Debarment Involving Henry L. Lavery III and Security Assistance International, Inc., 7811-7812 [E7-2831]
Download as PDF
7811
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Notices
Type of Request: Extension of an
OMB-approved information collection.
Number of Respondents: 250,000.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Burden Per Response: 15
minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden: 62,500
hours.
2. Request for Hearing by
Administrative Law Judge—20 CFR
404.929, 404.933, 416.1429, 404.1433,
405.722, 418.1350—0960–0269. SSA
uses form HA–501 to document when
applicants for Social Security benefits
have their claims denied and want to
request an administrative hearing to
appeal SSA’s decision. The scope of this
form is now being expanded to include
people who wish to appeal the decision
that has been made regarding their
obligation to pay a new Income-Related
Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA)
for Medicare Part B, as per the
requirements of the Medicare
Modernization Act of 2003. Although
this information will be collected by
SSA, the actual hearings will take place
before administrative law judges (ALJ)
who are employed by the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS). The
current respondents include applicants
for various Social Security benefits
programs who want to request a hearing
where they can appeal their denial; the
new additional respondents are
Medicare Part B recipients whom SSA
has determined will have to pay the
new Medicare Part B IRMAA and who
wish to appeal this decision at a hearing
before an HHS ALJ.
Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection.
Number of Respondents: 669,469.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Burden Per Response: 10
minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden: 111,578
hours.
3. Request to Resolve Questionable
Quarters of Coverage (QC); Request for
Number of
respondents
Collections
QC History Based on Relationship—
0960–0575. Form SSA–512 is used by
states to request clarification from SSA
on questionable QC information. The
Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act states
that aliens admitted for lawful residence
that have worked and earned 40
qualifying QCs for Social Security
purposes can generally receive state
benefits. Form SSA–513 is used by
states to request QC information for an
alien’s spouse or child in cases where
the alien does not sign a consent form
giving permission to access his/her
Social Security records. QCs can also be
allocated to a spouse and/or to a child
under age 18, if needed, to obtain 40
qualifying QCs for the alien. The
respondents are state agencies that
require QC information in order to
determine eligibility for benefits.
Type of Request: Extension of an
OMB-approved information collection.
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(minute)
Estimated
annual burden
(hours)
SSA–512 ..........................................................................................................
SSA–513 ..........................................................................................................
200,000
350,000
1
1
2
2
6,667
11,667
Totals ........................................................................................................
550,000
........................
........................
18,334
Dated: February 9, 2007.
Elizabeth A. Davidson,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–2662 Filed 2–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5698]
Debarment Involving Henry L. Lavery
III and Security Assistance
International, Inc.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State has imposed an
administrative debarment against Henry
L. Lavery III and Security Assistance
International, Inc. pursuant to a
December 12, 2006 Consent Agreement
and other authority based upon section
127.7(a) and (b)(2) of the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22
CFR sections 120 to 130).
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 12, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Trimble, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:14 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State (202) 663–2700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
127.7 of the ITAR authorizes the
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs to debar any person
who has been found pursuant to Section
128 of the ITAR to have committed a
violation of the Arms Export Control
Act (AECA) or the ITAR of such
character as to provide a reasonable
basis for the Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance to believe that the
violator cannot be relied upon to
comply with the AECA or ITAR in the
future. Such debarment prohibits the
subject from participating directly or
indirectly in the export of defense
articles or defense services for which a
license or approval is required by the
ITAR.
Debarred persons are generally
ineligible to participate in activity
regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
sections 120.1(c) and (d), 126.7,
127.1(c), and 127.11(a)). The
Department of State will not consider
applications for licenses or requests for
approvals that involve any debarred
person.
Henry L. Lavery III doing business as
Security Assistance International, Inc.,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(SAI) was under a Consent Agreement
dated June 3, 1999, as a result of a
Proposed Charging Letter alleging
numerous ITAR violations between
April 1993 and April 1999. Mr. Lavery
and his company, SAI, were cited for
submitting export applications on behalf
of clients containing falsified applicant
signatures; failing to maintain records as
required under the ITAR; obtaining
export licenses for firms whose
registrations expired or who were never
registered; and brokering without being
registered and without authorization.
Under the June 3, 1999, Consent
Agreement, Mr. Lavery was required to
pay a $10,000 penalty, register as a
broker, reconstruct export records, cease
participating directly or indirectly in
exports of defense articles and/or
defense services and implement a
compliance program outlining SAI’s
operating procedures and internal
controls for adherence to the ITAR. On
or about August 1, 2001, Mr. Lavery
completed the requirements of the
Consent Agreement and his export
privileges were reinstated by the
Department.
On July 11, 2005, the Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance
conducted a review of SAI’s ITAR
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
7812
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Notices
compliance program. The review
determined that many of the practices,
which led to the June 3, 1999, Consent
Agreement, had not been corrected. A
July 14, 2003 license application for the
temporary export of Night Vision
equipment was submitted by Mr. Lavery
on behalf of an unregistered company;
Mr. Lavery was unable to provide
complete records and/or was unable to
produce records required to be
maintained by the ITAR for his current
authorized exports; and Mr. Lavery
violated a license proviso requiring
proof of export be provided to the
Department.
On December 12, 2006, as the result
of these continuing violations, the
Department and Mr. Lavery entered into
a new Consent Agreement, which
debarred Mr. Lavery and SAI until
December 12, 2007. Reinstatement after
December 12, 2007 is not automatic but
contingent on full compliance with the
terms of the December 12, 2006 Consent
Agreement and evidence that the
underlying problems that gave rise to
the violations have been corrected. At
the end of the debarment period, Mr.
Lavery and SAI may apply for
reinstatement. Until licensing privileges
are reinstated, Mr. Lavery and SAI will
remain debarred.
This notice is provided to make the
public aware that the persons listed
above are prohibited from participating
directly or indirectly in any brokering
activities and in any export from or
temporary import into the United States
of defense articles, related technical
data, or defense services in all situations
covered by the ITAR.
Exceptions may be made to this
denial policy on a case-by-case basis at
the discretion of the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls. However, such
an exception would be granted only
after a full review of all circumstances,
paying particular attention to the
following factors: Whether an exception
is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign
policy or national security interests;
whether an exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are
consistent with foreign policy or
national security interests of the United
States; or whether other compelling
circumstances exist that are consistent
with the foreign policy or national
security interests of the United States,
and law enforcement concerns.
This notice involves a foreign affairs
function of the United States
encompassed within the meaning of the
military and foreign affairs exclusion of
the Administrative Procedures Act.
Because the exercise of this foreign
affairs function is highly discretionary,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:14 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
it is excluded from review under the
Administrative Procedures Act.
Dated: January 29, 2007.
Ambassador Stephen Mull,
Acting Assistant Secretary for PoliticalMilitary Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7–2831 Filed 2–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–98–4334, FMCSA–00–
7363, FMCSA–02–13411]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of renewal of
exemptions; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its
decision to renew the exemptions from
the vision requirement in the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for 15
individuals. FMCSA has statutory
authority to exempt individuals from
the vision requirement if the
exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
DATES: This decision is effective
March 4, 2007. Comments must be
received on or before March 22, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket Management
System (DMS) Docket Numbers
FMCSA–98–4334, FMCSA–00–7363,
FMCSA–02–13411, using any of the
following methods.
• Web site: https://dmses.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and docket
numbers for this Notice. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://dms.dot.gov,
including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act
heading for further information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or Room PL–
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The DMS is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
If you want us to notify you that we
received your comments, please include
a self-addressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or of the person signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the Department of
Transportation’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477; Apr. 11, 2000). This information
is also available at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
Qualifications Division, (202) 366–4001,
maggi.gunnels@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Exemption Decision
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may renew an exemption from
the vision requirements in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), which applies to drivers
of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a
two-year period if it finds ‘‘such
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption.’’ The
procedures for requesting an exemption
(including renewals) are set out in 49
CFR part 381. This notice addresses 15
individuals who have requested renewal
of their exemptions in a timely manner.
FMCSA has evaluated these 15
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7811-7812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2831]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5698]
Debarment Involving Henry L. Lavery III and Security Assistance
International, Inc.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has
imposed an administrative debarment against Henry L. Lavery III and
Security Assistance International, Inc. pursuant to a December 12, 2006
Consent Agreement and other authority based upon section 127.7(a) and
(b)(2) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR
sections 120 to 130).
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 12, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Trimble, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs, Department of State (202) 663-2700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 127.7 of the ITAR authorizes the
Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs to debar
any person who has been found pursuant to Section 128 of the ITAR to
have committed a violation of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) or the
ITAR of such character as to provide a reasonable basis for the Office
of Defense Trade Controls Compliance to believe that the violator
cannot be relied upon to comply with the AECA or ITAR in the future.
Such debarment prohibits the subject from participating directly or
indirectly in the export of defense articles or defense services for
which a license or approval is required by the ITAR.
Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in
activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d),
126.7, 127.1(c), and 127.11(a)). The Department of State will not
consider applications for licenses or requests for approvals that
involve any debarred person.
Henry L. Lavery III doing business as Security Assistance
International, Inc., (SAI) was under a Consent Agreement dated June 3,
1999, as a result of a Proposed Charging Letter alleging numerous ITAR
violations between April 1993 and April 1999. Mr. Lavery and his
company, SAI, were cited for submitting export applications on behalf
of clients containing falsified applicant signatures; failing to
maintain records as required under the ITAR; obtaining export licenses
for firms whose registrations expired or who were never registered; and
brokering without being registered and without authorization. Under the
June 3, 1999, Consent Agreement, Mr. Lavery was required to pay a
$10,000 penalty, register as a broker, reconstruct export records,
cease participating directly or indirectly in exports of defense
articles and/or defense services and implement a compliance program
outlining SAI's operating procedures and internal controls for
adherence to the ITAR. On or about August 1, 2001, Mr. Lavery completed
the requirements of the Consent Agreement and his export privileges
were reinstated by the Department.
On July 11, 2005, the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance
conducted a review of SAI's ITAR
[[Page 7812]]
compliance program. The review determined that many of the practices,
which led to the June 3, 1999, Consent Agreement, had not been
corrected. A July 14, 2003 license application for the temporary export
of Night Vision equipment was submitted by Mr. Lavery on behalf of an
unregistered company; Mr. Lavery was unable to provide complete records
and/or was unable to produce records required to be maintained by the
ITAR for his current authorized exports; and Mr. Lavery violated a
license proviso requiring proof of export be provided to the
Department.
On December 12, 2006, as the result of these continuing violations,
the Department and Mr. Lavery entered into a new Consent Agreement,
which debarred Mr. Lavery and SAI until December 12, 2007.
Reinstatement after December 12, 2007 is not automatic but contingent
on full compliance with the terms of the December 12, 2006 Consent
Agreement and evidence that the underlying problems that gave rise to
the violations have been corrected. At the end of the debarment period,
Mr. Lavery and SAI may apply for reinstatement. Until licensing
privileges are reinstated, Mr. Lavery and SAI will remain debarred.
This notice is provided to make the public aware that the persons
listed above are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly
in any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR.
Exceptions may be made to this denial policy on a case-by-case
basis at the discretion of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
However, such an exception would be granted only after a full review of
all circumstances, paying particular attention to the following
factors: Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign
policy or national security interests; whether an exception would
further law enforcement concerns that are consistent with foreign
policy or national security interests of the United States; or whether
other compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the
foreign policy or national security interests of the United States, and
law enforcement concerns.
This notice involves a foreign affairs function of the United
States encompassed within the meaning of the military and foreign
affairs exclusion of the Administrative Procedures Act. Because the
exercise of this foreign affairs function is highly discretionary, it
is excluded from review under the Administrative Procedures Act.
Dated: January 29, 2007.
Ambassador Stephen Mull,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Political-Military Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7-2831 Filed 2-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P