Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes, 5164-5167 [E7-1600]
Download as PDF
5164
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1.—PREVIOUS REVISIONS OF SERVICE BULLETINS—Continued
Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–24–6004
A300–24–6004
A300–24–6004
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6084
A300–28–6056
A310–24–2009
A310–24–2009
A310–24–2009
A310–24–2009
Revision level
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(l)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Date
1 .........................................................
2 .........................................................
03 .......................................................
Original ...............................................
01 .......................................................
02 .......................................................
03 .......................................................
04 .......................................................
05 .......................................................
06 .......................................................
Original ...............................................
Original ...............................................
Original ...............................................
1 .........................................................
2 .........................................................
03 .......................................................
Related Information
(m) European Aviation Safety Agency
airworthiness directive 2006–0074, dated
April 3, 2006, also addresses the subject of
this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use the service information
specified in Table 2 of this AD to perform the
actions that are required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of
the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of these
documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Airbus, 1
January 28, 1988.
February 24, 1995.
June 30, 1998.
December 12, 1994.
February 7, 1995.
May 10, 1995.
January 17, 1996.
March 6, 2001.
August 30, 2001.
October 13, 2005.
March 4, 2005.
February 18, 1998.
May 31, 1985.
January 28, 1988.
February 24, 1995.
June 30, 1998.
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Room PL–401, Nassif Building,
Washington, DC; on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
TABLE 2.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Revision
level
Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–24–0085
A300–24–0100
A300–24–6004
A300–24–6043
A300–24–6084
A300–28–6056
A310–24–2009
A310–24–2091
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
24, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–1602 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
06 .......................................................
Original ...............................................
04 .......................................................
07 .......................................................
01 .......................................................
01 .......................................................
04 .......................................................
Original ...............................................
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26046; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–172–AD; Amendment
39–14922; AD 2007–03–11]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Date
Sfmt 4700
October 13, 2005.
April 7, 2005.
November 15, 2005.
October 11, 2006.
June 28, 2005.
January 20, 2006.
November 15, 2005.
March 4, 2005.
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier Model CL–600–2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This AD requires inspecting
for discrepancies of the activation
mechanism of certain chemical oxygen
generators, and corrective action if
necessary. This AD results from several
incidents, on certain airplane models, of
incorrect installation of the release pin
into the safety pin hole of the activation
mechanism of the chemical oxygen
generator; this resulted in failure to
activate the chemical oxygen generator
when required. A separate incident
occurred on a different airplane model
during deployment of the cabin oxygen
system, which resulted in failure of the
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
release pin to activate the oxygen
generator at a flight attendant station.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the activation mechanism of
the chemical oxygen generator, which
could result in the unavailability of
supplemental oxygen and possible
incapacitation of passengers and cabin
crew during an in-flight decompression.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 12, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of March 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair,
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087,
Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec
H3C 3G9, Canada, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Flight Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA,
New York Aircraft Certification Office,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone
(516) 228–7305; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness
directive (AD) docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov or in person at the
Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to certain Bombardier Model CL–
600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 &
440) airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
October 12, 2006 (71 FR 60083). That
NPRM proposed to require inspecting
for discrepancies of the activation
mechanism of certain chemical oxygen
generators, and corrective action if
necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments received.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
Request To Incorporate by Reference/
Publish Service Information
The Modification and Replacement of
Parts Association (MARPA) states that
frequently ADs are derived from service
information originating with the type
certificate holder or its suppliers.
MARPA also states that manufacturer’s
service documents are privately
authored instruments generally enjoying
copyright protection against duplication
and distribution. MARPA contends that
when a service document is
incorporated by reference pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 into a
public document such as an AD, it loses
its private, protected status and becomes
itself a public document. MARPA
explains that if a service document is
used as a mandatory element of
compliance it should not simply be
referenced, but should be incorporated
into the regulatory document. MARPA
states that public laws by definition
must be public, which means they
cannot rely for compliance upon private
writings, especially when the writings
originate in a foreign country. MARPA
adds that the interpretation of a
document is not a question of fact, but
of law, bound by the figurative four
corners of the document; therefore,
unless the service document is
incorporated by reference, a court of law
will not consider it when interpreting
the AD. MARPA is concerned that
failure to incorporate-by-reference the
relevant service information could
result in a court decision invalidating
the AD.
MARPA advises that it was informed
that service documents are usually not
incorporated into proposed actions
(NPRMs), but only into final actions.
MARPA notes that there is no indication
in the NPRM that the FAA intends to
incorporate by reference the necessary
service information; in addition, there is
no indication of which service
documents are mandatory and which
are merely sources of additional service
information; therefore, the reader is
unsure of the FAA’s intent. MARPA
asks that future proposed actions
indicate the FAA intent by including
the following, or a similar statement:
‘‘We intend to incorporate by reference
the following publications.’’
MARPA also states that incorporation
by reference service documents should
be made available to the public by
publication in the Docket Management
System (DMS) keyed to the action that
incorporates them. MARPA adds that,
under the aforementioned authorities,
incorporation by reference is a
technique used to reduce the size of the
Federal Register when the information
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5165
is already available to the affected
individuals. MARPA notes that,
traditionally, ‘‘affected individuals’’ has
meant aircraft owners and operators
who are generally provided service
information by the manufacturer.
MARPA states that a new class of
affected individuals has emerged since
the majority of aircraft maintenance is
now performed by specialty shops
instead of aircraft owners and operators.
MARPA adds that this new class
includes maintenance and repair
organizations (MRO), component
servicing and repair shops, parts
purveyors and distributors and
organizations manufacturing or
servicing alternatively certified parts
under section 21.303 (‘‘Replacement
and modification parts’’) of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.303).
Further, MARPA notes that the concept
of brevity is now nearly archaic as
documents exist more frequently in
electronic format than on paper.
Therefore, MARPA asks that the service
documents deemed essential to the
accomplishment of the NPRM be
incorporated by reference into the
regulatory instrument, and published in
DMS prior to release of the AD.
We understand MARPA’s comment
concerning incorporation by reference.
The Office of the Federal Register (OFR)
requires that documents that are
necessary to accomplish the
requirements of the AD be incorporated
by reference during the final rule phase
of rulemaking. This final rule
incorporates by reference the documents
necessary for the accomplishment of the
requirements mandated by this AD.
Further, we point out that while
documents that are incorporated by
reference do become public information,
they do not lose their copyright
protection. For that reason, we advise
the public to contact the manufacturer
to obtain copies of the referenced
service information.
The FAA does not concur with the
commenter’s request to indicate in an
NPRM our intent to incorporate service
information by reference. When we
propose that actions be accomplished in
accordance with certain service
information in an NPRM, the public
may assume we intend to IBR that
service information, as requested by the
Office of the Federal Register. Service
information that is cited in the proposed
AD as a source of additional information
is not presented as a requirement, and
the public may assume we do not intend
to IBR that service information. No
change to this final rule is necessary in
regard to the commenter’s request.
In regard to MARPA’s request to post
service bulletins on the Department of
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
5166
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Transportation’s DMS, we are currently
in the process of reviewing issues
surrounding the posting of service
bulletins on the DMS as part of an AD
docket. Once we have thoroughly
examined all aspects of this issue and
have made a final determination, we
will consider whether our current
practice needs to be revised. No change
to the final rule is necessary in response
to this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comments
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
This AD affects about 145 airplanes of
U.S. registry.
The inspection in Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A601R–35–014 takes
about 3 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of this inspection for U.S. operators
is $34,800, or $240 per airplane.
The inspection in Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601R–35–016 takes about 1
work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
this inspection for U.S. operators is
$11,600, or $80 per airplane.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
generator when required. A separate incident
occurred on a different airplane model
during deployment of the cabin oxygen
system, and resulted in failure of the release
pin to activate the oxygen generator at a flight
attendant station. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the activation mechanism
of the chemical oxygen generator, which
could result in the unavailability of
supplemental oxygen and possible
incapacitation of passengers and cabin crew
during an in-flight decompression.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections/Corrective Action
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model
CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A601R–35–014, dated September 25,
2003; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–
35–016, dated September 8, 2005.
(f) Do the detailed inspections for
discrepancies of certain chemical oxygen
generators of each flight attendant and
lavatory oxygen panel, as applicable, and
each passenger service unit of the passenger
oxygen system, as specified in paragraphs
(f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For airplanes identified in paragraph
1.A. of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R–35–014, dated September 25, 2003:
Within 550 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, do a one-time inspection for
correct alignment and engagement of the
release pin with the lanyard tube in the mask
container module of the activation (firing)
mechanism in the chemical oxygen generator
by doing all the actions, including all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R–
35–014, dated September 25, 2003. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further
flight.
(2) For airplanes identified in paragraph
1.A. of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–
35–016, dated September 8, 2005: Within
1,100 flight hours after the effective date of
this AD; do a one-time inspection for correct
installation of the release pin of the
activation mechanism of the chemical oxygen
generator, by doing all the actions, including
all applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
601R–35–016, dated September 8, 2005. Do
all applicable corrective actions before
further flight.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from several incidents,
on certain airplane models, of incorrect
installation of the release pin into the safety
pin hole of the activation mechanism of the
chemical oxygen generator; this resulted in
failure to activate the chemical oxygen
Note 2: Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–
35–016, dated September 8, 2005, refers to B/
E Aerospace Service Bulletin 117003–35–4,
dated March 29, 2001, as an additional
source of service information for
accomplishing the inspection and corrective
action specified in paragraph (f) of this AD.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
I
2007–03–11 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly
Canadair): Amendment 39–14922.
Docket No. FAA–2006–26046;
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–172–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 12,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(h) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
2006–11, dated May 31, 2006, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A601R–35–014, dated September 25,
2003; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–
35–016, dated September 8, 2005; as
applicable; to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of these documents in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair,
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station
Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9,
Canada, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Room PL–401, Nassif Building,
Washington, DC; on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
or go to
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
24, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–1600 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Economic Analysis
15 CFR Part 801
[Docket No. 061005257–7018–02]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
RIN 0691–AA62
International Services Surveys: BE–
185, Quarterly Survey of Financial
Services Transactions Between U.S.
Financial Services Providers and
Foreign Persons
Bureau of Economic Analysis,
Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule amends
regulations of the Bureau of Economic
Analysis, Department of Commerce
(BEA) to set forth the reporting
requirements for the BE–185, Quarterly
Survey of Financial Services
Transactions Between U.S. Financial
Services Providers and Foreign Persons.
This survey replaces a similar but more
limited survey, the BE–85, Quarterly
Survey of Financial Services
Transactions Between U.S. Financial
Services Providers and Unaffiliated
Foreign Persons. A new agency form
number and survey title are being
introduced because the survey program
is being reconfigured to begin collection
of data on transactions with affiliated
foreigners using the same survey
instruments as are used to collect
information on transactions with
unaffiliated foreigners. This change will
allow respondents to report financial
services transactions with foreign
persons on one quarterly survey, rather
than on as many as three different
quarterly surveys. The BE–185 survey
will be conducted quarterly beginning
with the first quarter of 2007.
The BE–185 survey data will be used
to update universe estimates from
similar data reported on the BE–80,
Benchmark Survey of Financial Services
Transactions Between U.S. Financial
Services Providers and Unaffiliated
Foreign Persons and on the benchmark
and quarterly direct investment surveys
that were administered to collect data
on transactions with affiliated foreign
persons.
DATES: This final rule will be effective
March 7, 2007
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Obie
G. Whichard, Chief, International
Investment Division (BE–50), Bureau of
Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; email obie.whichard@bea.gov; or phone
(202) 606–9890.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
November 16, 2006 Federal Register, 71
FR 66706, BEA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking setting forth
reporting requirements for the BE–185,
Quarterly Survey of Financial Services
Transactions Between U.S. Financial
Services Providers and Foreign Persons.
No comments were received on the
proposed rule. Thus, the proposed rule
is adopted without change. This final
rule amends 15 CFR Part 801.9 to
replace the reporting requirements for
the BE–85, Quarterly Survey of
Financial Services Transactions
Between U.S. Financial Services
Providers and Unaffiliated Foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5167
Persons, with requirements for the BE–
185, Quarterly Survey of Financial
Services Transactions Between U.S.
Financial Services Providers and
Foreign Persons.
Description of Changes
The BE–185 survey is a mandatory
survey and will be conducted,
beginning with transactions for the first
quarter of 2007, by BEA under the
International Investment and Trade in
Services Survey Act (22 U.S.C. 3101—
3108). For the initial quarter of
coverage, BEA will send the survey to
potential respondents in March of 2007;
responses will be due by May 15, 2007.
The BE–185 will collect all the same
information as the BE–85 but will also
include financial services transactions
with affiliated parties (i.e., with foreign
affiliates, foreign parents, and foreign
affiliates of foreign parents). BEA is
currently collecting these transactions
on its quarterly direct investment
surveys (the BE–577, Direct
Transactions of U.S. Reporter with
Foreign Affiliate, the BE–605,
Transactions of U.S. Affiliate, except a
U.S. Banking Affiliate, with Foreign
Parent, and the BE–605 Bank,
Transactions of U.S. Banking Affiliate
with Foreign Parent). These transactions
with affiliated parties that are collected
on BEA(s quarterly direct investment
surveys will now be collected on the
BE–185 instead. In addition, the BE–185
will bifurcate the category for brokerage
services into two categories, by
collecting information on services
related to equities transactions
separately from other brokerage
services.
Survey Background
The Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce,
will conduct the BE–185 survey under
the International Investment and Trade
in Services Survey Act (22 U.S.C. 3101–
3108), hereinafter, ‘‘the Act’’ and
Section 5408 of the Omnibus Trade and
Competitiveness Act of 1988 (Pub. L.
100–418, 15 U.S.C. 4908(b)). Section
4(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 3103(a))
provides that the President shall, to the
extent he deems necessary and feasible,
conduct a regular data collection
program to secure current information
related to international investment and
trade in services and publish for the use
of the general public and United States
Government agencies periodic, regular,
and comprehensive statistical
information collected pursuant to this
subsection.
In Section 3 of Executive Order
11961, as amended by Executive Orders
12318 and 12518, the President
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 23 (Monday, February 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5164-5167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-26046; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-172-AD;
Amendment 39-14922; AD 2007-03-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This AD requires inspecting for discrepancies of the
activation mechanism of certain chemical oxygen generators, and
corrective action if necessary. This AD results from several incidents,
on certain airplane models, of incorrect installation of the release
pin into the safety pin hole of the activation mechanism of the
chemical oxygen generator; this resulted in failure to activate the
chemical oxygen generator when required. A separate incident occurred
on a different airplane model during deployment of the cabin oxygen
system, which resulted in failure of the
[[Page 5165]]
release pin to activate the oxygen generator at a flight attendant
station. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the activation
mechanism of the chemical oxygen generator, which could result in the
unavailability of supplemental oxygen and possible incapacitation of
passengers and cabin crew during an in-flight decompression.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 12, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of March 12,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087,
Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7305; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier
Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. That NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on October 12, 2006 (71 FR
60083). That NPRM proposed to require inspecting for discrepancies of
the activation mechanism of certain chemical oxygen generators, and
corrective action if necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Request To Incorporate by Reference/Publish Service Information
The Modification and Replacement of Parts Association (MARPA)
states that frequently ADs are derived from service information
originating with the type certificate holder or its suppliers. MARPA
also states that manufacturer's service documents are privately
authored instruments generally enjoying copyright protection against
duplication and distribution. MARPA contends that when a service
document is incorporated by reference pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51 into a public document such as an AD, it loses its private,
protected status and becomes itself a public document. MARPA explains
that if a service document is used as a mandatory element of compliance
it should not simply be referenced, but should be incorporated into the
regulatory document. MARPA states that public laws by definition must
be public, which means they cannot rely for compliance upon private
writings, especially when the writings originate in a foreign country.
MARPA adds that the interpretation of a document is not a question of
fact, but of law, bound by the figurative four corners of the document;
therefore, unless the service document is incorporated by reference, a
court of law will not consider it when interpreting the AD. MARPA is
concerned that failure to incorporate-by-reference the relevant service
information could result in a court decision invalidating the AD.
MARPA advises that it was informed that service documents are
usually not incorporated into proposed actions (NPRMs), but only into
final actions. MARPA notes that there is no indication in the NPRM that
the FAA intends to incorporate by reference the necessary service
information; in addition, there is no indication of which service
documents are mandatory and which are merely sources of additional
service information; therefore, the reader is unsure of the FAA's
intent. MARPA asks that future proposed actions indicate the FAA intent
by including the following, or a similar statement: ``We intend to
incorporate by reference the following publications.''
MARPA also states that incorporation by reference service documents
should be made available to the public by publication in the Docket
Management System (DMS) keyed to the action that incorporates them.
MARPA adds that, under the aforementioned authorities, incorporation by
reference is a technique used to reduce the size of the Federal
Register when the information is already available to the affected
individuals. MARPA notes that, traditionally, ``affected individuals''
has meant aircraft owners and operators who are generally provided
service information by the manufacturer. MARPA states that a new class
of affected individuals has emerged since the majority of aircraft
maintenance is now performed by specialty shops instead of aircraft
owners and operators. MARPA adds that this new class includes
maintenance and repair organizations (MRO), component servicing and
repair shops, parts purveyors and distributors and organizations
manufacturing or servicing alternatively certified parts under section
21.303 (``Replacement and modification parts'') of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.303). Further, MARPA notes that the concept of
brevity is now nearly archaic as documents exist more frequently in
electronic format than on paper. Therefore, MARPA asks that the service
documents deemed essential to the accomplishment of the NPRM be
incorporated by reference into the regulatory instrument, and published
in DMS prior to release of the AD.
We understand MARPA's comment concerning incorporation by
reference. The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) requires that
documents that are necessary to accomplish the requirements of the AD
be incorporated by reference during the final rule phase of rulemaking.
This final rule incorporates by reference the documents necessary for
the accomplishment of the requirements mandated by this AD. Further, we
point out that while documents that are incorporated by reference do
become public information, they do not lose their copyright protection.
For that reason, we advise the public to contact the manufacturer to
obtain copies of the referenced service information.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request to indicate in
an NPRM our intent to incorporate service information by reference.
When we propose that actions be accomplished in accordance with certain
service information in an NPRM, the public may assume we intend to IBR
that service information, as requested by the Office of the Federal
Register. Service information that is cited in the proposed AD as a
source of additional information is not presented as a requirement, and
the public may assume we do not intend to IBR that service information.
No change to this final rule is necessary in regard to the commenter's
request.
In regard to MARPA's request to post service bulletins on the
Department of
[[Page 5166]]
Transportation's DMS, we are currently in the process of reviewing
issues surrounding the posting of service bulletins on the DMS as part
of an AD docket. Once we have thoroughly examined all aspects of this
issue and have made a final determination, we will consider whether our
current practice needs to be revised. No change to the final rule is
necessary in response to this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
This AD affects about 145 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The inspection in Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-35-014
takes about 3 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80
per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of this
inspection for U.S. operators is $34,800, or $240 per airplane.
The inspection in Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-016 takes
about 1 work hour per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of this
inspection for U.S. operators is $11,600, or $80 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2007-03-11 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Amendment 39-14922.
Docket No. FAA-2006-26046; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-172-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 12, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-35-014, dated
September 25, 2003; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-016,
dated September 8, 2005.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from several incidents, on certain airplane
models, of incorrect installation of the release pin into the safety
pin hole of the activation mechanism of the chemical oxygen
generator; this resulted in failure to activate the chemical oxygen
generator when required. A separate incident occurred on a different
airplane model during deployment of the cabin oxygen system, and
resulted in failure of the release pin to activate the oxygen
generator at a flight attendant station. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the activation mechanism of the chemical oxygen
generator, which could result in the unavailability of supplemental
oxygen and possible incapacitation of passengers and cabin crew
during an in-flight decompression.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections/Corrective Action
(f) Do the detailed inspections for discrepancies of certain
chemical oxygen generators of each flight attendant and lavatory
oxygen panel, as applicable, and each passenger service unit of the
passenger oxygen system, as specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and
(f)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For airplanes identified in paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin A601R-35-014, dated September 25, 2003:
Within 550 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, do a
one-time inspection for correct alignment and engagement of the
release pin with the lanyard tube in the mask container module of
the activation (firing) mechanism in the chemical oxygen generator
by doing all the actions, including all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-35-014, dated September 25,
2003. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
(2) For airplanes identified in paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601R-35-016, dated September 8, 2005: Within 1,100
flight hours after the effective date of this AD; do a one-time
inspection for correct installation of the release pin of the
activation mechanism of the chemical oxygen generator, by doing all
the actions, including all applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601R-35-016, dated September 8, 2005. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further flight.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Note 2: Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-016, dated September
8, 2005, refers to B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 117003-35-4, dated
March 29, 2001, as an additional source of service information for
accomplishing the inspection and corrective action specified in
paragraph (f) of this AD.
[[Page 5167]]
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(h) Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2006-11, dated May 31,
2006, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-35-014,
dated September 25, 2003; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-35-
016, dated September 8, 2005; as applicable; to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of these documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR part 51. Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group,
P.O. Box 6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9,
Canada, for a copy of this service information. You may review
copies at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 24, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1600 Filed 2-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P