Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 5493-5494 [E7-1826]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 6, 2007 / Notices Issued on: January 30, 2007. Pamela M. Pelcovits, Office Director, Policy Plans and Regulation. [FR Doc. E7–1839 Filed 2–5–07; 8:45 am] Federal, State, or local enforcement official. Discussion of Comments BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P Conclusion sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION There were no comments to the docket, therefore, based upon its evaluation of the sixty-six exemption applications, FMCSA exempts, Louis T. Aceto, James D. Barton, Lawrence H. Behrens, Joel L. Bogenrief, Timothy W. Brogan, Eddy B. Brown, Kenneth E. Buck, Carolynda Cain, Roy B. Carter, Bradley D. Case, Jonathan M. Cleek, David D. Collart, Donald L. Cowan, Michael J. Drake, Thomas D. Dyke, Glenn D. Folkers, Anthony L. Gentry, Howard L. Gocke, James S. Goldman, Carol D. Hardin, Jerry Hardy, Michael T. Hartley, David A. Heider, John A. Helm, John A. Herbert, Lester H. Hughes, Gayle E. Jones, Gerald P. Kargus, Christopher A. Knott, Norman L. Krietemeyer, Jerome A. Krupka, James A. Kunkel, Mark W. Lavorini, Jeffrey C. Link, Londell W. Luther, Harry E. Marsh, Joseph C. McMasters, George R. McMullen, James B. Morris, Bradley S. Mowdy, James R. Murphy, Ronald W. Nelson, Vincent A. Palumbo, Kent E. Pelkey, Keith E. Peterson, Victor C. Port, Lee F. Powell, Allen W. Quon, Armand O. Rondeau, Carl J. Satariano, Randall W. Skaggs, Louis L. Sorenson, James L. Spencer, Ronald D. Stewart, Andy L. Strommenger, Richard J. Symonies, Sr., Douglas K. Thompson, Richard L. Thompson, James L. Tjon, Lowell T. Tucker, Shawn P. Wathley, John P. Westbay, John M. White, Jeffrey M. Wood, Christopher T. Worsley, and Fredrick J. Young from the ITDM standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject to the conditions listed under ‘‘Conditions and Requirements’’ above. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption will be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time. Federal Railroad Administration VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:03 Feb 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request Federal Railroad Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) hereby announces that it is seeking approval of the following information collection activities. Before submitting these information collection requirements for clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment on specific aspects of the activities identified below. Comments must be received no later than April 9, 2007. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Safety, Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of Support Systems Staff, RAD– 43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge receipt of their respective comments must include a self-addressed stamped postcard stating, ‘‘Comments on OMB control number 2130–New.’’ Alternatively, comments may be transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493– 6230 or (202) 493–6170, or E-mail to Mr. Brogan at robert.brogan@dot.gov, or to Ms. Christodoulou at gina.christodoulou@dot.gov. Please refer to the assigned OMB control number or collection title in any correspondence submitted. FRA will summarize comments received in response to this notice in a subsequent notice and include them in its information collection submission to OMB for approval. DATES: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5493 Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6292) or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of Support Systems Staff, RAD–43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6139). (These telephone numbers are not tollfree.) The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Pub. L. No. 104–13, § 2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR Part 1320, require Federal agencies to provide 60-days notice to the public for comment on information collection activities before seeking approval by OMB. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR §§ 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA invites interested respondents to comment on the following summary of proposed information collection activities regarding (i) Whether the information collection activities are necessary for FRA to properly execute its functions, including whether the activities will have practical utility; (ii) the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of the burden of the information collection activities, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used to determine the estimates; (iii) ways for FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information being collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to minimize the burden of information collection activities on the public by automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iv); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1)(i)–(iv). FRA believes that soliciting public comment will promote its efforts to reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens associated with the collection of information mandated by Federal regulations. In summary, FRA reasons that comments received will advance three objectives: (i) Reduce reporting burdens; (ii) ensure that it organizes information collection requirements in a ‘‘user friendly’’ format to improve the use of such information; and (iii) accurately assess the resources expended to retrieve and produce information requested. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501. Below is a brief summary of proposed new information collection activities that FRA will submit for clearance by OMB as required under the PRA: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 5494 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 6, 2007 / Notices Title: Causal Analysis and Countermeasures to Reduce Rail-Related Suicides. OMB Control Number: 2130–New. Abstract: Pedestrian trespassing on railroad property resulting in serious injury or death is one of the two most serious safety problems—the second being grade crossing collisions—facing the railroad industry and its regulators not only in the United States but also in other countries. It is widely believed in the United States that the reported prevalence and incidence of railway suicide vastly under-represents the nature and extent of the problem. There is no central reporting system within the railroad industry or suicide prevention field that provides verifiable information about how many trespass deaths are accidental versus intentional. Therefore, there are no verifiable measures of the extent of rail-related suicides in this country. While railroad companies must report trespass incidents resulting in serious injury or death to the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), injuries or deaths that are ruled by a medical examiner or coroner to be intentional are not reported. Preliminary figures from 2006 indicate there were approximately 500 deaths and 360 injuries reported to FRA—an increase of 100 incidents over the previous year—but suicides are not represented in these numbers. Unverifiable estimates from a number of sources range from 150 to more than 300 suicides per year on the U.S. railways. Like any other incident on the rail system, a suicide on the tracks results in equipment and facility damage, delays to train schedules, and trauma to railroad personnel involved in the incidents. As a result, FRA last year awarded a grant for the first phase of a five-year project to reduce suicides on the rail system to the Railroad Research Foundation (part of the Association of American Railroads) and its subcontractor, the American Association of Suicidology (AAS). In the course of the five-year project, the research project’s goals include: (i) A prevalence assessment to determine verifiable numbers of suicides on the rail system; (ii) Development of a standardized reporting tool for industry use; (iii) A causal analysis and root cause analysis of suicide incidents that occur during the grant cycle; and (iv) Design and implementation of suicide prevention measures for the nation’s rail system to reduce suicide injuries and deaths. AAS is also receiving a grant from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to study suicides on commuter rail lines throughout the country. Consequently, AAS has expanded its VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:03 Feb 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 study to include commuter lines as well, and will be using the same collection instruments once they are approved by the Office of Management and Budget. This collection of information pertains to Phase II of the project, the causal analysis. In order to understand as much as possible about people who intend to die by placing themselves in the path of a train and, therefore, to design prevention strategies, AAS intends to conduct 70 psychological autopsies over the course of two years on people who die by rail-related suicide. Psychological autopsy is a recognized and accepted method for obtaining information about physical, emotional, and circumstantial contributors to a person’s death. The 70 psychological autopsies proposed for the FRA and FTA projects will involve interviews with witnesses to these incidents—rail and commuter personnel and members of the public—as well as family members, friends, employers, and co-workers. After conducting a root cause analysis of this data, AAS will then work with the industry to design, pilot test, and implement effective countermeasures with the goal of reducing deaths, injuries, and psychological trauma. Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.125A; FRA F 6180.125B. Affected Public: Railroad Personnel, Members of the Public, Affected Family and Friends. Respondent Universe: 210 Railroad Personnel/Members of the Public/ Affected Family and Friends. Frequency of Submission: On occasion. Estimated Annual Burden: 60 hours. Status: Regular Review. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR §§ 1320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Authority: 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3520. Issued in Washington, DC on January 31, 2007. D.J. Stadtler, Director, Office of Budget, Federal Railroad Administration. [FR Doc. E7–1826 Filed 2–5–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–06–P PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA 2006–26656; Notice 2] Continental Tire North America, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance Continental Tire North America (Continental) has determined that certain tires it produced in 2006 do not comply with S5.5(f) of 49 CFR 571.139, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 139, ‘‘New pneumatic radial tires for light vehicles.’’ Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Continental has petitioned for a determination that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety and has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, ‘‘Defect and Noncompliance Reports.’’ Notice of receipt of a petition was published, with a 30-day comment period, on December 26, 2006, in the Federal Register (71 FR 77436). NHTSA received no comments. Affected are a total of approximately 1,369 model 225/70R16 103S Continental and General replacement tires manufactured during October 2006. S5.5(f) of FMVSS No. 139 requires the actual number of plies in the tread area to be molded on both sidewalls of each tire. The noncompliant tires are marked on the sidewall ‘‘TREAD 5 PLIES 2 STEEL + 2 POLYESTER + 1 NYLON’’ whereas the correct marking should be ‘‘TREAD 4 PLIES 2 STEEL + 2 POLYESTER.’’ Continental has corrected the problem that caused these errors so that they will not be repeated in future production. Continental Tire believes that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety and that no corrective action is warranted. Continental Tire states, All other sidewall identification markings and safety information are correct. This noncompliant sidewall marking does not affect the safety, performance and durability of the tire; the tires were built as designed. The agency agrees with Continental that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. The agency believes that the true measure of inconsequentiality to motor vehicle safety in this case is that there is no effect of the noncompliance on the operational safety of vehicles on which these tires are mounted. The safety of people working in the tire retread, repair, and recycling industries must also be considered. Although tire construction affects the strength and durability, neither the E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5493-5494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its 
implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 
hereby announces that it is seeking approval of the following 
information collection activities. Before submitting these information 
collection requirements for clearance by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment on specific aspects of 
the activities identified below.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than April 9, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following 
proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of 
Safety, Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad 
Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 
20590, or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of Support Systems Staff, RAD-
43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 
35, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge 
receipt of their respective comments must include a self-addressed 
stamped postcard stating, ``Comments on OMB control number 2130-New.'' 
Alternatively, comments may be transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493-
6230 or (202) 493-6170, or E-mail to Mr. Brogan at 
robert.brogan@dot.gov, or to Ms. Christodoulou at 
gina.christodoulou@dot.gov. Please refer to the assigned OMB control 
number or collection title in any correspondence submitted. FRA will 
summarize comments received in response to this notice in a subsequent 
notice and include them in its information collection submission to OMB 
for approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning 
and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 
Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 
493-6292) or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of Support Systems Staff, 
RAD-43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail 
Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493-6139). (These 
telephone numbers are not toll-free.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 
Pub. L. No. 104-13, Sec.  2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised 
at 44 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 
CFR Part 1320, require Federal agencies to provide 60-days notice to 
the public for comment on information collection activities before 
seeking approval by OMB. 44 U.S.C. Sec.  3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 
Sec. Sec.  1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA 
invites interested respondents to comment on the following summary of 
proposed information collection activities regarding (i) Whether the 
information collection activities are necessary for FRA to properly 
execute its functions, including whether the activities will have 
practical utility; (ii) the accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden 
of the information collection activities, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used to determine the estimates; (iii) ways 
for FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
being collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to minimize the burden of 
information collection activities on the public by automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C. Sec.  3506(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iv); 5 
CFR 1320.8(d)(1)(i)-(iv). FRA believes that soliciting public comment 
will promote its efforts to reduce the administrative and paperwork 
burdens associated with the collection of information mandated by 
Federal regulations. In summary, FRA reasons that comments received 
will advance three objectives: (i) Reduce reporting burdens; (ii) 
ensure that it organizes information collection requirements in a 
``user friendly'' format to improve the use of such information; and 
(iii) accurately assess the resources expended to retrieve and produce 
information requested. See 44 U.S.C. Sec.  3501.
    Below is a brief summary of proposed new information collection 
activities that FRA will submit for clearance by OMB as required under 
the PRA:

[[Page 5494]]

    Title: Causal Analysis and Countermeasures to Reduce Rail-Related 
Suicides.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-New.
    Abstract: Pedestrian trespassing on railroad property resulting in 
serious injury or death is one of the two most serious safety 
problems--the second being grade crossing collisions--facing the 
railroad industry and its regulators not only in the United States but 
also in other countries. It is widely believed in the United States 
that the reported prevalence and incidence of railway suicide vastly 
under-represents the nature and extent of the problem. There is no 
central reporting system within the railroad industry or suicide 
prevention field that provides verifiable information about how many 
trespass deaths are accidental versus intentional. Therefore, there are 
no verifiable measures of the extent of rail-related suicides in this 
country. While railroad companies must report trespass incidents 
resulting in serious injury or death to the U.S. Federal Railroad 
Administration (FRA), injuries or deaths that are ruled by a medical 
examiner or coroner to be intentional are not reported. Preliminary 
figures from 2006 indicate there were approximately 500 deaths and 360 
injuries reported to FRA--an increase of 100 incidents over the 
previous year--but suicides are not represented in these numbers. 
Unverifiable estimates from a number of sources range from 150 to more 
than 300 suicides per year on the U.S. railways. Like any other 
incident on the rail system, a suicide on the tracks results in 
equipment and facility damage, delays to train schedules, and trauma to 
railroad personnel involved in the incidents. As a result, FRA last 
year awarded a grant for the first phase of a five-year project to 
reduce suicides on the rail system to the Railroad Research Foundation 
(part of the Association of American Railroads) and its subcontractor, 
the American Association of Suicidology (AAS). In the course of the 
five-year project, the research project's goals include: (i) A 
prevalence assessment to determine verifiable numbers of suicides on 
the rail system; (ii) Development of a standardized reporting tool for 
industry use; (iii) A causal analysis and root cause analysis of 
suicide incidents that occur during the grant cycle; and (iv) Design 
and implementation of suicide prevention measures for the nation's rail 
system to reduce suicide injuries and deaths. AAS is also receiving a 
grant from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to study suicides 
on commuter rail lines throughout the country. Consequently, AAS has 
expanded its study to include commuter lines as well, and will be using 
the same collection instruments once they are approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget.
    This collection of information pertains to Phase II of the project, 
the causal analysis. In order to understand as much as possible about 
people who intend to die by placing themselves in the path of a train 
and, therefore, to design prevention strategies, AAS intends to conduct 
70 psychological autopsies over the course of two years on people who 
die by rail-related suicide. Psychological autopsy is a recognized and 
accepted method for obtaining information about physical, emotional, 
and circumstantial contributors to a person's death. The 70 
psychological autopsies proposed for the FRA and FTA projects will 
involve interviews with witnesses to these incidents--rail and commuter 
personnel and members of the public--as well as family members, 
friends, employers, and co-workers. After conducting a root cause 
analysis of this data, AAS will then work with the industry to design, 
pilot test, and implement effective countermeasures with the goal of 
reducing deaths, injuries, and psychological trauma.
    Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.125A; FRA F 6180.125B.
    Affected Public: Railroad Personnel, Members of the Public, 
Affected Family and Friends.
    Respondent Universe: 210 Railroad Personnel/Members of the Public/
Affected Family and Friends.
    Frequency of Submission: On occasion.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 60 hours.
    Status: Regular Review.
    Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR Sec. Sec.  1320.5(b), 
1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  3501-3520.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 31, 2007.
D.J. Stadtler,
Director, Office of Budget, Federal Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-1826 Filed 2-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.