Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries and the C & D Canal, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC, 8112-8114 [E7-3056]

Download as PDF 8112 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations The owner of the bridge, New Jersey Transit Rail Operation (NJTRO), requested a temporary deviation to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance, electrical and structural maintenance. The bridge will not be able to open while the bridge maintenance is underway. Under this temporary deviation the NJTRO Railroad Bridge may remain in the closed position for two 24-hour time periods between February 20, 2007 and February 24, 2007. The exact two 24hour closure dates will be selected depending upon favorable weather necessary to perform the required repairs. In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. Dated: February 15, 2007. Gary Kassof, Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 07–860 Filed 2–21–07; 12:47 pm] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 33 CFR Part 165 [CGD05–07–011] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries and the C & D Canal, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in all navigable waters of the Captain of the Port Baltimore zone. The temporary safety zone restricts vessels from transiting the zone during ice season, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland or designated representative through the issuance of broadcast notice to mariners and marine safety information bulletins. This safety zone is necessary to protect mariners from the hazards associated with ice. DATES: This rule is effective from February 5, 2007 until April 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket are part of docket CGD05–07– 011 and are available for inspection or VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 Feb 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Regulatory Information We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this regulation effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. While formation of ice generally occurs in the winter months, predicting when ice will begin to form, where it will be located and the thickness of the ice is difficult and depends on the weather conditions. Ice has just begun to form in the area of this safety zone. Publishing an NPRM and delaying its effective date would be contrary to public interest, since immediate action is needed to protect mariners against potential hazards associated with ice and to ensure the safety of the environment on the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Background and Purpose Coast Guard ACTION: copying at Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576–2674. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During a moderate or severe winter, frozen waterways present numerous hazards to vessels. Ice in a waterway may hamper a vessel’s ability to maneuver, and could cause visual aids to navigation to be submerged, destroyed or moved off station. Ice abrasions and ice pressure could also compromise a vessel’s watertight integrity, and non-steel hulled vessels would be exposed to a greater risk of hull breach. When ice conditions develop to a point where vessel operations become unsafe, it becomes necessary to impose operating restrictions to ensure the safe navigation of vessels. A safety zone is a tool available to the Captain of the Port (COTP) to restrict and manage vessel movement when hazardous conditions exist. The COTP Baltimore is establishing a safety zone within all navigable waters within the COTP Baltimore zone, that will restrict access to only those vessels meeting conditions specified in broadcast notice to mariners and marine safety information bulletins. Ice generally begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, including the Chesapeake and Delaware (C & D) Canal, in late December or early January. During a moderate or severe winter, ice in PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 navigable waters can become a serious problem, requiring the use of federal, state and private ice breaking resources. The Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore will use its COTP authority to promote the safe transit of vessels through ice-congested waters and the continuation of waterborne commerce throughout the winter season. Ice fields in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries move with prevailing winds and currents. Heavy ice buildups can occur in the C & D Canal, from Town Point Wharf to Reedy Point. Other areas that are commonly affected by high volumes of ice are, the Elk River, Susquehanna River, Patapsco River, Nanticoke River, Wicomico River, Tangier Sound, Pocomoke River and Sound, and the Potomac River. Once ice build up begins it can affect the transit of large ocean-going vessels. Ice reports over the last several years have varied greatly on the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Historically, ice has been reported as NEW, FAST OR PACK ICE. The percentage of ice covering the river has been reported anywhere from 10% to 100%. The thickness has been reported anywhere from 1⁄2″ to 18″ thick. Discussion of Rule The purpose of this regulation is to promote maritime safety, and to protect the environment and mariners transiting the area from the potential hazards due to ice conditions that become a threat to navigation. This rule establishes a safety zone encompassing all waters of the COTP Baltimore zone. The COTP will notify the maritime community, via marine broadcasts, of the location and thickness of the ice as well as the ability of vessels to transit through the safety zone. Mariners allowed to travel through the safety zone with the permission of the COTP must maintain a minimum safe speed, in accordance with the Navigation Rules as seen in 33 CFR Chapter I, Subchapters D and E. Ice Condition One means the emergency condition in which ice has largely covered the upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. Convoys are required and restrictions to shaft horsepower and vessel transit are imposed. Ice Condition Two means the alert condition in which at least 2 inches of ice begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore may impose restrictions, including but not limited to, shaft horsepower and hull type restrictions. Ice Condition Three means the readiness condition in which weather conditions are favorable for the E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 8113 formation of ice in the navigable waters of the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. Daily reports for the Coast Guard Stations and commercial vessels are monitored. (No limitations on vessel traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower). Collection of Information This rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects Regulatory Evaluation A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism. This rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 605(b)) that this will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–743–3247). VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 Feb 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Federalism Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule would not affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321– 4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This rule establishes a safety zone. Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’ are available in the docket. E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1 8114 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Rules and Regulations List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. I For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1 2. Add temporary § 165.T05–011 to read as follows: I jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES § 165.T05–011 Safety zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries and the C & D Canal, MD, VA and Washington, DC (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All inland, navigable waters of the Captain of the Port, Baltimore zone. (b) Regulations. All persons are required to comply with the general regulations governing safety zones in 33 CFR 165.23 of this part. (1) All vessel traffic is prohibited in the safety zone unless they meet the requirements set forth by the Captain of the Port by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ). (2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be contacted on VHF marine band radio, channels 13 and 16. The Captain of the Port can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576–2693. (3) All persons desiring to transit through the safety zone must contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number (410) 576–2693 or on VHF channel 13 or 16 to seek permission prior to transiting the area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore, MD or designated representative. (4) The Captain of the Port will notify the public of any changes in the status of this safety zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ). (5) Mariners granted permission to transit the safety zone must maintain the minimum safe speed necessary to maintain navigation as per 33 CFR Chapter I, Subchapters D and E. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 Feb 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 (c) Definitions as used in this section. (1) Captain of the Port means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. (2) Ice Condition One means the emergency condition in which ice has largely covered the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. Convoys are required and restrictions to shaft horsepower and vessel transit are imposed. (3) Ice Condition Two means the alert condition in which at least 2 inches of ice begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore may impose restrictions, including but not limited to, shaft horsepower and hull type restrictions. (4) Ice Condition Three means the readiness condition in which weather conditions are favorable for the formation of ice in the navigable waters of the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, including the C & D Canal. Daily reports for the Coast Guard Stations and commercial vessels are monitored. (No limitations on vessel traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower). (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the zones by Federal, State and local agencies. (e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from February 5, 2007 until April 15, 2007. Dated: February 5, 2007. Jonathan C. Burton, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland. [FR Doc. E7–3056 Filed 2–22–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Poverty Guidelines as issued by the Department of Health and Human Services. EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective as of February 23, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K St., NW., Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295–1624; mcohan@lsc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1007(a)(2) of the Legal Services Corporation Act (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 2996f(a)(2), requires the Corporation to establish maximum income levels for individuals eligible for legal assistance, and the Act provides that other specified factors shall be taken into account along with income. Section 1611.3(c) of the Corporation’s regulations establishes a maximum income level equivalent to one hundred and twenty-five percent (125%) of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. Since 1982, the Department of Health and Human Services has been responsible for updating and issuing the Federal Poverty Guidelines. The revised figures for 2007 set out below are equivalent to 125% of the current Federal Poverty Guidelines as published on January 24, 2007 (72 FR 3147). In addition, LSC is publishing charts listing income levels that are 200% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. These charts are for reference purposes only as an aid to grant recipients in assessing the financial eligibility of an applicant whose income is greater than 200% of the applicable Federal Poverty Guidelines amount, but less than 200% of the applicable Federal Poverty Guidelines amount (and who may be found to be financially eligible under duly adopted exceptions to the annual income ceiling in accordance with sections 1611.3, 1611.4 and 1611.5). 45 CFR Part 1611 List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1611 Income Level for Individuals Eligible for Assistance Grant Programs—Law, Legal Services. I For reasons set forth above, 45 CFR part 1611 is amended as follows: Legal Services Corporation. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Legal Services Corporation (‘‘Corporation’’) is required by law to establish maximum income levels for individuals eligible for legal assistance. This document updates the specified income levels to reflect the annual amendments to the Federal SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 PART 1611—ELIGIBILITY 1. The authority citation for part 1611 continues to read as follows: I Authority: Secs. 1006(b)(1), 1007(a)(1) Legal Services Corporation Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 2996e(b)(1), 2996f(a)(1), 2996f(a)(2). 2. Appendix A of part 1611 is revised to read as follows: I E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8112-8114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD05-07-011]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries and the C & 
D Canal, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in all 
navigable waters of the Captain of the Port Baltimore zone. The 
temporary safety zone restricts vessels from transiting the zone during 
ice season, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore, 
Maryland or designated representative through the issuance of broadcast 
notice to mariners and marine safety information bulletins. This safety 
zone is necessary to protect mariners from the hazards associated with 
ice.

DATES: This rule is effective from February 5, 2007 until April 15, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket CGD05-07-011 and are available for 
inspection or copying at Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 
Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 8 a.m. and 
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast Guard 
Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576-2674.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the Coast Guard finds 
that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this 
regulation effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal 
Register. While formation of ice generally occurs in the winter months, 
predicting when ice will begin to form, where it will be located and 
the thickness of the ice is difficult and depends on the weather 
conditions. Ice has just begun to form in the area of this safety zone. 
Publishing an NPRM and delaying its effective date would be contrary to 
public interest, since immediate action is needed to protect mariners 
against potential hazards associated with ice and to ensure the safety 
of the environment on the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.

Background and Purpose

    During a moderate or severe winter, frozen waterways present 
numerous hazards to vessels. Ice in a waterway may hamper a vessel's 
ability to maneuver, and could cause visual aids to navigation to be 
submerged, destroyed or moved off station. Ice abrasions and ice 
pressure could also compromise a vessel's watertight integrity, and 
non-steel hulled vessels would be exposed to a greater risk of hull 
breach.
    When ice conditions develop to a point where vessel operations 
become unsafe, it becomes necessary to impose operating restrictions to 
ensure the safe navigation of vessels. A safety zone is a tool 
available to the Captain of the Port (COTP) to restrict and manage 
vessel movement when hazardous conditions exist. The COTP Baltimore is 
establishing a safety zone within all navigable waters within the COTP 
Baltimore zone, that will restrict access to only those vessels meeting 
conditions specified in broadcast notice to mariners and marine safety 
information bulletins.
    Ice generally begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its 
tributaries, including the Chesapeake and Delaware (C & D) Canal, in 
late December or early January. During a moderate or severe winter, ice 
in navigable waters can become a serious problem, requiring the use of 
federal, state and private ice breaking resources. The Commander, Coast 
Guard Sector Baltimore will use its COTP authority to promote the safe 
transit of vessels through ice-congested waters and the continuation of 
waterborne commerce throughout the winter season.
    Ice fields in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries move 
with prevailing winds and currents. Heavy ice buildups can occur in the 
C & D Canal, from Town Point Wharf to Reedy Point. Other areas that are 
commonly affected by high volumes of ice are, the Elk River, 
Susquehanna River, Patapsco River, Nanticoke River, Wicomico River, 
Tangier Sound, Pocomoke River and Sound, and the Potomac River. Once 
ice build up begins it can affect the transit of large ocean-going 
vessels.
    Ice reports over the last several years have varied greatly on the 
Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Historically, ice has been 
reported as NEW, FAST OR PACK ICE. The percentage of ice covering the 
river has been reported anywhere from 10% to 100%. The thickness has 
been reported anywhere from \1/2\'' to 18'' thick.

Discussion of Rule

    The purpose of this regulation is to promote maritime safety, and 
to protect the environment and mariners transiting the area from the 
potential hazards due to ice conditions that become a threat to 
navigation. This rule establishes a safety zone encompassing all waters 
of the COTP Baltimore zone. The COTP will notify the maritime 
community, via marine broadcasts, of the location and thickness of the 
ice as well as the ability of vessels to transit through the safety 
zone. Mariners allowed to travel through the safety zone with the 
permission of the COTP must maintain a minimum safe speed, in 
accordance with the Navigation Rules as seen in 33 CFR Chapter I, 
Subchapters D and E.
    Ice Condition One means the emergency condition in which ice has 
largely covered the upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and the C 
& D Canal. Convoys are required and restrictions to shaft horsepower 
and vessel transit are imposed.
    Ice Condition Two means the alert condition in which at least 2 
inches of ice begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its 
tributaries, and the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore may impose 
restrictions, including but not limited to, shaft horsepower and hull 
type restrictions.
    Ice Condition Three means the readiness condition in which weather 
conditions are favorable for the

[[Page 8113]]

formation of ice in the navigable waters of the Upper Chesapeake Bay 
and its tributaries, and the C & D Canal. Daily reports for the Coast 
Guard Stations and commercial vessels are monitored. (No limitations on 
vessel traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower).

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The 
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. 
It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of 
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal that a 
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures 
of DHS is unnecessary.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 605(b)) that this will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-743-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule would call for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that this rule does not have 
implications for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule would not result in such expenditure, we do 
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule would not affect a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. 
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus 
standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD 
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a 
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. 
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, 
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental 
documentation. This rule establishes a safety zone.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an 
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion 
Determination'' are available in the docket.

[[Page 8114]]

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1

0
2. Add temporary Sec.  165.T05-011 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T05-011  Safety zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay and its 
tributaries and the C & D Canal, MD, VA and Washington, DC

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All 
inland, navigable waters of the Captain of the Port, Baltimore zone.
    (b) Regulations. All persons are required to comply with the 
general regulations governing safety zones in 33 CFR 165.23 of this 
part.
    (1) All vessel traffic is prohibited in the safety zone unless they 
meet the requirements set forth by the Captain of the Port by Marine 
Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1 
MHZ).
    (2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be 
contacted on VHF marine band radio, channels 13 and 16. The Captain of 
the Port can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693.
    (3) All persons desiring to transit through the safety zone must 
contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number (410) 576-2693 or 
on VHF channel 13 or 16 to seek permission prior to transiting the 
area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply 
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore, MD or 
designated representative.
    (4) The Captain of the Port will notify the public of any changes 
in the status of this safety zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on 
VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ).
    (5) Mariners granted permission to transit the safety zone must 
maintain the minimum safe speed necessary to maintain navigation as per 
33 CFR Chapter I, Subchapters D and E.
    (c) Definitions as used in this section.
    (1) Captain of the Port means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector 
Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned warrant or petty officer who 
has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
    (2) Ice Condition One means the emergency condition in which ice 
has largely covered the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, and 
the C & D Canal. Convoys are required and restrictions to shaft 
horsepower and vessel transit are imposed.
    (3) Ice Condition Two means the alert condition in which at least 2 
inches of ice begins to form in the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its 
tributaries, and the C & D Canal. The COTP Baltimore may impose 
restrictions, including but not limited to, shaft horsepower and hull 
type restrictions.
    (4) Ice Condition Three means the readiness condition in which 
weather conditions are favorable for the formation of ice in the 
navigable waters of the Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, 
including the C & D Canal. Daily reports for the Coast Guard Stations 
and commercial vessels are monitored. (No limitations on vessel 
traffic, hull type or shaft horsepower).
    (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol 
and enforcement of the zones by Federal, State and local agencies.
    (e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from February 
5, 2007 until April 15, 2007.

    Dated: February 5, 2007.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Baltimore, 
Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7-3056 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P