Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery; Amendment 12 to the Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan, 8335-8336 [E7-3247]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
same level. A closure should not
significantly affect their operations as
they are capable of fishing in other areas
that would remain open, outside the
boundaries of the Convention Area. In
2005, 500 mt of bigeye tuna were caught
by the U.S. longline fishery in the
Convention Area. In 2007, if the U.S.
longline fishery reaches the 500 metric
ton limit, this fishery is capable of
fishing in other areas that would remain
open.
NMFS is not aware of any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule. This
rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements, and the
compliance requirements for the closure
areas are as described at the outset of
this summary.
NMFS considered three alternatives
for this proposed rule: The 2006 IATTC
Tuna Conservation Resolution allows
nations to opt for a 6–week summer
closure of the purse seine fishery from
August 1 through September 20 of 2007
or a closure from November 20 through
December 31, 2007. The August 1
September 20 closure alternative may
have a greater economic impact on
small entities than the November 20
December 31 closure. In particular, the
U.S. purse seine fleet may prefer a
closure later in the fishing year because
the winter weather is not conducive to
fishing. Also, throughout the history of
this fishery shipyards have been
prepared to accept vessels for scheduled
repairs during the winter months. The
fishery closure later in the year allows
the industry to plan for and mitigate
economic impacts of a closure while
still providing the conservation benefits
to the tuna resources in the ETP.
NMFS also considered the alternative
of not implementing the 2006 IATTC
Tuna Conservation Resolution. This
alternative would have imposed no
economic costs on small entities.
However, failure to implement measures
that have been agreed on pursuant to the
Convention would violate the United
States’ obligations under the
Convention, and would violate the Tuna
Conventions Act.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951–961 and 971 et
seq.
Dated: February 21, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3251 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[I.D. 021607G]
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council; Public Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Council) will
convene the Law Enforcement Advisory
Panel (LEAP) to review a revised Draft
Joint Amendment 27 to the Reef Fish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP)/
Amendment 14 to the Shrimp FMP.
This amendment contains alternatives
to regulate the harvest and bycatch of
red snapper by both the directed
commercial and recreational fisheries
and the shrimp fishery in the Gulf of
Mexico. The need for this amendment
arose from the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process through which a recent stock
assessment showed that the red snapper
stock in the Gulf was overfished and
overfishing was continuing.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 from 1 p.m. to
5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Beau Rivage Resort and Casino, 875
Beach Boulevard, Biloxi, Mississippi,
888–383–7037.
Council address: Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council, 2203
North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa,
Florida 33607.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Richard Leard, Deputy Executive
Director, Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council; telephone: 813–
348–1630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The LEAP
will review a scoping document for a
potential amendment to address the
need for additional management
measures for gray triggerfish, greater
amberjack, gag, and red grouper. The
LEAP will discuss enforcement
implications of the potential
implementation of a fish-tagging
program for stocks managed under
individual fishing quotas (IFQs) such as
red snapper and the potential use of a
Federal fish stamp to identify
recreational fishermen fishing in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Finally,
the LEAP will discuss any enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8335
problems and successes of the recently
implemented IFQ program for red
snapper and review the status of various
FMP amendments and other regulatory
actions previously approved by the
Council.
The LEAP consists of principal law
enforcement officers in each of the Gulf
States, as well as the NMFS, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), the U.S.
Coast Guard, and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration’s
(NOAA) General Counsel. A copy of the
agenda and related materials can be
obtained by calling the Council office at
813–348–1630.
Although other non-emergency issues
not on the agendas may come before the
LEAP for discussion, in accordance with
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA), those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Actions of the LEAP will be
restricted to those issues specifically
identified in the agendas and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
Section 305(c) of the M-SFCMA,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take action to
address the emergency.
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Tina Trezza at the
Council (see ADDRESSES) five working
days prior to the meeting.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3244 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[I.D. 012607A]
RIN 0648–AU26
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery;
Amendment 12 to the Coastal Pelagic
Species Fishery Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
8336
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Availability of an amendment to
a fishery management plan; request for
comments.
ACTION:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) has submitted Amendment 12
to the Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS)
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Secretary of Commerce review. The
intent of Amendment 12 to the CPS
FMP is to protect all species of krill off
the West Coast (i.e., California, Oregon
and Washington). This action would
prohibit the harvest of all species of krill
by any fishing vessel operating in the
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the
West Coast and would deny the use of
exempted fishing permits to allow krill
fishing.
DATES: Comments on Amendment 12
must be received by April 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this NOA identified by ‘‘I.D. 012607–
NOA’’ by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: 0648–AU26.SWR@noaa.gov.
Include the I.D. number in the subject
line of the message.
• Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
• Fax: (562) 980–4047.
Copies of Amendment 12, which
includes an Environmental Assessment/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis/
Regulatory Impact Review, are available
from Donald O. McIssac, Executive
Director, Pacific Fishery Management
Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place,
Suite 200, Portland, OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua B. Lindsay, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, NMFS, at 562–980–4034 or
Mike Burner, Pacific Fishery
Management Council, at 503–820–2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CPS
fishery in the EEZ off the West Coast is
managed under the CPS FMP, which
was developed by the Council pursuant
to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). The CPS FMP
was approved by the Secretary of
Commerce and was implemented by
regulations that can be found at 50 CFR
part 660, subpart I.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:00 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
each Regional Fishery Management
Council to submit any amendment to an
FMP to NMFS for review and approval,
disapproval, or partial approval. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires
that NMFS, upon receiving an
amendment to an FMP, publish
notification in the Federal Register that
the amendment is available for public
review and comment. NMFS will
consider the public comments received
during the comment period described
above in determining whether to
approve, disapprove, or partially
approve Amendment 12.
As the principal food source for many
fish and non-fish species, krill are a
critical component of the marine
ecosystem. Off the West Coast krill are
important prey for a variety of fish
species, including many Councilmanaged stocks. Krill are also a
principal food source for many species
of marine mammals and seabirds; some
of which are listed as threatened or
endangered and warrant special efforts
for protection and recovery. Protecting
krill will likely minimize adverse
impacts on these fish stocks and living
marine resources and in turn, help to
maintain ecological relationships and
ensure the long-term health and
productivity of the West Coast
ecosystem. Amendment 12 is an attempt
to incorporate ecosystem conservation
principles into fishery management
programs by protecting, to the extent
practicable, krill resources, which are an
integral part of that ecosystem.
At this time, while a krill fishery off
the U.S. West Coast does not exist, there
also are no Federal regulations that limit
fishing for krill in the EEZ. The states
of Washington, Oregon, and California
prohibit their vessels from fishing for
krill and prohibit landings of krill into
their respective ports. However, these
prohibitions would not prevent a fishery
from developing in the West Coast EEZ
by vessels from outside of the region, as
long as landings were not made into a
West Coast port.
If adopted, Amendment 12 would add
all species of krill as a management unit
species under the CPS FMP and would
place krill under a newly established
‘‘prohibited harvest species’’ category.
This new category would differ from the
existing ‘‘prohibited species’’ definition
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the FMP because ‘‘prohibited harvest
species’’ may not be taken by any
fishery or gear type in the U.S. EEZ.
Optimum yield (OY) for krill would be
zero and the harvest of krill would be
prohibited. In contrast, ‘‘prohibited
species’’ may not be taken and retained
incidentally by CPS fishery participants,
but are legally harvested under
provisions in other Council FMPs and
Federal regulations. Amendment 12 also
proposes that no exempted fishing
permits (EFPs) be issued under the EFP
procedures of the CPS FMP to allow
individuals to harvest krill as an
exception to the prohibition of harvest.
These actions would fully achieve the
objectives of the amendment to the
extent practicable, recognizing that
environmental conditions and the
responses of krill and other resources to
changes in environmental conditions
are beyond the control of the Council.
NMFS and the Council have
considered the potential for
development of a krill fishery and the
potentially drastic effects a fishery
could have on krill resources and on the
fish and other species, such as birds and
mammals, that are dependent on, or that
are sensitive to, the abundance and
availability of krill. The Council has
agreed it is critical to take preventive
action at this time to ensure that a krill
fishery will not develop that could
potentially harm krill stocks, and in
turn harm other fish and non-fish
stocks. Therefore, NMFS proposes to
prohibit krill fishing in the EEZ off the
West Coast.
Public comments on Amendment 12
must be received by April 27, 2007, to
be considered by NMFS in the decision
whether to approve, disapprove, or
partially approve Amendment 12. A
proposed rule to implement
Amendment 12 has been submitted for
Secretarial review and approval. NMFS
expects to publish and request public
comment on the proposed regulation to
implement Amendment 12 in the near
future.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–3247 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8335-8336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3247]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[I.D. 012607A]
RIN 0648-AU26
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery;
Amendment 12 to the Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
[[Page 8336]]
ACTION: Availability of an amendment to a fishery management plan;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) has submitted Amendment 12 to the Coastal Pelagic Species
(CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Secretary of Commerce review.
The intent of Amendment 12 to the CPS FMP is to protect all species of
krill off the West Coast (i.e., California, Oregon and Washington).
This action would prohibit the harvest of all species of krill by any
fishing vessel operating in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the
West Coast and would deny the use of exempted fishing permits to allow
krill fishing.
DATES: Comments on Amendment 12 must be received by April 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this NOA identified by ``I.D.
012607-NOA'' by any of the following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AU26.SWR@noaa.gov. Include the I.D. number in
the subject line of the message.
Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional Administrator, Southwest
Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Fax: (562) 980-4047.
Copies of Amendment 12, which includes an Environmental Assessment/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis/Regulatory Impact Review, are
available from Donald O. McIssac, Executive Director, Pacific Fishery
Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland, OR
97220-1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua B. Lindsay, Sustainable
Fisheries Division, NMFS, at 562-980-4034 or Mike Burner, Pacific
Fishery Management Council, at 503-820-2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CPS fishery in the EEZ off the West
Coast is managed under the CPS FMP, which was developed by the Council
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The CPS FMP was approved by the Secretary
of Commerce and was implemented by regulations that can be found at 50
CFR part 660, subpart I.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires each Regional Fishery Management
Council to submit any amendment to an FMP to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving an amendment to an FMP, publish
notification in the Federal Register that the amendment is available
for public review and comment. NMFS will consider the public comments
received during the comment period described above in determining
whether to approve, disapprove, or partially approve Amendment 12.
As the principal food source for many fish and non-fish species,
krill are a critical component of the marine ecosystem. Off the West
Coast krill are important prey for a variety of fish species, including
many Council-managed stocks. Krill are also a principal food source for
many species of marine mammals and seabirds; some of which are listed
as threatened or endangered and warrant special efforts for protection
and recovery. Protecting krill will likely minimize adverse impacts on
these fish stocks and living marine resources and in turn, help to
maintain ecological relationships and ensure the long-term health and
productivity of the West Coast ecosystem. Amendment 12 is an attempt to
incorporate ecosystem conservation principles into fishery management
programs by protecting, to the extent practicable, krill resources,
which are an integral part of that ecosystem.
At this time, while a krill fishery off the U.S. West Coast does
not exist, there also are no Federal regulations that limit fishing for
krill in the EEZ. The states of Washington, Oregon, and California
prohibit their vessels from fishing for krill and prohibit landings of
krill into their respective ports. However, these prohibitions would
not prevent a fishery from developing in the West Coast EEZ by vessels
from outside of the region, as long as landings were not made into a
West Coast port.
If adopted, Amendment 12 would add all species of krill as a
management unit species under the CPS FMP and would place krill under a
newly established ``prohibited harvest species'' category. This new
category would differ from the existing ``prohibited species''
definition in the FMP because ``prohibited harvest species'' may not be
taken by any fishery or gear type in the U.S. EEZ. Optimum yield (OY)
for krill would be zero and the harvest of krill would be prohibited.
In contrast, ``prohibited species'' may not be taken and retained
incidentally by CPS fishery participants, but are legally harvested
under provisions in other Council FMPs and Federal regulations.
Amendment 12 also proposes that no exempted fishing permits (EFPs) be
issued under the EFP procedures of the CPS FMP to allow individuals to
harvest krill as an exception to the prohibition of harvest. These
actions would fully achieve the objectives of the amendment to the
extent practicable, recognizing that environmental conditions and the
responses of krill and other resources to changes in environmental
conditions are beyond the control of the Council.
NMFS and the Council have considered the potential for development
of a krill fishery and the potentially drastic effects a fishery could
have on krill resources and on the fish and other species, such as
birds and mammals, that are dependent on, or that are sensitive to, the
abundance and availability of krill. The Council has agreed it is
critical to take preventive action at this time to ensure that a krill
fishery will not develop that could potentially harm krill stocks, and
in turn harm other fish and non-fish stocks. Therefore, NMFS proposes
to prohibit krill fishing in the EEZ off the West Coast.
Public comments on Amendment 12 must be received by April 27, 2007,
to be considered by NMFS in the decision whether to approve,
disapprove, or partially approve Amendment 12. A proposed rule to
implement Amendment 12 has been submitted for Secretarial review and
approval. NMFS expects to publish and request public comment on the
proposed regulation to implement Amendment 12 in the near future.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-3247 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S