Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records, 6746-6747 [E7-2403]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
6746
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 13, 2007 / Notices
response to its notice of institution (71
FR 64292, November 1, 2006) of the
subject five-year reviews was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group responses were inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of the reviews will be placed in
the nonpublic record on May 15, 2007,
and made available to persons on the
Administrative Protective Order service
list for these reviews. A public version
will be issued thereafter, pursuant to
§ 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s
rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules,
interested parties that are parties to the
reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determinations
the Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
May 22, 2007, and may not contain new
factual information. Any person that is
neither a party to the five-year reviews
nor an interested party may submit a
brief written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the reviews by May 22,
2007. However, should the Department
of Commerce extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of §§ 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
§ 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as
amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by the American Honey Producers
Association and the Sioux Honey Association to be
individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:10 Feb 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the rules, each document filed
by a party to the reviews must be served
on all other parties to the reviews (as
identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determinations. The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the review period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s
rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 7, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–2455 Filed 2–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–919 and 920
(Review)]
Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From
Japan And Mexico
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission
determinations to conduct full five-year
reviews concerning the antidumping
duty orders on welded large diameter
line pipe from Japan and Mexico.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on welded large diameter line
pipe from Japan and Mexico would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule
for the reviews will be established and
announced at a later date. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
EFFECTIVE DATE:
February 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 5, 2007, the Commission
determined that it should proceed to
full reviews in the subject five-year
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act. The Commission found that
both the domestic and respondent
interested party group responses to its
notice of institution (71 FR 64294,
November 1, 2006) were adequate. A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s
rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 7, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–2456 Filed 2–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of
Records
Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Revisions of Notice of Privacy
Act Systems of Records.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a,
notice is given that the Foreign Claims
Settlement Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is modifying all of its
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 13, 2007 / Notices
Privacy Act Systems of Records, which
were identified in the revised Table of
Contents published in the Federal
Register on November 14, 2006, 71 FR
66,347 (November 14, 2006), and
corrected on December 4, 2006. 71 FR
70,426 (December 4, 2006).
On November 14, 2006, the
Commission published a proposal to
modify all of its systems of records to
include a new routine use that would
allow disclosure to appropriate persons
and entities for purposes of response
and remedial efforts in the event that
there had been a breach of the data
contained in the systems. 71 FR 66,347
(November 14, 2006). In accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11), the
public was given a 30-day period in
which to comment; and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), which
has oversight responsibility under the
Privacy Act, required a 40-day period in
which to conclude its review of the
systems.
As a result of comments received, the
Commission is making a minor
modification to the language of the
routine use in order to provide greater
clarity. A concern was raised that the
condition set forth in clause (1) of the
routine use (‘‘when (1) it is suspected or
confirmed that the security or
confidentiality of information in the
system of records has been
compromised’’) does not clearly identify
precisely who has to suspect or confirm
the compromise. While it was the intent
of the drafters that it be the Commission
that must suspect or confirm the
compromise, because that intent was
expressed only implicitly in the routine
use, the Commission is modifying the
language of the first condition to
provide additional clarity.
The text of the modification to the
Commission’s systems of records is set
forth below. In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(r), the Department has provided a
report to OMB and the Congress. The
new routine use will be effective
February 13, 2007.
Accordingly, pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Foreign
Claims Settlement Commission hereby
publishes notice that it is
supplementing the list of Routine Uses
of the Records Maintained in each of its
Privacy Act Systems of Records,
including the Categories of Users and
the Purposes of Such Uses, by including
the following additional Routine Use:
‘‘To appropriate agencies, entities, and
persons when (1) The Commission
suspects or has confirmed that the
security or confidentiality of
information in the system of records has
been compromised; (2) the Commission
has determined that as a result of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Feb 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
suspected or confirmed compromise
there is a risk of harm to economic or
property interests, identity theft or
fraud, or harm to the security or
integrity of this system or other systems
or programs (whether maintained by the
Commission or another agency or entity)
that rely upon the compromised
information; and (3) the disclosure
made to such agencies, entities, and
persons is reasonably necessary to assist
in connection with the Commission’s
efforts to respond to the suspected or
confirmed compromise and prevent,
minimize, or remedy such harm.’’
Mauricio J. Tamargok,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. E7–2403 Filed 2–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–BA–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application Nos. D–11324, Deutsche Bank
AG (DB); D–11383, L–11384 and D–11385]
Kern County Electrical Pension Trust
(the Pension Plan), Kern County
Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and
Training Trust (the Apprenticeship
Plan), Kern County Electrical Health
and Welfare Plan (the Welfare Plan),
The International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers Local Union 428
(the Local Union); L–11302 and L–
11303, OPET Health Care and Life
Insurance Plans RM3A and RM5A
(Together the H&L Plans); and OPET
Prescription Drug Plan RRx (Plan RRx;
All Three Together, the Plans), et al.;
Proposed Exemptions: Involving
Deutsche Bank, Kern County and
OPET Health Care
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code).
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments or requests for
a hearing on the pending exemptions,
unless otherwise stated in the Notice of
Proposed Exemption, within 45 days
from the date of publication of this
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6747
Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1)
The name, address, and telephone
number of the person making the
comment or request, and (2) the nature
of the person’s interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person
would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must
also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the
evidence to be presented at the hearing.
All written comments and
requests for a hearing (at least three
copies) should be sent to the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption
Determinations, Room N–5649, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Attention: Application No. lll ,
stated in each Notice of Proposed
Exemption. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or
hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or
FAX. Any such comments or requests
should be sent either by e-mail to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
ADDRESSES:
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
The
proposed exemptions were requested in
applications filed pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6746-6747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2403]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records
AGENCY: Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Revisions of Notice of Privacy Act Systems of Records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C. 552a, notice is given that the Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission (``Commission'') is modifying all of its
[[Page 6747]]
Privacy Act Systems of Records, which were identified in the revised
Table of Contents published in the Federal Register on November 14,
2006, 71 FR 66,347 (November 14, 2006), and corrected on December 4,
2006. 71 FR 70,426 (December 4, 2006).
On November 14, 2006, the Commission published a proposal to modify
all of its systems of records to include a new routine use that would
allow disclosure to appropriate persons and entities for purposes of
response and remedial efforts in the event that there had been a breach
of the data contained in the systems. 71 FR 66,347 (November 14, 2006).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11), the public was given a
30-day period in which to comment; and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), which has oversight responsibility under the Privacy Act,
required a 40-day period in which to conclude its review of the
systems.
As a result of comments received, the Commission is making a minor
modification to the language of the routine use in order to provide
greater clarity. A concern was raised that the condition set forth in
clause (1) of the routine use (``when (1) it is suspected or confirmed
that the security or confidentiality of information in the system of
records has been compromised'') does not clearly identify precisely who
has to suspect or confirm the compromise. While it was the intent of
the drafters that it be the Commission that must suspect or confirm the
compromise, because that intent was expressed only implicitly in the
routine use, the Commission is modifying the language of the first
condition to provide additional clarity.
The text of the modification to the Commission's systems of records
is set forth below. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), the Department
has provided a report to OMB and the Congress. The new routine use will
be effective February 13, 2007.
Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission hereby publishes notice that it is
supplementing the list of Routine Uses of the Records Maintained in
each of its Privacy Act Systems of Records, including the Categories of
Users and the Purposes of Such Uses, by including the following
additional Routine Use: ``To appropriate agencies, entities, and
persons when (1) The Commission suspects or has confirmed that the
security or confidentiality of information in the system of records has
been compromised; (2) the Commission has determined that as a result of
the suspected or confirmed compromise there is a risk of harm to
economic or property interests, identity theft or fraud, or harm to the
security or integrity of this system or other systems or programs
(whether maintained by the Commission or another agency or entity) that
rely upon the compromised information; and (3) the disclosure made to
such agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist
in connection with the Commission's efforts to respond to the suspected
or confirmed compromise and prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm.''
Mauricio J. Tamargok,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. E7-2403 Filed 2-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
