Insect Repellent-Sunscreen Combination Products; Request for Information and Comments, 7979-7983 [E7-3008]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then
key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing at https://www.regulations.gov,
as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket,
go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Title: NSPS for Automobile and Light
Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations
(Renewal).
ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number
1064.15, OMB Control Number 2060–
0034.
ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to
expire on February 28, 2007. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may
continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this
submission is pending at OMB. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register
when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
Abstract: This Information Collection
Request (ICR) renewal is being
submitted for the NSPS for Automobile
and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR part 60, subpart
MM), which were promulgated on
December 24, 1980 (45 FR 85415). These
standards apply to the following
automobile and light duty truck
assembly plant lines: each prime coat
operation, guide coat operation, and top
coat operation commencing
construction, modification or
reconstruction after the date of proposal.
The affected entities are subject to the
General Provisions of the NSPS at 40
CFR part 60 subpart A and any changes,
or additions to the General Provisions
specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart
MM.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 745 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Respondents/Affected Entities:
Automobile and light duty truck surface
coating operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
54.
Frequency of Response: Initially,
semi-annually, and quarterly.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
156,362.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$9,733,981, which includes $1,700
annualized capital startup costs,
$91,000 annualized operating and
maintenance (O&M) costs, and
$9,641,281 annualized labor costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is no
change in the total estimated burden
currently identified in the OMB
Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens.
Dated: February 14, 2007.
Richard T. Westlund,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–3018 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0087; FRL–8114–6]
Insect Repellent-Sunscreen
Combination Products; Request for
Information and Comments
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is seeking information to
determine how insect repellentsunscreen combination products should
be regulated in order to complete the
reregistration review which was
described in the Reregistration
Eligibility Decision (RED) document for
the insect repellent DEET. This action
would consider issues such as labeling,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7979
product performance and applicable
safety standards for all currently (and
any future) registered insect repellentsunscreen combination products. The
sunscreen components of these products
are regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). Elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register is a
companion notice in which the FDA is
also requesting information and
comments on these products and for
which the FDA will be considering
rulemaking. The decision on what if any
change in the way these products are
regulated will consider information and
comments submitted in response to this
Notice.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0087, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 3055805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–
0087. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The Federal regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
7980
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket
and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400,
One Potomac Yard (South Building),
2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA.
The hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Gebken, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 305-6701; fax number: (703) 3080029; e-mail address:
gebken.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of interest to those who currently have
registered products or intend in the
future to register any insect repellentsunscreen combination products, as
well as those individuals who use these
products. Since other entities may also
be interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date, and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
Currently, there are approximately 20
combination insect repellent/sunscreen
products available for consumers. Each
of these products contains an insect
repellent component (N,N-diethyl-metatoluamide (DEET), oil of citronella or
IR3535)) and a sunscreen component.
Combination products are available in
lotion, cream, and spray-on
formulations. These products are
currently marketed for use by the entire
family. These products provide
consumers with the convenience of
using one product as opposed to the use
of multiple products. In addition, it has
been suggested that these products,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
containing both insect repellent and
sunscreen components in one
formulation, preserve the efficacy of
both components better than if a
consumer were to apply the insect
repellent product and the sunscreen
product sequentially.
EPA is responsible for reevaluating
previously registered pesticide products
through a program called
‘‘reregistration.’’ In order to reregister a
pesticide, EPA determines whether the
product meets current scientific and
statutory standards. Due to concerns
about the potential conflict in labeling
for the insect repellent and the
sunscreen portions of the product, EPA
postponed a reregistration eligibility
decision (RED) on whether to reregister
the combination DEET/sunscreen
products until additional information
could be obtained. This document
solicits opinion and comment from the
public to assist in determining how best
to regulate these products.
These combination products are
regulated by both EPA and FDA. EPA
has regulatory authority over these
products because of the insect repellent
component and the sunscreen
component is regulated by FDA. Both
agencies are seeking comments to
determine how these products should
be regulated. (FDA’s notice is located
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.) EPA and FDA will work
together to develop a coordinated
approach to the regulation of
combination products.
1. Regulatory status of the insect
repellent ingredients. EPA provides
information to the public regarding the
use of insect repellent products at the
following web site: https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/factsheets/chemicals/deet.
htm . Information detailed at that site
provides the EPA-recommended
precautions when using insect
repellents, including (in part):
• Read and follow all directions and
precautions on the product label.
• Do not apply over cuts, wounds, or
irritated skin.
• Do not apply to hands or near eyes
and mouth of young children.
• Do not allow young children to
apply repellent products.
• Use just enough repellent to cover
exposed skin and/or clothing.
• Do not use under clothing.
• Avoid over-application.
• After returning indoors, wash
treated skin with soap and water.
• Wash treated clothing before
wearing it again.
• Use may cause skin reactions in rare
cases.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
The following additional statements
should appear on the labels of aerosol
and pump spray formulation labels:
• Do not spray in enclosed areas.
• To apply to face, spray on hands
first and then rub on face. Do not spray
directly onto face.
There are currently three (3) insect
repellent active ingredients used in
combination with sunscreen (amounting
to 20 currently registered combination
products). These are: N,N-diethyl-metatoluamide (DEET), oil of citronella and
IR3535. Two other active ingredients are
approved for use in insect repellent
products, p-methane-3,8-diol and KBR
3023 (picaridin). Neither chemical,
however, is currently available in a
combination sunscreen formulation.
Both DEET and oil of citronella have
undergone reregistration which entailed
an evaluation and analysis of the
complete database for both chemicals.
IR3535, picaridin, and p-methane-3,8diol are newly registered chemicals
which were evaluated during the
registration process to ensure they met
the statutory standard.
In December 1998, EPA completed
reregistration and issued a
Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED)
document for the pesticide DEET. DEET
products, which are applied directly to
skin and/or clothing, are available in
numerous formulation types (e.g.,
aerosol sprays, non-aerosol sprays,
creams, lotions, sticks, foams, and
towelettes) and concentrations
(products range from 4% active
ingredient (a.i.) to 100% a.i.. DEET is an
insect and mite repellent used in
households/domestic dwellings, on the
human body and on clothing, on cats,
dogs and horses and in the living and
sleeping quarters of pets.
Based on pesticide usage information
mainly for 1990 (DEET RED), an average
annual estimate of the domestic usage of
DEET is 4 million pounds (active
ingredient). About 30% of the U.S.
population uses DEET as an insect
repellent at least once a year (about 27%
of adult males, 31% of adult females
and 34% of children). Approximately
21% of U.S. households use DEET
annually. About 19% of households use
DEET on household members, and
about 4% of households that have cats
and/or dogs use DEET on those pets
(DEET RED).
As EPA indicated in the DEET RED:
‘‘The Agency is concerned about
consumer use of products that combine
sunscreen and DEET, since the
directions to reapply sunscreens
generously and frequently may promote
greater use of DEET than needed for
pesticidal efficacy, and thus pose
unnecessary exposure to DEET’’. DEET
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
labels currently recommend that
products be used sparingly and not be
reapplied too often. Sunscreen products,
however, recommend frequent
reapplication. No benefits attach to use
of DEET more frequently than necessary
to achieve its purpose. The Agency did
not make a regulatory decision about
whether to reregister these combination
products at the time of the DEET RED
because EPA believed that adequate
information was not available.
In February 1997, the EPA completed
its Reregistration Eligibility Decision
(RED) document for oil of citronella.
This decision includes a comprehensive
reassessment of the required target data
and the use patterns of currently
registered products. Oil of citronella is
a biochemical pesticide. It is registered
as an animal repellent and as an insect
repellent/feeding depressant. Oil of
citronella is the volatile oil obtained
from the steam distillation of freshly cut
or partially dried grasses (Cymbopogon
nardus (Rendal) and Cymbopogon
winterianus (Jowitt). Two varieties of the
citronella oil exist commercially –
‘‘Ceylon type’’ (derived from C. nardus)
and ‘‘Java type’’ (derived from C.
winterianus). (Oil of Citronella RED, 02/
97)
Based on pesticide survey usage
information for the years 1991 through
1992, annual citronella domestic usage
ranged approximately from 33,000 to
48,000 pounds active ingredient for four
sites (domestic dwelling; ornamentals;
human face, skin, and clothing; and
manufacturing). Oil of citronella is an
insect repellent with its largest markets,
in terms of total pounds active
ingredient, allocated to human face,
skin, and clothing (56% to 74%);
domestic dwelling outdoor (22% to
41%); and ornamentals (1.5% to 2.0%).
The balance is for manufacturing use.
(Oil of Citronella RED)
The third currently registered insect
repellent used in combination with
sunscreen is IR3535. In 1997, the
Agency classified IR3535 as a
biochemical, based on facts that:
i. It is functionally identical to
naturally occurring beta alanine;
ii. Both repel insects;
iii. The basic molecular structure is
identical;
iv. The end groups are not likely to
contribute to toxicity; and
v. It acts to control the target pest via
a non-toxic mode of action.
The active ingredient, IR3535 is a liquid
synthetic biochemical pesticide which
contains 98% 3 [N Butyl N acetyl]
aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester as
active ingredient and 2.00% inert
ingredients. (Biopesticide Registration
Eligibility Document)
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7981
Two insect repellent active
ingredients in registered pesticides are
not currently utilized in a combination
product. However, for the purposes of
completeness, all currently registered
insect repellents are discussed within
this Notice. The first chemical is pmethane-3,8-diol, a biochemical
pesticide which is chemically
synthesized, although a natural oil
comparable to p-methane-3,8-diol can
be extracted from lemon eucalyptus
leaves and twigs. It can be used in three
types of consumer pesticide products: A
spray, a lotion, and a towellette. pmethane-3,8-diol can be used to make
products that are used for the purpose
of repelling insects such as mosquitoes.
(Biopesticide Registration Eligibility
Document). The other insect repellent is
KBR 3023, containing the active
ingredient, picaridin. This chemical is
currently formulated for use as a human
skin applied insect repellent. Currently
EPA-registered picaridin products
include 15% pump spray, 10% aerosol
spray, 7% cream, 7% pump spray, 5%
cream, and 5% pump spray.
2. Regulatory Status of the Sunscreen
Ingredients. In the Federal Register of
May 21, 1999 (64 FR 27666), FDA
issued a final monograph for over-thecounter (OTC) sunscreen drug products
in 21 CFR part 352, establishing
conditions under which these products
are generally recognized as safe and
effective and not misbranded. The
monograph includes 16 sunscreen
active ingredients in § 352.10, provides
for combinations of sunscreen active
ingredients in § 353.20, specifies
required labeling in §§ 352.50, 352.52
and 352.60, and sets forth required
testing procedures in §§ 352.70 through
352.77.
Historically, FDA has used its
enforcement discretion to allow the
marketing of appropriate insect
repellent-sunscreen combination
products. These types of products were
marketed before the OTC drug review
began in 1972, and FDA has not
explicitly addressed them at any time in
the rulemaking for OTC sunscreen drug
products. Because they have always
contained a pesticide, the combination
insect repellent-sunscreen products
have also historically been registered
with and regulated by EPA. FDA has not
objected to the marketing of the
combination products pending the
issuance of the final sunscreen
monograph so long as the products
contained sunscreen ingredients
included in the FDA rulemaking and
were registered with EPA. FDA is
interested in determining whether it
should amend that monograph to
address these combination products
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
7982
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
before the monograph becomes
effective. Any combination product
containing an active drug ingredient
that is not included in the final
monograph after the effective date will
be considered a new drug and need a
new drug approval (NDA) approval to
be legally marketed, even if the product
is also registered with EPA.
III. Issues Related to Insect RepellentSunscreen Drug Products
EPA and FDA have identified three
broad issues areas in connection with
the regulation of these combination
products:
A. Possible Manufacturing Conflicts
Any insect repellent/sunscreen
combination product would have to
comply with EPA’s data requirements in
40 CFR part 158 and with FDA’s current
good manufacturing practice for
finished pharmaceuticals requirements
in 21 CFR part 211. The Agencies are
not aware of any specific manufacturing
requirements that conflict and invite
specific comment and information on
this subject.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
B. Possible Formulation Conflicts
The EPA has solicited information
from registrants of combination insect
repellent/sunscreen products regarding
the possibility of formulation conflicts.
The Agency is aware of some limited,
conflicting information, which raises
the question of whether combining a
sunscreen and an insect repellent
component in a single product
diminishes the efficacy of either the
sunscreen or the insect repellent.
Specific comments and information are
invited on this subject.
C. Possible Labeling Conflicts
Insect repellent/sunscreen products
can have labeling requirements for their
individual components that could
theoretically conflict. The insect
repellent component of the product
must be labeled in accordance with 40
CFR part 156 and should comply with
directions set out in its registration
notice or the RED for the appropriate
active ingredient. For each registered
insect repellent, these requirements are
listed in the registration or reregistration
documents. The sunscreen component
of the product must be labeled in accord
with 21 CFR 201.66, 352.50, 352.52, and
352.60. The labeling format and some of
the content requirements could vary
between the EPA and FDA
requirements. The Agency is looking at
whether it is possible for products to
comply with both sets of requirements
and recommendations without
confusing or misleading users.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Specific Topics for Comment
The EPA is particularly interested in
receiving comments on the following
topics:
A. Safety Issues
1. Application frequency. The EPA is
concerned that the combination
products could contain conflicting use
instructions on product labels which
compromise safe use of these products.
For example, the directions for some
DEET products require a 6–hour interval
between applications and state ‘‘use just
enough repellent to cover exposed skin
and/or clothing’’ and ‘‘avoid overapplication of this product’’. The
directions for sunscreen drug products
in § 352.52(d)(1) and (d)(2) state to
‘‘apply (select ‘liberally’, ‘generously’,
‘smoothly’, or ‘evenly’), before sun
exposure and as needed,’’ and ‘‘reapply
as needed or after towel drying,
swimming, or (select ‘sweating’ or
‘perspiring’)’’. EPA is soliciting
suggestions on how this potential
concern can be alleviated.
2. Application location. The EPA has
directed that insect repellents not be
used for certain areas of the body (e.g.,
over cuts, applied by spray directly to
the face, etc.), and apply sparingly
around ears. Sunscreen use directions,
however, encourage consumers to apply
the products, on the face and ears,
‘‘liberally, generously, smoothly, or
evenly’’ ‘‘before sun exposure and as
needed,’’ and ‘‘reapply as needed or
after towel drying, swimming, or (select
‘sweating’ or ‘perspiring’).’’ EPA is
soliciting comment on how the safety
concern of a potential misapplication of
the insect repellent can be reconciled
with the need to provide complete
coverage of exposed skin for the
sunscreen component.
3. Federal Fungicide and Rodentide
Act (FIFRA) registration. Given the
aforementioned safety concerns and
potential conflicts, the Agency would
like to solicit comments on whether
these insect repellent-sunscreen
combination products should be
registered at all.
B. Effectiveness Issues
For some products, there are
effectiveness concerns because of the
interval of time required between
applications of the product. EPA
identifies reapplication times on
product labels so consumers maintain
protection against insect bites, while
avoiding over-exposure. This
reapplication time relates to the
effectiveness of the insect repellent
portion of the product, not to the
sunscreen protection. The sunscreen
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reapplication time is under the purview
of the FDA. For some of the insect
repellent products currently registered,
the recommended reapplication time to
maintain the effectiveness of the insect
repellent could potentially be longer
than that recommended to ensure the
protectiveness of the sunscreen portion
of the product. EPA is soliciting
comment on the following questions:
1. Is it possible to formulate these
products such that the insect repellent
protection time coincides with the
sunscreen protection time?
2. Are there effective concentrations
of the insect repellent ingredients that
could be used to allow for liberal
application and frequent reapplication
of the insect repellent-sunscreen
combination products, as directed by
the sunscreen instructions, without
causing unnecessary exposure of the
consumer to the insect repellent
component of the product?
3. Is information available to
demonstrate that there are any chemical
or physical incompatibilities between
insect repellents and sunscreen active
ingredients when used separately? If so,
how does this vary by the insect
repellent component or by the
sunscreen component? Please submit
and/or summarize any information that
you reference.
4. Are there some product
performance benefits derived from the
purposeful combination of the insect
repellent and the sunscreen ingredients
(as opposed to the sequential
application of these products
separately). What information is
available which would help frame the
advantages or disadvantages of these
formulation combinations? How does
this vary by insect repellent? Please
submit and/or summarize any
information that you reference.
C. Manufacturing, Registration and
Testing Issues
1. Are manufacturers of the insect
repellent/sunscreen combination
products aware of any conflicts in the
EPA and FDA manufacturing
requirements? If yes, please identify and
propose a way to resolve the conflict.
2. As it relates to potential future
regulatory action taken with regard to
these products, how should currently
registered products be addressed?
Should these products have to meet all
of the requirements that result from the
current EPA-FDA joint regulatory effort
to retain their registrations? If not, what
requirements should be retained,
revised or eliminated?
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
D. Labeling Issues
1. There are many differences
between the labeling requirements
required by FDA’s OTC drug labeling
requirements and EPA’s pesticide
labeling requirements. For example, the
formats and the order in which
information is presented are quite
different. FDA allows the use of the
word ‘‘warning’’ on labels; however it is
only allowed as an indicator of toxicity
level on pesticide labels. Various
required section headings are different.
Please comment on how such labeling
differences can be reconciled.
2. FDA ingredient statements list the
‘‘inactive or inert’’ ingredients more
often and in greater detail than do EPA
approved labels. The Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) does not require the listing
of the identities of inert ingredients on
the label. Are there ways to provide the
insect repellent inert ingredients
information in the product’s labeling to
satisfy the drug requirements of the
FFDCA?
3. Is it desirable for users of these
products to have a single integrated
label, or would an insect repellent (EPA)
and a sunscreen (FDA) section in the
product’s labeling be preferable?
4. Should the insect repellent/
sunscreen combination products be
required to have a statement on the front
panel of the label specifically
identifying the product as containing an
insect repellent (such as, This Product
Contains An Insect Repellent)? Would
this be useful to help consumers
distinguish between sunscreen products
that contain pesticides from the typical
sunscreen drug products that contain no
pesticides?
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Intergovernmental relations, Pesticides,
Pests.
Dated: February 13, 2007.
James B. Gulliford,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. E7–3008 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Docket# EPA–RO4–SFUND–2007–0129;
FRL–8279–3]
Starmet CMI; Barnwell, Barnwell
County, SC; Notice of Settlement
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
ACTION:
Notice of settlement.
SUMMARY: Under Section 122(g) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA), the United States
Environmental Protection Agency has
entered into a settlement for
reimbursement of past response costs
with the Alaron Corporation concerning
the Starmet CMI Superfund Site located
in Barnwell, Barnwell County, South
Carolina.
The Agency will consider public
comments on the settlement until March
26, 2007. The Agency will consider all
comments received and may modify or
withdraw its consent to the settlement
if comments received disclose facts or
considerations which indicate that the
settlement is inappropriate, improper,
or inadequate.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are
available from Ms. Paula V. Batchelor.
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–RO4–SFUND–2007–
0129 or Site name Starmet CMI
Superfund Site by one of the following
methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Batchelor.Paula@epa.gov
• Fax: 404/562–8842/Attn Paula V.
Batchelor
Mail: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S.
EPA Region 4, WMD–SEIMB, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. ‘‘In
addition, please mail a copy of your
comments on the information collection
provisions to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Attn:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.’’
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–SFUND–2007–
0129. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your eDATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7983
mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the U.S. EPA Region 4 office located at
61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303. Regional office is open from 7
a.m. until 6:30 p.m.. Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays.
Written comments may be submitted
to Ms. Batchelor within 30 calendar
days of the date of this publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula V. Batchelor at 404/562–8887.
Dated: February 7, 2007.
Rosalind H. Brown,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information
Management Branch, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. E7–3014 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2003–0079; FRL–OW–8280–
2]
Aquatic Life Ambient Freshwater
Quality Criteria—Copper 2007 Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) announces the
availability of the 2007 revised
recommended aquatic life ambient
freshwater quality criteria for copper.
The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7979-7983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3008]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0087; FRL-8114-6]
Insect Repellent-Sunscreen Combination Products; Request for
Information and Comments
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is seeking information to determine how insect repellent-
sunscreen combination products should be regulated in order to complete
the reregistration review which was described in the Reregistration
Eligibility Decision (RED) document for the insect repellent DEET. This
action would consider issues such as labeling, product performance and
applicable safety standards for all currently (and any future)
registered insect repellent-sunscreen combination products. The
sunscreen components of these products are regulated by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA). Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register is a companion notice in which the FDA is also requesting
information and comments on these products and for which the FDA will
be considering rulemaking. The decision on what if any change in the
way these products are regulated will consider information and comments
submitted in response to this Notice.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0087, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-0087. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically
[[Page 7980]]
captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of operation
of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Gebken, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 305-6701; fax number: (703) 308-0029; e-mail address:
gebken.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to those who currently have registered products
or intend in the future to register any insect repellent-sunscreen
combination products, as well as those individuals who use these
products. Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has
not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date, and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
Currently, there are approximately 20 combination insect repellent/
sunscreen products available for consumers. Each of these products
contains an insect repellent component (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide
(DEET), oil of citronella or IR3535)) and a sunscreen component.
Combination products are available in lotion, cream, and spray-on
formulations. These products are currently marketed for use by the
entire family. These products provide consumers with the convenience of
using one product as opposed to the use of multiple products. In
addition, it has been suggested that these products, containing both
insect repellent and sunscreen components in one formulation, preserve
the efficacy of both components better than if a consumer were to apply
the insect repellent product and the sunscreen product sequentially.
EPA is responsible for reevaluating previously registered pesticide
products through a program called ``reregistration.'' In order to
reregister a pesticide, EPA determines whether the product meets
current scientific and statutory standards. Due to concerns about the
potential conflict in labeling for the insect repellent and the
sunscreen portions of the product, EPA postponed a reregistration
eligibility decision (RED) on whether to reregister the combination
DEET/sunscreen products until additional information could be obtained.
This document solicits opinion and comment from the public to assist in
determining how best to regulate these products.
These combination products are regulated by both EPA and FDA. EPA
has regulatory authority over these products because of the insect
repellent component and the sunscreen component is regulated by FDA.
Both agencies are seeking comments to determine how these products
should be regulated. (FDA's notice is located elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register.) EPA and FDA will work together to develop a
coordinated approach to the regulation of combination products.
1. Regulatory status of the insect repellent ingredients. EPA
provides information to the public regarding the use of insect
repellent products at the following web site: https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/factsheets/chemicals/deet.htm . Information detailed at that
site provides the EPA-recommended precautions when using insect
repellents, including (in part):
Read and follow all directions and precautions on the
product label.
Do not apply over cuts, wounds, or irritated skin.
Do not apply to hands or near eyes and mouth of young
children.
Do not allow young children to apply repellent products.
Use just enough repellent to cover exposed skin and/or
clothing.
Do not use under clothing.
Avoid over-application.
After returning indoors, wash treated skin with soap and
water.
Wash treated clothing before wearing it again.
Use may cause skin reactions in rare cases.
[[Page 7981]]
The following additional statements should appear on the labels of
aerosol and pump spray formulation labels:
Do not spray in enclosed areas.
To apply to face, spray on hands first and then rub on
face. Do not spray directly onto face.
There are currently three (3) insect repellent active ingredients
used in combination with sunscreen (amounting to 20 currently
registered combination products). These are: N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide
(DEET), oil of citronella and IR3535. Two other active ingredients are
approved for use in insect repellent products, p-methane-3,8-diol and
KBR 3023 (picaridin). Neither chemical, however, is currently available
in a combination sunscreen formulation. Both DEET and oil of citronella
have undergone reregistration which entailed an evaluation and analysis
of the complete database for both chemicals. IR3535, picaridin, and p-
methane-3,8-diol are newly registered chemicals which were evaluated
during the registration process to ensure they met the statutory
standard.
In December 1998, EPA completed reregistration and issued a
Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) document for the pesticide
DEET. DEET products, which are applied directly to skin and/or
clothing, are available in numerous formulation types (e.g., aerosol
sprays, non-aerosol sprays, creams, lotions, sticks, foams, and
towelettes) and concentrations (products range from 4% active
ingredient (a.i.) to 100% a.i.. DEET is an insect and mite repellent
used in households/domestic dwellings, on the human body and on
clothing, on cats, dogs and horses and in the living and sleeping
quarters of pets.
Based on pesticide usage information mainly for 1990 (DEET RED), an
average annual estimate of the domestic usage of DEET is 4 million
pounds (active ingredient). About 30% of the U.S. population uses DEET
as an insect repellent at least once a year (about 27% of adult males,
31% of adult females and 34% of children). Approximately 21% of U.S.
households use DEET annually. About 19% of households use DEET on
household members, and about 4% of households that have cats and/or
dogs use DEET on those pets (DEET RED).
As EPA indicated in the DEET RED: ``The Agency is concerned about
consumer use of products that combine sunscreen and DEET, since the
directions to reapply sunscreens generously and frequently may promote
greater use of DEET than needed for pesticidal efficacy, and thus pose
unnecessary exposure to DEET''. DEET labels currently recommend that
products be used sparingly and not be reapplied too often. Sunscreen
products, however, recommend frequent reapplication. No benefits attach
to use of DEET more frequently than necessary to achieve its purpose.
The Agency did not make a regulatory decision about whether to
reregister these combination products at the time of the DEET RED
because EPA believed that adequate information was not available.
In February 1997, the EPA completed its Reregistration Eligibility
Decision (RED) document for oil of citronella. This decision includes a
comprehensive reassessment of the required target data and the use
patterns of currently registered products. Oil of citronella is a
biochemical pesticide. It is registered as an animal repellent and as
an insect repellent/feeding depressant. Oil of citronella is the
volatile oil obtained from the steam distillation of freshly cut or
partially dried grasses (Cymbopogon nardus (Rendal) and Cymbopogon
winterianus (Jowitt). Two varieties of the citronella oil exist
commercially - ``Ceylon type'' (derived from C. nardus) and ``Java
type'' (derived from C. winterianus). (Oil of Citronella RED, 02/97)
Based on pesticide survey usage information for the years 1991
through 1992, annual citronella domestic usage ranged approximately
from 33,000 to 48,000 pounds active ingredient for four sites (domestic
dwelling; ornamentals; human face, skin, and clothing; and
manufacturing). Oil of citronella is an insect repellent with its
largest markets, in terms of total pounds active ingredient, allocated
to human face, skin, and clothing (56% to 74%); domestic dwelling
outdoor (22% to 41%); and ornamentals (1.5% to 2.0%). The balance is
for manufacturing use. (Oil of Citronella RED)
The third currently registered insect repellent used in combination
with sunscreen is IR3535. In 1997, the Agency classified IR3535 as a
biochemical, based on facts that:
i. It is functionally identical to naturally occurring beta
alanine;
ii. Both repel insects;
iii. The basic molecular structure is identical;
iv. The end groups are not likely to contribute to toxicity; and
v. It acts to control the target pest via a non-toxic mode of
action.
The active ingredient, IR3535 is a liquid synthetic biochemical
pesticide which contains 98% 3 [N Butyl N acetyl] aminopropionic acid,
ethyl ester as active ingredient and 2.00% inert ingredients.
(Biopesticide Registration Eligibility Document)
Two insect repellent active ingredients in registered pesticides
are not currently utilized in a combination product. However, for the
purposes of completeness, all currently registered insect repellents
are discussed within this Notice. The first chemical is p-methane-3,8-
diol, a biochemical pesticide which is chemically synthesized, although
a natural oil comparable to p-methane-3,8-diol can be extracted from
lemon eucalyptus leaves and twigs. It can be used in three types of
consumer pesticide products: A spray, a lotion, and a towellette. p-
methane-3,8-diol can be used to make products that are used for the
purpose of repelling insects such as mosquitoes. (Biopesticide
Registration Eligibility Document). The other insect repellent is KBR
3023, containing the active ingredient, picaridin. This chemical is
currently formulated for use as a human skin applied insect repellent.
Currently EPA-registered picaridin products include 15% pump spray, 10%
aerosol spray, 7% cream, 7% pump spray, 5% cream, and 5% pump spray.
2. Regulatory Status of the Sunscreen Ingredients. In the Federal
Register of May 21, 1999 (64 FR 27666), FDA issued a final monograph
for over-the-counter (OTC) sunscreen drug products in 21 CFR part 352,
establishing conditions under which these products are generally
recognized as safe and effective and not misbranded. The monograph
includes 16 sunscreen active ingredients in Sec. 352.10, provides for
combinations of sunscreen active ingredients in Sec. 353.20, specifies
required labeling in Sec. Sec. 352.50, 352.52 and 352.60, and sets
forth required testing procedures in Sec. Sec. 352.70 through 352.77.
Historically, FDA has used its enforcement discretion to allow the
marketing of appropriate insect repellent-sunscreen combination
products. These types of products were marketed before the OTC drug
review began in 1972, and FDA has not explicitly addressed them at any
time in the rulemaking for OTC sunscreen drug products. Because they
have always contained a pesticide, the combination insect repellent-
sunscreen products have also historically been registered with and
regulated by EPA. FDA has not objected to the marketing of the
combination products pending the issuance of the final sunscreen
monograph so long as the products contained sunscreen ingredients
included in the FDA rulemaking and were registered with EPA. FDA is
interested in determining whether it should amend that monograph to
address these combination products
[[Page 7982]]
before the monograph becomes effective. Any combination product
containing an active drug ingredient that is not included in the final
monograph after the effective date will be considered a new drug and
need a new drug approval (NDA) approval to be legally marketed, even if
the product is also registered with EPA.
III. Issues Related to Insect Repellent-Sunscreen Drug Products
EPA and FDA have identified three broad issues areas in connection
with the regulation of these combination products:
A. Possible Manufacturing Conflicts
Any insect repellent/sunscreen combination product would have to
comply with EPA's data requirements in 40 CFR part 158 and with FDA's
current good manufacturing practice for finished pharmaceuticals
requirements in 21 CFR part 211. The Agencies are not aware of any
specific manufacturing requirements that conflict and invite specific
comment and information on this subject.
B. Possible Formulation Conflicts
The EPA has solicited information from registrants of combination
insect repellent/sunscreen products regarding the possibility of
formulation conflicts. The Agency is aware of some limited, conflicting
information, which raises the question of whether combining a sunscreen
and an insect repellent component in a single product diminishes the
efficacy of either the sunscreen or the insect repellent. Specific
comments and information are invited on this subject.
C. Possible Labeling Conflicts
Insect repellent/sunscreen products can have labeling requirements
for their individual components that could theoretically conflict. The
insect repellent component of the product must be labeled in accordance
with 40 CFR part 156 and should comply with directions set out in its
registration notice or the RED for the appropriate active ingredient.
For each registered insect repellent, these requirements are listed in
the registration or reregistration documents. The sunscreen component
of the product must be labeled in accord with 21 CFR 201.66, 352.50,
352.52, and 352.60. The labeling format and some of the content
requirements could vary between the EPA and FDA requirements. The
Agency is looking at whether it is possible for products to comply with
both sets of requirements and recommendations without confusing or
misleading users.
IV. Specific Topics for Comment
The EPA is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
following topics:
A. Safety Issues
1. Application frequency. The EPA is concerned that the combination
products could contain conflicting use instructions on product labels
which compromise safe use of these products. For example, the
directions for some DEET products require a 6-hour interval between
applications and state ``use just enough repellent to cover exposed
skin and/or clothing'' and ``avoid over-application of this product''.
The directions for sunscreen drug products in Sec. 352.52(d)(1) and
(d)(2) state to ``apply (select `liberally', `generously', `smoothly',
or `evenly'), before sun exposure and as needed,'' and ``reapply as
needed or after towel drying, swimming, or (select `sweating' or
`perspiring')''. EPA is soliciting suggestions on how this potential
concern can be alleviated.
2. Application location. The EPA has directed that insect
repellents not be used for certain areas of the body (e.g., over cuts,
applied by spray directly to the face, etc.), and apply sparingly
around ears. Sunscreen use directions, however, encourage consumers to
apply the products, on the face and ears, ``liberally, generously,
smoothly, or evenly'' ``before sun exposure and as needed,'' and
``reapply as needed or after towel drying, swimming, or (select
`sweating' or `perspiring').'' EPA is soliciting comment on how the
safety concern of a potential misapplication of the insect repellent
can be reconciled with the need to provide complete coverage of exposed
skin for the sunscreen component.
3. Federal Fungicide and Rodentide Act (FIFRA) registration. Given
the aforementioned safety concerns and potential conflicts, the Agency
would like to solicit comments on whether these insect repellent-
sunscreen combination products should be registered at all.
B. Effectiveness Issues
For some products, there are effectiveness concerns because of the
interval of time required between applications of the product. EPA
identifies reapplication times on product labels so consumers maintain
protection against insect bites, while avoiding over-exposure. This
reapplication time relates to the effectiveness of the insect repellent
portion of the product, not to the sunscreen protection. The sunscreen
reapplication time is under the purview of the FDA. For some of the
insect repellent products currently registered, the recommended
reapplication time to maintain the effectiveness of the insect
repellent could potentially be longer than that recommended to ensure
the protectiveness of the sunscreen portion of the product. EPA is
soliciting comment on the following questions:
1. Is it possible to formulate these products such that the insect
repellent protection time coincides with the sunscreen protection time?
2. Are there effective concentrations of the insect repellent
ingredients that could be used to allow for liberal application and
frequent reapplication of the insect repellent-sunscreen combination
products, as directed by the sunscreen instructions, without causing
unnecessary exposure of the consumer to the insect repellent component
of the product?
3. Is information available to demonstrate that there are any
chemical or physical incompatibilities between insect repellents and
sunscreen active ingredients when used separately? If so, how does this
vary by the insect repellent component or by the sunscreen component?
Please submit and/or summarize any information that you reference.
4. Are there some product performance benefits derived from the
purposeful combination of the insect repellent and the sunscreen
ingredients (as opposed to the sequential application of these products
separately). What information is available which would help frame the
advantages or disadvantages of these formulation combinations? How does
this vary by insect repellent? Please submit and/or summarize any
information that you reference.
C. Manufacturing, Registration and Testing Issues
1. Are manufacturers of the insect repellent/sunscreen combination
products aware of any conflicts in the EPA and FDA manufacturing
requirements? If yes, please identify and propose a way to resolve the
conflict.
2. As it relates to potential future regulatory action taken with
regard to these products, how should currently registered products be
addressed? Should these products have to meet all of the requirements
that result from the current EPA-FDA joint regulatory effort to retain
their registrations? If not, what requirements should be retained,
revised or eliminated?
[[Page 7983]]
D. Labeling Issues
1. There are many differences between the labeling requirements
required by FDA's OTC drug labeling requirements and EPA's pesticide
labeling requirements. For example, the formats and the order in which
information is presented are quite different. FDA allows the use of the
word ``warning'' on labels; however it is only allowed as an indicator
of toxicity level on pesticide labels. Various required section
headings are different. Please comment on how such labeling differences
can be reconciled.
2. FDA ingredient statements list the ``inactive or inert''
ingredients more often and in greater detail than do EPA approved
labels. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
does not require the listing of the identities of inert ingredients on
the label. Are there ways to provide the insect repellent inert
ingredients information in the product's labeling to satisfy the drug
requirements of the FFDCA?
3. Is it desirable for users of these products to have a single
integrated label, or would an insect repellent (EPA) and a sunscreen
(FDA) section in the product's labeling be preferable?
4. Should the insect repellent/sunscreen combination products be
required to have a statement on the front panel of the label
specifically identifying the product as containing an insect repellent
(such as, This Product Contains An Insect Repellent)? Would this be
useful to help consumers distinguish between sunscreen products that
contain pesticides from the typical sunscreen drug products that
contain no pesticides?
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Intergovernmental relations, Pesticides, Pests.
Dated: February 13, 2007.
James B. Gulliford,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
[FR Doc. E7-3008 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S