Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries and the C & D Canal, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC, 8112-8114 [E7-3056]
Download as PDF
8112
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
The owner of the bridge, New Jersey
Transit Rail Operation (NJTRO),
requested a temporary deviation to
facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance,
electrical and structural maintenance.
The bridge will not be able to open
while the bridge maintenance is
underway.
Under this temporary deviation the
NJTRO Railroad Bridge may remain in
the closed position for two 24-hour time
periods between February 20, 2007 and
February 24, 2007. The exact two 24hour closure dates will be selected
depending upon favorable weather
necessary to perform the required
repairs.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: February 15, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 07–860 Filed 2–21–07; 12:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–07–011]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay
and Its Tributaries and the C & D
Canal, Maryland, Virginia, and
Washington, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
all navigable waters of the Captain of
the Port Baltimore zone. The temporary
safety zone restricts vessels from
transiting the zone during ice season,
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore, Maryland or designated
representative through the issuance of
broadcast notice to mariners and marine
safety information bulletins. This safety
zone is necessary to protect mariners
from the hazards associated with ice.
DATES: This rule is effective from
February 5, 2007 until April 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD05–07–
011 and are available for inspection or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:15 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM
and for making this regulation effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. While formation of ice
generally occurs in the winter months,
predicting when ice will begin to form,
where it will be located and the
thickness of the ice is difficult and
depends on the weather conditions. Ice
has just begun to form in the area of this
safety zone. Publishing an NPRM and
delaying its effective date would be
contrary to public interest, since
immediate action is needed to protect
mariners against potential hazards
associated with ice and to ensure the
safety of the environment on the Upper
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
Background and Purpose
Coast Guard
ACTION:
copying at Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point
Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald L. Houck, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, at (410) 576–2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
During a moderate or severe winter,
frozen waterways present numerous
hazards to vessels. Ice in a waterway
may hamper a vessel’s ability to
maneuver, and could cause visual aids
to navigation to be submerged,
destroyed or moved off station. Ice
abrasions and ice pressure could also
compromise a vessel’s watertight
integrity, and non-steel hulled vessels
would be exposed to a greater risk of
hull breach.
When ice conditions develop to a
point where vessel operations become
unsafe, it becomes necessary to impose
operating restrictions to ensure the safe
navigation of vessels. A safety zone is a
tool available to the Captain of the Port
(COTP) to restrict and manage vessel
movement when hazardous conditions
exist. The COTP Baltimore is
establishing a safety zone within all
navigable waters within the COTP
Baltimore zone, that will restrict access
to only those vessels meeting conditions
specified in broadcast notice to mariners
and marine safety information bulletins.
Ice generally begins to form in the
Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, including the Chesapeake
and Delaware (C & D) Canal, in late
December or early January. During a
moderate or severe winter, ice in
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
navigable waters can become a serious
problem, requiring the use of federal,
state and private ice breaking resources.
The Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore will use its COTP authority to
promote the safe transit of vessels
through ice-congested waters and the
continuation of waterborne commerce
throughout the winter season.
Ice fields in the Upper Chesapeake
Bay and its tributaries move with
prevailing winds and currents. Heavy
ice buildups can occur in the C & D
Canal, from Town Point Wharf to Reedy
Point. Other areas that are commonly
affected by high volumes of ice are, the
Elk River, Susquehanna River, Patapsco
River, Nanticoke River, Wicomico River,
Tangier Sound, Pocomoke River and
Sound, and the Potomac River. Once ice
build up begins it can affect the transit
of large ocean-going vessels.
Ice reports over the last several years
have varied greatly on the Upper
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
Historically, ice has been reported as
NEW, FAST OR PACK ICE. The
percentage of ice covering the river has
been reported anywhere from 10% to
100%. The thickness has been reported
anywhere from 1⁄2″ to 18″ thick.
Discussion of Rule
The purpose of this regulation is to
promote maritime safety, and to protect
the environment and mariners transiting
the area from the potential hazards due
to ice conditions that become a threat to
navigation. This rule establishes a safety
zone encompassing all waters of the
COTP Baltimore zone. The COTP will
notify the maritime community, via
marine broadcasts, of the location and
thickness of the ice as well as the ability
of vessels to transit through the safety
zone. Mariners allowed to travel
through the safety zone with the
permission of the COTP must maintain
a minimum safe speed, in accordance
with the Navigation Rules as seen in 33
CFR Chapter I, Subchapters D and E.
Ice Condition One means the
emergency condition in which ice has
largely covered the upper Chesapeake
Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D
Canal. Convoys are required and
restrictions to shaft horsepower and
vessel transit are imposed.
Ice Condition Two means the alert
condition in which at least 2 inches of
ice begins to form in the Upper
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and
the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore
may impose restrictions, including but
not limited to, shaft horsepower and
hull type restrictions.
Ice Condition Three means the
readiness condition in which weather
conditions are favorable for the
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
8113
formation of ice in the navigable waters
of the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, and the C & D Canal. Daily
reports for the Coast Guard Stations and
commercial vessels are monitored. (No
limitations on vessel traffic, hull type or
shaft horsepower).
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Regulatory Evaluation
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not significant under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under
section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 605(b)) that this
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce or otherwise determine
compliance with Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–743–3247).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:15 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Federalism
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 12211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. It has not been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy
Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
establishes a safety zone.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket.
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
8114
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–011 to
read as follows:
I
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
§ 165.T05–011 Safety zone; Upper
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries and the
C & D Canal, MD, VA and Washington, DC
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All inland,
navigable waters of the Captain of the
Port, Baltimore zone.
(b) Regulations. All persons are
required to comply with the general
regulations governing safety zones in 33
CFR 165.23 of this part.
(1) All vessel traffic is prohibited in
the safety zone unless they meet the
requirements set forth by the Captain of
the Port by Marine Safety Radio
Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band
radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ).
(2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
VHF marine band radio, channels 13
and 16. The Captain of the Port can be
contacted at telephone number (410)
576–2693.
(3) All persons desiring to transit
through the safety zone must contact the
Captain of the Port at telephone number
(410) 576–2693 or on VHF channel 13
or 16 to seek permission prior to
transiting the area. If permission is
granted, all persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Baltimore, MD or
designated representative.
(4) The Captain of the Port will notify
the public of any changes in the status
of this safety zone by Marine Safety
Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine
band radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ).
(5) Mariners granted permission to
transit the safety zone must maintain
the minimum safe speed necessary to
maintain navigation as per 33 CFR
Chapter I, Subchapters D and E.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:15 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
(c) Definitions as used in this section.
(1) Captain of the Port means the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore or any Coast Guard
commissioned warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port to act on his behalf.
(2) Ice Condition One means the
emergency condition in which ice has
largely covered the Upper Chesapeake
Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D
Canal. Convoys are required and
restrictions to shaft horsepower and
vessel transit are imposed.
(3) Ice Condition Two means the alert
condition in which at least 2 inches of
ice begins to form in the Upper
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and
the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore
may impose restrictions, including but
not limited to, shaft horsepower and
hull type restrictions.
(4) Ice Condition Three means the
readiness condition in which weather
conditions are favorable for the
formation of ice in the navigable waters
of the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, including the C & D Canal.
Daily reports for the Coast Guard
Stations and commercial vessels are
monitored. (No limitations on vessel
traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower).
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zones by Federal,
State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from February 5, 2007
until April 15, 2007.
Dated: February 5, 2007.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7–3056 Filed 2–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Poverty Guidelines as issued by the
Department of Health and Human
Services.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective as
of February 23, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K St., NW., Washington, DC 20007;
(202) 295–1624; mcohan@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
1007(a)(2) of the Legal Services
Corporation Act (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C.
2996f(a)(2), requires the Corporation to
establish maximum income levels for
individuals eligible for legal assistance,
and the Act provides that other
specified factors shall be taken into
account along with income.
Section 1611.3(c) of the Corporation’s
regulations establishes a maximum
income level equivalent to one hundred
and twenty-five percent (125%) of the
Federal Poverty Guidelines. Since 1982,
the Department of Health and Human
Services has been responsible for
updating and issuing the Federal
Poverty Guidelines. The revised figures
for 2007 set out below are equivalent to
125% of the current Federal Poverty
Guidelines as published on January 24,
2007 (72 FR 3147).
In addition, LSC is publishing charts
listing income levels that are 200% of
the Federal Poverty Guidelines. These
charts are for reference purposes only as
an aid to grant recipients in assessing
the financial eligibility of an applicant
whose income is greater than 200% of
the applicable Federal Poverty
Guidelines amount, but less than 200%
of the applicable Federal Poverty
Guidelines amount (and who may be
found to be financially eligible under
duly adopted exceptions to the annual
income ceiling in accordance with
sections 1611.3, 1611.4 and 1611.5).
45 CFR Part 1611
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1611
Income Level for Individuals Eligible
for Assistance
Grant Programs—Law, Legal Services.
I For reasons set forth above, 45 CFR
part 1611 is amended as follows:
Legal Services Corporation.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Legal Services
Corporation (‘‘Corporation’’) is required
by law to establish maximum income
levels for individuals eligible for legal
assistance. This document updates the
specified income levels to reflect the
annual amendments to the Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 1611—ELIGIBILITY
1. The authority citation for part 1611
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1006(b)(1), 1007(a)(1)
Legal Services Corporation Act of 1974, 42
U.S.C. 2996e(b)(1), 2996f(a)(1), 2996f(a)(2).
2. Appendix A of part 1611 is revised
to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8112-8114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3056]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-07-011]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries and the C &
D Canal, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in all
navigable waters of the Captain of the Port Baltimore zone. The
temporary safety zone restricts vessels from transiting the zone during
ice season, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore,
Maryland or designated representative through the issuance of broadcast
notice to mariners and marine safety information bulletins. This safety
zone is necessary to protect mariners from the hazards associated with
ice.
DATES: This rule is effective from February 5, 2007 until April 15,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD05-07-011 and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 8 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576-2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this
regulation effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. While formation of ice generally occurs in the winter months,
predicting when ice will begin to form, where it will be located and
the thickness of the ice is difficult and depends on the weather
conditions. Ice has just begun to form in the area of this safety zone.
Publishing an NPRM and delaying its effective date would be contrary to
public interest, since immediate action is needed to protect mariners
against potential hazards associated with ice and to ensure the safety
of the environment on the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
Background and Purpose
During a moderate or severe winter, frozen waterways present
numerous hazards to vessels. Ice in a waterway may hamper a vessel's
ability to maneuver, and could cause visual aids to navigation to be
submerged, destroyed or moved off station. Ice abrasions and ice
pressure could also compromise a vessel's watertight integrity, and
non-steel hulled vessels would be exposed to a greater risk of hull
breach.
When ice conditions develop to a point where vessel operations
become unsafe, it becomes necessary to impose operating restrictions to
ensure the safe navigation of vessels. A safety zone is a tool
available to the Captain of the Port (COTP) to restrict and manage
vessel movement when hazardous conditions exist. The COTP Baltimore is
establishing a safety zone within all navigable waters within the COTP
Baltimore zone, that will restrict access to only those vessels meeting
conditions specified in broadcast notice to mariners and marine safety
information bulletins.
Ice generally begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, including the Chesapeake and Delaware (C & D) Canal, in
late December or early January. During a moderate or severe winter, ice
in navigable waters can become a serious problem, requiring the use of
federal, state and private ice breaking resources. The Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore will use its COTP authority to promote the safe
transit of vessels through ice-congested waters and the continuation of
waterborne commerce throughout the winter season.
Ice fields in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries move
with prevailing winds and currents. Heavy ice buildups can occur in the
C & D Canal, from Town Point Wharf to Reedy Point. Other areas that are
commonly affected by high volumes of ice are, the Elk River,
Susquehanna River, Patapsco River, Nanticoke River, Wicomico River,
Tangier Sound, Pocomoke River and Sound, and the Potomac River. Once
ice build up begins it can affect the transit of large ocean-going
vessels.
Ice reports over the last several years have varied greatly on the
Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Historically, ice has been
reported as NEW, FAST OR PACK ICE. The percentage of ice covering the
river has been reported anywhere from 10% to 100%. The thickness has
been reported anywhere from \1/2\'' to 18'' thick.
Discussion of Rule
The purpose of this regulation is to promote maritime safety, and
to protect the environment and mariners transiting the area from the
potential hazards due to ice conditions that become a threat to
navigation. This rule establishes a safety zone encompassing all waters
of the COTP Baltimore zone. The COTP will notify the maritime
community, via marine broadcasts, of the location and thickness of the
ice as well as the ability of vessels to transit through the safety
zone. Mariners allowed to travel through the safety zone with the
permission of the COTP must maintain a minimum safe speed, in
accordance with the Navigation Rules as seen in 33 CFR Chapter I,
Subchapters D and E.
Ice Condition One means the emergency condition in which ice has
largely covered the upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C
& D Canal. Convoys are required and restrictions to shaft horsepower
and vessel transit are imposed.
Ice Condition Two means the alert condition in which at least 2
inches of ice begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, and the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore may impose
restrictions, including but not limited to, shaft horsepower and hull
type restrictions.
Ice Condition Three means the readiness condition in which weather
conditions are favorable for the
[[Page 8113]]
formation of ice in the navigable waters of the Upper Chesapeake Bay
and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. Daily reports for the Coast
Guard Stations and commercial vessels are monitored. (No limitations on
vessel traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower).
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 605(b)) that this will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-743-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule establishes a safety zone.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are available in the docket.
[[Page 8114]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-011 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-011 Safety zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries and the C & D Canal, MD, VA and Washington, DC
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
inland, navigable waters of the Captain of the Port, Baltimore zone.
(b) Regulations. All persons are required to comply with the
general regulations governing safety zones in 33 CFR 165.23 of this
part.
(1) All vessel traffic is prohibited in the safety zone unless they
meet the requirements set forth by the Captain of the Port by Marine
Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1
MHZ).
(2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on VHF marine band radio, channels 13 and 16. The Captain of
the Port can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693.
(3) All persons desiring to transit through the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number (410) 576-2693 or
on VHF channel 13 or 16 to seek permission prior to transiting the
area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore, MD or
designated representative.
(4) The Captain of the Port will notify the public of any changes
in the status of this safety zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on
VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ).
(5) Mariners granted permission to transit the safety zone must
maintain the minimum safe speed necessary to maintain navigation as per
33 CFR Chapter I, Subchapters D and E.
(c) Definitions as used in this section.
(1) Captain of the Port means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned warrant or petty officer who
has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(2) Ice Condition One means the emergency condition in which ice
has largely covered the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and
the C & D Canal. Convoys are required and restrictions to shaft
horsepower and vessel transit are imposed.
(3) Ice Condition Two means the alert condition in which at least 2
inches of ice begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, and the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore may impose
restrictions, including but not limited to, shaft horsepower and hull
type restrictions.
(4) Ice Condition Three means the readiness condition in which
weather conditions are favorable for the formation of ice in the
navigable waters of the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries,
including the C & D Canal. Daily reports for the Coast Guard Stations
and commercial vessels are monitored. (No limitations on vessel
traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower).
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zones by Federal, State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from February
5, 2007 until April 15, 2007.
Dated: February 5, 2007.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Baltimore,
Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7-3056 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P