swordfish fishery for the Hawaii
fleet, effort directed at bigeye tuna
(which has mainly occurred west of the
Convention Area) should remain at the
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
same level. A closure should not
significantly affect their operations as
they are capable of fishing in other areas
that would remain open, outside the
boundaries of the Convention Area. In
2005, 500 mt of bigeye tuna were caught
by the U.S. longline fishery in the
Convention Area. In 2007, if the U.S.
longline fishery reaches the 500 metric
ton limit, this fishery is capable of
fishing in other areas that would remain
open.
NMFS is not aware of any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule. This
rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements, and the
compliance requirements for the closure
areas are as described at the outset of
this summary.
NMFS considered three alternatives
for this proposed rule: The 2006 IATTC
Tuna Conservation Resolution allows
nations to opt for a 6–week summer
closure of the purse seine fishery from
August 1 through September 20 of 2007
or a closure from November 20 through
December 31, 2007. The August 1
September 20 closure alternative may
have a greater economic impact on
small entities than the November 20
December 31 closure. In particular, the
U.S. purse seine fleet may prefer a
closure later in the fishing year because
the winter weather is not conducive to
fishing. Also, throughout the history of
this fishery shipyards have been
prepared to accept vessels for scheduled
repairs during the winter months. The
fishery closure later in the year allows
the industry to plan for and mitigate
economic impacts of a closure while
still providing the conservation benefits
to the tuna resources in the ETP.
NMFS also considered the alternative
of not implementing the 2006 IATTC
Tuna Conservation Resolution. This
alternative would have imposed no
economic costs on small entities.
However, failure to implement measures
that have been agreed on pursuant to the
Convention would violate the United
States’ obligations under the
Convention, and would violate the Tuna
Conventions Act.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951–961 and 971 et
seq.
Dated: February 21, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3251 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[I.D. 021607G]
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council; Public Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Council) will
convene the Law Enforcement Advisory
Panel (LEAP) to review a revised Draft
Joint Amendment 27 to the Reef Fish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP)/
Amendment 14 to the Shrimp FMP.
This amendment contains alternatives
to regulate the harvest and bycatch of
red snapper by both the directed
commercial and recreational fisheries
and the shrimp fishery in the Gulf of
Mexico. The need for this amendment
arose from the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process through which a recent stock
assessment showed that the red snapper
stock in the Gulf was overfished and
overfishing was continuing.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 from 1 p.m. to
5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Beau Rivage Resort and Casino, 875
Beach Boulevard, Biloxi, Mississippi,
888–383–7037.
Council address: Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council, 2203
North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa,
Florida 33607.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Richard Leard, Deputy Executive
Director, Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council; telephone: 813–
348–1630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The LEAP
will review a scoping document for a
potential amendment to address the
need for additional management
measures for gray triggerfish, greater
amberjack, gag, and red grouper. The
LEAP will discuss enforcement
implications of the potential
implementation of a fish-tagging
program for stocks managed under
individual fishing quotas (IFQs) such as
red snapper and the potential use of a
Federal fish stamp to identify
recreational fishermen fishing in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Finally,
the LEAP will discuss any enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8335
problems and successes of the recently
implemented IFQ program for red
snapper and review the status of various
FMP amendments and other regulatory
actions previously approved by the
Council.
The LEAP consists of principal law
enforcement officers in each of the Gulf
States, as well as the NMFS, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), the U.S.
Coast Guard, and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration’s
(NOAA) General Counsel. A copy of the
agenda and related materials can be
obtained by calling the Council office at
813–348–1630.
Although other non-emergency issues
not on the agendas may come before the
LEAP for discussion, in accordance with
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA), those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Actions of the LEAP will be
restricted to those issues specifically
identified in the agendas and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
Section 305(c) of the M-SFCMA,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take action to
address the emergency.
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Tina Trezza at the
Council (see ADDRESSES) five working
days prior to the meeting.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3244 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[I.D. 012607A]
RIN 0648–AU26
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery;
Amendment 12 to the Coastal Pelagic
Species Fishery Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8333-8335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3251]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 070215036-7036-01; I.D. 012307A]
RIN 0648-AU79
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Restrictions for
2007 Purse Seine and Longline Fisheries in the Eastern Tropical Pacific
Ocean
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes management measures to reduce overfishing of the
eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (ETP) tuna stocks in 2007, consistent
with recommendations by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
(IATTC) that have been approved by the Department of State (DOS) under
the Tuna Conventions Act. The purse seine fishery for tuna in the
Convention Area would be closed for a 6-week period either beginning
August 1, 2007, through September 11, 2007, or November 20, 2007,
through December 31, 2007. This proposed rule would also close the U.S.
longline fishery in the Convention Area in 2007 once the catch of
bigeye tuna harvested with longline gear in the Convention Area reaches
500 metric tons (mt). This action is taken to limit fishing mortality
caused by purse seine fishing and longline fishing in the Convention
Area and contribute to long-term conservation of the tuna stocks at
levels that support healthy fisheries.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 28, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed rule or the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) should be sent to Rodney R. McInnis,
Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean
Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802 or by email to the
Southwest Region at 0648-AU79@noaa.gov. Comments may also be submitted
by email through the Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Include in the subject line of the e-mail comment
the following document identifier: 0648-AU79. Comments also may be
submitted by fax to (562) 980-4047. Copies of the initial regulatory
impact review/IRFA may be obtained from the Southwest Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Long Beach,
CA 90902-4213.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Allison Routt, Sustainable
Fisheries Division, Southwest Region, NMFS, (562) 980-4030.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is also accessible via the Internet at the
Office of the Federal Register's website at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
fr/.
The United States is a member of the IATTC, which was established
under the Convention for the Establishment of an Inter-American
Tropical Tuna Commission signed in 1949 (Convention). The IATTC was
established to provide an international arrangement to ensure the
effective international conservation and management of highly migratory
species of fish in the Convention Area. For the purposes of this
closure, the Convention Area is defined to include the waters bounded
by the coast of the Americas, the 40[deg] N. and 40[deg] S. parallels,
and the 150[deg] W. meridian. The IATTC has maintained a scientific
research and fishery monitoring program for many years and annually
assesses the status of stocks of tuna and the fisheries to determine
appropriate harvest limits or other measures to prevent
overexploitation of the stocks and promote viable fisheries.
Under the Tuna Conventions Act, 16 U.S.C. 951-961 and 971 et seq.,
NMFS must publish proposed rules to carry out IATTC recommendations
that have been approved by DOS. The Southwest Regional Administrator
also is required by 50 CFR 300.25(b)(3) to issue a direct notice to the
owners or agents of all U.S. purse seine vessels that operate in the
ETP of fishery management actions applicable to them that have been
recommended by the IATTC and approved by the DOS.
In June 2006, the IATTC adopted a Resolution for a Program on the
Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern Pacific Ocean for 2007. The June
2006 resolution is a 1-year program on the conservation of tuna in the
eastern Pacific Ocean for 2007. This resolution offers a choice for
closing the purse seine fishery: either a 6-week closure beginning
August 1, 2007, or a 6-week closure beginning November 20, 2007. The
resolution of June 2006 incorporated flexibility for nations to
administer the purse seine closure in accordance with national
legislation and national sovereignty. The selected measure should
reduce overfishing in a manner that is fair, equitable, and readily
enforceable. NMFS will select one of the two closure periods after
consideration of public comment.
The June 2006 resolution also calls upon each Party and cooperating
non-Party to ensure that each nation's longline catch of bigeye tuna in
the ETP during 2007 will not exceed the catch level of 2001 or 500 mt,
whichever is higher. The U.S. catch level of longline caught bigeye
tuna for 2001 was estimated to be 150 mt in the Convention Area.
Therefore, under this rule, the U.S. quota for longline caught bigeye
in the Convention Area would be 500 mt for 2007.
In 2006, the U.S. catch level of longline-caught bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area of 150 mt was reached. On July 6, 2006, NMFS closed the
U.S. longline fishery for bigeye tuna in the Convention Area for the
remainder of 2006.
The IATTC adopted the June 2006 resolution after considering a
variety of measures, including the use of quotas and closures (as in
1999 through 2002), a full-month purse seine closure (used in 2003),
and a 6-week purse seine closure as used in 2004, 2005, and 2006.
The proposed 2007 time/area closure is based on 2005 assessments of
the condition of the tuna stocks in the ETP and historic catch and
effort data for different portions of the ETP, as well as records
relating to implementation of quotas and closures in prior years. The
closure targets the Convention Area and is believed to be sufficient to
reduce the risk of overfishing of the tuna stocks, especially when
considered in combination with the 6-week closures implemented in 2004,
2005, and 2006. The combined multi-annual, multilateral restrictions
should increase the protections from overfishing of the tuna stocks in
the Convention Area. In an international fishery the best
[[Page 8334]]
approach is through multilateral conservation and management measures.
The IATTC met in June 2006 and reviewed tuna stock assessments and
fishery information and considered that new information in evaluating
the need for management measures for 2007 and future years. The DOS has
approved the June 2006 resolution covering the year 2007, including the
management measures described above.
On October 30, 2006, the Regional Administrator, Southwest Region,
sent a notice to owners and agents of U.S. fishing vessels of the June
2006 resolution adopted by the IATTC and approved by the DOS.
Classification
This action is proposed under the regulations for the Pacific Tuna
Fisheries at 50 CFR 300.25.
On December 8, 1999, NMFS prepared a biological opinion (BO) under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., assessing the
impacts of the fisheries as they would operate under the interim final
rule (65 FR 47, January 3, 2000) implementing the International Dolphin
Conservation Program Act (IDCPA). For the final rule (69 FR 176,
September 13, 2004) to implement the IDCPA, NMFS amended the incidental
take statement included in the December 8, 1999, BO. NMFS concluded
that the fishing activities conducted under those regulations are not
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or
threatened species under the jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat. This proposed
rule will not result in any changes in the fisheries such that there
would be impacts beyond those considered in that BO. The IATTC has also
taken action to reduce sea turtle injury and mortality from
interactions in the purse seine fishery so impacts of the fisheries
should be lower than in the past. Because this closure does not alter
the scope of the fishery management regime analyzed in the IDCPA rule,
or the scope of the impacts considered in that consultation, NMFS is
relying on that analysis to conclude that the purse seine fishery
managed under this proposed rule will not likely adversely effect any
endangered or threatened species under the jurisdiction of NMFS or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat.
On October 4, 2005, NMFS concluded that the Hawaii-based pelagic, deep-
set, tuna longline fishery managed under the Fishery Management Plan
for the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened
species under the jurisdiction of NMFS or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of critical habitat. This proposed rule will not
result in any changes in the longline fishery such that there would be
impacts beyond those considered in that BO.
The U.S. ETP tuna purse seine fisheries occasionally interact with
a variety of species of dolphin, and dolphin takes are authorized and
managed under the IDCPA. The conservation management measures in this
proposed rule do not affect the administration of that program, which
is consistent with section 303(a)(2) of the Marine Mammal Protection
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1413 (a)(2).
NMFS prepared an EA for the final rule (70 FR 69, April 12, 2005)
to implement resolutions adopted by the IATTC and by the Parties to the
Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program. The
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries concluded that there would be no
significant impact on the human environment as a result of that final
rule. The impacts of the fisheries as they will operate under the
closures in 2007 are within the range of impacts of the alternatives
considered in that EA, and are not expected to pose different impacts
to the human environment. Therefore, this action does not require
further analysis under NEPA.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA prepared describes the economic impact
that this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A
copy of the IRFA for this proposed rule is available for public comment
(see ADDRESSES). A summary of the analysis follows.
A description of the reasons for, objectives of, and legal basis
for this proposed rule is included in the preamble and not repeated
here.
This action would prohibit the use of purse seine gear to harvest
tuna in the Convention Area for a 6- week period beginning August 1,
2007, through September 11, 2007, or beginning November 20, 2007,
through December 31, 2007, and limit the annual 2007 U.S. catch of
bigeye tuna caught by longline in the ETP to 500 mt.
The proposed purse seine closure would apply to the U.S. tuna purse
seine fleet, which consists of five to ten small vessels (carrying
capacity below 400 short tons (363 mt)) and one to two large vessels
(carrying capacity 400 short tons (363 mt) or greater). The large
vessels usually fish outside U.S. waters and deliver their catch to
foreign ports or transship to processors outside the mainland United
States. The large vessels are categorized as large business entities
(revenues in excess of $4 million per year). A large purse seine vessel
typically generates 4,000 to 5,000 mt of tuna valued at between $4 and
$5 million per year. The closure should not significantly affect the
operations of the one to two large vessels because they are capable of
fishing in other areas that would remain open. Also, the one to two
large purse seine vessels do conduct fishing operation in other areas.
The small vessels are categorized as small business entities (revenues
below $4 million per year). They fish out of California in the U.S.
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) most of the year for small pelagic fish
(Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel) and for market squid in summer.
Some small vessels harvest tuna seasonally when they are available. The
proposed time/area closure will have no effect on small vessels because
they do not have the endurance and markets to fish that far south for
tunas on a regular basis.
For 2006, the United States chose to close the purse seine fishery
beginning November 20, 2006, for the remainder of 2006. In 2006 the
U.S. catch level of longline caught bigeye tuna in the Convention Area
of 150 mt was reached. On July 6, 2006, NMFS closed the U.S. longline
fishery for bigeye tuna in the Convention Area for the remainder of
2006.
The existing California based longline fishery, currently
consisting of one vessel, does catch bigeye tuna. The portion of the
fleet operating out of Hawaii has generally operated outside the
boundaries of the Convention Area, and has not made significant catches
in those waters. In 2004, 2005, and 2006, the California and Hawaii
based longline fishery was limited to 150 metric tons of bigeye tuna in
the Convention Area. A closure for the California based longline fleet
will significantly affect their operations. However, the California
based longline fleet is capable of fishing for other species of fish in
the Convention Area which should mitigate the effects of the closure.
In 2004, 2005, and 2006, the California based longline fleet landed
swordfish and showed fishery management that they were capable of
fishing for other species of fish in the Convention Area. With the
reopening of the swordfish fishery for the Hawaii fleet, effort
directed at bigeye tuna (which has mainly occurred west of the
Convention Area) should remain at the
[[Page 8335]]
same level. A closure should not significantly affect their operations
as they are capable of fishing in other areas that would remain open,
outside the boundaries of the Convention Area. In 2005, 500 mt of
bigeye tuna were caught by the U.S. longline fishery in the Convention
Area. In 2007, if the U.S. longline fishery reaches the 500 metric ton
limit, this fishery is capable of fishing in other areas that would
remain open.
NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule. This rule does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements, and the compliance
requirements for the closure areas are as described at the outset of
this summary.
NMFS considered three alternatives for this proposed rule: The 2006
IATTC Tuna Conservation Resolution allows nations to opt for a 6-week
summer closure of the purse seine fishery from August 1 through
September 20 of 2007 or a closure from November 20 through December 31,
2007. The August 1 September 20 closure alternative may have a greater
economic impact on small entities than the November 20 December 31
closure. In particular, the U.S. purse seine fleet may prefer a closure
later in the fishing year because the winter weather is not conducive
to fishing. Also, throughout the history of this fishery shipyards have
been prepared to accept vessels for scheduled repairs during the winter
months. The fishery closure later in the year allows the industry to
plan for and mitigate economic impacts of a closure while still
providing the conservation benefits to the tuna resources in the ETP.
NMFS also considered the alternative of not implementing the 2006
IATTC Tuna Conservation Resolution. This alternative would have imposed
no economic costs on small entities. However, failure to implement
measures that have been agreed on pursuant to the Convention would
violate the United States' obligations under the Convention, and would
violate the Tuna Conventions Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951-961 and 971 et seq.
Dated: February 21, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-3251 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
