Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Airplanes, 6980-6981 [E7-2523]
Download as PDF
6980
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(l) European Aviation Safety Agency
airworthiness directive 2006–0075R2, dated
January 4, 2007, also addresses the subject of
this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
6, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–2513 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27223; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–224–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 767 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 767 airplanes.
This proposed AD would require
modifying the link arms of the number
2 windows in the flight compartment.
This proposed AD results from reports
of the number 2 windows opening
during takeoff roll, which has resulted
in aborted takeoffs. We are proposing
this AD to prevent the opening of the
number 2 windows during takeoff roll,
which could result in an aborted takeoff
or an unscheduled landing, and
adversely affect the flightcrew’s ability
to perform critical takeoff
communication.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Feb 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Bell, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety
and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 917–6422; fax (425)
917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2007–27223; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–224–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
Operators have reported the number 2
windows opening during takeoff roll.
This has resulted in aborted takeoffs,
which have occurred at speeds up to
140 knots. The number 2 windows are
opened and closed by rotating an
operating crank. When the flightcrew
closes the window, the crank roller at
the end of the torque tube will move
and lock into the cam block at the top
aft corner of the window. On affected
airplanes, the crank roller can move at
18-degree increments with one gear
tooth rotation. This minimum
adjustment of 18 degrees can cause too
much movement of the lower link arm
and result in interference with the link
bracket, preventing the crank roller from
engaging into the cam block. When this
occurs, the link arm will not be
positioned at an angle less than 90
degrees (over center) in reference to the
track roller, and the window could open
during takeoff roll. Opening of the
number 2 windows during takeoff roll,
if not corrected, could result in aborted
takeoffs or unscheduled landings, and
adversely affect the flightcrew’s ability
to perform critical takeoff
communication.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767–56A0010, dated
September 7, 2006. The service bulletin
describes procedures for modifying the
link arms of the number 2 windows in
the flight compartment. The
modification will allow the crank roller
to move at 9-degree increments with a
change of position of a retaining pin,
instead of one gear tooth rotation of 18degree increments. The link arm that
drives the window shut will be
positioned at an angle less than 90
degrees (over center), in reference to the
track roller, when the window is closed.
The modification will make sure that
the window cannot open without input
from the operating crank. The
modification involves either:
• Replacing the link brackets, cam
blocks, and torque tube assemblies with
new parts; or
• Reworking the cam blocks and
torque tube assemblies, and either
reworking the link brackets or replacing
them with new link brackets.
E:\FR\FM\14FEP1.SGM
14FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
6981
Costs of Compliance
There are about 896 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet;
of these, 384 are U.S.-registered
airplanes. The following table provides
the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD. The cost
of parts depends on the type and extent
of the replacement or rework.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Modification .......................................
8–10
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Feb 13, 2007
Average
labor rate
per hour
Work
hours
Action
Jkt 211001
Parts
$80
Cost per airplane
$495–$6,805
$1,135–$7,605
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Up to $2,920,320.
adversely affect the flightcrew’s ability to
perform critical takeoff communication.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
(f) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify the link arms of the
number 2 windows in the flight
compartment, in accordance with Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767–56A0010, dated
September 7, 2006.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
Fleet cost
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2007–27223;
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–224–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by April 2, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model 767–200,
–300, –300F, and –400ER series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–56A0010,
dated September 7, 2006.
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
5, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–2523 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of the
number 2 windows opening during takeoff
roll, which has resulted in aborted takeoffs.
We are issuing this AD to prevent the
opening of the number 2 windows during
takeoff roll, which could result in an aborted
takeoff or an unscheduled landing, and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14FEP1.SGM
14FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6980-6981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2523]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-27223; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-224-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 767 airplanes. This proposed AD would require
modifying the link arms of the number 2 windows in the flight
compartment. This proposed AD results from reports of the number 2
windows opening during takeoff roll, which has resulted in aborted
takeoffs. We are proposing this AD to prevent the opening of the number
2 windows during takeoff roll, which could result in an aborted takeoff
or an unscheduled landing, and adversely affect the flightcrew's
ability to perform critical takeoff communication.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bell, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6422; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2007-
27223; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-224-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
Operators have reported the number 2 windows opening during takeoff
roll. This has resulted in aborted takeoffs, which have occurred at
speeds up to 140 knots. The number 2 windows are opened and closed by
rotating an operating crank. When the flightcrew closes the window, the
crank roller at the end of the torque tube will move and lock into the
cam block at the top aft corner of the window. On affected airplanes,
the crank roller can move at 18-degree increments with one gear tooth
rotation. This minimum adjustment of 18 degrees can cause too much
movement of the lower link arm and result in interference with the link
bracket, preventing the crank roller from engaging into the cam block.
When this occurs, the link arm will not be positioned at an angle less
than 90 degrees (over center) in reference to the track roller, and the
window could open during takeoff roll. Opening of the number 2 windows
during takeoff roll, if not corrected, could result in aborted takeoffs
or unscheduled landings, and adversely affect the flightcrew's ability
to perform critical takeoff communication.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-56A0010, dated
September 7, 2006. The service bulletin describes procedures for
modifying the link arms of the number 2 windows in the flight
compartment. The modification will allow the crank roller to move at 9-
degree increments with a change of position of a retaining pin, instead
of one gear tooth rotation of 18-degree increments. The link arm that
drives the window shut will be positioned at an angle less than 90
degrees (over center), in reference to the track roller, when the
window is closed. The modification will make sure that the window
cannot open without input from the operating crank. The modification
involves either:
Replacing the link brackets, cam blocks, and torque tube
assemblies with new parts; or
Reworking the cam blocks and torque tube assemblies, and
either reworking the link brackets or replacing them with new link
brackets.
[[Page 6981]]
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 896 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet; of these, 384 are U.S.-registered airplanes. The
following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD. The cost of parts depends on the type and
extent of the replacement or rework.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Action Work labor rate Parts Cost per airplane Fleet cost
hours per hour
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification................... 8-10 $80 $495-$6,805 $1,135-$7,605 Up to $2,920,320.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-27223; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-
224-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by April 2,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-56A0010, dated September 7, 2006.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of the number 2 windows opening
during takeoff roll, which has resulted in aborted takeoffs. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the opening of the number 2 windows
during takeoff roll, which could result in an aborted takeoff or an
unscheduled landing, and adversely affect the flightcrew's ability
to perform critical takeoff communication.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification
(f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the link arms of the number 2 windows in the flight compartment, in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-56A0010, dated
September 7, 2006.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 5, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-2523 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P