Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; Sea Turtle Conservation Requirements, 7382-7384 [E7-2719]
Download as PDF
7382
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
as accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we request comments or
information from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, industry, or any
other interested party concerning the
proposed rule. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
(1) Information on taxonomy,
distribution, habitat selection
(especially denning habitat), food
habits, population density and trends,
habitat trends, and effects of
management on polar bears;
(2) Information on the effects of sea
ice change on the distribution and
abundance of polar bears and their
principal prey over the short and long
term;
(3) Information on the effects of other
potential listing factors, including oil
and gas development, contaminants,
ecotourism, hunting, and poaching, on
the distribution and abundance of polar
bears and their principal prey over the
short and long term;
(4) Information on regulatory
mechanisms and management programs
for polar bear conservation, including
mitigation measures related to oil and
gas exploration and development,
hunting conservation programs, antipoaching programs, and any other
private, tribal, or governmental
conservation programs that benefit polar
bears;
(5) The specific physical and
biological features to consider, and
specific areas that may meet the
definition of critical habitat and that
should or should not be considered for
a proposed critical habitat designation
as provided by section 4 of the
Endangered Species Act;
(6) Information relevant to whether
any populations of the species may
qualify as distinct population segments;
and
(7) The data and studies referred to
within the proposal.
Author
The author of this notice is Charles S.
Hamilton, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Authority
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
The authority for this notice is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: February 2, 2007.
Mamie A. Parker,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 07–723 Filed 2–13–07; 11:21 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:53 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Docket No. 070122014–7014–01; I.D.
011907A]
fax 727–824–5309, e-mail
Michael.Barnette@noaa.gov), Ellen
Keane (ph. 978–281–9300 x6526, fax
978–281–9394, e-mail
Ellen.Keane@noaa.gov), or Tanya
Dobrzynski (ph. 301–713–2322, fax
(301) 427–2522, e-mail
Tanya.Dobrzynski@noaa.gov).
RIN 0648–AV04
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 223
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife;
Sea Turtle Conservation Requirements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this advance
notice of proposed rulemaking to
announce that it is considering
amendments to the regulatory
requirements for turtle excluder devices
(TEDs). Specific changes NMFS is
considering include increasing the size
of the TED escape opening currently
required in the summer flounder
fishery; requiring the use of TEDs in the
flynet, whelk, calico scallop, and MidAtlantic sea scallop trawl fisheries; and
moving the current northern boundary
of the Summer Flounder Fishery-Sea
Turtle Protection Area off Cape Charles,
Virginia, to a point farther north. The
objective of the proposed measures
would be to effectively protect all life
stages and species of sea turtle in
Atlantic trawl fisheries where they are
vulnerable to incidental capture and
mortality. NMFS is seeking public
comment on these potential
amendments to the TED regulations.
NMFS is also soliciting public comment
on the need for, and development and
implementation of, other methods to
reduce bycatch of sea turtles in any
commercial or recreational fishery in
the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico where
sea turtle conservation measures do not
currently exist.
DATES: Comments will be accepted
through March 19, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this
action and requests for literature cited
should be addressed to Michael
Barnette, Southeast Regional Office,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg,
FL 33701. Comments may also be sent
via fax to 727–824–5309, via email to
0648–AV04@noaa.gov, or to the Federal
eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (follow
instructions for submitting comments).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Barnette (ph. 727–824–5312,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Background
All sea turtles that occur in U.S.
waters are listed as either endangered or
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) are
listed as endangered. Loggerhead
(Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia
mydas) turtles are listed as threatened,
except for breeding populations of green
turtles in Florida and on the Pacific
coast of Mexico, which are listed as
endangered. Incidental capture of sea
turtles in fisheries (bycatch) is a primary
factor hampering the recovery of sea
turtles in the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico.
To address this factor
comprehensively, NMFS has initiated a
Strategy for Sea Turtle Conservation and
Recovery in Relation to Atlantic Ocean
and Gulf of Mexico Fisheries (Strategy).
The Strategy is a gear-based approach to
addressing sea turtle bycatch. Certain
types of fishing gear are more prone to
the incidental capture of sea turtles than
others, depending on the design of the
gear, the way the gear is fished, and/or
the time and area within which it is
fished. An evaluation of sea turtle
interactions by gear type provides a
more comprehensive assessment of
fishery impacts across fishing sectors as
well as across state, federal, and
regional boundaries. Through this
strategy, NMFS seeks to address sea
turtle bycatch across jurisdictional
boundaries and fisheries for gear types
that have the greatest impact on sea
turtle populations.
Through the Strategy and based on
documented sea turtle-fishery
interactions, NMFS has identified trawl
gear as a priority for reducing sea turtle
bycatch. Trawling is a method of fishing
that involves actively towing a net
through the water behind one or more
boats. Because trawl gear is towed, it
has the capability to incidentally
capture sea turtles and other species
that are not the intended target of the
fishery. The likelihood of incidental
capture is inherent in the basic design
of trawls, regardless of the specific
fishery. Trawl fisheries with
documented observer coverage or
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
historical bycatch information that
occur in known areas and times of sea
turtle distribution have consistently
been shown to capture sea turtles. In
fact, trawling is often used as a means
to capture sea turtles for research,
distribution studies, and relocation
because of the effectiveness of this
method. Without an avenue for escape,
sea turtles are likely to drown when
captured in trawl gear due to forced
submergence. Even when drowning
does not occur, the stresses of forced
submergence have been shown to result
in various negative physiological
consequences that can make the turtles
susceptible to later capture, predation,
boat strike or other sources of injury and
mortality. NMFS is now working to
develop and implement bycatch
reduction measures in all trawl fisheries
in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico when
and where sea turtle takes have
occurred or where gear, time, location,
fishing method, and other similarities
exist between a particular trawl fishery
and a trawl fishery where sea turtle
takes have occurred. TEDs have been
proven an effective method to minimize
adverse effects related to sea turtle
bycatch in the shrimp trawl fishery and,
where applicable, in the summer
flounder trawl fishery. While TEDs have
potential as a bycatch reduction device
for other trawl fisheries, differences in
trawl designs and fishing methods may
necessitate modifications or adjustments
to the design of existing TEDs before
they can be applied in other trawl
fisheries. Testing is necessary to ensure
that feasible TED designs for specific
fisheries still accomplish the desired sea
turtle bycatch reduction goals and to
determine the TED’s impact on target
catch retention. It is possible that TEDs
may not be feasible for some trawl
fisheries. In the event that TEDs are not
a viable option, other management
measures such as tow time restrictions
and time/area closures may need to be
considered. Given these issues, NMFS
anticipates a phased approach to
implementation of any regulations to
address sea turtle bycatch in trawl
fisheries as the information needed to
support measures in each individual
trawl type becomes available.
The incidental take of sea turtles in
certain trawl fisheries has been
documented in the Gulf of Mexico and
Atlantic. Under the ESA and its
implementing regulations, taking sea
turtles is prohibited, with exceptions
identified in 50 CFR 223.206. The
incidental taking of threatened sea
turtles during shrimp or summer
flounder trawling is exempted from the
taking prohibition of section 9 of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:53 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
ESA if the conservation measures
specified in the sea turtle conservation
regulations (50 CFR 223.206(d)) are
followed. The conservation regulations
require most shrimp trawlers and
summer flounder trawlers operating in
the southeastern United States (Atlantic
Area and Gulf Area) to have a NMFSapproved TED installed in each net that
is rigged for fishing to provide for the
escape of sea turtles. TEDs currently
approved by NMFS include single-grid
hard TEDs and hooped hard TEDs
conforming to a generic description, two
types of special hard TEDs (the flounder
TED and the weedless TED), and one
type of soft TED (the Parker soft TED).
TEDs have an escape opening, usually
covered by a webbing flap, that allows
sea turtles to escape from trawl nets. To
be approved for use by NMFS, a TED
design must be shown to be 97 percent
effective in excluding sea turtles during
experimental TED testing. TEDs must
meet generic criteria based upon certain
parameters of TED design,
configuration, and installation,
including height and width dimensions
of the TED opening through which the
turtles escape.
In order to allow the release of
leatherback and large loggerhead sea
turtles, NMFS required the use of large
escape openings in the shrimp fishery in
February 2003 (68 FR 8456; February
21, 2003). The February 2003
regulations required the use of either the
double cover flap TED, a TED with a
minimum opening of 71 inch (180 cm)
straight-line stretched mesh, or the
Parker soft TED with a minimum 96–
inch (244–cm) opening in offshore
waters (from the COLREGS demarcation
line seaward) and in all inshore waters
off of Georgia and South Carolina; and
required a TED with a minimum
opening of 44 inch (112 cm) straightline stretched mesh with a 20 inch (51
cm) vertical taut height in all inshore
waters (from the COLREGS Demarcation
line landward) except for the inshore
waters of Georgia and South Carolina.
At this time, the large-opening TED is
only required in the shrimp trawl
fishery.
Summer Flounder Fishery
Since 1992, all vessels using bottom
trawls to fish for summer flounder in
specific times and areas off Virginia and
North Carolina have been required to
use NMFS-approved TEDs in their nets
(57 FR 57358, December 4, 1992; 50 CFR
223.206(d)(2)(iii)). Currently, the escape
opening requirements for the flounder
TED are ≤35 inches (≤89 cm) in width
and ≤12 inches (≤30 cm) in height (50
CFR 223.207(b)(1)). Although the
February 2003 final rule (68 FR 8456) to
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7383
require the larger opening in the shrimp
trawl fishery did not require vessels in
the summer flounder trawl fishery to
use the larger escape opening sizes, the
rule stated NMFS was evaluating the
need for such restrictions in this fishery.
The smaller opening currently used in
this fishery is insufficient to allow the
escapement of leatherback sea turtles
and larger loggerhead and green sea
turtles. The larger opening TEDs have
passed the NMFS testing criteria for
turtle escapement and NMFS has
conducted testing of the larger opening
in the Mid-Atlantic summer flounder
trawl fishery since 2003.
NMFS is currently considering an
option to modify TED regulations in the
summer flounder trawl fishery to
require a larger escape opening. The
larger escape opening would have a
142–inch (361–cm) circumference with
a corresponding 71–inch (180–cm)
straight line stretched measurement.
This option is expected to decrease
escape times for all turtles and allow for
the release of leatherbacks and all large
loggerhead and green sea turtles. The
larger opening would be consistent with
sea turtle conservation measures
currently in place in the shrimp trawl
fishery.
Whelk and Calico Scallop Trawl
Fisheries
The whelk trawl fishery originally
developed off the South Carolina coast
during 1977 and the spring of 1978 as
an alternative fishery during closures in
the shrimp season. Trawling for
knobbed and channeled whelk typically
occurs from mid-February through midApril. Currently, less than 35
commercial fishermen actively
participate in the fishery with five or
more trips each year, although as many
as 100 permits have been issued by the
Georgia Department of Natural
Resources (GDNR).
Due to documented sea turtle
interactions within the fishery, NMFS
evaluated potential TED designs for the
fishery in 2000–2001. The whelk TED
was developed in cooperation with
GDNR and the University of Georgia
Marine Extension Service in an effort to
provide nearshore whelk fishermen
with a TED that would allow the target
species to pass through the TED frame
and be retained as catch. The whelk
TED passed the NMFS testing protocol
in 2001. The whelk TED design is
similar to the top-opening flounder TED
used along the southeastern Atlantic
coast during the winter months,
featuring enlarged openings at the
bottom of the frame. NMFS is currently
considering an option to require the use
of TEDs in the whelk trawl fishery.
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
7384
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Currently, GDNR requires the use of this
TED in the whelk trawl fishery in
Georgia State waters; however, some
whelk trawling does occur in Federal
waters.
The calico scallop fishery originally
developed in North Carolina in the early
1960s, but the focus of the fishery
shifted to areas off Florida during the
early 1970s. Calico scallop trawls are
typically small (e.g., headrope length
<40 feet) and are towed for short periods
of time (e.g., 15 minutes). The scallop
beds off Florida stretch from
Jacksonville to Ft. Pierce in 60 to 240
feet (18 to 73 m) of water. Due to large
fluctuations of calico scallop abundance
and patchy distribution, landings within
the fishery are extremely sporadic.
Approximately 25 vessels are thought to
currently be operating in the fishery.
Similar to the whelk fishery, the calico
scallop fishery requires a TED that
allows the target species to pass through
the TED frame and be retained as catch.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that a
hard TED, similar in design to the whelk
TED, could be installed in calico scallop
trawls. NMFS is currently considering
an option to require the use of TEDs in
the calico scallop trawl fishery. TED use
in this fishery would be a new
requirement.
TED use in this fishery would be a new
requirement.
erjones on PRODPC74 with PROPOSALS
Mid-Atlantic Scallop Trawl Fishery
Flynet Fishery
Flynets are high profile trawls fished
just off the bottom and range from 80 to
120 feet (24.4 to 36.6 m) in width, with
wing mesh sizes of 16 to 64 inches (41
to 163 cm). The flynet fishery is a multispecies fishery that operates along the
East Coast of the United States. One
component of the fishery operates
inside of 180 feet (55 m) from North
Carolina to New Jersey, and targets
Atlantic croaker, weakfish, and other
finfish species. Another component of
the flynet fishery operates outside of
180 feet (55 m) from the Hudson Canyon
off New York, south to Hatteras Canyon
off North Carolina. Target species for the
deeper-water component of the fishery
include bluefish, Atlantic mackerel,
squid, black sea bass, and scup. Sea
turtle takes have been documented in
this fishery.
TEDs for the flynet fishery have been
in development since 1999. Two semirigid TED designs for use within the
flynet fishery have been tested and
passed the NMFS testing protocol when
rigged with a top-opening escape panel.
NMFS is currently considering an
option to require the use of TEDs in the
flynet fishery. TED use in this fishery
would be a new requirement.
The U.S. Atlantic sea scallop fishery
is conducted in the Gulf of Maine, on
Georges Bank, and in the Mid-Atlantic
offshore region southward to North
Carolina. The commercial fishery for sea
scallops occurs year round, and is
primarily conducted using dredges and
otter trawls. Approximately 10 percent
of landings in the sea scallop fishery are
from vessels using trawl gear, primarily
in the Mid-Atlantic. Fishing by these
vessels often occurs during the summer
when other species (e.g., summer
flounder) are not available (NMFS
2003). Trawl fishermen participating in
the sea scallop fishery primarily use
either trawls designed specifically for
the sea scallop fishery or flounder
trawls. Sea turtle takes have been
observed in the sea scallop trawl
fishery.
In 2005 and 2006, NMFS tested the
feasibility of TED use in the sea scallop
trawl fishery. The sea scallop TED
tested is a whelk TED that has been
modified to prevent chafing of the gear.
This TED design passed the NMFS
testing criteria for sea turtle escapement.
Initial results suggest that TED use in
the sea scallop trawl fishery is feasible.
NMFS is currently considering an
option to require the use of TEDs in the
Mid-Atlantic sea scallop trawl fishery.
Movement of the Summer Flounder
Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area
Boundary
Any summer flounder trawler that
operates within the Summer Flounder
Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area must
utilize TEDs in its nets (50 CFR
223.206(d)(2)(iii)). Currently, this
protection area is bounded on the north
by a line extending off Cape Charles,
Virginia, on the south by a line
extending from the South CarolinaNorth Carolina boundary, and seaward
by the Exclusive Economic Zone
boundary. Vessels are exempted from
the TED requirement north of Oregon
Inlet, North Carolina, from January 15
through March 15, annually, when take
of sea turtles by summer flounder
trawling is not expected.
From 1994–2004, observers
documented takes in summer flounder
and other Mid-Atlantic bottom otter
trawl fisheries in areas and times when
TEDs are not required in the summer
flounder trawl fishery (Murray 2006).
Murray (2006) estimated sea turtle
bycatch in the Mid-Atlantic bottom otter
trawl fisheries. Murray found that,
based on the analysis, the likelihood of
interacting with a turtle depends on the
time and area in which fishing occurs
rather than the fish species being
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:53 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
targeted. While incidental captures of
sea turtles occurred throughout the year,
Murray (2006) demonstrated that most
interactions were confined to certain
bathymetric and thermal regimes.
Because of documented takes of sea
turtles north of the current line due to
the overlap in distribution of sea turtles
and trawl gear, NMFS is considering
moving the northern boundary of the
Summer Flounder Fishery-Sea Turtle
Protection Area farther north to reduce
sea turtle bycatch in the summer
flounder fishery. Additionally, NMFS is
considering expanding the TED
requirements to other trawl fisheries in
the Mid-Atlantic, which currently do
not have any TED requirements within
this geographic area.
Conclusion
NMFS is seeking advanced public
input on potential measures to reduce
sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic trawl
fisheries and in Gulf of Mexico trawl
fisheries where sea turtle conservation
measures do not currently apply. NMFS
is also seeking information on sea turtle
interactions in Atlantic and Gulf of
Mexico trawl fisheries. NMFS wants to
improve the performance of TEDs to
protect large turtles, reduce sea turtle
bycatch in additional trawl fisheries
with sea turtle interactions, and
streamline and simplify the regulations.
NMFS is also soliciting comment on
whether and how far north to move the
northern boundary of the Summer
Flounder Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection
Area, as well as on other viable ideas or
concepts to reduce sea turtle bycatch in
trawl fisheries. Measures may include
new TED designs for various trawl
fisheries, or other technologies and
approaches that may minimize or
mitigate sea turtle interactions in trawl
fisheries.
Literature Cited
Murray, K.T. 2006. Estimated Average
Annual Bycatch of Loggerhead Sea
Turtles (Caretta caretta) in U.S. MidAtlantic Bottom Otter Trawl Gear, 1996–
2004. U.S. Department of Commerce,
Northeast Fisheries Science Center
Reference Document 06–19; 26 pp.
This advance notice of proposed
rulemaking has been determined to be
not significant for E.O. 12866 purposes.
Dated: February 12, 2007.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–2719 Filed 2–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 31 (Thursday, February 15, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7382-7384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2719]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 223
[Docket No. 070122014-7014-01; I.D. 011907A]
RIN 0648-AV04
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; Sea Turtle Conservation
Requirements
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this advance notice of proposed rulemaking to
announce that it is considering amendments to the regulatory
requirements for turtle excluder devices (TEDs). Specific changes NMFS
is considering include increasing the size of the TED escape opening
currently required in the summer flounder fishery; requiring the use of
TEDs in the flynet, whelk, calico scallop, and Mid-Atlantic sea scallop
trawl fisheries; and moving the current northern boundary of the Summer
Flounder Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area off Cape Charles, Virginia,
to a point farther north. The objective of the proposed measures would
be to effectively protect all life stages and species of sea turtle in
Atlantic trawl fisheries where they are vulnerable to incidental
capture and mortality. NMFS is seeking public comment on these
potential amendments to the TED regulations. NMFS is also soliciting
public comment on the need for, and development and implementation of,
other methods to reduce bycatch of sea turtles in any commercial or
recreational fishery in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico where sea
turtle conservation measures do not currently exist.
DATES: Comments will be accepted through March 19, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action and requests for literature
cited should be addressed to Michael Barnette, Southeast Regional
Office, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701. Comments may also be sent via fax to 727-824-
5309, via email to 0648-AV04@noaa.gov, or to the Federal eRulemaking
portal: https://www.regulations.gov (follow instructions for submitting
comments).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Barnette (ph. 727-824-5312,
fax 727-824-5309, e-mail Michael.Barnette@noaa.gov), Ellen Keane (ph.
978-281-9300 x6526, fax 978-281-9394, e-mail Ellen.Keane@noaa.gov), or
Tanya Dobrzynski (ph. 301-713-2322, fax (301) 427-2522, e-mail
Tanya.Dobrzynski@noaa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
All sea turtles that occur in U.S. waters are listed as either
endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA). The Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii), leatherback
(Dermochelys coriacea), and hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) are
listed as endangered. Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia
mydas) turtles are listed as threatened, except for breeding
populations of green turtles in Florida and on the Pacific coast of
Mexico, which are listed as endangered. Incidental capture of sea
turtles in fisheries (bycatch) is a primary factor hampering the
recovery of sea turtles in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico.
To address this factor comprehensively, NMFS has initiated a
Strategy for Sea Turtle Conservation and Recovery in Relation to
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Fisheries (Strategy). The Strategy is
a gear-based approach to addressing sea turtle bycatch. Certain types
of fishing gear are more prone to the incidental capture of sea turtles
than others, depending on the design of the gear, the way the gear is
fished, and/or the time and area within which it is fished. An
evaluation of sea turtle interactions by gear type provides a more
comprehensive assessment of fishery impacts across fishing sectors as
well as across state, federal, and regional boundaries. Through this
strategy, NMFS seeks to address sea turtle bycatch across
jurisdictional boundaries and fisheries for gear types that have the
greatest impact on sea turtle populations.
Through the Strategy and based on documented sea turtle-fishery
interactions, NMFS has identified trawl gear as a priority for reducing
sea turtle bycatch. Trawling is a method of fishing that involves
actively towing a net through the water behind one or more boats.
Because trawl gear is towed, it has the capability to incidentally
capture sea turtles and other species that are not the intended target
of the fishery. The likelihood of incidental capture is inherent in the
basic design of trawls, regardless of the specific fishery. Trawl
fisheries with documented observer coverage or
[[Page 7383]]
historical bycatch information that occur in known areas and times of
sea turtle distribution have consistently been shown to capture sea
turtles. In fact, trawling is often used as a means to capture sea
turtles for research, distribution studies, and relocation because of
the effectiveness of this method. Without an avenue for escape, sea
turtles are likely to drown when captured in trawl gear due to forced
submergence. Even when drowning does not occur, the stresses of forced
submergence have been shown to result in various negative physiological
consequences that can make the turtles susceptible to later capture,
predation, boat strike or other sources of injury and mortality. NMFS
is now working to develop and implement bycatch reduction measures in
all trawl fisheries in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico when and where
sea turtle takes have occurred or where gear, time, location, fishing
method, and other similarities exist between a particular trawl fishery
and a trawl fishery where sea turtle takes have occurred. TEDs have
been proven an effective method to minimize adverse effects related to
sea turtle bycatch in the shrimp trawl fishery and, where applicable,
in the summer flounder trawl fishery. While TEDs have potential as a
bycatch reduction device for other trawl fisheries, differences in
trawl designs and fishing methods may necessitate modifications or
adjustments to the design of existing TEDs before they can be applied
in other trawl fisheries. Testing is necessary to ensure that feasible
TED designs for specific fisheries still accomplish the desired sea
turtle bycatch reduction goals and to determine the TED's impact on
target catch retention. It is possible that TEDs may not be feasible
for some trawl fisheries. In the event that TEDs are not a viable
option, other management measures such as tow time restrictions and
time/area closures may need to be considered. Given these issues, NMFS
anticipates a phased approach to implementation of any regulations to
address sea turtle bycatch in trawl fisheries as the information needed
to support measures in each individual trawl type becomes available.
The incidental take of sea turtles in certain trawl fisheries has
been documented in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic. Under the ESA and
its implementing regulations, taking sea turtles is prohibited, with
exceptions identified in 50 CFR 223.206. The incidental taking of
threatened sea turtles during shrimp or summer flounder trawling is
exempted from the taking prohibition of section 9 of the ESA if the
conservation measures specified in the sea turtle conservation
regulations (50 CFR 223.206(d)) are followed. The conservation
regulations require most shrimp trawlers and summer flounder trawlers
operating in the southeastern United States (Atlantic Area and Gulf
Area) to have a NMFS-approved TED installed in each net that is rigged
for fishing to provide for the escape of sea turtles. TEDs currently
approved by NMFS include single-grid hard TEDs and hooped hard TEDs
conforming to a generic description, two types of special hard TEDs
(the flounder TED and the weedless TED), and one type of soft TED (the
Parker soft TED).
TEDs have an escape opening, usually covered by a webbing flap,
that allows sea turtles to escape from trawl nets. To be approved for
use by NMFS, a TED design must be shown to be 97 percent effective in
excluding sea turtles during experimental TED testing. TEDs must meet
generic criteria based upon certain parameters of TED design,
configuration, and installation, including height and width dimensions
of the TED opening through which the turtles escape.
In order to allow the release of leatherback and large loggerhead
sea turtles, NMFS required the use of large escape openings in the
shrimp fishery in February 2003 (68 FR 8456; February 21, 2003). The
February 2003 regulations required the use of either the double cover
flap TED, a TED with a minimum opening of 71 inch (180 cm) straight-
line stretched mesh, or the Parker soft TED with a minimum 96-inch
(244-cm) opening in offshore waters (from the COLREGS demarcation line
seaward) and in all inshore waters off of Georgia and South Carolina;
and required a TED with a minimum opening of 44 inch (112 cm) straight-
line stretched mesh with a 20 inch (51 cm) vertical taut height in all
inshore waters (from the COLREGS Demarcation line landward) except for
the inshore waters of Georgia and South Carolina. At this time, the
large-opening TED is only required in the shrimp trawl fishery.
Summer Flounder Fishery
Since 1992, all vessels using bottom trawls to fish for summer
flounder in specific times and areas off Virginia and North Carolina
have been required to use NMFS-approved TEDs in their nets (57 FR
57358, December 4, 1992; 50 CFR 223.206(d)(2)(iii)). Currently, the
escape opening requirements for the flounder TED are <=35 inches (<=89
cm) in width and <=12 inches (<=30 cm) in height (50 CFR
223.207(b)(1)). Although the February 2003 final rule (68 FR 8456) to
require the larger opening in the shrimp trawl fishery did not require
vessels in the summer flounder trawl fishery to use the larger escape
opening sizes, the rule stated NMFS was evaluating the need for such
restrictions in this fishery. The smaller opening currently used in
this fishery is insufficient to allow the escapement of leatherback sea
turtles and larger loggerhead and green sea turtles. The larger opening
TEDs have passed the NMFS testing criteria for turtle escapement and
NMFS has conducted testing of the larger opening in the Mid-Atlantic
summer flounder trawl fishery since 2003.
NMFS is currently considering an option to modify TED regulations
in the summer flounder trawl fishery to require a larger escape
opening. The larger escape opening would have a 142-inch (361-cm)
circumference with a corresponding 71-inch (180-cm) straight line
stretched measurement. This option is expected to decrease escape times
for all turtles and allow for the release of leatherbacks and all large
loggerhead and green sea turtles. The larger opening would be
consistent with sea turtle conservation measures currently in place in
the shrimp trawl fishery.
Whelk and Calico Scallop Trawl Fisheries
The whelk trawl fishery originally developed off the South Carolina
coast during 1977 and the spring of 1978 as an alternative fishery
during closures in the shrimp season. Trawling for knobbed and
channeled whelk typically occurs from mid-February through mid-April.
Currently, less than 35 commercial fishermen actively participate in
the fishery with five or more trips each year, although as many as 100
permits have been issued by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources
(GDNR).
Due to documented sea turtle interactions within the fishery, NMFS
evaluated potential TED designs for the fishery in 2000-2001. The whelk
TED was developed in cooperation with GDNR and the University of
Georgia Marine Extension Service in an effort to provide nearshore
whelk fishermen with a TED that would allow the target species to pass
through the TED frame and be retained as catch. The whelk TED passed
the NMFS testing protocol in 2001. The whelk TED design is similar to
the top-opening flounder TED used along the southeastern Atlantic coast
during the winter months, featuring enlarged openings at the bottom of
the frame. NMFS is currently considering an option to require the use
of TEDs in the whelk trawl fishery.
[[Page 7384]]
Currently, GDNR requires the use of this TED in the whelk trawl fishery
in Georgia State waters; however, some whelk trawling does occur in
Federal waters.
The calico scallop fishery originally developed in North Carolina
in the early 1960s, but the focus of the fishery shifted to areas off
Florida during the early 1970s. Calico scallop trawls are typically
small (e.g., headrope length <40 feet) and are towed for short periods
of time (e.g., 15 minutes). The scallop beds off Florida stretch from
Jacksonville to Ft. Pierce in 60 to 240 feet (18 to 73 m) of water. Due
to large fluctuations of calico scallop abundance and patchy
distribution, landings within the fishery are extremely sporadic.
Approximately 25 vessels are thought to currently be operating in the
fishery. Similar to the whelk fishery, the calico scallop fishery
requires a TED that allows the target species to pass through the TED
frame and be retained as catch. Therefore, NMFS has determined that a
hard TED, similar in design to the whelk TED, could be installed in
calico scallop trawls. NMFS is currently considering an option to
require the use of TEDs in the calico scallop trawl fishery. TED use in
this fishery would be a new requirement.
Mid-Atlantic Scallop Trawl Fishery
The U.S. Atlantic sea scallop fishery is conducted in the Gulf of
Maine, on Georges Bank, and in the Mid-Atlantic offshore region
southward to North Carolina. The commercial fishery for sea scallops
occurs year round, and is primarily conducted using dredges and otter
trawls. Approximately 10 percent of landings in the sea scallop fishery
are from vessels using trawl gear, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic.
Fishing by these vessels often occurs during the summer when other
species (e.g., summer flounder) are not available (NMFS 2003). Trawl
fishermen participating in the sea scallop fishery primarily use either
trawls designed specifically for the sea scallop fishery or flounder
trawls. Sea turtle takes have been observed in the sea scallop trawl
fishery.
In 2005 and 2006, NMFS tested the feasibility of TED use in the sea
scallop trawl fishery. The sea scallop TED tested is a whelk TED that
has been modified to prevent chafing of the gear. This TED design
passed the NMFS testing criteria for sea turtle escapement. Initial
results suggest that TED use in the sea scallop trawl fishery is
feasible. NMFS is currently considering an option to require the use of
TEDs in the Mid-Atlantic sea scallop trawl fishery. TED use in this
fishery would be a new requirement.
Flynet Fishery
Flynets are high profile trawls fished just off the bottom and
range from 80 to 120 feet (24.4 to 36.6 m) in width, with wing mesh
sizes of 16 to 64 inches (41 to 163 cm). The flynet fishery is a multi-
species fishery that operates along the East Coast of the United
States. One component of the fishery operates inside of 180 feet (55 m)
from North Carolina to New Jersey, and targets Atlantic croaker,
weakfish, and other finfish species. Another component of the flynet
fishery operates outside of 180 feet (55 m) from the Hudson Canyon off
New York, south to Hatteras Canyon off North Carolina. Target species
for the deeper-water component of the fishery include bluefish,
Atlantic mackerel, squid, black sea bass, and scup. Sea turtle takes
have been documented in this fishery.
TEDs for the flynet fishery have been in development since 1999.
Two semi-rigid TED designs for use within the flynet fishery have been
tested and passed the NMFS testing protocol when rigged with a top-
opening escape panel. NMFS is currently considering an option to
require the use of TEDs in the flynet fishery. TED use in this fishery
would be a new requirement.
Movement of the Summer Flounder Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area
Boundary
Any summer flounder trawler that operates within the Summer
Flounder Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area must utilize TEDs in its
nets (50 CFR 223.206(d)(2)(iii)). Currently, this protection area is
bounded on the north by a line extending off Cape Charles, Virginia, on
the south by a line extending from the South Carolina-North Carolina
boundary, and seaward by the Exclusive Economic Zone boundary. Vessels
are exempted from the TED requirement north of Oregon Inlet, North
Carolina, from January 15 through March 15, annually, when take of sea
turtles by summer flounder trawling is not expected.
From 1994-2004, observers documented takes in summer flounder and
other Mid-Atlantic bottom otter trawl fisheries in areas and times when
TEDs are not required in the summer flounder trawl fishery (Murray
2006). Murray (2006) estimated sea turtle bycatch in the Mid-Atlantic
bottom otter trawl fisheries. Murray found that, based on the analysis,
the likelihood of interacting with a turtle depends on the time and
area in which fishing occurs rather than the fish species being
targeted. While incidental captures of sea turtles occurred throughout
the year, Murray (2006) demonstrated that most interactions were
confined to certain bathymetric and thermal regimes. Because of
documented takes of sea turtles north of the current line due to the
overlap in distribution of sea turtles and trawl gear, NMFS is
considering moving the northern boundary of the Summer Flounder
Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area farther north to reduce sea turtle
bycatch in the summer flounder fishery. Additionally, NMFS is
considering expanding the TED requirements to other trawl fisheries in
the Mid-Atlantic, which currently do not have any TED requirements
within this geographic area.
Conclusion
NMFS is seeking advanced public input on potential measures to
reduce sea turtle bycatch in Atlantic trawl fisheries and in Gulf of
Mexico trawl fisheries where sea turtle conservation measures do not
currently apply. NMFS is also seeking information on sea turtle
interactions in Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico trawl fisheries. NMFS wants
to improve the performance of TEDs to protect large turtles, reduce sea
turtle bycatch in additional trawl fisheries with sea turtle
interactions, and streamline and simplify the regulations. NMFS is also
soliciting comment on whether and how far north to move the northern
boundary of the Summer Flounder Fishery-Sea Turtle Protection Area, as
well as on other viable ideas or concepts to reduce sea turtle bycatch
in trawl fisheries. Measures may include new TED designs for various
trawl fisheries, or other technologies and approaches that may minimize
or mitigate sea turtle interactions in trawl fisheries.
Literature Cited
Murray, K.T. 2006. Estimated Average Annual Bycatch of Loggerhead
Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta) in U.S. Mid-Atlantic Bottom Otter Trawl
Gear, 1996-2004. U.S. Department of Commerce, Northeast Fisheries
Science Center Reference Document 06-19; 26 pp.
This advance notice of proposed rulemaking has been determined to
be not significant for E.O. 12866 purposes.
Dated: February 12, 2007.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-2719 Filed 2-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S