Premium Rates; Payment of Premiums; Flat Premium Rates, Variable-Rate Premium Cap, and Termination Premium; Deficit Reduction Act of 2005; Pension Protection Act of 2006, 7755-7762 [E7-2812]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Dated: February 14, 2007.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 07–746 Filed 2–14–07; 4:01 pm]
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington DC 20005–4026, or
calling 202–326–4040 during normal
business hours. (TTY and TDD users
may call the Federal relay service tollfree at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
H. Hanley, Director, Legislative and
Regulatory Department; or Catherine B.
Klion, Manager, or Deborah C. Murphy,
Attorney, Regulatory and Policy
Division, Legislative and Regulatory
Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW.,
Washington DC 20005–4026; 202–326–
4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4006 and 4007
RIN 1212–AB10
Premium Rates; Payment of
Premiums; Flat Premium Rates,
Variable-Rate Premium Cap, and
Termination Premium; Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005; Pension
Protection Act of 2006
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
Background
SUMMARY: This is a proposed rule to
amend PBGC’s regulations on Premium
Rates and Payment of Premiums to
implement certain provisions of the
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Pub. L.
109–171) and the Pension Protection
Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109–280) that are
effective beginning in 2006 or 2007. The
provisions that would be implemented
by this rule change the flat premium
rate, cap the variable-rate premium in
some cases, and create a new
‘‘termination premium’’ that is payable
in connection with certain distress and
involuntary plan terminations. This rule
does not address other provisions of the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 that deal
with PBGC premiums.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before April 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by
RIN number 1212–AB10, may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web
site instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: reg.comments@pbgc.gov.
• Fax: 202–326–4224.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Legislative
and Regulatory Department, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026.
All submissions must include the
Regulatory Information Number for this
rulemaking (RIN 1212-AB10).
Comments received, including personal
information provided, will be posted to
www.pbgc.gov. Copies of comments may
also be obtained by writing to
Disclosure Division, Office of the
General Counsel, Pension Benefit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
(PBGC) administers the pension plan
termination insurance program under
Title IV of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Pension plans covered by Title IV must
pay premiums to PBGC. Section 4006 of
ERISA deals with premium rates, and
section 4007 of ERISA deals with the
payment of premiums, including
premium due dates, interest and
penalties on premiums not timely paid,
and persons liable for premiums.
On February 8, 2006, the President
signed into law the Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109–171 (DRA
2005). Section 8101 of DRA 2005
amends section 4006 of ERISA. Section
8101(a) changes the per-participant flat
premium rate for plan years beginning
in 2006 from $19 to $30 for singleemployer plans and from $2.60 to $8 for
multiemployer plans and provides for
inflation adjustments to the flat rates for
future years. Section 8101(b) creates a
new ‘‘termination premium’’ (in
addition to the flat-rate and variable-rate
premiums under section 4006(a)(3)(A)
and (E) of ERISA) that is payable for
three years following certain distress
and involuntary plan terminations that
occur after 2005.
On August 17, 2006, the President
signed into law the Pension Protection
Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109–280 (PPA
2006). Sections 401(b) and 402(g)(2)(B)
of PPA 2006 make changes to the
termination premium rules of DRA
2005. Section 405 of PPA 2006 amends
section 4006 of ERISA to cap the
variable-rate premium for plans of
certain small employers beginning in
2007. (PPA 2006 also makes other
changes affecting PBGC premiums that
are not addressed in this rule.)
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7755
This rule would amend PBGC’s
regulations on Premium Rates (29 CFR
Part 4006) and Payment of Premiums
(29 CFR Part 4007) to conform to these
requirements of DRA 2005 and PPA
2006 and to clarify how the
requirements apply.
Flat-Rate Premium
Until the enactment of DRA 2005, the
flat-rate premium had remained
unchanged for single-employer plans
since 1991 and for multiemployer plans
since 1989. Section 8101(a) of DRA 2005
amends section 4006(a)(3)(A) of ERISA
and adds new subparagraphs (F) and (G)
to the end of section 4006(a)(3) of ERISA
to raise the flat premium rates for 2006
for both single- and multiemployer
plans and to provide for inflation
indexing for future years.
Applicability
Before amendment by DRA 2005,
section 4006(a)(3)(A) of ERISA provided
(in part) that ‘‘* * * the annual
premium rate * * * is * * * in the case
of a single-employer plan, for plan years
beginning after December 31, 1990, an
amount equal to the sum of $19 plus the
[per-participant variable-rate premium]
under subparagraph (E) for each * * *
participant * * *’’ Section
8101(a)(1)(A) of DRA 2005 changes
‘‘$19’’ to read ‘‘$30.’’ Thus, the amended
text of ERISA, read literally, makes it
appear that the $30 single-employer flatrate premium applies to plan years
beginning after 1990. However, section
8101(d)(1) of DRA 2005 (which does not
amend ERISA) says that this change
applies to plan years beginning after
December 31, 2005. Accordingly, PBGC
considers single-employer flat premium
rates for plan years beginning before
2006 to be unaffected by DRA 2005.
Participant Count
Section 8101(a)(2)(A)(ii) of DRA 2005
adds a new clause (iv) to section
4006(a)(3)(A) of ERISA providing that
the flat premium rate for a
multiemployer plan for a post-2005 plan
year is ‘‘$8.00 for each individual who
is a participant in such plan during the
applicable plan year.’’ PBGC interprets
this to mean that the participant count
is to be taken as of the premium
snapshot date described in the premium
rates regulation and PBGC’s premium
instructions (generally the last day of
the plan year preceding the premium
payment year). This is consistent with
PBGC’s interpretation of the nearly
identical language in existing section
4006(a)(3)(A)(i) of ERISA.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
7756
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Inflation Adjustments
Section 8101(a)(1)(B) and (2)(B) of
DRA 2005 add to section 4006(a)(3) of
ERISA substantially identical new
subparagraphs (F) and (G) providing for
inflation adjustments to the $30 and $8
flat rates for plan years beginning after
2006. The adjustments are based on
changes in the national average wage
index as defined in section 209(k)(1) of
the Social Security Act, with a two-year
lag—for example, for 2007, it will be the
2005 index that will be compared to the
baseline (the 2004 index). However,
new subparagraphs (F) and (G) are
written in such a way that the premium
rate can never go down; if the change in
the national average wage index is
negative, the premium rate remains the
same as in the preceding year. Also,
under new subparagraphs (F) and (G),
premium rates are rounded to the
nearest whole dollar. PBGC interprets
this to mean that if the adjustment
formula would produce an unrounded
premium rate of some number of dollars
plus 50 cents, the premium rate will be
rounded up.
Regulatory Provisions
This rule would amend § 4006.3 of
the premium rates regulation to reflect
the changes to the flat-rate premium
made by section 8101(a) of DRA 2005.
Existing paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of
§ 4006.3 (setting forth the $19 and $2.60
flat rates) would be removed, and a
cross-reference to new § 4006.3(c)
would be provided instead. Paragraph
(1) of new § 4006.3(c) provides pre-2006
rates ($19 and $2.60); paragraph (2)
provides 2006 rates ($30 and $8); and
paragraph (3) provides post-2006 rates
(the greater of the preceding year’s rate
or the inflation-adjusted rate). The
inflation adjustment is described in new
§ 4006.3(d).
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
Variable-Rate Premium
Section 405 of PPA 2006 amends
section 4006(a)(3)(E)(i) of ERISA and
adds new subparagraph (H) to the end
of section 4006(a)(3) to cap the variablerate premium for certain plans, effective
for plan years beginning after 2006.
Plans Covered
Clause (i) of new section 4006(a)(3)(H)
of ERISA says that the new variable-rate
premium cap applies ‘‘[i]n the case of an
employer who has 25 or fewer
employees on the first day of the plan
year.’’ But clause (ii) of new section
4006(a)(3)(H) of ERISA makes clear that
the applicability of the new cap does
not necessarily depend on the size of a
single employer, but rather depends on
the size of a plan’s controlled group,
that is, the aggregate size of ‘‘all
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
contributing sponsors and their
controlled groups.’’ (See the definition
of ‘‘controlled group’’ in § 4001.2 of
PBGC’s regulation on Terminology (29
CFR Part 4001), which provides that
‘‘[a]ny reference to a plan’s controlled
group means all contributing sponsors
of the plan and all members of each
contributing sponsor’s controlled
group’’). Since a plan maintained by one
contributing sponsor may or may not
also be maintained by one or more other
contributing sponsors that are not in the
first sponsor’s controlled group, the
applicability of the cap must be
determined plan by plan, not employer
by employer.
Meaning of ‘‘employee’’
New section 4006(a)(3)(H) of ERISA
does not give guidance as to the
meaning of the term ‘‘employee.’’ PBGC
proposes to define ‘‘employee’’ for this
purpose by reference to section
410(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code,
which deals with minimum coverage
requirements for qualified plans and
requires that employees be counted to
evaluate the breadth of coverage of a
plan. For this purpose, certain
individuals may be counted as
‘‘employees’’ although they might not be
considered common law employees of
the employer—for example, affiliated
service group employees (under Code
section 414(m)) and leased employees
(under Code section 414(n)). PBGC
considers this approach appropriate to
prevent an employer from qualifying for
the cap by artificially lowering its
employee count through the use of
sophisticated business structuring
devices. In addition, in order to ensure
that all employees are counted, PBGC
proposes that the employee count be
determined without regard to Code
section 410(b)(3), (4), and (5), which
might be considered to exclude from the
count collective bargaining employees,
employees not meeting a plan’s age and
service requirements, and employees in
separate lines of business.
Cap Amount
Under new section 4006(a)(3)(H)(i) of
ERISA, the per-participant variable-rate
premium is capped at ‘‘$5 multiplied by
the number of participants in the plan
as of the close of the preceding plan
year.’’ PBGC interprets this to mean that
the participant count is to be taken as
of the premium snapshot date described
in the premium rates regulation and
PBGC’s premium instructions (generally
the last day of the plan year preceding
the premium payment year). This is
consistent with PBGC’s interpretation of
the nearly identical language in existing
section 4006(a)(3)(E)(i) of ERISA. This
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
participant count is the same as the
count used as a multiplier under section
4006(a)(3)(A)(i) of ERISA for purposes of
both the flat- and variable-rate
premiums. Thus, an eligible plan’s total
variable-rate premium is capped at an
amount equal to $5 multiplied by the
square of the participant count.
Regulatory Provisions
This rule would revise § 4006.3(b) of
the premium rates regulation to reflect
the new cap on the variable-rate
premium added by section 405 of PPA
2006. The existing variable-rate
premium is described in new paragraph
(b)(1) of § 4006.3. The cap is described
in new paragraph (b)(2); plans eligible
for the cap in new paragraph (b)(3); and
the meaning of the term ‘‘employee’’ in
new paragraph (b)(4). Paragraph (b)(2)
includes an example of the computation
of the cap taken from page 95 of the
Technical Explanation of H.R. 4, the
‘‘Pension Protection Act of 2006,’’ as
Passed by the House on July 28, 2006,
and as Considered by the Senate on
August 3, 2006, Prepared by the Staff of
the Joint Committee on Taxation
(August 3, 2006) (https://www.house.gov/
jct/x-38-06.pdf).
Termination Premium
Section 8101(b) of DRA 2005 adds a
new paragraph (7) to the end of section
4006(a) of ERISA, creating a new
‘‘termination premium’’ that applies
only where certain distress and
involuntary terminations occur and then
only for three years. However, although
only section 4006 of ERISA is amended,
subparagraph (D) of new paragraph (7)
in effect modifies section 4007 of ERISA
as well. Sections 401(b) and 402(g)(2)(B)
of PPA 2006 make changes to the
termination premium rules of DRA
2005.
Termination Dates Covered
Section 8101(d)(2)(A) of DRA 2005
(which does not amend ERISA) restricts
the new termination premium to ‘‘plans
terminated after December 31, 2005.’’
(Section 401(b)(1) of PPA 2006 repeals
new section 4006(a)(7)(E) of ERISA,
added by DRA 2005, which provided
that the termination premium would not
apply ‘‘with respect to any plan
terminated after December 31, 2010.’’)
Section 8101(d)(2)(B) of DRA 2005
further restricts the application of the
new termination premium in certain
bankruptcy situations. If a plan ‘‘is
terminated during the pendency of any
bankruptcy reorganization proceeding
under chapter 11 of title 11, United
States Code (or under any similar law of
a State or political subdivision of a
State),’’ the new premium does not
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
apply ‘‘if the proceeding is pursuant to
a bankruptcy filing occurring before
October 18, 2005.’’ Under section
402(g)(2)(B)(ii) of PPA 2006, this
limitation does not apply to an ‘‘eligible
plan’’ under section 402(c)(1) of PPA
2006 (generally a plan of a commercial
passenger airline or airline catering
service) while a funding election under
section 402(a)(1) of PPA 2006 is in effect
for the plan.
These time restrictions on the
applicability of the new premium turn
on when a plan is ‘‘terminated.’’ PBGC
believes that the most natural reading of
these provisions is that the date to look
to is the termination date under section
4048 of ERISA. Focusing on the section
4048 termination date is also consistent
with other provisions of DRA 2005 and
implementing regulations discussed
below.
Types of Terminations Covered
Under new section 4006(a)(7)(A) of
ERISA, the termination premium
applies where ‘‘there is a termination of
a single-employer plan under clause (ii)
or (iii) of section 4041(c)(2)(B) [of
ERISA] or section 4042 [of ERISA].’’
Section 4041(c) of ERISA provides for
distress terminations; ERISA section
4042 provides for involuntary
terminations.
Under ERISA section 4041(c)(1), a
distress termination of a plan may occur
only if each contributing sponsor and
each member of any contributing
sponsor’s controlled group meets one of
the ‘‘distress tests’’ in clauses (i), (ii),
and (iii) of section 4041(c)(2)(B). The
tests are that the person is the subject of
a bankruptcy liquidation proceeding
(clause (i)), that the person is the subject
of a bankruptcy reorganization
proceeding (clause (ii)), or that the
person is suffering business hardship
(clause (iii)).
Although typically all contributing
sponsors and controlled group members
meet the same distress test, that is not
required for a distress termination under
section 4041(c). Thus, while
terminations where all contributing
sponsors and controlled group members
meet the test in clause (i) seem to be
excluded from applicability of the
termination premium, it is not clear
from the statutory language whether the
termination premium is to apply to
terminations where one or more
contributing sponsors and/or controlled
group members meet the clause (i) test
but others meet the tests in clauses (ii)
and/or (iii). Examples of such situations
would be where there are two
contributing sponsors, one liquidating
and one reorganizing; where the sole
contributing sponsor is liquidating but
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
there are controlled group members that
are reorganizing; and where the sole
contributing sponsor is reorganizing but
the controlled group members are
liquidating.
The statutory language provides no
basis for distinguishing among these
examples or others that might be cited.
All contributing sponsors and
controlled group members are liable for
plan underfunding under ERISA section
4062 and (as discussed below) for the
termination premium (if it applies), and
they must all satisfy one or another
distress test under ERISA section
4041(c)(2)(B) for a distress termination
to take place. This suggests that all these
entities should be considered
responsible as a group for the
consequences of plan termination and
that the fact that one entity among
several is liquidating should not shield
the others from liability. PBGC thus
interprets new section 4006(a)(7)(A) of
ERISA as applying the termination
premium in any distress termination
case where at least one contributing
sponsor or controlled group member
meets the distress test in either clause
(ii) or (iii) of section 4041(c)(2)(B) (i.e.,
is not liquidating).
Payers
Section 4007(a) of ERISA places
responsibility for paying PBGC
premiums on the ‘‘designated payor’’ of
a plan, and section 4007(e)(1)(A) of
ERISA identifies the designated payor of
a single-employer plan as the
contributing sponsor or plan
administrator. However, new section
4006(a)(7)(D)(i)(II) of ERISA, as added
by section 8101(b) of DRA 2005,
provides that notwithstanding section
4007, the designated payor of the new
termination premium is ‘‘the person
who is the contributing sponsor as of
immediately before the termination
date.’’ It thus appears that the
designated payor is to be identified as
of the day before the termination date
under section 4048 of ERISA. Similarly,
this rule provides for identification of
members of the contributing sponsor’s
controlled group (which are jointly and
severally liable for premiums under
section 4007(e)(2) of ERISA) as of the
same day.
Participants
Under new section 4006(a)(7)(A) of
ERISA, the termination premium is
based on the number of ‘‘participants in
the plan immediately before the
termination date.’’ It thus appears that
participants are to be counted—for
purposes of computing the termination
premium—as of the day before the
termination date under section 4048 of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7757
ERISA (the same day on which the
contributing sponsor and controlled
group members are determined). Section
4006.6 of the premium rates regulation
already includes a definition of
‘‘participant’’ (which is used in
computing the flat-rate premium), and
DRA 2005 suggests no reason to depart
from that definition for purposes of the
termination premium.
Due Dates
The termination premium is payable
each year for three years. Under new
section 4006(a)(7)(D)(i)(I) of ERISA, as
added by section 8101(b) of DRA 2005,
the new premium is due within 30 days
after the beginning of each of three
‘‘applicable 12-month periods,’’ which
are in turn described in new section
4006(a)(7)(C). New section
4006(a)(7)(C)(i)(I) provides that in
general, the first applicable 12-month
period starts with ‘‘the first month
following the month in which the
termination date occurs.’’ (From this it
is evident that calendar months are
meant.) Under new section
4006(a)(7)(C)(i)(II), the second and third
applicable 12-month periods are simply
the two 12-month periods that follow
the first applicable 12-month period.
But new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of
ERISA defers the beginning of the first
applicable 12-month period (and thus
the due dates) in certain bankruptcy
reorganization cases. This deferral rule
comes into play where ‘‘the
requirements of subparagraph (B) [of
new section 4006(a)(7) of ERISA] are
met in connection with the termination
of the plan * * *.’’ (Section 401(b)(2) of
PPA 2006 corrected an erroneous
reference to ‘‘subparagraph (B)(i)(I)’’ in
new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of ERISA.)
Subparagraph (B) of new section
4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA defers the
applicability of the termination
premium for distress or involuntary
plan terminations that occur when
bankruptcy reorganization proceedings
are pending for terminations ‘‘under
section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) [of ERISA] or
under section 4042 [of ERISA].’’
Following the same reasoning discussed
above regarding new section
4006(a)(7)(A) of ERISA (the general
termination premium applicability
provision), PBGC concludes that the
bankruptcy reorganization deferral
provision in new section 4006(a)(7)(B)
of ERISA is meant to apply to a distress
termination only when at least one
contributing sponsor or controlled
group member satisfies the bankruptcy
reorganization test in section
4041(c)(2)(B)(ii).
In order for the due date deferral rule
in new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
7758
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
ERISA to apply, the requirements of
subparagraph (B) of section 4006(a)(7) of
ERISA must be met ‘‘with respect to 1
or more persons described in such
subparagraph’’ (that is, one or more
persons must be reorganizing in
bankruptcy as described in
subparagraph (B)). If so, then the first
applicable 12-month period begins with
‘‘the first month following the month
which includes the earliest date as of
which each such person is discharged or
dismissed in the case described in such
clause [sic] in connection with such
person.’’ (The only clause mentioned in
section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of ERISA is
clause (i)(I) of section 4006(a)(7)(C),
which describes the first applicable 12month period that applies if the special
bankruptcy rule does not. Thus the
reference to ‘‘such clause’’ appears to be
intended to refer to ‘‘such
subparagraph’’—that is, subparagraph
(B)—and PBGC so interprets the
reference.)
However, although subparagraph (B)
of new section 4006(a)(7) of ERISA
describes a case—a bankruptcy case—it
does not describe a person. The only
person mentioned in subparagraph (B)
is ‘‘such person,’’ with no crossreference to another place where the
person is described. Nonetheless, it
seems clear that the person referred to
must be a person that has a relationship
to both the plan and the bankruptcy
proceeding mentioned in subparagraph
(B). Subparagraph (B) contains
parenthetical language that is essentially
identical to parenthetical language that
appears in section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) of
ERISA (which describes the bankruptcy
reorganization test for distress
terminations). In section
4041(c)(2)(B)(ii), the words ‘‘such
person’’ in the parenthetical language
refer to a contributing sponsor or
member of a contributing sponsor’s
controlled group. PBGC infers that
‘‘such person’’ in new section
4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA is meant to refer
likewise to a contributing sponsor of the
terminated plan or member of a
contributing sponsor’s controlled
group—determined (consistent with the
designated payor provision in new
section 4007(a)(7)(D)(i)(II)) as of the day
before the termination date under
section 4048 of ERISA.
This inference is supported by the
observation that these same persons—
contributing sponsors and controlled
group members—are the persons liable
for the termination premium. It appears
that Congress’ intent was to defer the
due date for the termination premium
until the persons liable to pay it were
not in bankruptcy proceedings.
Accordingly, where the special
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
bankruptcy rule for due dates applies, it
is necessary to identify every
contributing sponsor and controlled
group member that was involved in
bankruptcy reorganization proceedings
on the termination date and determine
the date when each one left
bankruptcy—through dismissal of or
discharge from the proceeding—or
ceased to exist. (If an entity ceases to
exist, its failure to emerge from
bankruptcy should not postpone the
termination premium due date.) Under
new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii), the first
applicable 12-month period for the
termination will then begin with the
calendar month that next begins
following the last such date.
One due date issue not addressed by
the statute is that the agreement or court
action establishing a plan’s termination
date under ERISA section 4048 may
occur well after the termination date so
established. Where a termination date is
thus ‘‘retroactively’’ set, one or more
statutory due dates for the termination
premium may already have passed
when the termination date becomes
known. Thus, termination premium
payments could be overdue before it
was determined that they were owed.
In cases of that kind, PBGC considers
it appropriate to provide that where the
termination date is set retroactively, the
first applicable 12-month period does
not begin immediately after the month
in which the termination date falls, but
rather begins immediately after the
month in which the termination date is
established. Where the special
bankruptcy rule for due dates applies,
this rule would come into play if the
termination date was established after
all contributing sponsors and controlled
group members were out of bankruptcy
reorganization proceedings, and would
defer the beginning of the first
applicable 12-month period until
immediately after the month in which
the termination date was established.
Other Bankruptcy Issues
The parenthetical language in new
section 4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA—‘‘(or a
case described in section 4041(c)(2)(B)(i)
filed by or against such person has been
converted, as of such date, to such a
case in which reorganization is
sought)’’—shows that Congress focused
on the fact that bankruptcy proceedings
can be converted back and forth
between liquidation and reorganization
proceedings. But neither section
4006(a)(7)(B) nor section
4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) (which describes the
special first applicable 12-month
period) mentions conversion of a
reorganization case to a liquidation case
as being sufficient to trigger the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
beginning of the first applicable 12month period. It thus appears that even
after such a conversion, the first
applicable 12-month period would be
postponed until the (liquidation)
bankruptcy proceeding were dismissed
or the contributing sponsor or
controlled group member discharged.
This could be of significance where
there were other persons liable for the
termination premium that were not (or
were no longer) in bankruptcy.
Section 8101(d)(2)(B) of DRA 2005
(which, as discussed above, excludes
from the termination premium
terminations that occur during the
pendency of bankruptcy reorganization
proceedings pursuant to a filing before
October 18, 2005) says nothing about
the persons involved in such
proceedings. Following the reasoning
above, PBGC concludes that section
8101(d)(2)(B) is intended to apply only
where the subject of a pending
bankruptcy proceeding is a contributing
sponsor of the terminated plan or a
member of a contributing sponsor’s
controlled group (and that these persons
are to be identified as of the day before
the termination date under section 4048
of ERISA). Section 8101(d)(2)(B) also
does not mention conversion of a
bankruptcy case from a liquidation
proceeding to a reorganization, as new
section 4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA does. But
the language of section 8101(d)(2)(B) is
consistent with the interpretation that—
like section 4006(a)(7)(B)—it covers
bankruptcy proceedings begun as
liquidation proceedings and converted
to reorganization proceedings before the
termination date under section 4048 of
ERISA.
Termination Premium Rate
Under new section 4006(a)(7) of
ERISA as added by section 8101(b) of
DRA 2005, the termination premium is
$1,250 per participant per year for three
years. But under section 402(g)(2)(B) of
PPA 2006 (which does not amend
ERISA), the rate is increased from
$1,250 to $2,500 where a commercial
passenger airline or airline catering
service elects funding relief (an
extended underfunding amortization
period and lenient assumptions for
valuing liabilities) for a frozen plan
under section 402(a)(1) of PPA 2006, if
the plan terminates during the first five
years of the funding relief period, unless
the Secretary of Labor determines that
the termination resulted from
extraordinary circumstances such as a
terrorist attack or other similar event.
Regulatory Provisions
This rule would add a new § 4006.7
to the premium rates regulation
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
providing that the amount of the
termination premium with respect to
each applicable 12-month period is the
premium rate (generally $1,250) times
the number of participants, determined
as of the day before the termination
date, with a cross-reference from
§ 4006.3 (where the flat and variable
premium rates are set forth). New
§ 4006.7(b) also explains the
circumstances in which the termination
premium rate is $2,500 rather than
$1,250. In addition, the rule would add
a new § 4007.13 to the premium
payment regulation (with a crossreference from § 4006.7), where the rest
of the provisions about the termination
premium are found.
New § 4007.13 contains provisions
specific to the termination premium,
and it supplements provisions in
existing sections of Part 4007 that also
apply to the termination premium.
Section 4007.13(a) describes when the
termination premium applies; § 4007.13
(d), (e), and (f) deal with due dates;
§ 4007.13(g) deals with what persons are
liable for the termination premium. The
provisions on these three topics reflect
the discussions above.
Section 4007.13(b) makes each
contributing sponsor and controlled
group member (determined as of the day
before the termination date under
section 4048 of ERISA) responsible for
filing required termination premium
information and payments, and (where
there is more than one such person)
provides that any one can file on behalf
of all of them. This provision ensures
that, so long as there is at least one
person still in existence that is liable for
the termination premium, there will be
at least one identifiable entity with
responsibility to file. This provision is
similar to § 4010.3 of PBGC’s regulation
on Annual Financial and Actuarial
Information Reporting (Part 4010 of
PBGC’s regulations) and § 4043.3(a) of
PBGC’s regulation on Reportable Events
and Certain Other Notification
Requirements (Part 4043 of PBGC’s
regulations). Thus, only a single filing of
the premium and required premium
information is required, but if it is not
timely made, PBGC could seek
enforcement against any or all
contributing sponsors and controlled
group members.
Section 4007.13(c) provides for a
discretionary ‘‘facts-and-circumstances’’
penalty for failure to pay the
termination premium timely, instead of
the automatic 1 percent or 5 percent
penalty that applies to late payment of
flat- and variable-rate premiums under
§ 4007.8(a). PBGC wants to preserve
flexibility in penalizing failures to pay
the new premium in full and on time
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
while it gains experience with the new
premium. The penalty is limited to 100
percent of the amount of termination
premium not timely filed.
In addition, this rule would amend
several sections in the existing premium
payment regulation to eliminate
inconsistencies or potential
inconsistencies between existing
language in those sections and the
termination premium provisions.
Technical Changes
PBGC is taking this opportunity to
make some technical changes (unrelated
to DRA 2005 or PPA 2006) to its
regulations on Premium Rates and
Payment of Premiums.
Section 4006.3 of the premium rates
regulation refers to basic benefits
guaranteed under section 4022(a) of
ERISA (which relates only to singleemployer plans) and omits mention of
section 4022A(a) of ERISA (which
relates to multi-employer plans). This
rule would add a reference to section
4022A(a).
Section 4007.11(d) of the premium
payment regulation states that where
proration of the flat- and variable-rate
premiums is available under § 4006.5(f)
of the premium rates regulation, the unprorated premium must be paid in full
(even if the plan would be entitled to a
refund). This provision is anachronistic:
PBGC now permits payment of the
prorated amount under § 4006.5(f),
rather than requiring that a filer pay the
un-prorated amount and request a
refund. This rule would remove the
outdated provision.
Section 4007.11(e) of the premium
payment regulation permits PBGC to
return improper filings and consider
them not made. PBGC is not exercising
this authority, and the provision is
unnecessary; PBGC has authority to
assess penalties under ERISA section
4071 for failure to submit material
information under the premium
payment regulation. This rule would
remove § 4007.11(e).
Applicability
The regulatory changes made by this
rule to implement the provisions of
section 8101 of DRA 2005 would apply
(as section 8101 of DRA 2005 does) to
plan years beginning after 2005 and to
terminations with termination dates
after 2005 (subject to the special rule for
bankruptcies filed before October 18,
2005). The regulatory changes made by
this rule to implement the provisions of
section 405 of PPA 2006 would apply
(as section 405 of PPA 2006 does) to
plan years beginning after 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7759
Compliance With Rulemaking
Guidelines
The PBGC has determined, in
consultation with the Office of
Management and Budget, that this
proposed rule is a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866. The Office of Management
and Budget, therefore, has reviewed the
rule under Executive Order 12866.
PBGC certifies under section 605(b) of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act that the
amendments in this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule implements statutory changes
made by Congress. It provides guidance
on how to calculate, pay, and
substantiate the premiums prescribed by
statute and imposes no significant
burden beyond the burden imposed by
statute. Furthermore:
• The statutorily imposed increase in
the flat-rate premium is at most $11 per
participant per year, which does not
constitute a significant economic impact
where a plan has a small number of
participants. Although the flat-rate
premium will increase as the number of
participants increases, the economic
impact of the flat-rate premium relative
to the size of the entity will remain
fairly constant and will not be
significant for a substantial number of
entities of any size.
• The statutorily imposed cap on the
variable-rate premium will save
qualifying plans money. The rule
simply interprets the statutory
provisions.
• The statutorily imposed termination
premium will not affect a substantial
number of entities of any size.
Accordingly, as provided in section 605
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603 and 604
do not apply.
The information requirements relating
to the flat-rate and variable-rate
premiums have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (OMB
control number 1212–0009, expires
April 30, 2008).
PBGC is submitting the information
requirements relating to the termination
premium to the Office of Management
and Budget for review and approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Copies of PBGC’s request may be
obtained free of charge by contacting the
Disclosure Division of the Office of the
General Counsel of PBGC, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–
4040.
PBGC needs this information to
identify the plan for which a
termination premium is paid to PBGC,
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
7760
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
to verify the determination of the
premium, and to identify the persons
liable for the premium.
PBGC expects that it will receive
termination premium filings from about
30 contributing sponsors or controlled
group members annually and that the
total annual burden of the collection of
information will be about 40 hours and
$264,000.
Comments on the paperwork
provisions under this proposed rule
should be mailed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
Washington, DC 20503. Although
comments may be submitted through
April 23, 2007, the Office of
Management and Budget requests that
comments be received on or before
March 22, 2007 to ensure their
consideration. Comments may address
(among other things)—
• Whether the proposed collection of
information is needed for the proper
performance of PBGC’s functions and
will have practical utility;
• The accuracy of PBGC’s estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhancement of the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4006
Pension insurance, Pensions.
29 CFR Part 4007
Penalties, Pension insurance,
Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons given above, PBGC is
amending 29 CFR parts 4006 and 4007
as follows.
PART 4006—PREMIUM RATES
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
1. The authority citation for part 4006
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1306,
1307.
2. In § 4006.3:
a. The introductory text is amended
by removing the words ‘‘§ 4006.5
(dealing with exemptions and special
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
rules)’’ and adding in their place the
words ‘‘§ 4006.5 (dealing with
exemptions and special rules) and
§ 4006.7 (dealing with premiums for
certain terminated single-employer
plans)’’; and by removing the words
‘‘section 4022(a)’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘section 4022(a) or
section 4022A(a)’’.
b. Paragraph (a) introductory text is
amended by removing the words
‘‘multiplied by—’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘multiplied by the
applicable flat premium rate determined
under paragraph (c) of this section.’’.
c. Paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) are
removed.
d. Paragraph (b) is revised, and new
paragraphs (c) and (d) are added, to read
as follows:
§ 4006.3
Premium rate.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Variable-rate premium.
(1) In general. Subject to the
limitation in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, the variable-rate premium is $9
for each $1,000 of a single-employer
plan’s unfunded vested benefits, as
determined under § 4006.4.
(2) Cap on variable-rate premium. If a
plan is described in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section for the premium payment
year, the variable-rate premium does not
exceed $5 multiplied by the square of
the number of participants in the plan
on the last day of the plan year
preceding the premium payment year.
For example, if the number of
participants in the plan on the last day
of the plan year preceding the premium
payment year is 20, the variable-rate
premium does not exceed $2,000 ($5 ×
202 = $5 × 400 = $2,000).
(3) Plans eligible for cap. A plan is
described in this paragraph (b)(3) for the
premium payment year if the aggregate
number of employees of all employers
in the plan’s controlled group on the
first day of the premium payment year
is 25 or fewer.
(4) Meaning of ‘‘employee.’’ For
purposes of paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, the aggregate number of
employees is determined in the same
manner as under section 410(b)(1) of the
Code, taking into account the provisions
of section 414(m) and (n) of the Code,
but without regard to section 410(b)(3),
(4), and (5) of the Code.
(c) Applicable flat premium rate. The
applicable flat premium rate is:
(1) For a premium payment year
beginning before 2006—
(i) For a single-employer plan, $19,
and
(ii) For a multiemployer plan, $2.60.
(2) For a premium payment year
beginning in 2006—
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(i) For a single-employer plan, $30,
and
(ii) For a multiemployer plan, $8.
(3) For a premium payment year
beginning after 2006, the greater of—
(i) The applicable flat premium rate
for plan years beginning in the calendar
year preceding the calendar year in
which the premium payment year
begins, or
(ii) The adjusted flat rate determined
under paragraph (d) of this section for
the premium payment year.
(d) Adjusted flat rate. The adjusted
flat rate for a premium payment year
beginning after 2006 is determined by—
(1) Multiplying the applicable flat
premium rate for 2006 by the ratio of—
(i) The national average wage index
(as defined in section 209(k)(1) of the
Social Security Act) for the first of the
two calendar years preceding the
calendar year in which the premium
payment year begins, to
(ii) The national average wage index
(as so defined) for 2004; and
(2) Rounding the result to the nearest
multiple of $1 (rounding up any
unrounded result that equals some
whole number of dollars plus 50 cents).
3. New § 4006.7 is added to read as
follows:
§ 4006.7 Premium rate for certain
terminated single-employer plans.
(a) The premium under this section
(‘‘termination premium’’) applies to a
DRA 2005 termination described in
§ 4007.13 of this chapter.
(b) The amount of the premium under
this section that is payable with respect
to each applicable 12-month period (as
described in § 4007.13 of this chapter) is
the number of participants in the plan,
determined as of the day before the
termination date under section 4048 of
ERISA, multiplied by the termination
premium rate. In general, the
termination premium rate is $1,250.
However, the termination premium rate
is $2,500 for an ‘‘eligible plan’’ under
section 402(c)(1) of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (dealing with
certain plans of commercial passenger
airlines and airline catering services)
while an election under section
402(a)(1) of the Pension Protection Act
of 2006 (dealing with alternative
funding schedules) is in effect for the
plan if the plan terminates during the
five-year period beginning on the first
day of the first applicable plan year (as
defined in section 402(c)(2) of that Act)
with respect to the plan, unless the
Secretary of Labor determines that the
plan terminated as a result of
extraordinary circumstances such as a
terrorist attack or other similar event.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(c) The premium under this section is
in addition to any other premium under
this part.
(d) See § 4007.13 of this chapter for
further rules about termination
premiums.
f. Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘plan
administrator’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘designated recordkeeper’’.
g. New paragraph (a)(3) is added to
read as follows:
PART 4007—PAYMENT OF PREMIUMS
4. The authority citation for part 4007
continues to read as follows:
§ 4007.10 Recordkeeping; audits;
disclosure of information.
(a) Retention of records to support
premium payments.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Designated recordkeepers.
(i) With respect to the flat-rate and
variable-rate premiums described in
§ 4006.3 of this chapter, the plan
administrator is the designated
recordkeeper.
(ii) With respect to the premium for
certain terminated single-employer
plans described in § 4006.7 of this
chapter, each person who was a
contributing sponsor of such a plan, or
was a member of a contributing
sponsor’s controlled group, as of the day
before the plan’s termination date is a
designated recordkeeper.
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 4007.11:
a. Paragraph (a) introductory text is
amended by removing the words ‘‘The
premium filing due date for small
plans’’ and adding in their place the
words ‘‘For flat-rate and variable-rate
premiums, the premium filing due date
for small plans’’.
b. Paragraph (a)(3) introductory text is
amended by removing the words ‘‘the
premium form or forms and payment or
payments for the short plan year shall
be filed by’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘the due date or dates for the
flat-rate premium and any variable-rate
premium for the short plan year are’’;
and by removing the words ‘‘for the
premium forms and payments’’.
c. Paragraph (c) introductory text is
amended by removing the words ‘‘the
premium form and all premium
payments due for the first plan year of
coverage of any new plan or newly
covered plan shall be filed on or before’’
and adding in their place the words ‘‘the
due date for the flat-rate premium and
any variable-rate premium for the first
plan year of coverage of any new plan
or newly covered plan shall be’’.
d. Paragraph (d) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘to file the forms or
forms prescribed by this part and to pay
any premiums due’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘to make flat-rate and
(as applicable) variable-rate premium
filings and payments under this part’’;
and by removing the last sentence of the
paragraph (beginning ‘‘The entire
* * *’’ and ending ‘‘* * *
§ 4006.5(f).’’).
e. Paragraph (e) is removed.
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1303(a),
1306, 1307.
5. Section 4007.3 is amended by
removing the words ‘‘The plan
administrator’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘Subject to the provisions of
§ 4007.13, the plan administrator’’; and
by removing ‘‘§ 4007.11’’ and adding in
its place the words ‘‘this part’’.
6. In § 4007.7, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing ‘‘§ 4007.11’’ and
adding in its place the words ‘‘this
part’’.
7. In § 4007.8:
a. Paragraph (a) introductory text is
amended by removing the words ‘‘If any
premium payment due’’ and adding in
their place the words ‘‘Subject to the
provisions of § 4007.13, if any premium
payment due’’; and by removing
‘‘§ 4007.11’’ and adding in its place the
words ‘‘this part’’.
b. Paragraph (a)(1)(i) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘plan’s’’.
c. Paragraph (a)(1) introductory text is
revised to read as follows:
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
§ 4007.8
Late payment penalty charges.
(a) Penalty charge. * * *
(1) Penalty rate; in general. Except as
provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, the penalty rate is—
*
*
*
*
*
8. In § 4007.9, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the words ‘‘by a
plan administrator’’; and by removing
the words ‘‘that plan’s’’ and adding in
their place the words ‘‘a plan’s’’.
9. In § 4007.10:
a. Paragraph (a)(1) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘plan
administrator’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘designated recordkeeper
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section’’.
b. Paragraph (a)(2) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘The plan
administrator’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘A designated recordkeeper’’.
c. Paragraph (b) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘for any premium
payment year’’.
d. Paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘The plan
administrator’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘A designated recordkeeper’’.
e. Paragraph (c)(2) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘the plan
administrator’’ and adding in their place
the words ‘‘a designated recordkeeper’’.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7761
11. In § 4007.12, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the words ‘‘to file
the applicable forms and to submit the
premium payment’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘to make flat-rate and
variable-rate premium filings and
payments under this part’’; and by
removing the words ‘‘liable for premium
payments’’ and adding in their place
‘‘liable for flat-rate and variable-rate
premium payments’’.
12. New § 4007.13 is added to read as
follows:
§ 4007.13 Premiums for certain terminated
single-employer plans.
(a) Applicability.
(1) In general. This section applies
where there is a ‘‘DRA 2005
termination’’ of a plan. Subject to
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, there is
a DRA 2005 termination where a singleemployer plan’s termination date under
section 4048 of ERISA is after 2005 and
either—
(i) The plan terminates under section
4042 of ERISA, or
(ii) The plan terminates under section
4041(c) of ERISA and at least one
contributing sponsor or member of a
contributing sponsor’s controlled group
meets the requirements of section
4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) or (iii) of ERISA.
(2) Plans terminated during
reorganization proceedings. Except as
provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, a DRA 2005 termination of a
plan does not occur where as of the
plan’s termination date under section
4048 of ERISA—
(i) A bankruptcy proceeding has been
filed by or against any person that was
a contributing sponsor of the plan on
the day before the plan’s termination
date or that was on that day a member
of any controlled group of which any
such contributing sponsor was a
member,
(ii) The proceeding is pending as a
reorganization proceeding under
chapter 11 of title 11, United States
Code (or under any similar law of a
State or political subdivision of a State),
(iii) The person has not been
discharged from the proceeding, and
(iv) The proceeding was filed before
October 18, 2005.
(3) Special rule for certain airlinerelated plans. Paragraph (a)(2) of this
section does not apply to an ‘‘eligible
plan’’ under section 402(c)(1) of the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (dealing
with certain plans of commercial
passenger airlines and airline catering
services) while an election under
section 402(a)(1) of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (dealing with
alternative funding schedules) is in
effect for the plan.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
7762
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
(4) Termination premium. A premium
as described in § 4006.7 of this chapter
is payable to PBGC with respect to a
DRA 2005 termination each year for
three years after the termination (the
‘‘termination premium’’).
(b) Filing requirements; method of
filing. Notwithstanding § 4007.3, in the
case of a DRA 2005 termination of a
plan, each person that was a
contributing sponsor of the plan on the
day before the plan’s termination date or
that was on that day a member of any
controlled group of which any such
contributing sponsor was a member is
responsible for filing prescribed
termination premium information and
payments. Any such person may file on
behalf of all such persons.
(c) Late payment penalty charges.
Notwithstanding § 4007.8(a), if any
required termination premium payment
is not filed by the due date under
paragraph (d) of this section, PBGC may
assess a late payment penalty charge
based on the facts and circumstances,
subject to waiver under § 4007.8(b), (c),
(d), or (e). The charge will not exceed
the amount of termination premium not
timely filed.
(d) Due dates. Notwithstanding
§ 4007.11, the due date for the
termination premium is the 30th day of
each of three applicable 12-month
periods. The three applicable 12-month
periods with respect to a DRA 2005
termination of a plan are—
(1) First applicable 12-month period.
Except as provided in paragraph (e) or
(f) of this section, the period of 12
calendar months beginning with the
first calendar month following the
calendar month in which occurs the
plan’s termination date under section
4048 of ERISA, and
(2) Subsequent applicable 12-month
periods. Each of the first two periods of
12 calendar months that immediately
follow the first applicable 12-month
period.
(e) Certain reorganization cases.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:51 Feb 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
(1) This paragraph (e) applies with
respect to a DRA 2005 termination of a
plan if the conditions in both paragraph
(e)(2) and paragraph (e)(3) of this section
are satisfied.
(2) The condition of this paragraph
(e)(2) is that either—
(i) The plan terminates under section
4042 of ERISA, or
(ii) The plan terminates under section
4041(c) of ERISA and at least one
contributing sponsor or member of a
contributing sponsor’s controlled group
meets the requirements of section
4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) of ERISA.
(3) The condition of this paragraph
(e)(3) is that as of the plan’s termination
date under section 4048 of ERISA—
(i) A bankruptcy proceeding has been
filed by or against any person that was
a contributing sponsor of the plan on
the day before the plan’s termination
date or that was on that day a member
of any controlled group of which any
such contributing sponsor was a
member,
(ii) The proceeding is pending as a
reorganization proceeding under
chapter 11 of title 11, United States
Code (or under any similar law of a
State or political subdivision of a State),
and
(iii) The person has not been
discharged from the proceeding.
(4) If this paragraph (e) applies with
respect to a DRA 2005 termination of a
plan, then except as provided in
paragraph (f) of this section, the first
applicable 12-month period with
respect to the plan is the period of 12
calendar months beginning with the
first calendar month following the
calendar month in which occurs the
earliest date when, for every person that
was a contributing sponsor of the plan
on the day before the plan’s termination
date under section 4048 of ERISA, or
that was on that day a member of any
controlled group of which any such
contributing sponsor was a member,
either—
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(i) There is not pending any
bankruptcy proceeding that was filed by
or against such person and that was, as
of the plan’s termination date under
section 4048 of ERISA, a reorganization
proceeding under chapter 11 of title 11,
United States Code (or under any
similar law of a State or political
subdivision of a State), or
(ii) The person has been discharged
from any such proceeding, or
(iii) The person no longer exists.
(f) Retroactive plan termination date.
If a plan’s termination date under
section 4048 of ERISA is in the past
when it is established by agreement or
court action as described in section
4048 of ERISA, then the first applicable
12-month period for determining the
due dates of the termination premium
begins with the later of—
(1) The first calendar month following
the calendar month in which the
termination date is established by
agreement or court action as described
in section 4048 of ERISA, or
(2) The first calendar month specified
in paragraph (d)(1) of this section or (if
paragraph (e) of this section applies)
paragraph (e)(4) of this section.
(g) Liability for termination premiums.
In the case of a DRA 2005 termination
of a plan, each person that was a
contributing sponsor of the plan on the
day before the plan’s termination date,
or that was on that day a member of any
controlled group of which any such
contributing sponsor was a member, is
jointly and severally liable for
termination premiums with respect to
the plan.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 13th day of
February, 2007.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Interim Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7–2812 Filed 2–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 20, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7755-7762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2812]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4006 and 4007
RIN 1212-AB10
Premium Rates; Payment of Premiums; Flat Premium Rates, Variable-
Rate Premium Cap, and Termination Premium; Deficit Reduction Act of
2005; Pension Protection Act of 2006
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This is a proposed rule to amend PBGC's regulations on Premium
Rates and Payment of Premiums to implement certain provisions of the
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-171) and the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-280) that are effective beginning
in 2006 or 2007. The provisions that would be implemented by this rule
change the flat premium rate, cap the variable-rate premium in some
cases, and create a new ``termination premium'' that is payable in
connection with certain distress and involuntary plan terminations.
This rule does not address other provisions of the Pension Protection
Act of 2006 that deal with PBGC premiums.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by RIN number 1212-AB10, may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the Web site instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: reg.comments@pbgc.gov.
Fax: 202-326-4224.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Legislative and Regulatory
Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005-4026.
All submissions must include the Regulatory Information Number for this
rulemaking (RIN 1212-AB10). Comments received, including personal
information provided, will be posted to www.pbgc.gov. Copies of
comments may also be obtained by writing to Disclosure Division, Office
of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington DC 20005-4026, or calling 202-326-4040 during
normal business hours. (TTY and TDD users may call the Federal relay
service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-
4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John H. Hanley, Director, Legislative
and Regulatory Department; or Catherine B. Klion, Manager, or Deborah
C. Murphy, Attorney, Regulatory and Policy Division, Legislative and
Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington DC 20005-4026; 202-326-4024. (TTY/TDD users may
call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to
be connected to 202-326-4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) administers the pension
plan termination insurance program under Title IV of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Pension plans covered
by Title IV must pay premiums to PBGC. Section 4006 of ERISA deals with
premium rates, and section 4007 of ERISA deals with the payment of
premiums, including premium due dates, interest and penalties on
premiums not timely paid, and persons liable for premiums.
On February 8, 2006, the President signed into law the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-171 (DRA 2005). Section 8101 of DRA
2005 amends section 4006 of ERISA. Section 8101(a) changes the per-
participant flat premium rate for plan years beginning in 2006 from $19
to $30 for single-employer plans and from $2.60 to $8 for multiemployer
plans and provides for inflation adjustments to the flat rates for
future years. Section 8101(b) creates a new ``termination premium'' (in
addition to the flat-rate and variable-rate premiums under section
4006(a)(3)(A) and (E) of ERISA) that is payable for three years
following certain distress and involuntary plan terminations that occur
after 2005.
On August 17, 2006, the President signed into law the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109-280 (PPA 2006). Sections 401(b) and
402(g)(2)(B) of PPA 2006 make changes to the termination premium rules
of DRA 2005. Section 405 of PPA 2006 amends section 4006 of ERISA to
cap the variable-rate premium for plans of certain small employers
beginning in 2007. (PPA 2006 also makes other changes affecting PBGC
premiums that are not addressed in this rule.)
This rule would amend PBGC's regulations on Premium Rates (29 CFR
Part 4006) and Payment of Premiums (29 CFR Part 4007) to conform to
these requirements of DRA 2005 and PPA 2006 and to clarify how the
requirements apply.
Flat-Rate Premium
Until the enactment of DRA 2005, the flat-rate premium had remained
unchanged for single-employer plans since 1991 and for multiemployer
plans since 1989. Section 8101(a) of DRA 2005 amends section
4006(a)(3)(A) of ERISA and adds new subparagraphs (F) and (G) to the
end of section 4006(a)(3) of ERISA to raise the flat premium rates for
2006 for both single- and multiemployer plans and to provide for
inflation indexing for future years.
Applicability
Before amendment by DRA 2005, section 4006(a)(3)(A) of ERISA
provided (in part) that ``* * * the annual premium rate * * * is * * *
in the case of a single-employer plan, for plan years beginning after
December 31, 1990, an amount equal to the sum of $19 plus the [per-
participant variable-rate premium] under subparagraph (E) for each * *
* participant * * *'' Section 8101(a)(1)(A) of DRA 2005 changes ``$19''
to read ``$30.'' Thus, the amended text of ERISA, read literally, makes
it appear that the $30 single-employer flat-rate premium applies to
plan years beginning after 1990. However, section 8101(d)(1) of DRA
2005 (which does not amend ERISA) says that this change applies to plan
years beginning after December 31, 2005. Accordingly, PBGC considers
single-employer flat premium rates for plan years beginning before 2006
to be unaffected by DRA 2005.
Participant Count
Section 8101(a)(2)(A)(ii) of DRA 2005 adds a new clause (iv) to
section 4006(a)(3)(A) of ERISA providing that the flat premium rate for
a multiemployer plan for a post-2005 plan year is ``$8.00 for each
individual who is a participant in such plan during the applicable plan
year.'' PBGC interprets this to mean that the participant count is to
be taken as of the premium snapshot date described in the premium rates
regulation and PBGC's premium instructions (generally the last day of
the plan year preceding the premium payment year). This is consistent
with PBGC's interpretation of the nearly identical language in existing
section 4006(a)(3)(A)(i) of ERISA.
[[Page 7756]]
Inflation Adjustments
Section 8101(a)(1)(B) and (2)(B) of DRA 2005 add to section
4006(a)(3) of ERISA substantially identical new subparagraphs (F) and
(G) providing for inflation adjustments to the $30 and $8 flat rates
for plan years beginning after 2006. The adjustments are based on
changes in the national average wage index as defined in section
209(k)(1) of the Social Security Act, with a two-year lag--for example,
for 2007, it will be the 2005 index that will be compared to the
baseline (the 2004 index). However, new subparagraphs (F) and (G) are
written in such a way that the premium rate can never go down; if the
change in the national average wage index is negative, the premium rate
remains the same as in the preceding year. Also, under new
subparagraphs (F) and (G), premium rates are rounded to the nearest
whole dollar. PBGC interprets this to mean that if the adjustment
formula would produce an unrounded premium rate of some number of
dollars plus 50 cents, the premium rate will be rounded up.
Regulatory Provisions
This rule would amend Sec. 4006.3 of the premium rates regulation
to reflect the changes to the flat-rate premium made by section 8101(a)
of DRA 2005. Existing paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of Sec. 4006.3
(setting forth the $19 and $2.60 flat rates) would be removed, and a
cross-reference to new Sec. 4006.3(c) would be provided instead.
Paragraph (1) of new Sec. 4006.3(c) provides pre-2006 rates ($19 and
$2.60); paragraph (2) provides 2006 rates ($30 and $8); and paragraph
(3) provides post-2006 rates (the greater of the preceding year's rate
or the inflation-adjusted rate). The inflation adjustment is described
in new Sec. 4006.3(d).
Variable-Rate Premium
Section 405 of PPA 2006 amends section 4006(a)(3)(E)(i) of ERISA
and adds new subparagraph (H) to the end of section 4006(a)(3) to cap
the variable-rate premium for certain plans, effective for plan years
beginning after 2006.
Plans Covered
Clause (i) of new section 4006(a)(3)(H) of ERISA says that the new
variable-rate premium cap applies ``[i]n the case of an employer who
has 25 or fewer employees on the first day of the plan year.'' But
clause (ii) of new section 4006(a)(3)(H) of ERISA makes clear that the
applicability of the new cap does not necessarily depend on the size of
a single employer, but rather depends on the size of a plan's
controlled group, that is, the aggregate size of ``all contributing
sponsors and their controlled groups.'' (See the definition of
``controlled group'' in Sec. 4001.2 of PBGC's regulation on
Terminology (29 CFR Part 4001), which provides that ``[a]ny reference
to a plan's controlled group means all contributing sponsors of the
plan and all members of each contributing sponsor's controlled
group''). Since a plan maintained by one contributing sponsor may or
may not also be maintained by one or more other contributing sponsors
that are not in the first sponsor's controlled group, the applicability
of the cap must be determined plan by plan, not employer by employer.
Meaning of ``employee''
New section 4006(a)(3)(H) of ERISA does not give guidance as to the
meaning of the term ``employee.'' PBGC proposes to define ``employee''
for this purpose by reference to section 410(b)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code, which deals with minimum coverage requirements for
qualified plans and requires that employees be counted to evaluate the
breadth of coverage of a plan. For this purpose, certain individuals
may be counted as ``employees'' although they might not be considered
common law employees of the employer--for example, affiliated service
group employees (under Code section 414(m)) and leased employees (under
Code section 414(n)). PBGC considers this approach appropriate to
prevent an employer from qualifying for the cap by artificially
lowering its employee count through the use of sophisticated business
structuring devices. In addition, in order to ensure that all employees
are counted, PBGC proposes that the employee count be determined
without regard to Code section 410(b)(3), (4), and (5), which might be
considered to exclude from the count collective bargaining employees,
employees not meeting a plan's age and service requirements, and
employees in separate lines of business.
Cap Amount
Under new section 4006(a)(3)(H)(i) of ERISA, the per-participant
variable-rate premium is capped at ``$5 multiplied by the number of
participants in the plan as of the close of the preceding plan year.''
PBGC interprets this to mean that the participant count is to be taken
as of the premium snapshot date described in the premium rates
regulation and PBGC's premium instructions (generally the last day of
the plan year preceding the premium payment year). This is consistent
with PBGC's interpretation of the nearly identical language in existing
section 4006(a)(3)(E)(i) of ERISA. This participant count is the same
as the count used as a multiplier under section 4006(a)(3)(A)(i) of
ERISA for purposes of both the flat- and variable-rate premiums. Thus,
an eligible plan's total variable-rate premium is capped at an amount
equal to $5 multiplied by the square of the participant count.
Regulatory Provisions
This rule would revise Sec. 4006.3(b) of the premium rates
regulation to reflect the new cap on the variable-rate premium added by
section 405 of PPA 2006. The existing variable-rate premium is
described in new paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 4006.3. The cap is described
in new paragraph (b)(2); plans eligible for the cap in new paragraph
(b)(3); and the meaning of the term ``employee'' in new paragraph
(b)(4). Paragraph (b)(2) includes an example of the computation of the
cap taken from page 95 of the Technical Explanation of H.R. 4, the
``Pension Protection Act of 2006,'' as Passed by the House on July 28,
2006, and as Considered by the Senate on August 3, 2006, Prepared by
the Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (August 3, 2006) (https://
www.house.gov/jct/x-38-06.pdf).
Termination Premium
Section 8101(b) of DRA 2005 adds a new paragraph (7) to the end of
section 4006(a) of ERISA, creating a new ``termination premium'' that
applies only where certain distress and involuntary terminations occur
and then only for three years. However, although only section 4006 of
ERISA is amended, subparagraph (D) of new paragraph (7) in effect
modifies section 4007 of ERISA as well. Sections 401(b) and
402(g)(2)(B) of PPA 2006 make changes to the termination premium rules
of DRA 2005.
Termination Dates Covered
Section 8101(d)(2)(A) of DRA 2005 (which does not amend ERISA)
restricts the new termination premium to ``plans terminated after
December 31, 2005.'' (Section 401(b)(1) of PPA 2006 repeals new section
4006(a)(7)(E) of ERISA, added by DRA 2005, which provided that the
termination premium would not apply ``with respect to any plan
terminated after December 31, 2010.'')
Section 8101(d)(2)(B) of DRA 2005 further restricts the application
of the new termination premium in certain bankruptcy situations. If a
plan ``is terminated during the pendency of any bankruptcy
reorganization proceeding under chapter 11 of title 11, United States
Code (or under any similar law of a State or political subdivision of a
State),'' the new premium does not
[[Page 7757]]
apply ``if the proceeding is pursuant to a bankruptcy filing occurring
before October 18, 2005.'' Under section 402(g)(2)(B)(ii) of PPA 2006,
this limitation does not apply to an ``eligible plan'' under section
402(c)(1) of PPA 2006 (generally a plan of a commercial passenger
airline or airline catering service) while a funding election under
section 402(a)(1) of PPA 2006 is in effect for the plan.
These time restrictions on the applicability of the new premium
turn on when a plan is ``terminated.'' PBGC believes that the most
natural reading of these provisions is that the date to look to is the
termination date under section 4048 of ERISA. Focusing on the section
4048 termination date is also consistent with other provisions of DRA
2005 and implementing regulations discussed below.
Types of Terminations Covered
Under new section 4006(a)(7)(A) of ERISA, the termination premium
applies where ``there is a termination of a single-employer plan under
clause (ii) or (iii) of section 4041(c)(2)(B) [of ERISA] or section
4042 [of ERISA].'' Section 4041(c) of ERISA provides for distress
terminations; ERISA section 4042 provides for involuntary terminations.
Under ERISA section 4041(c)(1), a distress termination of a plan
may occur only if each contributing sponsor and each member of any
contributing sponsor's controlled group meets one of the ``distress
tests'' in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of section 4041(c)(2)(B). The
tests are that the person is the subject of a bankruptcy liquidation
proceeding (clause (i)), that the person is the subject of a bankruptcy
reorganization proceeding (clause (ii)), or that the person is
suffering business hardship (clause (iii)).
Although typically all contributing sponsors and controlled group
members meet the same distress test, that is not required for a
distress termination under section 4041(c). Thus, while terminations
where all contributing sponsors and controlled group members meet the
test in clause (i) seem to be excluded from applicability of the
termination premium, it is not clear from the statutory language
whether the termination premium is to apply to terminations where one
or more contributing sponsors and/or controlled group members meet the
clause (i) test but others meet the tests in clauses (ii) and/or (iii).
Examples of such situations would be where there are two contributing
sponsors, one liquidating and one reorganizing; where the sole
contributing sponsor is liquidating but there are controlled group
members that are reorganizing; and where the sole contributing sponsor
is reorganizing but the controlled group members are liquidating.
The statutory language provides no basis for distinguishing among
these examples or others that might be cited. All contributing sponsors
and controlled group members are liable for plan underfunding under
ERISA section 4062 and (as discussed below) for the termination premium
(if it applies), and they must all satisfy one or another distress test
under ERISA section 4041(c)(2)(B) for a distress termination to take
place. This suggests that all these entities should be considered
responsible as a group for the consequences of plan termination and
that the fact that one entity among several is liquidating should not
shield the others from liability. PBGC thus interprets new section
4006(a)(7)(A) of ERISA as applying the termination premium in any
distress termination case where at least one contributing sponsor or
controlled group member meets the distress test in either clause (ii)
or (iii) of section 4041(c)(2)(B) (i.e., is not liquidating).
Payers
Section 4007(a) of ERISA places responsibility for paying PBGC
premiums on the ``designated payor'' of a plan, and section
4007(e)(1)(A) of ERISA identifies the designated payor of a single-
employer plan as the contributing sponsor or plan administrator.
However, new section 4006(a)(7)(D)(i)(II) of ERISA, as added by section
8101(b) of DRA 2005, provides that notwithstanding section 4007, the
designated payor of the new termination premium is ``the person who is
the contributing sponsor as of immediately before the termination
date.'' It thus appears that the designated payor is to be identified
as of the day before the termination date under section 4048 of ERISA.
Similarly, this rule provides for identification of members of the
contributing sponsor's controlled group (which are jointly and
severally liable for premiums under section 4007(e)(2) of ERISA) as of
the same day.
Participants
Under new section 4006(a)(7)(A) of ERISA, the termination premium
is based on the number of ``participants in the plan immediately before
the termination date.'' It thus appears that participants are to be
counted--for purposes of computing the termination premium--as of the
day before the termination date under section 4048 of ERISA (the same
day on which the contributing sponsor and controlled group members are
determined). Section 4006.6 of the premium rates regulation already
includes a definition of ``participant'' (which is used in computing
the flat-rate premium), and DRA 2005 suggests no reason to depart from
that definition for purposes of the termination premium.
Due Dates
The termination premium is payable each year for three years. Under
new section 4006(a)(7)(D)(i)(I) of ERISA, as added by section 8101(b)
of DRA 2005, the new premium is due within 30 days after the beginning
of each of three ``applicable 12-month periods,'' which are in turn
described in new section 4006(a)(7)(C). New section 4006(a)(7)(C)(i)(I)
provides that in general, the first applicable 12-month period starts
with ``the first month following the month in which the termination
date occurs.'' (From this it is evident that calendar months are
meant.) Under new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(i)(II), the second and third
applicable 12-month periods are simply the two 12-month periods that
follow the first applicable 12-month period.
But new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of ERISA defers the beginning of
the first applicable 12-month period (and thus the due dates) in
certain bankruptcy reorganization cases. This deferral rule comes into
play where ``the requirements of subparagraph (B) [of new section
4006(a)(7) of ERISA] are met in connection with the termination of the
plan * * *.'' (Section 401(b)(2) of PPA 2006 corrected an erroneous
reference to ``subparagraph (B)(i)(I)'' in new section
4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of ERISA.) Subparagraph (B) of new section
4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA defers the applicability of the termination
premium for distress or involuntary plan terminations that occur when
bankruptcy reorganization proceedings are pending for terminations
``under section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) [of ERISA] or under section 4042 [of
ERISA].'' Following the same reasoning discussed above regarding new
section 4006(a)(7)(A) of ERISA (the general termination premium
applicability provision), PBGC concludes that the bankruptcy
reorganization deferral provision in new section 4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA
is meant to apply to a distress termination only when at least one
contributing sponsor or controlled group member satisfies the
bankruptcy reorganization test in section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii).
In order for the due date deferral rule in new section
4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of
[[Page 7758]]
ERISA to apply, the requirements of subparagraph (B) of section
4006(a)(7) of ERISA must be met ``with respect to 1 or more persons
described in such subparagraph'' (that is, one or more persons must be
reorganizing in bankruptcy as described in subparagraph (B)). If so,
then the first applicable 12-month period begins with ``the first month
following the month which includes the earliest date as of which each
such person is discharged or dismissed in the case described in such
clause [sic] in connection with such person.'' (The only clause
mentioned in section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) of ERISA is clause (i)(I) of
section 4006(a)(7)(C), which describes the first applicable 12-month
period that applies if the special bankruptcy rule does not. Thus the
reference to ``such clause'' appears to be intended to refer to ``such
subparagraph''--that is, subparagraph (B)--and PBGC so interprets the
reference.)
However, although subparagraph (B) of new section 4006(a)(7) of
ERISA describes a case--a bankruptcy case--it does not describe a
person. The only person mentioned in subparagraph (B) is ``such
person,'' with no cross-reference to another place where the person is
described. Nonetheless, it seems clear that the person referred to must
be a person that has a relationship to both the plan and the bankruptcy
proceeding mentioned in subparagraph (B). Subparagraph (B) contains
parenthetical language that is essentially identical to parenthetical
language that appears in section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) of ERISA (which
describes the bankruptcy reorganization test for distress
terminations). In section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii), the words ``such person''
in the parenthetical language refer to a contributing sponsor or member
of a contributing sponsor's controlled group. PBGC infers that ``such
person'' in new section 4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA is meant to refer
likewise to a contributing sponsor of the terminated plan or member of
a contributing sponsor's controlled group--determined (consistent with
the designated payor provision in new section 4007(a)(7)(D)(i)(II)) as
of the day before the termination date under section 4048 of ERISA.
This inference is supported by the observation that these same
persons--contributing sponsors and controlled group members--are the
persons liable for the termination premium. It appears that Congress'
intent was to defer the due date for the termination premium until the
persons liable to pay it were not in bankruptcy proceedings.
Accordingly, where the special bankruptcy rule for due dates applies,
it is necessary to identify every contributing sponsor and controlled
group member that was involved in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings
on the termination date and determine the date when each one left
bankruptcy--through dismissal of or discharge from the proceeding--or
ceased to exist. (If an entity ceases to exist, its failure to emerge
from bankruptcy should not postpone the termination premium due date.)
Under new section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii), the first applicable 12-month
period for the termination will then begin with the calendar month that
next begins following the last such date.
One due date issue not addressed by the statute is that the
agreement or court action establishing a plan's termination date under
ERISA section 4048 may occur well after the termination date so
established. Where a termination date is thus ``retroactively'' set,
one or more statutory due dates for the termination premium may already
have passed when the termination date becomes known. Thus, termination
premium payments could be overdue before it was determined that they
were owed.
In cases of that kind, PBGC considers it appropriate to provide
that where the termination date is set retroactively, the first
applicable 12-month period does not begin immediately after the month
in which the termination date falls, but rather begins immediately
after the month in which the termination date is established. Where the
special bankruptcy rule for due dates applies, this rule would come
into play if the termination date was established after all
contributing sponsors and controlled group members were out of
bankruptcy reorganization proceedings, and would defer the beginning of
the first applicable 12-month period until immediately after the month
in which the termination date was established.
Other Bankruptcy Issues
The parenthetical language in new section 4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA--
``(or a case described in section 4041(c)(2)(B)(i) filed by or against
such person has been converted, as of such date, to such a case in
which reorganization is sought)''--shows that Congress focused on the
fact that bankruptcy proceedings can be converted back and forth
between liquidation and reorganization proceedings. But neither section
4006(a)(7)(B) nor section 4006(a)(7)(C)(ii) (which describes the
special first applicable 12-month period) mentions conversion of a
reorganization case to a liquidation case as being sufficient to
trigger the beginning of the first applicable 12-month period. It thus
appears that even after such a conversion, the first applicable 12-
month period would be postponed until the (liquidation) bankruptcy
proceeding were dismissed or the contributing sponsor or controlled
group member discharged. This could be of significance where there were
other persons liable for the termination premium that were not (or were
no longer) in bankruptcy.
Section 8101(d)(2)(B) of DRA 2005 (which, as discussed above,
excludes from the termination premium terminations that occur during
the pendency of bankruptcy reorganization proceedings pursuant to a
filing before October 18, 2005) says nothing about the persons involved
in such proceedings. Following the reasoning above, PBGC concludes that
section 8101(d)(2)(B) is intended to apply only where the subject of a
pending bankruptcy proceeding is a contributing sponsor of the
terminated plan or a member of a contributing sponsor's controlled
group (and that these persons are to be identified as of the day before
the termination date under section 4048 of ERISA). Section
8101(d)(2)(B) also does not mention conversion of a bankruptcy case
from a liquidation proceeding to a reorganization, as new section
4006(a)(7)(B) of ERISA does. But the language of section 8101(d)(2)(B)
is consistent with the interpretation that--like section
4006(a)(7)(B)--it covers bankruptcy proceedings begun as liquidation
proceedings and converted to reorganization proceedings before the
termination date under section 4048 of ERISA.
Termination Premium Rate
Under new section 4006(a)(7) of ERISA as added by section 8101(b)
of DRA 2005, the termination premium is $1,250 per participant per year
for three years. But under section 402(g)(2)(B) of PPA 2006 (which does
not amend ERISA), the rate is increased from $1,250 to $2,500 where a
commercial passenger airline or airline catering service elects funding
relief (an extended underfunding amortization period and lenient
assumptions for valuing liabilities) for a frozen plan under section
402(a)(1) of PPA 2006, if the plan terminates during the first five
years of the funding relief period, unless the Secretary of Labor
determines that the termination resulted from extraordinary
circumstances such as a terrorist attack or other similar event.
Regulatory Provisions
This rule would add a new Sec. 4006.7 to the premium rates
regulation
[[Page 7759]]
providing that the amount of the termination premium with respect to
each applicable 12-month period is the premium rate (generally $1,250)
times the number of participants, determined as of the day before the
termination date, with a cross-reference from Sec. 4006.3 (where the
flat and variable premium rates are set forth). New Sec. 4006.7(b)
also explains the circumstances in which the termination premium rate
is $2,500 rather than $1,250. In addition, the rule would add a new
Sec. 4007.13 to the premium payment regulation (with a cross-reference
from Sec. 4006.7), where the rest of the provisions about the
termination premium are found.
New Sec. 4007.13 contains provisions specific to the termination
premium, and it supplements provisions in existing sections of Part
4007 that also apply to the termination premium. Section 4007.13(a)
describes when the termination premium applies; Sec. 4007.13 (d), (e),
and (f) deal with due dates; Sec. 4007.13(g) deals with what persons
are liable for the termination premium. The provisions on these three
topics reflect the discussions above.
Section 4007.13(b) makes each contributing sponsor and controlled
group member (determined as of the day before the termination date
under section 4048 of ERISA) responsible for filing required
termination premium information and payments, and (where there is more
than one such person) provides that any one can file on behalf of all
of them. This provision ensures that, so long as there is at least one
person still in existence that is liable for the termination premium,
there will be at least one identifiable entity with responsibility to
file. This provision is similar to Sec. 4010.3 of PBGC's regulation on
Annual Financial and Actuarial Information Reporting (Part 4010 of
PBGC's regulations) and Sec. 4043.3(a) of PBGC's regulation on
Reportable Events and Certain Other Notification Requirements (Part
4043 of PBGC's regulations). Thus, only a single filing of the premium
and required premium information is required, but if it is not timely
made, PBGC could seek enforcement against any or all contributing
sponsors and controlled group members.
Section 4007.13(c) provides for a discretionary ``facts-and-
circumstances'' penalty for failure to pay the termination premium
timely, instead of the automatic 1 percent or 5 percent penalty that
applies to late payment of flat- and variable-rate premiums under Sec.
4007.8(a). PBGC wants to preserve flexibility in penalizing failures to
pay the new premium in full and on time while it gains experience with
the new premium. The penalty is limited to 100 percent of the amount of
termination premium not timely filed.
In addition, this rule would amend several sections in the existing
premium payment regulation to eliminate inconsistencies or potential
inconsistencies between existing language in those sections and the
termination premium provisions.
Technical Changes
PBGC is taking this opportunity to make some technical changes
(unrelated to DRA 2005 or PPA 2006) to its regulations on Premium Rates
and Payment of Premiums.
Section 4006.3 of the premium rates regulation refers to basic
benefits guaranteed under section 4022(a) of ERISA (which relates only
to single-employer plans) and omits mention of section 4022A(a) of
ERISA (which relates to multi-employer plans). This rule would add a
reference to section 4022A(a).
Section 4007.11(d) of the premium payment regulation states that
where proration of the flat- and variable-rate premiums is available
under Sec. 4006.5(f) of the premium rates regulation, the un-prorated
premium must be paid in full (even if the plan would be entitled to a
refund). This provision is anachronistic: PBGC now permits payment of
the prorated amount under Sec. 4006.5(f), rather than requiring that a
filer pay the un-prorated amount and request a refund. This rule would
remove the outdated provision.
Section 4007.11(e) of the premium payment regulation permits PBGC
to return improper filings and consider them not made. PBGC is not
exercising this authority, and the provision is unnecessary; PBGC has
authority to assess penalties under ERISA section 4071 for failure to
submit material information under the premium payment regulation. This
rule would remove Sec. 4007.11(e).
Applicability
The regulatory changes made by this rule to implement the
provisions of section 8101 of DRA 2005 would apply (as section 8101 of
DRA 2005 does) to plan years beginning after 2005 and to terminations
with termination dates after 2005 (subject to the special rule for
bankruptcies filed before October 18, 2005). The regulatory changes
made by this rule to implement the provisions of section 405 of PPA
2006 would apply (as section 405 of PPA 2006 does) to plan years
beginning after 2006.
Compliance With Rulemaking Guidelines
The PBGC has determined, in consultation with the Office of
Management and Budget, that this proposed rule is a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866. The Office of
Management and Budget, therefore, has reviewed the rule under Executive
Order 12866.
PBGC certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act that the amendments in this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule
implements statutory changes made by Congress. It provides guidance on
how to calculate, pay, and substantiate the premiums prescribed by
statute and imposes no significant burden beyond the burden imposed by
statute. Furthermore:
The statutorily imposed increase in the flat-rate premium
is at most $11 per participant per year, which does not constitute a
significant economic impact where a plan has a small number of
participants. Although the flat-rate premium will increase as the
number of participants increases, the economic impact of the flat-rate
premium relative to the size of the entity will remain fairly constant
and will not be significant for a substantial number of entities of any
size.
The statutorily imposed cap on the variable-rate premium
will save qualifying plans money. The rule simply interprets the
statutory provisions.
The statutorily imposed termination premium will not
affect a substantial number of entities of any size.
Accordingly, as provided in section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603 and 604 do not apply.
The information requirements relating to the flat-rate and
variable-rate premiums have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (OMB control number 1212-
0009, expires April 30, 2008).
PBGC is submitting the information requirements relating to the
termination premium to the Office of Management and Budget for review
and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Copies of PBGC's
request may be obtained free of charge by contacting the Disclosure
Division of the Office of the General Counsel of PBGC, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202-326-4040.
PBGC needs this information to identify the plan for which a
termination premium is paid to PBGC,
[[Page 7760]]
to verify the determination of the premium, and to identify the persons
liable for the premium.
PBGC expects that it will receive termination premium filings from
about 30 contributing sponsors or controlled group members annually and
that the total annual burden of the collection of information will be
about 40 hours and $264,000.
Comments on the paperwork provisions under this proposed rule
should be mailed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Washington, DC 20503. Although comments
may be submitted through April 23, 2007, the Office of Management and
Budget requests that comments be received on or before March 22, 2007
to ensure their consideration. Comments may address (among other
things)--
Whether the proposed collection of information is needed
for the proper performance of PBGC's functions and will have practical
utility;
The accuracy of PBGC's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancement of the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4006
Pension insurance, Pensions.
29 CFR Part 4007
Penalties, Pension insurance, Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons given above, PBGC is amending 29 CFR parts 4006 and
4007 as follows.
PART 4006--PREMIUM RATES
1. The authority citation for part 4006 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1306, 1307.
2. In Sec. 4006.3:
a. The introductory text is amended by removing the words ``Sec.
4006.5 (dealing with exemptions and special rules)'' and adding in
their place the words ``Sec. 4006.5 (dealing with exemptions and
special rules) and Sec. 4006.7 (dealing with premiums for certain
terminated single-employer plans)''; and by removing the words
``section 4022(a)'' and adding in their place the words ``section
4022(a) or section 4022A(a)''.
b. Paragraph (a) introductory text is amended by removing the words
``multiplied by--'' and adding in their place the words ``multiplied by
the applicable flat premium rate determined under paragraph (c) of this
section.''.
c. Paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) are removed.
d. Paragraph (b) is revised, and new paragraphs (c) and (d) are
added, to read as follows:
Sec. 4006.3 Premium rate.
* * * * *
(b) Variable-rate premium.
(1) In general. Subject to the limitation in paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, the variable-rate premium is $9 for each $1,000 of a
single-employer plan's unfunded vested benefits, as determined under
Sec. 4006.4.
(2) Cap on variable-rate premium. If a plan is described in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section for the premium payment year, the
variable-rate premium does not exceed $5 multiplied by the square of
the number of participants in the plan on the last day of the plan year
preceding the premium payment year. For example, if the number of
participants in the plan on the last day of the plan year preceding the
premium payment year is 20, the variable-rate premium does not exceed
$2,000 ($5 x 20\2\ = $5 x 400 = $2,000).
(3) Plans eligible for cap. A plan is described in this paragraph
(b)(3) for the premium payment year if the aggregate number of
employees of all employers in the plan's controlled group on the first
day of the premium payment year is 25 or fewer.
(4) Meaning of ``employee.'' For purposes of paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, the aggregate number of employees is determined in the
same manner as under section 410(b)(1) of the Code, taking into account
the provisions of section 414(m) and (n) of the Code, but without
regard to section 410(b)(3), (4), and (5) of the Code.
(c) Applicable flat premium rate. The applicable flat premium rate
is:
(1) For a premium payment year beginning before 2006--
(i) For a single-employer plan, $19, and
(ii) For a multiemployer plan, $2.60.
(2) For a premium payment year beginning in 2006--
(i) For a single-employer plan, $30, and
(ii) For a multiemployer plan, $8.
(3) For a premium payment year beginning after 2006, the greater
of--
(i) The applicable flat premium rate for plan years beginning in
the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the premium
payment year begins, or
(ii) The adjusted flat rate determined under paragraph (d) of this
section for the premium payment year.
(d) Adjusted flat rate. The adjusted flat rate for a premium
payment year beginning after 2006 is determined by--
(1) Multiplying the applicable flat premium rate for 2006 by the
ratio of--
(i) The national average wage index (as defined in section
209(k)(1) of the Social Security Act) for the first of the two calendar
years preceding the calendar year in which the premium payment year
begins, to
(ii) The national average wage index (as so defined) for 2004; and
(2) Rounding the result to the nearest multiple of $1 (rounding up
any unrounded result that equals some whole number of dollars plus 50
cents).
3. New Sec. 4006.7 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 4006.7 Premium rate for certain terminated single-employer
plans.
(a) The premium under this section (``termination premium'')
applies to a DRA 2005 termination described in Sec. 4007.13 of this
chapter.
(b) The amount of the premium under this section that is payable
with respect to each applicable 12-month period (as described in Sec.
4007.13 of this chapter) is the number of participants in the plan,
determined as of the day before the termination date under section 4048
of ERISA, multiplied by the termination premium rate. In general, the
termination premium rate is $1,250. However, the termination premium
rate is $2,500 for an ``eligible plan'' under section 402(c)(1) of the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (dealing with certain plans of
commercial passenger airlines and airline catering services) while an
election under section 402(a)(1) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006
(dealing with alternative funding schedules) is in effect for the plan
if the plan terminates during the five-year period beginning on the
first day of the first applicable plan year (as defined in section
402(c)(2) of that Act) with respect to the plan, unless the Secretary
of Labor determines that the plan terminated as a result of
extraordinary circumstances such as a terrorist attack or other similar
event.
[[Page 7761]]
(c) The premium under this section is in addition to any other
premium under this part.
(d) See Sec. 4007.13 of this chapter for further rules about
termination premiums.
PART 4007--PAYMENT OF PREMIUMS
4. The authority citation for part 4007 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1303(a), 1306, 1307.
5. Section 4007.3 is amended by removing the words ``The plan
administrator'' and adding in their place the words ``Subject to the
provisions of Sec. 4007.13, the plan administrator''; and by removing
``Sec. 4007.11'' and adding in its place the words ``this part''.
6. In Sec. 4007.7, paragraph (a) is amended by removing ``Sec.
4007.11'' and adding in its place the words ``this part''.
7. In Sec. 4007.8:
a. Paragraph (a) introductory text is amended by removing the words
``If any premium payment due'' and adding in their place the words
``Subject to the provisions of Sec. 4007.13, if any premium payment
due''; and by removing ``Sec. 4007.11'' and adding in its place the
words ``this part''.
b. Paragraph (a)(1)(i) is amended by removing the word ``plan's''.
c. Paragraph (a)(1) introductory text is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 4007.8 Late payment penalty charges.
(a) Penalty charge. * * *
(1) Penalty rate; in general. Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, the penalty rate is--
* * * * *
8. In Sec. 4007.9, paragraph (a) is amended by removing the words
``by a plan administrator''; and by removing the words ``that plan's''
and adding in their place the words ``a plan's''.
9. In Sec. 4007.10:
a. Paragraph (a)(1) is amended by removing the words ``plan
administrator'' and adding in their place the words ``designated
recordkeeper under paragraph (a)(3) of this section''.
b. Paragraph (a)(2) is amended by removing the words ``The plan
administrator'' and adding in their place the words ``A designated
recordkeeper''.
c. Paragraph (b) is amended by removing the words ``for any premium
payment year''.
d. Paragraph (c)(1) is amended by removing the words ``The plan
administrator'' and adding in their place the words ``A designated
recordkeeper''.
e. Paragraph (c)(2) is amended by removing the words ``the plan
administrator'' and adding in their place the words ``a designated
recordkeeper''.
f. Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) is amended by removing the words ``plan
administrator'' and adding in their place the words ``designated
recordkeeper''.
g. New paragraph (a)(3) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 4007.10 Recordkeeping; audits; disclosure of information.
(a) Retention of records to support premium payments.
* * * * *
(3) Designated recordkeepers.
(i) With respect to the flat-rate and variable-rate premiums
described in Sec. 4006.3 of this chapter, the plan administrator is
the designated recordkeeper.
(ii) With respect to the premium for certain terminated single-
employer plans described in Sec. 4006.7 of this chapter, each person
who was a contributing sponsor of such a plan, or was a member of a
contributing sponsor's controlled group, as of the day before the
plan's termination date is a designated recordkeeper.
* * * * *
10. In Sec. 4007.11:
a. Paragraph (a) introductory text is amended by removing the words
``The premium filing due date for small plans'' and adding in their
place the words ``For flat-rate and variable-rate premiums, the premium
filing due date for small plans''.
b. Paragraph (a)(3) introductory text is amended by removing the
words ``the premium form or forms and payment or payments for the short
plan year shall be filed by'' and adding in their place the words ``the
due date or dates for the flat-rate premium and any variable-rate
premium for the short plan year are''; and by removing the words ``for
the premium forms and payments''.
c. Paragraph (c) introductory text is amended by removing the words
``the premium form and all premium payments due for the first plan year
of coverage of any new plan or newly covered plan shall be filed on or
before'' and adding in their place the words ``the due date for the
flat-rate premium and any variable-rate premium for the first plan year
of coverage of any new plan or newly covered plan shall be''.
d. Paragraph (d) is amended by removing the words ``to file the
forms or forms prescribed by this part and to pay any premiums due''
and adding in their place the words ``to make flat-rate and (as
applicable) variable-rate premium filings and payments under this
part''; and by removing the last sentence of the paragraph (beginning
``The entire * * *'' and ending ``* * * Sec. 4006.5(f).'').
e. Paragraph (e) is removed.
11. In Sec. 4007.12, paragraph (a) is amended by removing the
words ``to file the applicable forms and to submit the premium
payment'' and adding in their place the words ``to make flat-rate and
variable-rate premium filings and payments under this part''; and by
removing the words ``liable for premium payments'' and adding in their
place ``liable for flat-rate and variable-rate premium payments''.
12. New Sec. 4007.13 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 4007.13 Premiums for certain terminated single-employer plans.
(a) Applicability.
(1) In general. This section applies where there is a ``DRA 2005
termination'' of a plan. Subject to paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
there is a DRA 2005 termination where a single-employer plan's
termination date under section 4048 of ERISA is after 2005 and either--
(i) The plan terminates under section 4042 of ERISA, or
(ii) The plan terminates under section 4041(c) of ERISA and at
least one contributing sponsor or member of a contributing sponsor's
controlled group meets the requirements of section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) or
(iii) of ERISA.
(2) Plans terminated during reorganization proceedings. Except as
provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a DRA 2005 termination of
a plan does not occur where as of the plan's termination date under
section 4048 of ERISA--
(i) A bankruptcy proceeding has been filed by or against any person
that was a contributing sponsor of the plan on the day before the
plan's termination date or that was on that day a member of any
controlled group of which any such contributing sponsor was a member,
(ii) The proceeding is pending as a reorganization proceeding under
chapter 11 of title 11, United States Code (or under any similar law of
a State or political subdivision of a State),
(iii) The person has not been discharged from the proceeding, and
(iv) The proceeding was filed before October 18, 2005.
(3) Special rule for certain airline-related plans. Paragraph
(a)(2) of this section does not apply to an ``eligible plan'' under
section 402(c)(1) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (dealing with
certain plans of commercial passenger airlines and airline catering
services) while an election under section 402(a)(1) of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (dealing with alternative funding schedules) is
in effect for the plan.
[[Page 7762]]
(4) Termination premium. A premium as described in Sec. 4006.7 of
this chapter is payable to PBGC with respect to a DRA 2005 termination
each year for three years after the termination (the ``termination
premium'').
(b) Filing requirements; method of filing. Notwithstanding Sec.
4007.3, in the case of a DRA 2005 termination of a plan, each person
that was a contributing sponsor of the plan on the day before the
plan's termination date or that was on that day a member of any
controlled group of which any such contributing sponsor was a member is
responsible for filing prescribed termination premium information and
payments. Any such person may file on behalf of all such persons.
(c) Late payment penalty charges. Notwithstanding Sec. 4007.8(a),
if any required termination premium payment is not filed by the due
date under paragraph (d) of this section, PBGC may assess a late
payment penalty charge based on the facts and circumstances, subject to
waiver under Sec. 4007.8(b), (c), (d), or (e). The charge will not
exceed the amount of termination premium not timely filed.
(d) Due dates. Notwithstanding Sec. 4007.11, the due date for the
termination premium is the 30th day of each of three applicable 12-
month periods. The three applicable 12-month periods with respect to a
DRA 2005 termination of a plan are--
(1) First applicable 12-month period. Except as provided in
paragraph (e) or (f) of this section, the period of 12 calendar months
beginning with the first calendar month following the calendar month in
which occurs the plan's termination date under section 4048 of ERISA,
and
(2) Subsequent applicable 12-month periods. Each of the first two
periods of 12 calendar months that immediately follow the first
applicable 12-month period.
(e) Certain reorganization cases.
(1) This paragraph (e) applies with respect to a DRA 2005
termination of a plan if the conditions in both paragraph (e)(2) and
paragraph (e)(3) of this section are satisfied.
(2) The condition of this paragraph (e)(2) is that either--
(i) The plan terminates under section 4042 of ERISA, or
(ii) The plan terminates under section 4041(c) of ERISA and at
least one contributing sponsor or member of a contributing sponsor's
controlled group meets the requirements of section 4041(c)(2)(B)(ii) of
ERISA.
(3) The condition of this paragraph (e)(3) is that as of the plan's
termination date under section 4048 of ERISA--
(i) A bankruptcy proceeding has been filed by or against any person
that was a contributing sponsor of the plan on the day before the
plan's termination date or that was on that day a member of any
controlled group of which any such contributing sponsor was a member,
(ii) The proceeding is pending as a reorganization proceeding under
chapter 11 of title 11, United States Code (or under any similar law of
a State or political subdivision of a State), and
(iii) The person has not been discharged from the proceeding.
(4) If this paragraph (e) applies with respect to a DRA 2005
termination of a plan, then except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
section, the first applicable 12-month period with respect to the plan
is the period of 12 calendar months beginning with the first calendar
month following the calendar month in which occurs the earliest date
when, for every person that was a contributing sponsor of the plan on
the day before the plan's termination date under section 4048 of ERISA,
or that was on that day a member of any controlled group of which any
such contributing sponsor was a member, either--
(i) There is not pending any bankruptcy proceeding that was filed
by or against such person and that was, as of the plan's termination
date under section 4048 of ERISA, a reorganization proceeding under
chapter 11 of title 11, United States Code (or under any similar law of
a State or political subdivision of a State), or
(ii) The person has been discharged from any such proceeding, or
(iii) The person no longer exists.
(f) Retroactive plan termination date. If a plan's termination date
under section 4048 of ERISA is in the past when it is established by
agreement or court action as described in section 4048 of ERISA, then
the first applicable 12-month period for determining the due dates of
the termination premium begins with the later of--
(1) The first calendar month following the calendar month in which
the termination date is established by agreement or court action as
described in section 4048 of ERISA, or
(2) The first calendar month specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section or (if paragraph (e) of this section applies) paragraph (e)(4)
of this section.
(g) Liability for termination premiums. In the case of a DRA 2005
termination of a plan, each person that was a contributing sponsor of
the plan on the day before the plan's termination date, or that was on
that day a member of any controlled group of which any such
contributing sponsor was a member, is jointly and severally liable for
termination premiums with respect to the plan.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 13th day of February, 2007.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Interim Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7-2812 Filed 2-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-01-P