New Standards for Domestic Mailing Services, 7695 [E7-2825]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 32 / Friday, February 16, 2007 / Notices
performing an acceptance review of ERs
submitted as part of a license renewal
application.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Background and Discussion
The NRC staff routinely reviews ERs
against the requirements of 10 CFR
51.45 and 10 CFR 51.53(c) as part of the
acceptance review of reactor license
renewal applications. Staff review
guidance governing reactor license
renewal environmental reviews and the
preparation of environmental impact
statements is provided in NUREG–1555,
Standard Review Plans for
Environmental Reviews for Nuclear
Power Plants, Supplement 1: Operating
License Renewal.
In conducting its acceptance review,
the staff also relies on the guidance
provided to applicants in Regulatory
Guide 4.2, Supplement 1, Preparation of
Supplemental Environmental Reports
for Applications to Renew Nuclear
Power Plant Operating Licenses. The
regulatory guide provides methods
acceptable to the staff for implementing
the provisions of 10 CFR 51.45 and 10
CFR 51.53(c). While conformance with
the suggested format of the regulatory
guide is not required, use of the guide
is expected to ensure the completeness
of the information provided, assist the
NRC staff and others in locating
information, and result in more efficient
and timely NRC staff review.
Proposed Action
The acceptance review checklist for
ERs submitted with license renewal
applications, available via ADAMS at
Accession No. ML063190452, will be
incorporated into the next revision of
NUREG–1555, Supplement 1. The
acceptance checklist is intended to be a
tool to ensure efficiency and
consistency in the staff’s acceptance
reviews and ensure that all necessary
components of license renewal stage
ERs are submitted in accordance with
governing regulations. As noted in the
checklist instructions, the absence of
any of the information recommended in
Regulatory Guide 4.2, Supplement 1,
would not require that supplemental
information be provided prior to
acceptance of an application; however,
applicants should expect that the
absence of such information may result
in more intensive environmental audit
activities and/or issuance of early
requests for additional information to
support the staff’s review. The
docketing and subsequent finding of a
timely and sufficient application
(including the ER) does not preclude
NRC reviewers from requesting
additional information as a review
proceeds, nor does it predict the NRC’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:03 Feb 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
final determination regarding the
approval or denial of a license renewal
application. This proposed LR–ISG is
not intended to substitute or re-interpret
requirements outlined in 10 CFR 51.45
and 10 CFR 51.53(c). The checklist is
also expected to serve as a knowledge
management tool for NRC staff members
by specifying review criteria in a
simplified, user-friendly format.
[FR Doc. E7–2785 Filed 2–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
New Standards for Domestic Mailing
Services
Postal Service.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On January 17, 2007, the
Postal Service published an updated
proposal in the Federal Register (72 FR
2089) providing new mailing standards
to accompany the R2006–1 price change
proposal currently before the Postal
Regulatory Commission. We posted a
new document on our Web site at
https://www.usps.com/ratecase to
respond to the comments we received
on our January proposal and to further
revise the proposed mailing standards.
In addition to the new document, you
can find our earlier proposals at
https://www.usps.com/ratecase, along
with side-by-side comparisons of
today’s prices and those that are
currently under review by the Postal
Regulatory Commission. Our Web site
also provides helpful information for
mailers, including frequently asked
questions, press releases, and Mailers
Companion and MailPro articles related
to the pricing change. We encourage you
to review our proposed mailing
standards and use our electronic tools as
you prepare for the pricing change.
DATES: The document is available
beginning February 14, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Walker, 202–268–7261.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E7–2825 Filed 2–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Agency Forms Submitted for OMB
Review, Request for Comments
Summary
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7695
Board (RRB) is forwarding an
Information Collection Request (ICR) to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to request a revision
to the following collection of
information: 3220–0025, RUIA
Investigations and Continuing
Entitlement, consisting of RRB Form(s)
UI–9, Applicant’s Statement of
Employment and Wages, UI–23,
Claimant’s Statement of Service, UI–44,
Claim for Credit for Military Service,
ID–4F, Advising of Ineligibility for
RUIA Benefits, ID–4U, Advising of
Service/Earnings Requirements for
RUIA Benefits, ID–4Y, Advising of
Ineligibility for Sickness Benefits, ID–
4X, Advising of Service/Earnings
Requirements for Sickness Benefits, ID–
20–1, Advising that Normal
Unemployment Benefits Are About to
Be Exhausted, ID–20–2, Advising that
Normal Sickness Benefits Are About to
Be Exhausted, ID–20–4, Advising That
Normal Sickness Benefits Are About to
Be Exhausted/Non-Entitlement, ID–5I,
Letter to Non-Railroad Employers on
Employment and Earnings of a
Claimant, ID–5R (SUP), Report of
Employees Paid RUIA Benefits for Every
Day in Month Reported as Month of
Creditable Service, ID–49R, Letter to
Railroad Employers for Payroll
Information, and UI–48, Claimant’s
Statement Regarding Benefit Claim for
Days of Employment. Our ICR describes
the information we seek to collect from
the public. Review and approval by
OIRA ensures that we impose
appropriate paperwork burdens.
The RRB invites comments on the
proposed collection of information to
determine (1) The practical utility of the
collection; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden of the collection; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information that is the
subject of collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of collections on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments to RRB or OIRA must contain
the OMB control number of the ICR. For
proper consideration of your comments,
it is best if RRB and OIRA receive them
within 30 days of publication date.
Previous Requests for Comments
The RRB has already published the
initial 60-day notice (71 FR 66991 on
November 17, 2006) required by 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That request elicited
no comments.
Information Collection Request (ICR)
Title: RUIA Investigations and
Continuing Entitlement.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 32 (Friday, February 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2825]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
New Standards for Domestic Mailing Services
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On January 17, 2007, the Postal Service published an updated
proposal in the Federal Register (72 FR 2089) providing new mailing
standards to accompany the R2006-1 price change proposal currently
before the Postal Regulatory Commission. We posted a new document on
our Web site at https://www.usps.com/ratecase to respond to the
comments we received on our January proposal and to further revise the
proposed mailing standards.
In addition to the new document, you can find our earlier proposals
at https://www.usps.com/ratecase, along with side-by-side comparisons
of today's prices and those that are currently under review by the
Postal Regulatory Commission. Our Web site also provides helpful
information for mailers, including frequently asked questions, press
releases, and Mailers Companion and MailPro articles related to the
pricing change. We encourage you to review our proposed mailing
standards and use our electronic tools as you prepare for the pricing
change.
DATES: The document is available beginning February 14, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Walker, 202-268-7261.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E7-2825 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
