Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration, 8017-8018 [E7-2991]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
and Lehigh Dairies up in the northeast. Most
anyone would be a perfect partner for an easy
and quick $17,000,000.
After the deal was complete and DFA and
good ole Bob took over Southern Belle, good
ole Bob almost immediately began laying the
groundwork to give the SEGMPA two
wonderful options:
1.) Become a DFA producer or
2.) Go fly a kite.
It was also apparent soon after Bob took
over that he needed someone to be his yes
man because Martin Shearer just did not fit
the bill. The yes man suddenly appeared
* * * why, it’s Mike Chandler right out of
the sales department. Mike is the kind of guy
that gives all salespeople a bad name. People
say he would climb a tree to tell a lie.
However, he was lacking when it came to
speech because he couldn’t say shit with a
mouthful. Now this is where DOJ gets a well
deserved Pat On The Back. Much to the
surprise of DFA and good ole Bob, DOJ filed
a lawsuit asking DFA to divest itself of its
ownership in Southern Belle. Good ole Bob
had to put the brakes on his plan. After all,
it wouldn’t look good if he sent Martin
Shearer home and kicked the producers right
between the legs, at least not right now. DFA
and good ole Bob put up a good fight and
finally finagled a judge into giving them a
Summary Judgment. Good ole Bob must have
known he was going to get it, as he sent
Martin Shearer home before the Summary
Judgment was made public and he put his
yes man in place. When the Summary
Judgment in favor of DFA and good ole Bob
was made public, celebrations broke out to
honor the victory over DOJ. After all, who is
the DOJ that would question DFA and the
perfect partner, good ole Bob.
Here is another well-deserved Pat-On The
Back for DOJ. You didn’t quit. DOJ filed an
appeal. The judge who was tricked by DFA
and good ole Bob had his decision
overturned. This really made DFA and good
ole Bob mad. But what could they do? * * *
Give up and agree to sell it and quickly find
someone to move it to that would finish the
job for them. Why after going to great and
expensive lengths to keep Prairie Farms from
owning Southern Belle do they quickly sell
it to them without even giving one group a
chance to make a proposal? I know opinions
are like assholes; every body has one. Here’s
my opinion—Whatever Prairie Farms might
have given will be returned to them in some
way, probably in credits toward raw milk
purchases, making the price tag this time
around $00. plus keep lying Mike Chandler
in charge to oversee DFA’s best interests of
seeing SEGMPA die a slow but sure death.
At last, mission accomplished for DFA.
Please do whatever it takes to see Southern
Belle end up in the hands of someone who
has (zero) connection to DFA. Thanks for
listening.
A very concerned citizen
P.S. Something else you may need to take
a look at. Remember the children and
families and taxpayers you were trying to
protect when you made the new Dean spin
off those plants.
1.) The one in northern Alabama that
needed to give Dean competition; you may
not know but it’s gone. Dean has North
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
Alabama schools all to themselves now. Poor
children.
2.) The one in Virginia that was supposed
to give Dean competition in parts of Virginia;
you may not know but it’s gone. Poor
children.
3.) The one in Indiana that was supposed
to give Dean competition; you may not know
it but it’s gone. Poor children.
You might ought to watch the rest that
were spun off because some of them may
soon disappear as well.
Thanks again for listening.
[FR Doc. 07–709 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Importer of Controlled Substances;
Notice of Application
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the
Attorney General shall, prior to issuing
a registration under this Section to a
bulk manufacturer of a controlled
substance in schedule I or II and prior
to issuing a regulation under 21 U.S.C.
§ 952(a)(2)(B) authorizing the
importation of such a substance,
provide manufacturers holding
registrations for the bulk manufacture of
the substance an opportunity for a
hearing.
Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR
1301.34(a), this is notice that on
November 27, 2005, Cambrex Charles
City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City,
Iowa 50616, made application by
renewal to the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) to be registered as
an importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a
basic class of controlled substance listed
in schedule II.
The company plans to import
Phenylacetone for use as a precursor in
the manufacture of amphetamines only.
Any bulk manufacturer who is
presently, or is applying to be,
registered with DEA to manufacture
such basic class of controlled substance
may file comments or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration
and may, at the same time, file a written
request for a hearing on such
application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43
and in such form as prescribed by 21
CFR 1316.47.
Any such written comments or
objections being sent via regular mail
should be addressed, in quintuplicate,
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL; or
any being sent via express mail should
be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8017
DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be
filed no later than March 26, 2007.
This procedure is to be conducted
simultaneously with and independent
of the procedures described in 21 CFR
§ 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f). As
noted in a previous notice published in
the Federal Register on September 23,
1975, (40 FR 43745–46), all applicants
for registration to import a basic class of
any controlled substance listed in
schedule I or II are, and will continue
to be required to demonstrate to the
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, that the requirements
for such registration pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21
CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) are
satisfied.
Dated: February 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–2992 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Importer of Controlled Substances;
Notice of Registration
By Notice dated November 21, 2006
and published in the Federal Register
on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69591),
JFC Technologies LLC., 100 West Main
Street, P.O. Box 669, Bound Brook, New
Jersey 08805, made application by
renewal to the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) to be registered as
an importer of Meperidine intermediateB (9233), a basic class of controlled
substance listed in schedule II.
The company plans to import the
basic class of controlled substance for
production of controlled substances for
distribution to its customers.
No comments or objections have been
received. DEA has considered the
factors in 21 U.S.C. § 823(a) and § 952(a)
and determined that the registration of
JFC Technologies LLC to import the
basic class of controlled substance is
consistent with the public interest and
with United States obligations under
international treaties, conventions, or
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at
this time. DEA has investigated JFC
Technologies LLC to ensure that the
company’s registration is consistent
with the public interest. The
investigation has included inspection
and testing of the company’s physical
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
8018
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 35 / Thursday, February 22, 2007 / Notices
security systems, verification of the
company’s compliance with state and
local laws, and a review of the
company’s background and history.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 952(a)
and § 958(a), and in accordance with 21
CFR 1301.34, the above named company
is granted registration as an importer of
the basic class of controlled substance
listed.
Dated: February 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–2991 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
February 15, 2007.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of this
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained from
RegInfo.gov at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number)/e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Bureau
of Labor Statistics (BLS), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–7316/Fax: 202–395–6974
(these are not toll-free numbers), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Feb 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Multiple Worksite Report and
the Report of Federal Employment and
Wages.
OMB Number: 1220–0134.
Form Numbers: BLS–3020 and BLS–
3021.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Frequency: Quarterly.
Affected Public: Business or other for
profits; Not-for-profits institutions; and
Federal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
128,411.
Annual Responses: 513,644.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 190,048.
Average Burden Time per Response:
22 minutes.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: States use the Multiple
Worksite Report to collect employment
and wages data by worksite from
employers covered by State
Unemployment Insurance which are
engaged in multiple operations within a
State. These data are used for sampling,
benchmarking, and economic analysis.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–2894 Filed 2–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
February 15, 2007.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection requests (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained from
RegInfo.gov at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number) / e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–7316 / Fax: 202–395–6974
(these are not toll-free numbers), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title: Employee Benefit Plan Claims
Procedure Under ERISA.
OMB Number: 1210–0053.
Type of Response: Third party
disclosure.
Affected Public: Private Sector:
Business or other for-profits and Notfor-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,900,000.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 320,999,996.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
529,000.
Estimated Total Annualized Capital/
Startup Costs: $0.
Estimated Total Annual Costs
(operating/maintaining systems or
purchasing services): $423,051,994.
Description: Section 503 of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 and the Department’s
regulations at 29 CFR 2560.503–1
require employee benefit plans to
establish procedures for resolving
benefit claims under the plan, including
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8017-8018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2991]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration
By Notice dated November 21, 2006 and published in the Federal
Register on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69591), JFC Technologies LLC., 100
West Main Street, P.O. Box 669, Bound Brook, New Jersey 08805, made
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to
be registered as an importer of Meperidine intermediate-B (9233), a
basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
The company plans to import the basic class of controlled substance
for production of controlled substances for distribution to its
customers.
No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered
the factors in 21 U.S.C. Sec. 823(a) and Sec. 952(a) and determined
that the registration of JFC Technologies LLC to import the basic class
of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with
United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated
JFC Technologies LLC to ensure that the company's registration is
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included
inspection and testing of the company's physical
[[Page 8018]]
security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state
and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 952(a) and Sec. 958(a), and in
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted
registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance
listed.
Dated: February 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-2991 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P