Direct Single Family Housing Loans and Grants, 5153-5157 [E7-1817]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
compensation must submit an amount
equal to the uncollected employee
contributions and any applicable agency
contributions to OPM for deposit in the
Employees Health Benefits Fund.
(2) The agency must make the deposit
to OPM as soon as possible, but no later
than 60 calendar days after it
determines the amount of an underdeduction that has occurred, regardless
of whether or when the agency recovers
the under-deduction. A subsequent
agency decision on whether to waive
collection of the overpayment of pay
caused by failure to properly withhold
employee health benefits contributions
will be made under 5 U.S.C. 5584 as
implemented by 4 CFR chapter I,
subchapter G, unless the agency
involved is excluded from 5 U.S.C.
5584, in which case any applicable
authority to waive the collection may be
used.
(d) Direct premium payments for
annuitants. (1) If an annuity, excluding
an annuity under subchapter III of
chapter 84 (Thrift Savings Plan), is too
low to cover the health benefits
premium, or if a surviving spouse
receives a basic employee death benefit,
the retirement system must provide
written information to the annuitant or
surviving spouse. The information must
describe the health benefits plans
available, and include the opportunity
to either:
(i) Enroll in a health benefits plan in
which the enrollee’s share of the
premium is less than the annuity
amount; or
(ii) Pay the premium directly to the
retirement system.
(2) The retirement system must accept
direct payment for health benefits
premiums in these circumstances. The
annuitant or surviving spouse must
continue direct payment of the premium
even if the annuity increases to the
extent that it covers the premium.
(3) The annuitant or surviving spouse
must pay the retirement system his or
her share of the premium for the
enrollment for every pay period during
which the enrollment continues, except
for the 31-day temporary extension of
coverage. The individual must make the
payment after each pay period in which
he or she is covered using a schedule set
up by the retirement system. If the
retirement system does not receive
payment by the due date, it must notify
the individual in writing that continued
coverage depends upon payment being
made within 15 days (45 days for
annuitants or surviving spouses residing
overseas) after the notice is received. If
no subsequent payments are made, the
retirement system terminates the
enrollment 60 days after the date of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
notice (90 days for annuitants or
surviving spouses residing overseas). An
annuitant or surviving spouse whose
enrollment terminated due to
nonpayment of premium may not
reenroll or reinstate coverage unless
there are circumstances beyond his or
her control as provided in paragraph
(d)(4) of this section.
(4) If the annuitant or surviving
spouse is prevented by circumstances
beyond his or her control from paying
the premium within 15 days after
receiving the notice, he or she may ask
the retirement system to reinstate the
enrollment by writing the retirement
system. The individual must describe
the circumstances and send the request
within 30 calendar days from the
termination date. The retirement system
will determine if the annuitant or
surviving spouse is eligible for
reinstatement of coverage. When the
determination is affirmative, the
retirement system will reinstate the
coverage retroactive to the date of
termination. If the determination is
negative, then the individual may
request a review of the decision from
the retirement system, as described in
§ 890.104.
(5) Termination of enrollment for
failure to pay premiums within the time
frame described in paragraph (d)(3) of
this section is retroactive to the end of
the last pay period for which payment
was timely received.
(6) The retirement system will submit
all direct premium payments along with
its regular health benefits premiums to
OPM according to procedures
established by OPM.
(e) Procedures for direct payment of
premiums during LWOP after 365 days.
(1) An employee who is granted leave
without pay (LWOP) under subpart L of
part 630 of this chapter (Family and
Medical Leave) after 365 days of
continued coverage under § 890.303(e)
must pay the employee contributions
directly to the employing office and
keep payments current.
(2) The employee must make
payments after the pay period in which
the employee is covered according to a
schedule set up by the employing office.
If the employing office does not receive
the payment by the date due, it must
notify the employee in writing that
continued coverage depends upon
payment being made within 15 days (45
days for employees residing overseas)
after the notice is received. If no
subsequent payments are made, the
employing office terminates the
enrollment 60 days after the date of the
notice (90 days for enrollees residing
overseas).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5153
(3) If the enrollee was prevented by
circumstances beyond his or her control
from making payment within the
timeframe in paragraph (e)(2) of this
section, he or she may ask the
employing office to reinstate the
enrollment by writing to the employing
office. The employee must file the
request within 30 calendar days from
the date of termination and must
include supporting documentation.
(4) The employing office determines
whether the employee is eligible for
reinstatement of coverage. When the
determination is affirmative, the
employing office will reinstate the
coverage of the employee retroactive to
the date of termination. If the
determination is negative, the employee
may request the employing agency to
review the decision as provided under
§ 890.104.
(5) An employee whose coverage is
terminated under paragraph (e)(2) of
this section may enroll if he or she
returns to duty in a pay status in a
position in which the employee is
eligible for coverage under this part.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–1754 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6329–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 3550
RIN 0575–AC54
Direct Single Family Housing Loans
and Grants
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Through this action, the Rural
Housing Service (RHS) is adopting
homeownership education
requirements. The lack of
homeownership education is a wellknown barrier to successful
homeownership for many families. The
intended effect of this action is to assure
that first time homeowners financed
under the Section 502 Direct program
are well prepared for homeownership
by assuring that they receive
homeownership education.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 7,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet L. Carter, Senior Loan Specialist,
Rural Housing Service, Stop 0783, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0783,
Telephone: 202–720–1489; e-mail:
Janet.Carter@wdc.usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
5154
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This rule has been determined to be
not significant and was not reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction of 1995, the information
collection requirements contained in
this regulation have been approved by
OMB under control number 0575–0172.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Agency is committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of Internet and other
information technologies to provided
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. In accordance with that
Executive Order: (1) All State and local
laws and regulations that are in conflict
with this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
in accordance with the regulations of
the National Appeals Division of USDA
at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted
before bringing suit in court challenging
action taken under this rule unless those
regulations specifically allow bringing
suit at an earlier time.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
2 U.S.C. 1532, RHS generally must
prepare a written statement, including a
cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and
final rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that
may result in expenditures to State,
local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
When such a statement is needed for a
rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires RHS to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the least costly,
more cost-effective or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. This rule contains no
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local and tribal Governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this rule is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Programs Affected
The programs affected by this
proposed rule are 10.410, Low to
Moderate Income Housing Loans and
10.417, Very Low-Income Housing
Repair Loans and Grants.
Intergovernmental Consultation
For the reasons set forth in the final
rule related Notice to 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V, these programs are not
subject to Executive Order 12372 which
requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’ It
is the determination of RHS that this
action does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment, and
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
Public Law 91–190, an Environmental
Impact Statement is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with
regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). The undersigned has
determined and certified by signature of
this document that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule imposes a new requirement on
Agency applicants and borrowers;
however, the new requirement of
homeownership education will apply
solely to the individual applicants and
borrowers of Section 502 Direct Single
Family Housing financing, not to small
entities. There will be no significant
information collection, or regulatory
requirements imposed on small entities
under this proposed rule.
Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
National government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this rule
impose a substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments.
Therefore, consultation with the States
is not required.
Background
On March 6, 2006 the Agency
published a proposed rule (71 FR
11167–9) with a 60 day comment period
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that would add homeowner education
as a requirement for first time
homebuyers that use Section 502 Direct
loan funds to purchase a home. We
received a total of 52 comments in
response to the proposed rule. Overall
the comments expressed support for the
addition of the homeownership
education requirement and generally
agreed that homeowner education was
necessary and beneficial. Many
comments did have a recommendation
or suggest a revision to the proposed
rule. The comments are highlighted into
significant issue areas and discussed
below.
A. Homeowner Education as a
Requirement Will Be a Barrier for LowIncome Families and Should Not Be
Mandatory
The Agency received 5 comments
stating that mandating homeowner
education would create a barrier for
families to access Section 502 loans for
home purchase. The comments
suggested the following as possible
barriers for families:
• Availability of homeowner
education classes;
• Perception of an additional
requirement that could discourage
applicants, realtors and sellers from
participating in the program,
• The travel time, distance and cost to
the applicant(s), and
• Lack of certified counselors in some
areas.
The Agency does not believe that
these are insurmountable barriers. In
fact, based on the overall comments
received, the Agency has determined
that the general consensus is that
making homeowner education a
requirement results in greater benefit to
the borrowers than any perceived
detrimental effect to the home buying
process. While the agency has
established some preferences under
§ 3550.11 for formats in training based
on their effectiveness, adequate
flexibility has been included to address
the possible barriers raised.
In addition, although the Agency does
not expect the exception provision to be
liberally used, it will be available. The
State Director may grant an exception to
borrowers on a case-by-case basis where
the applicant documents a special need,
such as a disability, that would impede
completing the homeownership course,
or where homeownership education is
not reasonably available in the local
area as further discussed below.
Therefore, these comments have not
been adopted.
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
B. Waiver of Homeowner Education by
State Directors Should Not Be Routinely
Exercised—RD Should Use Its Resources
To Have Homeowner Education
Services Delivered in Underserved Areas
The Agency received 9 comments
indicating that the waiver provision
should not be routinely exercised, and
3 comments indicating the waiver
provision was needed but that flexibility
should be built into the rule in
exercising the waiver. The State/Local
RD office will do an area by area
assessment of the availability of
homeowner education in the following
forms, before requesting an exception
for an individual from the State
Director: Classroom, one-on-one
counseling, interactive video
conference, interactive home-study,
interactive telephone counseling, and
on-line counseling. Exception requests
will be reviewed and granted on an
individual case-by-case basis. The State
Director will consider whether access to
such homeownership counseling is
‘‘reasonably available’’ before granting
an exception to the homeowner
education requirement to an individual.
Factors that will be taken into
consideration regarding availability of
homeowner education to borrowers in
areas served by field offices include, but
are not limited to: Distance, travel time,
geographic obstacles and cost. The
intent of the exception provision is to
ensure that the homeowner education
requirement is not a barrier to an
applicant in securing a loan; however, it
is not the intent of the Agency to have
liberal use of the exception provision.
The exception provision is intended to
be used only in those rare instances
where it is demonstrated that a borrower
would not be able to access any form of
homeowner education without undue
hardship[m1].
C. Readily Available Counseling Should
Be Defined
The Agency received 1 comment
stating that readily available counseling
should be defined in the rule. Informal
investigation indicated that in some
states applicants traveled up to one hour
to attend a homeowner education class,
after work and on the weekends, if
necessary. Other comments were
received that indicated an applicant
would have to travel to another county
to receive counseling. Distances vary
from state to state and the willingness
of an applicant to attend a class will
vary. Given the many differences from
state to state, what is ‘‘ readily
available’’ in this rule is better
addressed by the State Director during
the assessment of available homeowner
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
education resources in the respective
States. Factors that will be taken into
consideration regarding availability of
homeowner education to borrowers in
areas served by field offices include, but
are not limited to: distance, travel time,
geographic obstacles and cost.
D. Lack of funds to pay for
homeownership education training/who
will pay for the homeowner education if
the borrower cannot afford it?
The Agency received 7 comments
regarding sources of funds to pay for
homeowner education on behalf of verylow and low-income borrowers. Some
commenters believe that the Agency
should assist in paying for the required
homeowner education. This issue will
be addressed, in part, by the RD State
Offices when they assess the availability
of homeowner education throughout
their respective states and compile, an
annually updated resource list of
certified organizations and trainers that
provide homeowner education. Where
there is a fee charged to the borrower for
homeowner education, the States will
also assess sources of funding for the
borrower to pay for their homeowner
education, for example, organizations
that provide free homeowner education
will be identified, and borrowers will be
referred to the free training first in all
states. The Agency research revealed
that many organizations charge only a
nominal fee to cover the cost of
materials for homeowner education. If
qualified, these providers will be
identified, and borrowers will be
referred to these classes if free classes
are unavailable. In addition, the
borrower will have the option of
financing reasonable costs of the
training, as determined by the State
Director, by including the amount in the
loan amount at loan closing. Inclusion
of such costs will not substantially
increase the monthly Section 502
borrower loan payments.
The Agency believes that the overall
benefit of homeownership education
outweighs the burdens involved. The
cost of homeowner education will be
another allowed expense that can be
added to the cost of home purchase, if
requested.
E. What is a reasonable fee to charge?
Who decides?
The Agency received 10 comments
regarding reasonable fees to charge for
homeowner education and suggesting
that the Agency to set parameters for
homeownership education fees as a
guideline for the RD State Directors. RD
does not believe it is appropriate to set
or regulate the appropriate fee for
providers. This should be determined
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5155
based on local market conditions. Based
on the comments received, the Agency
will allow the State Directors to
determine what is a reasonable fee to be
charged for homeowner education based
on the results of statewide assessments
within their respective states. The
Agency anticipates fees charged to
borrowers based on the comments
received to range from free to $400.
F. Homeowner Education Training Fees
Should Be Allowed to the Homebuyer in
Excess of the Appraised Amount of the
House
The Agency received 3 comments
indicating that the fee for homeowner
education counseling should be allowed
in the loan amount in excess of the
appraised value of the house. In
response, the Agency will allow
reasonable homeowner education fees to
be added to the loan amount in excess
of the appraised value of the house and
area loan limits under § 3550.63 in cases
where the borrower requests to pay for
the cost of the homeowner education by
adding it to the loan amount. The
Agency anticipates that such amounts
will be insignificant portions of the
loan.
G. Should RD staff deliver the
homeowner education?
The Agency received 4 comments
stating that RD staff should deliver the
homeowner education training. Staff
capacity and, qualification to deliver
training vary from state to state. State
Directors have the flexibility within
their States to determine the feasibility
of offering this training using staff
resources given other program demands.
RD staff would have to be trained and
certified to provide homeowner
education as required under this rule.
H. Certification of Counselors: Should
Include Certification From State
Housing Finance Authorities or Other
State Level Certification and Should
Include Certification of Training That Is
Culturally Appropriate for Native
American Communities
The Agency received 18 comments
stating that certification of housing
counselors should be allowed on the
state-level, either by the State Housing
Financing Agencies or other state-level
certification processes, 4 comments
stating the certification should model
the HUD standard or one of the national
organizations referenced in the
proposed rule, and 1 commenting
regarding certification of culturally
appropriate training for Native
American communities, especially
Native Americans that reside on rural
reservations. The Agency agrees that
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
5156
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
state-level certification and certification
of culturally appropriate training for
Native Americans should be included. It
is addressed in the final rule by
§ 3550.11 permitting state-level
certification by the State Housing
Finance Agency or other state-level
certification approved by the State
Director, and certification by the
National American Indian Housing
Council, provided the required topics
are included in their curriculum. The
State Director will confirm that the
housing counseling agencies that are not
certified by a national agency identified
in the final rule are certified by an
approved state agency during the RD
State Office assessment of available
certified housing counseling agencies in
their respective states.
I. What process should applicants
undergo to receive a certificate of
completion?
The Agency received 4 comments
regarding the requirement for the
borrower to have a certificate of
completion or letter of completion from
the housing counseling provider to
document that the course was
successfully completed. The main
concern of these comments was that
there should not be a testing component
in order for the provider to issue a letter
or certificate of completion to the
participants. Since the language in the
proposed rule lets the provider
determine successful completion of
their course, the Agency has determined
that there is sufficient flexibility for
each provider to make an appropriate
individual assessment and; therefore,
the language will remain the same in the
final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
J. At what point during the home
purchase process should the
Homeowner Education be required?
The Agency received 8 comments
regarding when during the home
purchase process should the borrower
complete homeowner education.
Homeowner education must be
completed by the borrower prior to
closing their loan. When the borrowers
receive their certificate of eligibility for
a loan they will be advised that by
accepting the certificate of eligibility
they agree to submit documentation of
homeowner education completion
before loan closing and that they
understand that it is a condition of loan
closing. Language to this effect will be
added to the Agency’s certificate of
eligibility document. At that time, the
Agency will provide referrals to
certified housing counselors to the
borrower and discuss with the borrower
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
where and when they will complete the
homeowner education class.
Generally, the comments stated that
the earlier in the process the
homeownership education is taken the
greater it would benefit the borrower. It
would be ideal if the borrowers would
complete an homeowner education
course before submitting a loan
application and certainly before signing
a purchase and sale agreement;
however, realistically, as some
comments indicated this may not be
practicable in all cases. Many borrowers
are unlikely to incur the expense of
taking a homeowner education course if
they have no confidence that they will
be approved for a loan to buy a house.
In recognition of these realities, the
Agency also will offer some flexibility to
providers in tailoring the curriculum to
the attendee. For example, when the
attendee has already located a dwelling
to purchase, they need not be required
to take that portion of the training
dealing with shopping for a home. The
provider could determine that the
applicant already has satisfactory
knowledge in this area.
K. Will the requirement be the same for
Self-Help families who apply for Section
502 Direct loans?
The Agency received 2 comments
regarding whether Self-Help families
would have to comply with the
homeowner education requirement. If
the Self-Help families are applying for
Section 502 loans, then this rule
requiring homeowner education as set
forth would apply.
L. Suggestions for Adding Educational
Components to Homeowner Education
Course
The Agency received 8 comments
regarding additional topics that should
be included in the required homeowner
education. The Agency recognizes the
value of these additional topics,
therefore, the final rule will add them as
recommended: Budgeting—Pre-& PostPurchase; Credit Counseling; Lender
Differences—especially predatory
lending; and Post-Occupancy Education
to include delinquency and foreclosure
prevention.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3550
Administrative practice and
procedure, Conflict of interests,
Environmental impact statements, Equal
credit opportunity, Fair housing,
Accounting, Housing, Loan programs—
Housing and community development,
Low and moderate income housing,
Manufactured homes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rural
areas, Subsidies.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
chapter XXXV, Title 7 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended as
follows:
I
PART 3550—DIRECT SINGLE FAMILY
HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS
1. The authority citation for part 3550
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart A—General
2. Section 3550.11 is added to read as
follows:
I
§ 3550.11 State Director assessment of
homeowner education.
(a) State Director’s will make an
assessment of the availability of
certified homeowner education in their
respective states and maintain an
annually updated listing of providers
and their reasonable costs.
(b) The order of preference for
homeowner education formats is as
follows:
(1) Classroom; one-on-one counseling;
or interactive video conference.
(2) If none of the formats in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section is reasonably
available; as determined under
§ 3550.53(i), then the applicant may use
interactive home-study or interactive
telephone counseling of at least four
hours duration.
(3) If none of the formats in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this
section is reasonably available as
determined under § 3550.53(i), then the
applicant may use on-line counseling to
meet the homeownership education
requirement.
(c) Homeownership education must
include a letter or certificate of
completion and be provided by
homeownership education counselors
that are certified by any of the
following:
(1) The Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD);
(2) NeighborWorks America (NWA);
(3) The National Federation of
Housing Counselors (NFHC);
(4) National American Indian Housing
Council (NAIHC); or
(5) The State Housing Finance Agency
or other qualified organization approved
by the State Director.
(d) The provider will issue a letter or
certificate of completion to document
that the borrower has satisfactory
knowledge of these minimum topics:
(1) Preparing for homeownership
(evaluate readiness to go from rental to
homeownership),
(2) Budgeting (pre and post-purchase),
(3) Credit counseling,
(4) Shopping for a home,
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(5) Lender differences (predatory
lending),
(6) Obtaining a mortgage (mortgage
process, different types of mortgages),
(7) Loan closing (closing process,
documentation, closing costs),
(8) Post-occupancy counseling
(delinquency and foreclosure
prevention),
(9) Life as a homeowner (homeowner
warranties, maintenance and repairs),
(e) The provider may tailor the
homeownership education training to
the needs of the borrower to ensure
satisfactory knowledge of the topics
listed in paragraph (d) of this section.
would unduly impede completing a
homeownership course in a reasonably
available format.
Dated: January 5, 2007.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. E7–1817 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Subpart B—Section 502 Origination
[Docket No. 2003–NM–123–AD; Amendment
39–14920; AD 2007–03–09]
3. Section 3550.52 (d)(10) is added to
read as follows:
RIN 2120–AA64
I
§ 3550.52
Loan purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(10) Reasonable fees for
homeownership education as
determined by the State Director under
§ 3550.11 of this subpart. Such fees may
be added to the loan amount in excess
of the area loan limit and appraised
value of the house.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. Section 3550.53(i) is added to read
as follows:
§ 3550.53
Eligibility requirements.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Homeownership education.
Applicants who are first-time
homebuyers must agree to provide
documentation, in the form of a
completion certificate or letter from the
provider, that a homeownership
education course from a certified
provider under § 3550.11 has been
successfully completed as defined by
the provider prior to loan closing.
Requests for exceptions to the
homeowner education requirement will
be reviewed and granted on an
individual case-by-case basis. The State
Director may grant an exception the
homeownership education requirement
for individuals in geographic areas
within the State where the State
Director verifies that certified
homeownership education is not
reasonably available in the local area in
any of the formats listed in § 3550.11(b).
Whether such homeownership
education is reasonably available will be
determined based on factors including,
but not limited to: Distance, travel time,
geographic obstacles, and cost. On a
case-by-case basis, the State Director
also may grant an exception, provided
the applicant borrower documents a
special need, such as a disability, that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 Airplanes; Model A300 B4–601,
B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R,
B4–622R, F4–605R, F4–622R, and C4–
605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively
Called A300–600 Series Airplanes);
and Model A310 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a
new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all of the airplanes
identified above, that requires revising
the FAA-approved maintenance
program to include a new airplane
maintenance manual task that specifies
a detailed inspection after each ram air
turbine (RAT) retraction. This AD also
requires, for certain airplanes, a onetime inspection to detect breaks in the
bottom flange fitting of the RAT and
corrective actions, if necessary; for
certain airplanes, an adjustment of the
ejection jack; and, for certain other
airplanes, replacement of the aluminum
part with an improved steel part. The
actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent failure of the RAT
yoke fitting, which could result in the
loss of RAT function and possible loss
of critical flight control in the event of
certain emergency situations. This
action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective March 12, 2007.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of March 12,
2007.
ADDRESSES: The service information
referenced in this AD may be obtained
from Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
This information may be examined at
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5157
the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate,
Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2797;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an airworthiness directive (AD)
that is applicable to Airbus Model A300
airplanes; Model A300 B4–601, B4–603,
B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–622R,
F4–605R, F4–622R, and C4–605R
Variant F series airplanes (collectively
called A300–600 series airplanes); and
Model A310 airplanes was published as
a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register on May 9, 2006 (71 FR 26884).
That action proposed to require revising
the FAA-approved maintenance
program to include a new airplane
maintenance manual task that specifies
a detailed inspection after each ram air
turbine (RAT) extension. That action
also proposed to require a one-time
inspection to detect breaks in the
bottom flange fitting of the RAT and
corrective actions, if necessary; for
certain airplanes, an adjustment of the
ejection jack; and, for certain other
airplanes, replacement of the aluminum
part with an improved steel part.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded
an opportunity to participate in the
making of this amendment. Due
consideration has been given to the
comments received.
Request To Remove Airplanes From
Requirement To Do Detailed Inspection
Airbus requests that we remove
Model A300 airplanes from the
‘‘effectivity’’ of paragraph (a) of the
supplemental NPRM, which specifies a
detailed inspection for breaks of the
bottom flange fitting of the yoke fitting
for the RAT swivel coupling, and
replacement if necessary. Airbus states
that all Model A300-B2 and -B4
airplanes are equipped with Dowty
RATs that have swivel coupling yoke
fittings. The Dowty fittings are to be
replaced in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–57–0244, dated
March 4, 2005. That action is specified
in paragraph (b) of the Supplemental
NPRM. Airbus states that the FAA
should specify that these airplanes are
to use the up-to-date requirements of
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 23 (Monday, February 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5153-5157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1817]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 3550
RIN 0575-AC54
Direct Single Family Housing Loans and Grants
AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Through this action, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) is
adopting homeownership education requirements. The lack of
homeownership education is a well-known barrier to successful
homeownership for many families. The intended effect of this action is
to assure that first time homeowners financed under the Section 502
Direct program are well prepared for homeownership by assuring that
they receive homeownership education.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 7, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet L. Carter, Senior Loan
Specialist, Rural Housing Service, Stop 0783, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250-0783, Telephone: 202-720-1489; e-mail:
Janet.Carter@wdc.usda.gov.
[[Page 5154]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This rule has been determined to be not significant and was not
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive
Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction of 1995, the information
collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved
by OMB under control number 0575-0172.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Agency is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of Internet and other information technologies to
provided increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. In accordance with that Executive Order: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are in conflict with this rule will
be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and
(3) administrative proceedings in accordance with the regulations of
the National Appeals Division of USDA at 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before bringing suit in court challenging action taken under
this rule unless those regulations specifically allow bringing suit at
an earlier time.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, 2
U.S.C. 1532, RHS generally must prepare a written statement, including
a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a
rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires RHS to identify and
consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, more cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objectives of the rule. This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local and tribal Governments or the private sector. Therefore,
this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
Programs Affected
The programs affected by this proposed rule are 10.410, Low to
Moderate Income Housing Loans and 10.417, Very Low-Income Housing
Repair Loans and Grants.
Intergovernmental Consultation
For the reasons set forth in the final rule related Notice to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, these programs are not subject to Executive Order
12372 which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' It is the determination of RHS
that this action does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, and in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public
Law 91-190, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). The undersigned has
determined and certified by signature of this document that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule imposes a new requirement on Agency
applicants and borrowers; however, the new requirement of homeownership
education will apply solely to the individual applicants and borrowers
of Section 502 Direct Single Family Housing financing, not to small
entities. There will be no significant information collection, or
regulatory requirements imposed on small entities under this proposed
rule.
Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the National
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
rule impose a substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not required.
Background
On March 6, 2006 the Agency published a proposed rule (71 FR 11167-
9) with a 60 day comment period that would add homeowner education as a
requirement for first time homebuyers that use Section 502 Direct loan
funds to purchase a home. We received a total of 52 comments in
response to the proposed rule. Overall the comments expressed support
for the addition of the homeownership education requirement and
generally agreed that homeowner education was necessary and beneficial.
Many comments did have a recommendation or suggest a revision to the
proposed rule. The comments are highlighted into significant issue
areas and discussed below.
A. Homeowner Education as a Requirement Will Be a Barrier for Low-
Income Families and Should Not Be Mandatory
The Agency received 5 comments stating that mandating homeowner
education would create a barrier for families to access Section 502
loans for home purchase. The comments suggested the following as
possible barriers for families:
Availability of homeowner education classes;
Perception of an additional requirement that could
discourage applicants, realtors and sellers from participating in the
program,
The travel time, distance and cost to the applicant(s),
and
Lack of certified counselors in some areas.
The Agency does not believe that these are insurmountable barriers.
In fact, based on the overall comments received, the Agency has
determined that the general consensus is that making homeowner
education a requirement results in greater benefit to the borrowers
than any perceived detrimental effect to the home buying process. While
the agency has established some preferences under Sec. 3550.11 for
formats in training based on their effectiveness, adequate flexibility
has been included to address the possible barriers raised.
In addition, although the Agency does not expect the exception
provision to be liberally used, it will be available. The State
Director may grant an exception to borrowers on a case-by-case basis
where the applicant documents a special need, such as a disability,
that would impede completing the homeownership course, or where
homeownership education is not reasonably available in the local area
as further discussed below. Therefore, these comments have not been
adopted.
[[Page 5155]]
B. Waiver of Homeowner Education by State Directors Should Not Be
Routinely Exercised--RD Should Use Its Resources To Have Homeowner
Education Services Delivered in Underserved Areas
The Agency received 9 comments indicating that the waiver provision
should not be routinely exercised, and 3 comments indicating the waiver
provision was needed but that flexibility should be built into the rule
in exercising the waiver. The State/Local RD office will do an area by
area assessment of the availability of homeowner education in the
following forms, before requesting an exception for an individual from
the State Director: Classroom, one-on-one counseling, interactive video
conference, interactive home-study, interactive telephone counseling,
and on-line counseling. Exception requests will be reviewed and granted
on an individual case-by-case basis. The State Director will consider
whether access to such homeownership counseling is ``reasonably
available'' before granting an exception to the homeowner education
requirement to an individual. Factors that will be taken into
consideration regarding availability of homeowner education to
borrowers in areas served by field offices include, but are not limited
to: Distance, travel time, geographic obstacles and cost. The intent of
the exception provision is to ensure that the homeowner education
requirement is not a barrier to an applicant in securing a loan;
however, it is not the intent of the Agency to have liberal use of the
exception provision. The exception provision is intended to be used
only in those rare instances where it is demonstrated that a borrower
would not be able to access any form of homeowner education without
undue hardship[m1].
C. Readily Available Counseling Should Be Defined
The Agency received 1 comment stating that readily available
counseling should be defined in the rule. Informal investigation
indicated that in some states applicants traveled up to one hour to
attend a homeowner education class, after work and on the weekends, if
necessary. Other comments were received that indicated an applicant
would have to travel to another county to receive counseling. Distances
vary from state to state and the willingness of an applicant to attend
a class will vary. Given the many differences from state to state, what
is `` readily available'' in this rule is better addressed by the State
Director during the assessment of available homeowner education
resources in the respective States. Factors that will be taken into
consideration regarding availability of homeowner education to
borrowers in areas served by field offices include, but are not limited
to: distance, travel time, geographic obstacles and cost.
D. Lack of funds to pay for homeownership education training/who will
pay for the homeowner education if the borrower cannot afford it?
The Agency received 7 comments regarding sources of funds to pay
for homeowner education on behalf of very-low and low-income borrowers.
Some commenters believe that the Agency should assist in paying for the
required homeowner education. This issue will be addressed, in part, by
the RD State Offices when they assess the availability of homeowner
education throughout their respective states and compile, an annually
updated resource list of certified organizations and trainers that
provide homeowner education. Where there is a fee charged to the
borrower for homeowner education, the States will also assess sources
of funding for the borrower to pay for their homeowner education, for
example, organizations that provide free homeowner education will be
identified, and borrowers will be referred to the free training first
in all states. The Agency research revealed that many organizations
charge only a nominal fee to cover the cost of materials for homeowner
education. If qualified, these providers will be identified, and
borrowers will be referred to these classes if free classes are
unavailable. In addition, the borrower will have the option of
financing reasonable costs of the training, as determined by the State
Director, by including the amount in the loan amount at loan closing.
Inclusion of such costs will not substantially increase the monthly
Section 502 borrower loan payments.
The Agency believes that the overall benefit of homeownership
education outweighs the burdens involved. The cost of homeowner
education will be another allowed expense that can be added to the cost
of home purchase, if requested.
E. What is a reasonable fee to charge? Who decides?
The Agency received 10 comments regarding reasonable fees to charge
for homeowner education and suggesting that the Agency to set
parameters for homeownership education fees as a guideline for the RD
State Directors. RD does not believe it is appropriate to set or
regulate the appropriate fee for providers. This should be determined
based on local market conditions. Based on the comments received, the
Agency will allow the State Directors to determine what is a reasonable
fee to be charged for homeowner education based on the results of
statewide assessments within their respective states. The Agency
anticipates fees charged to borrowers based on the comments received to
range from free to $400.
F. Homeowner Education Training Fees Should Be Allowed to the Homebuyer
in Excess of the Appraised Amount of the House
The Agency received 3 comments indicating that the fee for
homeowner education counseling should be allowed in the loan amount in
excess of the appraised value of the house. In response, the Agency
will allow reasonable homeowner education fees to be added to the loan
amount in excess of the appraised value of the house and area loan
limits under Sec. 3550.63 in cases where the borrower requests to pay
for the cost of the homeowner education by adding it to the loan
amount. The Agency anticipates that such amounts will be insignificant
portions of the loan.
G. Should RD staff deliver the homeowner education?
The Agency received 4 comments stating that RD staff should deliver
the homeowner education training. Staff capacity and, qualification to
deliver training vary from state to state. State Directors have the
flexibility within their States to determine the feasibility of
offering this training using staff resources given other program
demands. RD staff would have to be trained and certified to provide
homeowner education as required under this rule.
H. Certification of Counselors: Should Include Certification From State
Housing Finance Authorities or Other State Level Certification and
Should Include Certification of Training That Is Culturally Appropriate
for Native American Communities
The Agency received 18 comments stating that certification of
housing counselors should be allowed on the state-level, either by the
State Housing Financing Agencies or other state-level certification
processes, 4 comments stating the certification should model the HUD
standard or one of the national organizations referenced in the
proposed rule, and 1 commenting regarding certification of culturally
appropriate training for Native American communities, especially Native
Americans that reside on rural reservations. The Agency agrees that
[[Page 5156]]
state-level certification and certification of culturally appropriate
training for Native Americans should be included. It is addressed in
the final rule by Sec. 3550.11 permitting state-level certification by
the State Housing Finance Agency or other state-level certification
approved by the State Director, and certification by the National
American Indian Housing Council, provided the required topics are
included in their curriculum. The State Director will confirm that the
housing counseling agencies that are not certified by a national agency
identified in the final rule are certified by an approved state agency
during the RD State Office assessment of available certified housing
counseling agencies in their respective states.
I. What process should applicants undergo to receive a certificate of
completion?
The Agency received 4 comments regarding the requirement for the
borrower to have a certificate of completion or letter of completion
from the housing counseling provider to document that the course was
successfully completed. The main concern of these comments was that
there should not be a testing component in order for the provider to
issue a letter or certificate of completion to the participants. Since
the language in the proposed rule lets the provider determine
successful completion of their course, the Agency has determined that
there is sufficient flexibility for each provider to make an
appropriate individual assessment and; therefore, the language will
remain the same in the final rule.
J. At what point during the home purchase process should the Homeowner
Education be required?
The Agency received 8 comments regarding when during the home
purchase process should the borrower complete homeowner education.
Homeowner education must be completed by the borrower prior to closing
their loan. When the borrowers receive their certificate of eligibility
for a loan they will be advised that by accepting the certificate of
eligibility they agree to submit documentation of homeowner education
completion before loan closing and that they understand that it is a
condition of loan closing. Language to this effect will be added to the
Agency's certificate of eligibility document. At that time, the Agency
will provide referrals to certified housing counselors to the borrower
and discuss with the borrower where and when they will complete the
homeowner education class.
Generally, the comments stated that the earlier in the process the
homeownership education is taken the greater it would benefit the
borrower. It would be ideal if the borrowers would complete an
homeowner education course before submitting a loan application and
certainly before signing a purchase and sale agreement; however,
realistically, as some comments indicated this may not be practicable
in all cases. Many borrowers are unlikely to incur the expense of
taking a homeowner education course if they have no confidence that
they will be approved for a loan to buy a house. In recognition of
these realities, the Agency also will offer some flexibility to
providers in tailoring the curriculum to the attendee. For example,
when the attendee has already located a dwelling to purchase, they need
not be required to take that portion of the training dealing with
shopping for a home. The provider could determine that the applicant
already has satisfactory knowledge in this area.
K. Will the requirement be the same for Self-Help families who apply
for Section 502 Direct loans?
The Agency received 2 comments regarding whether Self-Help families
would have to comply with the homeowner education requirement. If the
Self-Help families are applying for Section 502 loans, then this rule
requiring homeowner education as set forth would apply.
L. Suggestions for Adding Educational Components to Homeowner Education
Course
The Agency received 8 comments regarding additional topics that
should be included in the required homeowner education. The Agency
recognizes the value of these additional topics, therefore, the final
rule will add them as recommended: Budgeting--Pre-& Post-Purchase;
Credit Counseling; Lender Differences--especially predatory lending;
and Post-Occupancy Education to include delinquency and foreclosure
prevention.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3550
Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests,
Environmental impact statements, Equal credit opportunity, Fair
housing, Accounting, Housing, Loan programs--Housing and community
development, Low and moderate income housing, Manufactured homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rural areas, Subsidies.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, chapter XXXV, Title 7 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows:
PART 3550--DIRECT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3550 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart A--General
0
2. Section 3550.11 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 3550.11 State Director assessment of homeowner education.
(a) State Director's will make an assessment of the availability of
certified homeowner education in their respective states and maintain
an annually updated listing of providers and their reasonable costs.
(b) The order of preference for homeowner education formats is as
follows:
(1) Classroom; one-on-one counseling; or interactive video
conference.
(2) If none of the formats in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is
reasonably available; as determined under Sec. 3550.53(i), then the
applicant may use interactive home-study or interactive telephone
counseling of at least four hours duration.
(3) If none of the formats in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this
section is reasonably available as determined under Sec. 3550.53(i),
then the applicant may use on-line counseling to meet the homeownership
education requirement.
(c) Homeownership education must include a letter or certificate of
completion and be provided by homeownership education counselors that
are certified by any of the following:
(1) The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD);
(2) NeighborWorks America (NWA);
(3) The National Federation of Housing Counselors (NFHC);
(4) National American Indian Housing Council (NAIHC); or
(5) The State Housing Finance Agency or other qualified
organization approved by the State Director.
(d) The provider will issue a letter or certificate of completion
to document that the borrower has satisfactory knowledge of these
minimum topics:
(1) Preparing for homeownership (evaluate readiness to go from
rental to homeownership),
(2) Budgeting (pre and post-purchase),
(3) Credit counseling,
(4) Shopping for a home,
[[Page 5157]]
(5) Lender differences (predatory lending),
(6) Obtaining a mortgage (mortgage process, different types of
mortgages),
(7) Loan closing (closing process, documentation, closing costs),
(8) Post-occupancy counseling (delinquency and foreclosure
prevention),
(9) Life as a homeowner (homeowner warranties, maintenance and
repairs),
(e) The provider may tailor the homeownership education training to
the needs of the borrower to ensure satisfactory knowledge of the
topics listed in paragraph (d) of this section.
Subpart B--Section 502 Origination
0
3. Section 3550.52 (d)(10) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 3550.52 Loan purposes.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(10) Reasonable fees for homeownership education as determined by
the State Director under Sec. 3550.11 of this subpart. Such fees may
be added to the loan amount in excess of the area loan limit and
appraised value of the house.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 3550.53(i) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 3550.53 Eligibility requirements.
* * * * *
(i) Homeownership education. Applicants who are first-time
homebuyers must agree to provide documentation, in the form of a
completion certificate or letter from the provider, that a
homeownership education course from a certified provider under Sec.
3550.11 has been successfully completed as defined by the provider
prior to loan closing. Requests for exceptions to the homeowner
education requirement will be reviewed and granted on an individual
case-by-case basis. The State Director may grant an exception the
homeownership education requirement for individuals in geographic areas
within the State where the State Director verifies that certified
homeownership education is not reasonably available in the local area
in any of the formats listed in Sec. 3550.11(b). Whether such
homeownership education is reasonably available will be determined
based on factors including, but not limited to: Distance, travel time,
geographic obstacles, and cost. On a case-by-case basis, the State
Director also may grant an exception, provided the applicant borrower
documents a special need, such as a disability, that would unduly
impede completing a homeownership course in a reasonably available
format.
Dated: January 5, 2007.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1817 Filed 2-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P