Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), 6290-6292 [E7-2143]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
6290
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Notices
whether the benefits of DNA collection
and testing is in fact an effective public
safety and crime control practice.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
needed for an average respondent to
respond is broken down as follows:
Law Enforcement—200 respondents,
average burden time 120 minutes—400
hours total.
Prosecutors—200 respondents,
average burden time 90 minutes—300
hours total.
Lab personnel—135 respondents
average burden 120 minutes—270 hours
total.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection:
The estimated total public burden
associated with this collection is 970
hours.
If additional information is required,
contact Lynn, Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
601 D Street, NW., Suite
1600,Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: February 5, 2007.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E7–2133 Filed 2–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB Number 1121–0309]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
30-Day notice of information
collection under review: International
Terrorism Victim Compensation
Program Application.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register Volume 71, Number 235, Pages
70990–70991, on December 7, 2006,
allowing for a 60-day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:06 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
comment until March 12, 2007. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally, comments may be
submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395–5806.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged.
Your comments should address one or
more of the following points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of methodology
and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and,
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Reinstatement, with change, of a
previously approved collection for
which approval has expired.
(2) Title of Form/Collection:
International Terrorism Victim Expense
Reimbursement Program (ITVERP)
Application.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: The Office of
Management and Budget Number for the
certification form is 121–0170. The
Office for Victims of Crime, Office of
Justice Programs, within the United
States Department of Justice is
sponsoring the collection.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: The form is
completed by U.S. nationals and U.S.
Government employees who become
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
victims of acts of international terrorism
that occur outside the United States.
Applicants seeking compensation from
OVC for expenses associated with their
victimization will be required to submit
said form. The form will be used to
collect necessary information on
expenses incurred by the applicant, as
well as other pertinent information, and
will be used by OVC to make an award
determination.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average to respond:
There will be an estimated 2,000
respondents, who will complete the
required certification in approximately
45 minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are approximately
1,500 hours annual burden associated
with this information collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice, 601
D Street NW, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, NW., Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: February 5, 2007.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E7–2134 Filed 2–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS)
Federal Bureau of Prisons,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice of Intent to Prepare a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for development of a Federal
correctional complex by the U.S.
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of
Prisons. The area under consideration
for correctional facility development
includes sites in the Aliceville area in
Alabama.
Background
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
is responsible for carrying out
judgments of the federal courts
whenever a period of confinement is
ordered. The mission of the BOP is to
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Notices
protect society by confining offenders in
the controlled environments of prisons
and community-based facilities that are
safe, humane, cost-efficient and
appropriately secure, and that provide
work and other self-improvement
opportunities to assist offenders in
becoming law-abiding citizens.
As of February 5, 2007 approximately
194,000 inmates are housed within the
114 federal correctional facilities that
have levels of security ranging from
minimum to maximum. At the present
time, the federal inmate population
exceeds the combined rated capacities
of the 114 federal correctional facilities.
An additional 18,746 federal inmates
are housed within privately-managed
secure facilities and approximately
11,109 inmates are housed in other
facilities for a total federal inmate
population of approximately 194,000.
The continuing inmate population is
due in part to Federal court sentencing
guidelines which are resulting in longer
terms of confinement for serious crimes.
The increase in the number of
immigration offenders and the effort to
combat organized crime and drug
trafficking are also contributing to the
increase. Measures being undertaken to
manage the growth of the federal inmate
population include construction of new
institutions, acquisition and adaption of
facilities originally intended for other
purposes, expansion and improvement
of existing correctional facilities, and
expanded use of contract beds. Adding
capacity through these various means
allows the BOP to work towards the
long-term goal of managing our inmate
population growth.
In the face of the continuing increase
in the federal prison population, one
way the BOP has extended its capacity
is through construction of new facilities.
As part of this effort, the BOP has a
facilities planning program featuring the
identification and evaluation of sites for
new facilities. The BOP routinely
identifies prospective sites that may be
appropriate for development of new
federal correctional facilities. Locations
of new federal correctional facilities are
determined by the need for such
facilities in various parts of the country
and the resources available to meet that
need.
The BOP routinely screens and
evaluates private and public properties
located throughout the nation for
possible use and development. Over the
past decade, the BOP has examined
prospective sites for new correctional
facilities development in Kentucky,
New Hampshire, Virginia,
Pennsylvania, West Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Indiana
among other locations around the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:06 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
6291
country and has undertaken
environmental impact studies in
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended.
employment/housing characteristics,
community services and facilities, land
uses, utility services, transportation
systems, meteorological conditions, air
quality, and noise.
Proposed Action
The BOP is facing increased bedspace
shortages throughout the federal prison
system. Over the past decade, a
significant influx of inmates has entered
the federal prison system with a large
portion of this influx originating from
the Southeast region.
In response, the BOP has committed
significant resources to identifying and
developing sites for new federal
correctional facilities throughout this
region, including construction of
facilities in Coleman, Florida; Yazoo
City, Mississippi; Marlboro County,
South Carolina; Williamsburg County,
South Carolina; and Pollock, Louisiana.
Even with the development of these
new and expanded facilities, projections
show the federal inmate population
continuing to increase, placing
additional demands for bedspace within
the Southeast Region.
In response, the BOP has undertaken
preliminary investigations in an effort to
identify prospective sites capable of
accommodating federal correctional
facilities and communities willing to
host such facilities. Through this
process, officials representing the
Aliceville, Alabama, area identified
potential locations for development of
federal correctional institutions and
offered several sites for BOP
consideration. These potential sites
were subjected to initial studies by the
BOP and those considered suitable for
correctional facility development will
be evaluated further by the BOP in a
DEIS that will analyze the potential
impacts of facility construction and
operation. The BOP is proposing to
build and operate in the Southeast
region a federal correctional complex
which could ultimately consist of four
institutions of varying security levels.
However, immediate plans look toward
construction of one of these institutions,
a medium-security federal correctional
institution with an adjoining satellite
work camp.
Alternatives
In developing the DEIS, the No Action
alternative, other actions considered
and eliminated, and alternatives sites
for the proposed medium-security
federal correctional institution will be
examined.
Three sites are currently identified as
alternatives for federal correctional
complex development. Site 1 is
comprised of approximately 735 acres
and is located approximately three
miles northwest of Aliceville along
Route 14. Site 2 is comprised of
approximately 827 acres and is located
approximately six miles south-southeast
of Aliceville along Route 2. Site 3 is
comprised of approximately 838 acres
and is located approximately three
miles south of Aliceville along Route 13.
Additional sites may also be examined
as sites become available through the
scoping process and preparation of the
Environmental Impact Statement.
The Process
In the process of evaluating the
potential environmental impacts
associated with federal correctional
facility development and operation,
many factors and features will be
analyzed including, but not limited to:
topography, geology, soils, hydrology,
biological resources, cultural resources,
hazardous materials, aesthetics, fiscal
considerations, population/
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scoping Process
During the preparation of the DEIS,
there will be opportunities for public
involvement in order to determine the
issues to be examined. A Public Scoping
Meeting will be held at 7 p.m., Tuesday,
March 6, 2007, at City Hall, Memorial
Parkway East, Aliceville, Alabama. The
meeting location, date, and time will be
well-publicized and have been arranged
to allow for the public as well as
interested agencies and organizations to
attend and formally express their views
on the scope and significant issues to be
studied as part of the DEIS process. The
Scoping Meeting is being held to
provide for timely public comments and
understanding of federal plans and
programs with possible environmental
consequences as required by the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended.
Availability of DEIS
Public notice will be given concerning
the availability of the DEIS for public
review and comment.
Contact
Questions concerning the proposed
action and the DEIS may be directed to:
Pamela J. Chandler, Chief, or Issac J.
Gaston, Site Selection Specialist, Site
Selection and Environmental Review
Branch, U.S. Department of Justice—
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
6292
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Notices
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534
Telephone: 202–514–6470 / Facsimile:
202–616–6024 / siteselection@bop.gov.
February 5, 2007.
Issac J. Gaston,
Site Selection and Environmental Review
Branch, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. E7–2143 Filed 2–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–5–P
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
February 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–2163 Filed 2–8–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–58,246]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Fibrex, LLC; Formerly Known as
Wellington Cordage, LLC; Currently
Known as the Lehigh Group; Madison,
GA; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974,
(26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on November 28, 2005,
applicable to workers of Fibrex, LLC,
formerly known as Wellington Cordage,
LLC, Madison, Georgia. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
December 21, 2005 (70 FR 75842).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of rope (i.e. cordage).
The subject firm originally named
Fibrex, LLC, formerly known as
Wellington Cordage, Madison, Georgia,
became known as The Lehigh Group in
January 2006 due to a change in
ownership. The State agency reports
that workers wages at the subject firm
are being reported under the
Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax
account for The Lehigh Group, Madison,
Georgia.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending the certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Fibrex, LLC, formerly known as
Wellington Cordage, LLC, Madison,
Georgia, who were adversely affected by
increased company imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–58,246 is hereby issued as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:06 Feb 08, 2007
All workers of Fibrex, LLC, formerly
known as Wellington Cordage, LLC, currently
known as The Lehigh Group, Madison,
Georgia, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
November 27, 2005, through November 28,
2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,059]
Hoover Precision Products, Inc.;
Washington, IN; Notice of Revised
Determination on Remand
On December 13, 2006, the United
States Court of International Trade
(USCIT) granted the Department of
Labor’s request for voluntary remand in
Former Employees of Hoover Precision
Products, Inc. v. United States (Court
No. 06–00381).
In the September 11, 2006 Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) petition, a company
official indicated that Hoover Precision
Products, Inc., Washington, Indiana
(subject facility) was a distribution and
warehouse center of carbon steel balls,
that the facility was scheduled to close
on September 15, 2006, and that three
workers would be separated as a result
of the closure. In support of the petition,
the company official cited NAFTA–4916
(certified on June 18, 2001; shift of
production to Mexico).
During the initial investigation, it was
revealed that the subject facility was
engaged in warehousing and
distributing articles produced at an
affiliated facility in Mexico, and that the
warehousing and distributing functions
were shifting to an affiliated facility in
Georgia.
Based on information obtained during
the initial investigation, the Department
determined that the subject workers
were ineligible to apply for TAA
because they did not produce an article
within the meaning of Section 222(a)(2)
of the Trade Act of 1974.
On September 15, 2006, the
Department issued a negative
determination regarding workers’
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
eligibility to apply for workers
adjustment assistance for the subject
workers. The Department’s Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on September 26, 2006
(71 FR 56172).
By application dated September 29,
2006, three workers requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination. In
the request for reconsideration, the
workers stated that ‘‘Washington, IN is
a distribution facility. We distributed
components to companies who
manufactured them into their finished
products. Hoover Precision in Indiana
has lost a substantial amount of
business from at least 3 companies who
are TAA certified. This qualifies our
company in Washington, IN as
secondary workers affected by foreign
trade.’’
For purposes of the Trade Act, a
secondarily-affected company is a
company that either supplies
components parts for articles produced
by a firm with a currently TAA-certified
worker group or is an assembler or
finisher for a firm with a currently TAAcertified worker group.
In order to be certified as eligible to
apply for TAA as workers of a
secondarily-affect company, the
following eligibility requirements must
be met:
(1) The workers’ firm or appropriate
subdivision produced an article during the
one year period prior to the petition date; and
(2) A required minimum of the workforce
has been laid off in the 12 months preceding
the date of the petition or is threatened with
layoffs (3 workers in groups of fewer than 50,
or 5% of the workforce in groups of 50 or
more); and
(3) Loss of business (during the relevant
period) as a supplier of component parts, a
final assembler, or a finisher for a firm that
is currently TAA-certified contributed
importantly to an actual decline in sales or
production, and to a layoff or threat of a
layoff.
By letter dated October 3, 2006, the
Department dismissed the workers’
request for reconsideration because the
subject facility did not produce an
article, the workers were service
workers who processed imported
articles, and the workers were not
eligible for TAA as workers of a
secondarily-affected company. The
Department’s Notice of Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration for the
subject facility was published in the
Federal Register on October 16, 2006
(71 FR 60766).
By letter dated October 9, 2006, the
workers appealed to the USCIT for
judicial review. The Plaintiffs alleged
that they were production workers and
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 27 (Friday, February 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6290-6292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2143]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS)
AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for development of a Federal correctional complex by
the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons. The area
under consideration for correctional facility development includes
sites in the Aliceville area in Alabama.
Background
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is responsible for carrying out
judgments of the federal courts whenever a period of confinement is
ordered. The mission of the BOP is to
[[Page 6291]]
protect society by confining offenders in the controlled environments
of prisons and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, cost-
efficient and appropriately secure, and that provide work and other
self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-
abiding citizens.
As of February 5, 2007 approximately 194,000 inmates are housed
within the 114 federal correctional facilities that have levels of
security ranging from minimum to maximum. At the present time, the
federal inmate population exceeds the combined rated capacities of the
114 federal correctional facilities. An additional 18,746 federal
inmates are housed within privately-managed secure facilities and
approximately 11,109 inmates are housed in other facilities for a total
federal inmate population of approximately 194,000.
The continuing inmate population is due in part to Federal court
sentencing guidelines which are resulting in longer terms of
confinement for serious crimes. The increase in the number of
immigration offenders and the effort to combat organized crime and drug
trafficking are also contributing to the increase. Measures being
undertaken to manage the growth of the federal inmate population
include construction of new institutions, acquisition and adaption of
facilities originally intended for other purposes, expansion and
improvement of existing correctional facilities, and expanded use of
contract beds. Adding capacity through these various means allows the
BOP to work towards the long-term goal of managing our inmate
population growth.
In the face of the continuing increase in the federal prison
population, one way the BOP has extended its capacity is through
construction of new facilities. As part of this effort, the BOP has a
facilities planning program featuring the identification and evaluation
of sites for new facilities. The BOP routinely identifies prospective
sites that may be appropriate for development of new federal
correctional facilities. Locations of new federal correctional
facilities are determined by the need for such facilities in various
parts of the country and the resources available to meet that need.
The BOP routinely screens and evaluates private and public
properties located throughout the nation for possible use and
development. Over the past decade, the BOP has examined prospective
sites for new correctional facilities development in Kentucky, New
Hampshire, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Indiana among other locations around the country and has
undertaken environmental impact studies in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended.
Proposed Action
The BOP is facing increased bedspace shortages throughout the
federal prison system. Over the past decade, a significant influx of
inmates has entered the federal prison system with a large portion of
this influx originating from the Southeast region.
In response, the BOP has committed significant resources to
identifying and developing sites for new federal correctional
facilities throughout this region, including construction of facilities
in Coleman, Florida; Yazoo City, Mississippi; Marlboro County, South
Carolina; Williamsburg County, South Carolina; and Pollock, Louisiana.
Even with the development of these new and expanded facilities,
projections show the federal inmate population continuing to increase,
placing additional demands for bedspace within the Southeast Region.
In response, the BOP has undertaken preliminary investigations in
an effort to identify prospective sites capable of accommodating
federal correctional facilities and communities willing to host such
facilities. Through this process, officials representing the
Aliceville, Alabama, area identified potential locations for
development of federal correctional institutions and offered several
sites for BOP consideration. These potential sites were subjected to
initial studies by the BOP and those considered suitable for
correctional facility development will be evaluated further by the BOP
in a DEIS that will analyze the potential impacts of facility
construction and operation. The BOP is proposing to build and operate
in the Southeast region a federal correctional complex which could
ultimately consist of four institutions of varying security levels.
However, immediate plans look toward construction of one of these
institutions, a medium-security federal correctional institution with
an adjoining satellite work camp.
The Process
In the process of evaluating the potential environmental impacts
associated with federal correctional facility development and
operation, many factors and features will be analyzed including, but
not limited to: topography, geology, soils, hydrology, biological
resources, cultural resources, hazardous materials, aesthetics, fiscal
considerations, population/ employment/housing characteristics,
community services and facilities, land uses, utility services,
transportation systems, meteorological conditions, air quality, and
noise.
Alternatives
In developing the DEIS, the No Action alternative, other actions
considered and eliminated, and alternatives sites for the proposed
medium-security federal correctional institution will be examined.
Three sites are currently identified as alternatives for federal
correctional complex development. Site 1 is comprised of approximately
735 acres and is located approximately three miles northwest of
Aliceville along Route 14. Site 2 is comprised of approximately 827
acres and is located approximately six miles south-southeast of
Aliceville along Route 2. Site 3 is comprised of approximately 838
acres and is located approximately three miles south of Aliceville
along Route 13. Additional sites may also be examined as sites become
available through the scoping process and preparation of the
Environmental Impact Statement.
Scoping Process
During the preparation of the DEIS, there will be opportunities for
public involvement in order to determine the issues to be examined. A
Public Scoping Meeting will be held at 7 p.m., Tuesday, March 6, 2007,
at City Hall, Memorial Parkway East, Aliceville, Alabama. The meeting
location, date, and time will be well-publicized and have been arranged
to allow for the public as well as interested agencies and
organizations to attend and formally express their views on the scope
and significant issues to be studied as part of the DEIS process. The
Scoping Meeting is being held to provide for timely public comments and
understanding of federal plans and programs with possible environmental
consequences as required by the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
as amended.
Availability of DEIS
Public notice will be given concerning the availability of the DEIS
for public review and comment.
Contact
Questions concerning the proposed action and the DEIS may be
directed to: Pamela J. Chandler, Chief, or Issac J. Gaston, Site
Selection Specialist, Site Selection and Environmental Review Branch,
U.S. Department of Justice--Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First
[[Page 6292]]
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534 Telephone: 202-514-6470 / Facsimile:
202-616-6024 / siteselection@bop.gov.
February 5, 2007.
Issac J. Gaston,
Site Selection and Environmental Review Branch, Federal Bureau of
Prisons.
[FR Doc. E7-2143 Filed 2-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-5-P
