Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records, 6746-6747 [E7-2403]

Download as PDF 6746 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 13, 2007 / Notices response to its notice of institution (71 FR 64292, November 1, 2006) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group responses were inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. Staff report. A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on May 15, 2007, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions. As provided in § 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determinations the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before May 22, 2007, and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by May 22, 2007. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by the American Honey Producers Association and the Sioux Honey Association to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:10 Feb 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determinations. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 7, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–2455 Filed 2–12–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–919 and 920 (Review)] Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From Japan And Mexico United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determinations to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on welded large diameter line pipe from Japan and Mexico. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on welded large diameter line pipe from Japan and Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 5, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 5, 2007, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (71 FR 64294, November 1, 2006) were adequate. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 7, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–2456 Filed 2–12–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Foreign Claims Settlement Commission Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, Justice. ACTION: Revisions of Notice of Privacy Act Systems of Records. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, notice is given that the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is modifying all of its E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 13, 2007 / Notices Privacy Act Systems of Records, which were identified in the revised Table of Contents published in the Federal Register on November 14, 2006, 71 FR 66,347 (November 14, 2006), and corrected on December 4, 2006. 71 FR 70,426 (December 4, 2006). On November 14, 2006, the Commission published a proposal to modify all of its systems of records to include a new routine use that would allow disclosure to appropriate persons and entities for purposes of response and remedial efforts in the event that there had been a breach of the data contained in the systems. 71 FR 66,347 (November 14, 2006). In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11), the public was given a 30-day period in which to comment; and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which has oversight responsibility under the Privacy Act, required a 40-day period in which to conclude its review of the systems. As a result of comments received, the Commission is making a minor modification to the language of the routine use in order to provide greater clarity. A concern was raised that the condition set forth in clause (1) of the routine use (‘‘when (1) it is suspected or confirmed that the security or confidentiality of information in the system of records has been compromised’’) does not clearly identify precisely who has to suspect or confirm the compromise. While it was the intent of the drafters that it be the Commission that must suspect or confirm the compromise, because that intent was expressed only implicitly in the routine use, the Commission is modifying the language of the first condition to provide additional clarity. The text of the modification to the Commission’s systems of records is set forth below. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), the Department has provided a report to OMB and the Congress. The new routine use will be effective February 13, 2007. Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission hereby publishes notice that it is supplementing the list of Routine Uses of the Records Maintained in each of its Privacy Act Systems of Records, including the Categories of Users and the Purposes of Such Uses, by including the following additional Routine Use: ‘‘To appropriate agencies, entities, and persons when (1) The Commission suspects or has confirmed that the security or confidentiality of information in the system of records has been compromised; (2) the Commission has determined that as a result of the VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:55 Feb 12, 2007 Jkt 211001 suspected or confirmed compromise there is a risk of harm to economic or property interests, identity theft or fraud, or harm to the security or integrity of this system or other systems or programs (whether maintained by the Commission or another agency or entity) that rely upon the compromised information; and (3) the disclosure made to such agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist in connection with the Commission’s efforts to respond to the suspected or confirmed compromise and prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm.’’ Mauricio J. Tamargok, Chairman. [FR Doc. E7–2403 Filed 2–12–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–BA–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration [Application Nos. D–11324, Deutsche Bank AG (DB); D–11383, L–11384 and D–11385] Kern County Electrical Pension Trust (the Pension Plan), Kern County Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust (the Apprenticeship Plan), Kern County Electrical Health and Welfare Plan (the Welfare Plan), The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 428 (the Local Union); L–11302 and L– 11303, OPET Health Care and Life Insurance Plans RM3A and RM5A (Together the H&L Plans); and OPET Prescription Drug Plan RRx (Plan RRx; All Three Together, the Plans), et al.; Proposed Exemptions: Involving Deutsche Bank, Kern County and OPET Health Care Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). Written Comments and Hearing Requests All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or requests for a hearing on the pending exemptions, unless otherwise stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the date of publication of this PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6747 Federal Register Notice. Comments and requests for a hearing should state: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the person making the comment or request, and (2) the nature of the person’s interest in the exemption and the manner in which the person would be adversely affected by the exemption. A request for a hearing must also state the issues to be addressed and include a general description of the evidence to be presented at the hearing. All written comments and requests for a hearing (at least three copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N–5649, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Attention: Application No. lll , stated in each Notice of Proposed Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX. Any such comments or requests should be sent either by e-mail to: moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219–0204 by the end of the scheduled comment period. The applications for exemption and the comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. ADDRESSES: Notice to Interested Persons Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing (where appropriate). The proposed exemptions were requested in applications filed pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to the Secretary of Labor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6746-6747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, Justice.

ACTION: Revisions of Notice of Privacy Act Systems of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 
U.S.C. 552a, notice is given that the Foreign Claims Settlement 
Commission (``Commission'') is modifying all of its

[[Page 6747]]

Privacy Act Systems of Records, which were identified in the revised 
Table of Contents published in the Federal Register on November 14, 
2006, 71 FR 66,347 (November 14, 2006), and corrected on December 4, 
2006. 71 FR 70,426 (December 4, 2006).
    On November 14, 2006, the Commission published a proposal to modify 
all of its systems of records to include a new routine use that would 
allow disclosure to appropriate persons and entities for purposes of 
response and remedial efforts in the event that there had been a breach 
of the data contained in the systems. 71 FR 66,347 (November 14, 2006). 
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11), the public was given a 
30-day period in which to comment; and the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), which has oversight responsibility under the Privacy Act, 
required a 40-day period in which to conclude its review of the 
systems.
    As a result of comments received, the Commission is making a minor 
modification to the language of the routine use in order to provide 
greater clarity. A concern was raised that the condition set forth in 
clause (1) of the routine use (``when (1) it is suspected or confirmed 
that the security or confidentiality of information in the system of 
records has been compromised'') does not clearly identify precisely who 
has to suspect or confirm the compromise. While it was the intent of 
the drafters that it be the Commission that must suspect or confirm the 
compromise, because that intent was expressed only implicitly in the 
routine use, the Commission is modifying the language of the first 
condition to provide additional clarity.
    The text of the modification to the Commission's systems of records 
is set forth below. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), the Department 
has provided a report to OMB and the Congress. The new routine use will 
be effective February 13, 2007.
    Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, the 
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission hereby publishes notice that it is 
supplementing the list of Routine Uses of the Records Maintained in 
each of its Privacy Act Systems of Records, including the Categories of 
Users and the Purposes of Such Uses, by including the following 
additional Routine Use: ``To appropriate agencies, entities, and 
persons when (1) The Commission suspects or has confirmed that the 
security or confidentiality of information in the system of records has 
been compromised; (2) the Commission has determined that as a result of 
the suspected or confirmed compromise there is a risk of harm to 
economic or property interests, identity theft or fraud, or harm to the 
security or integrity of this system or other systems or programs 
(whether maintained by the Commission or another agency or entity) that 
rely upon the compromised information; and (3) the disclosure made to 
such agencies, entities, and persons is reasonably necessary to assist 
in connection with the Commission's efforts to respond to the suspected 
or confirmed compromise and prevent, minimize, or remedy such harm.''

Mauricio J. Tamargok,
Chairman.
 [FR Doc. E7-2403 Filed 2-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P