Milk in the Northeast and Other Marketing Areas; Notice of Hearing on Proposed Amendments to Tentative Marketing Agreements and Orders, 6179-6184 [07-570]
Download as PDF
6179
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 27
Friday, February 9, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006,
1007, 1030, 1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and
1131
[Docket No. AO–14–A77, et al.; DA–07–02]
Milk in the Northeast and Other
Marketing Areas; Notice of Hearing on
Proposed Amendments to Tentative
Marketing Agreements and Orders
7 CFR
Part
1001
1005
1006
1007
1030
1032
1033
1124
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
1126 ....
1131 ....
Marketing area
Northeast ..........
Appalachian .....
Florida ..............
Southeast .........
Upper Midwest
Central ..............
Mideast .............
Pacific Northwest.
Southwest ........
Arizona .............
AO numbers
AO–14–A77.
AO–388–A21.
AO–356–A42.
AO–366–A50.
AO–361–A43.
AO–313–A52.
AO–166–A76.
AO–368–A38.
AO–231–A71.
AO–271–A43.
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; Notice of public
hearing on proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
A national public hearing is
being held to consider and take
evidence on proposals seeking to amend
the Class III and Class IV product price
formulas applicable to all Federal milk
marketing orders.
DATES: The hearing will convene at 9
a.m., Monday, February 26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at
the Holiday Inn Select—Strongsville,
15471 Royalton Road, Strongsville, Ohio
44136, phone (440) 238–8800.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack
Rower, Marketing Specialist, Order
Formulation and Enforcement, USDA/
AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop 0231—Room
2971, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 720–
2357, e-mail address:
jack.rower@usda.gov.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
Persons requiring a sign language
interpreter or other special
accommodations should contact Paul
Huber, Assistant Market Administrator,
at (330) 225–4758; e-mail:
phuber@fmmaclev.com before the
hearing begins.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
administrative action is governed by the
provisions of Sections 556 and 557 of
Title 5 of the United States Code and,
therefore, is excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Notice is hereby given of a public
hearing to be held at the Holiday Inn
Select, Strongsville, Ohio, beginning at
9 a.m. on Monday, February 26, 2007,
with respect to proposed amendments
to the tentative marketing agreements
and to the orders regulating the
handling of milk in the Northeast and
other marketing areas.
The hearing is called pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), and the applicable
rules of practice and procedure
governing the formulation of marketing
agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR
Part 900).
The purpose of the hearing is to
receive evidence with respect to the
economic and marketing conditions
which relate to the proposed
amendments, hereinafter set forth, and
any appropriate modifications thereof,
to the tentative marketing agreements
and to the orders.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Actions under the Federal milk order
program are subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This Act seeks to ensure that, within the
statutory authority of a program, the
regulatory and information collection
requirements are tailored to the size and
nature of small businesses. For the
purpose of the Act, a dairy farm is a
‘‘small business’’ if it has an annual
gross revenue of less than $750,000, and
a dairy products manufacturer is a
‘‘small business’’ if it has fewer than 500
employees (13 CFR 121.201). Most
parties subject to a milk order are
considered as a small business.
For the purposes of determining
which dairy farms are ‘‘small
businesses,’’ the $750,000 per year
criterion was used to establish a
production guideline of 500,000 pounds
per month. Although this guideline does
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
not factor in additional monies that may
be received by dairy producers, it
should be an inclusive standard for
most ‘‘small’’ dairy farmers. For
purposes of determining a handler’s
size, if the plant is part of a larger
company operating multiple plants that
collectively exceed the 500-employee
limit, the plant will be considered a
large business even if the local plant has
fewer than 500 employees.
USDA has identified that during 2005
approximately 51,060 of the 54,652
dairy producers whose milk is pooled
on Federal orders are small businesses.
Small businesses represent about 93
percent of the dairy farmers who
participate in the Federal milk order
program.
On the processing side, during June
2005 there were approximately 350 fully
regulated plants (of which 149 or 43
percent were small businesses) and 110
partially regulated plants (of which 50
or 45 percent were small businesses.) In
addition, there were 48 producerhandlers, of which 29 were considered
small businesses for the purposes of this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
who submitted reports under the
Federal milk order program during this
period.
The fluid use of milk represented
about 45.0 percent of total Federal milk
marketing order producer deliveries
during January 2006. Almost 237
million Americans, approximately 80
percent of the total U.S. population
reside within the geographical
boundaries of the 10 Federal milk
marketing areas.
In order to accomplish the goal of
imposing no additional regulatory
burdens on the industry, a review of the
current reporting requirements was
completed pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). In light of that review, it was
determined that these proposed
amendments would have little or no
impact on reporting, record keeping, or
other compliance requirements because
these requirements would remain
identical to those currently in effect
under the Federal order program. No
new or additional reporting would be
necessary.
This notice does not require
additional information collection that
requires clearance by the OMB beyond
the currently approved information
collection. Information currently
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6180
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
collected through the use of OMBapproved forms and the primary sources
of data used to complete the forms are
routinely used in business transactions.
The forms require only a minimal
amount of information that can be
provided without data processing
equipment or trained statistical staff.
Thus, the information collection burden
is relatively small. Requiring the same
reports from all handlers does not
disadvantage any handler that is smaller
than the industry average.
No other burdens are expected to fall
upon the dairy industry as a result of
overlapping Federal rules. This
proposed rulemaking does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
existing Federal rules.
To ensure that small businesses are
not unduly or disproportionately
burdened based on these proposed
amendments consideration was given to
mitigating any negative impacts. It is
expected that small producers would
not experience any particular
disadvantage compared to larger
producers as a result of the proposed
amendments. Similarly, it is expected
that small handlers would not
experience any particular disadvantage
compared to larger handlers as a result
of the proposed amendments. Possible
changes to the Class III and Class IV
price formulas should not have any
special impacts on small handler
entities. All handlers manufacturing
dairy products from milk classified as
Class III or Class IV would remain
subject to the same minimum prices
regardless of the size of their operations.
Minimum prices should not raise
barriers regarding the ability of small
handlers to compete in the marketplace.
Interested parties are invited to
present evidence on the probable
regulatory and information collection
impact of the hearing proposals on
small businesses. Also, such parties may
suggest modifications of the proposal for
tailoring its applicability to small
businesses.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Preliminary Economic Analysis and
Detailed Analysis Information
A preliminary economic analysis as
well as additional detailed analysis,
data and information used in
developing the preliminary economic
analysis are presented at the AMS Dairy
Programs Web site, https://
www.ams.usda.gov/dairy.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
The amendments to the rules
proposed herein have been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. They are not intended to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
have a retroactive effect. If adopted, the
proposed amendments would not
preempt any state or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act provides that
administrative proceedings must be
exhausted before parties may file suit in
court. Under Section 8c(15)(A) of the
Act (7 U.S.C. 608c (15)(A)), any handler
subject to an order may request
modification or exemption from such
order by filing with the Department of
Agriculture (Department) a petition
stating that the order, any provision of
the order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the order is not in
accordance with the law. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After a hearing, the
Department would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court
of the United States in any district in
which the handler is an inhabitant, or
has its principal place of business, has
jurisdiction in equity to review the
Department’s ruling on the petition,
provided a bill in equity is filed not
later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of the ruling.
Interested parties who wish to
introduce exhibits should provide the
Presiding Officer at the hearing with (6)
copies of such exhibits for the Official
Record. Also, it would be helpful if
additional copies are available for the
use of other participants at the hearing.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR parts 1000,
1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1030, 1032,
1033, 1124, 1126, and 1131
Milk marketing orders.
The authority citation for 7 CFR Parts
1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1030,
1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and 1131 read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674, and 7253.
The proposed amendments, as set
forth below, have not received the
approval of the Department.
Proposed by Agri-Mark Dairy
Cooperative
Proposal 1
This proposal seeks to amend the
manufacturing allowances for Class III
and Class IV product formulas, as
enumerated in § 1000.50 that may
include the most current plant cost
survey information available.
Specifically, this proposal seeks to
amend § 1000.50 milk price formulas by
revising the existing manufacturing
allowances for butter, nonfat dry milk,
cheese, and whey powder based upon
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
evidence obtained from the hearing
record. Amendments to these
manufacturing allowances would
directly affect the milk component
values used in Federal order milk price
formulas for all classes of milk.
Proposal 2
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product formulas
to annually update the manufacturing
allowances using an annual
manufacturing cost survey of cheese,
whey powder, butter and nonfat dry
milk plants (located outside of
California.) The proposed amendments
would grant authority to the Market
Administrator to administer the survey,
select the sample plants, and collect,
audit and assemble cost information.
The proposal seeks to use the annual
manufacturing cost survey data to
annually update manufacturing
allowances at a level that is the higher
of the following:
(1) Manufacturing costs would be set
at a level that would allow minimum
percentages of milk volume used and
plants in the entire Class III and Class
IV manufacturing plant population
outside of California to cover their costs;
or
(2) Manufacturing allowances would
be set at a level that would allow
minimum percentages of the milk used
by Class III and Class IV manufacturing
plants and the number of plants in any
specific Federal order pooling at least 2
billion pounds of milk annually to cover
their costs.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New
Mexico
Proposal No. 3
This proposal seeks to amend the
manufacturing allowances contained in
the Class III and Class IV product price
formulas. Specifically, this proposal
seeks to change the butter make
allowance butter from 11.5 cents to
11.08 cents, change the nonfat dry milk
make allowance from 14 cents to 14.10
cents, change the cheese make
allowance from 16.5 cents to 16.38
cents, and change the dry whey make
allowance from 15.9 cents to 14.98
cents.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (l);
(b) revising paragraph (m);
(c) revising paragraph (n)(2) and
(n)(3)(i);
(d) revising paragraph (o); and
(e) revising paragraph (q)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
*
*
09FEP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price
per pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be the U.S.
average NASS AA butter survey price
reported by the Department for the
month less 11.08 cents, with the result
multiplied by 1.20.
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat
solids price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the
U.S. average NASS nonfat dry milk
survey price reported by the Department
for the month less 14.10 cents and
multiplying the result by 0.99.
(n) * * *
(2) Subtract 16.38 cents from the price
computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(1)
of this section and multiply the result
by 1.383;
(3) * * *
(i) Subtract 16.38 cents from the price
computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(1)
of this section and multiply the result
by 1.572; and
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Other solids price. The other solids
price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S.
average NASS dry whey survey price
reported by the Department for the
month minus 14.98, with the result
multiplied by 1.03.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per
pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be calculated by
computing a weighted average of the 2
most recent U.S. average NASS AA
butter survey prices announced before
the 24th day of the month, subtracting
11.08 cents from this average, and
multiplying the result by 1.20.
(2) The Class III butterfat price per
pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent shall be the AA Butter
price reported by the Department’s
Dairy Market News for 40-lb. block
cheese for the month, less 16.5 cents
and multiply the result by 1.572.
*
*
*
*
*
Proposed by Dairy Farmers of America
Proposal No. 5
This proposal seeks to amend the
butterfat shrink adjustment contained in
the Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by adjusting the yield factor
contained in the butterfat price
computation from 1.20 to 1.215.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by revising
paragraphs (l) and (q)(3), to read as
follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price
per pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be the U.S.
average NASS AA butter survey price
reported by the Department for the
month less 11.5 cents, with the result
multiplied by 1.215.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per
pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be calculated by
computing a weighted average of the 2
most recent U.S. average NASS AA
butter survey prices announced before
the 24th day of the month, subtracting
11.5 cents from this average, and
multiplying the result by 1.215.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New
Mexico
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New
Mexico
Proposal No. 4
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by establishing a Class III
butterfat price that would be based on
the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)
price for 40-lb. block cheese.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by revising
paragraph (l) and removing paragraph
(n)(3) to read as follows:
Proposal No. 6
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Butterfat Price. The butterfat price
shall be as follows:
(1) The Class IV butterfat price per
pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be the CME AA
Butter price reported by the
Department’s Dairy Market News for the
month less 11.5 cents, with the result
multiplied by 1.20.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by changing the butterfat
shrink adjustment and yield factor from
1.20 to 1.211, and the butterfat recovery
percentage from 90 percent to 94
percent.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by:
a. revising paragraph (l);
b. revising paragraph (n)(3)(i) and
(n)(3)(ii); and
c. revising paragraph (q)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price
per pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be the U.S.
average NASS AA butter survey price
reported by the Department for the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6181
month less 11.5 cents, with the result
multiplied by 1.211.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Subtract 16.5 cents from the price
computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(1)
of this section and multiply the result
from 1.653; and
(ii) Subtract 0.94 times the butterfat
price computed pursuant to paragraph
(1) of this section from the amount
computed pursuant to paragraph
(n)(3)(i) of this section; and
*
*
*
*
*
(q) * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per
pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be calculated by
computing a weighted average of the 2
most recent U.S. average NASS AA
butter survey prices announced before
the 24th day of the month, subtracting
11.5 cents from this average, and
multiplying the result by 1.211.
Proposal No. 7
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by eliminating the farm-toplant shrink and butterfat shrink
adjustments to the yield factors.
Proposal No. 8
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by changing the nonfat solids
yield factor from 0.99 to 1.02 and
changing the protein price yield factors
for cheese from 1.383 to 1.405 and for
butter from 1.572 to 1.653.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by revising
paragraphs (m), (n)(2), and (n)(3)(i) to
read as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat
solids price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the
U.S. average nonfat dry milk survey
price reported by the Department for the
month less 14 cents and multiplying the
result by 1.02.
(n) * * *
(2) Subtract 16.5 cents from the price
computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(1)
of this section and multiply the result
by 1.405;
(3) * * *
(i) Subtract 16.5 cents from the price
computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(1)
of this section and multiply the result
by 1.653;
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6182
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Proposed by International Dairy Foods
Association
Proposal No. 9
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by adjusting the protein price
formula to reflect the lower value and
reduced volume of butterfat recoverable
as whey cream.
Proposed by Agri-Mark Dairy
Cooperative
Proposal No. 10
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by reducing the protein price
to reflect the lower price of whey butter.
2. Amend § 1000.50 by adding a new
paragraph (n)(4), to read as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(4) Subtract the difference between
the per pound value of AA butter and
whey butter from the price computed in
paragraph (n)(3) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Proposal No. 11
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by reducing the adjustment for
cheese manufactured in 500-pound
barrels contained in the protein price
formula from 3 cents to 1.5 cents.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by revising
paragraph (n)(1)(ii), to read as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The U.S. average NASS survey
price for 500-pound barrel cheddar
cheese (38 percent moisture) reported
by the Department for the month plus
1.5 cents;
*
*
*
*
*
Proposed by Dairy Farmers of America
and Northwest Dairy Association
Proposal No. 13
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by removing the barrel cheese
price as a cost component of the protein
price formula.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (n) introductory
text; and
(b) removing paragraphs (n)(1),
(n)(1)(i) and (n)(1)(ii).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) The U.S. average NASS survey
price for 40-lb. block cheese reported by
the Department for the month;
*
*
*
*
*
Proposed by Agri-Mark Dairy
Cooperative
Proposal No. 14
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by using a combination of the
weekly NASS and CME cheese price
series to determine the cheese price to
be used in the Class III and Class IV
product price formulas.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New
Mexico
Proposal No. 12
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by eliminating the 3-cent cost
adjustment for cheese manufactured in
500-pound barrels contained in the
protein price formula.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by revising
paragraph (n)(1)(ii), to read as follows:
Proposal No. 15
This proposal seeks to use a
combination of the NASS price series
and the CME price series to determine
the price of butter, cheese, nonfat dry
milk and dry whey to be used in the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas. In addition, this proposal
would direct NASS to survey total milk
components purchased and their prices
during the NASS Dairy Product Price
Survey.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by:
(a) revising the introductory text;
(b) revising paragraph (l);
(c) revising paragraph (m);
(d) revising paragraph (n)(1); and
(e) revising paragraphs (q)
introductory text, (q)(1)(i), (q)(2)(ii), and
(q)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
Class prices per hundredweight of
milk containing 3.5 percent butterfat,
Proposed by International Dairy Foods
Association
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
(1) * * *
(ii) The U.S. average NASS survey
price for 500-pound barrel cheddar
cheese (38 percent moisture) reported
by the Department for the month;
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
16:55 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
component prices, and advanced
pricing factors shall be as follows. The
prices and pricing factors described in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), (f) and (q) of
this section shall be based on a simple
average of the most recent 2 weekly
prices announced by the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange (CME) as reported
in Dairy Market News and the prices
described in paragraph (o) of this
section shall be based on a weighted
average for the preceding month of the
weekly prices announced by the
National Agricultural Statistical Service
(NASS) before the 24th day of the
month. These prices shall be announced
on or before the 23rd day of the month
and shall apply to milk received during
the following month. The prices
described in paragraphs (g) through (n)
and (p) of this section shall be based on
a simple daily average for the preceding
month of weekly prices announced by
the CME as reported in Dairy Market
News and the prices described in
paragraph (o) of this section shall be
based on a weighted average for the
preceding month of the weekly prices
announced by NASS. These prices shall
be announced on or before the 5th day
of the month and shall apply to milk
received during the preceding month.
The price described in paragraph (d) of
this section shall be derived from the
Class II skim milk price announced on
or before the 23rd day of the month
preceding the month to which it applies
and the butterfat price announced on or
before the 5th day of the month
following the month to which it applies.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price
per pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be the simply
daily average AA Butter survey price
reported by the CME as reported in
Dairy Market News for the month less
11.5 cents, with the result multiplied by
1.20.
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat
solids price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the
simply daily average nonfat dry milk
survey price reported by the CME as
reported in Dairy Market News for the
month less 14 cents and multiplying the
result by 0.99.
(n) * * *
(1) Compute a simple daily average of
the amounts described in paragraphs
(n)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section:
(i) The U.S. average NASS survey
price for 40-lb. block cheese reported by
the CME as reported in Dairy Market
News for the month; and
(ii) The U.S. average NASS survey
price for 500-pound barrel cheddar
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(i) Class III skim milk price. The Class
III skim milk price per hundredweight,
rounded to the nearest cent, shall be the
protein price per pound times 3.1.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(4) Add to the amount computed
pursuant to paragraph (n)(3) of this
section the U.S. average NASS dry whey
survey price reported by the Department
for the month minus 19.56 cents, with
the result multiplied by 1.96, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Following the procedure set forth
in paragraph (n) of this section, but
using the weighted average of the 2 most
recent NASS U.S. average weekly
survey prices announced before the 24th
day of the month, compute a protein
price;
*
*
*
*
*
2. Amend § 1000.53 by removing
paragraph (a)(10) and redesignating
paragraph (a)(11) as (a)(10).
Proposed by National All-Jersey Inc.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
cheese (38 percent moisture) reported
by the CME for the month plus 3 cents;
*
*
*
*
*
(q) Advanced pricing factors. For the
purpose of computing the Class I skim
milk price, the Class II skim milk price,
the Class II nonfat solids price and the
Class I butterfat price for the following
month, the following pricing factors
shall be computed using the simple
daily average of the 2 most recent CME
average prices for butterfat, cheese, and
nonfat dry milk as reported in Dairy
Market News and the NASS weighted
average dry whey price from weekly
survey prices announced before the 24th
day of the month:
(1) * * *
(i) Following the procedure set forth
in paragraphs (n) and (o) of this section,
but using the simple daily average of the
2 most recent weeks’ CME prices for
cheese and butter and the weighted
average of the 2 most recent average
weekly survey prices for dry whey
announced before the 24th day of the
month, compute a protein price and an
other solids price;
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) Following the procedure set forth
in paragraph (m) of this section, but
using the simple daily average prices of
the 2 most recent weeks CME prices as
reported in Dairy Market News before
the 24th day of the month, compute a
nonfat solids price; and
*
*
*
*
*
(3) An advanced butterfat price per
pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be calculated by
computing a simple daily average of the
2 most recent weeks’ CME AA Butter
prices as reported in Dairy Market News
announced before the 24th day of the
month, subtracting 11.5 cents from this
average, and multiplying the result by
1.20.
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
Proposal No. 16
This proposal would amend the Class
III and Class IV product price formulas
by eliminating the other solids price and
adding the equivalent value of dry whey
to the protein price formula.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (i);
(b) adding new paragraph (n)(4);
(c) removing paragraph (o);
(d) revising paragraph (q)(1)(i); and
(e) removing paragraphs (q)(1)(ii) and
(q)(1)(iv).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 1000.50 Class prices, component prices,
and advanced pricing factors.
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
17:45 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
Proposed by National Milk Producers
Federation
Proposal No. 17
This proposal seeks to amend the
Class III and Class IV product price
formulas to incorporating a monthly
energy cost adjustment based on
monthly changes in the producer price
indices for industrial natural gas and
industrial electricity as published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1. Amend § 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (l);
(b) revising paragraph (m);
(c) revising paragraph (n)(2); and
(d) revising paragraphs (n)(3)
introductory text, (n)(3)(i) and (o).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price
per pound, rounded to the nearest onehundredth cent, shall be:
(1) The U.S. average NASS AA Butter
survey price reported by the Department
for the month,
(2) Less a manufacturing cost
allowance equal to:
(i) 12.02 cents plus,
(ii) 0.5 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Natural Gas reported by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics minus
201.7 and divided by 201.7 plus,
(iii) 0.9 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Electricity reported by the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6183
Bureau of Labor Statistics minus 147.2
and divided by 147.2;
(3) With the result multiplied by 1.20.
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat
solids price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be:
(1) The U.S. average NASS nonfat dry
milk survey price reported by the
Department for the month,
(2) Less a manufacturing cost
allowance equal to:
(i) 15.7 cents plus
(ii) 3.0 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Natural Gas reported by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics minus
201.7 and divided by 201.7, plus
(iii) 1.5 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Electricity reported by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics minus 147.2
and divided by 147.2;
(3) With the result multiplied by 0.99.
(n) * * *
(2) From the price computed pursuant
to paragraph (n)(1) of this section
subtract a manufacturing cost allowance
equal to:
(i) 16.82 cents, plus
(ii) 0.7 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Natural Gas reported by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics minus
201.7 and divided by 201.7 plus,
(iii) 0.8 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Electricity reported by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics minus 147.2
and divided by 147.2;
(3) Multiply the amount computed to
paragraph (n)(2) of this section by 1.383,
then an amount computed as follows:
(i) Subtract the manufacturing cost
allowance computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(2) of this section from the
price computed pursuant to paragraph
(n)(1) of this section and multiply the
result by 1.572;
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Other solids price. The other solids
price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be:
(1) The U.S. average NASS dry whey
survey price reported by the Department
for the month,
(2) Less a manufacturing cost
allowance equal to:
(i) 19.56 cents plus,
(ii) 2.3 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Natural Gas reported by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics minus
201.7 and divided by 201.7 plus,
(iii) 1.5 cents times a figure equal to
the latest monthly Producer Price Index
for Industrial Electricity reported by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics minus 147.2
and divided by 147.2;
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6184
*
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(3) With the result multiplied by 1.03.
*
*
*
*
Proposed by Maine Dairy Industry
Association
Proposal No. 18
This proposal seeks to incorporate a
factor to account for any monthly spread
between component price calculations
for milk and a competitive pay price for
equivalent Grade A milk.
The proposal seeks to derive a factor
by using an updated version of the
Department’s 1994–1996 simulated
analysis of a competitive pay price for
Grade A milk. The proposal would
modify the previously used survey to
adapt it to regulatory changes,
specifically related to component
pricing. The proposal seeks an outcome
whereby a survey of plants located in
nine States, including California, as
performed to develop a competitive
Grade A price series, would be used to
identify a spread, if any between the
component and competitive values of
Grade A raw milk. That spread, in
whole or in part, would be incorporated
into Federal order minimum prices.
Office of the Administrator,
Agricultural Marketing Service,
Office of the General Counsel,
Dairy Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service (Washington office)
and the Offices of all Market
Administrators.
Procedural matters are not subject to
the above prohibition and may be
discussed at any time.
Dated: February 5, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 07–570 Filed 2–6–07; 11:54 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EE–RM/STD–01–350]
RIN 1904–AA78
Proposal No. 19
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Proposed by Dairy Programs,
Agricultural Marketing Service
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Energy
Conservation Standards for
Residential Furnaces and Boilers
AGENCY:
For all Federal Milk Marketing
Orders, make such changes as may be
necessary to make the entire marketing
agreements and the orders conform with
any amendments thereto that may result
from this hearing.
Copies of this notice of hearing and
the orders may be procured from the
Market Administrator of each of the
aforesaid marketing areas, or from the
Hearing Clerk, United States
Department of Agriculture, STOP
9200—Room 1031, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
9200, or may be inspected there.
Copies of the transcript of testimony
taken at the hearing will not be available
for distribution through the Hearing
Clerk’s Office. If you wish to purchase
a copy, arrangements may be made with
the reporter at the hearing.
From the time that a hearing notice is
issued and until the issuance of a final
decision in a proceeding, Department
employees involved in the decisionmaking process are prohibited from
discussing the merits of the hearing
issues on an ex parte basis with any
person having an interest in the
proceeding. For this particular
proceeding, the prohibition applies to
employees in the following
organizational units:
Office of the Secretary of Agriculture,
SUMMARY: A notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) to amend the
current minimum energy conservation
standards for residential furnaces and
boilers was published in the Federal
Register on October 6, 2006. 71 FR
59204. On October 30, 2006, the
Department of Energy (DOE) held a
public meeting for interested parties to
provide comments and discuss relevant
issues. At the public meeting, DOE
indicated it would respond to two
particular questions that stakeholders
raised regarding DOE’s NOPR estimates
for potential energy savings associated
with regional standards for nonweatherized gas furnaces in Northern
regions, and regarding new installation
costs for oil-fired furnaces. This notice
both addresses the stakeholders
questions and reopens the comment
period to provide an opportunity for
public review and comment on DOE’s
response to each question.
DATES: DOE will accept comments until
February 26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: DOE will accept comments,
data, and information regarding the
proposed rule no later than the date
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:52 Feb 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of data availability and
reopening of comment period.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provided in the DATES section. Any
comments submitted must include the
docket number EE–RM/STD–01–350
and/or Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) 1904–AA78. Comments may be
submitted using any of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. E-mail:ResidentialFBNOPR
Comments@ee.doe.gov. Include the
docket number EE–RM/STD–01–350
and/or RIN 1904–AA78 in the subject
line of the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Please
submit one signed original paper copy.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program,
Room 1J–018, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20585.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please
submit one signed original paper copy.
Electronic comments must be submitted
in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word,
Portable Document Format (PDF), or
text (ASCII) file format. Avoid the use
of special characters or any form of
encryption.
Copies of public comments may be
examined in the Resource Room of the
Appliance Standards Office of the
Building Technologies Program, Room
1J–018 in the Forrestal Building at the
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. Please
call Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones at the
above telephone number for additional
information about visiting the Resource
Room.
Please note: the DOE’s Freedom of
Information Reading Room (formerly Room
1E–190 at the Forrestal Building) is no longer
servicing rulemakings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mohammed Khan, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Forrestal Building,
Mailstop EE–2J, 1000 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0121, (202) 586–7892, E-mail:
Mohammed.Khan@ee.doe.gov; or
Francine Pinto, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of General Counsel,
Forrestal Building, Mailstop GC–72,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–7432,
E-mail: Francine.Pinto@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 27 (Friday, February 9, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6179-6184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-570]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 27 / Friday, February 9, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 6179]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1030, 1032, 1033, 1124,
1126, and 1131
[Docket No. AO-14-A77, et al.; DA-07-02]
Milk in the Northeast and Other Marketing Areas; Notice of
Hearing on Proposed Amendments to Tentative Marketing Agreements and
Orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 CFR Part Marketing area AO numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1001................ Northeast............... AO-14-A77.
1005................ Appalachian............. AO-388-A21.
1006................ Florida................. AO-356-A42.
10 Southeast............... AO-366-A50.
0
7.
1030................ Upper Midwest........... AO-361-A43.
1032................ Central................. AO-313-A52.
1033................ Mideast................. AO-166-A76.
1124................ Pacific Northwest....... AO-368-A38.
1126................ Southwest............... AO-231-A71.
1131................ Arizona................. AO-271-A43.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; Notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: A national public hearing is being held to consider and take
evidence on proposals seeking to amend the Class III and Class IV
product price formulas applicable to all Federal milk marketing orders.
DATES: The hearing will convene at 9 a.m., Monday, February 26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at the Holiday Inn Select--
Strongsville, 15471 Royalton Road, Strongsville, Ohio 44136, phone
(440) 238-8800.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Rower, Marketing Specialist,
Order Formulation and Enforcement, USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop 0231--
Room 2971, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0231,
(202) 720-2357, e-mail address: jack.rower@usda.gov.
Persons requiring a sign language interpreter or other special
accommodations should contact Paul Huber, Assistant Market
Administrator, at (330) 225-4758; e-mail: phuber@fmmaclev.com before
the hearing begins.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This administrative action is governed by
the provisions of Sections 556 and 557 of Title 5 of the United States
Code and, therefore, is excluded from the requirements of Executive
Order 12866.
Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held at the
Holiday Inn Select, Strongsville, Ohio, beginning at 9 a.m. on Monday,
February 26, 2007, with respect to proposed amendments to the tentative
marketing agreements and to the orders regulating the handling of milk
in the Northeast and other marketing areas.
The hearing is called pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the
formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR Part
900).
The purpose of the hearing is to receive evidence with respect to
the economic and marketing conditions which relate to the proposed
amendments, hereinafter set forth, and any appropriate modifications
thereof, to the tentative marketing agreements and to the orders.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Actions under the Federal milk order program are subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This Act seeks to
ensure that, within the statutory authority of a program, the
regulatory and information collection requirements are tailored to the
size and nature of small businesses. For the purpose of the Act, a
dairy farm is a ``small business'' if it has an annual gross revenue of
less than $750,000, and a dairy products manufacturer is a ``small
business'' if it has fewer than 500 employees (13 CFR 121.201). Most
parties subject to a milk order are considered as a small business.
For the purposes of determining which dairy farms are ``small
businesses,'' the $750,000 per year criterion was used to establish a
production guideline of 500,000 pounds per month. Although this
guideline does not factor in additional monies that may be received by
dairy producers, it should be an inclusive standard for most ``small''
dairy farmers. For purposes of determining a handler's size, if the
plant is part of a larger company operating multiple plants that
collectively exceed the 500-employee limit, the plant will be
considered a large business even if the local plant has fewer than 500
employees.
USDA has identified that during 2005 approximately 51,060 of the
54,652 dairy producers whose milk is pooled on Federal orders are small
businesses. Small businesses represent about 93 percent of the dairy
farmers who participate in the Federal milk order program.
On the processing side, during June 2005 there were approximately
350 fully regulated plants (of which 149 or 43 percent were small
businesses) and 110 partially regulated plants (of which 50 or 45
percent were small businesses.) In addition, there were 48 producer-
handlers, of which 29 were considered small businesses for the purposes
of this initial regulatory flexibility analysis, who submitted reports
under the Federal milk order program during this period.
The fluid use of milk represented about 45.0 percent of total
Federal milk marketing order producer deliveries during January 2006.
Almost 237 million Americans, approximately 80 percent of the total
U.S. population reside within the geographical boundaries of the 10
Federal milk marketing areas.
In order to accomplish the goal of imposing no additional
regulatory burdens on the industry, a review of the current reporting
requirements was completed pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). In light of that review, it was
determined that these proposed amendments would have little or no
impact on reporting, record keeping, or other compliance requirements
because these requirements would remain identical to those currently in
effect under the Federal order program. No new or additional reporting
would be necessary.
This notice does not require additional information collection that
requires clearance by the OMB beyond the currently approved information
collection. Information currently
[[Page 6180]]
collected through the use of OMB-approved forms and the primary sources
of data used to complete the forms are routinely used in business
transactions. The forms require only a minimal amount of information
that can be provided without data processing equipment or trained
statistical staff. Thus, the information collection burden is
relatively small. Requiring the same reports from all handlers does not
disadvantage any handler that is smaller than the industry average.
No other burdens are expected to fall upon the dairy industry as a
result of overlapping Federal rules. This proposed rulemaking does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any existing Federal rules.
To ensure that small businesses are not unduly or
disproportionately burdened based on these proposed amendments
consideration was given to mitigating any negative impacts. It is
expected that small producers would not experience any particular
disadvantage compared to larger producers as a result of the proposed
amendments. Similarly, it is expected that small handlers would not
experience any particular disadvantage compared to larger handlers as a
result of the proposed amendments. Possible changes to the Class III
and Class IV price formulas should not have any special impacts on
small handler entities. All handlers manufacturing dairy products from
milk classified as Class III or Class IV would remain subject to the
same minimum prices regardless of the size of their operations. Minimum
prices should not raise barriers regarding the ability of small
handlers to compete in the marketplace.
Interested parties are invited to present evidence on the probable
regulatory and information collection impact of the hearing proposals
on small businesses. Also, such parties may suggest modifications of
the proposal for tailoring its applicability to small businesses.
Preliminary Economic Analysis and Detailed Analysis Information
A preliminary economic analysis as well as additional detailed
analysis, data and information used in developing the preliminary
economic analysis are presented at the AMS Dairy Programs Web site,
https://www.ams.usda.gov/dairy.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to the rules proposed herein have been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are not
intended to have a retroactive effect. If adopted, the proposed
amendments would not preempt any state or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act provides that
administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file
suit in court. Under Section 8c(15)(A) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 608c
(15)(A)), any handler subject to an order may request modification or
exemption from such order by filing with the Department of Agriculture
(Department) a petition stating that the order, any provision of the
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in
accordance with the law. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After a hearing, the Department would rule on
the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has
its principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review
the Department's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is
filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Interested parties who wish to introduce exhibits should provide
the Presiding Officer at the hearing with (6) copies of such exhibits
for the Official Record. Also, it would be helpful if additional copies
are available for the use of other participants at the hearing.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1030,
1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and 1131
Milk marketing orders.
The authority citation for 7 CFR Parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006,
1007, 1030, 1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and 1131 read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674, and 7253.
The proposed amendments, as set forth below, have not received the
approval of the Department.
Proposed by Agri-Mark Dairy Cooperative
Proposal 1
This proposal seeks to amend the manufacturing allowances for Class
III and Class IV product formulas, as enumerated in Sec. 1000.50 that
may include the most current plant cost survey information available.
Specifically, this proposal seeks to amend Sec. 1000.50 milk price
formulas by revising the existing manufacturing allowances for butter,
nonfat dry milk, cheese, and whey powder based upon evidence obtained
from the hearing record. Amendments to these manufacturing allowances
would directly affect the milk component values used in Federal order
milk price formulas for all classes of milk.
Proposal 2
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
formulas to annually update the manufacturing allowances using an
annual manufacturing cost survey of cheese, whey powder, butter and
nonfat dry milk plants (located outside of California.) The proposed
amendments would grant authority to the Market Administrator to
administer the survey, select the sample plants, and collect, audit and
assemble cost information. The proposal seeks to use the annual
manufacturing cost survey data to annually update manufacturing
allowances at a level that is the higher of the following:
(1) Manufacturing costs would be set at a level that would allow
minimum percentages of milk volume used and plants in the entire Class
III and Class IV manufacturing plant population outside of California
to cover their costs; or
(2) Manufacturing allowances would be set at a level that would
allow minimum percentages of the milk used by Class III and Class IV
manufacturing plants and the number of plants in any specific Federal
order pooling at least 2 billion pounds of milk annually to cover their
costs.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New Mexico
Proposal No. 3
This proposal seeks to amend the manufacturing allowances contained
in the Class III and Class IV product price formulas. Specifically,
this proposal seeks to change the butter make allowance butter from
11.5 cents to 11.08 cents, change the nonfat dry milk make allowance
from 14 cents to 14.10 cents, change the cheese make allowance from
16.5 cents to 16.38 cents, and change the dry whey make allowance from
15.9 cents to 14.98 cents.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (l);
(b) revising paragraph (m);
(c) revising paragraph (n)(2) and (n)(3)(i);
(d) revising paragraph (o); and
(e) revising paragraph (q)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
[[Page 6181]]
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S. average NASS AA butter
survey price reported by the Department for the month less 11.08 cents,
with the result multiplied by 1.20.
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat solids price per pound, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S. average NASS
nonfat dry milk survey price reported by the Department for the month
less 14.10 cents and multiplying the result by 0.99.
(n) * * *
(2) Subtract 16.38 cents from the price computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(1) of this section and multiply the result by 1.383;
(3) * * *
(i) Subtract 16.38 cents from the price computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(1) of this section and multiply the result by 1.572; and
* * * * *
(o) Other solids price. The other solids price per pound, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S. average NASS dry
whey survey price reported by the Department for the month minus 14.98,
with the result multiplied by 1.03.
* * * * *
(q) * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be calculated by computing a weighted average
of the 2 most recent U.S. average NASS AA butter survey prices
announced before the 24th day of the month, subtracting 11.08 cents
from this average, and multiplying the result by 1.20.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New Mexico
Proposal No. 4
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by establishing a Class III butterfat price that would
be based on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) price for 40-lb.
block cheese.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by revising paragraph (l) and removing
paragraph (n)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(l) Butterfat Price. The butterfat price shall be as follows:
(1) The Class IV butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be the CME AA Butter price reported by the
Department's Dairy Market News for the month less 11.5 cents, with the
result multiplied by 1.20.
(2) The Class III butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent shall be the AA Butter price reported by the
Department's Dairy Market News for 40-lb. block cheese for the month,
less 16.5 cents and multiply the result by 1.572.
* * * * *
Proposed by Dairy Farmers of America
Proposal No. 5
This proposal seeks to amend the butterfat shrink adjustment
contained in the Class III and Class IV product price formulas by
adjusting the yield factor contained in the butterfat price computation
from 1.20 to 1.215.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by revising paragraphs (l) and (q)(3), to
read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S. average NASS AA butter
survey price reported by the Department for the month less 11.5 cents,
with the result multiplied by 1.215.
* * * * *
(q) * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be calculated by computing a weighted average
of the 2 most recent U.S. average NASS AA butter survey prices
announced before the 24th day of the month, subtracting 11.5 cents from
this average, and multiplying the result by 1.215.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New Mexico
Proposal No. 6
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by changing the butterfat shrink adjustment and yield
factor from 1.20 to 1.211, and the butterfat recovery percentage from
90 percent to 94 percent.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by:
a. revising paragraph (l);
b. revising paragraph (n)(3)(i) and (n)(3)(ii); and
c. revising paragraph (q)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S. average NASS AA butter
survey price reported by the Department for the month less 11.5 cents,
with the result multiplied by 1.211.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Subtract 16.5 cents from the price computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(1) of this section and multiply the result from 1.653;
and
(ii) Subtract 0.94 times the butterfat price computed pursuant to
paragraph (1) of this section from the amount computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(3)(i) of this section; and
* * * * *
(q) * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be calculated by computing a weighted average
of the 2 most recent U.S. average NASS AA butter survey prices
announced before the 24th day of the month, subtracting 11.5 cents from
this average, and multiplying the result by 1.211.
Proposal No. 7
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by eliminating the farm-to-plant shrink and butterfat
shrink adjustments to the yield factors.
Proposal No. 8
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by changing the nonfat solids yield factor from 0.99 to
1.02 and changing the protein price yield factors for cheese from 1.383
to 1.405 and for butter from 1.572 to 1.653.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by revising paragraphs (m), (n)(2), and
(n)(3)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat solids price per pound, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the U.S. average nonfat dry
milk survey price reported by the Department for the month less 14
cents and multiplying the result by 1.02.
(n) * * *
(2) Subtract 16.5 cents from the price computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(1) of this section and multiply the result by 1.405;
(3) * * *
(i) Subtract 16.5 cents from the price computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(1) of this section and multiply the result by 1.653;
* * * * *
[[Page 6182]]
Proposed by International Dairy Foods Association
Proposal No. 9
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by adjusting the protein price formula to reflect the
lower value and reduced volume of butterfat recoverable as whey cream.
Proposed by Agri-Mark Dairy Cooperative
Proposal No. 10
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by reducing the protein price to reflect the lower price
of whey butter.
2. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by adding a new paragraph (n)(4), to read as
follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(4) Subtract the difference between the per pound value of AA
butter and whey butter from the price computed in paragraph (n)(3) of
this section.
* * * * *
Proposal No. 11
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by reducing the adjustment for cheese manufactured in
500-pound barrels contained in the protein price formula from 3 cents
to 1.5 cents.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by revising paragraph (n)(1)(ii), to read as
follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The U.S. average NASS survey price for 500-pound barrel
cheddar cheese (38 percent moisture) reported by the Department for the
month plus 1.5 cents;
* * * * *
Proposed by International Dairy Foods Association
Proposal No. 12
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by eliminating the 3-cent cost adjustment for cheese
manufactured in 500-pound barrels contained in the protein price
formula.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by revising paragraph (n)(1)(ii), to read as
follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The U.S. average NASS survey price for 500-pound barrel
cheddar cheese (38 percent moisture) reported by the Department for the
month;
* * * * *
Proposed by Dairy Farmers of America and Northwest Dairy Association
Proposal No. 13
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by removing the barrel cheese price as a cost component
of the protein price formula.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (n) introductory text; and
(b) removing paragraphs (n)(1), (n)(1)(i) and (n)(1)(ii).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(n) The U.S. average NASS survey price for 40-lb. block cheese
reported by the Department for the month;
* * * * *
Proposed by Agri-Mark Dairy Cooperative
Proposal No. 14
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas by using a combination of the weekly NASS and CME cheese
price series to determine the cheese price to be used in the Class III
and Class IV product price formulas.
Proposed by Dairy Producers of New Mexico
Proposal No. 15
This proposal seeks to use a combination of the NASS price series
and the CME price series to determine the price of butter, cheese,
nonfat dry milk and dry whey to be used in the Class III and Class IV
product price formulas. In addition, this proposal would direct NASS to
survey total milk components purchased and their prices during the NASS
Dairy Product Price Survey.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by:
(a) revising the introductory text;
(b) revising paragraph (l);
(c) revising paragraph (m);
(d) revising paragraph (n)(1); and
(e) revising paragraphs (q) introductory text, (q)(1)(i),
(q)(2)(ii), and (q)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
Class prices per hundredweight of milk containing 3.5 percent
butterfat, component prices, and advanced pricing factors shall be as
follows. The prices and pricing factors described in paragraphs (a),
(b), (c), (e), (f) and (q) of this section shall be based on a simple
average of the most recent 2 weekly prices announced by the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange (CME) as reported in Dairy Market News and the
prices described in paragraph (o) of this section shall be based on a
weighted average for the preceding month of the weekly prices announced
by the National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) before the 24th
day of the month. These prices shall be announced on or before the 23rd
day of the month and shall apply to milk received during the following
month. The prices described in paragraphs (g) through (n) and (p) of
this section shall be based on a simple daily average for the preceding
month of weekly prices announced by the CME as reported in Dairy Market
News and the prices described in paragraph (o) of this section shall be
based on a weighted average for the preceding month of the weekly
prices announced by NASS. These prices shall be announced on or before
the 5th day of the month and shall apply to milk received during the
preceding month. The price described in paragraph (d) of this section
shall be derived from the Class II skim milk price announced on or
before the 23rd day of the month preceding the month to which it
applies and the butterfat price announced on or before the 5th day of
the month following the month to which it applies.
* * * * *
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the simply daily average AA Butter
survey price reported by the CME as reported in Dairy Market News for
the month less 11.5 cents, with the result multiplied by 1.20.
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat solids price per pound, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be the simply daily average
nonfat dry milk survey price reported by the CME as reported in Dairy
Market News for the month less 14 cents and multiplying the result by
0.99.
(n) * * *
(1) Compute a simple daily average of the amounts described in
paragraphs (n)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section:
(i) The U.S. average NASS survey price for 40-lb. block cheese
reported by the CME as reported in Dairy Market News for the month; and
(ii) The U.S. average NASS survey price for 500-pound barrel
cheddar
[[Page 6183]]
cheese (38 percent moisture) reported by the CME for the month plus 3
cents;
* * * * *
(q) Advanced pricing factors. For the purpose of computing the
Class I skim milk price, the Class II skim milk price, the Class II
nonfat solids price and the Class I butterfat price for the following
month, the following pricing factors shall be computed using the simple
daily average of the 2 most recent CME average prices for butterfat,
cheese, and nonfat dry milk as reported in Dairy Market News and the
NASS weighted average dry whey price from weekly survey prices
announced before the 24th day of the month:
(1) * * *
(i) Following the procedure set forth in paragraphs (n) and (o) of
this section, but using the simple daily average of the 2 most recent
weeks' CME prices for cheese and butter and the weighted average of the
2 most recent average weekly survey prices for dry whey announced
before the 24th day of the month, compute a protein price and an other
solids price;
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Following the procedure set forth in paragraph (m) of this
section, but using the simple daily average prices of the 2 most recent
weeks CME prices as reported in Dairy Market News before the 24th day
of the month, compute a nonfat solids price; and
* * * * *
(3) An advanced butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest
one-hundredth cent, shall be calculated by computing a simple daily
average of the 2 most recent weeks' CME AA Butter prices as reported in
Dairy Market News announced before the 24th day of the month,
subtracting 11.5 cents from this average, and multiplying the result by
1.20.
Proposed by National All-Jersey Inc.
Proposal No. 16
This proposal would amend the Class III and Class IV product price
formulas by eliminating the other solids price and adding the
equivalent value of dry whey to the protein price formula.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (i);
(b) adding new paragraph (n)(4);
(c) removing paragraph (o);
(d) revising paragraph (q)(1)(i); and
(e) removing paragraphs (q)(1)(ii) and (q)(1)(iv).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(i) Class III skim milk price. The Class III skim milk price per
hundredweight, rounded to the nearest cent, shall be the protein price
per pound times 3.1.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(4) Add to the amount computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(3) of this
section the U.S. average NASS dry whey survey price reported by the
Department for the month minus 19.56 cents, with the result multiplied
by 1.96, rounded to the nearest one-hundredth cent.
* * * * *
(q) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Following the procedure set forth in paragraph (n) of this
section, but using the weighted average of the 2 most recent NASS U.S.
average weekly survey prices announced before the 24th day of the
month, compute a protein price;
* * * * *
2. Amend Sec. 1000.53 by removing paragraph (a)(10) and
redesignating paragraph (a)(11) as (a)(10).
Proposed by National Milk Producers Federation
Proposal No. 17
This proposal seeks to amend the Class III and Class IV product
price formulas to incorporating a monthly energy cost adjustment based
on monthly changes in the producer price indices for industrial natural
gas and industrial electricity as published by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
1. Amend Sec. 1000.50 by:
(a) revising paragraph (l);
(b) revising paragraph (m);
(c) revising paragraph (n)(2); and
(d) revising paragraphs (n)(3) introductory text, (n)(3)(i) and
(o).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1000.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing
factors.
* * * * *
(l) Butterfat price. The butterfat price per pound, rounded to the
nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be:
(1) The U.S. average NASS AA Butter survey price reported by the
Department for the month,
(2) Less a manufacturing cost allowance equal to:
(i) 12.02 cents plus,
(ii) 0.5 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Natural Gas reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 201.7 and divided by 201.7 plus,
(iii) 0.9 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Electricity reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 147.2 and divided by 147.2;
(3) With the result multiplied by 1.20.
(m) Nonfat solids price. The nonfat solids price per pound, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be:
(1) The U.S. average NASS nonfat dry milk survey price reported by
the Department for the month,
(2) Less a manufacturing cost allowance equal to:
(i) 15.7 cents plus
(ii) 3.0 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Natural Gas reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 201.7 and divided by 201.7, plus
(iii) 1.5 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Electricity reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 147.2 and divided by 147.2;
(3) With the result multiplied by 0.99.
(n) * * *
(2) From the price computed pursuant to paragraph (n)(1) of this
section subtract a manufacturing cost allowance equal to:
(i) 16.82 cents, plus
(ii) 0.7 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Natural Gas reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 201.7 and divided by 201.7 plus,
(iii) 0.8 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Electricity reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 147.2 and divided by 147.2;
(3) Multiply the amount computed to paragraph (n)(2) of this
section by 1.383, then an amount computed as follows:
(i) Subtract the manufacturing cost allowance computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(2) of this section from the price computed pursuant to
paragraph (n)(1) of this section and multiply the result by 1.572;
* * * * *
(o) Other solids price. The other solids price per pound, rounded
to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be:
(1) The U.S. average NASS dry whey survey price reported by the
Department for the month,
(2) Less a manufacturing cost allowance equal to:
(i) 19.56 cents plus,
(ii) 2.3 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Natural Gas reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 201.7 and divided by 201.7 plus,
(iii) 1.5 cents times a figure equal to the latest monthly Producer
Price Index for Industrial Electricity reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics minus 147.2 and divided by 147.2;
[[Page 6184]]
(3) With the result multiplied by 1.03.
* * * * *
Proposed by Maine Dairy Industry Association
Proposal No. 18
This proposal seeks to incorporate a factor to account for any
monthly spread between component price calculations for milk and a
competitive pay price for equivalent Grade A milk.
The proposal seeks to derive a factor by using an updated version
of the Department's 1994-1996 simulated analysis of a competitive pay
price for Grade A milk. The proposal would modify the previously used
survey to adapt it to regulatory changes, specifically related to
component pricing. The proposal seeks an outcome whereby a survey of
plants located in nine States, including California, as performed to
develop a competitive Grade A price series, would be used to identify a
spread, if any between the component and competitive values of Grade A
raw milk. That spread, in whole or in part, would be incorporated into
Federal order minimum prices.
Proposed by Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service
Proposal No. 19
For all Federal Milk Marketing Orders, make such changes as may be
necessary to make the entire marketing agreements and the orders
conform with any amendments thereto that may result from this hearing.
Copies of this notice of hearing and the orders may be procured
from the Market Administrator of each of the aforesaid marketing areas,
or from the Hearing Clerk, United States Department of Agriculture,
STOP 9200--Room 1031, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20250-9200, or may be inspected there.
Copies of the transcript of testimony taken at the hearing will not
be available for distribution through the Hearing Clerk's Office. If
you wish to purchase a copy, arrangements may be made with the reporter
at the hearing.
From the time that a hearing notice is issued and until the
issuance of a final decision in a proceeding, Department employees
involved in the decision-making process are prohibited from discussing
the merits of the hearing issues on an ex parte basis with any person
having an interest in the proceeding. For this particular proceeding,
the prohibition applies to employees in the following organizational
units:
Office of the Secretary of Agriculture,
Office of the Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service,
Office of the General Counsel,
Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service (Washington office)
and the Offices of all Market Administrators.
Procedural matters are not subject to the above prohibition and may
be discussed at any time.
Dated: February 5, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 07-570 Filed 2-6-07; 11:54 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P