Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Joint Comment Request, 7121-7128 [07-677]

Agencies

• FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
• FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
• Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
• DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
• Office of Thrift Supervision
• Comptroller of the Currency

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7121-7128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Joint Comment Request

AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury; 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); and Office of Thrift Supervision 
(OTS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of information collections to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the OCC, the Board, the FDIC, and 
the OTS (the ``agencies'') may not conduct or sponsor, and the 
respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection 
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) control number. On October 31, 2006, the agencies, under the 
auspices of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council 
(FFIEC), requested public comment for 60 days on a proposal to extend, 
with revision, the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call 
Report) for banks and the Thrift Financial Report (TFR) for savings 
associations, which are currently approved collections of information. 
After considering the comments, the FFIEC and the agencies have 
modified some of the proposed changes, which will be implemented March 
31, 2007, as proposed. Additionally, OTS will incorporate in its OMB 
submission the proposed TFR changes published in the Federal Register 
on December 1, 2006 (71 FR 69619). These changes will also be 
implemented March 31, 2007, as proposed.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 16, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
any or all of the agencies. All comments, which should refer to the OMB 
control number(s), will be shared among the agencies.
    OCC: Communications Division, Office of the Comptroller of the 
Currency, Public Information Room, Mailstop 1-5, Attention: 1557-0081, 
250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. In addition, comments may be 
sent by fax to (202) 874-4448, or by electronic mail to 
regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You can inspect and photocopy the comments 
at the OCC's Public Information Room, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20219. You can make an appointment to inspect the comments by calling 
(202) 874-5043.
    Board: You may submit comments, which should refer to 
``Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income, 7100-0036,'' by any of 
the following methods:
     Agency Web Site: https://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments on the https://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Include docket 
number in the subject line of the message.
     FAX: 202-452-3819 or 202-452-3102.
     Mail: Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20551.
    All public comments are available from the Board's Web site at 
https://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as 
submitted, unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your 
comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact 
information. Public comments may also be viewed electronically or in 
paper in Room MP-500 of the Board's Martin Building (20th and C 
Streets, NW) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.
    FDIC: You may submit comments, which should refer to ``Consolidated 
Reports of Condition and Income, 3064-0052,'' by any of the following 
methods:
     https://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/laws/federal/notices.html.
     E-mail: comments@FDIC.gov. Include ``Consolidated Reports 
of Condition and Income, 3064-0052'' in the subject line of the 
message.
     Mail: Steven F. Hanft (202-898-3907), Clearance Officer, 
Attn: Comments, Room MB-2088, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
     Hand Delivery: Comments may be hand delivered to the guard 
station at the rear of the 550 17th Street Building (located on F 
Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
    Public Inspection: All comments received will be posted without 
change to https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/notices.html 
including any personal information provided. Comments may be inspected 
at the FDIC Public Information Center, Room E-1002, 3501 Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA 22226, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on business days.
    OTS: You may submit comments, identified by ``1550-0023 (TFR: March 
2007 Revisions),'' by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail address: infocollection.comments@ots.treas.gov. 
Please include ``1550-0023 (TFR: March 2007 Revisions)'' in the subject 
line of the message and include your name and telephone number in the 
message.
     Fax: (202) 906-6518.
     Mail: Information Collection Comments, Chief Counsel's 
Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20552, Attention: ``1550-0023 (TFR: March 2007 Revisions).''
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard's Desk, East Lobby Entrance, 
1700 G Street, NW., from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on business days, Attention: 
Information

[[Page 7122]]

Collection Comments, Chief Counsel's Office, Attention: ``1550-0023 
(TFR: March 2007 Revisions).''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and OMB Control Number for this information collection. All comments 
received will be posted without change to the OTS Internet site at 
https://www.ots.treas.gov/pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1, including any 
personal information provided.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.ots.treas.gov/
pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1. In addition, you may inspect comments 
at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To make 
an appointment for access, call (202) 906-5922, send an e-mail to 
public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a facsimile transmission to (202) 
906-7755. (Prior notice identifying the materials you will be 
requesting will assist us in serving you.) We schedule appointments on 
business days between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. In most cases, appointments 
will be available the next business day following the date we receive a 
request.
    Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the 
OMB desk officer for the agencies by mail to the Office of Information 
and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to (202) 395-6974.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about the 
revisions discussed in this notice, please contact any of the agency 
clearance officers whose names appear below. In addition, copies of the 
Call Report forms can be obtained at the FFIEC's Web site (https://
www.ffiec.gov/ffiec_report_forms.htm). Copies of the TFR can be 
obtained from the OTS's Web site (https://www.ots.treas.gov/
main.cfm?catNumber=2&catParent=0).
    OCC: Mary Gottlieb, OCC Clearance Officer, or Camille Dickerson, 
(202) 874-5090, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office 
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20219.
    Board: Michelle E. Shore, Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer, 
(202) 452-3829, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 
20551. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may call 
(202) 263-4869.
    FDIC: Steven F. Hanft, Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 898-3907, 
Legal Division, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20429.
    OTS: Marilyn K. Burton, OTS Clearance Officer, at 
marilyn.burton@ots.treas.gov, (202) 906-6467, or facsimile number (202) 
906-6518, Litigation Division, Chief Counsel's Office, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agencies are requesting OMB approval to 
revise and extend for three years the Call Report and the TFR, which 
are currently approved collections of information.
    1. Report Title: Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call 
Report).
    Form Number: Call Report: FFIEC 031 (for banks with domestic and 
foreign offices) and FFIEC 041 (for banks with domestic offices only).
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.

OCC

    OMB Number: 1557-0081.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,900 national banks.
    Estimated Time per Response: 44.33 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 336,925 burden hours.

Board

    OMB Number: 7100-0036.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 905 state member banks.
    Estimated Time per Response: 51.02 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 184,692 burden hours.

FDIC

    OMB Number: 3064-0052.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,234 insured state nonmember 
banks.
    Estimated Time per Response: 35.27 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 738,413 burden hours.
    The estimated time per response for the Call Report is an average 
that varies by agency because of differences in the composition of the 
institutions under each agency's supervision (e.g., size distribution 
of institutions, types of activities in which they are engaged, and 
existence of foreign offices). The average reporting burden for the 
Call Report is estimated to range from 16 to 630 hours per quarter, 
depending on an individual institution's circumstances.
    2. Report Title: Thrift Financial Report (TFR).
    Form Number: OTS 1313 (for savings associations).
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.

OTS

    OMB Number: 1550-0023.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 845 savings associations.
    Estimated Time per Response: 57.1 burden hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 193,139 burden hours.

General Description of Reports

    These information collections are mandatory: 12 U.S.C. 161 (for 
national banks), 12 U.S.C. 324 (for state member banks), 12 U.S.C. 1817 
(for insured state nonmember commercial and savings banks), and 12 
U.S.C. 1464 (for savings associations). Except for selected data items, 
these information collections are not given confidential treatment.

Abstract

    Institutions submit Call Report and TFR data to the agencies each 
quarter for the agencies' use in monitoring the condition, performance, 
and risk profile of individual institutions and the industry as a 
whole. Call Report and TFR data provide the most current statistical 
data available for evaluating institutions' corporate applications, for 
identifying areas of focus for both on-site and off-site examinations, 
and for monetary and other public policy purposes. The agencies use 
Call Report and TFR data in evaluating interstate merger and 
acquisition applications to determine, as required by law, whether the 
resulting institution would control more than ten percent of the total 
amount of deposits of insured depository institutions in the United 
States. Call Report and TFR data are also used to calculate all 
institutions' deposit insurance and Financing Corporation assessments, 
national banks' semiannual assessment fees, and the OTS's assessments 
on savings associations.

Current Actions

I. Overview

    On October 31, 2006, the agencies requested comment on proposed 
revisions to the Call Report and the TFR (71 FR 63848). All four 
agencies proposed to replace certain information currently collected in 
the Call Report and TFR for deposit insurance assessment purposes with 
the information described in proposed amendments to Part 327 of the 
FDIC's regulations (71 FR 28790, May 18,

[[Page 7123]]

2006).\1\ The four agencies also proposed to revise the information 
collected in the Call Report and TFR on time deposits, particularly 
with respect to certain retirement accounts affected by the FDIC's 
amended deposit insurance regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On November 30, 2006, the FDIC published a final rule 
amending Part 327 of its regulations to improve and modernize its 
operational systems for deposit insurance assessments (71 FR 69270).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the OCC, the Board, and the FDIC (the banking 
agencies) proposed to implement a number of other changes to the Call 
Report requirements, most of which are expected to apply to a small 
percentage of banks. First, the banking agencies proposed to revise the 
Call Report to collect certain data on fair value measurements from 
those institutions that choose, under generally accepted accounting 
principles, to apply a fair value option to one or more financial 
instruments and one or more classes of servicing assets and liabilities 
and from certain institutions that report trading assets and 
liabilities. The banking agencies also proposed to collect an item for 
regulatory capital calculation purposes to capture the change in the 
fair value of liabilities accounted for under a fair value option that 
is attributable to a change in a bank's own creditworthiness. Second, 
in order to meet supervisory data needs, the banking agencies proposed 
to collect certain data in the Call Report on 1-4 family residential 
mortgages with terms that allow for negative amortization. Finally, the 
banking agencies proposed to clarify the Call Report instructions for 
assets serviced for others by explicitly stating that such servicing 
includes the servicing of loan participations.
    The OTS's other changes to the TFR were addressed separately in its 
notices published on July 31, 2006 (71 FR 43286), and December 1, 2006 
(71 FR 69619). These changes will be incorporated in this OMB 
submission, and will take effect on March 31, 2007.
    The revisions to the Call Report and the TFR set forth herein, 
which were approved for publication by the FFIEC, were proposed to take 
effect as of March 31, 2007, and, for certain deposit insurance 
assessment revisions, March 31, 2008. After considering the comments 
and other actions since the publication of the proposal, the agencies 
approved certain modifications to the initial set of proposed 
revisions. The agencies will move forward with these modified reporting 
changes on March 31, 2007, and March 31, 2008. For the March 31, 2007, 
report date only, institutions may provide reasonable estimates for any 
new or revised Call Report or TFR item for which the requested 
information is not readily available.
    The agencies collectively received comments from five respondents: 
one banking organization, one national banking trade association, a 
trade association of community organizations, a financial institution 
data processing servicer, and a government agency. All of these 
respondents except the government agency addressed the proposed 
reporting of information on 1-4 family residential mortgages with 
negative amortization features. The trade association of community 
organizations supported the collection of the total amount of these 
mortgages in the Call Report while the banking organization and the 
banking trade association addressed the proposal to collect certain 
additional data on these mortgages from banks with a significant volume 
of negatively amortizing residential mortgages. The data processing 
servicer commented on the proposed March 31, 2007, effective date for 
reporting this information.
    With respect to the other proposed revisions to the Call Report and 
the TFR, the banking organization stated that it ``generally supports 
the Agencies' ``proposed changes'' and the banking trade association 
expressed support for ``the majority of changes proposed by the 
agencies.'' This latter commenter observed that the proposed changes to 
the data reported for deposit insurance assessment purposes should be 
conformed to the FDIC's final rule on the operational procedures 
governing deposit insurance assessments that was published after the 
proposed changes to the Call Report and TFR were published for comment 
on October 31, 2006. This commenter also urged the agencies to proceed 
cautiously with the proposed reporting schedule that would capture data 
on banks' use of the fair value option under a yet-to-be issued final 
accounting standard.
    A summary of the agencies' responses to the comments and the final 
revisions are presented below.

II. Discussion of Revisions

A. Deposit Insurance Assessment Revisions to the Call Report and TFR

    On May 18, 2006, the FDIC issued proposed amendments to Part 327 of 
its regulations, ``Assessments,'' to improve and modernize its 
operational systems for deposit insurance assessments. Under these 
proposed amendments, the FDIC's computation of deposit insurance 
assessments for certain institutions would be determined using daily 
averages for deposits rather than quarter-end balances. On November 30, 
2006, the FDIC published a final rule amending Part 327 of its 
regulations largely as proposed on May 18.
    In conjunction with these amendments to Part 327 of the FDIC's 
regulations, the agencies proposed to revise and reduce the overall 
reporting requirements related to deposit insurance assessments in both 
the Call Report and the TFR in order to simplify regulatory reporting. 
The proposed revised reporting requirements contained the following key 
elements:
     Institutions would separately report (a) gross deposits as 
defined in Section 3(l) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) 
(12 U.S.C. 1813(l)) before any allowable exclusions and (b) allowable 
exclusions;
     The same data items would be reported for both quarter-end 
and daily average deposits;
     All institutions would report using quarter-end deposits 
and allowable exclusions; and
     All institutions with $300 million or more in assets, and 
other institutions that meet specified criteria, would also report 
daily averages for deposits and allowable exclusions in addition to 
quarter-end amounts.
    The proposal also provided an interim period covering the March 31, 
2007, through December 31, 2007, report dates, during which 
institutions would have the option to submit Call Reports and TFRs 
using either the current or revised formats for reporting data for 
measuring their assessment base. An institution that chose to begin 
reporting under the revised format in any quarter during the interim 
period would be required to continue to report under the revised format 
through the rest of the interim period and would not be permitted to 
revert back to the current reporting format. The revised reporting 
format would take effect for all institutions on March 31, 2008, at 
which time the current reporting format would be eliminated. Although 
no institution that chose to report under the revised format during the 
2007 interim period would be required to report daily averages during 
this period, any institution could elect to report daily averages as of 
any quarter-end report date in 2007. However, once an institution began 
to report daily averages (even during the interim period), it would be 
required to continue to report daily averages each quarter thereafter 
in its Call Report or TFR.
    In its May 18, 2006, proposed amendments to Part 327 of its 
regulations, the FDIC proposed to revise

[[Page 7124]]

the definition of the assessment base to be consistent with Section 
3(l) of the FDI Act. This was intended to eliminate the need for 
periodic updates to the FDIC's assessment regulations in response to 
outside factors and allow a simplification of the associated reporting 
requirements. In addition, the FDIC proposed to use daily average 
deposits and exclusions over the quarter instead of quarter-end totals 
for deposits and exclusions to compute the assessment base for 
institutions with $300 million or more in assets and other institutions 
who meet specified criteria. All other institutions could opt 
permanently to determine their assessment base using daily averages. In 
its final rule amending Part 327, the FDIC raised the size threshold 
for using daily average deposits and exclusions to compute an 
institution's assessment base from $300 million to $1 billion.
    At present, 23 items are required in the Call Report to determine a 
bank's assessment base and eight items are required in the TFR to 
determine a savings association's assessment base. The agencies 
proposed to change the way the assessment base is reported in the Call 
Report and the TFR. As proposed, these changes would effectively reduce 
the number of reported items to as few as two for certain small 
institutions (without foreign offices) and no more than six for other 
institutions. Specifically, the banking agencies proposed to replace 
items 1 through 12 (including their subitems) on Schedule RC-O, ``Other 
Data for Deposit Insurance and FICO Assessments,'' and OTS proposed to 
replace the eight items in the section of Schedule DI, ``Consolidated 
Deposit Information,'' for ``Deposit and Escrow Data for Deposit 
Insurance Premium Assessments'' with the following six items:
     Total Deposit Liabilities Before Exclusions (Gross) as 
Defined in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act and FDIC Regulations;
     Total Allowable Exclusions (including Foreign Deposits);
     Total Foreign Deposits (included in Total Allowable 
Exclusions);
     Total Daily Average of Deposit Liabilities Before 
Exclusions (Gross) as Defined in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act and FDIC 
Regulations;
     Total Daily Average Allowable Exclusions (including 
Foreign Deposits); and
     Total Daily Average Foreign Deposits (included in Total 
Daily Average Allowable Exclusions).
    The total amount of allowable exclusions from the assessment base 
would be reported separately for any institution that maintains such 
records as will readily permit verification of the correctness of its 
assessment base. The allowable exclusions, which are set forth in 
Section 3(l)(5) and other sections of the FDI Act and in the FDIC's 
regulations, include foreign deposits (including International Banking 
Facility deposits), reciprocal balances, drafts drawn on other 
depository institutions, pass-through reserve balances, depository 
institution investment contracts, and deposits accumulated for the 
payment of personal loans that are assigned or pledged to assure 
payment at maturity. The net amount of unposted debits and credits 
would no longer be considered within the definition of the assessment 
base.
    In addition to quarter-end balance reporting, institutions that 
meet certain criteria would be required to report average daily deposit 
liabilities and average daily allowable exclusions to determine their 
assessment base effective March 31, 2008. The amounts to be reported 
would be averages of the balances as of the close of business for each 
day for the calendar quarter. For days that an office of the reporting 
institution (or any of its subsidiaries or branches) is closed (e.g., 
Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays), the amounts outstanding from the 
previous business day would be used. An office is considered closed if 
there are no transactions posted to the general ledger as of that date.
    According to the agencies' October 31 reporting proposal, the 
requirement for an institution to report daily averages beginning March 
31, 2008, would have applied to any institution that had $300 million 
or more in total assets either in its Call Report or TFR for March 31, 
2007, regardless of its asset size in subsequent quarters. In addition, 
if an institution reported $300 million or more in total assets in two 
consecutive Call Reports or TFRs beginning with its June 30, 2007, 
report, daily average reporting would have begun on the later of March 
31, 2008, or the report date six months after the second consecutive 
quarter. Daily average reporting beginning March 31, 2008, would also 
have applied to any institution that became newly insured after March 
31, 2007. An institution reporting less than $300 million in total 
assets in its Call Report or TFR for March 31, 2007, would be permitted 
to continue to determine its assessment base using quarter-end balances 
until it met the two-consecutive-quarter asset size test for reporting 
daily averages unless it opted to determine its assessment base using 
daily averages. After an institution began to report daily averages for 
its total deposits and allowable exclusions, either voluntarily or 
because it was required to do so, the institution would not be 
permitted to switch back to reporting only quarter-end balances.
    In its comment letter, the banking trade association ``point[ed] 
out that the threshold for average daily balance reporting requirements 
in the final FDIC ruling is $1 billion, which differs from the $300 
million threshold proposed by the FDIC on May 18, 2006,'' and upon 
which the agencies' October 31 reporting proposal was based. The trade 
association added that the reporting threshold in the Call Report and 
the TFR ``must be revised to $1 billion to correspond with the final 
FDIC rule.'' The agencies concur and are revising the threshold for 
average daily balance reporting to $1 billion. In addition, 
institutions that become newly insured on or after April 1, 2008, would 
be required to report daily average balances beginning in the first 
quarterly Call Report or TFR that they file. An institution that 
becomes insured after March 31, 2007, but on or before March 31, 2008, 
would not be required to report daily average balances in its Call 
Report or TFR unless and until it exceeded the $1 billion asset size 
threshold.

B. Revision of Certain Time Deposit Information on the Call Report and 
TFR

    The Federal Reserve uses data from Call Report Schedule RC-E, 
Deposit Liabilities, and from TFR Schedule DI, Consolidated Deposit 
Information, to ensure accurate construction of the monetary aggregates 
for monetary policy purposes.\2\ In order to more accurately calculate 
the monetary aggregates, the banking agencies proposed to revise two 
Schedule RC-E items, Memorandum items 2.b, ``Total time deposits of 
less than $100,000,'' and 2.c, ``Total time deposits of $100,000 or 
more,'' and add a new Memorandum item 2.c.(1) to this schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In order to calculate the money stock measure M2, the 
Federal Reserve takes M1 (which consists of currency held by the 
public, traveler's checks, demand deposits, and other checkable 
deposits) and adds (1) savings deposits, (2) small-denomination time 
deposits (time deposits in amounts of less than $100,000) less 
Individual Retirement Account (IRA) and Keogh balances at depository 
institutions, and (3) balances in retail money market mutual funds, 
less IRA and Keogh balances at money market mutual funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Schedule RC-E, Memorandum item 2.b would be revised to include 
brokered time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or more that 
are participated out by the broker in shares of less than $100,000 as 
well as brokered certificates of deposit issued in

[[Page 7125]]

$1,000 amounts under a master certificate of deposit (when information 
on the number of $1,000 amounts held by each of the broker's customers 
is not readily available to the bank). Memorandum item 2.c would be 
revised to exclude such brokered time deposits. In addition, because 
the deposit insurance limit for certain retirement plan deposit 
accounts increased from $100,000 to $250,000 in 2006, a new Memorandum 
item 2.c.(1) would be added to Schedule RC-E to separately identify the 
portion of the total time deposits of $100,000 or more reported in 
Memorandum item 2.c that represents IRA and Keogh Plan accounts.
    For the same reasons, OTS proposed to add two new items to Schedule 
DI of the TFR. These data items would be (1) Time Deposits of $100,000 
or More (excluding brokered time deposits participated out by the 
broker in shares of less than $100,000 and brokered certificates of 
deposit issued in $1,000 amounts under a master certificate of deposit) 
and (2) IRA/Keogh Accounts included in Time Deposits of $100,000 or 
More.
    The agencies received no comments on the proposed time deposit 
reporting changes, which they will implement as proposed.

C. Reporting of Certain Fair Value Measurements and the Use of the Fair 
Value Option in the Call Report

    On September 15, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board 
(FASB) issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157), 
which is effective for banks and other entities for fiscal years 
beginning after November 15, 2007. Earlier adoption of FAS 157 is 
permitted as of the beginning of an earlier fiscal year, provided the 
bank has not yet issued a financial statement or filed a Call Report 
for any period of that fiscal year. Thus, a bank with a calendar year 
fiscal year may voluntarily adopt FAS 157 as of January 1, 2007. The 
fair value measurements standard provides guidance on how to measure 
fair value and would require banks and other entities to disclose the 
inputs used to measure fair value based on a three-level hierarchy for 
all assets and liabilities that are remeasured at fair value on a 
recurring basis.\3\
    The FASB plans to issue a final standard, The Fair Value Option for 
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, in the first quarter of 
2007. This standard would allow banks and other entities to report 
certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value with the changes 
in fair value included in earnings. The banking agencies anticipate 
that relatively few banks will elect to use the fair value option for a 
significant portion of their financial assets and liabilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The FASB's three-level fair value hierarchy gives the 
highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical 
assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to 
unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in 
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the 
reporting bank has the ability to access at the measurement date 
(e.g., the Call Report date). Level 2 inputs are inputs other than 
quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the 
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs 
are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the FASB's Web site (https://www.fasb.org), the FASB 
Board has tentatively decided to require that the effective date of the 
final fair value option standard be the same as the effective date of 
FAS 157. Thus, the final fair value option standard should be effective 
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after 
November 15, 2007. The FASB Board has also tentatively decided to 
permit an entity to early adopt the final fair value option standard 
provided that the entity also adopts all of the requirements 
(measurement and disclosure) of FAS 157 concurrent with or prior to the 
early adoption of the final fair value option standard. Furthermore, 
the FASB Board would permit early adoption of the final fair value 
option standard within 120 days of the beginning of the entity's fiscal 
year, thereby making the fair value option election retroactive to the 
beginning of that fiscal year (or the date of initial recognition, if 
later) provided that the entity has not yet issued any interim 
financial statements for that fiscal year. Thus, a bank with a calendar 
year fiscal year that voluntarily adopts FAS 157 as of January 1, 2007, 
would also be able to adopt the final fair value option standard as of 
that same date.
    The banking agencies proposed to clarify the Call Report 
instructions to explain where financial assets and liabilities measured 
under the fair value option should be reported in the existing line 
items of the Call Report. The banking agencies also proposed to add a 
new Schedule RC-Q to the Call Report to collect data, by major asset 
and liability category, on the amount of assets and liabilities to 
which the fair value option has been applied along with separate 
disclosure of the amount of such assets and liabilities whose fair 
values were estimated under level two and under level three of the 
FASB's fair value hierarchy. The categories are:
     Securities held for purposes other than trading with 
changes in fair value reported in current earnings;
     Loans and leases;
     All other financial assets and servicing assets;
     Deposit liabilities;
     All other financial liabilities and servicing liabilities; 
and
     Loan commitments (not accounted for as derivatives).
    In addition, the banking agencies proposed to collect data on 
trading assets and trading liabilities in the new schedule from those 
banks that complete Schedule RC-D, Trading Assets and Liabilities, 
i.e., banks that reported average trading assets of $2 million or more 
for any quarter of the preceding calendar year. In the proposed new 
schedule, such banks would report the carrying amount of trading assets 
and trading liabilities whose fair values were estimated under level 
two and under level three of the FASB's fair value hierarchy.
    The FASB's fair value measurements standard requires banks and 
other entities to consider the effect of a change in their own 
creditworthiness when determining the fair value of a financial 
liability. The banking agencies proposed to add one new item to 
Schedule RC-R, Regulatory Capital, for the cumulative change in the 
fair value of all financial liabilities accounted for under the fair 
value option that is attributable to changes in the bank's own 
creditworthiness. This amount would be excluded from the bank's 
retained earnings for purposes of determining Tier 1 capital under the 
banking agencies' regulatory capital standards.
    Finally, the banking agencies proposed to clarify the instructions 
to Schedule RI for the treatment of interest income on financial assets 
and interest expense on financial liabilities measured under a fair 
value option. The instructions would be modified to instruct banks to 
separate the contractual year-to-date amount of interest earned on 
financial assets and interest incurred on financial liabilities that 
are reported under a fair value option from the overall year-to-date 
fair value adjustment and report these contractual amounts in the 
appropriate interest income or interest expense items on Schedule RI.
    Only one commenter, the banking trade association, offered comments 
on fair value option reporting, urging ``the agencies to proceed 
cautiously with any major revisions to the Call Report or TFR prior to 
the official release of the Fair Value Option statement.'' The trade 
association also requested that the agencies delay the March 31, 2007, 
effective date of the proposed reporting revisions related to the fair 
value option if the release of the FASB's final fair

[[Page 7126]]

value option standard is delayed beyond its expected issuance in the 
first quarter of 2007. The trade association did not address the 
proposed reporting revisions for the fair value option and fair value 
measurements themselves.
    The banking agencies agree on the need for caution in implementing 
their proposed reporting revisions related to the fair value option and 
fair value measurements. Accordingly, once the FASB issues its final 
fair value option standard, only if banks are permitted to adopt this 
standard in the first quarter of 2007 for other financial reporting 
purposes would the fair value option reporting requirements in the Call 
Report take effect as of March 31, 2007. Otherwise, these reporting 
requirements would be delayed until banks can elect the fair value 
option for other financial reporting purposes. Additionally, the 
banking agencies will proceed with the new Schedule RC-R item for fair 
value changes included in retained earnings that are attributable to 
changes in a bank's own creditworthiness. This item will initially 
reflect the banking agencies' determination that banks should exclude 
from Tier 1 capital the cumulative change in the fair value of 
financial liabilities accounted for under a fair value option that is 
included in retained earnings and is attributable to changes in the 
bank's own creditworthiness. If the scope of the banking agencies' 
determination concerning changes in the fair value of liabilities 
attributable to changes in own creditworthiness is later modified, the 
new Schedule RC-R item would be modified accordingly.

D. Reporting of Certain Data in the Call Report on 1-4 Family 
Residential Mortgage Loans With Terms That Allow for Negative 
Amortization

    The banking agencies proposed to collect certain Call Report items 
to monitor the extent of bank holdings of closed-end 1-4 family 
residential mortgage loan products whose terms allow for negative 
amortization. As proposed, all banks would report the total amount of 
their holdings of such closed-end mortgage loans in a new memorandum 
item in Schedule RC-C, Part I, Loans and Leases. The banking agencies 
also proposed to collect two additional memorandum items on Schedule 
RC-C and another new memorandum item on Schedule RI, Income Statement, 
from banks with a significant volume of negatively amortizing 1-4 
family residential mortgage loans. The two additional Schedule RC-C 
memorandum items would be (1) the total maximum remaining amount of 
negative amortization contractually permitted on closed-end loans 
secured by 1-4 family residential properties and (2) the total amount 
of negative amortization on closed-end loans secured by 1-4 family 
residential properties that is included in the carrying amount of these 
loans. The Schedule RI memorandum item would be the year-to-date 
noncash income on closed-end loans with a negative amortization feature 
secured by 1-4 family residential properties.
    The banking agencies' proposal stated that the threshold for 
identifying banks with a significant volume of negatively amortizing 
residential mortgage loans would be based on the aggregate amount of 
these loans being in excess of either a certain dollar amount, e.g., 
$100 million or $250 million, or a certain percentage of the total 
loans and leases (in domestic offices) reported on Schedule RC-C, e.g., 
five percent or ten percent. For reporting during 2007, a bank with 
negatively amortizing loans would determine whether it met the size 
threshold for reporting the three additional memorandum items using 
data reflected in its December 31, 2006, Call Report. For reporting in 
2008 and subsequent years, the determination would be based on data 
from the previous year-end Call Report. Thus, banks with negatively 
amortizing 1-4 family residential mortgage loans in excess of the 
reporting threshold as of the end of any particular calendar year would 
report these three items for the entire next calendar year.
    The banking agencies requested comment on the specific dollar 
amount and percentage of loans that should be used in setting the size 
threshold for additional reporting on negatively amortizing loans. As 
mentioned above, the comments from the banking organization and the 
banking trade association addressed this threshold. In this regard, the 
banking organization recommended that the agencies base their reporting 
threshold only on a percentage of an institution's total loans and 
leases and not also include a fixed dollar amount of negatively 
amortizing loans in the threshold test. The organization stated that 
using a percentage test ``is more in line with the Agencies' goals of 
ensuring the safety and soundness of institutions while minimizing the 
burden of information collection'' because ``safety and soundness 
concerns become more prominent only as an institution's concentration 
in these loans increases relative to the rest of its portfolio.''
    In its comments, the banking trade association referred to the 
agencies' Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product 
Risks, which they published at the beginning of October 2006,\4\ noting 
that this guidance ``specifically states that the agencies did not 
intend to establish concentration caps for institutions that 
underwrite'' nontraditional mortgages, including the residential 
mortgages with negative amortization features on which data would be 
reported in the Call Report. The trade association expressed concern 
that the establishment of a reporting threshold for reporting certain 
data on these loans would be ``a de facto concentration limit above 
which heightened regulatory scrutiny could be implied for such loans.'' 
This ``would be inconsistent with the Interagency Guidance.'' As a 
consequence, the trade association suggested eliminating the entire 
proposed reporting requirement for negatively amortizing residential 
mortgage loans. Alternatively, if the proposed reporting requirement 
were to be retained, the trade association recommended eliminating the 
reporting threshold for the three additional items and requiring all 
banks to report these items.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 71 FR 58609, October 4, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The banking agencies have considered these comments that focus on 
the reporting threshold. The intent of the proposal to establish a 
reporting threshold for certain additional data on negatively 
amortizing residential mortgage loans was not to establish 
concentration limits for these mortgage products. Rather, as the 
agencies noted in their proposal, they currently ``have no readily 
available means of identifying the industry's exposure'' to these 
products, which led them to propose to collect certain data to assist 
them in ``monitor[ing] the extent of use of negatively amortizing 
residential mortgage loans in the industry.'' Thus, the reporting of 
data on these mortgages is intended to support agency analysis at both 
the institution level and the industry level. The threshold for 
reporting additional data on negatively amortizing residential mortgage 
loans that are present at an institution in a significant volume was 
designed to limit the reporting burden on institutions, particularly 
small banks, with a nominal volume of these loans. A threshold based 
solely on a percentage of total loans and leases would not enable the 
banking agencies to gain an industry perspective on the amount of 
remaining contractually permitted negative amortization, capitalized 
negative amortization, and noncash income from negative amortization 
and how they relate to the amount of negatively amortizing residential 
mortgages. Therefore, the banking agencies will

[[Page 7127]]

proceed with a reporting threshold for the three additional data items 
that incorporates both a dollar amount test and a percentage test. More 
specifically, banks would report the three additional data items 
pertaining to their negatively amortizing residential mortgages if the 
amount of these mortgages exceeds the lesser of $100 million or 5 
percent of their total loans and leases (in domestic offices), both 
held for sale and held for investment.
    The data processing servicer commented on the proposed March 31, 
2007, effective date for reporting this information. The servicer 
observed that the end of the proposal's comment period is less than 90 
days before this effective date, while it typically needs a minimum of 
180 days to implement programming changes after requirements are 
finalized. As a consequence, the servicer stated that it would not be 
able to commit to completing the programming, testing, and 
implementation of changes to its mortgage software by March 31, 2007, 
to enable its client banks to report the proposed information on 
negatively amortizing residential mortgages.
    The Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks 
indicates that management information and reporting systems ``should 
allow management to detect changes in the risk profile of its 
nontraditional mortgage loan portfolio. The structure and content 
should allow the isolation of key loan products, risk-layering loan 
features, and borrower characteristics.'' The guidance further provides 
that ``[a]t a minimum, information should be available by loan type,'' 
such as for the closed-end residential mortgage loans with negative 
amortization features that are the subject of this Call Report 
proposal, and ``by borrower performance (e.g., payment patterns, 
delinquencies, interest accruals, and negative amortization).'' These 
risk management expectations for information systems were set forth 
approximately 180 days before the March 31, 2007, effective date of the 
proposed Call Report items for negatively amortizing residential 
mortgages. In addition, as previously mentioned, for the March 31, 
2007, report date, banks may provide reasonable estimates for these new 
Call Report items if the requested information is not readily 
available.

E. Call Report Instructional Clarification for Servicing of Loan 
Participations

    Banks report the outstanding principal balance of loans and other 
assets serviced for others in Memorandum items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c of 
Schedule RC-S, ``Servicing, Securitization, and Asset Sale 
Activities.'' The instructions for these Memorandum items do not 
explicitly state whether a bank that has sold a participation in a loan 
or other financial asset, which it continues to service, should include 
the servicing in Memorandum item 2.a, 2.b, or 2.c, as appropriate. 
Because the absence of clear instructional guidance has resulted in 
questions from bankers and has produced diversity in practice among 
banks, the banking agencies propose to clarify the instructions to 
these Schedule RC-S Memorandum items to explicitly state that the 
amount of loan participations serviced for others should be included in 
these items. The banking agencies received no comments specifically 
addressing this instructional clarification, which will be implemented 
as proposed.

III. Other Matters

    Section 601 of the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 
(Relief Act) removed several statutory reporting requirements relating 
to insider lending by banks and savings associations. One of these 
amendments, which became effective on October 13, 2006, eliminated the 
requirement that an institution include a separate report with its Call 
Report or TFR each quarter on any extensions of credit the institution 
has made to its executive officers since the date of its last Call 
Report or TFR.\5\ Accordingly, institutions were no longer required to 
report on such extensions of credit beginning December 31, 2006, and 
the ``Special Report'' on loans to executive officers, which has been 
included with the Call Report and TFR in previous quarters, is being 
discontinued. Because the reporting burden of this ``Special Report'' 
has been included in the burden for the Call Report and TFR information 
collections, the agencies have adjusted the burden of these collections 
in response to this statutory change and the elimination of the 
reporting requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In keeping with the Relief Act, the Board amended Regulation 
O (12 CFR part 215) to eliminate the insider loan reporting 
requirements addressed in Section 601, effective December 11, 2006 
(71 FR 71472, December 11, 2006). The FDIC repealed Part 349 of its 
regulations (12 CFR part 349), which covered certain insider loan 
reporting requirements addressed in Section 601, effective December 
22, 2006 (71 FR 78337, December 29, 2006). The OCC's regulations (12 
CFR part 31) and the OTS's regulations (12 CFR part 563) incorporate 
Regulation O by reference and, therefore, do not require amendment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To improve the timeliness with which Call Report data become 
available to the public, the banking agencies will start posting 
individual bank data on the Internet earlier than in the past. This 
change will occur in conjunction with the implementation of the FFIEC's 
Central Data Repository Public Data Distribution (CDR PDD) site as the 
Web site for obtaining individual bank Call Report data. At present, 
individual bank Call Reports for which the analyses have been completed 
are released to the public beginning the third Friday after the report 
date (e.g., January 19, 2007, for the December 31, 2006, report) and 
additional bank reports are posted each Friday thereafter. Beginning 
with the March 31, 2007, report, the banking agencies plan to begin 
posting individual bank Call Report data on the CDR PDD Web site 15 
calendar days after the report date (e.g., April 15, 2007). However, no 
individual bank data will be posted until 72 hours after that data has 
been accepted by the banking agencies and is incorporated within the 
Central Data Repository.

IV. Request for Comment

    Public comment is requested on all aspects of this joint notice. 
Comments are invited on:
    (a) Whether the proposed revisions to the Call Report and TFR 
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of 
the agencies' functions, including whether the information has 
practical utility;
    (b) The accuracy of the agencies' estimates of the burden of the 
information collections as they are proposed to be revised, including 
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
    (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected;
    (d) Ways to minimize the burden of information collections on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
    (e) Estimates of capital or start up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
    Comments submitted in response to this joint notice will be shared 
among the agencies and will be summarized or included in the agencies' 
requests for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public 
record.


[[Page 7128]]


    Dated: February 8, 2007.
Stuart E. Feldstein,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, 
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 5, 
2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.

    Dated at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of February, 2007.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.

    Dated: January 31, 2007.
Deborah Dakin,
Senior Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations and Legislation Division, 
Office of Thrift Supervision.
[FR Doc. 07-677 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P; 6210-01-P; 6714-01-P; 6720-01-P