Release of Lien or Discharge of Property; Correction, 6984 [E7-2496]

Download as PDF 6984 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et.seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. Related Information ´ (h) Refer to MCAI Direccion Nacional de Aeronavegabilidad AD No. RA 2006–06–01, Rev. 1 LAVIA S.A., Amendment No. 39/03– 041, dated November 17, 2006; and ´ Latinoamericana de Aviacion S.A. Service Bulletin No. 25/53/03, dated May 10, 2006, for related information. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 8, 2007. Kim Smith, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E7–2508 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. Correction of Publication Accordingly, the publication of proposed rulemaking (REG–159444–04), which was the subject of FR Doc. E7– 219, is corrected as follows: 1. On page 1302, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading ‘‘Background’’, sixth line from the bottom of the second paragraph of the column, the language ‘‘addition these provisions to the Code,’’ is corrected to read ‘‘addition of these provisions to the Code,’’. § 301.6325–1 [Corrected] 2. On page 1306, column 3, § 301.6325–1(a)(2)(i), fourth paragraph of the column, sixth line from the bottom of the paragraph, the language ‘‘been put into the matter. In no case’’ is corrected to read ‘‘been put in the matter. In no case’’. LaNita Van Dyke, Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). [FR Doc. E7–2496 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830–01–P Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [REG–159444–04] RIN 1545–BE35 United States Patent and Trademark Office Release of Lien or Discharge of Property; Correction 37 CFR Part 2 Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–159444–04) that was published in the Federal Register on Thursday, January 11, 2007 (72 FR 1301) relating to release of lien and discharge of property under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the Internal Revenue Code. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra A. Kohn, (202) 622–7985 (not tollfree number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the Internal Revenue Code. Need for Correction As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–159444–04) contains VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:31 Feb 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 [Docket No. PTO–T–2006–0011] RIN 0651–AC05 Changes in the Requirements for Filing Requests for Reconsideration of Final Office Actions in Trademark Cases United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Notice of proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (‘‘USPTO’’) proposes to amend 37 CFR 2.64 to require a request for reconsideration of an examining attorney’s final refusal or requirement to be filed through the Trademark Electronic Application System (‘‘TEAS’’) within three months of the mailing date of the final action. DATES: Comments must be received by April 16, 2007 to ensure consideration. ADDRESSES: The Office prefers that comments be submitted via electronic mail message to TM RECON COMMENTS@USPTO.GOV. Written comments may also be submitted by mail to Commissioner for Trademarks, PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313– 1451, attention Cynthia C. Lynch; or by hand delivery to the Trademark Assistance Center, Concourse Level, James Madison Building-East Wing, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, attention Cynthia C. Lynch; or by electronic mail message via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. See the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site (https:// www.regulations.gov) for additional instructions on providing comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. The comments will be available for public inspection on the Office’s Web site at https://www.uspto.gov. and will also be available at the Office of the Commissioner for Trademarks, Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia C. Lynch, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy, by telephone at (571) 272–8742. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The USPTO proposes the amendment of 37 CFR 2.64 to streamline and promote efficiency in the process once a final action has issued in an application for trademark registration. By setting a three-month period in which to file a request for reconsideration of the final action, and by requiring that the request be filed through TEAS, the proposed amendment would facilitate the likely disposition of an applicant’s request for reconsideration prior to the six-month deadline for filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (‘‘TTAB’’) or petition to the Director on the same final action. This may eliminate the need for some appeals or petitions, and reduces the need for remands and transfers of applications on appeal. A request for reconsideration of a final action does not extend the time for filing an appeal or petitioning the Director on that action. Under the current version of the rule, wherein the applicant may file a request for reconsideration at any time between the final action and the six-month deadline for appealing or petitioning, many applicants simultaneously seek reconsideration and file an appeal. Because the examining attorney loses jurisdiction over the application upon the filing of an appeal to the TTAB, this simultaneous pursuit of reconsideration and appeal often necessitates a remand by the TTAB to the examining attorney for a decision on the request for reconsideration. If the request is denied, then the case is transferred back to the TTAB. If the request is granted, and the examining attorney reconsiders the final E:\FR\FM\14FEP1.SGM 14FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2496]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 301

[REG-159444-04]
RIN 1545-BE35


Release of Lien or Discharge of Property; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (REG-159444-04) that was published in the Federal Register 
on Thursday, January 11, 2007 (72 FR 1301) relating to release of lien 
and discharge of property under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the 
Internal Revenue Code.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra A. Kohn, (202) 622-7985 (not 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under 
sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-159444-04) 
contains errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of 
clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of proposed rulemaking (REG-159444-
04), which was the subject of FR Doc. E7-219, is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 1302, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``Background'', sixth line from the bottom of the second 
paragraph of the column, the language ``addition these provisions to 
the Code,'' is corrected to read ``addition of these provisions to the 
Code,''.


Sec.  301.6325-1  [Corrected]

    2. On page 1306, column 3, Sec.  301.6325-1(a)(2)(i), fourth 
paragraph of the column, sixth line from the bottom of the paragraph, 
the language ``been put into the matter. In no case'' is corrected to 
read ``been put in the matter. In no case''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E7-2496 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.